worksheet

  

Save Time On Research and Writing
Hire a Pro to Write You a 100% Plagiarism-Free Paper.
Get My Paper

Program Evaluation Worksheet

  

Name of Student:

Tee

Save Time On Research and Writing
Hire a Pro to Write You a 100% Plagiarism-Free Paper.
Get My Paper

Names of   Group Members:

N/A

Read the following case study, review the data sets, and answer the subsequent questions.

Case Study

Steven is a Licensed Professional Counselor who works for a community mental health center providing a psychoeducation group on stress management and anxiety reduction. The goals of the program are for members to increase coping strategies for daily life stressors and reduce their current level of anxiety. Steven holds weekly psychotherapy group meetings on Wednesdays at noon in a conference room at the mental health center. The therapy group is a closed group that runs continuously in 8-week intervals. Clients are referred to the group by therapists, physicians, and clergy. Inclusion criteria to participate in the group include formal referral and a Beck Anxiety Inventory Score of 22 or higher.  

In an effort to determine whether the services are meeting the needs of the clients, Steven has conducted a Program Evaluation and collected pre- and post-test program data from three sets of group participants. His findings will be used to determine renewal of his program. Analyze the following quantitative and qualitative data and determine whether enough evidence exists to rule the program as effective and make one recommendation regarding the future of the program.

Pre

-Test Data

Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI)

Pre-Intervention

Scores

  

Group 1

Group   2

Group   3

 
1
25
22
31
 
2
24
24
30
 
3
22
24
30
 
4
22
27
29
 
5
27
22
28
 
6
28
33
24
 
7
25
36
24
 
8
25
33
22
 
9
29
32
27
 
10
24
27
28

Post

-Test Data

Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI) Post Intervention Scores

  
Group 1
Group   2
Group   3
 
1
25
21
30
 
2
16
20
20
 
3
21
22
19
 
4
20
18
24
 
5
21
20
22
 
6
19
23
21
 
7
22
34
21
 
8
24
33
20
 
9
28
30
20
 
10
24
22
18

Post-Intervention

Qualitative Survey Responses

Question: Do you feel that participating in this group helped you feel better prepared to cope with daily life stressors?

  
Group 1
Group   2
Group   3
 
1
Y
Y
Y
 
2
N
N
Y
 
3
Y
Y
Y
 
4
Y
Y
Y
 
5
Y
Y
Y
 
6
N
Y
N
 
7
N
Y
Y
 
8
Y
Y
N
 
9
Y
N
N
 
10
Y
Y
Y
  

What is the purpose of Steven’s   Program Evaluation?

The purpose of Steven’s study was to   determine if his psychoeducation group on stress management and anxiety reduction meets the needs of the clients.

 

What is the population of interest and   who are the stakeholders for this Program Evaluation?

The population of interest are the   clients.  The potential stakeholders are the clients,   therapists/clinician, physicians, and clergy and administration.

 

Compute the mean BAI scores pre- and   post-intervention. 

Pre-Intervention
Post-Intervention
 

G 1

G2
G3
G1
G2
G3
 
25
24
21
22
24
21
 

Total Pre-Test Mean

Total Post-Test Mean

 

What is the median BAI score pre- and post-intervention?

Pre-Intervention   Median

Post-Intervention   Median

 
G1
G2
G3
G1
G2
G3
 

 

Total Pre   Test Median

Total Post   Test Median

 
  
 
  

1. Quantitative: According to the scoring criteria for the   BAI, a score of 21 or below indicates very low anxiety. What percentage of   each group’s scores falls below that clinical cutoff?

2. Qualitative: Based on the qualitative responses, what   percentage of the participants articulated a feeling of improvement?

Group 1

Group 2

Group 3

 
Pre
Post

Pre 

Post
Pre
Post
 
0%

0%

0%
 

Mean of   Total Percentage of Improvement for all 3 Groups 

 
 
1
2
3
 

 

What trends to you observe when you   compare the quantitative data with the qualitative data?

 

Based on the information provided, was   the intervention effective for reducing anxiety? Why or why not? What was the   most critical data that informed your decision?

 

Describe one recommendation that you   would make for the assessing program effectiveness going forward and explain   your rationale.(An improvement for the evaluation, not the program.)

 

Based on your data analysis, describe   one recommendation that you would make for the design of the intervention   program going forward and explain your rationale.(An improvement for the   therapy group, not the program.)

 

           

COU

N

6

6

2

6: Research Methodology and Program Evaluation

Program Evaluation Worksheet

Name of Student:

Tee

Names of Group Members:

N/A

Read the following case study, review the data sets, and answer the subsequent questions.

Case Study

Steven is a Licensed Professional Counselor who works for a community mental health center providing a psychoeducation group on stress management and anxiety reduction. The goals of the program are for members to increase coping strategies for daily life stressors and reduce their current level of anxiety. Steven holds weekly psychotherapy group meetings on Wednesdays at noon in a conference room at the mental health center. The therapy group is a closed group that runs continuously in

8

-week intervals. Clients are referred to the group by therapists, physicians, and clergy. Inclusion criteria to participate in the group include formal referral and a Beck Anxiety Inventory Score of

22

or higher.

In an effort to determine whether the services are meeting the needs of the clients, Steven has conducted a Program Evaluation and collected pre- and post-test program data from three sets of group participants. His findings will be used to determine renewal of his program. Analyze the following quantitative and qualitative data and determine whether enough evidence exists to rule the program as effective and make one recommendation regarding the future of the program.

Pre

-Test Data

Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI)

Pre-Intervention

Scores

24

22

24

30

22

27

22

28

24

25

24

25

33

22

29

27

24

27

28

Group

1

Group 2

Group

3

1

2

5

22

31

2

2

4

30

3
4

2

7

2

9

5

28

6

33

7

36

8
9

32

10

Post

-Test Data

Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI) Post Intervention Scores

Group 1

Group 2

Group 3

1

25

30

2

20

3

21

22

4

20

24

5

21

20

22

6

19

21

7

22

21

8

24

33

20

9

28

30

20

10

24

22

18

21

16

20

19

18

23

34

Post-Intervention

Qualitative Survey Responses

Question: Do you feel that participating in this group helped you feel better prepared to cope with daily life stressors?

Group 2

Group 3

1

Y

Y

2

N

Y

3

Y

Y

Y

4

Y

Y

Y

5

Y

Y

Y

6

N

Y

N

7

N

Y

Y

8

Y

Y

N

9

Y

N

N

10

Y

Y

Y

Group 1

Y

N

Compute the mean BAI scores pre- and post-intervention.

G2

G3

24

21

G1

G2

G3

G1

G2

G3

What is the purpose of Steven’s Program Evaluation?

The purpose of Steven’s study was to determine if his psychoeducation group on stress management and anxiety reduction meets the needs of the clients.

What is the population of interest and who are the stakeholders for this Program Evaluation?

The population of interest are the clients. The potential stakeholders are the clients, therapists/clinician, physicians, and clergy and administration.

Pre-Intervention Post-Intervention

G 1

G2

G3

G1

25 24 21 22

Total Pre-Test Mean

Total Post-Test Mean

What is the median BAI score pre- and post-intervention?

Pre-Intervention Median

Post-Intervention Median

Total

Pre

Test Median

Total Post Test Median

Post

Pre

Post

0%

0%

1

2

3

1. Quantitative: According to the scoring criteria for the BAI, a score of 21 or below indicates very low anxiety. What percentage of each group’s scores falls below that clinical cutoff?

2. Qualitative: Based on the qualitative responses, what percentage of the participants articulated a feeling of improvement?

Group 1

Group 2

Group 3

Pre Post Pre

0%

Mean of Total Percentage of Improvement for all 3 Groups

What trends to you observe when you compare the quantitative data with the qualitative data?

Based on the information provided, was the intervention effective for reducing anxiety? Why or why not? What was the most critical data that informed your decision?

Describe one recommendation that you would make for the assessing program effectiveness going forward and explain your rationale.(An improvement for the evaluation, not the program.)

Based on your data analysis, describe one recommendation that you would make for the design of the intervention program going forward and explain your rationale.(An improvement for the therapy group, not the program.)

© 2017 Walden University 2

Calculate your order
Pages (275 words)
Standard price: $0.00
Client Reviews
4.9
Sitejabber
4.6
Trustpilot
4.8
Our Guarantees
100% Confidentiality
Information about customers is confidential and never disclosed to third parties.
Original Writing
We complete all papers from scratch. You can get a plagiarism report.
Timely Delivery
No missed deadlines – 97% of assignments are completed in time.
Money Back
If you're confident that a writer didn't follow your order details, ask for a refund.

Calculate the price of your order

You will get a personal manager and a discount.
We'll send you the first draft for approval by at
Total price:
$0.00
Power up Your Academic Success with the
Team of Professionals. We’ve Got Your Back.
Power up Your Study Success with Experts We’ve Got Your Back.

Order your essay today and save 30% with the discount code ESSAYHELP