Week 5 Discussion
Throughout this course, we have assessed how the instructional design model ADDIE—analysis, design, development, implementation, and evaluation—can be applied to a real-world organizational training need or to a higher education curriculum project. Each week, we assessed one step, creating relevant documents for a specific problem of interest. To date, you have created an analysis document, design template, and a project plan/staffing budget estimate. This week’s project will focus on evaluation.
Week 5 Instructions:
This week, the deliverable will add to your Course Design Template with a specific learning assignment or activity, a corresponding evaluation rubric, and a summative evaluation plan.
Week 5: Formative Evaluation
- Assess the advantages and disadvantages associated with formative evaluation.
- Evaluate the three major stages of formative evaluation: one-to-one trials, small group trials, and field trials. What are the primary similarities and differences among the three?
- Assess the advantages and disadvantages associated with summative evaluation.
Tasks:
- Integrate work from previous weeks’ work into the Week 5 Course Design Template, updating information to show ongoing development in your thinking.
- Propose a student learning assignment or activity for Week/Unit 1 of your curriculum.
- Propose a grading rubric and notes that the instructor can use while assessing the student learning assignment/activity.
- Summarize a summative evaluation plan for your curriculum with at least two different types of data or data collection methods to demonstrate how you will measure whether the course achieves its goals and objectives.
- Compose a 1-2 paragraph self-reflection on the most important takeaways from the INS7200 course project.
To support your work, use your course and textbook readings and also use the South University Online Library. As in all assignments, cite your sources in your work and provide references for the citations in APA format.
Submission Details:
Name the document SU_INS7200_W5_LastName_FirstInitial .
Note: This document is a sample Course Design Template.
Institution
s may use various forms of this document (e.g., design briefs, design documents, content templates, etc.). For your INS7
2
00 course project, some of those variations have been consolidated into a single template that you will add (and improve) your content to each week.
Instructions: In this template (below) you will find several “tables” with instructions and information. The general tasks for this week’s work is to build on your previous decisions (e.g., description, objectives, sequence, strategies, and artifacts) to begin creating student learning assignments and assessment materials.
· You may either copy and paste the previous work into this document (along with relevant enhancements and improvements to that work based on feedback and your growing understanding of instructional design). Or, copy and paste the new material for this week into your week
3
document (but, then be sure to update the header line of the document from week 3 to week 5).
· Delete any week 2 or week 3 narratives from your week 5 document.
New sections that are required for W5A2 are designated as “complete this” and highlighted in yellow.
· The focus for week 5 is creating a learning assignment for week
1
of your instructional design (you created a pre-instructional strategy and instructional artifacts last week).
· Your learning assignment must also include a grading rubric (as a formative evaluation) and some brief instructor notes to support facilitation and assessment.
· You will also summarize a summative evaluation plan for your course. Treat this section like normal academic writing. That is, compose the narrative at a doctoral level utilizing supportive citations in appropriate format. Your assignment does not need a title page, but be sure to include references for your citations at the end of the document.
(
Course Design Template. W5
)
(
10
)
| Institution |
Copy/update from your previous work |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Instructional Designer |
|
Course Information |
|
|
Course Code: (e.g., ACC5001) |
|
|
Course Title: (e.g., Ethics in Accounting) |
|
|
Course Prerequisites: (e.g., ACC5000: Fundamentals of Accounting) |
Not required to complete for this assignment. Provided as an example of an additional decision/information you may need to provide for instructional design projects. |
|
Course Description: |
|
Course Text(s) Not required to complete the course text sections for the week 2 assignment unless you have a specific text in mind. Provided as an example of an additional decision/information you may need to provide for instructional design. |
|
Title: |
|
Author: |
|
Copyright/Edition: |
|
Publisher: |
|
ISBN: |
|
Technology |
||
|
Computer: (minimum requirements) |
Not required to complete for this assignment. Provided as an example of an additional decision/information you may need to provide for instructional design. Often, this is an institutional level decision. |
|
|
Software: (requirements) |
|
Course Structure |
|
|
Course Length: |
Copy/update from your previous work. |
|
Contact Hours: |
Not required to complete for this assignment. Provided as an example of an additional decision/information you may need to provide for instructional design. Often, this is an institutional level decision. Typical answer would be 40 contact hours. |
|
Credit Value |
Not required to complete for this assignment. Provided as an example of an additional decision/information you may need to provide for instructional design. Often, this is an institutional level decision. Typical answer would be 3 or 4 credits (And could be quarter credits, semester credits, etc.). |
|
Grading Scale Note. Institutions can vary. For example, SUO does not give =/- (e.g., B+ or B-). Some institutions may allow +/- grades. Some institutions may allow instructors to establish their own grading scales. SUO requires all instructors to follow the same scale. |
|
|
A |
100-90% |
|
B |
89-80% |
|
C |
79-70% |
|
D |
69-60% |
|
F |
59-0% |
|
Course Objectives Copy/update from your previous work |
|
Upon completion of the course, student will be able to: |
|
1. |
|
2. |
|
3. |
|
4. |
|
5. |
|
Order of Objectives Copy/update from your previous work |
||||||||||||
|
Week/Unit |
Objective(s) (copy from above) Note. The order of your course objectives may not be the same in this table as listed in the previous table where you composed the objectives. Objectives may be repeated more than once, but all objectives you proposed for the curriculum/training must be addressed at least once. Additionally, you may have more than one objective per week. The important issue is that you address all course objectives in your sequencing. |
Specific Topics |
Content Type(s) |
|||||||||
|
Week/Unit 1 |
Copy/update from your previous |
|||||||||||
|
work |
||||||||||||
|
Week/Unit 2 |
||||||||||||
|
Week/Unit 3 |
||||||||||||
|
Week/Unit 4 |
||||||||||||
|
Week/Unit 5 |
|
Order of Presentation |
|||||||||||||||
|
Week/Unit |
Topics (copy from Order of Objectives table above) |
Assigned Textbook/ Supplemental Reading |
Initial Presentation Type(s) |
Generative Strategy(s) |
Brief Presentation Outline or Description |
||||||||||
|
Copy/update from your |
Not Required for this |
Copy/update from |
|||||||||||||
| 1 |
previous work |
assignment, but |
your previous work |
assignment, but may provide |
|||||||||||
|
may provide |
information as appropriate. |
||||||||||||||
|
information as |
|||||||||||||||
|
appropriate. |
|||||||||||||||
| 2 | |||||||||||||||
| 3 |
|
Not Required for this assignment, but may provide information as appropriate. |
|||
|
Pre-Instructional Strategy Copy/update from your previous work |
|
Overviews |
|
Assignments Overview |
||||||||||||||
|
Assignment Delivery Method (e.g., Discussion Question, Written Paper, Quiz, Exam, Deliverable, etc.) |
Summary Description of Assignment(s) |
|||||||||||||
|
Not Required for this assignment, but would be copied from above. |
Not Required for this assignment, but may begin drafting ideas here. |
|||||||||||||
|
Instructional Detail What information will you provide the student? What will be the format for delivery? (add rows for additional weeks/components) Copy/update from your previous work |
||||
|
Week/Unit number, Component Number and Component Title (e.g., Week 1, Component 1, Starting the Journey into Instructiona l Design.) |
Objective(s) Copy from Order of Objectives Table. |
Component /Artifact Type or Description (e.g., lecture, video, interactive lesson, etc.). |
Material (e.g., lecture text—500 words or less; video script—300 words or less; interactive lesson/activity script—300 words or less). Include any cited references at the end of each lecture/script/activity/etc. |
Supplemental Information (e.g., media ideas, resource links, supplemental references, knowledge check assignment such as 5 question T/F or multiple choice). |
|
Copy/updat e from your previous work |
Copy/update from your previous work. For week 5, instead of resubmitting supplemental files or copying and pasting entire lecture (etc.) here, you can just summarize. For example, “This is a 500 word lecture on foundational leadership theories.” |
Not required for this assignment, but may draft ideas as appropriate. |
||||||||||
|
Copy/update from your previous work. For week 5, instead of resubmitting supplemental files or copying and pasting entire lecture (etc.) here, you can just summarize. For example, “This is a 300 word video script on non-verbal communication.” |
||||||||||||
|
Copy/update from your previous work. For week 5, instead of resubmitting supplemental files or copying and pasting entire lecture (etc.) here, you can just summarize. For example, “This is media graphic showing the various levels of analysis and topics in organizational behavior.” |
|
Assignment Detail (add rows for additional assignments) For week 5, complete the following components: |
|||||
|
Assignment Number, Type, and Title: For example: · Week 1 assignment 1. · Written Paper. · “Setting Tone with Communication.” |
Complete this |
||||
|
Assignment Instructions. Provide any necessary back ground material (e.g., 1-2 paragraph), clear instructions and needed tasks/deliverables the student must complete. |
|
Submission Instructions and Due Date: For example: · Submit 4-5 page paper via the electronic dropbox · Format your paper using APA style. · Paper is due by last day of the instructional week. |
|
Instructor Notes: Provide any notes that might help the instructor locate needed information (e.g., scholarly articles, textbook sections, web pages) and assess student work (e.g., key points of learning the student is expected to make in the assignment). |
|
Grading Rubric: Provide a 100 point rubric for your assignment. Your rubric should include at least one writing, format, or presentation line item. Your rubric should also include at least 3 content or competency line items related to the knowledge and/or skills in the assignment. Note. You may construct either an analytic or holistic rubric. |
Complete This. For this assignment—insert 1 – 1.5 pages of text here, proposing a framework for the summative evaluation of your course.
Consider the institutional goals you articulated early in the course project as well as the course objectives you designed for the course. How will you measure whether or not those goals/objectives are being achieved? Your summative evaluation plan must include at least two different sources of data or data collection methods for assessing your curriculum.
Complete This. For this assignment—insert 1-2 paragraph self-reflection of the most important takeaways from the INS7200 course project.
References
Complete This. Provide references for cited material used in your narrative sections above.