Week 3 Discussion

 

Pick a large company you like. Find their Statement of Cash Flows on their latest annual report, (not a summary, but the actual financial statement).

• Describe the three sections of cash flows and what they involve.
• For each section, tell us the total amount, if it is positive or negative, and analyze what each one tells you about the company.
• Upon studying its statement of cash flows, what does this combination of cash flows suggest to you about the firm?
• Is there any additional information that you would like to see to better understand this company? If so, what?

on time

Doing Discussion Questions Right

Learning to address discussion questions properly is one of the most challenging tasks for online students. Students

sometimes approach the forums as if the objective is to “get a right answer.” However, discussion questions may not

have a single right answer. In other words, discussion questions are less about getting a “right answer” and more about

engaging in a “right process” of research, application, and conversation.

Let’s start with a brief summary of what initial and follow-up responses should accomplish in discussion forums:

 Your initial response to a discussion should take the information you gathered from your readings in the

textbooks, research articles, independent scholarly papers, etc., and then present your thoughts as to how best

to address the given issue, using your research as evidence for your views.

 Your reading and follow-up response to a fellow student’s discussion reply should not be a general acceptance

of his or her opinion, but rather something that challenges the student to defend his or her stated response, or

something that presents an alternate idea or additional analysis. Again, research should be used as evidence in

your follow-up responses.

To dig a little deeper into the mechanics of doing a discussion questions right, consider:

When you read the specific information and questions in a forum, you will note that discussion questions often contain

multiple parts or starter questions. Read the instructions, questions, and topics carefully. In many cases, you do not

need to answer each specific part or starter question in your initial post. Rather, identify one or two aspects of the

discussion topic and post a substantive reply in 500 (1 page) to 1000 (2 pages) words that starts a meaningful

conversation. A good target for initial posts is 750 words at the graduate level. However, length is not necessarily an

indicator of quality. Posts must be both substantive and clear regardless of length. Make sure to provide one or two

clear points or conclusions in your initial post so that others can respond. Consider dialogue forums as analogous to a

scholarly conversation that might occur in a face-to-face classroom. Support your answers with examples and research.

Cite your research using the correct APA format.

Substantive dialogues are not repetitive. Thus, if someone else has posted a response regarding a particular aspect of

the topic in his or her initial post, you need to identify some other element of the question for your initial post. In other

words, address a different starter question or provide a different view or new ideas. The key point is that you do not just

repeat what others have already said.

Start reviewing and responding to the postings of your classmates as early in the week as possible. By the end of the

week, respond to the specified number of classmates and your instructor (see rubric). Also keep in mind the need to

participate in the course on several days per week (see the rubric). Participating on the minimum number of days does

not ensure full participation points. Participate in the discussion by asking a question, providing a statement of

clarification, providing a point of view with a rationale, challenging an aspect of the discussion, or indicating a

relationship between one or more lines of reasoning in the discussion. Follow-up posts should also be substantive and

include support from examples and correctly cited research when possible. Follow-up posts usually should not exceed

300 words. Often, they will be approximately 100 to 200 words in length. Remember though, substance is more

important than word count. Simply agreeing or disagreeing is not considered substantive. One or two sentences are not

usually considered substantive. The dialogues should be useful conversations that analyze topics both broadly and

deeply, providing evidence (research) that supports your response.

Done “right,” discussion forums can provide one of the most important learning experiences in your educational

journey.

Title Common and Preferred Stock.html

Title The Direct Method.html

Title Statement of Cash Flows.html

Title Treasury Stock.html