|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 2 |
>
Table of Content |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Introduction |
The data exhibits highlight
|
|
|
| 3 |
main areas relevant to manufacturing supply chain processes, which are: Raw Material Management, Asset Management and Factory Efficiency. The data sets in the exhibit are distinct and will provide different insights, which may or may not be codependent among each other, into the “current state” of the Juice-manufacturing company.
SKU
Save Time On Research and Writing
Hire a Pro to Write You a 100% Plagiarism-Free Paper.
Get My Paper
No |
menclature:
Container Type (bottles/cans) + Liquid Capacity (oz) + Number of Containers per Pack + Type of Fruits + Form of fruits
Table of Content
Exhibit A
: Yearly Performance Overview
This exhibit provides the performance overview of the plants in Juice-Perfect’s network.
Column B: Plant locations
Column C: Total Run Time (hr.)
Column D: Annual Planned Downtime (hr.)
Column E:
| Annual Unplanned Downtime (hr.) |
Column F: MTBF – Mean Time Before Failure (min)
Column G: MTTR – Mean Time to Repair (min)
Column H: Annual Planned
Production |
Exhibit B |
: Inventory Delays
This data set provides information regarding the unmet production plan of ONE production line as a result of inventory issues.
Column B: SKU ID
Column C:
| Planned Amount |
Column D: Bottles available in storage
Column E: Planned production date
Column F: Unmet production reason
Column G: Bottle shipment ID
Column H:
Total Amount Shipped |
Column I: Amount left in yard
Column J:
Arrival Date |
Column K: Reasons left in yard
Exhibit C
: Maintenance Schedule
This data set provides the information for work orders planned on each maintenance day for ONE production line. Details include planned/actual maintenance date, parts need and availability, reason for delay, and hours planned/actual for different worker category(Operator, Electrician, Mechanist).
Please see below for the description of each column of the data set:
Column B: Work order ID
Column C: Schedule maintenance date to complete the work order
Column D: Parts needed to perform maintenance for the work order
Column E: Parts available in inventory
Column F: Total labor hours planned to complete the work order
Column G: Total actual labor hours spent to complete the work order
Column H: Reason for delay in performing maintenance for the work order
List contains: Insufficient Materials, Labor Shortage,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Labor Expertise |
, Delays in bring the line down,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| N/A |
Column I: Hours planned for Electrician to work on the work order
Column J: Hours planned for Operator to work on the work order
Column K: Hours planned for Machinist to work on the work order
Column L: Actual hours spent for Electrician to work on the work order
Column M: Actual hours spent for Operator to work on the work order
Column N: Actual hours spent for Mechanist to work on the work order
Exhibit D
: Process Flow Chart
Raw Material intake process flow chart |
Exhibit E
: Facility Layout
Overall Facility layout including truck yard, Warehouse, staging area and production/packaging layout |
Exhibit F
: Maintenance Day Planning and Execution
The exibits shows the planning, and execution process for a maintainance day at the facility |
Exhibit A
Exhibit A Yearly Performance Overview
Mason Davoodi: Mason Davoodi:
This exhibit provides the performance overview of the plants in Juice-Perfect’s network. |
Plant/Metrics |
Total Annual Run-time (hr.) |
Annual Planned Downtown (hr.) |
Annual Unplanned Downtime (hr.)
MTBF (min) |
MTTR (min) |
Planned Annual Production |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 1 |
Illinois |
|
|
|
| 4 |
,
3
|
|
| 8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 0 |
|
|
|
| 10 |
0
|
|
| 21 |
9 |
1,
|
|
|
| 42 |
1
|
|
|
|
|
| 5 |
2
| 28 |
,000,000
2
North Carolina |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 6 |
,5
|
| 7 |
0
|
| 13 |
0
|
|
| 36 |
1.
|
| 35 |
1,
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 20 |
6
|
| 55 |
|
|
| 30 |
,000,000
3
Texas |
8,7
| 60 |
|
|
| 24 |
0
5
|
|
| 25 |
.6
|
|
|
| 98 |
1
| 54 |
|
|
|
| 46 |
,000,000
4
California |
7,665 |
|
|
|
| 19 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 2.5 |
| 53 |
6.55
|
| 78 |
9
|
| 56 |
|
|
| 50 |
,000,000
5
Georgia |
10,
|
|
|
| 95 |
0
| 250 |
|
| 109 |
5
9
|
| 49 |
55
65,000,000 |
6
Florida |
4,
|
|
|
| 38 |
0
|
| 12 |
0
6
|
|
| 57 |
|
|
| 300 |
55
36,000,000 |
Exhibit B
Exhibit B
Inventory Delays
Mason Davoodi: Mason Davoodi:
This data set provides information regarding the unmet production plan of ONE production line as a result of inventory issues. |
No
SKU ID
Mason Davoodi: Mason Davoodi:
25 SKU |
Planned Amount
Bottles Available in Storage |
Planned Production Date |
Unmet Production Reason |
Bottle Shipment ID |
Total Amount Shipped
Amount Left in Yard |
Arrival Date
Reason left in yard |
1
| B2
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 41 |
STWS
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 3000 |
|
| 1
| 200 |
0
2
| 6-Aug |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Not enough bottle in production line |
|
| 15 |
57
| 45 |
59 |
|
| 80 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 100 |
0
|
| 75 |
0
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 5-Aug |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Not received in system (Yard) |
2
B241STWS |
2
|
|
|
|
|
| 90 |
0
0
| 2
|
|
|
| 8000 |
|
|
| 22 |
-Aug
Not enough bottle in production line
15
| 18 |
10
|
| 79 |
59
1000
650 |
21-Aug |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Misplaced in Warehouse |
3
B
|
|
|
| 76 |
STWJ
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 2000 |
|
| 11 |
000
20-Aug |
Not enough bottle in production line
1
|
|
| 51 |
02045
61 |
1000 380
|
|
|
|
|
| 19-Aug |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Warehouse is full |
4
|
| B124APPJ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 23 |
000
|
| 20000 |
15-Aug |
Not enough bottle in production line
|
|
| 150 |
|
| 97 |
2
| 26 |
15
3000
1080 |
|
|
|
| 14 |
-Aug
Warehouse is full
5
|
| B76ORGS |
23000 |
|
| 1
| 9000 |
14-Aug Not enough bottle in production line
1509
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 40 |
7
| 17 |
4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 4000 |
1200
13-Aug |
Not received in system (Yard)
6
| B76WMLS |
| 190 |
00
|
|
|
|
|
| 180 |
00
8-Aug |
Not enough bottle in production line
150
| 86 |
1
77 |
50
1000
|
|
| 16 |
0
7-Aug |
Warehouse is full
7
B124GRPS |
|
|
|
| 24000 |
20000 6-Aug Not enough bottle in production line
1
|
|
| 44 |
42420
99 |
4000
3600 |
5-Aug Not received in system (Yard)
8
| B241GRPJ |
|
|
|
| 27 |
000
23000
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 31 |
-Jul
Not enough bottle in production line
1
|
|
|
|
|
| 39 |
161 |
20
87 |
4000 150
30-Jul |
Not received in system (Yard)
9
| B76KWIJ |
18000
|
|
|
|
| 1
| 6000 |
2
|
|
| 8-Jul |
Not enough bottle in production line
139
|
| 128 |
2
|
|
| 70 |
3
2000
1
| 68 |
0
2
| 7-Jul |
Misplaced in Warehouse
10
B124STWS |
|
|
| 22000 |
19000
2
| 6-Jul |
Not enough bottle in production line
13
|
| 81 |
085
|
| 34 |
4
3000
770 |
25-Jul |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Delay in Staging |
11
|
|
|
| B76ORGJ |
23000 22000
24-Jul |
Not enough bottle in production line
1
| 37 |
516
| 47 |
|
| 82 |
1000
|
| 93 |
0
2
| 3-Jul |
Misplaced in Warehouse
12
|
| B124KWIJ |
|
| 2500 |
0
22000
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 15-Jul |
Not enough bottle in production line
| 134 |
9
71 |
9711
3000
1
|
| 48 |
0
14-Jul |
Misplaced in Warehouse
13
B241WMLJ |
| 30000 |
|
| 26000 |
1
| 2-Jul |
Not enough bottle in production line
|
| 121 |
07040
|
|
|
| 94 |
4000 900
| 1
|
|
|
|
| 1-Jul |
Not received in system (Yard)
14
| B76KWIS |
18000
|
| 160 |
00
11-Jul Not enough bottle in production line
11
| 69 |
|
|
| 33 |
| 92 |
54
2000 2000
10-Jul |
Not received in system (Yard)
15
B241WMLS |
|
| 15000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 130 |
0
0
7-Jul Not enough bottle in production line
109249
|
|
|
|
| 88 |
37
2000
1
|
|
| 29 |
0
6-Jul
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Others |
16 B124APPJ
16000 |
|
|
|
| 14000 |
3-Jul Not enough bottle in production line
1081990792 |
2000 950 2-Jul Warehouse is full
17
|
|
| B124ORGJ |
| 12000 |
|
|
|
|
| 10000 |
2
| 7-Jun |
Not enough bottle in production line
10
|
|
| 67 |
660308
2000 300
| 26-Jun |
Delay in Staging
18 B124KWIJ 14000
|
| 1100 |
0
26-Jun Not enough bottle in production line
|
| 104 |
0
446071
3000 300
| 25-Jun |
Delay in Staging
19 B76ORGS 25000 23000 25-Jun Not enough bottle in production line
100
|
|
|
| 89 |
80093
2000
1060 |
|
|
|
|
| 24-Jun |
Warehouse is full
20 B76ORGJ 24000 23000
1
|
|
|
|
| 3-Jun |
Not enough bottle in production line
983
|
| 74 |
9211
1000
440 |
1
| 2-Jun |
Others
21
| B124KWIS |
27000 23000
8-Jun |
Not enough bottle in production line
9582958
|
|
| 62 |
4000
3960 |
7-Jun Misplaced in Warehouse
22 B76WMLS
280 |
00 26000 3-Jun Not enough bottle in production line
888544595 |
2000 25 2-Jun Others
23
| B124APPS |
16000 14000
30-May |
Not enough bottle in production line
85
|
| 32 |
141 |
84
2000 1040
29-May |
Misplaced in Warehouse
24 B241GRPJ
|
|
|
|
| 17000 |
16000
17-May |
Not enough bottle in production line
83754
| 52 |
34
1000
450 |
1
|
|
|
|
| 6-May |
Misplaced in Warehouse
25
B76WMLJ |
27000 24000
1
|
| 1-May |
Not enough bottle in production line
829968106 |
3000 2500
10-May |
Misplaced in Warehouse
26
| B241APPJ |
16000
13000 |
6-May Not enough bottle in production line
8
| 1
|
|
| 63 |
75544
3000 1100
5-May |
Delay in Staging
27 B124ORGJ 10000 8000
2-May |
Not enough bottle in production line
789365699 |
2000 480 1-May Not received in system (Yard)
28
| B124GRPJ |
10000 6000 1-May Not enough bottle in production line
7
|
|
|
|
| 72 |
429939
4000 1000
30-Apr |
Misplaced in Warehouse
29 B76KWIJ 16000 15000
|
|
|
| 29-Apr |
Not enough bottle in production line
769939888 |
1000
340 |
2
|
|
|
|
| 8-Apr |
Delay in Staging
30
B124WMLS |
16000 14000
2
| 6-Apr |
Not enough bottle in production line
7
|
| 151 |
58568
2000 90
2
| 5-Apr |
Warehouse is full
31 B76ORGJ 20000 18000
19-Apr |
Not enough bottle in production line
702929209 |
2000
1220 |
| 18-Apr |
Not received in system (Yard)
32 B124GRPJ
|
|
| 11000 |
10000 18-Apr Not enough bottle in production line
|
| 64 |
8775
|
|
|
| 43 |
2
1000 280
1
| 7-Apr |
Others
33 B124APPS 12000 10000
12-Apr |
Not enough bottle in production line
636927028 |
2000
| 177 |
0
1
|
|
|
| 1-Apr |
Misplaced in Warehouse
34 B76ORGJ 11000 8000 8-Apr Not enough bottle in production line
543016700 |
3000
2250 |
7-Apr Misplaced in Warehouse
35 B76ORGS 9000 8000 6-Apr Not enough bottle in production line
439547282 |
1000
630 |
5-Apr Delay in Staging
36 B124KWIS 19000 18000
27-Mar |
Not enough bottle in production line
37
| 169 |
5588
1000 250
26-Mar |
Others
37
B241GRPS |
30000
| 290 |
00
2
| 5-Mar |
Not enough bottle in production line
371493752 |
1000 300
2
|
|
|
|
| 4-Mar |
Delay in Staging
38 B76KWIS 24000 22000
21-Mar |
Not enough bottle in production line
3334
| 156 |
70
2000 1000
20-Mar |
Misplaced in Warehouse
39
B76GRPJ |
26000 23000
19-Mar |
Not enough bottle in production line
330312002 |
3000 2000
|
|
|
|
|
| 18-Mar |
Not received in system (Yard)
40 B124ORGJ 11000 8000
15-Mar |
Not enough bottle in production line
276040414 |
3000 1100
| 14-Mar |
Warehouse is full
41 B124APPJ 14000 13000 14-Mar Not enough bottle in production line
270699959 |
1000
| 850 |
| 1
| 3-Mar |
Delay in Staging
42
B76STWS |
17000 13000 13-Mar Not enough bottle in production line
255215557 |
4000
3980 |
| 1
| 2-Mar |
Warehouse is full
43
| B241APPS |
24000
| 21000 |
12-Mar Not enough bottle in production line
232555599 |
3000 290
|
|
|
|
| 11-Mar |
Others
44 B241APPS 21000 17000 5-Mar Not enough bottle in production line
166441474 |
4000
| 157 |
0
4-Mar Misplaced in Warehouse
45 B124ORGJ 18000 17000 3-Mar Not enough bottle in production line
162847032 |
1000 160 2-Mar Misplaced in Warehouse
46 B124KWIJ 13000 10000
28-Feb |
Not enough bottle in production line
| 143 |
233333
3000 1300
27-Feb |
Delay in Staging
47 B241STWS 15000 11000
13-Feb |
Not enough bottle in production line
|
| 91 |
040117
4000
3500 |
| 12-Feb |
Misplaced in Warehouse
48 B76ORGJ 17000 16000 12-Feb Not enough bottle in production line
8466
| 136 |
5
1000 850
|
|
|
| 11-Feb |
Not received in system (Yard)
49 B241APPJ 17000 13000
5-Feb |
Not enough bottle in production line
44000670 |
4000
3250 |
|
|
|
| 4-Feb |
Not received in system (Yard)
Exhibit C
| Exhibit C: Maintenance Schedule |
Mason Davoodi: Mason Davoodi:
This data set provides the information for work orders planned on each maintenance day for ONE production line. Details include planned/actual maintenance date, parts need and availability, reason for delay, and hours planned/actual for different worker category(Operator, Electrician, Mechanist). |
Planned Maintenance |
Actual Maintenance |
Work Order ID
Mason Davoodi: Mason Davoodi:
138 work order |
Schedule Maintenance Date
Zhao, Niki:
Every Monday schedule for maintenance
Picked 2 dates per month from Feb till Aug. |
Parts Needed |
Parts Available |
Labor Hours Planned |
Labor Hours Actual |
Delay Reason |
Electrical Work Hour Planned |
Operator Worked Hour Planned |
Mechanical Work Hour Planned |
Electrical Work Hour Actual |
Operator Hour Actual |
Mechanical Work Hour Actual |
10001 |
4-Feb 39 98 1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 1.7 |
N/A
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 0.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 0.2 |
0.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 0.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 0.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 0.9 |
10002 |
4-Feb 78 150
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 1.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 2.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Labor Shortage (Absence) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 0.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 0.5 |
0.2 0.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 0.8 |
0.9
10003 |
4-Feb 98
| 154 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 1.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 1.8 |
Others 0.6 0.1 0.8 0.1 0.8 0.9
10005 |
4-Feb 39 51 1.5 2.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Delays in bringing the line down |
0.5 0 1 0.8 0.7 1
10010 |
11-Feb 93 94 0.5 2.2 Labor Expertise
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 0.3 |
0.2 0 0.9 1 0.3
10011 |
11-Feb 22
129 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 1.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 1.2 |
N/A 0.7 0.2 0.7 0 0.5 0.7
10012 |
11-Feb 97 100 0.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 2.3 |
Labor Shortage (Absence) 0.2 0.3 0.2 0.6 0.9 0.8
10013 |
11-Feb 80
| 112 |
2.5 2 N/A 0.8 0.9 0.8 0.7 0.6 0.7
10014 |
|
|
|
| 18-Feb |
68 141 1.6 2 Labor Expertise 0.7 0.8 0.1 1 0.5 0.5
10015 |
18-Feb 94 100 1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 1.4 |
Labor Expertise 0 0.1 0.9 0.7 0.1 0.6
10016 |
18-Feb 4 180 2.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 1.9 |
N/A 0.8 1 0.5 0.9 0.3 0.7
10017 |
18-Feb 6 8 1.7 1.8 Others 0.9 0.6 0.2 0.9 0.4 0.5
10018 |
18-Feb 39 46 1.7
|
|
| 2.6 |
Delays in bringing the line down 0.9 0.4 0.4 0.9 0.7 1
10019 |
|
|
| 25-Feb |
81 6 1.7 1.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| No Spares parts |
0.1 1 0.6 0 0.3 0.8
10020 |
25-Feb 92
| 192 |
2 1.6 N/A 0.7 0.9 0.4 0.3 0.5 0.8
10021 |
25-Feb 10 100 1.2 2.3 Labor Expertise 0.6 0 0.6 1 1 0.3
10022 |
25-Feb 62 30 1.1 1 No Spares parts 0.3 0.1 0.7 0.6 0 0.4
10023 |
4-Mar 72 163 2.3
3.6 |
Labor Expertise 0.9 0.9 0.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 1.3 |
1.1 1.2
10024 |
4-Mar 31 20 1.9 0.3 No Spares parts 1 0.6 0.3 0.1 0.1 0.1
10025 |
4-Mar 35 128 0.9 1.1 Labor Shortage (Absence) 0.3 0.4 0.2 0.3 0 0.8
10026 |
4-Mar 34 19 1.8 1.7 No Spares parts 0.7 0.8 0.3 1 0.7 0
10027 |
11-Mar 53 50 1.1 2 No Spares parts 0.7 0.3 0.1 0.1 1 0.9
10028 |
11-Mar 91 16 1.6 1.8 No Spares parts 0.7 0.7 0.2 1 0.2 0.6
10029 |
11-Mar 12 40 0.5 2 Delays in bringing the line down 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.8 0.7 0.5
10030 |
11-Mar 23 60 0.6 1.2 Delays in bringing the line down 0.2 0.4 0 0.6 0.2 0.4
10031 |
11-Mar 71 79 2 1.5 N/A 0.5 0.7 0.8 0.7 0.3 0.5
10032 |
18-Mar 3 44 1.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 2.1 |
N/A 0.4 0.5 0.5 0.9 0.7 0.5
10033 |
18-Mar 89 109 0.9 1.9 Labor Expertise 0.3 0.6 0 0 1 0.9
10034 |
18-Mar 39
|
| 189 |
0.3 2.2 Labor Shortage (Absence) 0.3 0 0 0.2 1 1
10035 |
18-Mar 78 151 1.1 1.8 Delays in bringing the line down 0.5 0 0.6 1 0.4 0.4
10036 |
18-Mar 88 50 1.7 1 No Spares parts 0.7 0.5 0.5 0.8 0.2 0
10037 |
18-Mar
| 73 |
31 2.1 1.4 No Spares parts 0.1 1 1 0 1 0.4
10038 |
|
|
| 25-Mar |
41
181 |
2
| 3.8 |
Labor Expertise 0.9 0.3 0.8 1.5 1.3 1
10039 |
25-Mar 91
| 119 |
2 2.5 Labor Expertise 0.6 0.7 0.7 0.4 1.1 1
| 10040 |
25-Mar 74 33 1.4 0.9 No Spares parts 1 0.4 0 0.2 0.3 0.4
10040 25-Mar 94 98 1.4 1.5 Labor Expertise 0.4 0.9 0.1 0.5 0.5 0.5
10041 |
1-Apr 51
188 |
1.8 1.9 Labor Expertise 0.6 0.7 0.5 0.9 0.6 0.4
10042 |
1-Apr 29 23 0.7 1.9 No Spares parts 0 0.2 0.5 0.2 0.9 0.8
10043 |
1-Apr 88
137 |
1.5 1.4 N/A 0.6 0.7 0.2 0.4 0.8 0.2
10044 |
1-Apr 86
144 |
1.9 2 N/A 0.8 0.6 0.5 1 0.3 0.7
10045 |
8-Apr 72 72 1.7 1.7 N/A 0.6 0.9 0.2 0 0.7 1
10046 |
8-Apr 20
113 |
1.6 1.3 N/A 0.2 1 0.4 0.6 0.6 0.1
10047 |
8-Apr 35 89 2.3 2.5 Labor Expertise 0.7 1 0.6 0.6 0.9 1
10048 |
8-Apr 40 161 0.6 1.6 Labor Expertise 0.1 0.3 0.2 0.3 0.3 1
10049 |
|
|
|
| 15-Apr |
62 63 1.2 1.7 Labor Expertise 0.3 0.8 0.1 0 0.9 0.8
10050 |
15-Apr 41 97
|
| 2.4 |
2 Labor Expertise 1 1 0.4 0.8 0.2 1
10051 |
15-Apr 94 200 0.6 2.1 N/A 0.1 0 0.5 0.9 0.5 0.7
10052 |
15-Apr 76 192 0.5 1.9 N/A 0 0.5 0 0.8 1 0.1
10053 |
15-Apr 19 104 2.5 2 Labor Shortage (Absence) 0.5 1 1 1.1 0.5 0.4
10054 |
|
|
| 22-Apr |
25 5 1.6 0.8 No Spares parts 0.9 0.7 0 0 0.1 0.7
10055 |
22-Apr 36
198 |
1.5 1 Others 0.5 0.3 0.7 0.3 0.1 0.6
10056 |
22-Apr 14 33 1 2 Labor Shortage (Absence) 0 0 1 0.3 1 0.7
10057 |
22-Apr 52 77 1.2 1.4 Labor Expertise 0.1 0.2 0.9 0.7 0.4 0.3
10058 |
29-Apr 90
|
|
| 135 |
1.3 1.6 Labor Expertise 0.2 0.1 1 1.3 0.3 0
10059 |
29-Apr 6 154 1.6 1.4 Labor Expertise 0.6 0.9 0.1 0.5 0.5 0.4
| 10060 |
29-Apr 20 38
2.8 |
2.3 N/A 1 1 0.8 0.9 1 0.4
10060 29-Apr 31 109 1.6 2 N/A 0.4 0.2 1 0.8 0.5 0.7
10061 |
6-May 90 157 1.7 1.8 N/A 0.1 0.8 0.8 0.9 0.2 0.7
10062 |
6-May 41 100 1 1.6 N/A 0.4 0.1 0.5 0.7 0.6 0.3
10063 |
6-May 67 151 1.6 2.6 Labor Shortage (Absence) 0.7 0.2 0.7 2 0.3 0.3
10064 |
6-May 90 88 2 1 No Spares parts 0.9 0.1 1 0.2 0 0.8
10065 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 13-May |
82 90 0.9 1.6 Labor Expertise 0.1 0.4 0.4 0.6 0.1 0.9
10066 |
13-May 20 79 1.3 0.8 N/A 0.1 0.4 0.8 0.2 0.2 0.4
10067 |
13-May 44 143 2 1.7 N/A 1 0.1 0.9 0.3 1 0.4
10068 |
13-May 67 135 1.5 0.8 N/A 0.5 0.2 0.8 0.2 0.4 0.2
10069 |
13-May 10 7 1.6 1.5 No Spares parts 0 0.7 0.9 0.1 0.4 1
10070 |
13-May 73 177 2.5 2.3 Labor Expertise 0.5 1 1 1 1 0.3
10071 |
13-May 61
118 |
2.2 1.9 N/A 0.8 0.9 0.5 0.1 1 0.8
10072 |
13-May 95
186 |
1.2 1.5 N/A 0.5 0.7 0 0.4 0.2 0.9
10073 |
|
| 20-May |
54 72 0.7 1.2 N/A 0.2 0.1 0.4 0.4 0 0.8
10074 |
20-May 24 119 1.5 0.9 N/A 0.8 0 0.7 0.3 0.6 0
10075 |
20-May 5 121 1.6 1.9 Labor Expertise 1 0.5 0.1 0.1 0.8 1
10076 |
|
|
|
| 27-May |
82 89 1.2 1.7 Labor Shortage (Absence) 0.9 0.2 0.1 0.8 0.6 0.3
10077 |
27-May 89 41 1.8 0.7 No Spares parts 0.5 0.8 0.5 0.6 0.1 0
10078 |
27-May 40 8 2 1.9 No Spares parts 0.8 0.4 0.8 0.9 0.8 0.2
10079 |
27-May 57 46 1 1.5 No Spares parts 0 0.8 0.2 0.2 0.7 0.6
10080 |
27-May 92 63 1.1 0.5 No Spares parts 0.2 0.6 0.3 0.1 0.3 0.1
10081 |
3-Jun 40 121 2 3.8 Labor Expertise 0.2 0.9 0.9 1.6 0.9 1.3
10082 |
3-Jun 40 130 1.5 1 N/A 0.7 0.6 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.4
10083 |
3-Jun 57 23 1.9 0.2 No Spares parts 0.8 0.6 0.5 0.2 0 0
10084 |
3-Jun 80 82 0.9 2.6 Labor Expertise 0.5 0 0.4 1 0.6 1
10085 |
|
|
| 10-Jun |
33 112 2.5 2.5 Labor Expertise 0.8 0.9 0.8 1 0.9 0.6
10086 |
10-Jun 72
142 |
1.9 1.9 N/A 0.9 0.5 0.5 0.8 1 0.1
10087 |
10-Jun 7 128 2.1 1.4 N/A 0.7 0.5 0.9 0.7 0.3 0.4
10088 |
10-Jun 16 2 2.1 1.9 No Spares parts 0.8 1 0.3 0.9 0.7 0.3
10089 |
| 17-Jun |
13
179 |
0.7 2.1 Delays in bringing the line down 0 0.3 0.4 0.2 0.9 1
10090 |
17-Jun 32
125 |
1.9 2.1 Labor Expertise 0.6 0.3 1 0.5 0.8 0.8
10091 |
24-Jun 31 156 2 1.7 Labor Shortage (Absence) 0.2 0.9 0.9 1.2 0.1 0.4
10092 |
24-Jun 38 189 1.7 1.4 N/A 0.5 0.3 0.9 0.2 0.6 0.6
10093 |
24-Jun 2 135 0.9 1.7 Labor Expertise 0.8 0 0.1 0.9 0.1 0.7
10094 |
24-Jun 47 57 1.8 2.2 Labor Expertise 0.9 0.4 0.5 0.7 1 0.5
10095 |
24-Jun 21 31 0.3
|
|
| 2.7 |
Delays in bringing the line down 0.2 0 0.1 0.9 0.9 0.9
10096 |
1-Jul 93 56 1.9 1.4 No Spares parts 0.9 0.8 0.2 0.1 0.4 0.9
10097 |
1-Jul 43 10 2.1 1.3 No Spares parts 0.4 1 0.7 0.5 0.3 0.5
10098 |
1-Jul 45 56 1.5 1.5 N/A 0.1 0.8 0.6 0.5 0.1 0.9
10099 |
1-Jul 88 39 0.7 1.3 No Spares parts 0.1 0.2 0.4 0.1 0.9 0.3
10700 |
1-Jul 20 74 0.9 2 Labor Expertise 0.7 0.2 0 0.3 1 0.7
10800 |
8-Jul 98
| 182 |
1 1.9 N/A 0.1 0 0.9 0 1 0.9
10900 |
8-Jul 30 27 1.5 0.6 No Spares parts 0.1 0.5 0.9 0.2 0 0.4
10100 |
8-Jul 46 76 1 1.2 Labor Expertise 0.4 0.4 0.2 0.1 0.4 0.7
10101 |
15-Jul 43
102 |
1.2 2.2 Labor Expertise 0.3 0.1 0.8 0.8 0.6 0.8
10102 |
15-Jul 5 182 1.6 1.8 Others 0.7 0.6 0.3 0.3 0.5 1
10103 |
15-Jul 95 26 2.3 1.3 No Spares parts 0.7 0.6 1 0.1 0.5 0.7
10104 |
15-Jul 11 29 1.5 2.5 Labor Shortage (Absence) 0.3 0.9 0.3 0.8 0.9 0.8
10105 |
15-Jul 41 136 1 1.2 Others 0 0.7 0.3 0.4 0.2 0.6
10106 |
15-Jul 1 15 1.1 1.2 Labor Expertise 0.2 0.8 0.1 0 0.6 0.6
10107 |
15-Jul 75 63
2.9 |
0.7 No Spares parts 1 0.9 1 0.4 0.1 0.2
10108 |
|
|
|
|
|
| 22-Jul |
62
197 |
1.8 2.1 Delays in bringing the line down 0.5 0.3 1 0.8 0.8 0.5
10109 |
22-Jul 81 19 2.2 2 No Spares parts 0.5 0.8 0.9 0.7 0.8 0.5
10110 |
22-Jul 23
195 |
1.3 1.8 Labor Shortage (Absence) 0.5 0.2 0.6 0.1 0.7 1
10111 |
22-Jul 42 17 2.4 1.9 No Spares parts 1 0.6 0.8 0.6 0.5 0.8
10112 |
22-Jul 76 76 1.6 2.4 Labor Expertise 0.2 0.9 0.5 1 0.5 0.9
10113 |
22-Jul 70 5 1.6 1.7 No Spares parts 0.9 0.5 0.2 0.2 0.5 1
10
| 114 |
22-Jul 95 41 1.6 0.7 No Spares parts 0 0.6 1 0.7 0 0
10115 |
|
| 29-Jul |
59 88 2 4 Labor Expertise 0.3 0.8 0.9 1.1 1.9 1
10116 |
29-Jul 97 50 1.8 1.1 No Spares parts 0.9 0.5 0.4 0.2 0.2 0.7
10117 |
29-Jul 69 14 0.6 1.2 No Spares parts 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.1 0.8
10118 |
5-Aug 21 51 0.8 1.1 N/A 0.6 0.2 0 0.2 0.7 0.2
10119 |
5-Aug 31 134 1.5 2.7 N/A 0.1 1 0.4 1 0.7 1
10120 |
5-Aug 64 190 0.4 2.2 Labor Shortage (Absence) 0.4 0 0 0.8 0.9 0.5
10121 |
5-Aug 87 135 1.7 2 Labor Expertise 0.6 0.7 0.4 0.5 0.5 1
10122 |
5-Aug 43 130 1 1.9 Labor Shortage (Absence) 0 0.6 0.4 0.8 0.2 0.9
10123 |
5-Aug 42 70 0.9 2.7 Labor Shortage (Absence) 0.2 0 0.7 0.8 1 0.9
10124 |
5-Aug 99 100 1.3 1.8 Labor Shortage (Absence) 0.3 0.9 0.1 0.6 1 0.2
10125 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 12-Aug |
42 114 2 2.7 Labor Shortage (Absence) 0.7 1 0.3 1 0.7 1
10126 |
12-Aug 6 94 1.4 2.6 Delays in bringing the line down 0.3 0.4 0.7 0.9 0.8 0.9
10127 |
12-Aug 6 189 1.1 0.9 N/A 0 0.7 0.4 0.1 0.2 0.6
10128 |
12-Aug 38 150 1.5 1.7 Others 0.8 0.1 0.6 0.9 0.7 0.1
10129 |
12-Aug 67 169 2 1.2 N/A 0.1 1 0.9 0.4 0.3 0.5
10130 |
12-Aug 22 40 1.9 1.4 N/A 0.6 0.5 0.8 0.4 0.6 0.4
10131 |
12-Aug 43 49 1.1 1.6 Labor Expertise 0.7 0.4 0 0.5 0.6 0.5
10132 |
12-Aug 20 64 1.1 0.8 N/A 0.9 0.2 0 0 0.3 0.5
10133 |
19-Aug 80
174 |
1.1 2.1 Delays in bringing the line down 0.3 0.8 0 0.8 0.9 0.4
10134 |
19-Aug 34 36 1.3 1.3 N/A 1 0.2 0.1 0.7 0.6 0
10135 |
19-Aug 23
145 |
2 3 Labor Expertise 0.5 0.5 1 1 1.5 0.5
10136 |
19-Aug 70 70 1.3 1.6 Labor Expertise 0.7 0.4 0.2 0.9 0.2 0.5
10137 |
19-Aug 79
175 |
1.4 1.3 Labor Expertise 0.8 0.4 0.2 0.4 0.7 0.2
10138 |
19-Aug 24 75 1.2 1.5 Labor Expertise 1 0 0.2 0.3 1.1 0.1
Exhibit D
Exhibit D:Process Flow Chart |
Mason Davoodi: Mason Davoodi:
Raw Material intake process flow chart |
Procurement |
Stored |
Production
Exhibit E
| Exhibit E: Facility Layout |
Mason Davoodi: Mason Davoodi:
Overall Facility layout including truck yard, Warehouse, staging area and production/packaging layout |
Exhibit F
| Exhibit F: Maintenance Day Planning and Execution |
Mason Davoodi: Mason Davoodi:
The exibits shows the planning, and execution process for a maintainance day at the facility |
2 weeks planning |
1-2 days execution |
Current State Process
Currently the plant executes an 8 hour maintenance day (MD) twice a month. The planning starts 2 weeks before the MD and maintenance activities are selected from the preventive maintenance schedule. Backlog or pending maintenance activities are prioritized. Each maintenance activity has details on time and skill set required (electrician, operator, etc) for completion. Based on that, the total labor hours activities are planned.
Average time from order to receipt of spares is 2 weeks. Based on the MD activities, spares are staged in the storeroom 2 days before execution. On the morning of the MD, the spares are staged next to the packaging line. The MD activities are assigned to the staff based on availability on the day and activities are executed. At the end of the MD, progress is noted and activities not completed are noted.
S1-Material Management
S2-Asset Care
S3-Factory Effeciency
S4-Creative Solution
Term Project
Juice-Perfect’ Manufacturing Strategy & Operations:
Unplanned Downtime Reduction
`
Company Background
Juice-Perfect, a California-based juice manufacturing company, has six manufacturing plants around the US that produce various sizes and flavors of juices and smoothies. In recent years, management noticed that Juice-Perfect’s market share has decreased due to its inability to sustain the level of expectations and market demands. A group of internal analysts conducted a thorough investigation of the root causes of the performance decline and published a report that identified problems in juice- Perfect’s manufacturing and supply chain operations as critical factors. In response, leadership at the company decided to contract a team to help identify improvement areas in their supply chain and propose a plan to reform the manufacturing processes across all plants. Management has decided to pilot the changes on the packaging lines only at one of the plants. Using internal performance metrics (Exhibit A), Juice-Perfect wants to identify the worst performing plant in its network. With an aim to boost the day-to-day operations of this plant, Juice-Perfect is asking us to uncover pain points within the plant’s filling/packaging line and recommend improvement strategies that they would be able to implement nationwide.
Juice-Perfect’ Manufacturing Supply Chain Operations
Juice-Perfect employs industry-regulated manufacturing strategies uniformly across all locations. The manufacturing process, employed by Juice-Perfect, is based on a standard beverage manufacturing procedure. The complex manufacturing process can be broken down into two main areas: Upstream Production (which will be called “production”) and Filling/Packaging. The three manufacturing capabilities that govern the performance of the Filling/Packaging operations are raw material management, asset management, and factory efficiency. To ensure efficient plant operations, the three main interconnected manufacturing capabilities will have to be managed practically and economically.
Raw Material Management
The manufacturing process consists of several main steps leading to juices being filled in bottles/cartons and packed. The first step is “Raw Material Processing,” in which raw materials are procured, sorted, and processed to prepare them for production. The processed materials (products) are then staged at the packaging lines based on order requirements and other raw material availability. The produced juices are then filled into the assigned containers and sealed. Once this is complete, the finished products are packaged in different configurations depending on the order requirements.
Since the Filling/Packaging lines operate independently from the production processes, Juice-Perfect has separate teams in charge of operations and packaging material procurement, inventory management, production planning/forecasting, personnel training, asset maintenance, and shipments oversight. Due to the complexity and the fast-paced manufacturing process, Juice-Perfect needs to optimize the acquisition of packaging raw materials from the vendor. Juice-Perfect acquires a variety of packaging products (different sizes of bottles/cartons, caps, and label wrappers) to provide its current offerings to its customers which include three different sizes of bottles or cartons: large, medium, and small that would hold two different products: pure fruit juice and smoothies. Of those variations, there are ten different flavors of fruit juices and seven combinations of smoothies. It is also imperative that the communication between functional teams, operating in the upstream processes, and the packaging lines, must be seamless to effectively manage, forecast, and maintain inventory levels of packaging containers and perishable produced goods.
Asset Management
Production not only relies heavily on sales forecasting, market demand, and a thorough analysis of the historical performance data but also on well-predicted and executed asset maintenance. These aspects, and the personnel involved, must work together synchronously. An efficient asset maintenance plan must be created and executed around production plans and take into consideration the level of technical expertise and the time it takes to perform the best-standard practices. Mismanagement in these areas could result in devastating results. For instance, during one of the peak demand periods, predictive maintenance by the asset maintenance team failed because spare parts were not stocked in inventory. This led to inaccurate equipment repair history, material costs, wasted products, and varying degrees of downtime. Lost production time was not the only repercussion of this oversight; significant orders were canceled. As a preventative measure to mitigate unexpected downtime, Juice-Perfect needs to develop a robust strategy for the asset management program. Production and maintenance operators need to be assigned to each process line effectively, responsible for prioritizing work according to the production
plan and manage the transfer of workstream.
As described, Juice-Perfect’ manufacturing processes are very complicated. There may be various issues and aberrations that may detract from the performance of the network of manufacturing plants. Juice- Perfect wants the consulting team to identify key operational improvement opportunities based on the data are given, and thorough research of industry trends/standards as well as provide strategic recommendations to be nationally implemented and elevate the company’s overall performance.
DRAFT DATA EXHIBITS
A. Yearly Performance Overview
B. Inventory Delays
C. Maintenance Schedule
D. Process Flow Chart
E. Facility Layout
F. Maintenance Day Planning and Execution
Report Submission Format
1) Each team must submit a report containing no more than eleven total slides that are developed as if the team is presenting their proposal to the instructor. The eleven slides could be developed in any presentation software (e.g., PowerPoint), and then converted into PDF format (4 slides on each page). The second required slide is an executive summary overview to start the presentation. Similarly, the presentation will finish with the 11th slide for results and conclusions. There is no need for a thank you or questions slide at the end.
2) Owing to the COVID19 outbreak, we may not have in-class or live group presentations, so each team must submit a recorded presentation that should not exceed seven minutes. The format of the file should be .mp4 or .mov in a concise capacity. Students can use the NYIT logo, school colors, and emblems. At least two team members must participate in the recorded presentation.
Note that a simple voiceover narration of the team’s slides is acceptable,
Scores are given for this project
Purpose of measuring the learning goals, the following three (3) scores are given for this project
Score 1: The quality of company-specific analyses made to identify the decisions taken (MBA – 2M, MBA-QANT);
Score 2: The ability to make decisions under an uncertain environment (MBA-3G); and
Score 3: The demonstration of collaborative decision-making (MBA-1G).
Turn in your highest-quality paper
Get a qualified writer to help you with
“ Supply chain management ”
Get high-quality paper
NEW! AI matching with writer