psychology 6
Instructions
Researchers must protect participants and be aware of appropriate methods for obtaining information. What ethical considerations are important to research? In about 2 pages, write an analysis of the ethical concerns in the 3 diverse psychological research studies below. Be sure to include a paragraph of overall ethical consideration.
This paper should be 2-3 pages in length and use APA formatting (cover page, paper body formatting, citations, and references: see Rasmussen’s APA guide in the Resources tab, or by clicking
here
. Prior to submitting your paper, be sure you proofread your work to check your spelling and grammar. If you use any outside sources, please cite those sources in APA citation format.
Haslam, S. A., & Reicher, S. D. (2012).
Contesting the ‘nature’ of conformity: What Milgram and Zimbardo’s studies really show
. Plos Biology, 10(11), doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.1001426
Larsen, K. S. (1974).
Conformity in the Asch experiment
. The Journal Of Social Psychology, 94(2), 303-304. doi:10.1080/00224545.1974.9923224
Mischel, W., Ayduk, O., Berman, M. G., Casey, B. J., Gotlib, I. H., Jonides, J., & … Shoda, Y. (2011). ‘
Willpower’ over the life span: Decomposing self-regulation
. Social Cognitive And Affective Neuroscience, 6(2), 252-256. doi:10.1093/scan/nsq081
Grading Rubric
|
F |
C |
B |
A |
||||
|
0 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
|||
|
Did not Submit |
No Pass |
Competence |
Proficiency |
Mastery |
|||
|
Not Submitted |
No analysis of ethical concerns from paper 1. |
Analyzes ethical concerns from paper 1, but lacks explanation. |
Analyzes ethical concerns from paper 1, but explanation is underdeveloped. |
Analyzes ethical concerns from paper 1, fully explains. |
|||
|
No analysis of ethical concerns from paper 2. |
Analyzes ethical concerns from paper 2, but lacks explanation. |
Analyzes ethical concerns from paper 2, but explanation is underdeveloped. |
Analyzes ethical concerns from paper 2, fully explains. |
||||
|
No analysis of ethical concerns from paper 3. |
Analyzes ethical concerns from paper 3, but lacks explanation. |
Analyzes ethical concerns from paper 3, but explanation is underdeveloped. |
Analyzes ethical concerns from paper 3, fully explains. |
||||
|
No noticeable attempt to define any ethical considerations |
Attempts to define ethical considerations with some supporting evidence. |
Attempts to define ethical considerations with adequate supporting evidence. |
Thoroughly critiques define ethical considerations with strong supporting evidence. |