Opioids the community is Cobb county

My topic is Opioids the community is Cobb county please be very detailed I do not want a general paper this paper needs to be very detailed with the research thank you 

For this Assignment, you will identify a public health issue (topic) and a target population from within your community. The specific community health issue and target population selected for this intervention must be a verifiable health topic and target in your specific community. Then, using any of the theories/models discussed in this course, you will create an intervention to address this public health issue. The constructs of the theory/model chosen must be used in the creation of the intervention to address the selected population health issue. The resulting intervention must attempt to impact health behaviors or threats to the health and well-being of the selected target population.

This Assignment is about being creative and innovative, within the confines of evidence-based theory and producing an intervention. Your intervention can be either a one-time shot or long-term program that could be of value in addressing the specific need within the community in which you reside. Budget is not necessarily a concern here, so go wild if you like! Grading for this assignment will consider the following:

• Understanding of the theory/model chosen
• Feasibility of the intervention created based on the theory/model constructs
• Level of creativity in addressing an identified community issue

To prepare:

• Explain why you chose the particular public health issue within your community. (Examples might be alcohol use reduction for teens at prom, anti-smoking campaigns for construction workers, HIV/AIDS education programs for elementary students, disease prevention and health promotion for seniors at a long-term care facility, or increasing diagnostic testing participation for colonoscopies with middle-class women over 60 years of age.)  
• The specific topic and target population must be selected from your community and must be a verifiable issue. To be verifiable, it must have been a newspaper story, a health department memo or newsletter, a city proclamation, or any issue for which you can provide actual documentation, to verify, that the issue you chose was one currently or recently occurring in your community. That documentation must be provided with your response.
• Choose a specific theory or model, and explain why you are using this one in creating an intervention to address this public health issue. Your intervention must use the constructs of the theory/model and must be specific to the target group, for that topic, in your community. For example, the Social-Ecological Model (discussed last MOD) is composed of levels, namely interpersonal, intrapersonal, institutional, community, and societal. It is based on the belief that change within the physical and social environments will also influence health behavior within individuals. Consequently, if one chose the SEM as their theory/model, emphasis on the 5 levels would be critical. If, on the other hand, the Social Capital Theory was chosen, it is based on networks and relationships, with the two important factors being trust and reciprocity. So, your intervention most certainly would address cooperation, working together, and building strong bonds for healthy relationships and communities.

Write an 8- to 9-page paper (not including title page and references) that includes the following:

• Title page
• Introduction of public health issue and target population with documentation and brief explanation
• Theory/model to be employed in addressing issue (explain why you chose this theory/model)
• Identify the constructs of the theory/model and explain how they apply to your community issue
• At least one paragraph specifically describing your intervention for each construct
• Evaluation of intervention
• Conclusion

1/30/2021 Rubric Detail – Blackboard Learn

https://class.waldenu.edu/webapps/bbgs-deep-links-BBLEARN/app/course/rubric?course_id=_16767121_1&rubric_id=_2031348_1 1/3

 
Does Not
Meet
Expectations

Meets
Expectations Very Good Outstanding

Explanation of
public health
issue and target
population.
(10 points)

0 (0%) – 7 (7%)
Missing,
unoriginal, or
does not
adequately
ex[plain a
public health
issue and
target
population

8 (8%) – 8 (8%)
Adequate
explanation
and support of
a public health
issue and
target
population, but
with infrequent
and minor
issues

9 (9%) – 9 (9%)
Generally
thorough, well
organized, and
supported
explanation of
a public health
issue and
target
population
with minimal
concerns

10 (10%) –
10 (10%)
Fully
developed and
supported,
insightful,
credible, and
scholarly
explanation of
a public health
issue and
target
population

Explanation of
the
theory/model to
be employed in
addressing this
issue and why
you chose this
theory/model.
(10 points)

0 (0%) – 7 (7%)
Missing,
unoriginal, or
does not
adequately
explain
theory/model
to be
employed in
addressing
this issue and
why you chose
this
theory/model

8 (8%) – 8 (8%)
Adequate
explanation
and support of
the
theory/model
to be
employed in
addressing
this issue and
why you chose
this
theory/model,
but with
infrequent and
minor issues

9 (9%) – 9 (9%)
Generally
thorough, well
organized, and
supported
explanation of
theory/model
to be
employed in
addressing
this issue and
why you chose
this
theory/model
with minimal
concerns

10 (10%) –
10 (10%)
Fully
developed and
supported,
insightful,
credible, and
scholarly
explanation of
theory/model
to be
employed in
addressing
this issue and
why you
chose this
theory/model

Name: PUBH6038_Module6_Assignment_Rubric

Description: Criteria: Adherence to Assignment Expectations (see course for details)

EXITGrid View List View

https://class.waldenu.edu/webapps/bbgs-deep-links-BBLEARN/app/course/rubric?course_id=_16767121_1&rubric_id=_2031348_1#

https://class.waldenu.edu/webapps/bbgs-deep-links-BBLEARN/app/course/rubric?course_id=_16767121_1&rubric_id=_2031348_1#

1/30/2021 Rubric Detail – Blackboard Learn

https://class.waldenu.edu/webapps/bbgs-deep-links-BBLEARN/app/course/rubric?course_id=_16767121_1&rubric_id=_2031348_1 2/3

 
Does Not
Meet
Expectations
Meets
Expectations Very Good Outstanding

Explanation of
constructs of
the chosen
theory/model
and how they
apply to your
community
issue.
(20 points)

0 (0%) –
15 (15%)
Missing,
unoriginal, or
does not
adequately
explain
constructs of
the chosen
theory/model
and how they
apply to your
community
issue

16 (16%) –
17 (17%)
Adequate
explanation
and support of
constructs of
the chosen
theory/model
and how they
apply to your
community
issue, but with
infrequent and
minor issues

18 (18%) –
18 (18%)
Generally
thorough, well
organized, and
supported
explanation of
constructs of
the chosen
theory/model
and how they
apply to your
community
issue, but with
infrequent and
minor issues
with minimal
concerns

19 (19%) –
20 (20%)
Fully
developed and
supported,
insightful,
credible, and
scholarly
explanation of
constructs of
the chosen
theory/model
and how they
apply to your
community
issue

Description of
your
intervention for
each construct.
(20 points)

0 (0%) –
15 (15%)
Missing,
unoriginal, or
does not
adequately
describe your
intervention for
each construct

16 (16%) –
17 (17%)
Adequate
description
and support of
your
intervention for
each
construct, but
with infrequent
and minor
issues

18 (18%) –
18 (18%)
Generally
thorough, well
organized, and
supported
description of
your
intervention for
each construct
with minimal
concerns

19 (19%) –
20 (20%)
Fully
developed and
supported,
insightful,
credible, and
scholarly
description of
your
intervention
for each
construct

Evaluation of
intervention and
conclusion.
(20 points)

0 (0%) –
15 (15%)
Missing,
unoriginal, or
does not
adequately
evaluate
intervention
and/or draw
conclusions

16 (16%) –
17 (17%)
Adequate
evaluation and
support of
intervention
and
conclusions,
but with
infrequent and
minor issues

18 (18%) –
18 (18%)
Generally
thorough, well
organized, and
supported
evaluation of
intervention
and
conclusions,
with minimal
concerns

19 (19%) –
20 (20%)
Fully
developed and
supported,
insightful,
credible, and
scholarly
evaluation of
intervention
and
conclusions

1/30/2021 Rubric Detail – Blackboard Learn

https://class.waldenu.edu/webapps/bbgs-deep-links-BBLEARN/app/course/rubric?course_id=_16767121_1&rubric_id=_2031348_1 3/3

 
Does Not
Meet
Expectations
Meets
Expectations Very Good Outstanding

Written
Communication:
Extent to which
writing is
professional,
appropriate,
clear, properly
formatted,
grammatically
and structurally
correct,
synthesized,
supported, and
scholarly.
(20 points)

0 (0%) –
15 (15%)
Writing does
not meet basic
expectations
(e.g. clarity,
tone,
organization,
grammar,
spelling,
punctuation,
source
citation,
references,
title page,
synthesis of
source
material,
insufficient
originality,
etc.)

16 (16%) –
17 (17%)
Writing
adequately
meets
expectations
 for writing and
synthesis but
with infrequent
and minor
issues

18 (18%) –
18 (18%)
Writing is
generally
thorough and
grammatically
correct, with
proper
formatting and
minimal
concerns.
Synthesis is
demonstrated
and ideas are
supported
without
reliance on
quoting

19 (19%) –
20 (20%)
Writing is fully
developed,
exceptionally
well
organized,
synthesized,
supported,
scholarly, and
free of writing
errors.
Concepts are
connected
throughout
paper with
appropriate
transitions and
multiple
appropriate
resources and
examples.

Total Points: 100

Name: PUBH6038_Module6_Assignment_Rubric
Description: Criteria: Adherence to Assignment Expectations (see course for details)

https://www.cobbanddouglaspublichealth.com/services-adult-health-services-opioid-epidemic/#:~:text=Of%20Georgia’s%20counties%2C%20Cobb%20had,%40dph.ga.gov

.

file:///Users/shawnstrozier/Downloads/2017%20Georgia%20Opioid%20Overdose%20Report%20Final

https://www.cobbcounty.org/courts/district-attorney/opioid-project