Journal
Open the attached files…..
Practicum
–
Week 10 Journal Entry
Learning Objectives
Students will:
·
Develop effective documentation skills to examine group t
h
erapy sessions
with
children and
adolescents
*
·
Develop diagnoses for child and adolescent clients receiving group psy
chotherapy *
·
Analyze legal and ethical implications of counseling child and adolescent clients with psychiatric
disorders *
Select two clients you observed or counseled this week during a group therapy session for children and
adolescents. Note: The two cl
ients you select must have attended the same group
session.
If you select
the same group you selected for the Week 8 or Week 9 Journal Entries, you must select different clients.
Then, address in your Practicum Journal the following:
·
Using the Group Thera
py Progress Note in this week’s
Learning Resources
, document the group
session.
·
Describe each client (without violating HIPAA regulations), and identify any pertinent history or
medical information, including prescribed medications.
·
Using the DSM
–
5, explai
n and justify your diagnosis for each client.
·
Explain any legal and/or ethical implications related to counseling each client.
·
Support your group therapy and treatment approach with evidence
–
based literature.
Learning Resources
Required Media
https://ezp.waldenu
library.org/login?url=https://video.alexanderstreet.com/watch/leading
–
groups
-with-adolescents
h
ttps://waldenu.kanopy.com/video/adlerian
–
parent
–
consultation
Optional Resources
https://ezp.waldenu
library.org/login?url=https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=nle
bk&AN=1021972&site=eds
–
live&scope=site
https://doi
–
org.ezp.waldenulibrary.org/10.1176/appi.books.9780890425596
https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/waldenu/detail.action?docID=1581170
Practicum
–
Week 10 Journal Entry
Learning Objectives
Students will:
·
Develop effective documentation skills to examine group therapy sessions with children and
adolescents *
·
Develop diagnoses for child and adolescent clients receiving group psy
chotherapy *
·
Analyze legal and ethical implications of counseling child and adolescent clients with psychiatric
disorders *
Select two clients you observed or counseled this week during a group therapy session for children and
adolescents. Note: The two cl
ients you select must have attended the same group
session.
If you select
the same group you selected for the Week 8 or Week 9 Journal Entries, you must select different clients.
Then, address in your Practicum Journal the following:
·
Using the Group Thera
py Progress Note in this week’s Learning Resources, document the group
session.
·
Describe each client (without violating HIPAA regulations), and identify any pertinent history or
medical information, including prescribed medications.
·
Using the DSM
–
5, explai
n and justify your diagnosis for each client.
·
Explain any legal and/or ethical implications related to counseling each client.
·
Support your group therapy and treatment approach with evidence
–
based literature.
Learning Resources
Required Media
https://ezp.waldenulibrary.org/login?url=https://video.alexanderstreet.com/watch/leading
–
groups
–
with
–
adolescents
h
ttps://waldenu.kanopy.com/video/adlerian
–
parent
–
consultation
Optional Resources
https://ezp.waldenu
library.org/login?url=https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=nle
bk&AN=1021972&site=eds
–
live&scope=site
https://doi
–
org.ezp.waldenulibrary.org/10.1176/appi.books.9780890425596
https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/waldenu/detail.action?docID=1581170
Practicum – Week 10 Journal Entry
Learning Objectives
Students will:
Develop effective documentation skills to examine group therapy sessions with children and
adolescents *
Develop diagnoses for child and adolescent clients receiving group psychotherapy *
Analyze legal and ethical implications of counseling child and adolescent clients with psychiatric
disorders *
Select two clients you observed or counseled this week during a group therapy session for children and
adolescents. Note: The two clients you select must have attended the same group session. If you select
the same group you selected for the Week 8 or Week 9 Journal Entries, you must select different clients.
Then, address in your Practicum Journal the following:
Using the Group Therapy Progress Note in this week’s Learning Resources, document the group
session.
Describe each client (without violating HIPAA regulations), and identify any pertinent history or
medical information, including prescribed medications.
Using the DSM-5, explain and justify your diagnosis for each client.
Explain any legal and/or ethical implications related to counseling each client.
Support your group therapy and treatment approach with evidence-based literature.
Learning Resources
Required Media
https://ezp.waldenulibrary.org/login?url=https://video.alexanderstreet.com/watch/leading-groups-
with-adolescents
https://waldenu.kanopy.com/video/adlerian-parent-consultation
Optional Resources
https://ezp.waldenulibrary.org/login?url=https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=nle
bk&AN=1021972&site=eds-live&scope=site
https://doi-org.ezp.waldenulibrary.org/10.1176/appi.books.9780890425596
https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/waldenu/detail.action?docID=1581170
Qual
ity
of Work Submitted:
The extent of which work meets the
assigned criteria and work reflects graduate level critical and
analytic thinking.
14 (70%)
–
15 (75%)
Excellent
Assignment exceeds expectations. All topics are addressed with a minimum of 75% containing
exceptional
breadth and depth about each of the as
signment t
opics.
Assignment includes superior support of the approach with significant evidence
–
based resources.
12 (60%)
–
13 (65%)
Good
Assignment meets expectations. All topics are addressed with a minimum of 50% containing good
breadth and depth about each of the as
signment topics.
Assignment includes additional support of the approach with some evidence
-based resources.
10 (50%)
–
11 (55%)
Fair
Assignment meets most of the expectations. One required topic is either not addressed or inadequately
addresse
d.
br> Assignment may include additional support of the approach with evidence
–
based resources but they
may not fully support the approach provide
d.
0 (0%)
–
9 (45%)
Poor
Assignment superficially meets some of the expectations. Two or more required topics are either not
addressed or inadequately addressed.
Assignment fails to include additional support of the approach with evidence
-based resources.
Qual
ity of Work Submitted:
The purpose of the paper is clear.
2.5 (12.5%)
– 2.5 (12.5%) Excellent
A clear and comprehensive purpose statement is provided which delineates all required criteria.
2 (10%)
– 2 (10%) Good
Purpose of the assignment is stated, yet is brief and not
descriptive.
1.5 (7.5%)
– 1.5 (7.5%) Fair
Purpose of the assignment is vague or off topic.
0 (0%) – 1 (5%) Poor
No purpose statement was provided.
Written Expression and Formatting
Paragraph and Sentence Structure: Paragraphs make clear points that support well developed ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are clearly structured and carefully focused–neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance.
2.5 (12.5%) – 2.5 (12.5%) Excellent
Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for structure, flow, continuity and clarity
2 (10%) – 2 (10%) Good
Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for structure, flow, continuity and clarity 80% of the time.
1.5 (7.5%) – 1.5 (7.5%) Fair
Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for structure, flow, continuity and clarity 60%- 79% of the time.
0 (0%) – 1 (5%) Poor
Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for structure, flow, continuity and clarity < 60% of the time.
Quality of Work Submitted:
The extent of which work meets the
assigned criteria and work reflects graduate level critical and
analytic thinking.
14 (70%)
–
15 (75%)
Excellent
Assignment exceeds expectations. All topics are addressed with a minimum of 75% containing
exceptional breadth and depth about each of the assignment t
opics.
Assignment includes superior support of the approach with significant evidence
–
based resources.
12 (60%)
–
13 (65%)
Good
Assignment meets expectations. All topics are addressed with a minimum of 50% containing good
breadth and depth about each of the as
signment topics.
Assignment includes additional support of the approach with some evidence
–
based resources.
10 (50%)
–
11 (55%)
Fair
Assignment meets most of the expectations. One required topic is either not addressed or inadequately
addressed.
br> Assignment may include additional support of the approach with evidence
–
based resources but they
may not fully support the approach provide
d.
0 (0%)
–
9 (45%)
Poor
Assignment superficially meets some of the expectations. Two or more required topics are either not
addressed or inadequately addressed.
Assignment fails to include additional support of the approach with evidence
–
based resources.
Qual
ity of Work Submitted:
The purpose of the paper is clear.
2.5 (12.5%)
–
2.5 (12.5%)
Excellent
A clear and comprehensive purpose statement is provided which delineates all required criteria.
2 (10%)
–
2 (10%)
Good
Purpose of the assignment is stated, yet is brief and not
descriptive.
1.5 (7.5%)
–
1.5 (7.5%)
Fair
Quality of Work Submitted:
The extent of which work meets the assigned criteria and work reflects graduate level critical and
analytic thinking.
14 (70%) – 15 (75%) Excellent
Assignment exceeds expectations. All topics are addressed with a minimum of 75% containing
exceptional
breadth and depth about each of the assignment topics.
Assignment includes superior support of the approach with significant evidence-based resources.
12 (60%) – 13 (65%) Good
Assignment meets expectations. All topics are addressed with a minimum of 50% containing good
breadth and depth about each of the assignment topics.
Assignment includes additional support of the approach with some evidence-based resources.
10 (50%) – 11 (55%) Fair
Assignment meets most of the expectations. One required topic is either not addressed or inadequately
addressed.
br> Assignment may include additional support of the approach with evidence-based resources but they
may not fully support the approach provided.
0 (0%) – 9 (45%) Poor
Assignment superficially meets some of the expectations. Two or more required topics are either not
addressed or inadequately addressed.
Assignment fails to include additional support of the approach with evidence-based resources.
Quality of Work Submitted:
The purpose of the paper is clear.
2.5 (12.5%) – 2.5 (12.5%) Excellent
A clear and comprehensive purpose statement is provided which delineates all required criteria.
2 (10%) – 2 (10%) Good
Purpose of the assignment is stated, yet is brief and not descriptive.
1.5 (7.5%) – 1.5 (7.5%) Fair