Interacting with Rad
Please see attached document for assignment instructions
$15 now & $20 When complete
Need done by Thursday, 11/12/2020
Interacting With Rad
Overview
Vygotsky’s and Bruner’s theories of cognitive development emphasize a learner’s environment as pivotal
in cognitive development. But where do the theories differ? Using the behavioral goal you developed in
the Let’s Get Radical assignment, apply Vygotsky’s or Bruner’s theory to describe your approach to
achieving your desired goal.
Requirements
Using your text and at least two outside references, write a 4–5 page report in which you address the
following:
● Describe the behavioral goal you set for Rad in the assignment,
Let’s Get Radical.
● Choose Bruner’s or Vygotsky’s theory of cognitive development and explain the
fundamental tenets of the
chosen theory.
● Describe the key ways that the approach to the desired goal would change with the
chosen theory.
● Explain the assumptions of the chosen theory and how they may impact Rad or you as
the instructor.
The specific course learning outcome associated with this assignment is:
● Determine the impact of cognitive development theories on given behavioral goals.
MUST FOLLOW RUBRIC PLEASE!!!!!
Unacceptable Needs
Improvement
Competent Exemplary
Describe the
behavioral goal
you set for Rad in
the assignment,
Let’s Get Radical.
Points:
0 (0.00%)
Did not describe
the behavioral goal
you set for Rad in
the assignment,
Let’s Get Radical.
Points:
23.0625
(11.25%)
Partially described
the behavioral goal
you set for Rad in
the assignment,
Let’s Get Radical.
Points:
26.1375
(12.75%)
Satisfactorily
described the
behavioral goal you
set for Rad in the
assignment, Let’s
Get Radical.
Points:
30.75 (15.00%)
Thoroughly
described the
behavioral goal you
set for Rad in the
assignment, Let’s
Get Radical.
Choose Bruner’s
or Vygotsky’s
theory of
cognitive
development and
explain the
fundamental
tenets of the
chosen theory.
Points:
0 (0.00%)
Did not choose
Bruner’s or
Vygotsky’s theory
of cognitive
development and
did not explain the
fundamental tenets
of the chosen
theory.
Points:
46.125
(22.50%)
Chose Bruner’s or
Vygotsky’s theory
of cognitive
development and
partially explained
the fundamental
tenets of the
chosen theory.
Points:
52.275
(25.50%)
Chose Bruner’s or
Vygotsky’s theory
of cognitive
development and
satisfactorily
explained the
fundamental tenets
of the chosen
theory.
Points:
61.5 (30.00%)
Chose Bruner’s or
Vygotsky’s theory
of cognitive
development and
thoroughly
explained the
fundamental tenets
of the chosen
theory.
Describe the key
ways that the
approach to the
desired goal
would change
with the chosen
theory and
explain the
assumptions of
the chosen theory
and how they may
impact Rad or
you as the
instructor.
Points:
0 (0.00%)
Did not describe
the key ways that
the approach to the
desired goal would
change with the
chosen theory and
did not explain the
assumptions of the
chosen theory and
how they may
impact Rad or you
as the instructor.
Points:
46.125
(22.50%)
Partially described
the key ways that
the approach to the
desired goal would
change with the
chosen theory and
partially explained
the assumptions of
the chosen theory
and how they may
impact Rad or you
as the instructor.
Points:
52.275
(25.50%)
Satisfactorily
described the key
ways that the
approach to the
desired goal would
change with the
chosen theory and
satisfactorily
explained the
assumptions of the
chosen theory and
how they may
impact Rad or you
as the instructor.
Points:
61.5 (30.00%)
Thoroughly
described the key
ways that the
approach to the
desired goal would
change with the
chosen theory and
thoroughly
explained the
assumptions of the
chosen theory and
how they may
impact Rad or you
as the instructor.
Include two
outside
references.
Points:
0 (0.00%)
No references
provided.
Points:
15.375 (7.50%)
Does not meet the
required number of
references; some
or all references
are poor-quality
choices.
Points:
17.425 (8.50%)
Meets the required
number of
required; all
references are
high-quality
choices.
Points:
20.5 (10.00%)
Exceeds the
required number of
references; all
references are
high-quality
choices.
Writing
mechanics,
grammar, and
formatting.
Points:
0 (0.00%)
Serious and
persistent errors in
grammar, spelling,
punctuation, and
formatting.
Points:
7.6875 (3.75%)
Partially free of
errors in grammar,
spelling,
punctuation, and
formatting.
Points:
8.7125 (4.25%)
Mostly free of
errors in grammar,
spelling,
punctuation, and
formatting.
Points:
10.25 (5.00%)
Error-free or almost
error-free
grammar, spelling,
punctuation, and
formatting.
Information
literacy and
integration of
sources.
Points:
0 (0.00%)
Serious errors in
the integration of
sources, such as
intentional or
accidental
plagiarism, or
failure to use
in-text citations.
Points:
7.6875 (3.75%)
Sources are
partially integrated
using effective
techniques of
quoting,
paraphrasing, and
summarizing.
Points:
8.7125 (4.25%)
Sources are mostly
integrated using
effective
techniques of
quoting,
paraphrasing, and
summarizing.
Points:
10.25 (5.00%)
Sources are
consistently
integrated using
effective
techniques of
quoting,
paraphrasing, and
summarizing.
Clarity and
coherence of
writing.
Points:
0 (0.00%)
Information is
confusing to the
reader and fails to
include reasons
and evidence that
logically support
ideas.
Points:
7.6875 (3.75%)
Information is
partially clear, with
minimal reasons
and evidence that
logically support
ideas.
Points:
8.7125 (4.25%)
Information is
mostly clear and
generally
supported with
reasons and
evidence that
logically support
ideas.
Points:
10.25 (5.00%)
Information is
provided in a clear,
coherent, and
consistent manner,
with reasons and
evidence that
logically support
ideas.