Incident Action Plan

Refer to the JPB Train Derailment Scenario Overview.  Based on information provided in this document complete the attached ICS-201 form.  Using the priorities listed as guidance, develop and list at least three (3) additional objectives to help stabilize this incident.  On a separate document, develop a briefing explaining the rationale for the developed objectives (1.5 to 3 pages).

9/14 1800 RTA

JPB Northern Train Derailment

Situation Report (SITREP) – Update #1

(Unit 4 Readings and Resources

Unit 4 Discussion Board 4.1 and ensure ICS-201 to this discussion board)

Time: 1300 Local time (5+ hours since the incident occurred)

Chlorine: The leaking Chlorine car continues to leak, and the plume continues to grow, Chlorine odor can be smelled out at Plourde Point.

Fire: The woodchip fire on the west side of the tracks is spreading into the low lying vegetation and is approximately 3 acres in size. Fire Suppression operations are being hindered by the chlorine release.

Oil: The Coast Guard is reporting the leaking oil car is producing a sheen extending out to the North Side of the River and out to Anchorage A with thicker oil being seen near and on the shore by the incident. The SE side of Duke Island is oiled. There are 10 birds and one mammal that have been oiled. The animals have been captured and are being treated by Tri-State Wildlife Rescue.

Missing Personnel: Stauffer Chemical has reported they have found two of their missing employees home sick. And they have located four others sheltering in place in the Admin building. Stauffer Chemical is still reporting there are 5 still missing

Facilitiies: A Temporary Flight Restricted (TFR) area has been put in place at the request of the Incident Commander that extents ½ mile around the incident up to 5000 Above Ground Limit (AGL) / The Coast Guard has established and is enforcing a Safety / Security Zone. This is a no transit zone established in the water starting to the West of the Route 17 bridge and to the entrance way of the Harbor entrance.

Weather: Has stayed the same as previously forecasted – still potential showers for tonight.

Misc: Media interest is high. This incident occurred during the morning rush hour. The smoke and odors are getting a lot of public interest. The Mayors office is quite concerned about how this incident is being managed.

·

·

·

·

/ Group
/ Group
/ Group
/ Group
Law Enforcement

D. Jannetty

(PD)
Fire Fighting
J Bailey (FD)
HAZMAT

P. McNeilly

(CG)
Medical
D.Weaver (FD)

X

X

X

X

X

Fire Engine (Type I)

X

Fire Fighting Group

X

X

X

Law Enforcement Group

Law Enforcement Unit

X

Law Enforcement Group

X

X

Medical Group

X

Medical Group

X

X

X

Fire Fighting Group

X

Law Enforcement Unit

HPD 2344

X

Law Enforcement Group

Fire Engine (Type II)

X

0750

0750

X

Medical Group

X

1. Incident Name JPB Northern Train Derailment

2. Prepared by: (name) Randy Ashmore Date : Aug 25 20 X X Time : 0800

INCIDENT BRIEFING ICS 201-CG

3. Map/Sketch (include sketch, showing the total area of operations, the incident site/area, overflight results, trajectories, impacted shorelines, or other graphics depicting situational and response status)

4. Current Situation: At 0730 25 August, the JPB Northern Train was traveling Southbound across the Yaz Railroad bridge when it derailed.

A total of six cars left the track. Two were carrying 29,000 gallons of fuel oil and are closest to the river. Two were carrying wood chips, and two

were full 90 ton pressurized chlorine cars. The two wood chip cars landed on the west side of the tracks and one is on fire. The fuel oil cars

Landed one on the east and one on the west side of the tracks nearest the river. The one on the west side of the track is leaking and

Producing a sheen that is expanding. The two chlorine cars ended up crashing through the Stauffer Chemical facilities perimeter fence and

One car hit and damaged a facility tank. The tank does not appear to be leaking at this time, however that one chlorine car is leaking.

Stauffer Chemical was in the middle of a shift change when this incident occurred, there are 11 employees unaccounted for at this time. The

train conductor and his assistant have been located and have been transported to the local hospital with minor injuries.

5. Initial Response Objectives, Current Actions, Planned Actions

Priorities:

1) Life Safety 3) Environmental Cleanup

2) Incident Stabilization 4) Economic Recovery

Objectives:

· Provide for the safety and security of responders and maximize the protection of public health and welfare

Instructions : Develop and list at least three, but no more than five additional objectives for this incident below :

·

Current Actions:

· Actively evacuating personnel and public from the exclusion zone

· Conducting fire suppression operations on the burning rail car and grass fire

· Conducting medical triage and transport

· Enforcing perimeter control around the exclusion area

· Making preparations to conduct entry operations to secure the chlorine release

· Making preparations to search the Stauffer Company for victims

Planned Actions:

· Continue ongoing operations to meet initial response objectives

· Establish temporary morgue location

· Conduct entry operations into the Stauffer facility to secure the chlorine release

· Evaluate shifting the Incident Command Post to the Staffork Yacht Club

· Establish family assistance coordinator.

Incident Potential:

This is a complex incident involving numerous jurisdictions within the Hiatusport community. Anticipate staffing to support 24×7

Operations for the next 3-5 days w/ longer clean-up and recovery.

6. Current Organization (fill in additional appropriate organization) Incident Commander(s) Tom Samph (FD) Safety Officer R. Ashmore (USCG) Liaison Officer Public Information Officer Operations Section Planning Section Logistics Section Finance Section Don Mroz (FD) Search Team 1 Search Team 2 Triage Crew 1 Ambulance 1 Ambulance 4 Air Ambulance / Group Search J. McDonnel (FD) HAZMAT 3 HAZMAT 2 Engine 123 Engine 107 Engine 14 Engine 17 Engine 118 Terminal Ave. Staging – K. Bond (FD) PD-1410 (Helo) PD 1A12 Sheriff 1567 Sheriff 1569 HPD 1A13

HPD 2344

7. Resources Summary Resource Ordered

Resource Identifier

Date Time Ordered

On- Scene ETA (X)

NOTES: (Location/Assignment/Status)

T. Samph (FD)

X

IC / ICP

HAZMAT Team (Type II)

HFD HAZMAT 2

HAZMAT Group

Air Ambulance (Type III)

HCH Air Rescue

Medical Group

D. Mroz

OSC / ICP

Helicopter (Type II LE)

HPD-1410

Law Enforcement Group

Fire Engine (Type I)

HPD Engine 123

Fire Fighting Group

HPD Engine 107

R. Ashmore

SOFR / ICP

D. Jannetty

Law Enforcement Group Supervisor

Law Enforcement Unit

HSCD Sheriff 1567

HPD 1A12

D. Weaver

Medical Group Supervisor

Ambulance (Type I)

HCH Ambulance #1

Ambulance (Type II)

HCH Ambulance #4

P. McNeilly

HAZMAT Group Supervisor

J. Bailey

Firefighting Group Supervisor

Fire Engine (Type II)

HPD Engine 17

J. Mcdonnell

Search Group Supervisor

PSC

M. Cioffi

0750

0830

HCFD Engine 14

Firefighting Group

RESL

M. Lewis

0845

SITL

R. Dickson

0820

Triage Crew

HCH Crew 1

Staging Area Manager

K. Bond

Terminal Ave Staging

INCIDENT BRIEFING ICS 201-CG (pg 1 of 4) (Rev 6/13)

Incident Action Plan Objectives

Due: Midnight Sunday (EST) of Unit 4.

Length and Format: This paper is 1.5 to 3 pages in length. APA formatting and citations

shall be used. At least two primary source references will be used.

Overview: Based on the JPB Train Derailment Scenario Overview (located in Unit 1

Readings & Resources) you will complete the attached ICS-201 form and using the priorities

listed as guidance, develop and list at least three (3) additional incident objectives to help

stabilize this incident. You will then develop a briefing explaining the rationale for your

additional objectives.

The requirements for Project 1 are:

 Complete the ICS-201 form by developing at least three (3) additional objectives to

help stabilize the incident as described in the JPB Train Derailment Overview.

 In a separate document, develop a briefing and explain your rationale for your

additional objectives.

 Use Incident Command System (ICS) and National Incident Management System

(NIMS) terminology throughout the briefing where appropriate.

Students: Be sure to read the criteria (last page), by which your paper/project will

be evaluated, before you write, and again after you write.

Project 1

EMH340—Introduction to Emergency
Response & Incident Management

EMH340 – Project Writing Assignment Rubric

Performanc
e Area

(90-100) A (80-89) B (70-79) C (60-69) D/F < 60 Score

Structure
Well-
developed
Paragraphs;
complete
sentences; title
page;
references
page; body of
work meets
requirements

Written work is
clear and
excellent
college-level
work;
Paragraphing
and transitions
are clear and
appropriate;
appropriate
guidelines
outlined for
paper were
met

(see
assignment
directions).

Written work is
clear and
adequate
college-level
work;
Paragraphing
and transitions
are adequate;
appropriate
guidelines
outlined for
paper were
met with a few
noted problems

(see
assignment
directions).

Written work
inadequate for
college-level
work;
Paragraphing
and transitions
are
inadequate;
inappropriate
guidelines
outlined for
paper were not
met with
several
problems (see

assignmen
t
directions).

Organizational
structure and
paragraphing
have serious
and persistent
errors.
Assignment
directions were
ignored and
information
provided was
insufficient to
meet
assignment
guidelines.

Content
Demonstrate
s knowledge
of topics;
thorough
discussion of
concepts;
appropriate
integration of
topics;
scholarly
journal use

The length of
the written
work provides
in-depth
coverage of
the topics,
assertions are
clearly
supported by
evidence;
Paper meets
required length
of pages and
content areas;
3 or more
primary
sources were
used.

The length of
the written
work is
sufficient to
cover the
topic;
assertions are
supported by
evidence; does
not meet full
required
number of
pages and
content areas.
3 or more
primary
sources were
used.

Written work
does not do an
adequate job
of covering the
assigned topic;
assertions are
weakly
supported by
evidence;
paper is
inadequate in
meeting the
page and
content area
requirements;
less than 3
primary

sources
were used.

Written work
does not cover
the assigned
topic; assertions
are not
supported by
evidence; paper
is seriously
lacking in
content and
detail; primary
sources were not
used or were
used improperly.

Mechanics
Good use of
standard
written English;
spelling;

grammar;
use of APA
style

Written work
has no major
errors in word
selection and
use; sentence

structure,
spelling,

Written work
was generally
free of errors in
word selection
and use;

sentence
structure,

Written work
had several
major errors in
word selection
and use;

sentence
structure,

Written work
had serious and
persistent errors
in word selection
and use;
sentence

structure,
spelling,

grammar,
punctuation
was
appropriate;
APA style was
acceptable
with no errors
or minor
errors.

spelling,
grammar,
punctuation
was adequate;
APA style was
acceptable
with a few
errors.

spelling,
grammar,
punctuation
was
inappropriate;
APA style
was
unacceptable
with several
errors.

grammar,
punctuation
was
inappropriate
and with
serious errors;
major errors in
APA style.

TOTAL

OVERALL SCORE = TOTAL/3