Evidence-Based Project, Part 1: Identifying Research Methodologies

Full
citation
of selected article

Article #1

Article #2

Article #3

Article #4

Why
you chose this article and/or
how it relates
to the clinical issue of interest (include a brief
explanation of the ethics
of research related to your clinical issue of interest)

Brief
description of the aims
of the research of each peer-reviewed article

Brief description of the
research methodology
used Be sure to identify if the methodology used was
qualitative
,
quantitative
, or a
mixed-methods
approach. Be specific.

A brief description of the
strengths
of each of the research methodologies used, including
reliability
and
validity
of how the methodology was applied in each of the peer-reviewed articles you selected.

General Notes/Comments

Excellent

Good

Fair

Poor

Part 1: Identifying Research Methodologies

After reading each of the four peer-reviewed articles you selected, use the Matrix Worksheet template to analyze the methodologies applied in each of the four peer-reviewed articles. Your analysis should include the following:

81 (81%) – 90 (90%)

The response accurately and clearly provides a full citation of each article in APA format.
The responses accurately and thoroughly explain the selection of these articles and/or how they relate to a clinical issue of interest, including a detailed explanation of the ethics of research.
The responses accurately and clearly describe the aims of the research.
The responses accurately and clearly describe the research methodology used, and clearly identify the type of methodology used with specific and relevant examples.
The responses accurately and clearly describe the strengths of each of the research methodologies used, including a detailed explanation of the reliability and validity of how the methodology was applied in each of the articles selected.
The responses provide a complete, detailed, and specific synthesis of two outside resources related to the selection of articles and two or three course-specific resources.

72 (72%) – 80 (80%)

The response accurately provides a citation of each peer-reviewed article in APA format.
The responses accurately explain the selection of these peer-reviewed articles and/or how they relate to a clinical issue of interest, including an accurate explanation of ethics.
The responses accurately describe the aims of the research of each peer-reviewed article.
The responses accurately describe the research methodology used and type of methodology used with some examples.
The responses accurately describe the strengths of each of the research methodologies used, including an explanation of the reliability and validity of how the methodology was applied in each of the peer-reviewed articles selected.
The responses provide an accurate synthesis of at least one outside resource related to the selection of the peer-reviewed articles. The response integrates at least one outside resource and two or three course-specific resources.

63 (63%) – 71 (71%)

The response inaccurately or vaguely provides a citation of each peer-reviewed article in APA format.
The responses inaccurately or vaguely explain the selection of these articles and/or how they relate to a clinical issue of interest, including the explanation of the ethics.
The responses inaccurately or vaguely describe the aims of the research of each article.
The responses inaccurately or vaguely describe the research methodology used and the type of methodology used, with only some examples.
The responses inaccurately or vaguely describe the strengths of each of the research methodologies used, including the explanation of the reliability and validity of how the methodology was applied in each of the articles selected.
The responses provided vaguely or inaccurately synthesize outside resources related to the selection of the articles. The response minimally integrates resources that may support the responses provided.

0 (0%) – 62 (62%)

The response inaccurately and vaguely provides a citation of each peer-reviewed article in APA format or is missing.
The responses inaccurately & vaguely explain the selection of these articles and/or how they relate to a clinical issue, including the explanation of ethics of research, or they are missing.
The responses inaccurately and vaguely describe the aims of the research, or they are missing.
The responses inaccurately and vaguely describe the research methodology used, the type of methodology used with no examples present, or they are missing.
The responses inaccurately and vaguely describe the strengths of each of the methodologies used, including the explanation of the reliability and validity of the methodology, or they are missing.
The responses provide a vague and inaccurate synthesis of outside resources related to the selection of the articles and fail to integrate any resources to support the responses provided, or is missing.

Written Expression and Formatting—Paragraph Development and Organization:

Paragraphs make clear points that support well-developed ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are carefully focused—neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement and introduction is provided, which delineates all required criteria.

5 (5%) – 5 (5%)

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity.
A clear and comprehensive purpose statement, introduction, and conclusion are provided, which delineates all required criteria.

4 (4%) – 4 (4%)

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 80% of the time. Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment are stated but are brief and not descriptive.

3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%)

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 60–79% of the time.
Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment is vague or off topic.

0 (0%) – 3 (3%)

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity less than 60% of the time.
No purpose statement, introduction, or conclusion is provided.

Written Expression and Formatting—English Writing Standards:

Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation.

Contains a few (one or two) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.

Contains several (three or four) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.

Contains many (five or more) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding.