Comparative analysis paper
SectionsSEARCH
Skip to content
Skip to site index
Log In
Log In
Today’s Paper
Opinion
|
In Defense of Cultural Appropriation
Advertisement
Continue reading the main story
Opinion
Supported by
Continue reading the main story
Kenan Malik
In Defense of Cultural Appropriation
By Kenan Malik
- June 14, 2017
Elvis Presley’s appropriation of African-American music, or what was then called “race music,” was key to his success in the 1950s.Credit…Bettmann Archive, via Getty Images
LONDON — It is just as well that I’m a writer, not an editor. Were I editing a
news
paper or magazine, I might soon be out of a job. For this is an essay in defense of cultural appropriation.
In Canada last month, three editors lost their jobs after making such a defense.
The controversy began when Hal Niedzviecki, editor of Write, the magazine of the Canadian Writers’ Union, penned an editorial defending the right of white authors to create characters from minority or indigenous backgrounds. Within days, a
social media backlash
forced him to resign. The Writers’ Union issued an apology for an article that its Equity Task Force claimed “re-entrenches the deeply racist assumptions” held about art.
Another editor, Jonathan Kay, of The Walrus magazine, was also
compelled to step down
after tweeting his support for Mr. Niedzviecki. Meanwhile, the broadcaster CBC
moved
Steve Ladurantaye, managing editor of its flagship news program The National, to a different post, similarly for an “unacceptable tweet” about the controversy.
It’s not just editors who have to tread carefully. Last year, the novelist Lionel Shriver
generated
a worldwide storm after defending cultural appropriation in an address to the Brisbane Writers Festival. Earlier this year,
controversy erupted
when New York’s Whitney Museum picked for its Biennial Exhibition Dana Schutz’s painting of the mutilated corpse of Emmett Till, a 14-year-old African-American murdered by two white men in Mississippi in 1955. Many objected to a white painter like Ms. Schutz depicting such a traumatic moment in black history. The British artist Hannah Black
organized
a petition to have the work destroyed.
Other works of art have been destroyed. The sculptor Sam Durant’s piece “Scaffold,” honoring 38 Native Americans executed in 1862 in Minneapolis, was recently being assembled in the Minneapolis Sculpture Garden. But after protests from indigenous activists that Mr. Durant was appropriating their history, the artist dismantled his own work, and
made its wood available
to be burned in a Dakota Sioux ceremony.
What is cultural appropriation, and why is it so controversial? Susan Scafidi, a law professor at Fordham University,
defines
it as “taking intellectual property, traditional knowledge, cultural expressions, or artifacts from someone else’s culture without permission.” This can include the “unauthorized use of another culture’s dance, dress, music, language, folklore, cuisine, traditional medicine, religious symbols, etc.”
Appropriation suggests theft, and a process analogous to the seizure of land or artifacts. In the case of culture, however, what is called appropriation is not theft but messy interaction. Writers and artists necessarily engage with the experiences of others. Nobody owns a culture, but everyone inhabits one, and in inhabiting a culture, one finds the tools for reaching out to other cultures.
Critics of cultural appropriation insist that they are opposed not to cultural engagement, but to racism. They want to protect marginalized cultures and ensure that such cultures speak for themselves, not simply be seen through the eyes of
more
privileged groups.
Certainly, cultural engagement does not take place on a level playing field. Racism and inequality shape the ways in which people imagine others. Yet it is difficult to see how creating gated cultures helps promote social justice.
There are few figures more important to the development of rock ’n’ roll than Chuck Berry (who died in March). In the 1950s, white radio stations refused to play his songs, categorizing them as “race music.” Then came Elvis Presley. A white boy playing the same tunes was cool. Elvis was feted, Mr. Berry and other black pioneers largely ignored. Racism defined who became the cultural icon.
But imagine that Elvis had been prevented from appropriating so-called black music. Would that have challenged racism, or eradicated Jim Crow laws? Clearly not. It took a social struggle — the civil rights movement — to bring about change. That struggle was built not on cultural separation, but on the demand for equal rights and universal values.
Campaigns against cultural appropriation reveal the changing meaning of what it is to challenge racism. Once, it was a demand for equal treatment for all. Now it calls for cultures to be walled off and boundaries to be policed.
But who does the policing? Every society has its gatekeepers, whose role is to protect certain institutions, maintain the privileges of particular groups and cordon off some beliefs from challenge. Such gatekeepers protect not the marginalized but the powerful. Racism itself is a form of gatekeeping, a means of denying racialized groups equal rights, access and opportunities.
In minority communities, the gatekeepers are usually self-appointed guardians whose power rests on their ability to define what is acceptable and what is beyond the bounds. They appropriate for themselves the authority to license certain forms of cultural engagement, and in doing so, entrench their power.
The most potent form of gatekeeping is religion. When certain beliefs are deemed sacred, they are put beyond questioning. To challenge such beliefs is to commit blasphemy.
The accusation of cultural appropriation is a secular version of the charge of blasphemy. It’s the insistence that certain beliefs and images are so important to particular cultures that they may not appropriated by others. This is most clearly seen in the debate about Ms. Schutz’s painting “Open Casket.”
In 1955, Emmett Till’s mother
urged
the publication of photographs of her son’s mutilated body as it lay in its coffin. Till’s murder, and the photographs,
played a major role
in shaping the civil rights movement and have acquired an almost sacred quality. It was from those photos that Ms. Schutz began her painting.
To suggest that she, as a white painter, should not depict images of black suffering is as troubling as the demand by some Muslims that Salman Rushdie’s novel “The Satanic Verses” should be censored because of supposed blasphemies in its depiction of Islam. In fact, it’s more troubling because, as the critic Adam Shatz has observed, the campaign against Ms. Schutz’s work contains an “implicit disavowal that acts of radical sympathy, and imaginative identification, are possible across racial lines.”
Seventy years ago, racist radio stations refused to play “race music” for a white audience. Today, antiracist activists insist that white painters should not portray black subjects. To appropriate a phrase from a culture not my own: Plus ça change, plus c’est la même chose.
Advertisement
Continue reading the main story
Site Index
Go to Home Page »
news
- home page
- world
- U.S.
- politics
- Election 2020
- New York
- business
- tech
- science
- climate
- sports
- obituaries
- the upshot
- Español
- 中文网
- today’s paper
- corrections
opinion
- today’s opinion
- op-ed columnists
- editorials
- op-ed Contributors
- letters
- sunday review
- video: opinion
arts
- today’s arts
- art & design
- books
- dance
- movies
- music
- Pop Culture
- television
- theater
- watching
- video: arts
living
- automobiles
- Cooking
- crossword
- education
- food
- health
- jobs
- magazine
- parenting
- real estate
- style
- t magazine
- travel
- love
listings & more
- Reader Center
- Wirecutter
- Live Events
- The Learning Network
- tools & services
- N.Y.C. events guide
- multimedia
- photography
- video
- Newsletters
- NYT store
- times journeys
- manage my account
news
home page
world
U.S.
politics
Election 2020
New York
business
tech
science
climate
sports
obituaries
the upshot
Español
中文网
today’s paper
corrections
opinion
today’s opinion
op-ed columnists
editorials
op-ed Contributors
letters
sunday review
video: opinion
arts
today’s arts
art & design
books
dance
movies
music
Pop Culture
television
theater
watching
video: arts
living
automobiles
Cooking
crossword
education
food
health
jobs
magazine
parenting
real estate
style
t magazine
travel
love
more
Reader Center
Wirecutter
Live Events
The Learning Network
tools & services
N.Y.C. events guide
multimedia
photography
video
Newsletters
NYT store
times journeys
manage my account
Subscribe
- home delivery
- digital subscriptions
- Crossword
Cooking
- email newsletters
- corporate subscriptions
- education rate
- mobile applications
- replica edition
Español
中文网
Site Information Navigation
- © 2020
The New York Times Company
- NYTCo
- Contact Us
- Work with us
- Advertise
- T Brand Studio
- Your Ad Choices
- Privacy
- Terms of Service
- Terms of Sale
- Site Map
- Help
- Subscriptions