Clinical Field Experience C and D
This is two different assignments
|
Clinical Field Experience C: Pre-Assessment Using Non-Standardized Assessments |
|
The clinical field experience in this course must take place in a K-3 setting.
Allocate at least 5 hours in the field to support this assignment.
Review the benchmark assignment, “Small Group Assessment Plan” in Topic 5, as you will use this field experience to inform Part 1 of that assignment.
In this field experience, continue to observe the class. With your mentor teacher, select a small diverse group of 4-6 students (include at least one student with exceptionalities) and determine an academic area in which to assess them.
Select a technology-based assessment to use with these students. Your assessment should be a developmentally appropriate and engaging activity or game that will quickly assess the students’ present levels in the selected area. It may be professionally produced, self-created, or pre-created by your mentor teacher. Implement the assessment to establish the students’ current levels of performance in the academic area you chose to assess.
For your technological device, you may choose to use an interactive white board, tablet, computer, augmentative communication device, or any other form of technology found in your classroom for this assignment. You are also encouraged to differentiate the assessment to meet individual student needs, as applicable for the students in the group.
In 250-500 words, summarize your developmentally appropriate and engaging technology-based assessment choices and rationalize how your choices meet the needs of students in your small group. Be sure to explain how you will use your findings in your future professional practice.
If technology is not available, create an alternative pre-assessment to implement. In addition, identify and rationalize technology that could be an appropriate support for the students identified as well as the school or district representative that supports technology to obtain tech support to meet specific student needs in the classroom.
Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.
This assignment uses a rubric. Review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.
You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite.
|
Clinical Field Experience D: Design and Deliver a Lesson |
The clinical field experience in this course must take place in a K-3 setting.
Allocate at least 5 hours in the field to support this clinical field experience.
Use this field experience to inform Part 2 of the benchmark assignment.
In this field experience, continue to observe the class, in particular the small group you identified in the previous topic. Using the “COE Lesson Plan Template” and the information you gained from your pre-assessment from Part 1 of your benchmark, create and deliver a lesson for the group that will support the students’ growth in the selected developmental or academic areas. After you have facilitated the lesson, use the same technology-based assessment you used to pre-assess as a post-assessment to evaluate the small group’s progress.
Write a 250-500 word reflection on your experience that includes modifications you would make to your lesson, assessment, and/or assessment procedures in the future. Be sure to explain how you will use your findings in your future professional practice.
Submit your small group lesson and reflection as one deliverable.
Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.
This assignment uses a rubric. Review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.
You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite.
Document the hours and locations that you spend in the field on your Clinical Field Experience Verification Form.
Rubic_Print_Format
| Course Code | Class Code | Assignment Title | Total Points | ||||||||
| ECS-590 | ECS-590-O500 | Clinical Field Experience C: Pre-Assessment Using Non-Standardized Assessments | 30.0 | ||||||||
| Criteria | Percentage | 1: No Submission (0.00%) | 2: Insufficient (69.00%) | 3: Approaching (74.00%) | 4: Acceptable (87.00%) | 5: Target (100.00%) | Comments | Points Earned | |||
| 100.0% | |||||||||||
| Field Experience Summary: Technology-based Assessment Choices | 30.0% | Not addressed. | Summary of technology-based assessment choices is insufficient, or technology selected is inappropriate for students. | Summary of technology-based assessment choices is lacking substantive detail, or technology selected may not be ideal for students. | Summary adequately describes developmentally appropriate and engaging technology-based assessment choices. | Summary comprehensively describes developmentally appropriate and engaging technology-based assessment choices. | |||||
| Field Experience Summary: Technology-based Assessment Choices Rationale | Summary poorly rationalizes technology-based assessment choices by including irrelevant details, or inappropriately or insufficiently addressing student needs. | Rationalization for technology-based assessment choices lacks sufficient detail and professionally-grounded reasoning, only vaguely focusing on student needs. | Summary soundly rationalizes technology-based assessment choices, generally focusing on student needs. | Summary convincingly rationalizes technology-based assessment choices, clearly focusing on student needs. | |||||||
| Field Experience Summary: Future Professional Practice Application | Applications to future practice are incomplete, inappropriate, or unrelated to what was described in the summary. | Applications to future practice are unrealistic or underdeveloped. | Applications to future practice are sound, useful, and appropriate for students. | Conclusions and applications to future practice are insightful, realistic, and clearly consider the needs of students. | |||||||
| Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use) | 10.0% | Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register) and/or word choice are present. Sentence structure is correct but not varied. | Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct and varied sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are employed. | Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. The writer uses a variety of effective sentence structures and figures of speech. | Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English. | ||||||
| Total Weightage | 100% |
Rubic_Print_Format
| Course Code | Class Code | Assignment Title | Total Points | ||||||
| ECS-590 | ECS-590-O500 | Clinical Field Experience D: Design and Deliver a Lesson | 30.0 | ||||||
| Criteria | Percentage | 1: No Submission (0.00%) | 2: Insufficient (69.00%) | 3: Approaching (74.00%) | 4: Acceptable (87.00%) | 5: Target (100.00%) | Comments | Points Earned | |
| 100.0% | |||||||||
| Field Experience Summary: Modifications | 45.0% | Not addressed. | Summary of lesson, assessment and/or assessment procedures proposed modifications is unclear or irrelevant. | Summary of proposed modifications for lesson, assessment and/or assessment procedures are lacking substantive detail, or modifications may not be ideal for students. | Summary describes reasonable modifications that could be made to lesson, assessment and/or assessment procedures. | Summary comprehensively describes thoughtful modifications that could be made to lesson, assessment and/or assessment procedures. | |||
| Field Experience Summary: Future Professional Practice Application | Applications to future practice are incomplete, inappropriate, or unrelated to what was described in the summary. | Applications to future practice are unrealistic or underdeveloped. | Applications to future practice are sound, useful, and appropriate for students. | Conclusions and applications to future practice are insightful, realistic, and clearly consider the needs of students. | |||||
| Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use) | 10.0% | Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register) and/or word choice are present. Sentence structure is correct but not varied. | Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct and varied sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are employed. | Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. The writer uses a variety of effective sentence structures and figures of speech. | Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English. | ||||
| Total Weightage | 100% |