Case Study Analysis

 

Save Time On Research and Writing
Hire a Pro to Write You a 100% Plagiarism-Free Paper.
Get My Paper

Read the case,  reading material and backgroud I uploaded. answer the quesiton. make sure you incorporate reading material into the paper.   

 What should Erik Peterson have done?     

While you do not necessarily need to directly answer the questions below, they might help organize your thoughts.  Be sure to review the grading rubric and focus your answer on a clearly state course of action that applies the principles presented in the class materials.  

·         How might Peterson have applied the principles of leadership studied in this module to turn the situation at Biometra around and deliver a successful product launch? 

Save Time On Research and Writing
Hire a Pro to Write You a 100% Plagiarism-Free Paper.
Get My Paper

 ·         Given the situation, should Peterson have used a more task-oriented or people-oriented leadership style? 

 ·         What should Peterson have done to have made this a successful career experience?

Knowing what actually happened before submitting your written case study analysis makes this assignment a bit different that the rest of the case studies assigned in this course.  Instead of explaining what the protagonist should do, in this assignment you will need to explain what Erik Peterson should have done to apply the leadership principles we studied to have achieved a successful outcome.

Thoughtfully consider what Richard Jenkins expected Erik Peterson to do when he promoted him to acting general manager (GM) with overall authority for Biometra’s operations.   The “vice president who would have overseen the catheter product launched had left abruptly to join a startup device company.”  “A number of key Biometra managers had departed as well.”  Even though there were “many other SciMat product launches in progress,” this was an urgent, “high profile” product launch for Biometra.  For Erik Peterson, this was an opportunity of a lifetime and he was “both excited and daunted by this opportunity to have general management experience so early in his career.”

One caution as you approach this assignment.  Please do not fall into the trap of blaming others for Erik Peterson’s failure.  This is a course in managing people and organizations and in each module we study how to become a better manager and leader.  Unexpected things do happen – key people leave, problems arise, personality conflicts surface, competition changes, etc.  It’s true that that personnel issues and problems throughout the company resulted in Erik Peterson not having the mentoring he expected. However, there was so much more that Erik Peterson could have done. He could have at least picked up the phone and asked Richard Jenkins for help.  

12.2 Who Is a Leader? Trait Approaches to Leadership

12.3 What Do Leaders Do? Behavioral Approaches to Leadership

12.4 What Is the Role of the Context? Contingency Approaches to Leadership

12.5 What’s New? Contemporary Approaches to Leadership

Knowing what actually happened before submitting your written case study analysis makes this assignment a bit different that the rest of the case studies assigned in this course.  Instead of explaining what the protagonist should do, in this assignment you will need to explain what Erik Peterson should have done to apply the leadership principles we studied to have achieved a successful outcome.

Thoughtfully consider what Richard Jenkins expected Erik Peterson to do when he promoted him to acting general manager (GM) with overall authority for Biometra’s operations.   The “vice president who would have overseen the catheter product launched had left abruptly to join a startup device company.”  “A number of key Biometra managers had departed as well.”  Even though there were “many other SciMat product launches in progress,” this was an urgent, “high profile” product launch for Biometra.  For Erik Peterson, this was an opportunity of a lifetime and he was “both excited and daunted by this opportunity to have general management experience so early in his career.”

One caution as you approach this assignment.  Please do not fall into the trap of blaming others for Erik Peterson’s failure.  This is a course in managing people and organizations and in each module we study how to become a better manager and leader.  Unexpected things do happen – key people leave, problems arise, personality conflicts surface, competition changes, etc.  It’s true that that personnel issues and problems throughout the company resulted in Erik Peterson not having the mentoring he expected. However, there was so much more that Erik Peterson could have done. He could have at least picked up the phone and asked Richard Jenkins for help.  

12.2 Who Is a Leader? Trait Approaches to Leadership

12.3 What Do Leaders Do? Behavioral Approaches to Leadership

12.4 What Is the Role of the Context? Contingency Approaches to Leadership

12.5 What’s New? Contemporary Approaches to Leadership

Knowing what actually happened before submitting your written case study analysis makes this assignment a bit different that the rest of the case studies assigned in this course.  Instead of explaining what the protagonist should do, in this assignment you will need to explain what Erik Peterson should have done to apply the leadership principles we studied to have achieved a successful outcome.

Thoughtfully consider what Richard Jenkins expected Erik Peterson to do when he promoted him to acting general manager (GM) with overall authority for Biometra’s operations.   The “vice president who would have overseen the catheter product launched had left abruptly to join a startup device company.”  “A number of key Biometra managers had departed as well.”  Even though there were “many other SciMat product launches in progress,” this was an urgent, “high profile” product launch for Biometra.  For Erik Peterson, this was an opportunity of a lifetime and he was “both excited and daunted by this opportunity to have general management experience so early in his career.”

One caution as you approach this assignment.  Please do not fall into the trap of blaming others for Erik Peterson’s failure.  This is a course in managing people and organizations and in each module we study how to become a better manager and leader.  Unexpected things do happen – key people leave, problems arise, personality conflicts surface, competition changes, etc.  It’s true that that personnel issues and problems throughout the company resulted in Erik Peterson not having the mentoring he expected. However, there was so much more that Erik Peterson could have done. He could have at least picked up the phone and asked Richard Jenkins for help.  

12.2 Who Is a Leader? Trait Approaches to Leadership

12.3 What Do Leaders Do? Behavioral Approaches to Leadership

12.4 What Is the Role of the Context? Contingency Approaches to Leadership

12.5 What’s New? Contemporary Approaches to Leadership

Knowing what actually happened before submitting your written case study analysis makes this assignment a bit different that the rest of the case studies assigned in this course.  Instead of explaining what the protagonist should do, in this assignment you will need to explain what Erik Peterson should have done to apply the leadership principles we studied to have achieved a successful outcome.

Thoughtfully consider what Richard Jenkins expected Erik Peterson to do when he promoted him to acting general manager (GM) with overall authority for Biometra’s operations.   The “vice president who would have overseen the catheter product launched had left abruptly to join a startup device company.”  “A number of key Biometra managers had departed as well.”  Even though there were “many other SciMat product launches in progress,” this was an urgent, “high profile” product launch for Biometra.  For Erik Peterson, this was an opportunity of a lifetime and he was “both excited and daunted by this opportunity to have general management experience so early in his career.”

One caution as you approach this assignment.  Please do not fall into the trap of blaming others for Erik Peterson’s failure.  This is a course in managing people and organizations and in each module we study how to become a better manager and leader.  Unexpected things do happen – key people leave, problems arise, personality conflicts surface, competition changes, etc.  It’s true that that personnel issues and problems throughout the company resulted in Erik Peterson not having the mentoring he expected. However, there was so much more that Erik Peterson could have done. He could have at least picked up the phone and asked Richard Jenkins for help.  

12.2 Who Is a Leader? Trait Approaches to Leadership

12.3 What Do Leaders Do? Behavioral Approaches to Leadership

12.4 What Is the Role of the Context? Contingency Approaches to Leadership

12.5 What’s New? Contemporary Approaches to Leadership

Knowing what actually happened before submitting your written case study analysis makes this assignment a bit different that the rest of the case studies assigned in this course.  Instead of explaining what the protagonist should do, in this assignment you will need to explain what Erik Peterson should have done to apply the leadership principles we studied to have achieved a successful outcome.

Thoughtfully consider what Richard Jenkins expected Erik Peterson to do when he promoted him to acting general manager (GM) with overall authority for Biometra’s operations.   The “vice president who would have overseen the catheter product launched had left abruptly to join a startup device company.”  “A number of key Biometra managers had departed as well.”  Even though there were “many other SciMat product launches in progress,” this was an urgent, “high profile” product launch for Biometra.  For Erik Peterson, this was an opportunity of a lifetime and he was “both excited and daunted by this opportunity to have general management experience so early in his career.”

One caution as you approach this assignment.  Please do not fall into the trap of blaming others for Erik Peterson’s failure.  This is a course in managing people and organizations and in each module we study how to become a better manager and leader.  Unexpected things do happen – key people leave, problems arise, personality conflicts surface, competition changes, etc.  It’s true that that personnel issues and problems throughout the company resulted in Erik Peterson not having the mentoring he expected. However, there was so much more that Erik Peterson could have done. He could have at least picked up the phone and asked Richard Jenkins for help.  

12.2 Who Is a Leader? Trait Approaches to Leadership

12.3 What Do Leaders Do? Behavioral Approaches to Leadership

12.4 What Is the Role of the Context? Contingency Approaches to Leadership

12.5 What’s New? Contemporary Approaches to Leadership

Knowing what actually happened before submitting your written case study analysis makes this assignment a bit different that the rest of the case studies assigned in this course.  Instead of explaining what the protagonist should do, in this assignment you will need to explain what Erik Peterson should have done to apply the leadership principles we studied to have achieved a successful outcome.

Thoughtfully consider what Richard Jenkins expected Erik Peterson to do when he promoted him to acting general manager (GM) with overall authority for Biometra’s operations.   The “vice president who would have overseen the catheter product launched had left abruptly to join a startup device company.”  “A number of key Biometra managers had departed as well.”  Even though there were “many other SciMat product launches in progress,” this was an urgent, “high profile” product launch for Biometra.  For Erik Peterson, this was an opportunity of a lifetime and he was “both excited and daunted by this opportunity to have general management experience so early in his career.”

One caution as you approach this assignment.  Please do not fall into the trap of blaming others for Erik Peterson’s failure.  This is a course in managing people and organizations and in each module we study how to become a better manager and leader.  Unexpected things do happen – key people leave, problems arise, personality conflicts surface, competition changes, etc.  It’s true that that personnel issues and problems throughout the company resulted in Erik Peterson not having the mentoring he expected. However, there was so much more that Erik Peterson could have done. He could have at least picked up the phone and asked Richard Jenkins for help.  

12.2 Who Is a Leader? Trait Approaches to Leadership

12.3 What Do Leaders Do? Behavioral Approaches to Leadership

12.4 What Is the Role of the Context? Contingency Approaches to Leadership

12.5 What’s New? Contemporary Approaches to Leadership

Knowing what actually happened before submitting your written case study analysis makes this assignment a bit different that the rest of the case studies assigned in this course.  Instead of explaining what the protagonist should do, in this assignment you will need to explain what Erik Peterson should have done to apply the leadership principles we studied to have achieved a successful outcome.

Thoughtfully consider what Richard Jenkins expected Erik Peterson to do when he promoted him to acting general manager (GM) with overall authority for Biometra’s operations.   The “vice president who would have overseen the catheter product launched had left abruptly to join a startup device company.”  “A number of key Biometra managers had departed as well.”  Even though there were “many other SciMat product launches in progress,” this was an urgent, “high profile” product launch for Biometra.  For Erik Peterson, this was an opportunity of a lifetime and he was “both excited and daunted by this opportunity to have general management experience so early in his career.”

One caution as you approach this assignment.  Please do not fall into the trap of blaming others for Erik Peterson’s failure.  This is a course in managing people and organizations and in each module we study how to become a better manager and leader.  Unexpected things do happen – key people leave, problems arise, personality conflicts surface, competition changes, etc.  It’s true that that personnel issues and problems throughout the company resulted in Erik Peterson not having the mentoring he expected. However, there was so much more that Erik Peterson could have done. He could have at least picked up the phone and asked Richard Jenkins for help.  

12.2 Who Is a Leader? Trait Approaches to Leadership

12.3 What Do Leaders Do? Behavioral Approaches to Leadership

12.4 What Is the Role of the Context? Contingency Approaches to Leadership

12.5 What’s New? Contemporary Approaches to Leadership

Knowing what actually happened before submitting your written case study analysis makes this assignment a bit different that the rest of the case studies assigned in this course.  Instead of explaining what the protagonist should do, in this assignment you will need to explain what Erik Peterson should have done to apply the leadership principles we studied to have achieved a successful outcome.

Thoughtfully consider what Richard Jenkins expected Erik Peterson to do when he promoted him to acting general manager (GM) with overall authority for Biometra’s operations.   The “vice president who would have overseen the catheter product launched had left abruptly to join a startup device company.”  “A number of key Biometra managers had departed as well.”  Even though there were “many other SciMat product launches in progress,” this was an urgent, “high profile” product launch for Biometra.  For Erik Peterson, this was an opportunity of a lifetime and he was “both excited and daunted by this opportunity to have general management experience so early in his career.”

One caution as you approach this assignment.  Please do not fall into the trap of blaming others for Erik Peterson’s failure.  This is a course in managing people and organizations and in each module we study how to become a better manager and leader.  Unexpected things do happen – key people leave, problems arise, personality conflicts surface, competition changes, etc.  It’s true that that personnel issues and problems throughout the company resulted in Erik Peterson not having the mentoring he expected. However, there was so much more that Erik Peterson could have done. He could have at least picked up the phone and asked Richard Jenkins for help.  

12.2 Who Is a Leader? Trait Approaches to Leadership

12.3 What Do Leaders Do? Behavioral Approaches to Leadership

12.4 What Is the Role of the Context? Contingency Approaches to Leadership

12.5 What’s New? Contemporary Approaches to Leadership

Knowing what actually happened before submitting your written case study analysis makes this assignment a bit different that the rest of the case studies assigned in this course.  Instead of explaining what the protagonist should do, in this assignment you will need to explain what Erik Peterson should have done to apply the leadership principles we studied to have achieved a successful outcome.

Thoughtfully consider what Richard Jenkins expected Erik Peterson to do when he promoted him to acting general manager (GM) with overall authority for Biometra’s operations.   The “vice president who would have overseen the catheter product launched had left abruptly to join a startup device company.”  “A number of key Biometra managers had departed as well.”  Even though there were “many other SciMat product launches in progress,” this was an urgent, “high profile” product launch for Biometra.  For Erik Peterson, this was an opportunity of a lifetime and he was “both excited and daunted by this opportunity to have general management experience so early in his career.”

One caution as you approach this assignment.  Please do not fall into the trap of blaming others for Erik Peterson’s failure.  This is a course in managing people and organizations and in each module we study how to become a better manager and leader.  Unexpected things do happen – key people leave, problems arise, personality conflicts surface, competition changes, etc.  It’s true that that personnel issues and problems throughout the company resulted in Erik Peterson not having the mentoring he expected. However, there was so much more that Erik Peterson could have done. He could have at least picked up the phone and asked Richard Jenkins for help.  

12.2 Who Is a Leader? Trait Approaches to Leadership

12.3 What Do Leaders Do? Behavioral Approaches to Leadership

12.4 What Is the Role of the Context? Contingency Approaches to Leadership

12.5 What’s New? Contemporary Approaches to Leadership

Knowing what actually happened before submitting your written case study analysis makes this assignment a bit different that the rest of the case studies assigned in this course.  Instead of explaining what the protagonist should do, in this assignment you will need to explain what Erik Peterson should have done to apply the leadership principles we studied to have achieved a successful outcome.

Thoughtfully consider what Richard Jenkins expected Erik Peterson to do when he promoted him to acting general manager (GM) with overall authority for Biometra’s operations.   The “vice president who would have overseen the catheter product launched had left abruptly to join a startup device company.”  “A number of key Biometra managers had departed as well.”  Even though there were “many other SciMat product launches in progress,” this was an urgent, “high profile” product launch for Biometra.  For Erik Peterson, this was an opportunity of a lifetime and he was “both excited and daunted by this opportunity to have general management experience so early in his career.”

One caution as you approach this assignment.  Please do not fall into the trap of blaming others for Erik Peterson’s failure.  This is a course in managing people and organizations and in each module we study how to become a better manager and leader.  Unexpected things do happen – key people leave, problems arise, personality conflicts surface, competition changes, etc.  It’s true that that personnel issues and problems throughout the company resulted in Erik Peterson not having the mentoring he expected. However, there was so much more that Erik Peterson could have done. He could have at least picked up the phone and asked Richard Jenkins for help.  

12.2 Who Is a Leader? Trait Approaches to Leadership

12.3 What Do Leaders Do? Behavioral Approaches to Leadership

12.4 What Is the Role of the Context? Contingency Approaches to Leadership

12.5 What’s New? Contemporary Approaches to Leadership

Knowing what actually happened before submitting your written case study analysis makes this assignment a bit different that the rest of the case studies assigned in this course.  Instead of explaining what the protagonist should do, in this assignment you will need to explain what Erik Peterson should have done to apply the leadership principles we studied to have achieved a successful outcome.

Thoughtfully consider what Richard Jenkins expected Erik Peterson to do when he promoted him to acting general manager (GM) with overall authority for Biometra’s operations.   The “vice president who would have overseen the catheter product launched had left abruptly to join a startup device company.”  “A number of key Biometra managers had departed as well.”  Even though there were “many other SciMat product launches in progress,” this was an urgent, “high profile” product launch for Biometra.  For Erik Peterson, this was an opportunity of a lifetime and he was “both excited and daunted by this opportunity to have general management experience so early in his career.”

One caution as you approach this assignment.  Please do not fall into the trap of blaming others for Erik Peterson’s failure.  This is a course in managing people and organizations and in each module we study how to become a better manager and leader.  Unexpected things do happen – key people leave, problems arise, personality conflicts surface, competition changes, etc.  It’s true that that personnel issues and problems throughout the company resulted in Erik Peterson not having the mentoring he expected. However, there was so much more that Erik Peterson could have done. He could have at least picked up the phone and asked Richard Jenkins for help.  

12.2 Who Is a Leader? Trait Approaches to Leadership

12.3 What Do Leaders Do? Behavioral Approaches to Leadership

12.4 What Is the Role of the Context? Contingency Approaches to Leadership

12.5 What’s New? Contemporary Approaches to Leadership

Knowing what actually happened before submitting your written case study analysis makes this assignment a bit different that the rest of the case studies assigned in this course.  Instead of explaining what the protagonist should do, in this assignment you will need to explain what Erik Peterson should have done to apply the leadership principles we studied to have achieved a successful outcome.

Thoughtfully consider what Richard Jenkins expected Erik Peterson to do when he promoted him to acting general manager (GM) with overall authority for Biometra’s operations.   The “vice president who would have overseen the catheter product launched had left abruptly to join a startup device company.”  “A number of key Biometra managers had departed as well.”  Even though there were “many other SciMat product launches in progress,” this was an urgent, “high profile” product launch for Biometra.  For Erik Peterson, this was an opportunity of a lifetime and he was “both excited and daunted by this opportunity to have general management experience so early in his career.”

One caution as you approach this assignment.  Please do not fall into the trap of blaming others for Erik Peterson’s failure.  This is a course in managing people and organizations and in each module we study how to become a better manager and leader.  Unexpected things do happen – key people leave, problems arise, personality conflicts surface, competition changes, etc.  It’s true that that personnel issues and problems throughout the company resulted in Erik Peterson not having the mentoring he expected. However, there was so much more that Erik Peterson could have done. He could have at least picked up the phone and asked Richard Jenkins for help.  

12.2 Who Is a Leader? Trait Approaches to Leadership

12.3 What Do Leaders Do? Behavioral Approaches to Leadership

12.4 What Is the Role of the Context? Contingency Approaches to Leadership

12.5 What’s New? Contemporary Approaches to Leadership

Knowing what actually happened before submitting your written case study analysis makes this assignment a bit different that the rest of the case studies assigned in this course.  Instead of explaining what the protagonist should do, in this assignment you will need to explain what Erik Peterson should have done to apply the leadership principles we studied to have achieved a successful outcome.

Thoughtfully consider what Richard Jenkins expected Erik Peterson to do when he promoted him to acting general manager (GM) with overall authority for Biometra’s operations.   The “vice president who would have overseen the catheter product launched had left abruptly to join a startup device company.”  “A number of key Biometra managers had departed as well.”  Even though there were “many other SciMat product launches in progress,” this was an urgent, “high profile” product launch for Biometra.  For Erik Peterson, this was an opportunity of a lifetime and he was “both excited and daunted by this opportunity to have general management experience so early in his career.”

One caution as you approach this assignment.  Please do not fall into the trap of blaming others for Erik Peterson’s failure.  This is a course in managing people and organizations and in each module we study how to become a better manager and leader.  Unexpected things do happen – key people leave, problems arise, personality conflicts surface, competition changes, etc.  It’s true that that personnel issues and problems throughout the company resulted in Erik Peterson not having the mentoring he expected. However, there was so much more that Erik Peterson could have done. He could have at least picked up the phone and asked Richard Jenkins for help.  

12.2 Who Is a Leader? Trait Approaches to Leadership

12.3 What Do Leaders Do? Behavioral Approaches to Leadership

12.4 What Is the Role of the Context? Contingency Approaches to Leadership

12.5 What’s New? Contemporary Approaches to Leadership

Knowing what actually happened before submitting your written case study analysis makes this assignment a bit different that the rest of the case studies assigned in this course.  Instead of explaining what the protagonist should do, in this assignment you will need to explain what Erik Peterson should have done to apply the leadership principles we studied to have achieved a successful outcome.

Thoughtfully consider what Richard Jenkins expected Erik Peterson to do when he promoted him to acting general manager (GM) with overall authority for Biometra’s operations.   The “vice president who would have overseen the catheter product launched had left abruptly to join a startup device company.”  “A number of key Biometra managers had departed as well.”  Even though there were “many other SciMat product launches in progress,” this was an urgent, “high profile” product launch for Biometra.  For Erik Peterson, this was an opportunity of a lifetime and he was “both excited and daunted by this opportunity to have general management experience so early in his career.”

One caution as you approach this assignment.  Please do not fall into the trap of blaming others for Erik Peterson’s failure.  This is a course in managing people and organizations and in each module we study how to become a better manager and leader.  Unexpected things do happen – key people leave, problems arise, personality conflicts surface, competition changes, etc.  It’s true that that personnel issues and problems throughout the company resulted in Erik Peterson not having the mentoring he expected. However, there was so much more that Erik Peterson could have done. He could have at least picked up the phone and asked Richard Jenkins for help.  

12.2 Who Is a Leader? Trait Approaches to Leadership

12.3 What Do Leaders Do? Behavioral Approaches to Leadership

12.4 What Is the Role of the Context? Contingency Approaches to Leadership

12.5 What’s New? Contemporary Approaches to Leadership

Knowing what actually happened before submitting your written case study analysis makes this assignment a bit different that the rest of the case studies assigned in this course.  Instead of explaining what the protagonist should do, in this assignment you will need to explain what Erik Peterson should have done to apply the leadership principles we studied to have achieved a successful outcome.

Thoughtfully consider what Richard Jenkins expected Erik Peterson to do when he promoted him to acting general manager (GM) with overall authority for Biometra’s operations.   The “vice president who would have overseen the catheter product launched had left abruptly to join a startup device company.”  “A number of key Biometra managers had departed as well.”  Even though there were “many other SciMat product launches in progress,” this was an urgent, “high profile” product launch for Biometra.  For Erik Peterson, this was an opportunity of a lifetime and he was “both excited and daunted by this opportunity to have general management experience so early in his career.”

One caution as you approach this assignment.  Please do not fall into the trap of blaming others for Erik Peterson’s failure.  This is a course in managing people and organizations and in each module we study how to become a better manager and leader.  Unexpected things do happen – key people leave, problems arise, personality conflicts surface, competition changes, etc.  It’s true that that personnel issues and problems throughout the company resulted in Erik Peterson not having the mentoring he expected. However, there was so much more that Erik Peterson could have done. He could have at least picked up the phone and asked Richard Jenkins for help.  

12.2 Who Is a Leader? Trait Approaches to Leadership

12.3 What Do Leaders Do? Behavioral Approaches to Leadership

12.4 What Is the Role of the Context? Contingency Approaches to Leadership

12.5 What’s New? Contemporary Approaches to Leadership

Knowing what actually happened before submitting your written case study analysis makes this assignment a bit different that the rest of the case studies assigned in this course.  Instead of explaining what the protagonist should do, in this assignment you will need to explain what Erik Peterson should have done to apply the leadership principles we studied to have achieved a successful outcome.

Thoughtfully consider what Richard Jenkins expected Erik Peterson to do when he promoted him to acting general manager (GM) with overall authority for Biometra’s operations.   The “vice president who would have overseen the catheter product launched had left abruptly to join a startup device company.”  “A number of key Biometra managers had departed as well.”  Even though there were “many other SciMat product launches in progress,” this was an urgent, “high profile” product launch for Biometra.  For Erik Peterson, this was an opportunity of a lifetime and he was “both excited and daunted by this opportunity to have general management experience so early in his career.”

One caution as you approach this assignment.  Please do not fall into the trap of blaming others for Erik Peterson’s failure.  This is a course in managing people and organizations and in each module we study how to become a better manager and leader.  Unexpected things do happen – key people leave, problems arise, personality conflicts surface, competition changes, etc.  It’s true that that personnel issues and problems throughout the company resulted in Erik Peterson not having the mentoring he expected. However, there was so much more that Erik Peterson could have done. He could have at least picked up the phone and asked Richard Jenkins for help.  

12.2 Who Is a Leader? Trait Approaches to Leadership

12.3 What Do Leaders Do? Behavioral Approaches to Leadership

12.4 What Is the Role of the Context? Contingency Approaches to Leadership

12.5 What’s New? Contemporary Approaches to Leadership

Knowing what actually happened before submitting your written case study analysis makes this assignment a bit different that the rest of the case studies assigned in this course.  Instead of explaining what the protagonist should do, in this assignment you will need to explain what Erik Peterson should have done to apply the leadership principles we studied to have achieved a successful outcome.

Thoughtfully consider what Richard Jenkins expected Erik Peterson to do when he promoted him to acting general manager (GM) with overall authority for Biometra’s operations.   The “vice president who would have overseen the catheter product launched had left abruptly to join a startup device company.”  “A number of key Biometra managers had departed as well.”  Even though there were “many other SciMat product launches in progress,” this was an urgent, “high profile” product launch for Biometra.  For Erik Peterson, this was an opportunity of a lifetime and he was “both excited and daunted by this opportunity to have general management experience so early in his career.”

One caution as you approach this assignment.  Please do not fall into the trap of blaming others for Erik Peterson’s failure.  This is a course in managing people and organizations and in each module we study how to become a better manager and leader.  Unexpected things do happen – key people leave, problems arise, personality conflicts surface, competition changes, etc.  It’s true that that personnel issues and problems throughout the company resulted in Erik Peterson not having the mentoring he expected. However, there was so much more that Erik Peterson could have done. He could have at least picked up the phone and asked Richard Jenkins for help.  

12.2 Who Is a Leader? Trait Approaches to Leadership

12.3 What Do Leaders Do? Behavioral Approaches to Leadership

12.4 What Is the Role of the Context? Contingency Approaches to Leadership

12.5 What’s New? Contemporary Approaches to Leadership

Knowing what actually happened before submitting your written case study analysis makes this assignment a bit different that the rest of the case studies assigned in this course.  Instead of explaining what the protagonist should do, in this assignment you will need to explain what Erik Peterson should have done to apply the leadership principles we studied to have achieved a successful outcome.

Thoughtfully consider what Richard Jenkins expected Erik Peterson to do when he promoted him to acting general manager (GM) with overall authority for Biometra’s operations.   The “vice president who would have overseen the catheter product launched had left abruptly to join a startup device company.”  “A number of key Biometra managers had departed as well.”  Even though there were “many other SciMat product launches in progress,” this was an urgent, “high profile” product launch for Biometra.  For Erik Peterson, this was an opportunity of a lifetime and he was “both excited and daunted by this opportunity to have general management experience so early in his career.”

One caution as you approach this assignment.  Please do not fall into the trap of blaming others for Erik Peterson’s failure.  This is a course in managing people and organizations and in each module we study how to become a better manager and leader.  Unexpected things do happen – key people leave, problems arise, personality conflicts surface, competition changes, etc.  It’s true that that personnel issues and problems throughout the company resulted in Erik Peterson not having the mentoring he expected. However, there was so much more that Erik Peterson could have done. He could have at least picked up the phone and asked Richard Jenkins for help.  

12.2 Who Is a Leader? Trait Approaches to Leadership

12.3 What Do Leaders Do? Behavioral Approaches to Leadership

12.4 What Is the Role of the Context? Contingency Approaches to Leadership

12.5 What’s New? Contemporary Approaches to Leadership

Knowing what actually happened before submitting your written case study analysis makes this assignment a bit different that the rest of the case studies assigned in this course.  Instead of explaining what the protagonist should do, in this assignment you will need to explain what Erik Peterson should have done to apply the leadership principles we studied to have achieved a successful outcome.

Thoughtfully consider what Richard Jenkins expected Erik Peterson to do when he promoted him to acting general manager (GM) with overall authority for Biometra’s operations.   The “vice president who would have overseen the catheter product launched had left abruptly to join a startup device company.”  “A number of key Biometra managers had departed as well.”  Even though there were “many other SciMat product launches in progress,” this was an urgent, “high profile” product launch for Biometra.  For Erik Peterson, this was an opportunity of a lifetime and he was “both excited and daunted by this opportunity to have general management experience so early in his career.”

One caution as you approach this assignment.  Please do not fall into the trap of blaming others for Erik Peterson’s failure.  This is a course in managing people and organizations and in each module we study how to become a better manager and leader.  Unexpected things do happen – key people leave, problems arise, personality conflicts surface, competition changes, etc.  It’s true that that personnel issues and problems throughout the company resulted in Erik Peterson not having the mentoring he expected. However, there was so much more that Erik Peterson could have done. He could have at least picked up the phone and asked Richard Jenkins for help.  

12.2 Who Is a Leader? Trait Approaches to Leadership

12.3 What Do Leaders Do? Behavioral Approaches to Leadership

12.4 What Is the Role of the Context? Contingency Approaches to Leadership

12.5 What’s New? Contemporary Approaches to Leadership

Knowing what actually happened before submitting your written case study analysis makes this assignment a bit different that the rest of the case studies assigned in this course.  Instead of explaining what the protagonist should do, in this assignment you will need to explain what Erik Peterson should have done to apply the leadership principles we studied to have achieved a successful outcome.

Thoughtfully consider what Richard Jenkins expected Erik Peterson to do when he promoted him to acting general manager (GM) with overall authority for Biometra’s operations.   The “vice president who would have overseen the catheter product launched had left abruptly to join a startup device company.”  “A number of key Biometra managers had departed as well.”  Even though there were “many other SciMat product launches in progress,” this was an urgent, “high profile” product launch for Biometra.  For Erik Peterson, this was an opportunity of a lifetime and he was “both excited and daunted by this opportunity to have general management experience so early in his career.”

One caution as you approach this assignment.  Please do not fall into the trap of blaming others for Erik Peterson’s failure.  This is a course in managing people and organizations and in each module we study how to become a better manager and leader.  Unexpected things do happen – key people leave, problems arise, personality conflicts surface, competition changes, etc.  It’s true that that personnel issues and problems throughout the company resulted in Erik Peterson not having the mentoring he expected. However, there was so much more that Erik Peterson could have done. He could have at least picked up the phone and asked Richard Jenkins for help.  

12.2 Who Is a Leader? Trait Approaches to Leadership

12.3 What Do Leaders Do? Behavioral Approaches to Leadership

12.4 What Is the Role of the Context? Contingency Approaches to Leadership

12.5 What’s New? Contemporary Approaches to Leadership

Knowing what actually happened before submitting your written case study analysis makes this assignment a bit different that the rest of the case studies assigned in this course.  Instead of explaining what the protagonist should do, in this assignment you will need to explain what Erik Peterson should have done to apply the leadership principles we studied to have achieved a successful outcome.

Thoughtfully consider what Richard Jenkins expected Erik Peterson to do when he promoted him to acting general manager (GM) with overall authority for Biometra’s operations.   The “vice president who would have overseen the catheter product launched had left abruptly to join a startup device company.”  “A number of key Biometra managers had departed as well.”  Even though there were “many other SciMat product launches in progress,” this was an urgent, “high profile” product launch for Biometra.  For Erik Peterson, this was an opportunity of a lifetime and he was “both excited and daunted by this opportunity to have general management experience so early in his career.”

One caution as you approach this assignment.  Please do not fall into the trap of blaming others for Erik Peterson’s failure.  This is a course in managing people and organizations and in each module we study how to become a better manager and leader.  Unexpected things do happen – key people leave, problems arise, personality conflicts surface, competition changes, etc.  It’s true that that personnel issues and problems throughout the company resulted in Erik Peterson not having the mentoring he expected. However, there was so much more that Erik Peterson could have done. He could have at least picked up the phone and asked Richard Jenkins for help.  

12.2 Who Is a Leader? Trait Approaches to Leadership

12.3 What Do Leaders Do? Behavioral Approaches to Leadership

12.4 What Is the Role of the Context? Contingency Approaches to Leadership

12.5 What’s New? Contemporary Approaches to Leadership

Knowing what actually happened before submitting your written case study analysis makes this assignment a bit different that the rest of the case studies assigned in this course.  Instead of explaining what the protagonist should do, in this assignment you will need to explain what Erik Peterson should have done to apply the leadership principles we studied to have achieved a successful outcome.

Thoughtfully consider what Richard Jenkins expected Erik Peterson to do when he promoted him to acting general manager (GM) with overall authority for Biometra’s operations.   The “vice president who would have overseen the catheter product launched had left abruptly to join a startup device company.”  “A number of key Biometra managers had departed as well.”  Even though there were “many other SciMat product launches in progress,” this was an urgent, “high profile” product launch for Biometra.  For Erik Peterson, this was an opportunity of a lifetime and he was “both excited and daunted by this opportunity to have general management experience so early in his career.”

One caution as you approach this assignment.  Please do not fall into the trap of blaming others for Erik Peterson’s failure.  This is a course in managing people and organizations and in each module we study how to become a better manager and leader.  Unexpected things do happen – key people leave, problems arise, personality conflicts surface, competition changes, etc.  It’s true that that personnel issues and problems throughout the company resulted in Erik Peterson not having the mentoring he expected. However, there was so much more that Erik Peterson could have done. He could have at least picked up the phone and asked Richard Jenkins for help.  

12.2 Who Is a Leader? Trait Approaches to Leadership

12.3 What Do Leaders Do? Behavioral Approaches to Leadership

12.4 What Is the Role of the Context? Contingency Approaches to Leadership

12.5 What’s New? Contemporary Approaches to Leadership

Knowing what actually happened before submitting your written case study analysis makes this assignment a bit different that the rest of the case studies assigned in this course.  Instead of explaining what the protagonist should do, in this assignment you will need to explain what Erik Peterson should have done to apply the leadership principles we studied to have achieved a successful outcome.

Thoughtfully consider what Richard Jenkins expected Erik Peterson to do when he promoted him to acting general manager (GM) with overall authority for Biometra’s operations.   The “vice president who would have overseen the catheter product launched had left abruptly to join a startup device company.”  “A number of key Biometra managers had departed as well.”  Even though there were “many other SciMat product launches in progress,” this was an urgent, “high profile” product launch for Biometra.  For Erik Peterson, this was an opportunity of a lifetime and he was “both excited and daunted by this opportunity to have general management experience so early in his career.”

One caution as you approach this assignment.  Please do not fall into the trap of blaming others for Erik Peterson’s failure.  This is a course in managing people and organizations and in each module we study how to become a better manager and leader.  Unexpected things do happen – key people leave, problems arise, personality conflicts surface, competition changes, etc.  It’s true that that personnel issues and problems throughout the company resulted in Erik Peterson not having the mentoring he expected. However, there was so much more that Erik Peterson could have done. He could have at least picked up the phone and asked Richard Jenkins for help.  

12.2 Who Is a Leader? Trait Approaches to Leadership

12.3 What Do Leaders Do? Behavioral Approaches to Leadership

12.4 What Is the Role of the Context? Contingency Approaches to Leadership

12.5 What’s New? Contemporary Approaches to Leadership

Knowing what actually happened before submitting your written case study analysis makes this assignment a bit different that the rest of the case studies assigned in this course.  Instead of explaining what the protagonist should do, in this assignment you will need to explain what Erik Peterson should have done to apply the leadership principles we studied to have achieved a successful outcome.

Thoughtfully consider what Richard Jenkins expected Erik Peterson to do when he promoted him to acting general manager (GM) with overall authority for Biometra’s operations.   The “vice president who would have overseen the catheter product launched had left abruptly to join a startup device company.”  “A number of key Biometra managers had departed as well.”  Even though there were “many other SciMat product launches in progress,” this was an urgent, “high profile” product launch for Biometra.  For Erik Peterson, this was an opportunity of a lifetime and he was “both excited and daunted by this opportunity to have general management experience so early in his career.”

One caution as you approach this assignment.  Please do not fall into the trap of blaming others for Erik Peterson’s failure.  This is a course in managing people and organizations and in each module we study how to become a better manager and leader.  Unexpected things do happen – key people leave, problems arise, personality conflicts surface, competition changes, etc.  It’s true that that personnel issues and problems throughout the company resulted in Erik Peterson not having the mentoring he expected. However, there was so much more that Erik Peterson could have done. He could have at least picked up the phone and asked Richard Jenkins for help.  

12.2 Who Is a Leader? Trait Approaches to Leadership

12.3 What Do Leaders Do? Behavioral Approaches to Leadership

12.4 What Is the Role of the Context? Contingency Approaches to Leadership

12.5 What’s New? Contemporary Approaches to Leadership

Knowing what actually happened before submitting your written case study analysis makes this assignment a bit different that the rest of the case studies assigned in this course.  Instead of explaining what the protagonist should do, in this assignment you will need to explain what Erik Peterson should have done to apply the leadership principles we studied to have achieved a successful outcome.

Thoughtfully consider what Richard Jenkins expected Erik Peterson to do when he promoted him to acting general manager (GM) with overall authority for Biometra’s operations.   The “vice president who would have overseen the catheter product launched had left abruptly to join a startup device company.”  “A number of key Biometra managers had departed as well.”  Even though there were “many other SciMat product launches in progress,” this was an urgent, “high profile” product launch for Biometra.  For Erik Peterson, this was an opportunity of a lifetime and he was “both excited and daunted by this opportunity to have general management experience so early in his career.”

One caution as you approach this assignment.  Please do not fall into the trap of blaming others for Erik Peterson’s failure.  This is a course in managing people and organizations and in each module we study how to become a better manager and leader.  Unexpected things do happen – key people leave, problems arise, personality conflicts surface, competition changes, etc.  It’s true that that personnel issues and problems throughout the company resulted in Erik Peterson not having the mentoring he expected. However, there was so much more that Erik Peterson could have done. He could have at least picked up the phone and asked Richard Jenkins for help.  

12.2 Who Is a Leader? Trait Approaches to Leadership

12.3 What Do Leaders Do? Behavioral Approaches to Leadership

12.4 What Is the Role of the Context? Contingency Approaches to Leadership

12.5 What’s New? Contemporary Approaches to Leadership

Knowing what actually happened before submitting your written case study analysis makes this assignment a bit different that the rest of the case studies assigned in this course.  Instead of explaining what the protagonist should do, in this assignment you will need to explain what Erik Peterson should have done to apply the leadership principles we studied to have achieved a successful outcome.

Thoughtfully consider what Richard Jenkins expected Erik Peterson to do when he promoted him to acting general manager (GM) with overall authority for Biometra’s operations.   The “vice president who would have overseen the catheter product launched had left abruptly to join a startup device company.”  “A number of key Biometra managers had departed as well.”  Even though there were “many other SciMat product launches in progress,” this was an urgent, “high profile” product launch for Biometra.  For Erik Peterson, this was an opportunity of a lifetime and he was “both excited and daunted by this opportunity to have general management experience so early in his career.”

One caution as you approach this assignment.  Please do not fall into the trap of blaming others for Erik Peterson’s failure.  This is a course in managing people and organizations and in each module we study how to become a better manager and leader.  Unexpected things do happen – key people leave, problems arise, personality conflicts surface, competition changes, etc.  It’s true that that personnel issues and problems throughout the company resulted in Erik Peterson not having the mentoring he expected. However, there was so much more that Erik Peterson could have done. He could have at least picked up the phone and asked Richard Jenkins for help.  

12.2 Who Is a Leader? Trait Approaches to Leadership

12.3 What Do Leaders Do? Behavioral Approaches to Leadership

12.4 What Is the Role of the Context? Contingency Approaches to Leadership

12.5 What’s New? Contemporary Approaches to Leadership

Knowing what actually happened before submitting your written case study analysis makes this assignment a bit different that the rest of the case studies assigned in this course.  Instead of explaining what the protagonist should do, in this assignment you will need to explain what Erik Peterson should have done to apply the leadership principles we studied to have achieved a successful outcome.

Thoughtfully consider what Richard Jenkins expected Erik Peterson to do when he promoted him to acting general manager (GM) with overall authority for Biometra’s operations.   The “vice president who would have overseen the catheter product launched had left abruptly to join a startup device company.”  “A number of key Biometra managers had departed as well.”  Even though there were “many other SciMat product launches in progress,” this was an urgent, “high profile” product launch for Biometra.  For Erik Peterson, this was an opportunity of a lifetime and he was “both excited and daunted by this opportunity to have general management experience so early in his career.”

One caution as you approach this assignment.  Please do not fall into the trap of blaming others for Erik Peterson’s failure.  This is a course in managing people and organizations and in each module we study how to become a better manager and leader.  Unexpected things do happen – key people leave, problems arise, personality conflicts surface, competition changes, etc.  It’s true that that personnel issues and problems throughout the company resulted in Erik Peterson not having the mentoring he expected. However, there was so much more that Erik Peterson could have done. He could have at least picked up the phone and asked Richard Jenkins for help.  

12.2 Who Is a Leader? Trait Approaches to Leadership

12.3 What Do Leaders Do? Behavioral Approaches to Leadership

12.4 What Is the Role of the Context? Contingency Approaches to Leadership

12.5 What’s New? Contemporary Approaches to Leadership

Knowing what actually happened before submitting your written case study analysis makes this assignment a bit different that the rest of the case studies assigned in this course.  Instead of explaining what the protagonist should do, in this assignment you will need to explain what Erik Peterson should have done to apply the leadership principles we studied to have achieved a successful outcome.

Thoughtfully consider what Richard Jenkins expected Erik Peterson to do when he promoted him to acting general manager (GM) with overall authority for Biometra’s operations.   The “vice president who would have overseen the catheter product launched had left abruptly to join a startup device company.”  “A number of key Biometra managers had departed as well.”  Even though there were “many other SciMat product launches in progress,” this was an urgent, “high profile” product launch for Biometra.  For Erik Peterson, this was an opportunity of a lifetime and he was “both excited and daunted by this opportunity to have general management experience so early in his career.”

One caution as you approach this assignment.  Please do not fall into the trap of blaming others for Erik Peterson’s failure.  This is a course in managing people and organizations and in each module we study how to become a better manager and leader.  Unexpected things do happen – key people leave, problems arise, personality conflicts surface, competition changes, etc.  It’s true that that personnel issues and problems throughout the company resulted in Erik Peterson not having the mentoring he expected. However, there was so much more that Erik Peterson could have done. He could have at least picked up the phone and asked Richard Jenkins for help.  

12.2 Who Is a Leader? Trait Approaches to Leadership

12.3 What Do Leaders Do? Behavioral Approaches to Leadership

12.4 What Is the Role of the Context? Contingency Approaches to Leadership

12.5 What’s New? Contemporary Approaches to Leadership

Knowing what actually happened before submitting your written case study analysis makes this assignment a bit different that the rest of the case studies assigned in this course.  Instead of explaining what the protagonist should do, in this assignment you will need to explain what Erik Peterson should have done to apply the leadership principles we studied to have achieved a successful outcome.

Thoughtfully consider what Richard Jenkins expected Erik Peterson to do when he promoted him to acting general manager (GM) with overall authority for Biometra’s operations.   The “vice president who would have overseen the catheter product launched had left abruptly to join a startup device company.”  “A number of key Biometra managers had departed as well.”  Even though there were “many other SciMat product launches in progress,” this was an urgent, “high profile” product launch for Biometra.  For Erik Peterson, this was an opportunity of a lifetime and he was “both excited and daunted by this opportunity to have general management experience so early in his career.”

One caution as you approach this assignment.  Please do not fall into the trap of blaming others for Erik Peterson’s failure.  This is a course in managing people and organizations and in each module we study how to become a better manager and leader.  Unexpected things do happen – key people leave, problems arise, personality conflicts surface, competition changes, etc.  It’s true that that personnel issues and problems throughout the company resulted in Erik Peterson not having the mentoring he expected. However, there was so much more that Erik Peterson could have done. He could have at least picked up the phone and asked Richard Jenkins for help.  

12.2 Who Is a Leader? Trait Approaches to Leadership

12.3 What Do Leaders Do? Behavioral Approaches to Leadership

12.4 What Is the Role of the Context? Contingency Approaches to Leadership

12.5 What’s New? Contemporary Approaches to Leadership

Knowing what actually happened before submitting your written case study analysis makes this assignment a bit different that the rest of the case studies assigned in this course.  Instead of explaining what the protagonist should do, in this assignment you will need to explain what Erik Peterson should have done to apply the leadership principles we studied to have achieved a successful outcome.

Thoughtfully consider what Richard Jenkins expected Erik Peterson to do when he promoted him to acting general manager (GM) with overall authority for Biometra’s operations.   The “vice president who would have overseen the catheter product launched had left abruptly to join a startup device company.”  “A number of key Biometra managers had departed as well.”  Even though there were “many other SciMat product launches in progress,” this was an urgent, “high profile” product launch for Biometra.  For Erik Peterson, this was an opportunity of a lifetime and he was “both excited and daunted by this opportunity to have general management experience so early in his career.”

One caution as you approach this assignment.  Please do not fall into the trap of blaming others for Erik Peterson’s failure.  This is a course in managing people and organizations and in each module we study how to become a better manager and leader.  Unexpected things do happen – key people leave, problems arise, personality conflicts surface, competition changes, etc.  It’s true that that personnel issues and problems throughout the company resulted in Erik Peterson not having the mentoring he expected. However, there was so much more that Erik Peterson could have done. He could have at least picked up the phone and asked Richard Jenkins for help.  

12.2 Who Is a Leader? Trait Approaches to Leadership

12.3 What Do Leaders Do? Behavioral Approaches to Leadership

12.4 What Is the Role of the Context? Contingency Approaches to Leadership

12.5 What’s New? Contemporary Approaches to Leadership

Knowing what actually happened before submitting your written case study analysis makes this assignment a bit different that the rest of the case studies assigned in this course.  Instead of explaining what the protagonist should do, in this assignment you will need to explain what Erik Peterson should have done to apply the leadership principles we studied to have achieved a successful outcome.

Thoughtfully consider what Richard Jenkins expected Erik Peterson to do when he promoted him to acting general manager (GM) with overall authority for Biometra’s operations.   The “vice president who would have overseen the catheter product launched had left abruptly to join a startup device company.”  “A number of key Biometra managers had departed as well.”  Even though there were “many other SciMat product launches in progress,” this was an urgent, “high profile” product launch for Biometra.  For Erik Peterson, this was an opportunity of a lifetime and he was “both excited and daunted by this opportunity to have general management experience so early in his career.”

One caution as you approach this assignment.  Please do not fall into the trap of blaming others for Erik Peterson’s failure.  This is a course in managing people and organizations and in each module we study how to become a better manager and leader.  Unexpected things do happen – key people leave, problems arise, personality conflicts surface, competition changes, etc.  It’s true that that personnel issues and problems throughout the company resulted in Erik Peterson not having the mentoring he expected. However, there was so much more that Erik Peterson could have done. He could have at least picked up the phone and asked Richard Jenkins for help.  

12.2 Who Is a Leader? Trait Approaches to Leadership

12.3 What Do Leaders Do? Behavioral Approaches to Leadership

12.4 What Is the Role of the Context? Contingency Approaches to Leadership

12.5 What’s New? Contemporary Approaches to Leadership

Knowing what actually happened before submitting your written case study analysis makes this assignment a bit different that the rest of the case studies assigned in this course.  Instead of explaining what the protagonist should do, in this assignment you will need to explain what Erik Peterson should have done to apply the leadership principles we studied to have achieved a successful outcome.

Thoughtfully consider what Richard Jenkins expected Erik Peterson to do when he promoted him to acting general manager (GM) with overall authority for Biometra’s operations.   The “vice president who would have overseen the catheter product launched had left abruptly to join a startup device company.”  “A number of key Biometra managers had departed as well.”  Even though there were “many other SciMat product launches in progress,” this was an urgent, “high profile” product launch for Biometra.  For Erik Peterson, this was an opportunity of a lifetime and he was “both excited and daunted by this opportunity to have general management experience so early in his career.”

One caution as you approach this assignment.  Please do not fall into the trap of blaming others for Erik Peterson’s failure.  This is a course in managing people and organizations and in each module we study how to become a better manager and leader.  Unexpected things do happen – key people leave, problems arise, personality conflicts surface, competition changes, etc.  It’s true that that personnel issues and problems throughout the company resulted in Erik Peterson not having the mentoring he expected. However, there was so much more that Erik Peterson could have done. He could have at least picked up the phone and asked Richard Jenkins for help.  

12.2 Who Is a Leader? Trait Approaches to Leadership

12.3 What Do Leaders Do? Behavioral Approaches to Leadership

12.4 What Is the Role of the Context? Contingency Approaches to Leadership

12.5 What’s New? Contemporary Approaches to Leadership

Knowing what actually happened before submitting your written case study analysis makes this assignment a bit different that the rest of the case studies assigned in this course.  Instead of explaining what the protagonist should do, in this assignment you will need to explain what Erik Peterson should have done to apply the leadership principles we studied to have achieved a successful outcome.

Thoughtfully consider what Richard Jenkins expected Erik Peterson to do when he promoted him to acting general manager (GM) with overall authority for Biometra’s operations.   The “vice president who would have overseen the catheter product launched had left abruptly to join a startup device company.”  “A number of key Biometra managers had departed as well.”  Even though there were “many other SciMat product launches in progress,” this was an urgent, “high profile” product launch for Biometra.  For Erik Peterson, this was an opportunity of a lifetime and he was “both excited and daunted by this opportunity to have general management experience so early in his career.”

One caution as you approach this assignment.  Please do not fall into the trap of blaming others for Erik Peterson’s failure.  This is a course in managing people and organizations and in each module we study how to become a better manager and leader.  Unexpected things do happen – key people leave, problems arise, personality conflicts surface, competition changes, etc.  It’s true that that personnel issues and problems throughout the company resulted in Erik Peterson not having the mentoring he expected. However, there was so much more that Erik Peterson could have done. He could have at least picked up the phone and asked Richard Jenkins for help.  

12.2 Who Is a Leader? Trait Approaches to Leadership

12.3 What Do Leaders Do? Behavioral Approaches to Leadership

12.4 What Is the Role of the Context? Contingency Approaches to Leadership

12.5 What’s New? Contemporary Approaches to Leadership

Knowing what actually happened before submitting your written case study analysis makes this assignment a bit different that the rest of the case studies assigned in this course.  Instead of explaining what the protagonist should do, in this assignment you will need to explain what Erik Peterson should have done to apply the leadership principles we studied to have achieved a successful outcome.

Thoughtfully consider what Richard Jenkins expected Erik Peterson to do when he promoted him to acting general manager (GM) with overall authority for Biometra’s operations.   The “vice president who would have overseen the catheter product launched had left abruptly to join a startup device company.”  “A number of key Biometra managers had departed as well.”  Even though there were “many other SciMat product launches in progress,” this was an urgent, “high profile” product launch for Biometra.  For Erik Peterson, this was an opportunity of a lifetime and he was “both excited and daunted by this opportunity to have general management experience so early in his career.”

One caution as you approach this assignment.  Please do not fall into the trap of blaming others for Erik Peterson’s failure.  This is a course in managing people and organizations and in each module we study how to become a better manager and leader.  Unexpected things do happen – key people leave, problems arise, personality conflicts surface, competition changes, etc.  It’s true that that personnel issues and problems throughout the company resulted in Erik Peterson not having the mentoring he expected. However, there was so much more that Erik Peterson could have done. He could have at least picked up the phone and asked Richard Jenkins for help.  

12.2 Who Is a Leader? Trait Approaches to Leadership

12.3 What Do Leaders Do? Behavioral Approaches to Leadership

12.4 What Is the Role of the Context? Contingency Approaches to Leadership

12.5 What’s New? Contemporary Approaches to Leadership

Knowing what actually happened before submitting your written case study analysis makes this assignment a bit different that the rest of the case studies assigned in this course.  Instead of explaining what the protagonist should do, in this assignment you will need to explain what Erik Peterson should have done to apply the leadership principles we studied to have achieved a successful outcome.

Thoughtfully consider what Richard Jenkins expected Erik Peterson to do when he promoted him to acting general manager (GM) with overall authority for Biometra’s operations.   The “vice president who would have overseen the catheter product launched had left abruptly to join a startup device company.”  “A number of key Biometra managers had departed as well.”  Even though there were “many other SciMat product launches in progress,” this was an urgent, “high profile” product launch for Biometra.  For Erik Peterson, this was an opportunity of a lifetime and he was “both excited and daunted by this opportunity to have general management experience so early in his career.”

One caution as you approach this assignment.  Please do not fall into the trap of blaming others for Erik Peterson’s failure.  This is a course in managing people and organizations and in each module we study how to become a better manager and leader.  Unexpected things do happen – key people leave, problems arise, personality conflicts surface, competition changes, etc.  It’s true that that personnel issues and problems throughout the company resulted in Erik Peterson not having the mentoring he expected. However, there was so much more that Erik Peterson could have done. He could have at least picked up the phone and asked Richard Jenkins for help.  

12.2 Who Is a Leader? Trait Approaches to Leadership

12.3 What Do Leaders Do? Behavioral Approaches to Leadership

12.4 What Is the Role of the Context? Contingency Approaches to Leadership

12.5 What’s New? Contemporary Approaches to Leadership

Knowing what actually happened before submitting your written case study analysis makes this assignment a bit different that the rest of the case studies assigned in this course.  Instead of explaining what the protagonist should do, in this assignment you will need to explain what Erik Peterson should have done to apply the leadership principles we studied to have achieved a successful outcome.

Thoughtfully consider what Richard Jenkins expected Erik Peterson to do when he promoted him to acting general manager (GM) with overall authority for Biometra’s operations.   The “vice president who would have overseen the catheter product launched had left abruptly to join a startup device company.”  “A number of key Biometra managers had departed as well.”  Even though there were “many other SciMat product launches in progress,” this was an urgent, “high profile” product launch for Biometra.  For Erik Peterson, this was an opportunity of a lifetime and he was “both excited and daunted by this opportunity to have general management experience so early in his career.”

One caution as you approach this assignment.  Please do not fall into the trap of blaming others for Erik Peterson’s failure.  This is a course in managing people and organizations and in each module we study how to become a better manager and leader.  Unexpected things do happen – key people leave, problems arise, personality conflicts surface, competition changes, etc.  It’s true that that personnel issues and problems throughout the company resulted in Erik Peterson not having the mentoring he expected. However, there was so much more that Erik Peterson could have done. He could have at least picked up the phone and asked Richard Jenkins for help.  

12.2 Who Is a Leader? Trait Approaches to Leadership

12.3 What Do Leaders Do? Behavioral Approaches to Leadership

12.4 What Is the Role of the Context? Contingency Approaches to Leadership

12.5 What’s New? Contemporary Approaches to Leadership

Knowing what actually happened before submitting your written case study analysis makes this assignment a bit different that the rest of the case studies assigned in this course.  Instead of explaining what the protagonist should do, in this assignment you will need to explain what Erik Peterson should have done to apply the leadership principles we studied to have achieved a successful outcome.

Thoughtfully consider what Richard Jenkins expected Erik Peterson to do when he promoted him to acting general manager (GM) with overall authority for Biometra’s operations.   The “vice president who would have overseen the catheter product launched had left abruptly to join a startup device company.”  “A number of key Biometra managers had departed as well.”  Even though there were “many other SciMat product launches in progress,” this was an urgent, “high profile” product launch for Biometra.  For Erik Peterson, this was an opportunity of a lifetime and he was “both excited and daunted by this opportunity to have general management experience so early in his career.”

One caution as you approach this assignment.  Please do not fall into the trap of blaming others for Erik Peterson’s failure.  This is a course in managing people and organizations and in each module we study how to become a better manager and leader.  Unexpected things do happen – key people leave, problems arise, personality conflicts surface, competition changes, etc.  It’s true that that personnel issues and problems throughout the company resulted in Erik Peterson not having the mentoring he expected. However, there was so much more that Erik Peterson could have done. He could have at least picked up the phone and asked Richard Jenkins for help.  

12.2 Who Is a Leader? Trait Approaches to Leadership

12.3 What Do Leaders Do? Behavioral Approaches to Leadership

12.4 What Is the Role of the Context? Contingency Approaches to Leadership

12.5 What’s New? Contemporary Approaches to Leadership

Knowing what actually happened before submitting your written case study analysis makes this assignment a bit different that the rest of the case studies assigned in this course.  Instead of explaining what the protagonist should do, in this assignment you will need to explain what Erik Peterson should have done to apply the leadership principles we studied to have achieved a successful outcome.

Thoughtfully consider what Richard Jenkins expected Erik Peterson to do when he promoted him to acting general manager (GM) with overall authority for Biometra’s operations.   The “vice president who would have overseen the catheter product launched had left abruptly to join a startup device company.”  “A number of key Biometra managers had departed as well.”  Even though there were “many other SciMat product launches in progress,” this was an urgent, “high profile” product launch for Biometra.  For Erik Peterson, this was an opportunity of a lifetime and he was “both excited and daunted by this opportunity to have general management experience so early in his career.”

One caution as you approach this assignment.  Please do not fall into the trap of blaming others for Erik Peterson’s failure.  This is a course in managing people and organizations and in each module we study how to become a better manager and leader.  Unexpected things do happen – key people leave, problems arise, personality conflicts surface, competition changes, etc.  It’s true that that personnel issues and problems throughout the company resulted in Erik Peterson not having the mentoring he expected. However, there was so much more that Erik Peterson could have done. He could have at least picked up the phone and asked Richard Jenkins for help.  

12.2 Who Is a Leader? Trait Approaches to Leadership

12.3 What Do Leaders Do? Behavioral Approaches to Leadership

12.4 What Is the Role of the Context? Contingency Approaches to Leadership

12.5 What’s New? Contemporary Approaches to Leadership

Knowing what actually happened before submitting your written case study analysis makes this assignment a bit different that the rest of the case studies assigned in this course.  Instead of explaining what the protagonist should do, in this assignment you will need to explain what Erik Peterson should have done to apply the leadership principles we studied to have achieved a successful outcome.

Thoughtfully consider what Richard Jenkins expected Erik Peterson to do when he promoted him to acting general manager (GM) with overall authority for Biometra’s operations.   The “vice president who would have overseen the catheter product launched had left abruptly to join a startup device company.”  “A number of key Biometra managers had departed as well.”  Even though there were “many other SciMat product launches in progress,” this was an urgent, “high profile” product launch for Biometra.  For Erik Peterson, this was an opportunity of a lifetime and he was “both excited and daunted by this opportunity to have general management experience so early in his career.”

One caution as you approach this assignment.  Please do not fall into the trap of blaming others for Erik Peterson’s failure.  This is a course in managing people and organizations and in each module we study how to become a better manager and leader.  Unexpected things do happen – key people leave, problems arise, personality conflicts surface, competition changes, etc.  It’s true that that personnel issues and problems throughout the company resulted in Erik Peterson not having the mentoring he expected. However, there was so much more that Erik Peterson could have done. He could have at least picked up the phone and asked Richard Jenkins for help.  

12.2 Who Is a Leader? Trait Approaches to Leadership

12.3 What Do Leaders Do? Behavioral Approaches to Leadership

12.4 What Is the Role of the Context? Contingency Approaches to Leadership

12.5 What’s New? Contemporary Approaches to Leadership

Knowing what actually happened before submitting your written case study analysis makes this assignment a bit different that the rest of the case studies assigned in this course.  Instead of explaining what the protagonist should do, in this assignment you will need to explain what Erik Peterson should have done to apply the leadership principles we studied to have achieved a successful outcome.

Thoughtfully consider what Richard Jenkins expected Erik Peterson to do when he promoted him to acting general manager (GM) with overall authority for Biometra’s operations.   The “vice president who would have overseen the catheter product launched had left abruptly to join a startup device company.”  “A number of key Biometra managers had departed as well.”  Even though there were “many other SciMat product launches in progress,” this was an urgent, “high profile” product launch for Biometra.  For Erik Peterson, this was an opportunity of a lifetime and he was “both excited and daunted by this opportunity to have general management experience so early in his career.”

One caution as you approach this assignment.  Please do not fall into the trap of blaming others for Erik Peterson’s failure.  This is a course in managing people and organizations and in each module we study how to become a better manager and leader.  Unexpected things do happen – key people leave, problems arise, personality conflicts surface, competition changes, etc.  It’s true that that personnel issues and problems throughout the company resulted in Erik Peterson not having the mentoring he expected. However, there was so much more that Erik Peterson could have done. He could have at least picked up the phone and asked Richard Jenkins for help.  

12.2 Who Is a Leader? Trait Approaches to Leadership

12.3 What Do Leaders Do? Behavioral Approaches to Leadership

12.4 What Is the Role of the Context? Contingency Approaches to Leadership

12.5 What’s New? Contemporary Approaches to Leadership

Knowing what actually happened before submitting your written case study analysis makes this assignment a bit different that the rest of the case studies assigned in this course.  Instead of explaining what the protagonist should do, in this assignment you will need to explain what Erik Peterson should have done to apply the leadership principles we studied to have achieved a successful outcome.

Thoughtfully consider what Richard Jenkins expected Erik Peterson to do when he promoted him to acting general manager (GM) with overall authority for Biometra’s operations.   The “vice president who would have overseen the catheter product launched had left abruptly to join a startup device company.”  “A number of key Biometra managers had departed as well.”  Even though there were “many other SciMat product launches in progress,” this was an urgent, “high profile” product launch for Biometra.  For Erik Peterson, this was an opportunity of a lifetime and he was “both excited and daunted by this opportunity to have general management experience so early in his career.”

One caution as you approach this assignment.  Please do not fall into the trap of blaming others for Erik Peterson’s failure.  This is a course in managing people and organizations and in each module we study how to become a better manager and leader.  Unexpected things do happen – key people leave, problems arise, personality conflicts surface, competition changes, etc.  It’s true that that personnel issues and problems throughout the company resulted in Erik Peterson not having the mentoring he expected. However, there was so much more that Erik Peterson could have done. He could have at least picked up the phone and asked Richard Jenkins for help.  

12.2 Who Is a Leader? Trait Approaches to Leadership

12.3 What Do Leaders Do? Behavioral Approaches to Leadership

12.4 What Is the Role of the Context? Contingency Approaches to Leadership

12.5 What’s New? Contemporary Approaches to Leadership

Knowing what actually happened before submitting your written case study analysis makes this assignment a bit different that the rest of the case studies assigned in this course.  Instead of explaining what the protagonist should do, in this assignment you will need to explain what Erik Peterson should have done to apply the leadership principles we studied to have achieved a successful outcome.

Thoughtfully consider what Richard Jenkins expected Erik Peterson to do when he promoted him to acting general manager (GM) with overall authority for Biometra’s operations.   The “vice president who would have overseen the catheter product launched had left abruptly to join a startup device company.”  “A number of key Biometra managers had departed as well.”  Even though there were “many other SciMat product launches in progress,” this was an urgent, “high profile” product launch for Biometra.  For Erik Peterson, this was an opportunity of a lifetime and he was “both excited and daunted by this opportunity to have general management experience so early in his career.”

One caution as you approach this assignment.  Please do not fall into the trap of blaming others for Erik Peterson’s failure.  This is a course in managing people and organizations and in each module we study how to become a better manager and leader.  Unexpected things do happen – key people leave, problems arise, personality conflicts surface, competition changes, etc.  It’s true that that personnel issues and problems throughout the company resulted in Erik Peterson not having the mentoring he expected. However, there was so much more that Erik Peterson could have done. He could have at least picked up the phone and asked Richard Jenkins for help.  

12.2 Who Is a Leader? Trait Approaches to Leadership

12.3 What Do Leaders Do? Behavioral Approaches to Leadership

12.4 What Is the Role of the Context? Contingency Approaches to Leadership

12.5 What’s New? Contemporary Approaches to Leadership

Knowing what actually happened before submitting your written case study analysis makes this assignment a bit different that the rest of the case studies assigned in this course.  Instead of explaining what the protagonist should do, in this assignment you will need to explain what Erik Peterson should have done to apply the leadership principles we studied to have achieved a successful outcome.

Thoughtfully consider what Richard Jenkins expected Erik Peterson to do when he promoted him to acting general manager (GM) with overall authority for Biometra’s operations.   The “vice president who would have overseen the catheter product launched had left abruptly to join a startup device company.”  “A number of key Biometra managers had departed as well.”  Even though there were “many other SciMat product launches in progress,” this was an urgent, “high profile” product launch for Biometra.  For Erik Peterson, this was an opportunity of a lifetime and he was “both excited and daunted by this opportunity to have general management experience so early in his career.”

One caution as you approach this assignment.  Please do not fall into the trap of blaming others for Erik Peterson’s failure.  This is a course in managing people and organizations and in each module we study how to become a better manager and leader.  Unexpected things do happen – key people leave, problems arise, personality conflicts surface, competition changes, etc.  It’s true that that personnel issues and problems throughout the company resulted in Erik Peterson not having the mentoring he expected. However, there was so much more that Erik Peterson could have done. He could have at least picked up the phone and asked Richard Jenkins for help.  

12.2 Who Is a Leader? Trait Approaches to Leadership

12.3 What Do Leaders Do? Behavioral Approaches to Leadership

12.4 What Is the Role of the Context? Contingency Approaches to Leadership

12.5 What’s New? Contemporary Approaches to Leadership

Knowing what actually happened before submitting your written case study analysis makes this assignment a bit different that the rest of the case studies assigned in this course.  Instead of explaining what the protagonist should do, in this assignment you will need to explain what Erik Peterson should have done to apply the leadership principles we studied to have achieved a successful outcome.

Thoughtfully consider what Richard Jenkins expected Erik Peterson to do when he promoted him to acting general manager (GM) with overall authority for Biometra’s operations.   The “vice president who would have overseen the catheter product launched had left abruptly to join a startup device company.”  “A number of key Biometra managers had departed as well.”  Even though there were “many other SciMat product launches in progress,” this was an urgent, “high profile” product launch for Biometra.  For Erik Peterson, this was an opportunity of a lifetime and he was “both excited and daunted by this opportunity to have general management experience so early in his career.”

One caution as you approach this assignment.  Please do not fall into the trap of blaming others for Erik Peterson’s failure.  This is a course in managing people and organizations and in each module we study how to become a better manager and leader.  Unexpected things do happen – key people leave, problems arise, personality conflicts surface, competition changes, etc.  It’s true that that personnel issues and problems throughout the company resulted in Erik Peterson not having the mentoring he expected. However, there was so much more that Erik Peterson could have done. He could have at least picked up the phone and asked Richard Jenkins for help.  

12.2 Who Is a Leader? Trait Approaches to Leadership

12.3 What Do Leaders Do? Behavioral Approaches to Leadership

12.4 What Is the Role of the Context? Contingency Approaches to Leadership

12.5 What’s New? Contemporary Approaches to Leadership

Knowing what actually happened before submitting your written case study analysis makes this assignment a bit different that the rest of the case studies assigned in this course.  Instead of explaining what the protagonist should do, in this assignment you will need to explain what Erik Peterson should have done to apply the leadership principles we studied to have achieved a successful outcome.

Thoughtfully consider what Richard Jenkins expected Erik Peterson to do when he promoted him to acting general manager (GM) with overall authority for Biometra’s operations.   The “vice president who would have overseen the catheter product launched had left abruptly to join a startup device company.”  “A number of key Biometra managers had departed as well.”  Even though there were “many other SciMat product launches in progress,” this was an urgent, “high profile” product launch for Biometra.  For Erik Peterson, this was an opportunity of a lifetime and he was “both excited and daunted by this opportunity to have general management experience so early in his career.”

One caution as you approach this assignment.  Please do not fall into the trap of blaming others for Erik Peterson’s failure.  This is a course in managing people and organizations and in each module we study how to become a better manager and leader.  Unexpected things do happen – key people leave, problems arise, personality conflicts surface, competition changes, etc.  It’s true that that personnel issues and problems throughout the company resulted in Erik Peterson not having the mentoring he expected. However, there was so much more that Erik Peterson could have done. He could have at least picked up the phone and asked Richard Jenkins for help.  

12.2 Who Is a Leader? Trait Approaches to Leadership

12.3 What Do Leaders Do? Behavioral Approaches to Leadership

12.4 What Is the Role of the Context? Contingency Approaches to Leadership

12.5 What’s New? Contemporary Approaches to Leadership

Knowing what actually happened before submitting your written case study analysis makes this assignment a bit different that the rest of the case studies assigned in this course.  Instead of explaining what the protagonist should do, in this assignment you will need to explain what Erik Peterson should have done to apply the leadership principles we studied to have achieved a successful outcome.

Thoughtfully consider what Richard Jenkins expected Erik Peterson to do when he promoted him to acting general manager (GM) with overall authority for Biometra’s operations.   The “vice president who would have overseen the catheter product launched had left abruptly to join a startup device company.”  “A number of key Biometra managers had departed as well.”  Even though there were “many other SciMat product launches in progress,” this was an urgent, “high profile” product launch for Biometra.  For Erik Peterson, this was an opportunity of a lifetime and he was “both excited and daunted by this opportunity to have general management experience so early in his career.”

One caution as you approach this assignment.  Please do not fall into the trap of blaming others for Erik Peterson’s failure.  This is a course in managing people and organizations and in each module we study how to become a better manager and leader.  Unexpected things do happen – key people leave, problems arise, personality conflicts surface, competition changes, etc.  It’s true that that personnel issues and problems throughout the company resulted in Erik Peterson not having the mentoring he expected. However, there was so much more that Erik Peterson could have done. He could have at least picked up the phone and asked Richard Jenkins for help.  

12.2 Who Is a Leader? Trait Approaches to Leadership

12.3 What Do Leaders Do? Behavioral Approaches to Leadership

12.4 What Is the Role of the Context? Contingency Approaches to Leadership

12.5 What’s New? Contemporary Approaches to Leadership

Knowing what actually happened before submitting your written case study analysis makes this assignment a bit different that the rest of the case studies assigned in this course.  Instead of explaining what the protagonist should do, in this assignment you will need to explain what Erik Peterson should have done to apply the leadership principles we studied to have achieved a successful outcome.

Thoughtfully consider what Richard Jenkins expected Erik Peterson to do when he promoted him to acting general manager (GM) with overall authority for Biometra’s operations.   The “vice president who would have overseen the catheter product launched had left abruptly to join a startup device company.”  “A number of key Biometra managers had departed as well.”  Even though there were “many other SciMat product launches in progress,” this was an urgent, “high profile” product launch for Biometra.  For Erik Peterson, this was an opportunity of a lifetime and he was “both excited and daunted by this opportunity to have general management experience so early in his career.”

One caution as you approach this assignment.  Please do not fall into the trap of blaming others for Erik Peterson’s failure.  This is a course in managing people and organizations and in each module we study how to become a better manager and leader.  Unexpected things do happen – key people leave, problems arise, personality conflicts surface, competition changes, etc.  It’s true that that personnel issues and problems throughout the company resulted in Erik Peterson not having the mentoring he expected. However, there was so much more that Erik Peterson could have done. He could have at least picked up the phone and asked Richard Jenkins for help.  

12.2 Who Is a Leader? Trait Approaches to Leadership

12.3 What Do Leaders Do? Behavioral Approaches to Leadership

12.4 What Is the Role of the Context? Contingency Approaches to Leadership

12.5 What’s New? Contemporary Approaches to Leadership

Knowing what actually happened before submitting your written case study analysis makes this assignment a bit different that the rest of the case studies assigned in this course.  Instead of explaining what the protagonist should do, in this assignment you will need to explain what Erik Peterson should have done to apply the leadership principles we studied to have achieved a successful outcome.

Thoughtfully consider what Richard Jenkins expected Erik Peterson to do when he promoted him to acting general manager (GM) with overall authority for Biometra’s operations.   The “vice president who would have overseen the catheter product launched had left abruptly to join a startup device company.”  “A number of key Biometra managers had departed as well.”  Even though there were “many other SciMat product launches in progress,” this was an urgent, “high profile” product launch for Biometra.  For Erik Peterson, this was an opportunity of a lifetime and he was “both excited and daunted by this opportunity to have general management experience so early in his career.”

One caution as you approach this assignment.  Please do not fall into the trap of blaming others for Erik Peterson’s failure.  This is a course in managing people and organizations and in each module we study how to become a better manager and leader.  Unexpected things do happen – key people leave, problems arise, personality conflicts surface, competition changes, etc.  It’s true that that personnel issues and problems throughout the company resulted in Erik Peterson not having the mentoring he expected. However, there was so much more that Erik Peterson could have done. He could have at least picked up the phone and asked Richard Jenkins for help.  

12.2 Who Is a Leader? Trait Approaches to Leadership

12.3 What Do Leaders Do? Behavioral Approaches to Leadership

12.4 What Is the Role of the Context? Contingency Approaches to Leadership

12.5 What’s New? Contemporary Approaches to Leadership

Knowing what actually happened before submitting your written case study analysis makes this assignment a bit different that the rest of the case studies assigned in this course.  Instead of explaining what the protagonist should do, in this assignment you will need to explain what Erik Peterson should have done to apply the leadership principles we studied to have achieved a successful outcome.

Thoughtfully consider what Richard Jenkins expected Erik Peterson to do when he promoted him to acting general manager (GM) with overall authority for Biometra’s operations.   The “vice president who would have overseen the catheter product launched had left abruptly to join a startup device company.”  “A number of key Biometra managers had departed as well.”  Even though there were “many other SciMat product launches in progress,” this was an urgent, “high profile” product launch for Biometra.  For Erik Peterson, this was an opportunity of a lifetime and he was “both excited and daunted by this opportunity to have general management experience so early in his career.”

One caution as you approach this assignment.  Please do not fall into the trap of blaming others for Erik Peterson’s failure.  This is a course in managing people and organizations and in each module we study how to become a better manager and leader.  Unexpected things do happen – key people leave, problems arise, personality conflicts surface, competition changes, etc.  It’s true that that personnel issues and problems throughout the company resulted in Erik Peterson not having the mentoring he expected. However, there was so much more that Erik Peterson could have done. He could have at least picked up the phone and asked Richard Jenkins for help.  

12.2 Who Is a Leader? Trait Approaches to Leadership

12.3 What Do Leaders Do? Behavioral Approaches to Leadership

12.4 What Is the Role of the Context? Contingency Approaches to Leadership

12.5 What’s New? Contemporary Approaches to Leadership

Knowing what actually happened before submitting your written case study analysis makes this assignment a bit different that the rest of the case studies assigned in this course.  Instead of explaining what the protagonist should do, in this assignment you will need to explain what Erik Peterson should have done to apply the leadership principles we studied to have achieved a successful outcome.

Thoughtfully consider what Richard Jenkins expected Erik Peterson to do when he promoted him to acting general manager (GM) with overall authority for Biometra’s operations.   The “vice president who would have overseen the catheter product launched had left abruptly to join a startup device company.”  “A number of key Biometra managers had departed as well.”  Even though there were “many other SciMat product launches in progress,” this was an urgent, “high profile” product launch for Biometra.  For Erik Peterson, this was an opportunity of a lifetime and he was “both excited and daunted by this opportunity to have general management experience so early in his career.”

One caution as you approach this assignment.  Please do not fall into the trap of blaming others for Erik Peterson’s failure.  This is a course in managing people and organizations and in each module we study how to become a better manager and leader.  Unexpected things do happen – key people leave, problems arise, personality conflicts surface, competition changes, etc.  It’s true that that personnel issues and problems throughout the company resulted in Erik Peterson not having the mentoring he expected. However, there was so much more that Erik Peterson could have done. He could have at least picked up the phone and asked Richard Jenkins for help.  

12.2 Who Is a Leader? Trait Approaches to Leadership

12.3 What Do Leaders Do? Behavioral Approaches to Leadership

12.4 What Is the Role of the Context? Contingency Approaches to Leadership

12.5 What’s New? Contemporary Approaches to Leadership

Knowing what actually happened before submitting your written case study analysis makes this assignment a bit different that the rest of the case studies assigned in this course.  Instead of explaining what the protagonist should do, in this assignment you will need to explain what Erik Peterson should have done to apply the leadership principles we studied to have achieved a successful outcome.

Thoughtfully consider what Richard Jenkins expected Erik Peterson to do when he promoted him to acting general manager (GM) with overall authority for Biometra’s operations.   The “vice president who would have overseen the catheter product launched had left abruptly to join a startup device company.”  “A number of key Biometra managers had departed as well.”  Even though there were “many other SciMat product launches in progress,” this was an urgent, “high profile” product launch for Biometra.  For Erik Peterson, this was an opportunity of a lifetime and he was “both excited and daunted by this opportunity to have general management experience so early in his career.”

One caution as you approach this assignment.  Please do not fall into the trap of blaming others for Erik Peterson’s failure.  This is a course in managing people and organizations and in each module we study how to become a better manager and leader.  Unexpected things do happen – key people leave, problems arise, personality conflicts surface, competition changes, etc.  It’s true that that personnel issues and problems throughout the company resulted in Erik Peterson not having the mentoring he expected. However, there was so much more that Erik Peterson could have done. He could have at least picked up the phone and asked Richard Jenkins for help.  

12.2 Who Is a Leader? Trait Approaches to Leadership

12.3 What Do Leaders Do? Behavioral Approaches to Leadership

12.4 What Is the Role of the Context? Contingency Approaches to Leadership

12.5 What’s New? Contemporary Approaches to Leadership

Knowing what actually happened before submitting your written case study analysis makes this assignment a bit different that the rest of the case studies assigned in this course.  Instead of explaining what the protagonist should do, in this assignment you will need to explain what Erik Peterson should have done to apply the leadership principles we studied to have achieved a successful outcome.

Thoughtfully consider what Richard Jenkins expected Erik Peterson to do when he promoted him to acting general manager (GM) with overall authority for Biometra’s operations.   The “vice president who would have overseen the catheter product launched had left abruptly to join a startup device company.”  “A number of key Biometra managers had departed as well.”  Even though there were “many other SciMat product launches in progress,” this was an urgent, “high profile” product launch for Biometra.  For Erik Peterson, this was an opportunity of a lifetime and he was “both excited and daunted by this opportunity to have general management experience so early in his career.”

One caution as you approach this assignment.  Please do not fall into the trap of blaming others for Erik Peterson’s failure.  This is a course in managing people and organizations and in each module we study how to become a better manager and leader.  Unexpected things do happen – key people leave, problems arise, personality conflicts surface, competition changes, etc.  It’s true that that personnel issues and problems throughout the company resulted in Erik Peterson not having the mentoring he expected. However, there was so much more that Erik Peterson could have done. He could have at least picked up the phone and asked Richard Jenkins for help.  

12.2 Who Is a Leader? Trait Approaches to Leadership

12.3 What Do Leaders Do? Behavioral Approaches to Leadership

12.4 What Is the Role of the Context? Contingency Approaches to Leadership

12.5 What’s New? Contemporary Approaches to Leadership

Knowing what actually happened before submitting your written case study analysis makes this assignment a bit different that the rest of the case studies assigned in this course.  Instead of explaining what the protagonist should do, in this assignment you will need to explain what Erik Peterson should have done to apply the leadership principles we studied to have achieved a successful outcome.

Thoughtfully consider what Richard Jenkins expected Erik Peterson to do when he promoted him to acting general manager (GM) with overall authority for Biometra’s operations.   The “vice president who would have overseen the catheter product launched had left abruptly to join a startup device company.”  “A number of key Biometra managers had departed as well.”  Even though there were “many other SciMat product launches in progress,” this was an urgent, “high profile” product launch for Biometra.  For Erik Peterson, this was an opportunity of a lifetime and he was “both excited and daunted by this opportunity to have general management experience so early in his career.”

One caution as you approach this assignment.  Please do not fall into the trap of blaming others for Erik Peterson’s failure.  This is a course in managing people and organizations and in each module we study how to become a better manager and leader.  Unexpected things do happen – key people leave, problems arise, personality conflicts surface, competition changes, etc.  It’s true that that personnel issues and problems throughout the company resulted in Erik Peterson not having the mentoring he expected. However, there was so much more that Erik Peterson could have done. He could have at least picked up the phone and asked Richard Jenkins for help.  

12.2 Who Is a Leader? Trait Approaches to Leadership

12.3 What Do Leaders Do? Behavioral Approaches to Leadership

12.4 What Is the Role of the Context? Contingency Approaches to Leadership

12.5 What’s New? Contemporary Approaches to Leadership

Knowing what actually happened before submitting your written case study analysis makes this assignment a bit different that the rest of the case studies assigned in this course.  Instead of explaining what the protagonist should do, in this assignment you will need to explain what Erik Peterson should have done to apply the leadership principles we studied to have achieved a successful outcome.

Thoughtfully consider what Richard Jenkins expected Erik Peterson to do when he promoted him to acting general manager (GM) with overall authority for Biometra’s operations.   The “vice president who would have overseen the catheter product launched had left abruptly to join a startup device company.”  “A number of key Biometra managers had departed as well.”  Even though there were “many other SciMat product launches in progress,” this was an urgent, “high profile” product launch for Biometra.  For Erik Peterson, this was an opportunity of a lifetime and he was “both excited and daunted by this opportunity to have general management experience so early in his career.”

One caution as you approach this assignment.  Please do not fall into the trap of blaming others for Erik Peterson’s failure.  This is a course in managing people and organizations and in each module we study how to become a better manager and leader.  Unexpected things do happen – key people leave, problems arise, personality conflicts surface, competition changes, etc.  It’s true that that personnel issues and problems throughout the company resulted in Erik Peterson not having the mentoring he expected. However, there was so much more that Erik Peterson could have done. He could have at least picked up the phone and asked Richard Jenkins for help.  

12.2 Who Is a Leader? Trait Approaches to Leadership

12.3 What Do Leaders Do? Behavioral Approaches to Leadership

12.4 What Is the Role of the Context? Contingency Approaches to Leadership

12.5 What’s New? Contemporary Approaches to Leadership

Knowing what actually happened before submitting your written case study analysis makes this assignment a bit different that the rest of the case studies assigned in this course.  Instead of explaining what the protagonist should do, in this assignment you will need to explain what Erik Peterson should have done to apply the leadership principles we studied to have achieved a successful outcome.

Thoughtfully consider what Richard Jenkins expected Erik Peterson to do when he promoted him to acting general manager (GM) with overall authority for Biometra’s operations.   The “vice president who would have overseen the catheter product launched had left abruptly to join a startup device company.”  “A number of key Biometra managers had departed as well.”  Even though there were “many other SciMat product launches in progress,” this was an urgent, “high profile” product launch for Biometra.  For Erik Peterson, this was an opportunity of a lifetime and he was “both excited and daunted by this opportunity to have general management experience so early in his career.”

One caution as you approach this assignment.  Please do not fall into the trap of blaming others for Erik Peterson’s failure.  This is a course in managing people and organizations and in each module we study how to become a better manager and leader.  Unexpected things do happen – key people leave, problems arise, personality conflicts surface, competition changes, etc.  It’s true that that personnel issues and problems throughout the company resulted in Erik Peterson not having the mentoring he expected. However, there was so much more that Erik Peterson could have done. He could have at least picked up the phone and asked Richard Jenkins for help.  

12.2 Who Is a Leader? Trait Approaches to Leadership

12.3 What Do Leaders Do? Behavioral Approaches to Leadership

12.4 What Is the Role of the Context? Contingency Approaches to Leadership

12.5 What’s New? Contemporary Approaches to Leadership

Knowing what actually happened before submitting your written case study analysis makes this assignment a bit different that the rest of the case studies assigned in this course.  Instead of explaining what the protagonist should do, in this assignment you will need to explain what Erik Peterson should have done to apply the leadership principles we studied to have achieved a successful outcome.

Thoughtfully consider what Richard Jenkins expected Erik Peterson to do when he promoted him to acting general manager (GM) with overall authority for Biometra’s operations.   The “vice president who would have overseen the catheter product launched had left abruptly to join a startup device company.”  “A number of key Biometra managers had departed as well.”  Even though there were “many other SciMat product launches in progress,” this was an urgent, “high profile” product launch for Biometra.  For Erik Peterson, this was an opportunity of a lifetime and he was “both excited and daunted by this opportunity to have general management experience so early in his career.”

One caution as you approach this assignment.  Please do not fall into the trap of blaming others for Erik Peterson’s failure.  This is a course in managing people and organizations and in each module we study how to become a better manager and leader.  Unexpected things do happen – key people leave, problems arise, personality conflicts surface, competition changes, etc.  It’s true that that personnel issues and problems throughout the company resulted in Erik Peterson not having the mentoring he expected. However, there was so much more that Erik Peterson could have done. He could have at least picked up the phone and asked Richard Jenkins for help.  

12.2 Who Is a Leader? Trait Approaches to Leadership

12.3 What Do Leaders Do? Behavioral Approaches to Leadership

12.4 What Is the Role of the Context? Contingency Approaches to Leadership

12.5 What’s New? Contemporary Approaches to Leadership

Knowing what actually happened before submitting your written case study analysis makes this assignment a bit different that the rest of the case studies assigned in this course.  Instead of explaining what the protagonist should do, in this assignment you will need to explain what Erik Peterson should have done to apply the leadership principles we studied to have achieved a successful outcome.

Thoughtfully consider what Richard Jenkins expected Erik Peterson to do when he promoted him to acting general manager (GM) with overall authority for Biometra’s operations.   The “vice president who would have overseen the catheter product launched had left abruptly to join a startup device company.”  “A number of key Biometra managers had departed as well.”  Even though there were “many other SciMat product launches in progress,” this was an urgent, “high profile” product launch for Biometra.  For Erik Peterson, this was an opportunity of a lifetime and he was “both excited and daunted by this opportunity to have general management experience so early in his career.”

One caution as you approach this assignment.  Please do not fall into the trap of blaming others for Erik Peterson’s failure.  This is a course in managing people and organizations and in each module we study how to become a better manager and leader.  Unexpected things do happen – key people leave, problems arise, personality conflicts surface, competition changes, etc.  It’s true that that personnel issues and problems throughout the company resulted in Erik Peterson not having the mentoring he expected. However, there was so much more that Erik Peterson could have done. He could have at least picked up the phone and asked Richard Jenkins for help.  

12.2 Who Is a Leader? Trait Approaches to Leadership

12.3 What Do Leaders Do? Behavioral Approaches to Leadership

12.4 What Is the Role of the Context? Contingency Approaches to Leadership

12.5 What’s New? Contemporary Approaches to Leadership

Knowing what actually happened before submitting your written case study analysis makes this assignment a bit different that the rest of the case studies assigned in this course.  Instead of explaining what the protagonist should do, in this assignment you will need to explain what Erik Peterson should have done to apply the leadership principles we studied to have achieved a successful outcome.

Thoughtfully consider what Richard Jenkins expected Erik Peterson to do when he promoted him to acting general manager (GM) with overall authority for Biometra’s operations.   The “vice president who would have overseen the catheter product launched had left abruptly to join a startup device company.”  “A number of key Biometra managers had departed as well.”  Even though there were “many other SciMat product launches in progress,” this was an urgent, “high profile” product launch for Biometra.  For Erik Peterson, this was an opportunity of a lifetime and he was “both excited and daunted by this opportunity to have general management experience so early in his career.”

One caution as you approach this assignment.  Please do not fall into the trap of blaming others for Erik Peterson’s failure.  This is a course in managing people and organizations and in each module we study how to become a better manager and leader.  Unexpected things do happen – key people leave, problems arise, personality conflicts surface, competition changes, etc.  It’s true that that personnel issues and problems throughout the company resulted in Erik Peterson not having the mentoring he expected. However, there was so much more that Erik Peterson could have done. He could have at least picked up the phone and asked Richard Jenkins for help.  

12.2 Who Is a Leader? Trait Approaches to Leadership

12.3 What Do Leaders Do? Behavioral Approaches to Leadership

12.4 What Is the Role of the Context? Contingency Approaches to Leadership

12.5 What’s New? Contemporary Approaches to Leadership

Knowing what actually happened before submitting your written case study analysis makes this assignment a bit different that the rest of the case studies assigned in this course.  Instead of explaining what the protagonist should do, in this assignment you will need to explain what Erik Peterson should have done to apply the leadership principles we studied to have achieved a successful outcome.

Thoughtfully consider what Richard Jenkins expected Erik Peterson to do when he promoted him to acting general manager (GM) with overall authority for Biometra’s operations.   The “vice president who would have overseen the catheter product launched had left abruptly to join a startup device company.”  “A number of key Biometra managers had departed as well.”  Even though there were “many other SciMat product launches in progress,” this was an urgent, “high profile” product launch for Biometra.  For Erik Peterson, this was an opportunity of a lifetime and he was “both excited and daunted by this opportunity to have general management experience so early in his career.”

One caution as you approach this assignment.  Please do not fall into the trap of blaming others for Erik Peterson’s failure.  This is a course in managing people and organizations and in each module we study how to become a better manager and leader.  Unexpected things do happen – key people leave, problems arise, personality conflicts surface, competition changes, etc.  It’s true that that personnel issues and problems throughout the company resulted in Erik Peterson not having the mentoring he expected. However, there was so much more that Erik Peterson could have done. He could have at least picked up the phone and asked Richard Jenkins for help.  

12.2 Who Is a Leader? Trait Approaches to Leadership

12.3 What Do Leaders Do? Behavioral Approaches to Leadership

12.4 What Is the Role of the Context? Contingency Approaches to Leadership

12.5 What’s New? Contemporary Approaches to Leadership

Knowing what actually happened before submitting your written case study analysis makes this assignment a bit different that the rest of the case studies assigned in this course.  Instead of explaining what the protagonist should do, in this assignment you will need to explain what Erik Peterson should have done to apply the leadership principles we studied to have achieved a successful outcome.

Thoughtfully consider what Richard Jenkins expected Erik Peterson to do when he promoted him to acting general manager (GM) with overall authority for Biometra’s operations.   The “vice president who would have overseen the catheter product launched had left abruptly to join a startup device company.”  “A number of key Biometra managers had departed as well.”  Even though there were “many other SciMat product launches in progress,” this was an urgent, “high profile” product launch for Biometra.  For Erik Peterson, this was an opportunity of a lifetime and he was “both excited and daunted by this opportunity to have general management experience so early in his career.”

One caution as you approach this assignment.  Please do not fall into the trap of blaming others for Erik Peterson’s failure.  This is a course in managing people and organizations and in each module we study how to become a better manager and leader.  Unexpected things do happen – key people leave, problems arise, personality conflicts surface, competition changes, etc.  It’s true that that personnel issues and problems throughout the company resulted in Erik Peterson not having the mentoring he expected. However, there was so much more that Erik Peterson could have done. He could have at least picked up the phone and asked Richard Jenkins for help.  

12.2 Who Is a Leader? Trait Approaches to Leadership

12.3 What Do Leaders Do? Behavioral Approaches to Leadership

12.4 What Is the Role of the Context? Contingency Approaches to Leadership

12.5 What’s New? Contemporary Approaches to Leadership

Knowing what actually happened before submitting your written case study analysis makes this assignment a bit different that the rest of the case studies assigned in this course.  Instead of explaining what the protagonist should do, in this assignment you will need to explain what Erik Peterson should have done to apply the leadership principles we studied to have achieved a successful outcome.

Thoughtfully consider what Richard Jenkins expected Erik Peterson to do when he promoted him to acting general manager (GM) with overall authority for Biometra’s operations.   The “vice president who would have overseen the catheter product launched had left abruptly to join a startup device company.”  “A number of key Biometra managers had departed as well.”  Even though there were “many other SciMat product launches in progress,” this was an urgent, “high profile” product launch for Biometra.  For Erik Peterson, this was an opportunity of a lifetime and he was “both excited and daunted by this opportunity to have general management experience so early in his career.”

One caution as you approach this assignment.  Please do not fall into the trap of blaming others for Erik Peterson’s failure.  This is a course in managing people and organizations and in each module we study how to become a better manager and leader.  Unexpected things do happen – key people leave, problems arise, personality conflicts surface, competition changes, etc.  It’s true that that personnel issues and problems throughout the company resulted in Erik Peterson not having the mentoring he expected. However, there was so much more that Erik Peterson could have done. He could have at least picked up the phone and asked Richard Jenkins for help.  

12.2 Who Is a Leader? Trait Approaches to Leadership

12.3 What Do Leaders Do? Behavioral Approaches to Leadership

12.4 What Is the Role of the Context? Contingency Approaches to Leadership

12.5 What’s New? Contemporary Approaches to Leadership

Knowing what actually happened before submitting your written case study analysis makes this assignment a bit different that the rest of the case studies assigned in this course.  Instead of explaining what the protagonist should do, in this assignment you will need to explain what Erik Peterson should have done to apply the leadership principles we studied to have achieved a successful outcome.

Thoughtfully consider what Richard Jenkins expected Erik Peterson to do when he promoted him to acting general manager (GM) with overall authority for Biometra’s operations.   The “vice president who would have overseen the catheter product launched had left abruptly to join a startup device company.”  “A number of key Biometra managers had departed as well.”  Even though there were “many other SciMat product launches in progress,” this was an urgent, “high profile” product launch for Biometra.  For Erik Peterson, this was an opportunity of a lifetime and he was “both excited and daunted by this opportunity to have general management experience so early in his career.”

One caution as you approach this assignment.  Please do not fall into the trap of blaming others for Erik Peterson’s failure.  This is a course in managing people and organizations and in each module we study how to become a better manager and leader.  Unexpected things do happen – key people leave, problems arise, personality conflicts surface, competition changes, etc.  It’s true that that personnel issues and problems throughout the company resulted in Erik Peterson not having the mentoring he expected. However, there was so much more that Erik Peterson could have done. He could have at least picked up the phone and asked Richard Jenkins for help.  

12.2 Who Is a Leader? Trait Approaches to Leadership

12.3 What Do Leaders Do? Behavioral Approaches to Leadership

12.4 What Is the Role of the Context? Contingency Approaches to Leadership

12.5 What’s New? Contemporary Approaches to Leadership

Knowing what actually happened before submitting your written case study analysis makes this assignment a bit different that the rest of the case studies assigned in this course.  Instead of explaining what the protagonist should do, in this assignment you will need to explain what Erik Peterson should have done to apply the leadership principles we studied to have achieved a successful outcome.

Thoughtfully consider what Richard Jenkins expected Erik Peterson to do when he promoted him to acting general manager (GM) with overall authority for Biometra’s operations.   The “vice president who would have overseen the catheter product launched had left abruptly to join a startup device company.”  “A number of key Biometra managers had departed as well.”  Even though there were “many other SciMat product launches in progress,” this was an urgent, “high profile” product launch for Biometra.  For Erik Peterson, this was an opportunity of a lifetime and he was “both excited and daunted by this opportunity to have general management experience so early in his career.”

One caution as you approach this assignment.  Please do not fall into the trap of blaming others for Erik Peterson’s failure.  This is a course in managing people and organizations and in each module we study how to become a better manager and leader.  Unexpected things do happen – key people leave, problems arise, personality conflicts surface, competition changes, etc.  It’s true that that personnel issues and problems throughout the company resulted in Erik Peterson not having the mentoring he expected. However, there was so much more that Erik Peterson could have done. He could have at least picked up the phone and asked Richard Jenkins for help.  

12.2 Who Is a Leader? Trait Approaches to Leadership

12.3 What Do Leaders Do? Behavioral Approaches to Leadership

12.4 What Is the Role of the Context? Contingency Approaches to Leadership

12.5 What’s New? Contemporary Approaches to Leadership

Knowing what actually happened before submitting your written case study analysis makes this assignment a bit different that the rest of the case studies assigned in this course.  Instead of explaining what the protagonist should do, in this assignment you will need to explain what Erik Peterson should have done to apply the leadership principles we studied to have achieved a successful outcome.

Thoughtfully consider what Richard Jenkins expected Erik Peterson to do when he promoted him to acting general manager (GM) with overall authority for Biometra’s operations.   The “vice president who would have overseen the catheter product launched had left abruptly to join a startup device company.”  “A number of key Biometra managers had departed as well.”  Even though there were “many other SciMat product launches in progress,” this was an urgent, “high profile” product launch for Biometra.  For Erik Peterson, this was an opportunity of a lifetime and he was “both excited and daunted by this opportunity to have general management experience so early in his career.”

One caution as you approach this assignment.  Please do not fall into the trap of blaming others for Erik Peterson’s failure.  This is a course in managing people and organizations and in each module we study how to become a better manager and leader.  Unexpected things do happen – key people leave, problems arise, personality conflicts surface, competition changes, etc.  It’s true that that personnel issues and problems throughout the company resulted in Erik Peterson not having the mentoring he expected. However, there was so much more that Erik Peterson could have done. He could have at least picked up the phone and asked Richard Jenkins for help.  

12.2 Who Is a Leader? Trait Approaches to Leadership

12.3 What Do Leaders Do? Behavioral Approaches to Leadership

12.4 What Is the Role of the Context? Contingency Approaches to Leadership

12.5 What’s New? Contemporary Approaches to Leadership

Knowing what actually happened before submitting your written case study analysis makes this assignment a bit different that the rest of the case studies assigned in this course.  Instead of explaining what the protagonist should do, in this assignment you will need to explain what Erik Peterson should have done to apply the leadership principles we studied to have achieved a successful outcome.

Thoughtfully consider what Richard Jenkins expected Erik Peterson to do when he promoted him to acting general manager (GM) with overall authority for Biometra’s operations.   The “vice president who would have overseen the catheter product launched had left abruptly to join a startup device company.”  “A number of key Biometra managers had departed as well.”  Even though there were “many other SciMat product launches in progress,” this was an urgent, “high profile” product launch for Biometra.  For Erik Peterson, this was an opportunity of a lifetime and he was “both excited and daunted by this opportunity to have general management experience so early in his career.”

One caution as you approach this assignment.  Please do not fall into the trap of blaming others for Erik Peterson’s failure.  This is a course in managing people and organizations and in each module we study how to become a better manager and leader.  Unexpected things do happen – key people leave, problems arise, personality conflicts surface, competition changes, etc.  It’s true that that personnel issues and problems throughout the company resulted in Erik Peterson not having the mentoring he expected. However, there was so much more that Erik Peterson could have done. He could have at least picked up the phone and asked Richard Jenkins for help.  

12.2 Who Is a Leader? Trait Approaches to Leadership

12.3 What Do Leaders Do? Behavioral Approaches to Leadership

12.4 What Is the Role of the Context? Contingency Approaches to Leadership

12.5 What’s New? Contemporary Approaches to Leadership

Knowing what actually happened before submitting your written case study analysis makes this assignment a bit different that the rest of the case studies assigned in this course.  Instead of explaining what the protagonist should do, in this assignment you will need to explain what Erik Peterson should have done to apply the leadership principles we studied to have achieved a successful outcome.

Thoughtfully consider what Richard Jenkins expected Erik Peterson to do when he promoted him to acting general manager (GM) with overall authority for Biometra’s operations.   The “vice president who would have overseen the catheter product launched had left abruptly to join a startup device company.”  “A number of key Biometra managers had departed as well.”  Even though there were “many other SciMat product launches in progress,” this was an urgent, “high profile” product launch for Biometra.  For Erik Peterson, this was an opportunity of a lifetime and he was “both excited and daunted by this opportunity to have general management experience so early in his career.”

One caution as you approach this assignment.  Please do not fall into the trap of blaming others for Erik Peterson’s failure.  This is a course in managing people and organizations and in each module we study how to become a better manager and leader.  Unexpected things do happen – key people leave, problems arise, personality conflicts surface, competition changes, etc.  It’s true that that personnel issues and problems throughout the company resulted in Erik Peterson not having the mentoring he expected. However, there was so much more that Erik Peterson could have done. He could have at least picked up the phone and asked Richard Jenkins for help.  

12.2 Who Is a Leader? Trait Approaches to Leadership

12.3 What Do Leaders Do? Behavioral Approaches to Leadership

12.4 What Is the Role of the Context? Contingency Approaches to Leadership

12.5 What’s New? Contemporary Approaches to Leadership

Knowing what actually happened before submitting your written case study analysis makes this assignment a bit different that the rest of the case studies assigned in this course.  Instead of explaining what the protagonist should do, in this assignment you will need to explain what Erik Peterson should have done to apply the leadership principles we studied to have achieved a successful outcome.

Thoughtfully consider what Richard Jenkins expected Erik Peterson to do when he promoted him to acting general manager (GM) with overall authority for Biometra’s operations.   The “vice president who would have overseen the catheter product launched had left abruptly to join a startup device company.”  “A number of key Biometra managers had departed as well.”  Even though there were “many other SciMat product launches in progress,” this was an urgent, “high profile” product launch for Biometra.  For Erik Peterson, this was an opportunity of a lifetime and he was “both excited and daunted by this opportunity to have general management experience so early in his career.”

One caution as you approach this assignment.  Please do not fall into the trap of blaming others for Erik Peterson’s failure.  This is a course in managing people and organizations and in each module we study how to become a better manager and leader.  Unexpected things do happen – key people leave, problems arise, personality conflicts surface, competition changes, etc.  It’s true that that personnel issues and problems throughout the company resulted in Erik Peterson not having the mentoring he expected. However, there was so much more that Erik Peterson could have done. He could have at least picked up the phone and asked Richard Jenkins for help.  

12.2 Who Is a Leader? Trait Approaches to Leadership

12.3 What Do Leaders Do? Behavioral Approaches to Leadership

12.4 What Is the Role of the Context? Contingency Approaches to Leadership

12.5 What’s New? Contemporary Approaches to Leadership

Knowing what actually happened before submitting your written case study analysis makes this assignment a bit different that the rest of the case studies assigned in this course.  Instead of explaining what the protagonist should do, in this assignment you will need to explain what Erik Peterson should have done to apply the leadership principles we studied to have achieved a successful outcome.

Thoughtfully consider what Richard Jenkins expected Erik Peterson to do when he promoted him to acting general manager (GM) with overall authority for Biometra’s operations.   The “vice president who would have overseen the catheter product launched had left abruptly to join a startup device company.”  “A number of key Biometra managers had departed as well.”  Even though there were “many other SciMat product launches in progress,” this was an urgent, “high profile” product launch for Biometra.  For Erik Peterson, this was an opportunity of a lifetime and he was “both excited and daunted by this opportunity to have general management experience so early in his career.”

One caution as you approach this assignment.  Please do not fall into the trap of blaming others for Erik Peterson’s failure.  This is a course in managing people and organizations and in each module we study how to become a better manager and leader.  Unexpected things do happen – key people leave, problems arise, personality conflicts surface, competition changes, etc.  It’s true that that personnel issues and problems throughout the company resulted in Erik Peterson not having the mentoring he expected. However, there was so much more that Erik Peterson could have done. He could have at least picked up the phone and asked Richard Jenkins for help.  

12.2 Who Is a Leader? Trait Approaches to Leadership

12.3 What Do Leaders Do? Behavioral Approaches to Leadership

12.4 What Is the Role of the Context? Contingency Approaches to Leadership

12.5 What’s New? Contemporary Approaches to Leadership

Knowing what actually happened before submitting your written case study analysis makes this assignment a bit different that the rest of the case studies assigned in this course.  Instead of explaining what the protagonist should do, in this assignment you will need to explain what Erik Peterson should have done to apply the leadership principles we studied to have achieved a successful outcome.

Thoughtfully consider what Richard Jenkins expected Erik Peterson to do when he promoted him to acting general manager (GM) with overall authority for Biometra’s operations.   The “vice president who would have overseen the catheter product launched had left abruptly to join a startup device company.”  “A number of key Biometra managers had departed as well.”  Even though there were “many other SciMat product launches in progress,” this was an urgent, “high profile” product launch for Biometra.  For Erik Peterson, this was an opportunity of a lifetime and he was “both excited and daunted by this opportunity to have general management experience so early in his career.”

One caution as you approach this assignment.  Please do not fall into the trap of blaming others for Erik Peterson’s failure.  This is a course in managing people and organizations and in each module we study how to become a better manager and leader.  Unexpected things do happen – key people leave, problems arise, personality conflicts surface, competition changes, etc.  It’s true that that personnel issues and problems throughout the company resulted in Erik Peterson not having the mentoring he expected. However, there was so much more that Erik Peterson could have done. He could have at least picked up the phone and asked Richard Jenkins for help.  

12.2 Who Is a Leader? Trait Approaches to Leadership

12.3 What Do Leaders Do? Behavioral Approaches to Leadership

12.4 What Is the Role of the Context? Contingency Approaches to Leadership

12.5 What’s New? Contemporary Approaches to Leadership

Knowing what actually happened before submitting your written case study analysis makes this assignment a bit different that the rest of the case studies assigned in this course.  Instead of explaining what the protagonist should do, in this assignment you will need to explain what Erik Peterson should have done to apply the leadership principles we studied to have achieved a successful outcome.

Thoughtfully consider what Richard Jenkins expected Erik Peterson to do when he promoted him to acting general manager (GM) with overall authority for Biometra’s operations.   The “vice president who would have overseen the catheter product launched had left abruptly to join a startup device company.”  “A number of key Biometra managers had departed as well.”  Even though there were “many other SciMat product launches in progress,” this was an urgent, “high profile” product launch for Biometra.  For Erik Peterson, this was an opportunity of a lifetime and he was “both excited and daunted by this opportunity to have general management experience so early in his career.”

One caution as you approach this assignment.  Please do not fall into the trap of blaming others for Erik Peterson’s failure.  This is a course in managing people and organizations and in each module we study how to become a better manager and leader.  Unexpected things do happen – key people leave, problems arise, personality conflicts surface, competition changes, etc.  It’s true that that personnel issues and problems throughout the company resulted in Erik Peterson not having the mentoring he expected. However, there was so much more that Erik Peterson could have done. He could have at least picked up the phone and asked Richard Jenkins for help.  

12.2 Who Is a Leader? Trait Approaches to Leadership

12.3 What Do Leaders Do? Behavioral Approaches to Leadership

12.4 What Is the Role of the Context? Contingency Approaches to Leadership

12.5 What’s New? Contemporary Approaches to Leadership

Knowing what actually happened before submitting your written case study analysis makes this assignment a bit different that the rest of the case studies assigned in this course.  Instead of explaining what the protagonist should do, in this assignment you will need to explain what Erik Peterson should have done to apply the leadership principles we studied to have achieved a successful outcome.

Thoughtfully consider what Richard Jenkins expected Erik Peterson to do when he promoted him to acting general manager (GM) with overall authority for Biometra’s operations.   The “vice president who would have overseen the catheter product launched had left abruptly to join a startup device company.”  “A number of key Biometra managers had departed as well.”  Even though there were “many other SciMat product launches in progress,” this was an urgent, “high profile” product launch for Biometra.  For Erik Peterson, this was an opportunity of a lifetime and he was “both excited and daunted by this opportunity to have general management experience so early in his career.”

One caution as you approach this assignment.  Please do not fall into the trap of blaming others for Erik Peterson’s failure.  This is a course in managing people and organizations and in each module we study how to become a better manager and leader.  Unexpected things do happen – key people leave, problems arise, personality conflicts surface, competition changes, etc.  It’s true that that personnel issues and problems throughout the company resulted in Erik Peterson not having the mentoring he expected. However, there was so much more that Erik Peterson could have done. He could have at least picked up the phone and asked Richard Jenkins for help.  

12.2 Who Is a Leader? Trait Approaches to Leadership

12.3 What Do Leaders Do? Behavioral Approaches to Leadership

12.4 What Is the Role of the Context? Contingency Approaches to Leadership

12.5 What’s New? Contemporary Approaches to Leadership

Knowing what actually happened before submitting your written case study analysis makes this assignment a bit different that the rest of the case studies assigned in this course.  Instead of explaining what the protagonist should do, in this assignment you will need to explain what Erik Peterson should have done to apply the leadership principles we studied to have achieved a successful outcome.

Thoughtfully consider what Richard Jenkins expected Erik Peterson to do when he promoted him to acting general manager (GM) with overall authority for Biometra’s operations.   The “vice president who would have overseen the catheter product launched had left abruptly to join a startup device company.”  “A number of key Biometra managers had departed as well.”  Even though there were “many other SciMat product launches in progress,” this was an urgent, “high profile” product launch for Biometra.  For Erik Peterson, this was an opportunity of a lifetime and he was “both excited and daunted by this opportunity to have general management experience so early in his career.”

One caution as you approach this assignment.  Please do not fall into the trap of blaming others for Erik Peterson’s failure.  This is a course in managing people and organizations and in each module we study how to become a better manager and leader.  Unexpected things do happen – key people leave, problems arise, personality conflicts surface, competition changes, etc.  It’s true that that personnel issues and problems throughout the company resulted in Erik Peterson not having the mentoring he expected. However, there was so much more that Erik Peterson could have done. He could have at least picked up the phone and asked Richard Jenkins for help.  

12.2 Who Is a Leader? Trait Approaches to Leadership

12.3 What Do Leaders Do? Behavioral Approaches to Leadership

12.4 What Is the Role of the Context? Contingency Approaches to Leadership

12.5 What’s New? Contemporary Approaches to Leadership

Knowing what actually happened before submitting your written case study analysis makes this assignment a bit different that the rest of the case studies assigned in this course.  Instead of explaining what the protagonist should do, in this assignment you will need to explain what Erik Peterson should have done to apply the leadership principles we studied to have achieved a successful outcome.

Thoughtfully consider what Richard Jenkins expected Erik Peterson to do when he promoted him to acting general manager (GM) with overall authority for Biometra’s operations.   The “vice president who would have overseen the catheter product launched had left abruptly to join a startup device company.”  “A number of key Biometra managers had departed as well.”  Even though there were “many other SciMat product launches in progress,” this was an urgent, “high profile” product launch for Biometra.  For Erik Peterson, this was an opportunity of a lifetime and he was “both excited and daunted by this opportunity to have general management experience so early in his career.”

One caution as you approach this assignment.  Please do not fall into the trap of blaming others for Erik Peterson’s failure.  This is a course in managing people and organizations and in each module we study how to become a better manager and leader.  Unexpected things do happen – key people leave, problems arise, personality conflicts surface, competition changes, etc.  It’s true that that personnel issues and problems throughout the company resulted in Erik Peterson not having the mentoring he expected. However, there was so much more that Erik Peterson could have done. He could have at least picked up the phone and asked Richard Jenkins for help.  

12.2 Who Is a Leader? Trait Approaches to Leadership

12.3 What Do Leaders Do? Behavioral Approaches to Leadership

12.4 What Is the Role of the Context? Contingency Approaches to Leadership

12.5 What’s New? Contemporary Approaches to Leadership

Knowing what actually happened before submitting your written case study analysis makes this assignment a bit different that the rest of the case studies assigned in this course.  Instead of explaining what the protagonist should do, in this assignment you will need to explain what Erik Peterson should have done to apply the leadership principles we studied to have achieved a successful outcome.

Thoughtfully consider what Richard Jenkins expected Erik Peterson to do when he promoted him to acting general manager (GM) with overall authority for Biometra’s operations.   The “vice president who would have overseen the catheter product launched had left abruptly to join a startup device company.”  “A number of key Biometra managers had departed as well.”  Even though there were “many other SciMat product launches in progress,” this was an urgent, “high profile” product launch for Biometra.  For Erik Peterson, this was an opportunity of a lifetime and he was “both excited and daunted by this opportunity to have general management experience so early in his career.”

One caution as you approach this assignment.  Please do not fall into the trap of blaming others for Erik Peterson’s failure.  This is a course in managing people and organizations and in each module we study how to become a better manager and leader.  Unexpected things do happen – key people leave, problems arise, personality conflicts surface, competition changes, etc.  It’s true that that personnel issues and problems throughout the company resulted in Erik Peterson not having the mentoring he expected. However, there was so much more that Erik Peterson could have done. He could have at least picked up the phone and asked Richard Jenkins for help.  

12.2 Who Is a Leader? Trait Approaches to Leadership

12.3 What Do Leaders Do? Behavioral Approaches to Leadership

12.4 What Is the Role of the Context? Contingency Approaches to Leadership

12.5 What’s New? Contemporary Approaches to Leadership

Knowing what actually happened before submitting your written case study analysis makes this assignment a bit different that the rest of the case studies assigned in this course.  Instead of explaining what the protagonist should do, in this assignment you will need to explain what Erik Peterson should have done to apply the leadership principles we studied to have achieved a successful outcome.

Thoughtfully consider what Richard Jenkins expected Erik Peterson to do when he promoted him to acting general manager (GM) with overall authority for Biometra’s operations.   The “vice president who would have overseen the catheter product launched had left abruptly to join a startup device company.”  “A number of key Biometra managers had departed as well.”  Even though there were “many other SciMat product launches in progress,” this was an urgent, “high profile” product launch for Biometra.  For Erik Peterson, this was an opportunity of a lifetime and he was “both excited and daunted by this opportunity to have general management experience so early in his career.”

One caution as you approach this assignment.  Please do not fall into the trap of blaming others for Erik Peterson’s failure.  This is a course in managing people and organizations and in each module we study how to become a better manager and leader.  Unexpected things do happen – key people leave, problems arise, personality conflicts surface, competition changes, etc.  It’s true that that personnel issues and problems throughout the company resulted in Erik Peterson not having the mentoring he expected. However, there was so much more that Erik Peterson could have done. He could have at least picked up the phone and asked Richard Jenkins for help.  

12.2 Who Is a Leader? Trait Approaches to Leadership

12.3 What Do Leaders Do? Behavioral Approaches to Leadership

12.4 What Is the Role of the Context? Contingency Approaches to Leadership

12.5 What’s New? Contemporary Approaches to Leadership

Knowing what actually happened before submitting your written case study analysis makes this assignment a bit different that the rest of the case studies assigned in this course.  Instead of explaining what the protagonist should do, in this assignment you will need to explain what Erik Peterson should have done to apply the leadership principles we studied to have achieved a successful outcome.

Thoughtfully consider what Richard Jenkins expected Erik Peterson to do when he promoted him to acting general manager (GM) with overall authority for Biometra’s operations.   The “vice president who would have overseen the catheter product launched had left abruptly to join a startup device company.”  “A number of key Biometra managers had departed as well.”  Even though there were “many other SciMat product launches in progress,” this was an urgent, “high profile” product launch for Biometra.  For Erik Peterson, this was an opportunity of a lifetime and he was “both excited and daunted by this opportunity to have general management experience so early in his career.”

One caution as you approach this assignment.  Please do not fall into the trap of blaming others for Erik Peterson’s failure.  This is a course in managing people and organizations and in each module we study how to become a better manager and leader.  Unexpected things do happen – key people leave, problems arise, personality conflicts surface, competition changes, etc.  It’s true that that personnel issues and problems throughout the company resulted in Erik Peterson not having the mentoring he expected. However, there was so much more that Erik Peterson could have done. He could have at least picked up the phone and asked Richard Jenkins for help.  

12.2 Who Is a Leader? Trait Approaches to Leadership

12.3 What Do Leaders Do? Behavioral Approaches to Leadership

12.4 What Is the Role of the Context? Contingency Approaches to Leadership

12.5 What’s New? Contemporary Approaches to Leadership

Knowing what actually happened before submitting your written case study analysis makes this assignment a bit different that the rest of the case studies assigned in this course.  Instead of explaining what the protagonist should do, in this assignment you will need to explain what Erik Peterson should have done to apply the leadership principles we studied to have achieved a successful outcome.

Thoughtfully consider what Richard Jenkins expected Erik Peterson to do when he promoted him to acting general manager (GM) with overall authority for Biometra’s operations.   The “vice president who would have overseen the catheter product launched had left abruptly to join a startup device company.”  “A number of key Biometra managers had departed as well.”  Even though there were “many other SciMat product launches in progress,” this was an urgent, “high profile” product launch for Biometra.  For Erik Peterson, this was an opportunity of a lifetime and he was “both excited and daunted by this opportunity to have general management experience so early in his career.”

One caution as you approach this assignment.  Please do not fall into the trap of blaming others for Erik Peterson’s failure.  This is a course in managing people and organizations and in each module we study how to become a better manager and leader.  Unexpected things do happen – key people leave, problems arise, personality conflicts surface, competition changes, etc.  It’s true that that personnel issues and problems throughout the company resulted in Erik Peterson not having the mentoring he expected. However, there was so much more that Erik Peterson could have done. He could have at least picked up the phone and asked Richard Jenkins for help.  

12.2 Who Is a Leader? Trait Approaches to Leadership

12.3 What Do Leaders Do? Behavioral Approaches to Leadership

12.4 What Is the Role of the Context? Contingency Approaches to Leadership

12.5 What’s New? Contemporary Approaches to Leadership

Calculate your order
Pages (275 words)
Standard price: $0.00
Client Reviews
4.9
Sitejabber
4.6
Trustpilot
4.8
Our Guarantees
100% Confidentiality
Information about customers is confidential and never disclosed to third parties.
Original Writing
We complete all papers from scratch. You can get a plagiarism report.
Timely Delivery
No missed deadlines – 97% of assignments are completed in time.
Money Back
If you're confident that a writer didn't follow your order details, ask for a refund.

Calculate the price of your order

You will get a personal manager and a discount.
We'll send you the first draft for approval by at
Total price:
$0.00
Power up Your Academic Success with the
Team of Professionals. We’ve Got Your Back.
Power up Your Study Success with Experts We’ve Got Your Back.

Order your essay today and save 30% with the discount code ESSAYHELP