answer
threatresponsesw xthreatsresponse.edited xDisasterRecovery.edited.edited.edited xCarhacking.edited xSurveillancestate1 xDoc2WW11 x
Running head: SECUREX
1
SECUREX 4
Internal control
Professor’s name:
Student’s name:
Date:
What does the software do?
Cisco SecureX threat response software accelerates hunting and manages threat by correlating and aggregating intelligence and data across the infrastructure of the user. One of the scarcest resources in organizations is time and there is the need to eliminate manual processes from organizations as a measure for efficient threat response. SecureX has a structural design that simplifies threats with automated response to investigation. Cisco SecureX software enables automation, unifies visibility, and reinforces security across applications, endpoints, cloud, and networks.
What are its major features?
Aggregated threat intelligence – automatic integration and confirmation of threat intelligence from Cisco Talos and other third-party sources with the aid of research indicators of choice.
Automated enrichment – allows you to know which and how your system was targeted by automatically adding context from integrated Cisco Security products.
Intuitive, interactive visualization – it is quick and easy to make conclusions as results are shown with configurable graphs and intuitive, thus there is better situational awareness.
Incident tracking – key investigation information is easily collected, stored, managed and documented from findings.
Seamless drill down – by use of integrated Cisco Security products deeper investigations are made including malicious files.
Direct remediation – SecureX lets you correct action of blocking domains, suspicious files without log in to other products.
What kind of training is required?
All customers are trained on maintenance and updates and should have the skills to updating security patches; they are also trained on how to renew their license.
How much does the software cost?
SecureX cost is free as long as the products are licensed and well certified.
References
Cisco SecureX threat response – Security that works together. (n.d.). Cisco.
https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/products/security/threat-response.html
Cisco threat response data sheet. (n.d.). Cisco.
https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/products/collateral/security/datasheet-c78-743307.html
Threat response software
Professor’s name:
Student’s name:
Date
THREAT RESPONSE SOFTWARE
1
2
THREAT RESPONSE SOFTWARE
Introduction
Threat response software is a software that reports insecurity alerts to the system if it has been targeted by the malware. The software of my concern is the security information and event management software, which is concerned with the log and data collection security software. The software where analysts of security are allowed to focus more on detailed logs of security and events. It will enable analysts of security to carry out analysis of security threats from the computer systems. The software works automatically in the background for identification of security threats that possible attacks within the operating system proactively. The provider of security information and event management software are clarifying the balance between quick identification the risks and breaches that fold the information technology administrators with false positives (Johnson, 2013).
The majors feature of Security Information and Event Management software includes: log information correction, log normalization, flexibility deployment, custom dashboards and views, hosting and network-based intrusion detection, centralized event, and log data collation, and integrating management tools for accessibility and identification. The security data and event management software are widely from about 5000 dollars to over 100,000 dollars, depending mainly on the number of events and logs being monitored, which will include total ownership will consist of maintenance, professional services, hardware personnel, and training. The kind of training required for one to able to operate the software is skills training, which involves proficiencies that are required to perform the job (Nahari & Krutz, 2011).
Conclusion
In conclusion, security information and event management software is the best software for threats in the operating system within the information technology industry (Johnson, 2013).
References
Johnson, R. (2013). Antiterrorism and threat response: Planning and implementation. CRC Press.
Nahari, H., & Krutz, R. L. (2011). Web commerce security: Design and development. John Wiley & Sons.
Running Head: RECOVERY OF A DISASTER 2
RECOVERY OF A DISASTER 2
Recover of a disaster
Student’s Name:
Professor’s Name:
Date:
Abstract
Recovery of disaster is a field of security planning that works toward protecting a company from the impacts of greater adverse effects. Having a strategy of disaster planning in place enables an organization to maintain resume mission-important function, quickly succeeding a disturbance. An organization must come up with a team for recovery to develop plans of recovery of a disaster that includes recognizing and evaluating the risk of a disaster, deciding vital applications, stating the procedure of a backup. Other protocols might be contained in the plan based on the company. A disaster recovery plan is a documented procedure or process to carry out disaster recovery processes of an organization to recover and secure a business IT infrastructure in a disaster situation. There are various classifications of recovery for disaster plans such as cloud-based recovery from disaster, virtualization recovery from disaster, disaster recovery as a service, and data center disaster recovery.
Types
There are various classifications of data recovery plans, such as; data center recovery from disaster; in this type, the plan of recovery of data is not restricted to the facility. It is accommodated. The whole facility plays a significant importance in data center disaster recovery. Tools and features inside the facility, like support personnel, fire suppression, physical security, power backup, utility providers, and HVAC, impact data center data recovery. In the situation of any type of outage, these components inside the building must function properly. The other type is a cloud-based recovery for disaster; when using this approach, the organization can cut costs through a cloud data service provider center as a site recovery rather than using up more on its own data center staff, systems, and facilities. The user gains from the competition between the providers of the cloud as they continuously try to outdo one another in the market.
The other type is virtualization recovery from disaster; the virtualization invalidates the requirement to reform a physical server in a disaster situation. The organization can also obtain its premeditated recovery time goals more efficiently by putting a virtue server on cloud or reserve capacity. The other one is recovering from a disaster as a service; while it is regularly found in the cloud, it is not solely based on the cloud. Service providers of recovery from a disaster as a service provide their expertise as a service of site-to-site, where they run and host a site. That is secondary. They also enable users to immediately failover applications, reconnect users via Remote Desktop Protocol or VPN, and orchestrate failback to rebuilt servers (Hanna, 2019).
Elements of disaster recovery
A company can protect and prepare itself from disaster by developing and implementing a plan for recovery of a disaster. It should develop a recovery of a disaster plan that can cover any sort of calamity. That plan can not be difficult to understand and follow and be modified to fulfill the company’s distinctive requirements. Usually, elements in a plan for recovery of a disaster should include creating a recovery team. The team will have a duty to develop, implement, and maintain the data recovery plan. The plan should discern the members of the team, define the duties of every member, and give their contact information. The plan should also name the one to be called in the case of a disaster. All workers should be educated on their duties if there is an emergency of a disaster.
The other element is identifying and evaluate risks of a disaster; the team for disaster recovery should recognize and evaluate the risk to the company. This should be inclusive of incidents associated with technology, natural disasters, and human-made emergencies. This will help the team to identify the strategies of recovery and the required resources needed to recover from disasters within an acceptable and predetermined timeframe. The other is determining important applications, documents, and resources; that the businesses must appraise its business processes to decide which are crucial to its functioning. The plan should concentrate on short-term survivability, like revenue and cash flow generation, instead of a long-term answer to reinstating a company’s full operational capabilities. Still, the company must identify that some processes should not be, if feasible, delayed.
Another element is specifying off-site storage and backup procedures; these protocols should recognize what should be backed up, who to do it, how to, backup position, and how often backups should happen. All necessary equipment, applications, and the document should be backed up. The organization should regard documents that the organization should regard as a tax return, inventory records, the latest financial statements, customer and vendor listings, and a current record of workers and their contact data. Vital suppliers needed for daily operations, like purchase orders and checks and a copy of the disaster recovery planning, should be stored at an off-site location. The other one is maintaining the data recovery plan; it is a process that is continual as disaster and emergency risk are always changing. The recovery team should often modernize help the plan to sustain changes in the process of business, evolving disaster risks, and technology. The company must set up a recovery group to generate a plan of a disaster recovery that includes risks identifying and evaluating of a disaster, deciding important applications, and describing procedures of backup (Mksh, 2020).
Importance
Data recovery is a vital part of the plan of continuity of business and acknowledges adequate recovery of IT and loss of data avoidance. The apparent advantage of possessing a disaster recovery plan in the continuity of a business, whatever the situations. There are various advantages of a disaster recovery plan; increased worker productivity and the data recovery plan will have to be carried out by the appropriate individuals. When certain responsibilities and roles are allocated in advance, productivity and effectiveness will both increase. In some cases, disaster recovery planning can mean having two individuals who can handle the same job. The other benefit is greater retention of customers; customers today anticipate nothing short of reliability and perfection. Disaster planning enables the organization to maintain a high-quality service, whatever the circumstances.
Another benefit is a good fathoming of scalability; one of the main things an organization will need to do when planning recovery of a disaster recognizes creative ideas. Technologies such as cloud-based storage of backups and data make it easy for the process of record maintenance, improve the backup effectiveness, and lower disaster recovery costs. Since cloud choices are scalable easily, they provide more flexibility than an offsite or onsite data center maintenance. The other one is efficiency in cost, On-time updates, and selecting for more creativity in software and hardware development that can save the company much finance in the long term. Besides, an even significant shift is being seen with and more companies that adopt cloud-based management of data rather than local operations and storage.
This central shaft, as a recovery for disaster planning part, can reduce the maintenance cost of comprehensive archive backups development (Evolve IP, 2020). As we conclude, disaster recovery planning is an important factor that every organization should adopt. By disaster recovery planning, the organizations are assured of the continuity of their business even after the emergence of the disaster. It is hard to avoid a catastrophe, though having a disaster recovery plan reduces possible damage, gets back to functional mode quickly, and lower the cost of damage. Organizations should adopt disaster recovery planning to secure their businesses.
References
Evolve IP. (2020, March 16). Four benefits of disaster recovery planning.
https://www.evolveip.net/blog/4-benefits-disaster-recovery-planning
Hanna, T. (2019, July 8). Top 4 types of disaster recovery plans. Best Backup and Disaster Recovery Vendors, Software Demos, Tools, News & Reviews.
Mksh. (2020, April 9). Five elements of a disaster recovery plan – Is your business prepared? – MKSH. MKSH.
5 Elements of a Disaster Recovery Plan – Is Your Business Prepared?
Running Head: CAR HACKING 1
CAR HACKING 6
Car hacking
Professor’s name:
Student’s name:
Date
Abstract
The modern car is a set of an interconnected network of information systems, and that has been rapidly adopted in the last few years, ranging from semiautonomous to self-driving cars. As the car becomes progressively computerized, so does its vulnerability and attack aspect. Researchers recently confirmed a sequence of vulnerabilities in-car systems causing malfunctions and posing a threat to public and individual safety. Up to this point, it is clear that car manufacturers have not stressed enough on establishing secure automobile information systems. Automakers are tussling to accept and deal with the need to secure vehicle control and performance systems. As a result, the modern car presents an attractive target, with a broad attack surface and an infinitude of prospective vulnerabilities to maneuver. This paper analyzes car security vulnerabilities and attests to the need for extra secure modern cars.
Introduction
In the developed world, a car is the most extensively owned appliance. For instance, in the USA, there is scarcely a home without a car or related appliances. In the evolution of technology, cars have not been left out either. Modern cars with computer-enabled systems have prevailed in the automobiles market due to their capability of making work easier for the user and their eco-friendly features. The modern car relies on computerization for engine management, navigation, braking, infotainment system, and overall control systems. This contributes to the term ‘computer on wheels’ meaning that they have similar vulnerabilities to those of computers. The increased dependability on computers translates to a vast attack surface and increased prospective exposures. Hackers use this setback and try various ways to vandalize cars for different intentions (Lugner, 2018).
Car hacking is the ability to manipulate a computer-operated vehicle remotely by exploiting vulnerabilities within the software, hardware, and communication systems. Various car hacking demonstrations have brought attention to the fact that modern cars are an insecure lot. More than ever, car manufacturers are coming to terms with car system security is a big deal. A connected car has a network of wires which a car control commands and sensor data convey through. Such cars have a central operator in the diagnostic board under the steering wheel from which the controller issues commands to the car components as per the input. As a result of the interconnectivity of the systems, an attacker can enter through a vulnerability in the infotainment system and, through it, exploit the safety and control systems of the car. A weakness in one component of the car grants an attacker access to the rest of the car’s system. Unlike personal computers, a car cannot detect when a hacker is manipulating its system until the damage is done (Knight, 2020).
Mechanisms of attack
A car’s mainframe can be accessed through the Telematic system, an mp3 malware, unauthorized apps, and key fob. They can all be accessed by exploiting specific vulnerabilities. The Telematic System is used to control any system connected to the CAN bus and disable the ignition system. MP3 files might contain audios with a virus code that can penetrate the CAN bus and disable the breaks and other connected systems. Most hacks are staged in car repair shops by infecting computers in the shop and consequently passed to the cars through the diagnostic port. A Bluetooth enabled system and cellular networks in use are also an attractive vulnerability to hackers (Möller & Haas, 2018).
During a hack, the whole system is remotely accessible and manipulatable, and it is not possible to reboot while the car is in motion. A hacker can take control of the car through the system, track location, unlock and start a parked vehicle, disable emergency assistance, and get access to connected devices that contain valuable and confidential information.
For self-driving vehicles, there is a total security compromise. This is because overriding the car system is possible, which adds to the potential of hacking and vulnerabilities.
The adversity of a system’s vulnerability can be partially solved by avoiding public internet providers and Wi-Fi services that are frequently used in hacking. Close observation of the car during a repair and maintenance visit to help identify any abnormalities in the system and scan mp3 files before using them on the car stereo to avoid any virus codes instilled in them can also limit the threats. These are primary but necessary security steps but are not applicable in more sophisticated hacks (Stolarz, 2005).
Uses of exploits
Car hacks are mostly purposed for a terrorist or homicide attack. They can be used to create terror and confusion to the occupants, cause bodily harm, retrieve confidential and valuable information, and car theft or damage. The hackers can achieve this by manipulating the car’s system to the sudden application of breaks, seatbelt tightening, blasting the car horn, engine acceleration, and change of speedometer and gas gauge.
However, not all hacking is meant for malicious motives. Some hacking is purposed for good. One can legally hack a self-owned car in case of theft to track the location and also to remotely kill the ignition and recover it. The authorities can also hack a car’s system if it is involved in a crime to determine or confirm the owner’s whereabouts on the crime occurrence. Computer science professionals perform a white-hat hacking that is meant for penetration testing to determine vulnerabilities in a car’s system and the possibility of hacking so as to come up with mitigation procedures (Smith, 2016).
Conclusion
Modern cars are a simplification of transport, and this makes them a necessity. Therefore, it is a responsibility to the car manufacturers and software security expertise to provide a solution to the security threats involved with modern cars. The public has been made aware of the security issues related to modern cars, and therefore, the developers are obligated to come up with a solution. The problem is profound and complicated and reaching mitigation is highly expensive and challenging but equally necessary. Car manufacturers ought to stop covering security inadequacies and start manufacturing secure automobile systems. Car computer systems have a lengthy development process and an equally long, anticipated life span. The attached security threats persist with time, and this can only be avoided by the manufacture of cars with secure systems.
References
Knight, A. (2020). Hacking connected cars: Tactics, techniques, and procedures. John Wiley & Sons.
Lugner, P. (2018). Vehicle dynamics of modern passenger cars. Springer.
Möller, D. P., & Haas, R. E. (2018). Guide to automotive connectivity and cybersecurity: Trends, technologies, innovations, and applications. Springer.
Smith, C. (2016). The car hacker’s handbook: A guide for the penetration Tester. No Starch Press.
Stolarz, D. (2005). Car PC hacks: Tips & tools for Geeking your ride. O’Reilly Media.
Running head: SURVEILLANCE 1
SURVEILLANCE 7
Why Surveillance state is a dangerous annotated bibliography
Student’s name:
Institution:
Date:
Why Surveillance state is a dangerous annotated bibliography
Loader, B. D., & Thomas, D. (2013). Cybercrime: Security and surveillance in the Information Age. Routledge.
The article on the dangers of surveillance authored by loader and Thomas published in 2013, demonstrates that our laws and culture are characterized by endless warnings regarding insecurities threats on our lives. The article’s main focus was on the various dangers of surveillance, one of them being that we lack adequate understanding of what privacy alludes to and why it matters (Loader & Thomas, 2013).
The author demonstrated that despite laws that safeguard us against the state regime surveillance, secret government programs could not be challenged until detected (Loader & Thomas, 2013). Besides, the law of administration offers minimal protections to the citizens as courts will continually dismiss any allegations challenging such programs and demonstrate that surveillance creates no harm to the people.
Wallaby, K. (2018). Review of Birch all’s Shareveillance: The dangers of openly sharing and covertly collecting data. Surveillance & Society, 16(2), 261-262. doi:10.24908/ss.v16i2.11627
The first article considered for that annotated bibliography is tiled dangers of openly sharing and covertly gathering data authored by Walby in and published in 2018. The author focused on theorizing politics and subjectivity in the era of big data where people voluntarily share their information than ever before. The author has embraced the notion of anti-politicized rather than depolarized and further explains why it would be a more accurate rendering of today’s political subjectivity (Walby, 2018). The article demonstrates that surveillances operate to foreclose the forms of politics even before they transpire.
The article is resourceful in demonstrating that the increased tendencies to share our data’s in our entrepreneurial economy are characterized by various forms of risks and responsibilities on the data. The article offers insights on the fact that closed government data are details which the broader public has no access to or knowledge of such national wades security decisions. The article opens readers’ eyes to the fact that the surveillance will remain an impressively and rich conceptual work that offers diverse terms and questions for contemplating and investigating the digital world we have developed. The author expresses her desire to see more reflections on the correlation between the creative interruptions of surveillances on the one hand and the social movements and collective actions on the other hand.
Butcher, B. (2020). Not-so-SMART: Why the new platform and surveillance technologies are bad news for science and understanding. Geoforum, 112, 3-5. doi:10.1016/j.geoforum.2019.12.009
The third article considered for the annotated bibliography is titled why the new platforms and surveillance are bad news for the science and understanding, authored by Butcher in 2017. The author focused on engaging with the latest technologies for the data processing associated with research outputs, connectivity, and management. He further focused on the surveillance state’s role in the degradation of scientific understanding and relations by reducing them to simple numerical forms of clicks and hits (Büscher, 2020).
The at ice is insightful in depicting that the emerging technologies tend to be heralded by making research and publication more efficient and creating better connectivity between researchers and in the development of disparate forms of research information together to enhance the research quality and management of productivity. Besides this, that article further concluded by exploring alternatives based on decentralized diversity in the researcher. Insightful examples of Elsevier’s technologies and the surveillance platforms are offered in the report as sources of impacts of the new technologies and surveillance being based on but playing a pivotal role in demeaning the scientific shreds of evidence.
Hong, S. (2017). Criticizing surveillance and surveillance critique: Why privacy and humanism are necessary but insufficient. Surveillance & Society, 15(2), 187-203. doi:10.24908/ss.v15i2.5441
The fourth article considered for that assignment is titled rightsizing surveillance and surveillance critiques, which focus one why human privacy and humanism are critical, although insufficient. The report focused on examining two existing frames of criticism: privacy and humanism, and further demonstrates that they are necessary; however, adequate tools t for a positive critique (Hong, 2017). The author analyses the risks and security and the various foundations that ground the pre-existing and existing surveillance rationalizations.
The article has adequately delineated the current surveillance debates both in academics and in public, which is continuously tempted towards a negative criticism of the existing surveillance systems. The authors offer an insightful point of view that a positive SC
Critique would more appropriate in seeking to present an alternative means of thinking, evaluating, and even undertaking surveillance. S lively critique question is depicted to subvert the epistemological foundations s management ought to be held accountable by terms other than its development as demonstrated in the article.
Citron $ Grey. (, 2013). ADDRESSING THE HARM OF TOTAL SURVEILLANCE: A REPLY TO PROFESSOR NEIL RICHARDS. Retrieved from https://digitalcommons.law.umaryland.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2335&context=fac_pubs
The fifth and final article considered for the analysis is tiled addressing the harms of total surveillance and the piece’s primary focus. The authors demonstrate that our contemporary societies’ ethos is that the more the data, the better. The author has majored in how the ate governments can solve the various challenges and risks associated with gathering individual data and aggregations of the information by agencies, industries, hospitals, and the silicon valley.
The article offers insights into how people actively utilize modern technologies to gather, analyze, and use data from other people. Instead of being silos, the data gathering and surveillance systems are often linked, shared, and integrated. A typical example of the Alabama, which is a broader surveillance system supported by the regime, is offered as a result of this, citizens, congressional panels, and journalists are informed that the fusion centers raise minimal security concerns and that the data gathering is quite focused and valuable. Despite these assurances, that author demonstrates that the fusion centers are continually eroding the civil liberties and lack concomitant h gain for the safety. The article insightfully depicts the fusion centers as casting a wide and indiscriminate net as they gather all details regarding an individual.
References
Büscher, B. (2020). Not-so-SMART: Why new platform and surveillance technologies are bad news for science and understanding. Geoforum, 112, 3-5. doi:10.1016/j.geoforum.2019.12.009
Citron $ Grey. (2013). ADDRESSING THE HARM OF TOTAL SURVEILLANCE: A REPLY TO PROFESSOR NEIL RICHARDS. Retrieved from https://digitalcommons.law.umaryland.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2335&context=fac_pubs
Hong, S. (2017). Criticising surveillance and surveillance critique: Why privacy and humanism are necessary but insufficient. Surveillance & Society, 15(2), 187-203. doi:10.24908/ss.v15i2.5441
Loader, B. D., & Thomas, D. (2013). Cybercrime: Security and surveillance in the Information Age. Routledge.
Walby, K. (2018). Review of Birchall’s Shareveillance: The dangers of openly sharing and covertly collecting data. Surveillance & Society, 16(2), 261-262. doi:10.24908/ss.v16i2.11627
Running head: SURVEILLANCE CAPITALISM 1
SURVEILLANCE CAPITALISM 7
Surveillance Capitalism-Centered Around Commodification
Student’s name:
Institution:
Date:
Surveillance Capitalism-Centered Around Commodification
Annotated Bibliography
Zuboff, Shoshana.
“Big Other: Surveillance Capitalism and the Prospects of an Information Civilization.”
Journal of Information Technology 30, no. 1 (March 2015): 75–89.
The first article considered for the annotated bibliography is titled surveillance capitalism and an information civilization’s prospects. The report focuses on the emergent logic of accumulation in the networked sphere. Data extraction and analysis are the two primary lenses of the article. The author further explores the Varian’s assertions of the four uses, which stem from the computer-mediated transactions, the data extractions, and analysis of the new contractual forms to better monitoring.
As an assessment of the nature and results of these utilizations, the article reveals insight into the understood rationale of private reconnaissance enterprise and the worldwide engineering of PC intercession, at which point it depends. This design creates a circulated and, to a great extent, an uncontested new articulation of intensity that I dedicate: ‘Enormous Other.’ It is established by startling and regularly messy components of extraction, commodification, and control that adequately oust people from their own conduct while delivering new business sectors of social forecast and change. Observation private enterprise challenges law-based standards and withdraws in fundamental manners from the very long term advancement of market free enterprise.
Zuboff. (2019, August 21). The threat of surveillance capitalism and the fight for a human future. Retrieved from https://www.abc.net.au/religion/shoshana-zuboff-threat-of-surveillance-capitalism/11433716
The second article used for the annotated bibliography is titled the threat surveillance capitalism and the fight for the human future. This was authored by Shoshana Zuboff and published in 019 has focused on the secrets of new capitalism and how they can make staggering wealth such as Google and how we can safeguard ourselves for these invasive powers. Further insights regarding how capitalism has been hijacked by the surveillance are discussed in the article.
The author offers insights on that Most Americans understand that there are two gatherings of checked routinely as they move about the nation. The primary crowd is observed automatically by a court request necessitating that a GPS beacon is joined to their lower leg. The next gathering incorporates every other person. The author opens our eyes to the lots of people being monetizing data today as one provides free information to companies like Google, they will sell the data. Private enterprise has been commandeered by a worthwhile observation venture that undercuts the “typical” developmental systems related with its chronicled achievement and debases the solidarity of gracefully and requests that has for quite a long time, anyway defectively, fastened free enterprise to the veritable needs of its populaces and social orders, hence empowering the productive extension of market majority rule government.
Sevignan. (2013, December 6). (PDF) The commodification of privacy on the Internet. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/275309072_The_commodification_of_privacy_on_the_Internet
The third article considered for the assignment is tilted commodification of privacy on the Internet, authored by Sebastian Sevignani and published in 2013. From a political economy viewpoint on an open arrangement, this paper investigates the commodification of security on the Internet as a pragmatic financial and a desultory cycle. On the one hand, predominant online plans of action struggle basically with clients’ requirement for protection, and the users themselves take a shot at their weakness in such manner (“(PDF) The commodification of privacy on the internet,” 2013). Then again, there is a private talk that is possessive individualistic; however, comprehensively advises the public policy process.
The author has insightfully demonstrated in this paper, and there is a problematic connection between protection as standard freedom and privacy as an item in entrepreneur market societies. From this understanding, it very well may be gotten that, although useful in progressing political discussions, the conceptualization of security as a common right or freedom probably won’t be sufficient to break with the ware rationale. Interestingly, are thinking of security should focus on a more social conception of protection. I believe such a social origination will become more possible and helpful the more non-market circles on the Internet and society develop, but certain viewpoints would already be named.
Lyon, D. (2019). Surveillance capitalism, surveillance culture, and data politics 1. Data Politics, 64-77. doi:10.4324/9781315167305-4
The fourth article considered for the annotated bibliography is titled surveillance capitalism, surveillance culture, and data politics, authored by David Lyon and published in 2017. The author focused mainly on the escalation of the levels of data dependency. He demonstrates surveillance as the main characteristic of interactions between governments and enterprises, businesses, and all organizations. It remains an aspect of everyday life.
The article offers insights regarding why surveillance is emerging as a critical aspect of our everyday life, as witnessed in mundane imageries and practices like complacent data donation social rankings.However, the author insightfully demonstrates that these trends do not reflect innocent cultural developments and practices as they echo and embody an emerging political action stage, which is termed as surveillance capitalism.
Zuboff. (2019, April 18). The age of surveillance capitalism | Diggit magazine. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/332495602_The_age_of_surveillance_capitalism_Diggit_Magazine
The fifth and final article considered for the annotated bibliography is titled the age of surveillance capitalism, authored by Zuboff and focused on how Google and Facebook provide a new form of capitalism as the humans utilizing such platforms are the staff which the surveillance capitalists scrap their raw materials. The surveillance capitalisms use the human experiences as the raw materials for translations into behavioral data. The article demonstrates that the extraction imperative is driven b he mere desires of making profits.
The article offers critical insights in demonstrating that behavioral capitalism is attempting to acquire data at the lowest possible cost and turn it into profits. One of the economic principals of surveillance capitalism is offered which is extraction imperative which necessitates the economies of scale… productivity is as good as the amount of data gathered, the available computing capacities and sophistication in the machine learning mechanisms. The economies of scope rests on the axiom that the behavioral surplus ought not only to be vast but also varied in their depths.
References
Big other: Surveillance capitalism and the prospects of an information civilization – Article – Harvard business school. (n.d.). Retrieved from https://www.hbs.edu/faculty/Pages/item.aspx?num=49122
Sevignan. (2013, December 6). (PDF) The commodification of privacy on the Internet. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/275309072_The_commodification_of_privacy_on_the_Internet
Zuboff. (2019, August 21). The threat of surveillance capitalism and the fight for a human future. Retrieved from https://www.abc.net.au/religion/shoshana-zuboff-threat-of-surveillance-capitalism/11433716
Lyon, D. (2019). Surveillance capitalism, surveillance culture, and data politics 1. Data Politics, 64-77. doi:10.4324/9781315167305-4