Uncategorized
anp635wk1assignment
ifferent cultural groups have unique beliefs and attitudes about health promotion and spirituality. It is important for a nurse practitioner to understand and adapt to those cultural and spiritual beliefs when educating patients.
Write a 750-1,000 word essay defining the AGACNP role of assessing the health and wellness of a specific patient population. Your essay should include three to five peer-reviewed sources.
A patient population can be a group of patients with the same chronic disease, same ethnicity, from the same community, or any other defined specific group.
Your essay should cover the following:
- Establish how the specific patient population views chronic diseases and the maintenance of wellness.
- Explain the cultural factors that may affect the attitudes of patients and families towards health promotion and maintenance.
- Evaluate how your own personal worldview influences your attitudes and beliefs towards health maintenance of this patient population.
- Evaluate how cultural bias may result in very different health-related preferences and perceptions.
You are required to cite three to five sources to complete this assignment. Sources must be published within the last 5 years and appropriate for the assignment criteria and nursing content.
Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.
This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.
Rubic_Print_
Format
| Course Code | Class Code | Assignment Title | Total Points | |||||||
| ANP-635 | ANP-635-XO0502XB | Spirituality in Health Care | 115.0 | |||||||
| Criteria | Percentage | Unsatisfactory (0.00%) | Less than Satisfactory (74.00%) | Satisfactory (79.00%) | Good (87.00%) | Excellent (100.00%) | Comments | Points Earned | ||
| Content | 70.0% | |||||||||
| Different Cultural Definitions of Health | 1 | 7.0% | A discussion of definition of health as it is defined by different cultures is not included. | A discussion of definition of health as it is defined by different cultures is present, but it lacks detail or is incomplete. | A discussion of definition of health as it is defined by different cultures is present. | A discussion of the definition of health as it is defined by different cultures is clearly provided and well developed. | A comprehensive discussion of the definition of health as it is defined by different cultures is thoroughly developed with supporting details. | |||
| Cultural Factors That Impact Attitudes of Patient and Families Towards Health Maintenance | An explanation of the cultural factors that may impact families and their attitudes towards health maintenance is not included. | An explanation of the cultural factors that may impact families and their attitudes towards health maintenance is present, but it lacks detail or is incomplete. | An explanation of the cultural factors that may impact families and their attitudes towards health maintenance is present. | An explanation of the cultural factors that may impact families and their attitudes towards health maintenance is clearly provided and well developed. | A comprehensive explanation of the cultural factors that may impact families and their attitudes towards health maintenance is thoroughly developed with supporting details. | |||||
| Personal Worldview And Its Influence on Attitudes and Beliefs About Health Maintenance | 16.0% | A reflection on personal worldview and its influence on attitudes and beliefs about health maintenance is not included. | A reflection on personal worldview and its influence on attitudes and beliefs about health maintenance is present, but it lacks detail or is incomplete. | A reflection on personal worldview and its influence on attitudes and beliefs about health maintenance is present. | A reflection on personal worldview and its influence on attitudes and beliefs about health maintenance is clearly provided and well developed. | A comprehensive reflection on personal worldview and its influence on attitudes and beliefs about health maintenance is thoroughly developed with supporting details. | ||||
| Influence of Cultural Biases on Health-Related Preferences and Perceptions | 1 | 5.0% | An explanation of cultural biases and their influence on health-related preferences and perceptions is not included. | An explanation of cultural biases and their influence on health-related preferences and perceptions is present, but it lacks detail or is incomplete. | An explanation of cultural biases and their influence on health-related preferences and perceptions is present. | An explanation of cultural biases and their influence on health-related preferences and perceptions is clearly provided and well developed. | A comprehensive explanation of cultural biases and their influence on health-related preferences and perceptions is thoroughly developed with supporting details. | |||
| Required Sources | Sources are not included. | Number of required sources is only partially met. | Number of required sources is met, but sources are outdated or inappropriate. | Number of required sources is met. Sources are current, but not all sources are appropriate for the assignment criteria and nursing content. | Number of required resources is met. Sources are current, and appropriate for the assignment criteria and nursing content. | |||||
| Organization and Effectiveness | 20.0% | |||||||||
| Thesis Development and Purpose | Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim. | Thesis is insufficiently developed or vague. Purpose is not clear. | Thesis is apparent and appropriate to purpose. | Thesis is clear and forecasts the development of the paper. Thesis is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose. | Thesis is comprehensive and contains the essence of the paper. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear. | |||||
| Argument Logic and Construction | 8.0% | Statement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. The conclusion does not support the claim made. Argument is incoherent and uses noncredible sources. | Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic. Some sources have questionable credibility. | Argument is orderly, but may have a few inconsistencies. The argument presents minimal justification of claims. Argument logically, but not thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sources used are credible. Introduction and conclusion bracket the thesis. | Argument shows logical progressions. Techniques of argumentation are evident. There is a smooth progression of claims from introduction to conclusion. Most sources are authoritative. | Clear and convincing argument that presents a persuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are authoritative. | ||||
| Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use) | Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction is used. | Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register) or word choice are present. Sentence structure is correct but not varied. | Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct and varied sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are employed. | Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. The writer uses a variety of effective sentence structures and figures of speech. | Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English. | |||||
| 10.0% | ||||||||||
| Paper Format (use of appropriate style for the major and assignment) | Template is not used appropriately or documentation format is rarely followed correctly. | Appropriate template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken. A lack of control with formatting is apparent. | Appropriate template is used. Formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present. | Appropriate template is fully used. There are virtually no errors in formatting style. | All format elements are correct. | |||||
| Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style) | Sources are not documented. | Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors. | Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present. | Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct. | Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error. | |||||
| Total Weightage | 100% |