Analysis For “Harriet Robinson, “Early Factory Labor In New England” “

Analysis for “Harriet Robinson, “Early Factory Labor in New England” “

2 pages Essay

double space

MLA

Primary Source Analysis #2

Harriet Robinson, “Early Factory Labor in New England”

 

In 1883, Harriet Robinson described her work in the textile mills between 1832 and 1845. A portion of her memoir was assigned for this week’s readings and excerpts from this document can be found below (following all of the questions). Write an analysis of her memoir based on these excerpts that responds to the following questions:

 

Part I:

1. What are two ways that the market revolution affected women’s lives in the United States?

2. In what ways did women’s lives improve during this time period? In what ways might their lives have become worse?

3. What can we learn from the memoir about workers’ rights – what experiences did Robinson have that promoted the organization of workers for better wages and working conditions?

4. The primary sources assigned for this week and discussed in class also included “An Account at Lowell.” Why might Robinson’s memoir be considered a more trustworthy source than “An Account of Lowell? What does Robinson’s memoir tell about the time period that “An Account of Lowell” does not?

5. Are there any limitations to using the memoir as a primary source for understanding the market revolution?

 

Part II: Discussion Question – please add this below your essay (not as part of it). You can put it on the same page as your essay, but in a separate section.

· Please pose one discussion question about this reading. What do you think is important to talk about with regard to this source? What is a question that you could ask to deepen your understanding by relating it to other readings, class themes, or issues in American history?

 

Responses will be graded according to the following criteria:

· Does the response address all the questions posed?

· Does the response demonstrate that the student has done a close and careful analysis?

· Does the response offer a thoughtful engagement with the source?

· Does the response demonstrate a concerted effort to think about the significance of the source and its relationship to course topics?

· Does the response make sense? Are the ideas within it clearly communicated?

· Is the response written in essay form, with a thesis, a set of paragraphs that each address a distinct argument in support of the thesis, and a conclusion

 

Excerpts from document:

…I shall confine myself to a description of factory life in Lowell, Massachusetts, from 1832 to 1845 …

In 1832, …Help was in great demand and stories were told all over the country of the new factory place, and the high wages that were offered [and] gave new life to lonely and dependent women in distant towns and farmhouses…Troops of young girls came from different parts of New England and from Canada…The early mill girls were of different ages. Some were not over ten years of age; a few were in middle life, but the majority were between the ages of sixteen and twenty-five.

The working hours … extended from five o’clock in the morning until seven in the evening, with one half hour each, for breakfast and dinner…Those of the mill girls who had homes generally worked from eight to ten months in the year; the rest of time was spent with parents or friends. A few taught school during the summer months. Their life in the factory was made pleasant to them. In those days there was no need of advocating the proper relationship between employer and employed. Help was too valuable to be ill-treated.

…To make a gentleman of a brother or a son, to give him a college education, was the dominant thought…I have known more than one to give every cent of her wages… to her brother, that he might get the education necessary to enter some profession. I have known a mother to work years in this way for her boy…There are many men now living who were helped to an education by the wages of the early mill girls…

… As late as 1840, there were only seven vocations outside the home into which the women of New England had entered. At this time, women had no property rights. A widow could be left without her share of her husband’s (or the family) property…A father could make his will without a reference to his daughter’s share of the inheritance…A woman was not supposed to be capable of spending her own, or of using other people’s money.

…One of the first strikes that ever took place in this country was in Lowell in 1836. When it was announced that the wages were to be cut…The mills were shut down and the girls went… and listened to incendiary speeches from some early labor reformers. One of the girls stood on a pump…declaring that it was their duty to resist all attempts at cutting down the wages. This was the first time a woman had spoken in public in Lowell, and the event caused surprise and consternation among her audience…

…the strike did no good. The corporations would not come to terms. The girls were soon tired of holding out, and they went back to their work at the reduced rate of wages.

 
 

Harriet Robinson, “Early Factory Labor in New England” 1883 Memoir

In her autobiography, Harriet Hanson Robinson, the wife of a newspaper editor, provided an account of her earlier life as female factory worker (from the age of ten in 1834 to 1848) in the textile Mills of Lowell, Massachusetts. Her account explains some of the family dynamics involved, and lets us see the women as active participants in their own lives – for instance in their strike of 1836.

In what follows, I shall confine myself to a description of factory life in Lowell, Massachusetts, from 1832 to 1848, since, with that phase of Early Factory Labor in New England, I am the most familiar-because I was a part of it.

In 1832, Lowell was little more than a factory village. Five “corporations” were started, and the cotton mills belonging to them were building. Help was in great demand and stories were told all over the country of the new factory place, and the high wages that were offered to all classes of workpeople; stories that reached the ears of mechanics’ and farmers’ sons and glave new life to lonely and dependent women in distant towns and farmhouses …. Troops of young girls came from different parts of New England, and from Canada, and men were employed to collect them at so much a head, and deliver them at the factories.

. . .

At the time the Lowell cotton mills were started the caste of the factory girl was the lowest among the employments of women. In England and in France, particularly, great injustice had been done to her real character. She was represented as subjected to influences that must destroy her purity and selfrespect. In the eyes of her overseer she was but a brute, a slave, to be beaten, pinched and pushed about. It was to overcome this prejudice that such high wages had been offered to women that they might be induced to become millgirls….

The early millgirls were of different ages. Some were not over ten years old; a few were in middle life, but the majority were between the ages of sixteen and twentyfive. The very young girls were called “doffers.” They “doffed,” or took off, the full bobbins from the spinningframes, and replaced them with empty ones. These mites worked about fifteen minutes every hour and the rest of the time was their own. When the overseer was kind they were allowed to read, knit, or go outside the millyard to play. They were paid two dollars a week. The working hours of all the girls extended from five o’clock in the morning until seven in the evening, with one halfhour each, for breakfast and dinner. Even the doffers were forced to be on duty nearly fourteen hours a day. This was the greatest hardship in the lives of these children. Several years later a tenhour law was passed, but not until long after some of these little doffers were old enough to appear before the legislative committee on the subject, and plead, by their presence, for a reduction of the hours of labor.

Those of the millgirls who had homes generally worked from eight to ten months in the year; the rest of the time was spent with parents or friends. A few taught school during the summer months. Their life in the factory was made pleasant to them. In those days there was no need of advocating the doctrine of the proper relation between employer and employed. Help was too valuable to be illtreated….

. . .

The most prevailing incentive to labor was to secure the means of education for some male member of the family. To make a gentleman of a brother or a son, to give him a college education, was the dominant thought in the minds of a great many of the better class of millgirls. I have known more than one to give every cent of her wages, month after month, to her brother, that he might get the education necessary to enter some profession. I have known a mother to work years in this way for her boy. I have known women to educate young men by their earnings, who were not sons or relatives. There are many men now living who were helped to an education by the wages of the early millgirls.

It is well to digress here a little, and speak of the influence the possession of money had on the characters of some of these women. We can hardly realize what a change the cotton factory made in the status of the working women. Hitherto woman had always been a money saving rather than a money earning, member of the community. Her labor could command but small return. If she worked out as servant, or “help,” her wages were from 50 cents to $1 .00 a week; or, if she went from house to house by the day to spin and weave, or do tailoress work, she could get but 75 cents a week and her meals. As teacher, her services were not in demand, and the arts, the professions, and even the trades and industries, were nearly all closed to her.

As late as 1840 there were only seven vocations outside the home into which the women of New England had entered. At this time woman had no property rights. A widow could be left without her share of her husband’s (or the family) property, an ” incumbrance” to his estate. A father could make his will without reference to his daughter’s share of the inheritance. He usually left her a home on the farm as long as she remained single. A woman was not sup posed to be capable of spending her own, or of using other people’s money. In Massachusetts, before 1840, a woman could not, legally, be treasurer of her own sewing society, unless some man were responsible for her. The law took no cognizance of woman as a moneyspender. She was a ward, an appendage, a relict. Thus it happened that if a woman did not choose to marry, or, when left a widow, to remarry, she had no choice but to enter one of the few employments open to her, or to become a burden on the charity of some relative.

. . .

One of the first strikes that ever took place in this country was in Lowell in 1836. When it was announced that the wages were to be cut down, great indignation was felt, and it was decided to strike or “turn out” en masse. This was done. The mills were shut down, and the girls went from their several corporations in procession to the grove on Chapel Hill, and listened to incendiary speeches from some early labor reformers.