Advertising 3000words
See attachments. I am in UK. Use examples from the here not US. Please. Thank you.
ADVERTISINGM30947
ASSESSMENT for 2020/2021
Case study: Baileys: A radical brand turnaround story with extra
Sprinkles.
Katie Mackay-Sinclair, Jack Farrelly and John Thomson
Institute of Practitioners in Advertising, Silver, IPA Effectiveness
Awards, 2018 WARC
Total 3,000 words. All work to be presented in size 12 font and referenced using
APA. The use of sub-headings to structure work is encouraged.
The marking of each question is equally weighted.
Read the case study and answer ALL 3 questions.
Question 1: Using your understanding of two theories of advertising, use the
Bailey’s case study to critically discuss/examine the validity of these theories on how
advertising works. (1,000 words)
Question 2: When planning media, several key factors need to be considered to be
effective. Critically discuss two of these key factors using the case study to support
your discussion. (1,000 words)
Question 3: The Baileys case study is focused on the UK. Critically discuss the
considerations that would need to be made if the company decided to use this
campaign or develop a similar campaign for Malaysia. Your answer should include a
discussion of any ethical issues that may need to be considered. (1,000 words)
DEADLINE FOR SUBMISSION: FRIDAY 22nd JANUARY 2021 at 11:55pm
ADVERTISING: Assessment Marking criteria 2020/2021
Excellent work Very good work Solid, reasonable work Work meets requirements Work fails to meet basic
requirements
Required elements of
Advertising assessment
70+
60-69
50-59
40-49
<40
Marks
Evaluation of key
academic concepts
30%
Outstanding work – contains
accurate, relevant material,
demonstrates understanding of
complex subject matter and is
able to view it in a wider context.
Shows originality and confidence
in analysing and criticising
assumptions, is aware of the
limits
of
knowledge.
Very good work – contains most of
the information required, is accurate
and relevant and demonstrates
understanding of the subject matter
and attempts to view it in a wider
context.
Shows some originality of thought
with good critique and analysis of
assumptions, is aware of the limits
of knowledge.
Work that attempts to address
the topic with some
understanding and analysis of
key aspects of the subject
matter covered.
Attempts to show some
originality of thought and
analysis of assumptions. Some
awareness of the limits of
knowledge.
Adequate work which attempts to
address the topic with limited
understanding and analysis.
Shows limited originality of thought and
limited awareness of the limits of
knowledge.
Work in this range attempts to
address the question / problem
but is substantially incomplete
and deficient.
Shows no originality of thought
and no awareness of the limits
of knowledge.
Evidence of research to
support discussion.
30%
Evidence of extensive research
from both academic and
practitioner
sources.
Excellent use of research to
support
analysis of case
study.
Well researched and demonstrates
wider reading from both academic
and practitioner sources.
Very good use of research to
support analysis of
case study.
Research extends to primary
sources. Some evidence of
wider research.
Good use of research to support
analysis of case study.
Some research using texts, Internet
and key reference sources.
Adequate use of research to support
analysis of case study.
No adequate attempt to use
sources.
No adequate use of research
to support analysis of case
study.
Analysis and application
of case study.
30%
Excellent, insightful critical
analysis of how academic
concepts can be applied to the
case study.
Clear, concise and relevant use
of examples from the case study.
Very good insightful critical analysis
of how
academic concepts can be
applied to the case study, but lacks
the additional insight needed for
70+.
Clear, concise and relevant use of
examples from the study
Solid, with some insight into how
academic concepts can be
applied to the case study,
Not always clear or relevant use
of examples from case study.
Basic consideration of how academic
concepts can be applied to the case
study. Lacking insight or analysis,
mostly descriptive.
Some relevance, lacking clarity.
Limited attempt to underpin with
relevant examples form the case
study.
Limited consideration of how
how academic concepts can
be applied to the case study.
Inadequate discussion, lacks
clarity and relevance.
Inadequate attempt to
underpin with relevant
examples form the case study.
Structure and presentation
of report
10%
Excellent in terms of
organisation, structure, use and
flow of language, grammar,
spelling, format and
presentation.
Excellent presentation of
references.
Very good in terms of organisation,
structure, use and flow of language.
Very good presentation of
references.
Satisfactory presentation with
respect to presentation,
organisation, language,
Grammar and
spelling.
Good presentation of
references.
An attempt to follow directions
regarding organisation, structure, use
and flow of language, grammar and
spelling.
Sound presentation of references.
Serious problems
with a number of aspects of
language use
are often found in work in this
range.
Inadequate presentation of
references.
Assessment
Tips
Dr Sarah Turnbull
What is the assignment?
Case study – Baileys
3 questions (equal marks)which relate to advertising
module
Advertising theory
Media planning
International advertising (including ethical issues)
Evidence of knowledge of:
Module learning
Ability to apply the case study (understanding of what you
have learnt)
Evidence of wider reading (research)
Read the Marking Criteria
Provided with the assignment brief on the Moodle
site
Read this marking criteria before you start and
ensure you understand where marks will be
awarded
Ensure that you address each aspect of the criteria
in your response
Self-evaluate where you think your work sits
within the marking criteria – MARK IT YOURSELF
Excellent work Very good work Solid, reasonable work Work meets requirements Work fails to meet basic
requirements
Required elements of
Advertising assessment
70+
60-69
50-59
40-49
<40
Marks
Evaluation of key academic
concepts
30%
Outstanding work – contains
accurate, relevant material,
demonstrates understanding of
complex subject matter and is able to
view it in a wider context.
Shows originality and confidence in
analysing and criticising assumptions,
is aware of the limits of
knowledge.
Very good work – contains most of the
information required, is accurate and
relevant and demonstrates
understanding of the subject matter and
attempts to view it in a wider context.
Shows some originality of thought with
good critique and analysis of
assumptions, is aware of the limits of
knowledge.
Work that attempts to address the
topic with some understanding and
analysis of key aspects of the subject
matter covered.
Attempts to show some originality of
thought and analysis of assumptions.
Some awareness of the limits of
knowledge.
Adequate work which attempts to address
the topic with limited understanding and
analysis.
Shows limited originality of thought and limited
awareness of the limits of knowledge.
Work in this range attempts to
address the question / problem but is
substantially incomplete and
deficient.
Shows no originality of thought and
no awareness of the limits of
knowledge.
Evidence of research to
support discussion.
30%
Evidence of extensive research from
both academic and practitioner
sources.
Excellent use of research to support
analysis of case study.
Well researched and demonstrates wider
reading from both academic and
practitioner sources.
Very good use of research to support
analysis of case study.
Research extends to primary sources.
Some evidence of wider research.
Good use of research to support
analysis of case study.
Some research using texts, Internet and key
reference sources.
Adequate use of research to support
analysis of case study.
No adequate attempt to use
sources.
No adequate use of research to
support analysis of case study.
Analysis and application of
case study.
30%
Excellent, insightful critical analysis of
how academic concepts can be
applied to the case study.
Clear, concise and relevant use of
examples from the case study.
Very good insightful critical analysis of
how
academic concepts can be applied to
the case study, but lacks the additional
insight needed for 70+.
Clear, concise and relevant use of
examples from the study
Solid, with some insight into how
academic concepts can be applied to
the case study,
Not always clear or relevant use of
examples from case study.
Basic consideration of how academic
concepts can be applied to the case study.
Lacking insight or analysis, mostly
descriptive.
Some relevance, lacking clarity.
Limited attempt to underpin with relevant
examples
form the case study.
Limited consideration of how
how academic concepts can be
applied to the case study.
Inadequate discussion, lacks clarity
and relevance. Inadequate attempt
to underpin with relevant examples
form the case study.
Structure and presentation of
report
10%
Excellent in terms of organisation,
structure, use and flow of
language,
grammar, spelling, format and
presentation.
Excellent presentation of
references.
Very good in terms of organisation,
structure, use and flow of language.
Very good presentation of references.
Satisfactory presentation with respect
to presentation, organisation,
language,
Grammar and spelling.
Good presentation of references.
An attempt to follow directions regarding
organisation, structure, use and flow of
language, grammar and spelling.
Sound presentation of references.
Serious problems
with a number of aspects of
language use
are often found in work in this
range.
Inadequate presentation of
references.
Read the 3 questions
Read the assignment questions several times – before
you read the case study
Ensure you understand what each question is asking
Consider what is required within each question and
make a plan for the structure you are going to use for
each
Consider what you have learnt on the module
Note: ALL online learning material is available for the
rest of the module – so you have everything you need
to get started
Question 1:
Question 1: Using your understanding of two
theories of advertising, use the Bailey’s case study
to critically discuss/examine the validity of these
theories on how advertising works. (1,000 words)
Strong Theory
Weak Theory
Elaboration Likelihood Model
AIDA
Hierarchy of Effects
Information Processing
Other models from Chapter 6: inf luencer model/value models etc
Question 2:
Question 2: When planning media, several key factors
need to be considered to be effective. Critically
discuss two of these key factors using the case study to
support your discussion. (1,000 words)
Lots of factors: see weeks 9-11 and Chapters 20-22
Challenge will be choosing 2 factors –
Two approaches: Either consider 2 themes that you can
bundle lots of factors within OR outline all the factors and
then narrow in and discuss 2 of your choice in depth. You
must choose the 2 you consider key and argue this in your
response.
Question 3:
Question 3: The Baileys case study is focused on the UK. Critically
discuss the considerations that would need to be made if the company
decided to use this campaign or develop a similar campaign for
Malaysia. Your answer should include a discussion of any ethical issues
that may need to be considered. (1,000 words)
Lots of considerations to discuss: re-visit Week 8 and Hollensen (2019)chapter
17 and 7 (culture)
Ensure you support your discussion with evidence (a reference evidencing
wider reading undertaken)
Use headings to structure your response
Structure
Consider using sub-headings – helps to keep you on
track and balance the response
Introduction – short and sets the tone and direction of
your response. Do not need to introduce the case study.
‘Middle’ – signpost each section and balance between
topics
Conclusion – provide a short distinctive end to your
response.
Referencing
Reference – APA 7
“Reference List” not a bibliography (at end of each
question)
Don’t need to provide practitioner references if you
can’t find
Avoid “random google references” – consider the
credibility of the sources
Finding sources of evidence to support “Excellent use
of research”. Consult library sheep on Moodle and if
you have problems contact the library (see sheet for
details)
Good Luck
Deadline: Friday 22nd January 2021 at 11:55
OPPORTUNITIES FOR FORMATIVE FEEDBACK
Feedback sessions in seminar times in January for Q2
and Q3 structures
Friday seminar sessions – Q&A opportunities
Katie Mackay-Sinclair, Jack Farrelly and John Thomson
Source: Institute of Practitioners in Advertising, Silver, IPA Effectiveness
Awards, 2018
Downloaded from WARC
Baileys: A radical brand turnaround story with extra
sprinkles
Baileys, a brand of cream liqueur, repositioned itself into the world of ‘real adult treats’ and reversed
downwards trending sales.
While Baileys was a much-loved brand in the UK, this did not translate into sales as from 2010
Baileys volume sales were declining at an average rate of eight per cent per year.
Baileys’ research indicated that cream liqueurs were consumed in smaller quantities and less
frequently so Baileys’ campaign featured diverse ways of consuming Baileys whether as a drink
by itself, combined with other drinks or as a dessert.
Baileys reinvested into cost effective formats allowing it to reach more women more often than
ever before across TV, media partnerships, sponsorship and digital.
Since launching its campaign average annual growth stands at 11%.
Campaign details
Brand: Baileys
Advertiser: Diageo
Agency: Mother; Carat
Introduction
This is a story about the one of the world’s most-loved spirits brands, Baileys, and its transformation from dusty
liqueur to delicious treat.
It’s the tale of Baileys fortunes in GB – a market central to the brand’s growth, the biggest market in Europe for
Baileys, and the second biggest market globally. In GB Baileys represents 12% of profits1 (the third biggest
brand in GB behind Guinness and Smirnoff).
This case demonstrates how having nothing to lose can inspire radical reframing of the brand, media and
creative strategy to trigger consumption and deliver a profit ROI 1.3 times than the pre-campaign average and
2.6 times the Spirits category average across Europe.2 This delivered a 54% increase in average annual net
profit generated for the business.3
Background: the Irish cream conundrum
In Britain, over 10.1 million people say they love Baileys making it the most-loved spirits brand amongst women,
and second most-loved amongst all adults (Figures 1 and 2).4
Figure 1: Brand love amongst females
Source: Millward Brown
Figure 2: Brand love amongst all adults
Source: Millward Brown
But the central paradox for many loved brands is love doesn’t necessarily translate into sales. Since 2010
Baileys volume sales were declining at an average rate of 8% per year (Figure 3).5
Figure 3: Bailey total off-trade volume sales (MAT)
Source: Nielsen Off-trade
With brand love not translating into volume sales, our plight was compounded by the fact that cream liqueurs
offer fewer occasions to drink than other spirits brands.6 A picture brought to life through comparison to the rest
of the Diageo portfolio (Figure 4).
Figure 4: Spirits that are suitable for most drinking occasions
Source: Millward Brown
When people do drink liqueurs, they do so in smaller volumes too (Figure 5).
Figure 5: Percentage of serves drunk across all occasions
Source: Millward Brown
To put the scale of the task into context, delivering the same volume growth as a brand like Smirnoff would
require three times as many drinkers.7
Unsurprisingly, internal belief in the future of Baileys had hit rock bottom. Price had become the only lever to
drive sales,8 and with reduced investment in the brand projected for at least the next two years, the perception
was that Baileys’ time had passed.
One senior executive said ‘Baileys is like an anchor, holding Diageo back’. Without a radical reversal of fortunes,
Baileys future was bleak.
In October 2015 a decision was made that a change of strategy was required.
A bold new set of objectives
Against this bleak context, a bold set of objectives were agreed to reverse the decline and return the brand to
growth. We needed a platform that would save the brand in the short term, as well as establish a bright long-
term future for Baileys.
Drive renewed internal belief in the Baileys brand at Diageo
Diageo was getting ready to pull the plug on investment in Baileys and redistribute it across the portfolio, where
growth could be realised. Reinvigorating the belief in Baileys from senior internal stakeholders would be critical.
Increase versatility of the Baileys liquid
For our audience of ‘modern women’ (women 18+, of which there are 26 million in the UK) Baileys was seen as
a one-trick pony: it was to be poured over ice, probably around Christmas time.9
This was painfully restricting the number of consumption occasions it was possible for the brand to enter.
Turn latent love into consumption and reverse the decline in volume sales
Baileys’ volume sales had been declining year-on-year and confidence in the brand’s ability to turn this around
was all but eroded. Our focus in this paper is off-trade sales, as these account for 90% of all Baileys sales
volume and are most indicative of performance.10
Do it as efficiently as possible and deliver a benchmark-beating ROI
As a lower priority brand in the portfolio, it was important we were able to prove a return. We set ourselves the
huge challenge of beating the top ROIs tracked by Diageo in spirits.
Demonstrate true effectiveness by delivering a profit for Diageo
Efficiency would be great, but proof that Baileys hadn’t had its day would only come if we delivered an
incremental profit for Diageo – and did so in the context of investment reduction.
From nadir to radical reframe: a new strategic agenda
When you find yourself at such a low, the aggregation of marginal gains just won’t cut it. With nothing to lose we
faced some brutal truths about our category, strategy and creative approach which led to three radical reframes.
Radical reframe 1: from the cream liqueur category, to the world of ‘real treats’.
As a category, cream liqueurs was dormant and dusty. Rather than try to change the rules of this category, we
decided to change the category we played in.
Radical reframe 2: from one-off festive blockbuster to millions of triggers to treat.
We recognised the disinvestment in the brand, and scale of the task, in a media approach that would allow
Baileys to reach millions when it mattered most.
Radical reframe 3: from lofty purpose to product indulgence.
And finally, rather than expect we could win in treating through continuing the lofty purpose communications of
old, we focused on our product truth.
Reimagining Baileys as a ‘Real adult treat’
Embracing the indulgent truth at the heart of our liquid gave us a launchpad out of the dormant liqueurs category
(there hasn’t been a single liqueur category entrant to the IPA effectiveness awards since 199211) and into the
world of ‘real adult treats’ – a category that, unlike cream liqueurs offered strong growth potential (Figure 6).
Figure 6: The growing ‘real adult treat’ category
And in an age where food and drink had become a source of entertainment, stepping into the ‘real adult treat’
space gave us the opportunity to place our brand and product at the centre of a cultural phenomenon modern
women were very much part of (Figure 7).
Figure 7: The vibrant world of food and drink entertainment
To better understand the adult treating category, we undertook global behavioural ethnographic research into
why and how our target of modern women indulge. This helped us identify key differences between humdrum
everyday treats and the real adult treat space we sought to play within (Figure 8).
Figure 8: We identified what it means to be a ‘real adult treat’
Source: The Behavioural Architects
Behavioural insight was overlaid with semiotic analysis of the treating space, pulling apart the tensions that
characterise the category, and reviewing the opportunities these tensions create.
Seen through the lens of our behavioural insight, we then isolated the semiotic heartland that best aligned with
the ‘real treat’ opportunity for Baileys; a space that drives desire through an invitation to reimagine – just what
our radical reframe from cream liqueur to real treat needed.
We got a clear sense of what this would mean for our approach, as mess, colour and playfulness are crucial
ingredients when executing in this space – they represent true, liberated enjoyment and indulgence (Figure 9).
Figure 9: Mess, colour and playfulness were identified as key qualities
Source: Flamingo Semiotics
Finally, we overlaid our understanding onto the Diageo Demand Space framework to isolate the largest
opportunities for the brand.
Our main priority was ‘indulgent relax at home’, estimated to be the largest occasion in GB12 (around 13% of all
drinks) with real headroom for the brand to grow share and alignment with the new ‘real treat’ positioning.
These learnings helped to unlock our new strategic approach, informing our brand, media and creative outputs.
A new positioning – Baileys as co-conspirator
Previously Baileys’ purpose had championed spirited women, but our new perspective on the brand demanded a
total overhaul. Women don’t need to be told what’s delicious, when it’s OK to treat themselves to something
indulgent, or that they’ve ‘earned it’: they already know. They enjoy what they enjoy no permission or apology
required. Baileys should be their ally in spontaneous, impulsive treating.
We had to move from empowering women to conspiring with them.
Figure 10: Unlike previous Baileys campaigns which focused upon empowering our female target
A new media approach: millions of triggers to treat
We had reframed our brand as co-conspirator and our delicious liquid as a real treat. The role for
communications would be to trigger this impulse and demonstrate versatility amongst modern women. A group
who draw their inspiration from recipes videos they view as a form of entertainment.
A new marketing model was developed to drive millions of simple compelling triggers to consumption.
We banned the blockbuster
By banning the blockbuster of old, budget was freed up and reinvested into cost-effective formats (after all a 10-
second and 20-second TVCs cost a lot less than a 60-second blockbuster), allowing Baileys to reach more
women more often than ever before across TV, media partnerships, sponsorship and digital (Figure 11).
Figure 11: Indexed cost of TV formats
Source: Carat
We got rigorous with targeting
Each channel was carefully planned to ensure that it reached our audience in the must-win purchase and
consumption occasions associated with the two demand spaces ‘indulgent relax at home’ and ‘planned meal out’.
Hundreds of occasions were mapped, the below chart shows a selection of these (Table 1).
Table 1: Three key moments for ‘indulge and relax at home’
We got close to the tastemakers
We invited some of the leading voices in food and drink culture to co-create a series of thoroughly modern
recipes with our liquid; recipes that when shared across their social platforms would tempt viewers to try Baileys
in a new and delicious way.
Liberated from the narrowcast constraints of Christmas blockbuster advertising, we were able to reach more
people more often, across more occasions than ever before, triggering when it mattered most.
A new creative idea
As already established, the reason people love Baileys was not because of its philosophies on emancipated
pleasure-seeking but because of its delicious liquid. Our creative idea needed to use this truth to trigger
consumption.
In a world where endlines are too often used as three-word philosophies rather than tools of business effect, we
went looking for a line that would act as a long-term trigger of consumption, an unlocker of latent love and one
that we could imagine women saying to themselves and their friends when they chose a Baileys.
‘Don’t mind if I Baileys’ was born.
Figure 12: ‘Don’t mind if I Baileys’
From theory to theatrics: the first iteration of ‘Don’t mind if I Baileys’
The first iteration of the campaign was all about putting the indulgent liquid at the centre of key treating
occasions across TV, partnerships, recipe content and programmatic display.
Four short-form TVCs sought to drive versatility and ‘real treat’ by highlighting the brunch, at home on the sofa,
sweet finish after a meal and Christmas occasions. Each reached women at home on the sofa when they were
ready to Indulge and relax, this was complemented with digital targeted at must-win moments (Figure 13–17).
Figure 13: ‘Safa’ TVC
Figure 14: ‘Brunch’ TVC
Figure 15: ‘Presents’ TVC
Figure 16: ‘Pear’ TVC
Figure 17: An example narrative in detail: ‘Pear’ TVC
Recipe videos were created in collaboration with treating trendsetters like ‘Molly Bakes’ and coffee connoisseurs
like ‘The Grind’ and amplified these across social media (Figures 18 and 19).
Figure 18: ‘Molly Bakes’ recipe content
Figure 19: ‘The Grind’ recipe content
Programmatic display and mobile were used to playfully deliver serves to audiences at the times and in the
places they would be most likely to treat. Whether browsing for dinner party recipes or entering a supermarket,
hundreds of moments were mapped and relevant creative messaging served to each (Figure 20).
Figure 20: Programmatic display
We partnered with Proper Tasty to reach women with culturally and seasonally relevant serve content. The
videos were viewed a total of 19 million times (Figure 21).13
Figure 21: Proper Tasty partnership
We started to see significant momentum.
We had created 325 million triggers to treat (defined as total cross-media impressions), reaching 93% of women
in GB an average of 13 times. That’s almost twice as many as the previous campaign14.
But there remained much to be improved upon as we looked to year two.
Evolving the campaign: finding the sweet-spot
Our comms weren’t working hard enough to deliver on our strategic intent.
For a creative approach intended to break out of the liqueur category and trigger the treating impulse, metrics so
close to norms on ‘is a real treat’ and ‘is a delicious drink’ weren’t ideal – not least because these were spirits
category norms (Figures 22 and 23).
Figure 22: ‘Is a real treat’
Source: Millward Brown Ad Diagnostics 2016
Figure 23: ‘Is a delicious drink’
Source: Millward Brown Ad Diagnostics 2016
We’d also learned a lot from a media and deployment perspective.
Investment was increased into channels that helped provide a consistent presence across the year, namely
media partnerships and sponsorships, allowing Baileys to maintain a front-of-mind presence across as many
weeks as possible with inspirational triggers that dialled up our ‘real treat’ and ‘delicious drink’ messaging (Figure
24).
Figure 24: Sponsorship and partnership as a percentage of media spend
Source: Carat 2016
The second iteration of ‘Don’t mind if I Baileys’: the cherry on top
Taking on board what we’d learned, year two of the campaign was about maximising the deliciousness of our
millions of triggers.
Three TVCs focused on playfully ingenious serves, that crucially, would be easy for our audience to actually
make. And this time, we truly embraced the lick-the-screen-delicious world of treating; our indulgent serves took
centre stage (Figures 25–27).
Figure 25: ‘Cancelled plans’ TVC
Figure 26: ‘Drink it too’ TVC
Figure 27: An example narrative in detail: ‘Antlers’ TVC
We also created sponsorship idents for Made in Chelsea (MIC). Not only do Baileys and MIC have a great deal
in common (they’re both unapologetic, charming, witty and very indulgent) the slot time afforded us the
opportunity to present our audience with a myriad of playful and imaginative triggers to treat within the “indulgent
relax at home” moment (Figure 28).
Figure 28: Some example MIC idents in detail
But TV was just one part of a much wider ecosystem of triggers.
More recipe videos were created to be deployed in social channels. Their objective was to drive lick the screen
deliciousness, and playfully prompt our audience to reimagine the number of ways it’s possible to drink Baileys
(Figures 29 and 30).
Figure 29: Some example recipe videos – ‘Hot chocolate challenge’
Figure 30: Some example recipe videos – ‘Flat white martini’
Programmatic was used to present delicious serves to people at the times and in the places they would be most
likely to act – achieving a click-through rate almost three times the industry average. Our serves (not the
occasion) took centre-stage to maximise lick-the-screen deliciousness and drive desire to have a Baileys when
you feel like an adult treat (Figure 31).
Figure 31: Programmtic
We also partnered with foodie blog and recipe hub TasteMade, which enabled us to create even more videos
than before. We chalked up 69 million views15 at one point our ‘French toast’ video became the second most
viewed video on Facebook globally (Figure 32) 16
Figure 32: Tastemade Baileys French toast recipe
The ghost brownies recipe video even made its way to LA, with Kim Kardashian loving one of our recipes
(Figure 33).
Figure 33: Tastemade Baileys ghost brownies recipe
Recipe content was shoppable too, through a partnership with Adimo, encouraging viewers to give into
temptation and order the whole recipe there and then (Figure 34).
Figure 34: ‘Shoppable’ recipe content
Our real treat proposition was brought to life through activation at Christmas markets and the Baileys Treat
Stop, where we saw queues around the block for Baileys-inspired treats (Figures 35 and 36).
Figure 35: Baileys at Christmas markets
Figure 36: Baileys Treat Stop in Covent Garden
Through sponsorship and partnerships we created even more triggers (defined as impressions) in the second
iteration of the campaign 376 million of them in total.
The performance of assets in the second iteration of ‘Don’t mind if I
Baileys’
Significant progress had been made. Across all of the Optimisers Millward Brown carried out for Diageo across
Europe in 2016 (36 ads in total) – ‘Antlers’ was the best performing.17
Reviewing our performance before the campaign, and through the two years of content so far, we could see
year-on-year improvement. From failing to reach norms as the work moved to the new strategy we beat them
almost universally in 2017 as we cracked the code of the treats category.
In short, our scores went from a sea of amber to a sea of bright green (Figure 37).
Figure 37: Millward Brown Optimiser scores
Source: 2017 Millward Brown Optimiser
Revisiting our objectives
We didn’t just meet our objectives but proved Baileys has a bright future in both the short and long term. It’s no
wonder confidence in the brand has returned.
Did we drive renewed internal belief in the Baileys brand at Diageo?
Baileys is now seen as brand that proves that marketing works (Figure 38).
Figure 38: Client comment
The ‘Don’t mind if I Baileys’ campaign was called out in the ‘category review’ section of the Diageo 2017 Annual
Report; it was the only advertising campaign mentioned (Figure 39).
Figure 39: Diageo 2017 Annual Report
The campaign’s simplicity and power was also lauded by senior executives outside the marketing team (Figure
40).
Figure 40: Client comment
Support for the campaign has gone right to the very top of the organisation (Figure 41).
Figure 41: Client comment
While this paper focuses upon GB, belief within the Diageo organisation is now so strong that investment in
Baileys marketing is being increased around the world.18
Did we increase versatility of the Baileys liquid?
Since the campaign Baileys is not just perceived as – but also consumed as – a far more versatile liquid.19
Ad diagnostic analysis from a Millward Brown Optimiser study shows our creative worked particularly hard at
driving versatility and deliciousness.
Our lead creative for example, ‘Antlers’, performed significantly above Diageo spirit norms on both ‘Can be
enjoyed in many different ways’ and ‘Is a delicious treat’ (Figures 42 and 43).
Figure 42: ‘Can be enjoyed in many different ways’
Source: Millward Brown Ad Diagnostics
Figure 43: ‘Is a delicious treat’
Source: Millward Brown Ad Diagnostics
This was echoed in a perceptual shift picked up in the broader brand tracking, with the number of people saying
‘Baileys can be enjoyed in many different ways’ increasing by 12% (Figure 44).
Figure 44: Versatility perceptions among females 25-34
Source: Millward Brown Brand Tracking
But this was about much more than just perception.
Past 4 week consumption data shows the average ways Baileys drinkers are actually consuming Baileys is on
the rise:
Three times as many people reported drinking Baileys in an iced coffee;20
Twice as many people reported drinking Baileys in a flat white martini;21
Twice as many people reported drinking Baileys in any other kind of cocktail22
In fact, overall the average number of ways people drunk Baileys increased by 30% (Figure 45).23
Figure 45: Overall average ways of drinking
Source: Millward Brown
It’s clear that once people saw that Baileys could be consumed in many different indulgent ways, their own
consumption behaviour followed suit. And now Baileys was beginning to be seen as a ‘real adult treat’ rather
than a dusty cream liqueur, the Baileys brand and liquid began to appear in culture too. (Figure 46)
Figure 46
Of course, there was always the risk that such a radical reframe could damage the strength of the Baileys brand.
It didn’t. Baileys ‘meaningfulness score’ (a combination of taste, quality and brand love scores) wasn’t diminished
either by entering the treat category of by moving away from the previous position of championing women
(Figure 47).
Figure 47: Baileys ‘meaningful’ score
Source: Millward Brown brand tracking 2017
Did we turn latent love into consumption and reverse the decline in volume sales?
Before ‘Don’t mind if I Baileys’ volume sales had been declining steadily for five years. Since the launch of the
new campaign, Baileys sales have been turned around.
In the four years leading up to the new strategy, Baileys volume sales had been declining at an average rate of
8% per year. Since launch, average annual growth stands at 11%.
Figure 48: Baileys total off-trade volume sales (MAT)
Source: Nielsen ‘total coverage’ off-trade data
Figure 49 shows that the volume growth picks up in line with the implementation of the new strategy.
Figure 49: Baileys total off-trade volume sales (MAT)
Source: Nielsen “total coverage” off trade data
Did we deliver a profitable return on investment for Baileys?
This wasn’t just about turning the Baileys brand around; we had to do it in the most efficient and effective way
possible. A strong ROI was not just about proving our work worked, but also showing how effective and efficient
marketing spend – both working and not working – could be.
The impact of the campaign on sales and profit was calculated using a set of econometric models developed by
Data2Decisions. These models show that the total profit return on media spend was 2.10 (110%), adding in
production costs and fees the profit return on total marketing investment was 1.54 (54%).
The new campaign didn’t just outperform prior expectations, but also smashed Diageo advertising ROI
benchmarks.
Baileys was now delivering the highest advertising ROI of any Diageo spirits brand in any market in Europe
(Figure 50).
Figure 50: Medi ROI benchmarks
Source: Data2Decisions
And the creative and media optimisations helped the campaign gain momentum, with the second iteration of the
campaign delivering a media ROI of 2.39, representing a 28% increase on the first (Figure 51).
Figure 51: Comparing the median ROI of both iterations of ‘Don’t mind if I Baileys’
Source: Data2Decisions
And most importantly, was the new approach more profitable than the previous strategy?
The new strategy enabled us to deliver more profit for less investment. We were more effective and more
efficient. The ‘Don’t mind if I Baileys’ campaign delivered an ROI 30% higher than the average for Baileys
campaigns over the previous four years.
Whilst we are not able to divulge absolute profit figures in this paper we can confirm that, compared to the
previous four years of Baileys advertising, the campaign delivered 18% more incremental gross profit despite a
6% drop in average annual media investment, this meant that average annual net profit generated (incremental
gross profit less costs) increased 54%, a highly amplified bottom line impact (Figure 52).
Figure 52: Performance change: pre vs. post campaign launch
Source: Carat, Data2Decisions, Diageo
Following our recipe: what we learned
Go back to the heart of the brand and the product: Strip away the marketing and challenge yourself to
understand what it is about what you’re selling that might motivate consumers. Our radical reframes were only
possible when we liberated ourselves and the brand from the ephemeral, causes, crusades and conceptual
benefits that had characterised communications to-date. The breakthrough came from celebrating what
consumers loved most – the product itself.
Break out of your category: Marginal gains might cut it for Olympic cycling teams, but when every metric is in
trouble, you have to be brave enough to break the rules.
Consider a trigger model: Marketers often believe there needs to be a choice between building a brand and
driving consumption, but there need not be. A trigger model can be used to reach people more often and in more
relevant occasions whilst simultaneously building a brand for the long-term.
There’s power in simplicity: A simple yet powerful strategy not only makes it more likely the approach will thrive
beyond the marketing team, it also increases the chances of the total business being able to deliver against it.
Never underestimate the power of the sprinkle on top of an already great cake: If a campaign looks like it’s
working in Year 1, don’t rest, make it work harder.
The proof in the pudding: discounting other factors
Econometric modelling conducted by Data2Decisions isolated the incremental sales growth driven by the new
communications approach.
This section demonstrates how none of the other key sales drivers could have been responsible for the
turnaround in sales performance for Baileys. In the below section we refer to the ‘pre’ period as the four years
leading up to the launch of ‘Don’t mind if I Baileys’ and the ‘post’ period as the two years after the launch of ‘Don’t
mind if I Baileys’ unless stated otherwise.
Price and promotions
The turnaround in sales performance for Baileys was not driven by a reduction in price neither a lower shelf
(everyday) price nor through more price promotions. In fact, the average off-trade selling price increased slightly
in the period during the campaign (Figure 53).
Figure 53: Total Baileys off-trade – average price per litre
Source: Nielsen “total coverage” off trade data
Whilst Baileys has few direct competitors of any significant scale, the average selling price of other liqueurs over
the same period followed a similar trajectory with an increase in average selling price of c.1%.
Similarly, we can see that the percentage sold on promotion and frequency of promotional price discounting has
actually either remained flat or decreased on the two original Baileys SKUs that account for over 90% of total
Baileys volume sales (note the impact of flavoured variants is covered in the ‘product range’ section below)
(Figures 54 and 55).
Figure 54: Average weekly percentage sold on promotion
Source: Nielsen total Grocery Multiples data
Figure 55: Average weekly percentage of stores runing a promotion
Source: Nielsen total Grocery Multiples, % PCW distribution “any promotion”
In-store activity
Alongside price promotions, Baileys will also typically feature in front-of-store displays at key times of year with
retailers also featuring Baileys promotions in their own marketing material and leaflets, especially at Christmas.
While distribution and price remain the same, we have seen a 1% uplift in store displays which reflects the fact
that belief in the campaign drove commercial activation in GB. However, within the model, there is no evidence
that increases in levels of in-store activity or number of special features by retailers was a key reason for the
sales increase (Figures 56 and 57).
Figure 56: Baileys OIC in-store display distribution
Source: Nielsen Total Grocery Multiples data, average weekly weighted distribution
Figure 57: Baileys OIC freature and display distribution
Source: Nielsen Total Grocery Multiples data, average weekly weighted distribution
Product range
Although Baileys benefited historically from regular new flavour launches, over the last eight years, sales of
flavoured variants has been in decline, prompting Diageo to focus on producing a smaller number of more
sustainable flavour variants. As such, the product range has actually shrunk since the campaign launch, with all
of the brand growth being driven by the core Baileys Original Irish Cream variant (Figure 58).
Figure 58: Baileys flavours volume sales as a percentage of total
Source: Nielsen ‘total coverage’ off-trade data
Distribution
Distribution for the main Baileys SKUs remained high throughout the period in question with minimal change
since launch of the new campaign. However as mentioned above, the decline in flavours sales has inevitably led
to reductions in distribution levels with flavoured Baileys SKUs reducing, on average, by 23% in the post
campaign period (Figure 60).
Figure 60: Average weekly Baileys distribution
Source: Nielsen ‘Grocery Multiples’ off-trade data
Economy and market factors
Whilst we do not see any evidence of a direct link between macroeconomic conditions and Baileys sales, it is
safe to say that the UK economy has not been a key driver of Baileys sales growth since the launch of the
campaign. Consumer confidence has been in decline due to the various political and economic headwinds in the
UK whilst GDP growth has continued to flatline (Figure 61).
Figure 61: Macroeconomic indications
Source: OECD CCI index & ONS quarter on quarter GDP growth rate (CP SA %)
Spend level/reach
As discussed above, a key pillar of the new Baileys strategy was to put simple, delicious content in front of
consumers at the right moments to trigger treating. This opened up the possibility of significant efficiencies in
media buying, especially in video as the strategy shifted from the longer ‘cinematic’ video content towards
shorter format content and a digital-first strategy. This meant that over the two years since the launch of the new
strategy the average annual media spend dropped by 7.1% whilst reach was maintained at c. 93% against the
target audience of 18+ women in GB. The growth in sales was therefore not driven simply by increasing spend,
the new campaign and media strategy delivered more profit for less investment.
Notes
1. Diageo internal sales data.
2. Data2Decisions econometric modelling.
3. Diageo internal sales data.
4. Millward Brown brand tracking 2015/16.
5. Diageo internal sales data.
6. Millward Brown brand tracking 2015/16.
7. Millward Brown brand tracking 2015/16.
8. Diageo internal sales data.
9. Millward Brown brand tracking 2015/16.
10. Diageo internal sales data.
11. IPA databank.
12. Diageo Demand Spaces research.
13. Proper Tasty audience survey 2016.
14. Carat 2017.
15. TasteMade audience survey 2017.
16. Facebook 2017.
17. Millward Brown Optimer 2017.
18. Diageo internal sales data.
19. Millward Brown 2017.
20. Millward Brown 2017.
21. Millward Brown 2017.
22. Millward Brown 2017.
23. Millward Brown 2017.
© Copyright IPA, Institute of Practitioners in Advertising, London 2018
Institute of Practitioners in Advertising
44 Belgrave Square, London SW1X 8QS, UK
Tel: +44 (0)207 235 7020, Fax: +44 (0)207 245 9904
www.warc.com
All rights reserved including database rights. This electronic file is for the personal use of authorised users based at the subscribing
company’s office location. It may not be reproduced, posted on intranets, extranets or the internet, e-mailed, archived or shared electronically
either within the purchaser’s organisation or externally without express written permission from Warc.
https://www.warc.com