marketing analysis for senior community

I need you to write a marketing analysis for senior community which is like a summary or a foundation for the marketing plan. it should be around 10 pages long and i will provide all the information of the senior community and the outline and an example. you will have less then 48 hours to do it.  

Save Time On Research and Writing
Hire a Pro to Write You a 100% Plagiarism-Free Paper.
Get My Paper

you will need marketing and senior nursing background 

it is due before  4 PM PST, 03.05.2021 and i will need it at least one hour before the deadline  

Outline for Marketing Plan

Highlighted in yeller are the components for the Midterm

Save Time On Research and Writing
Hire a Pro to Write You a 100% Plagiarism-Free Paper.
Get My Paper

1. Executive Summary

2. Mission, Vision, Values of your organization

3. Overview of Community

4. Current financial situation

5. Demographic Analysis

6. Customer Profile

7. Competitive Analysis

8. SWOT

9. Goals

10. Strategy

11. Tactics

12. Implementation

13. Performance Evaluation

2

>Compitive Ana

l

ysis

AL MC

Analysis Imagine Senior Living LLC

Competitor

Park

Living

Brookdale Senior Living

Aventine Senior Living

units/Licenses

MC 80 Type B

290 Haebner Rd San Antonio TX

2000

1 mile

2mile 2mile

2.5mile

Occupancy Occupancy Occupancy Occupancy Occupancy Occupancy

AL MC Total AL Total AL MC Total AL MC Total AL MC Total AL Total MC Total

94%

Base Room Rate Pricing (Include SQFT) Base Room Rate Pricing (Include SQFT) Base Room Rate Pricing (Include SQFT) Base Room Rate Pricing (Include SQFT) Base Room Rate Pricing (Include SQFT)

AL MC AL AL MC AL MC AL MC AL MC

(286-335)

0

e

3200

Levels of Care Levels of Care Levels of Care Levels of Care Levels of Care Levels of Care

AL MC AL AL MC AL MC AL MC AL MC
1 100

250 250

included 500 included

2

650 650

750 950

3 600

850 850

1150

4 900

1200 1200

1450

5
6

Additional Fees Additional Fees Additional Fees Additional Fees Additional Fees Additional Fees

$2,000 $1,500

500 AL / 800 MC

$1,000

850

5

165 AL / 175 MC 165 AL / 175 MC

Services Services Services Services Services Services

/on call

40 hour week director/on call 40 hour week director/on call 40 hour week director/on call 40 hour week director/on call 40 hour week director/on call

40 hour week director/on call 40 hour week director/on call 40 hour week director/on call 40 hour week director/on call 40 hour week director/on call 40 hour week director/on call

yes no yes yes yes

Care givers Care givers Care givers Care givers Care givers Care givers

no no no no yes no no

yes yes yes yes no yes yes

yes yes yes yes yes yes yes

yes yes no yes yes yes yes

yes yes yes yes yes yes yes

40 hour week director 40 hour week director 40 hour week director 40 hour week director 40 hour week director 40 hour week director 40 hour week director

3 meals and snacks

3 meals and snacks 3 meals and snacks 3 meals and snacks 3 meals and snacks

and Kitchenets

Kitchens Kitchenets

Kitchenets Kitchenets

Alz Training No No

l
Competitor Current Community Competitor #

1 Competitor #2 Competitor #

3 Competitor #

4 Competitor #

5 Competitor #

6
Date Completed: 7-Apr-

20
The Gardens of Castle Hills Brookdale Alamo Heights Brookdale Oakwell The Etta of Shava

no The William

AL/MC The Villa De San Antonio Arden Courts
Owner Eagle Senior Living Brookdale Senior Living Aventine Senior Living Kisco Senior Living .
Type/

Total AL CCRC – AL 46 AL 52 MC 26 AL/MC

100 AL/MC 112 AL 61 MC 64
Address 1207 Jackson Keller Rd, San Antonio TX 78213 855 E. Basse Rd San Antonio TX 78209 3360 Oakwell Court San Antonio TX 78218 4046 DeZavle Rd San Antonio TX 78219 9203 Cinnamon Hill San Antonio TX 78240 8103 Worth Hollow Dr San Antonio TX 78240 15
Distance/ Miles from Imagine SL Ventura Hills 3.5 6.7 6.6 6.9 7.7 6.2
Age of building 2000
Market Location/Miles 1 mile 2mile 2.5mile
Physical Plant/Décor
Curb Appeal/First Impression
Any Recent Renovations
Occupancy
Assisted Living/Memory Care
Total Community Occupied 52% 94% 97%
Base Room Rate Base Room Rate Pricing (Include SQFT)
Small Private Studio Apt 2595 (340-435) 1945 2

900 2

70
Medium Private Studio Apt 3

800 4470 (363)
Large Private Studio Apt 2295 2800-3095 6125
EXL Private Studio/ALCOVE 2895 (485)
1 Bedroom Apt/ 1 Bedroom Delux 3095 (560) 5150 (315-370) 3200 3295-3

400 4000 2200-2800 3540-3900 (602-641) 3100
2 Bedroom Apt 3

600 4240(700)
Companion/semi private 4150 (570) 1895 3375 (363)
Semi Private
Levels of Care
All Inclusive included Included
250 500 395
300 650 750 950 775
850 1150 1100
1200 1450 1400
Meds – incont care
Additional Fees
Community Fee 2000 MC /1750 AL $1,500 $2,000 $1,200 $2,500
Deposit/Holding Fee
Motorize Wheel Chair Fee
Second Person fee $1,000 $500 500 AL / 800 MC 1000 AL / 2000MC $850
Pets/Fee/weight
Laundry
Smoking Deposit
Appliances stainless steal
Updated Apartment
Extra house keeping
Bed making daily
clothing ironing
Deep cleaning/drawers, closet
ER pick up or transportation
Car Port, garage
Pendants
Respite 150 AL 175 MC $

16 165 AL / 175 MC $175 $200
Services
RN on

staff 40 hour week director 40 hour week director/on call
LVN on

Staff
Med Aids/Care Givers yes LVNs on each shift
Dedicated dining room staff Care givers
Community showers
Showers in rooms
Bus transportation for activities/outings
Secure courtyards/ walking paths
Housekeeping/Laundry
Activity Director/Assistant
Meals offered/included/Snacks 3 meals and snacks 2 meals
Full Kitchens/kitchenets Kitchenets Kitchens N/A
Specialized dementia technologies In touch computer life stations Pathways No Alz Training
Sales Director was very nice and informative with discovery question, offering information about the community and speaking highly of surrounding areas to shop and highlights. Because of the Covid-19 virus, I was not able to visit the community. However, the sales director sent by email serval photos of the community, a virtual tour of the community, floor plans of apartments, layout of the community, pricing and a activity calendar. She was positive about the community, residents have easy access to the common area, a certified chef and Wednesday home made cinnamon rolls are made, activities has something always going on to keep residents interested day to day. They have two nurse to support the wellness needs. When I first called, I could not understand the concierge. I was put on hold 3 different times until I was told the sales director was in a meeting and she will call you back. I did get a call back one hour later. AL and Skill Nursing/Rehab. Called and left a message for the sales director to call me. I had to call the sales director back. She seem to be bothered and gave me the basic information. The community does have openings. Because the skill nursing is attached the community is able to transition their residents into skill.. Sales Director was professional and helpful with information on community. I was encouraged to do a virtual tour with face time. They community stays full as they only have three openings at this time. Sales Director was engaging and professional. Listen to my needs Sales Director sent virtual tour and information and pricing on community. She was professional ask a lot of questions and was interested in my needs through the process. Community stays full per sales director. Executive director, business director, and wellness director all having a nursing back ground. The community raves on their food and activities. I was assured, if I asked a resident what they liked about the community they would say, food and activities. 4 themed houses, laundry in each house, staffed with caregivers, their is an LVN on each shift, secured continuous walking path outside. Wellness Center
Outdoor Courtyard with garden areas and Furnished apts offered. Neurologist/physician visit community 2-3 times per week. Arden Courts in Granbury is also knowen to take in psych residents and mixing with their ALZ/Dementia. They do have openings.

Small AL and MC

Current Community

Competitor #2

Date Completed: 7-Apr-20 7-Apr-20 7-Apr-20
Competitor

Owner

Address

Distance/ Miles from Imagine SL 6.7

Age of building

Market Location/Miles

Physical Plant/Décor
Curb Appeal/First Impression
Any Recent Renovations

Occupancy Occupancy Occupancy
Assisted Living/Memory Care AL Total AL MC Total AL MC Total
Total Community Occupied 16

15 100% 15 100%

Base Room Rate Base Room Rate Pricing (Include SQFT) Base Room Rate Pricing (Include SQFT)
AL MC

MC AL MC

Small Private Studio Apt
Medium Private Studio Apt

-4500

Large Private Studio Apt

3800-4800

1 Bedroom Apt/ 1 Bedroom Delux
2 Bedroom Apt
Companion/semi private 3500

3000-3500

Levels of Care Levels of Care Levels of Care
AL MC AL MC
All Inclusive Included Included Included Included Included
1
2
3
4

5
6
Meds – incont care

Additional Fees Additional Fees Additional Fees
Community Fee $500

$1,000

Deposit/Holding Fee
Motorize Wheel Chair Fee

Second Person fee
Pets/Fee/weight

Laundry
Smoking Deposit
Appliances stainless steal
Updated Apartment
Extra house keeping
Bed making daily
clothing ironing
Deep cleaning/drawers, closet
ER pick up or transportation
Car Port, garage
Pendants

Respite
Services Services Services

No No No

NO NO

Med Aids/Care Givers yes yes yes
Dedicated dining room staff yes yes yes
Community showers no no no
Showers in rooms no no no
Bus transportation for activities/outings yes yes yes
Secure courtyards/ walking paths yes yes yes
Housekeeping/Laundry yes yes yes
Activity Director/Assistant Staff staff staff
Meals offered/included/Snacks 3 meals and snacks 3 meals and snacks 3 meals and snacks
Full Kitchens/kitchenets NO NO NO
Specialized dementia technologies

ALZ and Dementia Training

Care staff, do all ADL care, prepare meals, assist in activities, medication assitance, ect. No nurse on site, all residents are under the care of Hospice or Home Health Care.

Competitor Analysis Imagine Senior Living LLC Competitor #1
Parkway Assisted Living Pipestone Place Assited Living Carol Anns Home – Chamber
Parkway Senior Living Pipestone Senior Living Carol Anns Home Senior Living
Type/Total units/Licenses AL 16 AL/MC 15 AL/MC 15
4331 Parkway Dr San Antonio TX 2104 Pipestone Dr San Antonio TX 8005 Chambers Rd San Antonio TX
8 miles 4 miles
2006
100%
AL/IL
4500 3500 6000
3800-4800
Extra Large Private Studio Apt
2500-3500 3000-3500
Semi Private 1BR
$800
RN on staff
LVN on Staff NO
ALZ and Dementia Training
Care staff, do all ADL care, prepare meals, assist in activities, medication assitance, ect. No nurse on site, all residents are under the care of Hospice or Home Health Care. Care staff, do all ADL care, prepare meals, assist in activities, medication assitance, ect. No nurse on site, all residents are under the care of Hospice or Home Health Care. Two other location 7/8 miles from Ventura, 16/8 apt and they stay 100% full at 4500 rates. (Hilton Head & Wayward home)

Resort Style Communities

Competitor Analysis Imagine Senior Living LLC Competitor #1 Competitor #2
Date Completed: 7-Apr-20 7-Apr-20
Competitor

Owner

Type/Total units/Licenses

AL/MC

Address

Distance/ Miles from Imagine SL

Age of building

Market Location/Miles

1.5 miles

Physical Plant/Décor
Curb Appeal/First Impression
Any Recent Renovations

Occupancy Occupancy
Assisted Living/Memory Care AL MC Total AL MC Total
Total Community Occupied 70 20 100%

100%

Base Room Rate Pricing (Include SQFT) Base Room Rate Pricing (Include SQFT)

AL MC AL MC

Small Private Studio Apt

Medium Private Studio Apt
Large Private Studio Apt

Extra Large Private Studio Apt

1 Bedroom Apt/ 1 Bedroom Delux

2 Bedroom Apt

Companion/semi private

Semi Private 1BR

Levels of Care Levels of Care
AL MC
All Inclusive

Included

1 included included 400
2 400 400 600
3 400 400 800
4 400 400 1200
5

6
Meds – incont care

Additional Fees Additional Fees
Community Fee

Deposit/Holding Fee
Motorize Wheel Chair Fee

Second Person fee

Pets/Fee/weight
Laundry
Smoking Deposit
Appliances stainless steal
Updated Apartment
Extra house keeping
Bed making daily
clothing ironing
Deep cleaning/drawers, closet
ER pick up or transportation
Car Port, garage
Pendants

Respite

Services Services
RN on staff 40 hour week director/on call 40 hour week director/on call
LVN on Staff 40 hour week director/on call 40 hour week director/on call
Med Aids/Care Givers yes yes
Dedicated dining room staff yes yes
Community showers no no
Showers in rooms yes yes
Bus transportation for activities/outings yes yes
Secure courtyards/ walking paths yes yes
Housekeeping/Laundry yes yes
Activity Director/Assistant 40 hour week director 40 hour week director
Meals offered/included/Snacks 3 meals and snacks 3 meals and snacks
Full Kitchens/kitchenets

Kitchens and Kitchenets

Specialized dementia technologies

No

Adonte Senior Living Franklin Park Alamo Heights
Sagora Franklin Park Senior Living
AL/MC /IL
2702 Cembalo Blvd San Antonio TX 230 W Sunset Rd San Antonio TX
3.8 3.3
2011
1.5 miles
98%
3770 6235(337-340)
5400
4663 4524-4732
5132 5195 6443
Point sytem Point Sytem
1600
$3,500 $3,000
850 AL / 1500 MC
165 AL/ MC 250
Kitchens and Kitchenets
Sagora Pathways, Personalized Life Skills Stations, Dining With GRACE
Large luxury campus community Large luxury campus community,

2

>

Income Statement

Income Statement

1 December 2019

2 3

$0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00

$0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00

$0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00

$0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $13.93 $88.07 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00

-$838.25 -$91.40 -$126.75 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $13.93 $88.07 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 -$954.40

$0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00

$2,250.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00

Room & Board AL

$140,129.78 $136,413.32 $137,678.40 $136,396.62 $126,981.36 $141,255.80

$144,730.62 $146,857.03 $152,268.59 $133,997.42

$0.00 $0.00

$0.00 $0.00 $0.00

$1,800.00 $1,800.00

$840.00 $0.00 $0.00

$0.00 $0.00

$300.00

$320.00 $310.00

$0.00 $0.00

$0.00 $0.00

$0.00 $0.00 $0.00

$0.00 $0.00

$0.00 $0.00

$0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00

$8,087.00

$1,800.00

$0.00

$1,000.00

$0.00

$0.00

$6,250.00 $1,000.00 $0.00

$0.00 $0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00 $0.00

$0.00 $0.00 $625.00

$204.00 $204.00 $204.00 $204.00

$0.00 $0.00 $54.00

$0.00 $0.00

$450.00

$0.00 $0.00

$0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00

$0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00

$347.00 $347.00

$0.00

$0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $800.00 $800.00 $0.00 $0.00

$0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00

$0.00 $0.00 $1,695.00

$0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00

$0.00

$0.00

-$9,618.12

-$250.00 -$250.00

$0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00

-$9,868.12 -$9,868.12 -$9,868.12 -$7,489.80 -$10,959.12 -$14,498.27 -$14,735.87 -$5,833.87

Room & Board MC

$4,995.00

$0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00

$13,432.37 $5,995.00 $4,995.00 $4,995.00 $3,439.18 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $32,856.55

$4,995.00 $4,995.00 $3,439.18 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00

$171,018.26

$167,081.56 $174,604.23 $175,621.79 $129,258.42

$189,425.52 $173,002.50 $169,016.25 $171,807.21 $158,032.70 $171,018.26 $166,916.50 $170,487.96 $167,081.56 $174,604.23 $175,621.79 $129,258.42 $2,016,272.90

$861.74

$861.11

$0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00

$0.00 $0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$6,661.43

$0.00

$0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00

$0.00 $0.00 $0.00

$0.00 $0.00 $0.00

/ Benefits

$0.00

$0.00

$68.26

$0.00 $0.00 $0.00

$0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00

$0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00

$1,129.58 $1,129.58 $1,129.58 $1,129.58 $1,129.58 $1,129.58 $1,129.58 $1,129.58 $1,129.58 $1,129.58

$0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00

$141.73

$0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00

$0.00 $31.17

$0.00

$70.00

$87.50

$105.00

$100.00 $0.00

$0.00 $0.00 $0.00

$0.00 $0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00 $0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00 $0.00 $0.00

$0.00 $0.00 $48.49

$0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00

$10.42

$0.00 $0.00 $0.00

$0.00 $0.00

$82.23 $82.23 $82.23 $82.23

$0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00

$103.86

$0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00

$0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00

$0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00

$0.00 $0.00

$0.00

$0.00 $0.00 $0.00

$0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00

– Admin

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00

$0.00

$0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00

$0.00 $0.00

$336.43

$0.00

$0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00

$0.00 $0.00

$0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00

$0.00 $0.00

$0.00 $0.00

$0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $425.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00

$0.00 $0.00

$0.00 $0.00 $0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

– AL

$0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00

$5,474.61

$0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00

$68.30

$0.00

$0.00 $0.00

$0.00

$0.00 $0.00 $0.00

$0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00

-$40.65

$0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00

$0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00

$295.66

$0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00

$0.00 $0.00 $380.77

$0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $105.00 $0.00 $100.00

$0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00

$789.22 $0.00 $0.00

$0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00

$1,208.41

$0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $50.00 $0.00

$0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00

$0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00

$0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $206.48

$0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00

$0.00

$0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00

$557.56 $181.13 $0.00

$87.93

$0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00

$486.24

$0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00

$465.36

$0.00

$0.00 $0.00

$0.00

$0.00 $0.00 $0.00

$0.00 $0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00 $0.00 $0.00

$0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00

$0.00 $0.00

$0.00 $0.00

$0.00

$0.00 $0.00

$100.00 $100.00 $100.00 $100.00 $100.00

$79.50 $79.50

$79.50

$0.00

$0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00

$887.10 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00

$0.00 $0.00

$0.00 $0.00

$0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00

$0.00

$0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00

$0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00

$0.00 $368.05

– Dining

$0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00

$0.00

$0.00 $0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00 $0.00 $0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00

$0.00 $0.00 $267.00

– Dining

$0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00

$0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 -$406.81

$1.35

$0.00

$0.00 $0.00

$0.00

$0.00 $0.00

$0.00

$114.64

$0.00 $0.00 $0.00

$2,735.04

$0.00

$81.75

$87.20 $0.00

$0.00

$0.00 $0.00

$0.00 $0.00

$0.00

$0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00

$0.00

$0.00 $0.00 $0.00

$344.11

$0.00 $0.00 $0.00

$0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00

$0.00 $129.33

$162.20 $555.70 $245.94

-$48.34

$0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00

$0.00 $16.79

$1.39 $1.35

$1.39

$1.75

$0.00

$0.36

$0.00 $0.00

$0.00

$0.00 $0.00 $0.00

$0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00 $0.00

$0.00 $0.00

$0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00

$0.00 $57.35

$0.00 $0.00 $0.00

$0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00

$0.00 $0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $368.05

$0.00 $368.05

$0.00

$0.00 $97.00 $97.00 $97.00 $97.00 $97.00 $0.00 $0.00 $97.00

$0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00

$45.84

$0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00

$0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00 $0.00

$0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00

$0.00 $0.00 $930.95

$0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00

$150.00

$486.90

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00 $0.00

$0.00 $0.00

$0.00 $0.00

$0.00 $0.00 $0.00

$0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00

$2,318.73

$2,318.73 $2,805.87

$0.00 $0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00

$0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $1,881.36

$0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00

$0.00

$0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00

$0.00

$0.00 $0.00

$0.00 $0.00

$0.00 $0.00 $40.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00

$0.00 $0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00

$97.00 $0.00

$0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00

$0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $663.49

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00

$0.00

$0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00

$631.40 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00

$411.88

$0.00

$0.00 $0.00

$0.00

$114.66

$0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00

$0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00

$2,546.05

$0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00

$0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00

$0.00 $0.00

$0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00

$0.00 $0.00

$0.00 $0.00 $0.00

$0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00

$0.00 $0.00

$0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00

$0.00

$0.00 $0.00

$0.00 $37.35 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00

$0.00 $0.00 $0.00

$0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00

$0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $4,163.24

$0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00

$0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $1,900.00

$0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00

$0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $10,227.08

$0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00

$0.00

$0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $100.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $100.00

$0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00

$0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00

$0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $84.50

$0.00

$0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00

$0.00

$0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00

$0.00

$0.00 $0.00

$579.57

$579.57

$579.57

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00 $0.00 $0.00

$0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00

$0.00 $0.00 $176.19

$0.00 $0.00 $0.00

$0.00

$5,735.98

$0.00

$966.87 $0.00

$0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00

$100.66

$0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00

$0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00

$71.60

$0.00 $0.00

$0.00 $0.00 $0.00

$0.00 $0.00 $0.00

$0.00 $0.00

$0.00

$0.00 $0.00 $0.00

$0.00

$988.38 $988.38

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00

$0.00 $0.00

$200.00

$0.00 $0.00

$0.00 $0.00

$0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00

$0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00

$0.00

$0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00

$0.00 $228.11

$234.44

$0.00

$0.00 $195.31

$0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $50.00 $0.00

$0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00

$8.93

$0.00

$0.00 $0.00

$0.00

$0.00 $0.00 $0.00

$0.00

$0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00

$5,988.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$125.00 $0.00 $129.08 $0.00 $132.65 $209.82 $162.82 $168.00 $234.48 $360.00 $4.73 $0.00 $1,526.58

$0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00

$0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $17.32

$0.00

$10.42 $0.00 $0.00

$0.00

$74.11

$0.00 $0.00 $0.00

$0.00 $60.00

$115.00 $125.00

$0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00

$0.00

$0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00

$0.00 $0.00

$0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00

$0.00 $0.00 $16.34

Office Supplies $0.00

$0.00 $0.00

$0.00

Operating Supplies

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00 $0.00

$0.00

$0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00

$0.00

$0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00

$0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.38

$0.00 $0.00

$0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00

$0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00

$0.00

$0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00

$0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $2,342.80

$0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00

$178.62 $0.00 $0.00

$0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00

$0.00 $179.25

$90.00 $142.77 $45.00 $235.55 $123.85 $135.58 $126.15

$49.55

$37.13

, Insurance and Other

Insurance $0.00 $0.00

$264.13 $264.13 $264.13 $264.13 $264.13 $264.13 $264.13 $264.13 $264.13

$2,287.28

$8,455.71 $8,455.71 $8,455.71

$9,294.99 $9,294.99 $9,294.99

$3,153.56 $3,153.56 $3,153.56 $3,153.56 $3,153.56 $3,153.56 $3,153.56 $3,153.56 $3,153.56

$1,080.34 $1,080.34 $1,080.34 $1,080.34 $1,080.34 $1,080.34 $1,080.34 $1,080.34 $1,080.34 $1,080.34

$6,785.31

$12,953.74 $12,953.74 $12,953.74

$13,793.02 $13,793.02 $13,793.02

s

Management Fee

$12,000.00

$7,500.00 $8,301.77 $7,000.00 $9,379.00 -$8,466.44 $9,019.00 $667.56 $8,281.24 $8,888.43 $12,000.00 $15,966.44 $16,771.80 $95,308.80

Taxes

$0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00

$0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00

$17,637.32 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $51.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $17,688.32

Utilities

$87.88

$0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00

$546.40 $546.40 $546.40 $546.40 $546.40 $546.40 $546.40

$0.00 $0.00 $0.00

$12,000.00 $5,271.88

$4,105.20 $4,105.20

Total $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00

-$25,357.34 -$38,481.58 -$49,927.75 -$56,710.92 -$20,353.91 -$36,405.44

$0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00

-$22,851.63 -$22,851.63 -$22,851.63 -$22,851.63 -$22,851.63 -$22,851.63 -$22,851.63 -$22,851.63 -$22,851.63 -$22,851.63

-$18,559.12 -$18,559.12 -$18,559.12 -$18,559.12 -$18,559.12

$0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00

$0.00

$0.00 $0.00

$0.00 $0.00 $0.00

$0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00

$0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00

$0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 -$8,277.23

$0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00

-$1,051.29

$0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00

$0.00 $0.00 -$17.17

Vendor Rebates

$0.00

$0.00 $0.00

-$41,410.75

-$22,851.63

-$25,031.07

-$41,434.23 -$41,410.75 -$44,163.25 -$49,687.98 -$134,206.37 -$29,244.07 -$22,868.80 -$22,851.63 -$23,902.92

Add-Backs

$6,392.44 $6,392.44

$8,277.23 $8,277.23

$17.17 $17.17

Total $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $8,277.23 $0.00 $6,392.44 $17.17

-$50,388.41 -$80,157.33 -$91,012.31 -$98,145.15 -$61,764.66 -$80,568.69

Ventura Hills
For the month ended

3
Jan-20 Dec-19 Nov-19 Oct-19 Sep-19 Aug-19 Jul-19 Jun-19 May-19 Apr-19 Mar-19 Feb-19 Total
Revenue
Operating Revenue
Other Income
Employee Meals $0.00 $13.93 $88.07 $102.00
Late Fee AL
Total Other Income -$838.25 -$91.40 -$126.75 -$954.40
Total Operating Revenue
Room & Board AL
*Room & Board – AL
Respite Care AL $2,250.00 $4,500.00
$140,129.78 $136,413.32 $137,678.40 $136,396.62 $126,981.36 $141,255.80 $142,149.70 $143,232.10 $144,730.62 $146,857.03 $152,268.59 $133,997.42 $1,682,090.74
Total *Room & Board – AL $144,399.70 $145,482.10 $1,686,590.74
Additional Services – AL
Additional Care Services AL $54.00 $17,105.38 $26,544.59 $29,157.06 $32,077.40 $36,700.67 -$2,357.86 $139,281.24
Additional Resident AL $1,000.00 $800.00 $1,800.00 $104.92 $1,938.36 $840.00 $181.50 $11,104.78
Additonal Meals / Tray Svc AL $300.00 $310.00 $320.00 $50.00 $280.00 $2,190.00
Beauty Salon Contra AL -$62.00 -$364.00 -$577.00 -$313.00 -$507.75 -$618.00

$425.00 -$2,866.75
Beauty Salon AL $10,331.50 $9,420.00 $10,093.50 $9,897.00 $494.00 $533.00 $985.00 $477.00 $42,231.00
Care Level 1 AL $2,636.93 $3,159.00 $3,821.17 $4,912.00 $4,666.10 $3,612.00 $3,271.23 $26,078.43
Care Level 2 AL $8,087.00 $8,025.00 $8,107.91 $9,077.81 $8,568.00 $49,952.72
Care Level 3 AL $2,361.29 $72.79 $732.05 $623.85 $835.33 $6,425.31
Community Fees AL $6,250.00 $3,500.00 $2,000.00 $4,000.00 $750.00 $24,750.00
Guest Meals AL $240.00 $132.00 $180.00 $216.00 $100.00 $130.00 $10.00 $1,008.00
Guest Suite AL $625.00
Housekeeping AL $204.00 $279.00 $73.00 $1,426.00
Medication Fee AL $7,985.62 $9,229.65 $9,871.96 $11,300.63 $10,650.49 $13,800.33 $12,458.00 $450.00 $60.00 $76,256.68
Miscellaneous Resident Charge (AL) -$2,767.99 -$3,674.12 $1.00 -$6,441.11
Pendant Fee AL $359.10 $383.77 $510.00 $348.00 $499.53 $347.00 $549.00 $403.07 $378.40 $4,471.87
Pet Fee AL $1,600.00
Rate Lock Fees AL $1,695.00
Total Additional Services – AL $19,865.95 $26,528.33 $36,793.42 $40,260.59 $37,480.28 $39,630.58 $32,370.99 $32,407.59 $33,310.06 $42,245.47 $38,089.07 $1,094.87 $380,077.20
Concessions – AL
Concession – Rent AL -$9,868.12 -$7,489.80 -$10,959.12 -$14,498.27 -$14,735.87 -$57,551.18
Concessions – Additional Resident AL

$200.00 -$9,573.82 -$9,595.00 -$9,618.12 -$38,605.06
Concessions – Care Services AL -$3,795.00 -$4,254.68 -$750.00 -$250.00 -$9,549.68
Concessions – Rent AL $7,235.87 $5,183.93 -$5,833.87 $6,585.93
Total Concessions – AL $3,240.87 $929.25 -$10,323.82 -$9,845.00 -$99,119.99
Total Room & Board AL $163,236.60 $163,870.90 $164,148.00 $166,812.21 $154,593.52 $171,018.26 $166,902.57 $170,399.89 $167,081.56 $174,604.23 $175,621.79 $129,258.42 $1,967,547.95
Room & Board MC
*Room & Board – MC
$13,432.37 $5,995.00 $4,995.00 $3,439.18 $32,856.55
Total *Room & Board – MC
Total Room & Board MC $27,027.17 $9,223.00 $49,679.35
Total Revenue $189,425.52 $173,002.50 $169,016.25 $171,807.21 $158,032.70 $166,916.50 $170,487.96 $2,016,272.90
Gross Profit
Operating Expenses
Administration -A- Payroll
Business Office Director $2,310.02 $4,611.41 $4,457.42 $4,613.27 $4,457.52 $4,426.13 $3,506.71 $4,597.68 $4,002.83 $4,539.13 $6,566.61 $1,104.52 $49,193.25
Employee Benefits- Admin $277.11 $904.84 $833.30 $861.74 $833.95 $487.96 $833.64 $861.11 $833.34 $138.89 $8,588.73
Employee Recruiting – Admin $238.00 $7,800.00 $8,038.00
Employee Uniforms – Admin $98.52 $190.12 $235.87 $395.27 $363.32 $299.95 $485.92 $16.69 $755.61 $71.01 $2,912.28
Employment Screenings – Admin $395.90 $486.90 $690.52 $1,871.89 $198.00 $288.52 $416.57 $405.44 $498.82 $988.26 $495.00 $6,735.82
Executive Director $12,175.01 $8,076.92 $12,115.38 $10,099.16 $6,660.90 $6,761.42 $6,661.43 $6,760.90 $6,810.90 $6,661.42 $89,444.87
Executive Director Bonus $1,700.00 $150.00 $1,850.00
Executive Director

Taxes $1,955.84 $819.91 $1,309.23 $1,459.31 $976.16 $802.42 $792.14 $803.63 $808.55 $791.46 $889.24 $11,407.89
Holiday Pay – Admin $247.88 $395.08 $321.48 $68.26 $298.52 $49.24 $341.61 $1,790.33
Overtime – Admin $131.78 $13.95 $34.57 $79.83 $35.77 $3.20 $35.33 $1.14 $335.57
Payroll Service Fee $2,431.66 $2,597.82 $2,662.16 $2,666.95 $2,386.29 $2,691.41 $2,899.30 $2,813.91 $2,868.49 $2,790.76 $3,746.19 $1,579.48 $32,134.42
Payroll Taxes – Admin $611.02 $690.77 $518.48 $544.15 $518.93 $545.00 $548.23 $548.20 $1,805.87 $3,589.02 $1,075.51 $187.10 $11,182.28
PTO/Sick Leave Wages – Admin $819.57 $807.27 $290.48 $277.22 $291.51 $583.20 $1,182.09 $47.68 $614.99 $91.30 $397.37 $91.32 $5,494.00
Receptionist/Concierge $1,791.31 $1,980.55 $1,708.22 $2,222.53 $1,966.14 $2,032.47 $2,144.52 $2,185.79 $2,172.11 $2,077.47 $3,084.99 $546.67 $23,912.77
Salaries & Wages – Hourly – Admin
Workers Comp – Admin $2,452.83 $1,129.58 $14,878.21
Total Administration -A- Payroll $25,698.45 $22,501.05 $26,226.37 $25,981.67 $21,187.24 $20,225.59 $20,838.72 $20,793.47 $22,437.08 $23,661.11 $33,497.96 $4,849.71 $267,898.42
Administration -B- Operating Expenses
Bad Debt Other $141.73
Bank Fees $31.17
Cell Phones Directors/Managers $105.00 $70.00 $87.50 $140.00 $35.00 $128.94 $928.94
Computer Software Maintenace $1,159.96 $1,075.02 $706.94 $1,032.38 $1,054.20 $3,280.27 $137.84 $768.48 $874.20 $982.54 $1,726.14 $1,109.90 $13,907.87
Copier Lease $1,704.07 $1,321.31 $1,897.91 $954.70 $1,466.90 $451.62 $519.35 $514.32 $617.72 $726.15 $1,330.89 $664.71 $12,169.65
Copier Maintenance & Overages $186.40 $749.91 $947.92 $787.38 $2,161.13 $4,832.74
Dues & Subscriptions – Admin $1,040.03 $1,084.29 $1,117.49 $1,125.90 $1,319.91 $1,324.47 $316.13 $1,892.39 $5.00 $106.92 $9,332.53
Employee Appreciation – Admin $67.57 $89.18 $24.67 $11.44 $29.60 $324.20 $82.18 $212.82 $841.66
Flowers – Admin $48.49
Food-Admin $10.42
Interest / Finance Charges $76.77 $216.34 $82.23 $704.26
Internet $103.86
IT Email Services $144.54 $176.13 $320.67
Licenses & Permits Admin $709.25 $372.49 $1,081.74
Management Company Travel $454.32 $4,715.67 $3,851.63 $3,461.48 $1,694.42 $2,360.09 $12,000.00 $5,271.88 $33,809.49
Meals & Entertainment – Admin $442.38 $352.47 $199.45 $344.56 $130.06 $1,468.92
Office Supplies $38.11 $114.53 $633.94 $301.68 $735.27 $558.68 $877.64 $1,281.97 $676.51 $632.29 $5,850.62
Postage & Delivery $105.14 $64.27 $164.06 $44.28 $247.61 $196.23 $249.27 $178.84 $486.35 $230.34 $175.29 $473.96 $2,615.64
Postage Meter – Lease Equip $391.28 $32.00 $290.59 $713.87
Professional Fees Accounting -$2,844.67 $336.43 $350.93 $1,820.88
Professional Fees Other $525.00 -$87.08 $437.92
Resident Relations $49.77 $86.59 $86.02 $16.17 $238.55
Training and Meetings – Admin $4,105.20 $4,530.20
Total Administration -B- Operating Expenses $3,980.75 $7,701.31 $8,133.73 $8,310.19 $6,235.91 $3,285.11 $6,035.05 $3,880.58 $7,013.70 $10,352.60 $18,967.84 $10,224.17 $94,120.94
Assisted Living -A- Payroll
Bonuses – AL -$32.14 $82.14 $1,476.79 $1,148.21 $71.43 $203.57 $2,950.00
Employee Benefits Other – AL $429.11 $656.80 $483.22 $497.18 $486.95 -$107.93 $470.50 $676.75 $1,174.44 $1,062.24 $2,338.12 $610.22 $8,777.60
Employee Medical

Insurance $5,474.61
Employee Recruiting – AL $68.30
Employment Screenings – AL $21.58 $35.84 $20.10 $98.09 $31.94 $23.31 $56.29 $79.54 $82.12 $448.81
Health Services Director – AL $5,051.50 $6,389.40 $576.92 -$1,368.55 $4,680.09 $4,663.20 $4,882.83 $5,034.88 $5,017.99 $4,088.74 $4,440.11 $1,790.61 $45,247.72
Holiday Pay – AL $3,315.15 $3,976.32 $2,120.42 $548.92 $548.93 $2,133.89 $351.96 $1,827.29 $14,822.88
Overtime – AL $4,462.74 $4,410.28 $5,912.54 $8,226.31 $6,568.87 $3,408.36 $4,013.03 $3,214.03 $3,372.76 $2,851.42 $8,789.35 $983.85 $56,213.54
Payroll Taxes – AL $4,934.65 $4,966.10 $4,334.74 $3,835.40 $3,332.15 $3,537.52 $4,060.80 $4,678.00 $3,992.34 $2,464.54 $6,152.82 $3,056.43 $49,345.49
PTO/Sick Leave Wages – AL $1,166.79 $1,092.86 $332.51 $976.05 $1,067.99 $1,182.22 $470.21 $1,837.03 $1,147.95 $796.10 $1,222.57 -$13,430.91 -$2,138.63
Retirement Employee Matching – AL -$40.65
Salaries & Wages AL CNA/Res Assistant $14,654.02 $16,247.52 $20,227.02 $16,334.90 $17,984.23 $20,948.53 $20,352.24 $22,706.13 $23,140.85 $20,619.35 $27,333.54 $4,491.15 $225,039.48
Salaries & Wages AL LPN $2,936.37 $4,651.23 $5,048.78 $1,243.54 $2,952.44 $1,752.34 $18,584.70
Salaries & Wages AL Med Tech $13,462.75 $14,418.72 $13,969.32 $18,424.09 $8,042.61 $8,302.91 $10,263.29 $13,125.08 $9,084.53 $7,236.05 $12,442.57 $2,735.04 $131,506.96
Workers Comp – AL $295.66
Total Assisted Living -A- Payroll $50,434.66 $56,845.07 $53,025.57 $48,234.87 $42,793.95 $42,515.68 $48,146.89 $52,828.36 $48,837.69 $39,271.99 $65,875.09 $7,786.65 $556,596.47
Assisted Living -B- Operating Expenses
Consultants – AL $380.77
Contract Labor – AL $8,494.05 $9,217.92 $20,377.88 $18,394.84 $30,830.85 $4,386.33 $91,701.87
Dues & Subscriptions – AL $93.95 $298.95
EMAR $789.22 $1,578.44
Equipment Lease – AL $1,208.41
Hazardous Waste Disposal – AL $110.00 -$282.13 -$122.13
Licenses & Permits AL
Medical Supplies $265.72 $557.56 $181.13 $202.60 $6.50 $1,213.51
Mileage – AL $206.48
Supplies – Medical/ Charged to Residents AL $120.64 $1.88 $122.52
Wellness Supplies $362.25 $87.93 $232.76 $167.19 $150.82 $1,312.33 $417.98 $55.11 $2,786.37
Total Assisted Living -B- Operating Expenses $496.36 $9,058.90 $9,663.66 $20,545.07 $19,439.88 $33,363.17 $4,906.19 $1,075.34 $99,375.19
Dining -A- Payroll
Cooks $8,012.61 $8,771.56 $9,911.03 $8,098.68 $8,141.08 $7,625.18 $7,808.64 $8,033.81 $8,509.29 $8,808.61 $13,489.72 $2,784.80 $99,995.01
Dining Room Waitstaff $486.24
Director of Dining Service $4,253.20 $4,260.90 $4,113.95 $5,544.89 $5,366.01 $5,366.02 $4,042.41 $4,775.76 $5,291.52 $5,209.71 $7,328.33 $868.29 $56,420.99
Employee Benefits Other – Dining $966.37 $1,932.53 $2,069.74 $1,868.45 $2,866.20 $1,428.30 $2,602.83 $2,550.72 $2,669.10 $2,584.83 $2,670.41 $430.71 $24,640.19
Employee Uniforms – Dining $465.36
Employment Screenings – Dining $2.20 $2.18 $15.57 $13.69 $1.10 $13.12 $15.62 $8.02 $17.31 $88.81
Holiday Pay – Dining $1,308.46 $1,157.51 $733.80 $201.04 $201.05 $779.00 $116.13 $730.76 $5,227.75
Overtime – Dining $66.81 $507.04 $307.54 $33.32 $44.86 $135.93 $582.11 $36.73 $149.85 $1,864.19
Payroll Taxes – Dining $1,528.24 $1,483.87 $1,357.76 $1,212.45 $1,170.62 $1,264.69 $1,386.50 $1,291.82 $1,177.17 $941.64 $2,324.29 $418.48 $15,557.53
PTO/Sick Leave Wages – Dining $408.26 $1,738.58 $1,646.27 $659.20 $247.20 $965.95 $2,455.68 $1,377.17 $167.37 $975.27 $255.67 $10,896.62
Utility Workers $83.48 $1,314.15 $1,548.36 $1,103.35 $4,049.34
Total Dining -A- Payroll $16,479.34 $19,430.61 $19,914.93 $17,904.40 $18,299.69 $18,199.76 $20,681.40 $19,400.31 $18,967.97 $17,766.20 $26,937.87 $5,709.55 $219,692.03
Dining -B- Operating Expenses
China $82.39 $139.83 $490.28 $198.70 $458.55 $1,369.75
Contract Services – Menu $77.52 $79.50 $150.94 $141.98 $1,188.44
Dishwasher Chemicals $276.50 $227.20 $195.62 $93.20 $491.44 $493.58 $250.58 $910.47 $608.14 $222.04 $129.53 $3,898.30
Dishwasher Lease $8,140.92 $667.27 $887.10 $312.88 $10,895.27
Grease Trap Cleaning $843.25 $1,093.25 $1,255.73 $3,192.23
Kitchen Equipment R&M $148.29 $97.44 $245.73
Kitchen Hood Service $368.05
Kitchen Supplies $394.25 $588.08 $101.60 $379.80 $329.39 $590.55 $477.48 $408.93 $71.44 $401.23 $542.76 $14.37 $4,299.88
Operating Supplies $7.62 $184.51 $24.87 $217.00
Paper & Plastic Supplies – Dining $205.97 $186.00 $113.53 $64.73 $40.07 $144.39 $425.21 $145.92 $242.50 $353.37 $1,921.69
Raw Food $9,042.96 $9,399.45 $19,894.40 $10,656.24 $9,032.58 $12,043.78 $19,440.90 $18,974.36 $26,806.77 $31,868.95 -$14,057.63 $6,958.54 $160,061.30
Supplies – Cleaning – Dining $415.68 $377.34 $915.64 $1,392.30 $358.20 $1,066.30 $480.71 $5,006.17
Training and Meetings – Dining $267.00
Vendor Rebates -$406.81
Total Dining -B- Operating Expenses $19,039.61 $11,439.13 $20,587.51 $12,802.90 $10,332.06 $14,405.29 $24,216.42 $22,439.27 $27,156.41 $35,088.48 -$12,316.77 $7,592.26 $192,782.57
Housekeeping -A- Payroll
Employee Benefits Other – Housekeeping -$2.05 $3.94 $1.35 $1.39 $1.21 $2.79 $3.04 $2.49 $1.69 $1.75 $0.28 $19.23
Employee Uniforms – Housekeeping $207.74 $89.92 $51.70 $349.36
Employment Screenings – Housekeeping $0.38 $0.36 $2.53 $2.64 $0.18 $1.25 $0.23 $1.90 $4.13 $13.60
Holiday Pay – Housekeeping $200.48 $155.29 $87.20 $114.64 $209.35 $33.08 $220.68 $1,135.36
Housekeepers $1,821.84 $2,325.67 $2,626.94 $2,508.92 $2,585.11 $3,200.55 $3,159.12 $3,218.20 $3,271.60 $3,863.27 $901.54 $32,217.80
Payroll Taxes – Housekeeping $199.81 $296.27 $203.36 $207.20 $203.83 $240.11 $344.11 $364.37 $330.28 $230.86 $440.09 $74.53 $3,134.82
PTO/Sick Leave Wages – Housekeeping $81.75 $245.25 $40.87 $225.68 $155.67 $261.60 $238.05 $1,417.82
Total Housekeeping -A- Payroll $2,428.20 $3,272.65 $2,955.28 $2,971.62 $2,869.61 $3,166.93 $3,913.72 $3,821.44 $3,860.75 $3,508.28 $4,543.16 $976.35 $38,287.99
Housekeeping -B- Operating Expenses
Cleaning Supplies – Housekeeping $399.11 $610.27 $38.91 $236.13 $94.30 $300.61 $762.06 $245.94 $578.09 -$48.34 $3,217.08
Laundry Supplies $324.36 $301.54 $150.78 $413.47 $1,190.15
Operating Supplies – Housekeeping $1,026.43 $638.65 $429.45 $162.20 $555.70 $3,156.54
Paper & Plastic Supplies – Housekeeping $129.33
Total Housekeeping -B- Operating Expenses $840.40 $928.35 $299.18 $1,262.56 $1,163.82 $880.84 $1,106.17 $991.56 $8,388.38
Maintenance & Repair -A- Payroll
Director of Engineering $3,124.92 $3,401.16 $3,616.18 $4,138.84 $3,912.82 $4,378.97 $4,089.60 $3,318.86 $4,073.14 $4,011.43 $6,028.29 $685.71 $44,779.92
Employee Appreciation – Maintenance $16.79
Employee Benefits Other – Maintenance $9.97 $27.59 $37.02 $0.77 $1.53 $5.20 $7.20 $1.16 $96.32
Employment Screenings – Maintenance $0.94 $0.88 $6.34 $29.74 $0.44 $2.01 $11.96 $10.20 $62.87
Engineering Tech $735.69 $3,382.86 $2,342.72 $2,525.13 $2,349.70 $1,870.55 $1,413.89 $1,293.66 $3,271.48 $3,463.81 $3,150.61 $914.25 $26,714.35
Holiday Pay – Maintenance $358.14 $357.26 $289.56 $84.37 $84.38 $178.29 $40.56 $349.00 $1,741.56
Overtime – Maintenance $4.44 $119.50 $109.69 $8.48 $242.11
Payroll Taxes – Maintenance $633.82 $613.68 $575.37 $605.94 $585.36 $552.96 $458.86 $448.90 $629.84 $485.14 $1,022.35 $181.99 $6,794.21
PTO/Sick Leave Wages – Maintenance $277.02 $824.28 $423.77 $240.14 $324.89 $377.28 $150.91 $776.91 $240.53 $366.72 $4,002.45
Total Maintenance & Repair -A- Payroll $5,140.50 $8,607.71 $7,290.96 $7,541.18 $7,275.28 $7,265.35 $6,294.95 $5,885.22 $8,697.20 $8,085.47 $10,583.65 $1,783.11 $84,450.58
Maintenance & Repair -B- Operating Expenses
Building Repairs $622.35 $125.83 $534.71 $1,687.61 $9,107.37 $1,307.20 $863.88 $924.37 $15,173.32
Chemicals – Maintenance $57.35
Common Area Cleaning & Repairs $71.21 $197.42 $268.63
Contract Labor – Maintenance $389.70 $1,041.33 $551.14 $2,718.27
Dues & Subscriptions – Maintenance $194.00 $97.00 $873.00
Electrical Repair $45.84
Emergency Alert / Pendants $1,505.87 $1,841.83 $3,347.70
Exterminating Contract $1,455.21 $771.20 $811.88 -$150.00 $2,888.29
Fire Alarm & Fire Sprinkler R&M/Contractsvs $3,006.87 $1,633.07 $2,749.96 $3,136.00 $2,350.50 $2,825.51 $6,104.10 $1,445.71 $4,475.60 $27,727.32
Fire Extinguisher $930.95
Furniture & Equip Non CapX – Maintenance $306.81 $64.94 $521.75
General Maintenance Supplies $717.44 $484.31 $948.34 $2,004.36 $1,322.29 $459.00 $1,067.00 $1,521.84 $709.29 $209.23 $551.00 $10,481.00
General R&M $123.75 $98.03 $300.41 $495.13 $1,755.17 $350.73 $3,123.22
Generator Service $1,269.80 $1,409.89 $948.42 $3,628.11
Grounds Contract $176.73 $2,142.00 $2,318.73 $2,484.35 $2,805.87 $2,498.15 $2,878.94 $7,760.47 -$1,359.00 $29,149.57
HVAC Repair $780.19 $2,262.38 $1,437.26 $2,158.32 $3,693.09 $2,493.14 $876.72 $13,701.10
HVAC Supplies $1,881.36
Landscaping Other (Irrigation) $779.40 $222.93 $1,002.33
Landscaping Seasonal Plants $76.51 $101.28 $177.79
Licenses & Permits Maintenance $40.00
Light Bulbs/Electrical Supplies $214.43 $114.84 $301.35 $164.23 $163.17 $158.08 $169.89 $512.20 $2,383.07 $1,235.98 $5,417.24
Maintenace Equipment Repair $8.93 $228.18 $237.11
Other Maintenance $37.35 $421.75 $556.10
Painting R&M $663.49
Plumbing R&M $2,200.00 $1,755.00 $4,220.00 $385.00 $2,940.00 $11,500.00
Plumbing Supplies $693.00 $3,600.00 $166.27 $4,459.27
Turnover Suites

$631.40
Water Softner System – Supplies $479.14 $635.63 $1,172.26 $404.42 $546.13 $531.21 $464.08 $530.35 $367.14 $411.88 $644.43 $6,598.55
Total Maintenance & Repair -B- Operating Expenses $11,838.35 $6,773.47 $10,019.80 $16,503.13 $7,556.03 $10,549.13 $9,742.23 $17,472.16 $26,852.39 $19,037.41 $12,279.89 $1,186.63 $149,810.62
Marketing -A- Payroll
Employee Benefits Other – Marketing -$267.13 $302.80 $271.10 $504.63 $488.37 $291.68 $503.25 $489.63 $508.66 $492.26 $508.67 $82.04 $4,175.96
Employment Screenings – Marketing $0.82 $0.62 $4.31 $6.09 $0.60 $9.99 $0.41 $3.09 $6.97 $32.90
Holiday Pay – Marketing $163.59 $205.09 $184.34 $114.66 $388.66 $29.90 $1,200.90
Marketing Director $3,886.56 $3,396.53 $4,081.39 $4,081.72 $4,950.06 $5,081.73 $3,370.71 $4,423.73 $4,311.74 $4,825.14 $6,427.00 $731.57 $49,567.88
Move-In Coordinator $2,546.05
Overtime – Marketing $98.49 $11.70 $110.19
Payroll Taxes – Marketing $411.87 $440.34 $275.38 $391.78 $918.87 $761.69 $666.52 $453.47 $271.97 $263.72 $683.94 $117.10 $5,656.65
PTO/Sick Leave Wages – Marketing $293.10 $628.58 -$225.09 $1,040.94 $539.84 $13.17 $2,290.54
Sales Counselor – Marketing -$440.91 $67.55 $6,514.26 $3,311.56 $3,072.18 $1,036.83 $359.68 $13,921.15
Total Marketing -A- Payroll $4,488.81 $4,973.96 $4,150.52 $6,092.71 $12,986.22 $9,660.41 $8,562.85 $6,447.14 $5,095.46 $5,588.09 $7,619.61 $3,836.44 $79,502.22
Marketing -B- Operating Expenses
Advertising $416.00 $225.00 $995.00 $258.98 $1,894.98
Collateral $768.14 $168.79 $1,865.75 $1,212.97 $4,015.65
Community Outreach $260.90 $178.62 $244.33 $451.25 $1,172.45
Consultants – Marketing $4,163.24
Contract Labor – Marketing $1,900.00
Digital Media $10,227.08
Direct Mail $140.66 $2,015.80 $975.00 $7,631.25 $10,762.71
Dues & Subscriptions – Marketing
E-Mail Marketing
Event Outreach Flyers $84.50
Events $133.93 $134.51 $223.93 $114.71 $607.08
Furniture & Equip Non CapX – Marketing $2,526.65 $203.56 $82.25 $2,812.46
Leads/CRM $5,169.95 $579.57 $896.57 $597.00 $436.00 $554.15 $1,130.40 $218.75 $11,321.10
Lunch & Learn VA Seminar $39.65 $388.60 $428.25
Marketing Plan Development $176.19
Move-In / Resident Gifts $23.37 $30.44 $53.81
Paid Placement Search Marketing $1,249.86 $5,735.95 $5,735.98 $6,110.92 $6,601.60 $6,298.63 $966.87 $3,093.13 $42,495.79
Premiums/Giveaways $100.66
Print AD Development / Updates
Prospect Gifts/Meals $71.60
Public Relations $199.92 $19.98 $104.71 $21.65 $346.26
Referral Fees $2,800.00 $5,950.00 $600.00 $8,000.00 $2,500.00 $19,850.00
Social Media Marketing & Oversight $987.29 $988.38 $988.37 $1,454.00 $1,363.48 $635.37 $2,041.62 $666.62 $11,101.89
Supplies – Marketing $41.44 $7.57 $880.00 $412.98 $1,341.99
Traditional Media $510.13 $718.31 $622.29 $1,022.76 $112.53 $187.55 $195.00 $3,568.57
Travel – Marketing $1,760.63 $259.60 $488.57 $2,508.80
Travel Meals – Marketing $228.11
Website Hosting $234.44 $224.62 $342.15 $913.83 $798.00 $223.18 $4,282.81 $195.31 $7,644.09
Total Marketing -B- Operating Expenses $11,383.11 $8,323.83 $11,295.08 $9,029.19 $14,685.67 $11,331.96 $12,168.41 $15,611.49 $13,019.50 $13,823.30 $2,956.79 $15,777.01 $139,405.34
Memory Care -A- Payroll
Bonuses – MC $25.00 $551.79 $198.21 $825.00
Employee Benefits Other – MC -$203.96 $214.73 $9.44 $11.60 $14.42 $5.21 $12.20 $34.45 $313.88 $466.31 $1,128.21 $223.92 $2,230.41
Employment Screenings – MC $1.84 $11.02 $11.38 $8.18 $27.20 $24.90 $6.11 $20.78 $120.34
Holiday Pay – MC $1,095.50 $1,383.76 $934.87 $349.95 $349.96 $554.40 $72.87 $392.84 $5,134.15
Overtime – MC $909.30 $465.19 $431.73 $1,224.61 $788.27 $1,207.60 $1,664.67 $777.09 $472.72 $555.25 $1,569.28 $311.81 $10,377.52
Payroll Taxes – MC $1,123.07 $1,355.88 $1,120.68 $1,249.31 $968.15 $1,294.00 $1,472.87 $1,120.56 $898.18 $742.39 $1,390.06 $296.81 $13,031.96
PTO/Sick Leave Wages – MC $240.16 $1,179.84 $259.01 $1,175.69 $258.73 $594.50 $162.40 $126.71 $300.28 $656.73 $201.74 $5,155.79
Salaries & Wages MC CNA/Res Assistant $3,610.18 $3,614.80 $6,261.40 $6,412.15 $5,254.73 $5,811.45 $5,857.50 $4,631.02 $4,888.60 $7,584.26 $7,662.85 $1,320.79 $62,909.73
Salaries & Wages MC Med Tech $4,106.74 $7,607.67 $4,510.24 $4,851.29 $3,934.20 $5,815.69 $6,255.34 $5,044.90 $4,026.56 $2,151.45 $3,072.58 $931.49 $52,308.15
Salary & Wages – MC $5,988.00
Total Memory Care -A- Payroll $10,882.83 $15,830.80 $13,538.39 $14,986.03 $11,568.45 $15,111.59 $16,395.97 $12,066.40 $11,125.60 $11,820.72 $15,479.71 $9,274.56 $158,081.05
Memory Care -B- Operating Expenses
Wellness Supplies MC $125.00 $129.08 $132.65 $209.82 $162.82 $168.00 $234.48 $360.00 $4.73 $1,526.58
Total Memory Care -B- Operating Expenses
Resident Services -A- Payroll
Activities Aid – Lifestyles $1,382.77 $2,017.99 $1,978.36 $2,118.72 $1,784.51 $1,704.02 $1,960.73 $1,856.76 $1,813.25 $1,973.71 $2,652.21 $412.28 $21,655.31
Director / Manager – Lifestyles -$156.32 $5,923.22 $6,386.94 $6,002.67 $6,445.95 $6,442.74 $5,901.88 $6,621.42 $5,345.72 $6,261.20 $9,218.13 $1,647.36 $66,040.91
Employee Appreciation – Lifestyles $17.32
Employee Benefits Other – Lifestlyes $516.51 $1,837.68 $2,469.05 $2,551.36 $2,469.08 $1,429.90 $2,551.37 $2,427.28 $2,465.03 $2,385.51 $2,305.12 $362.82 $23,770.71
Employment Screenings – Lifestyles $0.42 $1.18 $8.37 $8.77 $0.66 $3.25 $0.59 $4.81 $38.47
Holiday Pay – Lifestyles -$697.33 $1,143.21 $458.59 $74.11 $426.54 $43.26 $135.85 $1,658.34
Payroll Taxes – Lifestyles -$87.62 $1,322.71 $670.81 $696.47 $660.22 $688.18 $690.91 $713.53 $653.40 $597.52 $1,334.64 $226.25 $8,167.02
PTO/Sick Leave Wages – Lifestlyes $1,231.07 $999.85 -$55.23 $982.91 $325.84 $775.08 $718.93 $171.97 $1,543.14 $263.37 $568.73 $49.03 $7,574.69
Total Resident Services -A- Payroll $3,069.79 $13,245.84 $11,916.89 $12,360.90 $11,759.71 $11,114.69 $12,253.61 $11,852.13 $11,961.20 $11,491.73 $16,078.83 $2,697.74 $129,803.06
Resident Services -B- Operating Expenses
Contract Entertainment $233.40 $115.00 $648.40
Decorations $57.98 $102.44 $160.42
Food – Lifestyles $4.48 $27.79 $91.34 $116.78 $240.39
MC Program Engagement $16.34
$236.95 $91.66 $328.61
$57.60 $187.69 $43.59 $361.41 $136.64 $145.40 $32.35 $45.47 $29.23 $234.61 $1,273.99
Resident Activities/Entertainment $80.00 $139.74 $160.00 $220.00 $288.94 $671.91 $770.62 $275.76 $168.01 $2,774.98
Special Events (Non Marketing) $30.16 $483.26 $1.07 $514.49
Total Resident Services -B- Operating Expenses $291.00 $444.22 $183.59 $254.74 $728.07 $261.64 $369.88 $349.08 $838.88 $1,474.21 $379.27 $402.62 $5,977.20
Transportation -A- Payroll
Drivers $587.97 $934.06 $1,153.43 $1,142.97 $1,011.59 $1,705.05 $260.42 $6,795.49
Employment Screenings – Transportation $0.07 $0.68 $1.47 $2.60
Payroll Taxes – Transportation $63.09 $100.22 $123.77 $105.50 $65.69 $182.95 $17.62 $658.84
Total Transportation -A- Payroll $651.06 $1,034.66 $1,277.27 $1,249.15 $1,078.75 $1,888.00 $278.04 $7,456.93
Transportation -B- Operating Expenses
Vehicle Fuel $90.00 $142.77 $45.00 $235.55 $123.85 $135.58 $126.15 $116.35 $116.85 $49.55 $120.65 $1,302.30
Vehicle Lease – Bus & Van $2,342.80
Vehicle Maintenance $163.03 $37.13 $378.78
Vehicle Tag $179.25
Total Transportation -B- Operating Expenses $2,622.18 $295.47 $299.90 $4,203.13
Utilities
Insurance – Auto $159.83 $264.13 -$901.87 $1,899.26
Insurance – General/Professional Liability $3,568.40 $2,287.28 $8,455.71 $9,294.99 $2,979.65 $82,125.41
Insurance – Property $3,782.12 $3,153.56 $3,250.77 $38,568.49
Insurance – Umbrella/Excess $1,666.84 $1,080.34 $13,550.58
Total Insurance $9,177.19 $6,785.31 $12,953.74 $13,793.02 $6,408.89 $136,143.74
Management Fee
$7,500.00 $8,301.77 $7,000.00 $9,379.00 -$8,466.44 $9,019.00 $667.56 $8,281.24 $8,888.43 $15,966.44 $16,771.80 $95,308.80
Total Management Fees
Taxes Real Estate $17,637.32 $51.00 $17,688.32
Total Taxes
Cable TV $87.88 $89.34 $92.06 $263.64 $1,127.86 $985.17 $1,974.48 $4,708.31
Electricity $5,596.90 $5,844.17 $6,476.33 $8,594.56 -$9,111.89 $7,707.22 $15,487.49 $7,891.50 $7,970.92 $7,479.41 $5,838.30 -$181.57 $69,593.34
Gas $427.46 $419.14 $389.65 $278.80 $233.00 $78.53 $206.16 $627.93 $218.66 $375.25 $476.13 -$155.29 $3,575.42
Telephone & Internet Communications $535.45 $3,911.15 $961.70 $5,595.90 $910.35 $2,402.37 $542.98 $3,446.23 $3,058.90 $1,466.55 $2,310.46 $614.32 $25,756.36
Trash Removal $546.40 $1,092.80 $5,464.00
Water & Sewer $6,567.10 $4,569.93 $6,802.26 $6,606.03 $2,300.70 $5,607.08 $3,508.12 $6,188.02 $5,000.00 $4,309.47 $4,039.88 -$122.83 $55,375.76
Total Utilities $13,761.19 $15,378.67 $15,265.68 $21,713.75 -$4,857.80 $16,341.60 $20,291.15 $18,700.08 $17,341.28 $14,758.54 $13,649.94 $2,129.11 $164,473.19
Total Utilities, Insurance and Other $48,075.70 $30,465.75 $29,050.99 $44,046.49 -$370.50 $38,365.34 $33,912.45 $40,774.34 $40,022.73 $40,551.56 $43,409.40 $25,309.80 $413,614.05
Total Operating Expenses $214,782.86 $211,484.08 $218,944.00 $228,518.13 $178,386.61 $207,423.70 $235,626.01 $258,396.11 $267,661.24 $276,618.56 $254,382.68 $98,748.77 $2,650,972.75
Operating Income / (Loss) -$25,357.34 -$38,481.58 -$49,927.75 -$56,710.92 -$20,353.91 -$36,405.44 -$68,709.51 -$87,908.15 -$100,579.68 -$102,014.33 -$78,760.89 $30,509.65 -$634,699.85
Add-Backs
Management Company Travel Expense During Transition $17,271.88
Travel Expense for Department Head Training in Birmingham <- Executive director and other facility personnel flew to Birmingham for on-site training at manager's corporate office
IT Transition Expenses (computer setup, etc.) -$262.16 $368.48 $474.20 $582.54 $1,326.14 $709.90 $3,199.10 <- Stabilized IT expenses are $400 per month
One-time Marketing Expenses (website setup, initial mailing, etc.) $4,668.41 $8,111.49 $5,519.50 $6,323.30 -$4,543.21 $8,277.01 $28,356.50 <- Projected stabilized marketing expenses through year-end 2019 are $7,500 per month. This adjustment eliminates one-time marketing expenses such as web-site development, initial direct mailing, collateral development, etc.
$4,406.25 $8,479.97 $5,993.70 $11,011.04 $8,782.93 $14,258.79 $52,932.68
NOI (Excluding Transition Costs) -$64,303.26 -$79,428.18 -$94,585.98 -$91,003.29 -$69,977.96 $44,768.44 -$581,767.17
Other Income and Expense
Unrealized Gain / (Loss)
Non-Operating Income/Expenses
Depreciation and Amortization -$8,475.90 -$22,851.63 -$259,843.83
Interest Expense -$16,557.81 -$18,559.12 -$111,354.74 -$239,267.27 <- monthly interest expense is $18,559. There was a true-up in June for the first 6 months of the year
Legal Expense (Acquisition & Licensing) -$590.95 -$501.67 -$2,752.50

$6,392.44 -$10,237.56 <- one-time legal fees related to acquisition and licensing
Marketing Cost – Start Up
Professional Fees – Property Tax Exemption Application

$8,277.23 <- one-time fees related to property tax exemption application
Owner Other Expense -$1,051.29
Start Up Cost

$17.17
$593.59 $392.19 $478.19 $1,463.97
Total Non-Operating Income/Expenses -$25,031.07 -$41,410.75 -$41,018.56 -$41,434.23 -$44,163.25 -$49,687.98 -$134,206.37 -$29,244.07 -$22,868.80 -$23,902.92 -$517,230.38
Total Other Income and Expense -$41,675.75 -$41,084.56 -$517,561.38
Net Income / (Loss) before Tax -$50,388.41 -$80,157.33 -$91,012.31 -$98,145.15 -$61,764.66 -$80,568.69 -$118,397.49 -$222,114.52 -$129,823.75 -$124,883.13 -$101,612.52 $6,606.73 -$1,152,261.23
One-time Legal Expenses Related to Acquisition & Licensing
One-time Professional Fees Related to Prop. Tax Exemption App.
Other Start-Up Costs
$14,686.84
Net Income / (Loss) Excluding Transition Costs -$105,714.01 -$213,634.55 -$117,437.61 -$113,854.92 -$92,829.59 $20,865.52 -$1,084,641.71

Juecan

Zhao (Ruby)

GERO 502

October 4, 2020

Juecan Zhao (Ruby)

GERO 502
October 4, 2020

Mission, Vision & Values

Mission Statement

“Our residents are our family and it means so much to us to make them happy with life.”

As children, they are willing to choose a senior living facility with a good living environment and excellent management services for their parents; as elderly people, they all want to entrust their later life to a quiet, comfortable, and happy place.

Through complete supporting facilities and caring service equipment, Ashley Place let the elderly residents not only enjoy high-end services, but also feel the warmth of home. What the community brings to the elderly is a sense of security and happiness in life. Ashley Place hopes that through their efforts, they can help children to fulfill filial piety, contribute to the development of society, and share worries for the nation and the government.

Vision Statement

The Ashley Place will innovate the service concept for the elderly, lead the new life of the elderly, and become the leader of the elderly care industry. They hope that they can let the elderly spend their twilight years in a harmonious and warm environment, and let them live a happy life, a longevity life, and age gracefully.

The Ashley Place takes the needs of the elderly as aspirations and the satisfaction of the elderly as the goal, make unremitting efforts to improve the quality of life of the elderly, and strive for a life-long struggle for a harmonious aging.

Organization Values

A person’s life has to go through different periods from infancy to the elderly. To respect the elderly is to respect the laws of life and social development. The elderlies are the precious wealth of the society. They work hard and selflessly in different jobs and contribute to the construction of the nation. Without the contributions of old people in the past, there would be no

present.

Peace and love are two essential values of the Ashley Place. Life is short. The employees in the Ashley Place hope to pass on the faith of love and peace to the residents in the community through their warm and thoughtful service. They treat residents as family members and do their best to care and support all the elderly in the community.

Overview of Community

Property Description

The Ashley Place is an assisted living facility located in Lodi, California, which covers an area of 2.03 acres, with a community building area of 37,227 square feet, where is adjacent to an independent skilled nursing facility. The community is facilitated with 73 units and 145 beds, including 39 studio units, 32 one-bedroom units and one half-room unit, in which all units are equipped with private toilets and showers.

The community is a single-story building with a parking lot located on the south side of the facility. The dining area, kitchen and social hall are located beside the corridor of the main entrance, adjacent to the administrative office and staff lounge. The western section of the building is a wing consisting of 17 units connected by a corridor, with renovation to include a small kitchen, the western wing could potentially be converted and secured to provide memory care services.

(See Floor Plan in next page)

Basic Services

The Ashley Place provides round-the-clock service, and the staff is awake 24 hours a day to meet the daily needs of residents and respond to emergencies. They provide living assistance and can take care of elderly people with limited mobility to complete daily tasks, including bathing, cooking and cleaning the room.

The community provides a wealth of convenient facilities and services, and they also provide residents with delicious meals every day. Ashley Place encourages the elderly to participate in sports and exercises and maintain social contact with their peers to keep a healthy lifestyle. Recreational activities in the community include re-education, health and wellness programs, and handicraft projects. There are also convenient facilities such as beauty salons, libraries, laundry rooms, living rooms, and convenience stores.

Additional Services

The Ashley Place provides different levels of care for residents in the community, so that the elderly will not affect their living experience in the community because of their own physiological problems. In addition to daily auxiliary services, the community can provide standby assistance for residents in need, such as helping them to complete the transfer from bed to wheelchair. For diabetic patients, monitoring insulin levels is an important task, and AP staff can help residents complete this task.

Current financial situation

From https://www.senioradvice.com/providers/view/the-ashley-place-lodi-ca

Looking at the assets with determined cash flow, the EBITDAR of Ashley Place in 2017 was $274,629, an increase of $13,477 compared to 2016, and the profit margin was 15%, which was an increase of 1% compared to 2016.

The occupancy rate of Lodi’s community (AL/MC) reached 97.0%, which is 25.8% higher than Ashley Place’s 2017A occupancy rate of 72.1% and 4.9% higher than Stockton MSA’s 90.8%. In addition, the average rent for the AL/MC community in Lodi is $3,690, which is $145 lower than the average rent of Stockton MSA of $3,835, and $903 lower than the average rent of Stockton MSA, and the average rent of the Ashley Place in 2017 is $2,932, is lower than the average level of the local market in Lodi and even in California.

The operating expenses of the Ashley Place are very high. In 2017, for example, operating expenses accounted for 85% of total revenue. Specifically, their expenditures are mainly used for employee salaries, dietary and basic utilities, which account for 34.6%, 12.7%, and 7.9% of total expenses respectively. Among them, employee wages are divided into variable wages and salaries, including the wages of all hourly workers in all departments and the fixed administrative wages and salaries composed of administrative staff’s wages. It is worth mentioning that the facility owner currently acts as the primary administrator.

In addition, property, plant, and maintenance expenses include all other supply expense categories, which are mainly room cleaning and laundry.

Demographic Analysis

Population Analysis (Age segmentation)

Lodi is also very active in the local elderly population statistics. Within a 5-mile radius around the Ashley Place, there are 5,921 residents over 75 years old, accounting for 7.3% of the total population, and there are 2,025 residents over 85 years of age, 2.5% of the population within a five-mile radius. In addition, there are a large number of adult children’s demographic information within a five-mile radius around the community, to be specific, 24.0% of the population within this distance are between 45 and 64 years old (19,556 residents). By 2022, the population of 65 and over within five miles of Ashley Place is expected to grow by 14.7%, in other words 2.7% per year; the population of 75 and over is expected to grow by 9.5%, which represents an annual growth rate of 1.8%.

Income Status

The median home value within a five-mile radius of Ashley Place is $296,165, and it is expected to increase to $332,176 in 2022. Within a five-mile radius of the community, the average annual income of all residents is $54,762. Among them, the average income of adult children

(between the ages of 45-54) is $69,724, which is expected to increase to $76,626 in five years. Within this distance, the average annual income of 65 to 74-year-olds is $55,752, which is expected to increase to $60,298 in 2022.

Customer Profile

Judy Lee: Woman over 70 years old with Alzheimer’s disease.

Judy is 74 years old and lives in Lodi. She raised three children with her husband, two sons and one daughter. Judy’s husband passed away more than 20 years ago. She has no job, so after the death of her husband, she has been living with her eldest son and helping him take care of his daughter (Judy’s granddaughter).

Judy and her family realized that her memory began to decline a few years ago, and sometimes even forgot to turn off the tap; according to the specialist’ diagnosis, Judy was suffering from Alzheimer’s disease. Judy’s children are very good and filial to her, but they are busy with work every day and do not have much time to take care of her. At the beginning of her disease, her son invited a housekeeper for Judy to take care of her daily life including cooking meals.

However, as Judy’s condition continued to deteriorate, she could not recognize the people around her ever her children. Her family is more and more aware that the home care provided by a caregiver is starting to appear unprofessional or incompetent, and it can no longer reassure children at work.

Judy’s children hope to find a community that provides memory care near their home so that they can visit their mother during the weekend. Currently, there are only 30 units for memory care in Lodi, and they are all fully occupied. Therefore, when the Ashley Place makes the conversion of 17 units to memory care, it will become Judy’s first choice.

Competitive Analysis

In Lodi, the Ashley Place has four main competitors, who are Brookdale Kettleman Lane,

Brookdale Lodi, Arbor Place Residential Care, and River Fountains of Lodi, among them,

Brookdale Kettleman Lane and Brookdale Lodi are from the same national operator Brookdale Senior Living. When pulsing the seniors housing in the Stockton area, there are also The Commons on Thornton, Wagner Heights Residential Care, Brookdale Stockton, and Rio Las Palmas. The focus of this analysis is on four facilities in the same area Lodi with the Ashley Place.

The Ashley Place is the earliest senior housing facility established in Lodi, which was established in 1976 and is operated by the local operator. One year later, a regional facility River Fountains of Lodi was established, while the other three are all running with national operator. Currently, the occupancy rate of the Ashley Place is the lowest in the local area, at only 72%. Of the five senior housing facilities, the only one Brookdale Kettleman Lane provides memory care service, others are assisted living facilities including the Ashley Place. Obviously, the rent of memory care facility is much higher than that of assisted living.

The five properties in Lodi are operated by four operators. In terms of operators’ comp share, the 104 units of the two properties operated by Brookdale Senior Living accounted for

31.2%, and the River Fountains of Lodi operated by Individual has 80 units, accounting for 24%. The 76-unit Arbor Place Residential Care operated by Covenant Care and the 73-unit The Ashley Place operated by Ilgenfritz accounted for 22.8% and 21.9%, respectively.

SWOT Analysis

Strengths

Weaknesses

The oldest one with the longest operating time, has been generally recognized by local residents.

It’s just a local brand, while the competitors are national brand or regional brand which are more likely to attract new customers.

Have the lowest price under similar living conditions.

Only has assisted living facilities, which is less competitive in the market.

Amenities and services are rich in content, beautiful environment surrounded by greenery.

There are very few parking spaces for visitors here, which may cause trouble for family

visits.

The profit margin has increased year by year.

No memory care services and activities.

Abundant infrastructure and entertainment activities.

The building is old because of the long opening years.

Each unit has private toilet and shower.

Only one building restricts activities.

Opportunities

Threats

The 17 units in the west wing can be converted into memory care, which can enhance competitiveness.

With high capital investment and slow return, it may face challenges in turnover.

Cooperate with surrounding churches and medical institutions.

The market is fierce and even cruel.

There is a big gap in the memory care market in Lodi.

The professionalism of the new memory care service may be questioned.

Cooperate with USC and other universities to carry out research and care for residents with dementia.

Competitors also have the possibility of converting to memory care and have more resources.

San Antonio TX Assisted Living Facility Project

All data, design, timeline and materials are subject to update and change

Aug, 2020

Presented by

Atlantis Senior Living

1

Summary
Project: Assisted Living and Memory Care Facility
Location: In the city of Castle Hills, enclaved by San Antonia Texas, second-most populous city in both Texas and the Southern United States, also the 7th most populous city in the US. Local market has strong unmet demands for such types of facilities.
Total investment is estimated at USD 4 million, including bank loans estimated at USD 2 million and equity investment of USD 2 million.
The investment will be used to acquire an operating assisted living and memory care facility which is not well run by a new non-profit organization and to improve its operating results.
The facility is on a 6.76 acre campus (plus an excess land of 5 acres) with total building area around 89,140 sq ft. It has 97 units, including 80 units for Assisted Living in 2 buildings and another 17 units for Memory Care in a separate building. The facility provides need-based care services to seniors providing residence, food, and activities both indoor and outdoor.
Occupancy as of end of June 2020 was 52 units (55 residents).
The acquisition is estimated to close in October 2020. In parallel to operational improvement, limited capital improvement and asset refreshing will be gradually carried out and completed in 1 year.
With conservative estimate including planning for 1-year of COVID impact, the new operation will be stabilized and sold in 5 years.
2
Confidential

Atlantis Senior Living

2

Primary Market of the Target Facility
8 minutes drive from San Antonio International Airport, bordering Uptown San Antonio, and enclaved by the second largest city by population in Texas and in southern U.S., Castle Hills is a small city with primarily single family residences.
The Project’s Primary Market Area (PMA) is within 4 miles radius from the facility. Within this PMA, in 2018, age 75+ comprises 7.6% of population (17,078) and age 85+ comprises 2.5% of population (6,285), both higher than national and state average senior concentrations.1
The primary land use in the area is single-family residential and the area is approximately 95% developed which presents a physical entry barrier to a new competitor.
The PMA is experiencing population growth and has below average income levels. The area is considered to be in a stage of growth. Between 2018 and 2023, the market area is forecast to experience growth in demand for seniors housing at an average rate relative to the nation as a whole.1
Confidential
3

Castle Hills
Source: 1. JLL Appraisal in 2018

Atlantis Senior Living

Satellite Location
Located in an established residential area, which is mostly single-family residences and 95% developed.
Confidential
4
Target

Atlantis Senior Living

Competition Analysis
The PMA had an undersupply of 469 beds of assisted living and 203 beds of memory care in 2019 per JLL’s analysis and there had been no new supply since.
Confidential
5
Although there are many assisted living facilities scattered in San Antonio area, the Target facility is the only non-residential home assisted living facility located in the city of Castle Hills and there are a small number of providers within the PMA, of which some are CCRCs which have very different customer base.
Competitors (excluding the Target) in the PMA and surrounding areas had a weighted average occupancies of 92% for ALs and 94% for MCs in 2018 per JLL. Recent competitive analysis by management companies show occupancies of high 90s to 100% with wait list. High occupancies from competitors confirm the high unmet demand in the market.
The Target facility is surrounded by residential neighborhood and there are 3 hospitals 10-minute drive away, including one transitional care hospital, which can be the feeders to the Target facility.

C
C
C
H
H
H

H
Target Facility
Hospital
C

Assisted Living & Memory Care providers
CCRC

Atlantis Senior Living

Target Facility Background
Target Facility Background
Built in 2000
97 Units including 80 Assisted Living units and 17 secured Memory Care units located in 3 buildings with a total building area of 89,140 sq ft on one campus.
The campus includes a main site on 6.76 acres of land and an excess land of 5 acres.
Currently owned and operated by a recently formed not-for-profit organization, who bought the facility as a part of a portfolio from Brookdale Senior Living in late 2018.
This is the only facility that the seller owns and manages in the state of Texas and they have not been given much attention to it. The facility does not have a dedicated web presence.

Confidential
6
The facility had 52 units occupied with 55 residents as of end of June, at a unit occupancy rate of 53.6%.
The not-for-profit organization must sell the facility quickly due to limitation in the organization’s charter, therefore is willing to accept low purchase price.
The property was appraised at $9.62 million as-is excluding the excess land in 2018 by JLL.
The property’s tax assessment value is $6.85 million.
Our purchase price is $2.75 million.

Atlantis Senior Living

Target Facility Condition
Confidential
7

Atlantis Senior Living

Capital and Operational Improvements
Upon acquisition, the facility will be managed by Imagine Senior Living, which is a co-GP of the Project. Imagine Senior Living is planning the following capital and operational improvements to the facility based on preliminary findings. As they make in-depth due diligence, the improvement plan will be refined.
Capital Improvements
Basically, in good condition, it will require new lighting, paint, some carpet, apartment make-ready, landscaping, signage, parking lot restriping, and some furniture.
Ventura Hills must be turned into a community that is more like a Country Estate than a set of facilities.
Clean, age-appropriate colors with professional design and craftsmanship that represent the area and culture of the location.
A well-maintained comfortable setting with outdoor space and exceptional landscaping. Bird feeders and lounge chairs as symbols of a life of leisure.
Operational Improvements
Revenue generation:
Implementing strategic marketing plan, lead generation, follow up and closing sales with a dedicated website and a strategic social media campaign with planned postings and updates to improve marketing and sales.
Creating a Sales Culture.
Creating one of its kind healthcare programs including a sustained Memory Care program.
Introducing Ancillary Program.
Cost savings:
Cultural change to reduce employee turnover.
Renegotiated vendor contracts to generate costing savings.
Confidential
8

Atlantis Senior Living

Operational Cash Flows
Operational Revenues
Operational revenues will include resident monthly rents, level of care fees, move-in fees, and other misc. income
The Seller’s 2020 Revenues have been between $171K and $189K per month through June 2020 and the Seller has maintained the revenues during COVID.
We anticipate that COVID may continue for a year and the revenues for the first year since taking over will be moderately increased to $195K.
After COVID, we anticipate the revenue growth will be significant. At even the local current average market occupancy rate of 84%, the monthly revenue will be around $290K.
Occupancy
We anticipate the occupancy will exceed 70% within one year after COVID, exceed 80% about 20 months after COVID.
The management company’s occupancy target will be over 92%.
Operational Expenses
Labor expenses account for about 60% of total operating expenses (excluding debt services). The management company will staff according to the level of cares. The management company has identified areas for improvements.
The management company will charge a market level management fee (5% of gross revenues) with incentive bonus for achieving high performance targets.
Overall, the management company must deliver at the minimum Net Operating Income of $600,000 and 18% margin in the 3rd year, which are very modest in the industry. However, the management company is expected to generate above 25% margin two years after COVID or $800,000+ annual NOI. A detailed management budget will be submitted by the management company and approved by us within 100 days after taking over.
Confidential
9

Atlantis Senior Living

Investment Structure
Total Investment
Acquisition price and closing costs including Asset Manager’s acquisition fee: $ 3 million
Capital Improvement investment: $ 0.4 million
Working capital plus year 1 interest reserve: $ 0.6 million
Total Investment: $ 4 million
Loans
Acquisition Loan anticipated: $2 million
We are speaking with various lenders for the best overall loan terms
Equity Investment
Total equity: $ 2 million
Asset Manager & Facility Manager (Class B Investor) 20%
Limited Investors (Class A Investor) 80%
If upon closing, the actual equity required is significantly less than initially subscribed by investors, excess of the initial capital contribution may be returned proportionally to all investors shortly after closing.
10
Confidential
Asset Manager & Facility Manager (Class B)
Limited Investors (Class A)
Special Purpose Entity
(Limited Liability Company)
Owns real estate of the facility
Receives operational revenue and pays expenses
20%
80%
Facility Management Company
“New Name”
Assisted Living and Memory Care Facility
Manages the facility through a Facility Management Contract
Employs staff

Atlantis Senior Living

Cash Flow Distributions
Investment Cash Flows
Net Operating Income (EBITDA) after paying debt services (interest and principal) and reserving for working capital will be available for distributions, subject to loan restrictions.
Asset Management Expenses
Asset Manager will charge 2% of Initial Equity Contribution by Limited Investors annually as Asset Management Fee
Professional expenses such as tax, audit, and legal related to investors will be deducted at cost (estimated $10,00 a year)
Distributions
> During the holding period:
An annual 9% preferred return will first either be paid (if there is sufficient new cash flow) or accrued pari passu to all Class A and Class B investors.
Excess distributable cash flows above the 9% preferred return will be distributed 20% to Asset Manager (Class B) as Asset Manager’s Promote / Carrie, and 80% to all Class A and Class B investors pari passu.
> Upon exit sale, net proceeds from the sale of the asset after paying back loan balance will be distributed in the following order, to the extend of the available cash
All Class A and Class B investors will first receive any accrued and unpaid Preferred Return, pari passu
All Class A and Class B investors will then receive return of its investment, pari passu
Excess cash will be distributed 20% to Asset Manager and Facility Manager (Class B) as their Promote / Carrie, then 80% to all Class A and Class B investors pari passu.
11
Confidential

Atlantis Senior Living

Exit Sale and Returns
After the facility reaches stabilized financial performance, it can be sold on the market.
This is our preferred exit strategy. There is an active market for cash flowing senior housing with buyers including REITs, PE funds, and other institutional investors.
Conservatively, we anticipate that the facility will have a strong trailing 12-month performance starting the 4th year when we can put the facility on the market.
Alternatively, investors may achieve partial capital refund and cash out through refinance
with a fixed term commercial loan provided by commercial banks or FNMA or with a HUD insured loan at a low and fixed interest rate for 30-35 years.
After refinance cash out, investors will continue to enjoy cash flows from the facility.
Economics
Cash yields during the holding period (including 1-year COVID impact) assuming no refinance

Upon exit by the end of year 5 (if COVID impact lasts 1 year after taking over), the market value of the facility will exceed $ 6.5 million with a target value of $ 9 million or higher.
Market capitalization rate in 2019 had reached a record low, pushing asset price to record high1. Even at 9% exit cap rate, which would be the worst annual average for B Class AL/MC since first tracked in 2012, its market value will exceed $9 million at our expected $800K+ EBITDA level. At $ 600K minimum EBITDA, the market value will exceed $6.5 million.
At $9 million, our facility’s price per unit would be only $ 93K, still below historical average for B Class properties.
Limited investors’ exit multiple over investment will be 2x in the conservative Base Scenario. We target our exit multiple of over 3x.
Investor IRR upon Exit is conservatively estimated to be 20%+. Significant higher yields and exit IRR are targeted.
Confidential
12
Limited Investors Cash on Equity Yield
Year 1 2 3 4 5
In Conservative Base Scenario 0% 0% 15%+ 15%+ 15%+

Source:1. The Senior Care Acquisition Report 2020
Note: The cash yields and IRR estimates are subject to change without notice.

Atlantis Senior Living

Management Teams
Asset Manager:
Atlantis Senior Living
Experienced with senior housing portfolio purchase and asset management for institutional investors.
Experienced in buying, developing, and turning around standalone facilities for individual investors.
One of the first to introduce U.S. senior housing operational models to Chinese insurance companies and regulators.
Managing Partner having over 20 years successful track record in managing and turning around senior living facilities in the U.S.
A licensed Nursing Home Administrator, Licensed Assisted Living Administrator, Licensed Preceptor within California which means he has the state authorization to train future Nursing Home Administrators. Teaching senior living facility management at University of Southern California.
Facility Management:
Imagine Senior Living (https://imagineseniorlivingllc.com/)
Also will be an owner of the Property entity;
Providing facility management through a Management Contract with the Property entity with performance requirements and incentives;
Key leaders with years of hands-on operational and marketing experience at major senior living management companies both locally and regionally and with successful marketing, operation improvements and turned-around track records.
13
Confidential

Atlantis Senior Living

Estimated Timelines
8/2020 Imagine signed the Asset Purchase and Sale Agreement (APSA) with the seller and Atlantis Signed the Collaboration Agreement with Imagine to jointly own the property.
Site visit and starting 45-day Due Diligence, including obtaining 3rd party appraisals, Property Condition Reports, Survey, Zoning Report, Phase I Environmental Report, Title Research and Title Insurance
Investors subscription start
Secure lenders and obtain loan term sheets
9/2020 Imagine obtain operating license
10/1/2020 Transaction and loan close simultaneously upon satisfaction of DD result
10/2020 Start capital improvement
Start marketing and operating improvement
2/2021 Imagine to provide detailed operating budget to be approved by Atlantis
Mid 2025 Start exit sale
2026 Complete exit
14
Confidential

Atlantis Senior Living

Risks and Mitigation
Risks
COVID-19 risk

Lease up risk

Operating License delay

Legal risks

Property loss risks
Operating expense overrun

Exit sale risks
Mitigation
Nationwide, COVID-19 had temporarily stalled new residents moving in at assisted living facilities. However, we have seen demands picking up again as many families are not able to taking care of their seniors at home.
Both our other facilities and the seller have been maintaining the occupancy during COVID-19.
However, we are still budgeting for 12 months additional COVID-19 impact in our baseline forecast.
Current owner has been able to maintain its occupancy even without any recognizable internet presence and marketing effort.
The local facility management company has a strong marketing focus and track records.
Target lease up budget for management is higher than baseline forecast with strong performance based incentives.
Local market has strong demand for Independent Living as well, which could be a back up plan if the assisted living demand doesn’t fill up the facility.
Special consultant will be hired to apply for operating license during Due Diligence period with an estimated approval before acquisition closing.
Interim management contract can be amended if need with current owner to allow continuous operation licensure while under our operational supervision and to allow immediate capital improvement and marketing.
Liability insurance will be purchased upon Closing to cover potential legal liabilities
All staff is employed under the Facility Management so minimize operational risk.
Property insurance will be purchased upon Closing to cover most property damage losses
Management is incentivized to increase margin. Baseline assumptions are already at the lower end of the industry margin range.
Our total investment per unit is less than 1/2 or 1/3 of the average per unit sold price of ALF sales in the region, so there is significant room for upside.
In case the market condition is not good for sale, we can refinance with a permanent loan to achieve partial cash out while investors can continue to enjoy cash yield.
Confidential
15

Atlantis Senior Living

V E N T U R A H I L L S S E N I O R L I V I N G
1 2 0 7 J A C K S O N K E L L E R R O A D
S A N A N T O N I O , T E X A S 7 8 2 1 3
C B R E G R O U P , I N C . F I L E : 2 0 – 9 0 1 M A – 0 5 7 4 – 1

T H E B A N K O F S A N A N T O N I O
CBRE VALUATION & ADVISORY SERVICES

APPRAISAL REPORT
© 2020 CBRE, Inc.

V A L U A T I O N & A D V I S O R Y S E R V I C E S

Seniors Housing & Healthcare
www.cbre.com/shvas
Date of Report: October 2, 2020

Daniel Partida
Credit Analyst II
THE BANK OF SAN ANTONIO
1900 NW Loop 410
San Antonio, TX 78213

RE: Appraisal of:
Ventura Hills Senior Living
1207 Jackson Keller Road,
San Antonio, Texas 78213
CBRE File: 20-901MA-0574-1

Dear Mr. Partida:
At your request and authorization, CBRE, Inc. has prepared an appraisal of the market value of the
referenced property. This analysis is presented in the following appraisal report.
The subject, identified as Ventura Hills Senior Living, is an existing assisted living residence located at
1207 Jackson Keller Road, San Antonio, Bexar County, Texas. The 73,917 square foot improvements
are situated on a 6.14-acre site. The improvements were constructed in 1999 and have a total of 97
physical units with a unit mix of 80 assisted living unit and 17 memory care units. The subject has a
total operating capacity of 97 revenue units (beds), while the licensed capacity is 160 Type A assisted
living beds and 31 Type B assisted living beds. As the subject’s operating capacity falls below the
licensed capacity, any licensed capacity that exceeds the operating capacity may be utilized for
second persons or additional companion units. As will be discussed within this report, revenue units
are based on the operating capacity.
The subject also contains approximately 5.62 acres of excess land. Two buildings totaling 14,924
square feet are located on the excess land that were previously used as office space and dormitory-
type housing, but are in poor condition and are not usable. These buildings are not being utilized
currently and have no contributory value.
The subject is currently owned by Eagle Senior Living and operated by its internal management arm,
Greenbrier Senior Living. Eagle Senior Living is a non-profit community that purchased the subject in
December 2018 as part of a 17-property portfolio of former Brookdale Senior Living properties. The
purchase price of all 17 assets was reported to be $224,500,000; however, an allocated purchase
price to the subject was not available. The subject is the only property in Texas that is owned and
operated by Eagle Senior Living, and has been operated at a loss since the time of sale. As Eagle
Senior Living is a non-profit provider, they have been required by its board to dispose of the subject.
The subject was listed for sale by JLL at $2,750,000, which is the agreed purchase price per the sale
agreement dated July 28, 2020 between the buyer, Imagine Senior Living, LLC and the seller, Eagle
Senior Living. Given our As Is value conclusion, the purchase price is below market value as the seller
was motivated and in need of selling expeditiously.
© 2020 CBRE, Inc.

Daniel Partida
Date of Report: October 2, 2020
Page 2

The buyer will place its affiliated operator, Atlantis Senior Living, as management of the subject post
sale. The principle of Atlantis Senior Living, James and Suzanne Denny, are experienced operators of
seniors housing communities. Notably, market value is predicated on competent management.
In August 2020, following the signing of the purchase agreement, one of the subject’s buildings, a
two-story structure that houses 34 assisted living units, suffered extensive water damage from a leak in
the water suppression system. According to the buyer, the total dollar amount of the damage is
unknown, but it could range between $1,200,000 to $1,400,000, depending on what the final
insurance claim will be. The work to completely rehab the building is already underway and insurance
is covering all costs for the damage. It is an extraordinary assumption that the insurance claim will
cover all damage associated, and that the subject will receive all necessary approvals and permits to
operate the building as an assisted living community. Also, per the scope of this assignment, it is a
hypothetical condition that all repairs have been made as of the effective date.
The buyer also plans to renovate and upgrade the other buildings, including upgrading the lighting,
PTAC units, flooring, signage, landscaping, and upgrading the phone and security system. The total
capex for these upgrades, which are above and beyond the repairs associated with the water damage,
total $300,313 according to the buyer. We have assumed a 10% profit on the cost to complete,
bringing the total cost to complete to $330,344. This total cost has been deducted from the As
Complete value to arrive at the As Is value conclusion.
The subject has not been efficiently managed by the current owner/operator, and has operated with
an occupancy level well below market levels. Since February 2019, the earliest reporting period
available following the sale in late 2018, the overall occupancy has averaged 51.0%.
As of the effective date of this report, the nation, region, and market area are impacted by the
outbreak of the Novel Coronavirus (COVID-19/COVID), declared by the World Health Organization
as a “Global Pandemic” on March 11, 2020. In consideration of the effects of COVID-19 on the
subject’s operations, as part of this assignment, we reviewed and analyzed census activity since March
2020, as well as adjustments to operating expenses and capital markets assumptions. Furthermore, as
discussed throughout this report, projections for the projected term (i.e. near, mid, or long-term) of
impact on the subject’s operations was incorporated within the conclusions. The following bullets
summarize notable operating datapoints at the subject since March 2020:
Operation Trend Summary:
• The subject has not been impacted in its census by COVID, as occupancy fluctuated between
53.0% and 55.0% between March and August 2020
• As of the effective date, the occupancy was 51.5%
• Operating expenses were elevated in recent months based on increased payroll, PPE costs,
and sanitation; however, the operator was unable to break out the exact increases
• Both changes in occupancy and expenses have been more fully discussed within the body of
this report.
The subject is operating below stabilized levels with an occupancy of 52% at the time of inspection.
Based on a construction period of 2 months, our As Complete date of value is November 22, 2020.
Additionally, we have projected a stabilized occupancy of 90.0%, after an estimated absorption
period of 24 months, resulting in an As Stabilized date of value of November 22, 2022. Note that
while the As Complete and As Stabilized value scenarios are based on prospective dates, the value
conclusions are stated in current dollar figures.
© 2020 CBRE, Inc.

Daniel Partida
Date of Report: October 2, 2020
Page 3

Based on the analysis contained in the following report, the market value(s) of the subject is concluded
as follows:
MARKET VALUE CONCLUSION
Appraisal Premise Interest Appraised Date of Value Value Conclusion
As Is – Going Concern Fee Simple Estate September 22, 2020 $4,960,000
As Stabilized – Going Concern Fee Simple Estate November 22, 2022 $7,000,000
Excess Land Value Fee Simple Estate September 22, 2020 $1,600,000
Compiled by CBRE

Allocation of the Going Concern
The allocation of the going concern has been estimated as follows:
As Is As Complete As Stabilized
September 22, 2020 November 22, 2020 November 22, 2022
Real Estate $4,414,000 $4,662,363 $5,180,406
FF & E $546,000 $546,000 $546,000
Business Value $0 $81,637 $1,273,594
Market Value of the Going Concern $4,960,000 $5,290,000 $7,000,000
Compiled by CBRE
ALLOCATION OF THE GOING CONCERN

The report, in its entirety, including all assumptions and limiting conditions, is an integral part of, and
inseparable from, this letter.
The following appraisal sets forth the most pertinent data gathered, the techniques employed, and the
reasoning leading to the opinion of value. The analyses, opinions and conclusions were developed
based on, and this report has been prepared in conformance with, the guidelines and
recommendations set forth in the Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice (USPAP), and
the requirements of the Code of Professional Ethics and Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice
of the Appraisal Institute. It also conforms to Title XI Regulations and the Financial Institutions Reform,
Recovery, and Enforcement Act of 1989 (FIRREA) updated in 1994 and further updated by the
Interagency Appraisal and Evaluation Guidelines promulgated in 2010.
The intended use and user of our report are specifically identified in our report as agreed upon in our
contract for services and/or reliance language found in the report. As a condition to being granted
the status of an intended user, any intended user who has not entered into a written agreement with
CBRE in connection with its use of our report agrees to be bound by the terms and conditions of the
agreement between CBRE and the client who ordered the report. No other use or user of the report is
permitted by any other party for any other purpose. Dissemination of this report by any party to any
non-intended users does not extend reliance to any such party, and CBRE will not be responsible for
any unauthorized use of or reliance upon the report, its conclusions or contents (or any portion
thereof).
© 2020 CBRE, Inc.

Daniel Partida
Date of Report: October 2, 2020
Page 4

It has been a pleasure to assist you in this assignment. If you have any questions concerning the
analysis, or if CBRE, Inc. can be of further service, please contact us.
Respectfully submitted,

CBRE, Inc. – VALUATION & ADVISORY SERVICES

Andy Kepchar, MAI Malcolm Coleman, MAI, AI-GRS, MRICS
Vice President Managing Director
Cert. Gen. Appraiser Lic. #1380208G Cert. Gen. Appraiser Lic. #1335110G
Phone: 210 253 6005 Phone: 210 580 8083
Email: Andy.Kepchar@cbre.com Email: Malcolm.Coleman@cbre.com
© 2020 CBRE, Inc.

Certification
i

Certification
We certify to the best of our knowledge and belief:
1. The statements of fact contained in this report are true and correct.
2. The reported analyses, opinions, and conclusions are limited only by the reported assumptions and limiting
conditions and are our personal, impartial and unbiased professional analyses, opinions, and conclusions.
3. We have no present or prospective interest in or bias with respect to the property that is the subject of this
report and have no personal interest in or bias with respect to the parties involved with this assignment.
4. Our engagement in this assignment was not contingent upon developing or reporting predetermined results.
5. Our compensation for completing this assignment is not contingent upon the development or reporting of a
predetermined value or direction in value that favors the cause of the client, the amount of the value
opinion, the attainment of a stipulated result, or the occurrence of a subsequent event directly related to the
intended use of this appraisal.
6. Our analyses, opinions, and conclusions were developed, and this report has been prepared, in conformity
with the Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice, as well as the requirements of the State of
Texas.
7. The reported analyses, opinions, and conclusions were developed, and this report has been prepared, in
conformity with the requirements of the Code of Professional Ethics and Standards of Professional Appraisal
Practice of the Appraisal Institute.
8. The use of this report is subject to the requirements of the Appraisal Institute relating to review by its duly
authorized representatives.
9. As of the date of this report, Andy Kepchar, MAI and Malcolm Coleman, MAI, AI-GRS, MRICS have
completed the continuing education program of the Appraisal Institute for Designated Members.
10. Andy Kepchar, MAI has and Malcolm Coleman, MAI, AI-GRS, MRICS has not made a personal
inspection of the property that is the subject of this report.
11. No one provided significant real property appraisal assistance to the persons signing this report.
12. Valuation & Advisory Services operates as an independent economic entity within CBRE, Inc. Although
employees of other CBRE, Inc. divisions may be contacted as a part of our routine market research
investigations, absolute client confidentiality and privacy were maintained at all times with regard to this
assignment without conflict of interest.
13. Andy Kepchar, MAI and Malcolm Coleman, MAI, AI-GRS, MRICS have not provided any services, as an
appraiser or in any other capacity, regarding the property that is the subject of this report within the three-
year period immediately preceding agreement to perform this assignment.

Andy Kepchar, MAI Malcolm Coleman, MAI, AI-GRS, MRICS
Cert. Gen. Appraiser Lic. #1380208G Cert. Gen. Appraiser Lic. #1335110G
© 2020 CBRE, Inc.

Subject Photographs
ii

Subject Photographs

AERIAL VIEW Source: Google Maps

FRONT VIEW
Subject
Excess Land
© 2020 CBRE, Inc.

Subject Photographs
iii

Front Entrance Side View

View of AL Building Under Renovation Rear View

Excess Land Retaining Wall
© 2020 CBRE, Inc.

Subject Photographs
iv

Vacant Building on Excess Land Vacant Building on Excess Land

Typical Hallway Dining Room

Coffee Area Kitchen
© 2020 CBRE, Inc.

Subject Photographs
v

Private Dining/Meeting Room Common Area

Typical AL Unit Typical Resident Unit Bathroom

Street Scene Facing Southeast Street Scene Facing Northwest
© 2020 CBRE, Inc.

Executive Summary
vi

Executive Summary
Property Name Ventura Hills Senior Living
Management Company Eagle Senior Living
Location
Assessor’s Parcel Number 348290
Property Rights Appraised Fee Simple Estate
Highest and Best Use
As If Vacant Seniors Housing
As Improved Seniors Housing
Land Area (Improved) 6.14 AC
Excess Land Area 5.62 AC
Improvements
Property Type Assisted Living Residence (ALR)
Number of Buildings 5
Number of Stories 2
Gross Building Area 73,917 SF
Year Built 1999
Condition Average
Total Units 97
Total Beds 97
Total Revenue Units 97
Estimated Exposure / Marketing Time 10 Months / 10 to 15 Months
Financial Indicators
Current Occupancy 51.5%
Stabilized Occupancy 90.0%
Estimated Lease-up Period 24 Months
Overall Capitalization Rate 7.75%
Discount Rate 9.75%
Terminal Capitalization Rate 8.25%
Stabilized Operating Data Total Rev. Unit Per RD
Effective Gross Income $3,502,576 $36,109 $109.92
Operating Expenses $2,960,577 $30,521 $92.91
Net Operating Income $542,000 $5,588 $17.01
Expense Ratio 84.53%
1207 Jackson Keller Road, San Antonio,
Bexar County, Texas 78213

© 2020 CBRE, Inc.

Executive Summary
vii

VALUATION SUMMARY Total Rev. Unit
Market Value As Is On September 22, 2020
Excess Land Value $1,520,000
Market Value As Is On September 22, 2020
Sales Comparison Approach $5,250,000 $54,124
Income Capitalization Approach $4,960,000 $51,134
Market Value As Complete On November 22, 2020
Sales Comparison Approach $5,580,000 $57,526
Income Capitalization Approach $5,290,000 $54,536
Market Value As Stabilized On November 22, 2022
Sales Comparison Approach $7,300,000 $75,258
Income Capitalization Approach $7,000,000 $72,165
Insurable Value (Replacement Cost) $6,600,000 $68,041
CONCLUDED MARKET VALUE
Appraisal Premise Interest Appraised Value
As Is – Going Concern Fee Simple Estate $4,960,000
As Complete – Going Concern Fee Simple Estate $5,290,000
As Stabilized – Going Concern Fee Simple Estate $7,000,000
Excess Land Value Fee Simple Estate $1,520,000
Compiled by CBRE
September 22, 2020
November 22, 2020
November 22, 2022
Date of Value
September 22, 2020

Allocation of the Going Concern
The allocation of the going concern has been estimated as follows:
As Is As Complete As Stabilized
September 22, 2020 November 22, 2020 November 22, 2022
Real Estate $4,414,000 $4,662,363 $5,180,406
FF & E $546,000 $546,000 $546,000
Business Value $0 $81,637 $1,273,594
Market Value of the Going Concern $4,960,000 $5,290,000 $7,000,000
Compiled by CBRE
ALLOCATION OF THE GOING CONCERN

© 2020 CBRE, Inc.

Executive Summary
viii

Extraordinary Assumptions
An extraordinary assumption is defined as “an assignment-specific assumption as of the effective date
regarding uncertain information used in an analysis which, if found to be false, could alter the
appraiser’s opinions or conclusions.” 1
• Under the As Complete and As Stabilized scenarios, our analysis makes the extraordinary
assumption that the proposed renovations will be completed of similar quality and within the
development timeline and budget, similar to the description within this report. The use of this
extraordinary assumption may have affected the assignment results.

• In response to the COVID-19 Pandemic, in an effort to protect the resident population within the
subject property, and with the Client permission, the CBRE inspection included an exterior only
physical inspection of the subject property. The interior description of the subject is based on
resources as described within the Improvements Analysis section of this report, and it is considered
to sufficiently describe the subject in which to result in credible assignment conclusions. As such,
we make the extraordinary assumption that the interior of the subject improvements is of similar
condition and quality to the description within this report, and that there are not items of
significant deferred maintenance. The use of this extraordinary assumption may have affected the
assignment results.

Hypothetical Conditions
A hypothetical condition is defined as “a condition, directly related to a specific assignment, which is
contrary to what is known by the appraiser to exist on the effective date of the assignment results but is
used for the purposes of analysis.” 2
• It is a hypothetical condition that all renovations from the water damage have been made as of
the effective date.

1 The Appraisal Foundation, USPAP, 2020-2021
2 The Appraisal Foundation, USPAP, 2020-2021
© 2020 CBRE, Inc.

Table of Contents
ix

Table of Contents
Certification ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. i
Subject Photographs ……………………………………………………………………………………………………. ii
Executive Summary …………………………………………………………………………………………………….. vi
Table of Contents ………………………………………………………………………………………………………. ix
Introduction ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. 1
Seniors Housing Industry Overview …………………………………………………………………………………. 5
Area Analysis …………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. 2
Neighborhood Analysis ……………………………………………………………………………………………….. 5
Market Analysis …………………………………………………………………………………………………………. 8
Site Analysis ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………. 33
Improvement Analysis ………………………………………………………………………………………………… 38
Zoning …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… 45
Tax and Assessment Data …………………………………………………………………………………………… 46
Highest and Best Use ………………………………………………………………………………………………… 48
Appraisal Methodology ……………………………………………………………………………………………… 50
Excess Land Value …………………………………………………………………………………………………….. 51
Insurable Value (Replacement Cost) ………………………………………………………………………………. 55
Sales Comparison Approach ……………………………………………………………………………………….. 57
Income Capitalization Approach ………………………………………………………………………………….. 64
Cost to Achieve Stabilized Operations …………………………………………………………………………… 97
Reconciliation of Value …………………………………………………………………………………………….. 101
Allocation of the Going Concern ………………………………………………………………………………… 102
Assumptions and Limiting Conditions …………………………………………………………………………… 109
Addenda
A Comparable Data Sheets
B Operating Data
C Legal Description
D Senior Life Report
E Client Contract Information
F Appraiser Qualifications
G CBRE Specialty Practice Brochure
© 2020 CBRE, Inc.

Introduction
1

Introduction
Property Identification
• Community Name: Ventura Hills Senior Living
• Community Use: Assisted Living Residence (ALR)
• Physical Address: 1207 Jackson Keller Road, San Antonio, Bexar County, Texas
Primary Unit of Measure
The breakdown of the subject property as it relates to the set-up of units, beds, and most appropriate
unit of measurement (revenue units) is shown below. Throughout this report, the term “unit” is
intended to represent the “revenue unit” unless otherwise noted.
Units Beds
Unit of
Measure
Revenue
Units
Assisted Living 80 80 Beds 80
Memory Care 17 17 Beds 17
Total 97 97 97
PRIMARY UNIT OF MEASURE

Ownership and Property History
The following table summarizes the subject’s ownership history.
OWNERSHIP SUMMARY
Current Owner: American Eagle Castle Hills LLC
Date Purchased: December 20, 2018
Purchase Price: N/Av. – Portfolio Sale, See Comments
Legal Reference: 20180248750
Pending Sale: Yes
Three-year Ownership Change, Listing, or Offer: See Comments
Compiled by CBRE
The subject is currently owned by Eagle Senior Living and operated by its internal management arm,
Greenbrier Senior Living. Eagle Senior Living is a non-profit community that purchased the subject in
December 2018 as part of a 17-property portfolio of former Brookdale Senior Living properties. The
purchase price of all 17 assets was reported to be $224,500,000; however, an allocated purchase
price to the subject was not available. The subject is the only property in Texas that is owned and
operated by Eagle Senior Living, and has been operated at a loss since the time of sale. As Eagle
Senior Living is a non-profit provider, they have been required by its board to dispose of the subject.
The subject was listed for sale by JLL at $2,750,000, which is the agreed purchase price per the sale
agreement dated July 28, 2020 between the buyer, Imagine Senior Living, LLC and the seller, Eagle
© 2020 CBRE, Inc.

Introduction
2

Senior Living. Given our As Is value conclusion, the purchase price is below market value as the seller
was motivated and in need of selling expeditiously.
We are not aware of any other sales during the prior three years or listing for sales regarding the
subject.
Premise of the Appraisal
The following table illustrates the various dates associated with the valuation of the subject, the
valuation premise(s) and the rights appraised for each premise/date:
PREMISE OF THE APPRAISAL
Item Date Interest Appraised
Date of Report: October 2, 2020
Date of Inspection: September 22, 2020
Dates of Value
As Is – Going Concern September 22, 2020 Fee Simple Estate
As Stabilized – Going Concern November 22, 2022 Fee Simple Estate
Compiled by CBRE

Purpose of the Appraisal
The purpose of this appraisal is to estimate the market value of the subject property.
Definition of Value
The current economic definition of market value agreed upon by agencies that regulate federal
financial institutions in the U.S. (and used herein) is as follows:
The most probable price which a property should bring in a competitive and open market under all
conditions requisite to a fair sale, the buyer and seller each acting prudently and knowledgeably, and
assuming the price is not affected by undue stimulus. Implicit in this definition is the consummation of
a sale as of a specified date and the passing of title from seller to buyer under conditions whereby:
1. buyer and seller are typically motivated;
2. both parties are well informed or well advised, and acting in what they consider their own best
interests;
3. a reasonable time is allowed for exposure in the open market;
4. payment is made in terms of cash in U.S. dollars or in terms of financial arrangements
comparable thereto; and
5. the price represents the normal consideration for the property sold unaffected by special or
creative financing or sales concessions granted by anyone associated with the sale. 3

3 Interagency Appraisal and Evaluation Guidelines; December 10, 2010, Federal Register, Volume 75 Number 237, Page
77472.
© 2020 CBRE, Inc.

Introduction
3

Intended Use of Report
This appraisal is to be used for a new loan, and no other use is permitted.
Intended User of Report
This appraisal is to be used by The Bank of San Antonio, and no other user may rely on our report
unless as specifically indicated in the report.
Intended Users – the intended user is the person (or entity) who the appraiser intends will
use the results of the appraisal. The client may provide the appraiser with information
about other potential users of the appraisal, but the appraiser ultimately determines who
the appropriate users are given the appraisal problem to be solved. Identifying the
intended users is necessary so that the appraiser can report the opinions and conclusions
developed in the appraisal in a manner that is clear and understandable to the intended
users. Parties who receive or might receive a copy of the appraisal are not necessarily
intended users. The appraiser’s responsibility is to the intended users identified in the
report, not to all readers of the appraisal report. 4
Scope of Work
The scope of the assignment relates to the extent and manner in which research is conducted, data is
gathered and analysis is applied. CBRE, Inc. completed the following steps for this assignment:
• Client
• Intended use
• Intended user
• Type of opinion
• Effective date of opinion
• Relevant characteristics about the subject
• Assignment conditions
Extent to Which the Property was Inspected
In response to the COVID-19 Pandemic, in an effort to protect the resident population within the
subject property, and with the Client permission, the CBRE inspection included an exterior only
physical inspection of the subject property. The interior description of the subject is based on resources
as described within the Improvements Analysis section of this report, and it is considered to provide a
description of the subject interior in which to sufficiently provide credible assignment conclusions. The
buyer provided photos of the interior of the subject’s improvements.
This inspection sample was considered an adequate representation of the subject property and is the
basis for our findings.

4 Appraisal Institute, The Appraisal of Real Estate, 14th ed. (Chicago: Appraisal Institute, 2013), 50.
© 2020 CBRE, Inc.

Introduction
4

Type and Extent of the Data Researched
CBRE, Inc. reviewed the micro and macro market environments with respect to physical and economic
factors relevant to the valuation process. This process included interviews with regional and local
market participants, available published data, and other various resources. CBRE, Inc. also conducted
regional and local research with respect to the following:
• applicable tax data
• zoning requirements
• flood zone status
• demographics
• income and expense data
• comparable data
Type and Extent of Analysis Applied
CBRE, Inc. analyzed the data gathered through the use of appropriate and accepted appraisal
methodology to arrive at a probable value indication via each applicable approach to value. The
steps required to complete each approach are discussed in the methodology section.
Data Resources Utilized in the Analysis
DATA SOURCES
Item Source(s):
Site Data
Size: ALTA Survey
Improved Data
Gross Size/GBA: Bexar County Appraisal District
Total Rev. Units & Mix: Rent Roll
Area Breakdown/Use: Floor Plans
No. Bldgs.: Site Plan and Physical Inspection
Parking Spaces: Site Plan
YOC: Bexar County Appraisal District
Economic Data
Deferred Maintenance: Provided by Buyer
Building Costs: N/A
Income Data: Subject Financials and Market Extracted Data
Expense Data: Subject Financials and Market Extracted Data
Other
Licensure Requirements: ASHA State Regulatory Handbook/ State Regulatory Agency
Compiled by CBRE

© 2020 CBRE, Inc.

Introduction
5

Seniors Housing Industry Overview
The seniors housing and care industry provides accommodation, an array of services, and healthcare
options to the senior population. The level of services and variety of options available to the seniors
housing marketplace continues to evolve as the needs, preferences and demands of seniors and their
families change.
Seniors housing and care properties are divided into four primary categories: independent living (“IL”),
assisted living (“AL”), memory care (“MC”) and nursing care (“NC”). Seniors housing and care also
include continuing care retirement communities (“CCRCs”), which typically offer all care levels noted
on a single campus.
Property Types by Services Provided
The following classifications have been endorsed by LeadingAge; American Health Care Association
(AHCA); American Seniors Housing Association (ASHA); Argentum; and the National Investment
Center for the Seniors Housing & Care Industry, Inc. (NIC).
Senior Apartments (55+) and Active Adult Communities: Senior apartments or 55+ communities
include for-sale single-family homes, townhomes, mobile homes, condominiums, or rental apartments
with no specialized services. These properties are restricted to adults at least 55 years of age or older
who generally lead independent lifestyles. These communities may include amenities such as a
clubhouse, golf course and recreational spaces. Outdoor maintenance is normally included in the
homeowner’s association or condominium fee. These properties do not have a commercial kitchen and
generally do not provide meals or other services to residents.
Active adult communities are multifamily properties catering to the more lifestyle focused senior.
Amenities, building design, and services offered are similar to independent living. However, services
are afforded at the request of the resident. While these properties do not have commercial kitchens,
they may have the build-out to fit a commercial kitchen. Meals, activities, and transportation are not
included in the monthly rent, but can be arranged through the on-site concierge. Activities of daily
living (ADL) services may also be provided through third-party home care providers.
Independent Living Communities (ILC): Independent living communities are typically offered as rental
properties that provide residents access to meals and other services such as housekeeping, linen
service, transportation, beauty salon/ barber shop, and social or recreational activities, as part of their
monthly fees. Such properties do not provide assistance with ADLs, such as supervision of medication,
bathing, dressing, toileting, etc. Residents of independent units may have some home health care
services provided by in-house staff or an outside agency. Licensure requirements typically do not apply.
Assisted Living Residences (ALR): Assisted living residences are state regulated properties that provide
similar services and amenities as independent living communities and provide supportive care from
© 2020 CBRE, Inc.

http://www.nic.org/research/classifications.aspx

http://www.nic.org/research/classifications.aspx

Introduction
6

trained employees to residents who are unable to live independently and require assistance with
activities of daily living including management of medications, bathing, dressing, toileting, ambulating
and eating. Many assisted living properties include wings or floors dedicated to residents with
Alzheimer’s or other forms of dementia.
An assisted living property can also specialize exclusively in memory care. These properties are
identified as a memory care residence and have 24-hour support with more structured activities to
ensure safety and quality of life by trained staff members. Most of these living environments are fully
secured with locked areas and allow access to outdoor walking paths or gardens. A memory care
residence is a subset of assisted living.
Nursing Care: Nursing care properties are also referred to as skilled nursing facilities (SNF) with the
most need driven demand segment. These properties are the most care intensive and highly regulated
segment of the seniors housing and healthcare sector. Most individuals require 24-hour nursing and
medical care. In most cases, these properties are licensed for Medicaid and Medicare reimbursement.
Nursing care properties fall into two categories; Long Term Care and Post-Acute Care. Medicaid
typically is the largest payor source of long-term care properties while Medicare is the largest payor
source for post-acute care properties.
Continuing Care Retirement Community (CCRCs): Continuing care retirement communities (also
referred to as life-care communities) provide independent living, assisted living, and skilled nursing
options on a single campus, typically within different buildings. This arrangement allows older adults to
remain in the same community with the same provider, even if their future care needs change (age-in-
place). Modern CCRCs tend to target an independent living customer seeking hospitality style
amenities and services with the security of knowing that future care needs will be met. Resident
payment plans vary and include entrance fee, condo/coop and rental programs.

Shelter Activities
Transport,
Laundry
Meals
Basic Care
Services
ADL Care
Services
Specialized
MC
Long-Term
Chonic Care
55+
IL
AL
MC
NC
Source: NIC Investment Guide
Real Estate Component Services Component
Real Estate Component Services Component
Real Estate Component
Real Estate Component Services Component
Real Estate Component Services Component

© 2020 CBRE, Inc.

Introduction
7

Asset Components
Seniors housing and care properties are encumbered by businesses that require a specific mix of
tangible and intangible assets to operate effectively. The tangible or real property assets, including the
land, improvements, furniture, fixtures and equipment, are obvious components of a seniors housing
and care property. Unlike other forms of income producing commercial real estate, a meaningful
component of value relates to intangible assets. The intangible components are summarized below.
Tangible Assets Intangible Assets
Furniture, Fixtures & Equipment Operating Policies & Procedures
Building Envelope Brand
HVAC & Mechanical Systems Assembled Workforce
Elevator(s) Market Relationships
Land License*
*Federal, state, and local
ASSET COMPONENTS

The seniors housing and care business model is more involved making property operations an
essential component of value. This ‘active management’ component is correctly viewed by the market
as adding incremental risk and complexity versus the conventional commercial real estate asset
classes, which translates into higher return expectations by investors.
© 2020 CBRE, Inc.

Introduction
1

Exposure/Marketing Time
Appraisal guidelines require a reasonable time-period estimate in which the subject could be brought
to market and sold. This timeframe can either be examined historically or prospectively. In a historical
analysis, this is referred to as exposure time. Exposure time always precedes the date of value, with the
underlying premise being the time a property would have been on the market prior to the date of
value, such that it would sell at its appraised value as of the valuation date. On a prospective basis,
the term marketing time is most often used. The marketing time is a function of price, time, and use. It
is not an isolated estimate of time alone.
In consideration of these factors, we have analyzed exposure periods for comparable sales included
within the CBRE VIEW database, as well as exposure/ marketing time information via the CBRE, Inc.
National Investor Survey. The following table summarizes information derived from these sources.
EXPOSURE/MARKETING TIME INFORMATION
Exposure/Mktg. (Months)
Investment Type Range Average
CBRE Seniors Housing & Care
Core Assets 8.0 – 10.0 9.0
Non-Core Assets 10.0 – 15.0 12.0
CBRE Exposure Time Estimate
CBRE Marketing Time Estimate
Source: CBRE Investor Survey
10 to 15 Months
10 Months

As will be discussed within the Market Analysis section, Current Market Conditions – COVID-19
subsection, of this report, the current impact of the COVID-19 is extending marketing efforts. Current
headwinds on marketing of seniors housing assets include limited access community, reducing the
ability for property tours and collection of on-site due diligence. Current sentiment from market
participants is that these conditions will extend marketing periods by an estimated 60 to 90 days.

© 2020 CBRE, Inc.

Area & Neighborhood Analysis
2

Area Analysis

The dynamic nature of economic relationships within a market area has a direct bearing on real
estate values and the long-term quality of a real estate investment. The value of a property is not
based on the price paid for it in the past or the cost of its creation, but on what buyers and sellers
perceive it will provide in the future. Consequently, the attitude of the market toward a property within
a specific neighborhood or market area reflects the probable future trend of that area.
© 2020 CBRE, Inc.

Area & Neighborhood Analysis
3

Regional Overview
POPULATION
The subject is located in the San Antonio-New Braunfels, TX Metropolitan Statistical Area. Key
information about the area is provided in the following tables.
The area has a population of 2,570,955 and
a median age of 36, with the largest
population group in the 20-29 age range and
the smallest population in 80+ age range.
Population has increased by 428,447 since
2010, reflecting an annual increase of 1.8%.
Population is projected to increase by 217,335
by 2025, reflecting 1.6% annual population
growth.
2,142,508
2,570,955
2,788,290
0
500,000
1,000,000
1,500,000
2,000,000
2,500,000
3,000,000
2010 2020 2025
POPULATION BY YEAR
0
100,000
200,000
300,000
400,000
0-9 10-19 20-29 30-39 40-49 50-59 60-69 70-79 80+
AREA POPULATION BY AGE
Source: Esri
Source: Esri

© 2020 CBRE, Inc.

Area & Neighborhood Analysis
4

INCOME
EDUCATION
EMPLOYMENT
The area includes a total of 1,140,347 employees and has a 9.7% unemployment rate. The
top three industries within the area are Health Care/Social Assistance, Retail Trade and
Educational Services, which represent a combined total of 35% of the population.
The area features an average household
income of $80,440 and a median household
income of $57,259. Over the next five years,
median household income is expected to
increase by 6.3%, or $723 per annum.
A total of 29.3% of individuals over the age of
24 have a college degree, with 18.5% holding
a bachelor’s degree and 10.8% holding a
graduate degree.
$57,259
$60,874
$55,000
$56,000
$57,000
$58,000
$59,000
$60,000
$61,000
$62,000
2020 2025
MEDIAN INCOME BY YEAR
18.5%
10.8%
70.7%
POPULATION BY DEGREE
Bachelor’s Degree
Graduate Degree
Other
0% 2% 4% 6% 8% 10% 12% 14% 16%
Other Services (excl Publ Adm)
Public Administration
Manufacturing
Finance/Insurance
Prof/Scientific/Tech Services
Accommodation/Food Services
Construction
Educational Services
Retail Trade
Health Care/Social Assistance
Source: Esri
Source: Esri
Source: Esri

© 2020 CBRE, Inc.

Area & Neighborhood Analysis
5

Neighborhood Analysis

Location
The subject is located within the Castle Hills area of San Antonio and is considered a suburban
location. Although the subject is located within the city of Castle Hills, a city entirely surrounded by
San Antonio, the subject has a San Antonio address. Specifically, the subject site is located along the
north side of Jackson Keller Road between Herwick Drive and Palm Circle.
Boundaries
The neighborhood boundaries are detailed as follows:
North: Interstate Highway 410
South: Basse Road
East: McCollough Avenue
West: West Avenue
© 2020 CBRE, Inc.

Area & Neighborhood Analysis
6

Land Use & Growth Patterns
Immediate uses surrounding the subject are primarily residential uses along secondary roadways with
pockets of commercial development along primary roadways. The Castle Hills area is a mature
neighborhood located within north-central San Antonio and has limited areas of vacant land. The
majority of the development with the neighborhood is 20+ years old with mostly single-family
residential neighborhoods to the north and south of the subject. Most of the commercial development
in the neighborhood is located along Jackson Keller Road, West Road, and Basse Road. There are
several large-scale multifamily apartment complexes proximate to the subject along Jackson Keller
Road, with retail development located to the north near Interstate Highway 410. In addition, the LEE
high school campus is located just west of the subject.
Proximity to Healthcare Providers
The following table summarizes the area hospitals and their respective distance from the subject:
Hospital
Miles From
Subject Beds
Texsan Heart Hospital  2.40 45
Kindred Hospital-San Antonio  2.95 53
Methodist Hospital  3.74 602
Methodist Children’s Hospital  3.74 150
Texas Specialty Hospital  3.84 66
St Luke’s Baptist Hospital  3.92 269
Source: U.S. Hospital Finder
HOSPITAL SUMMARY

Access
Primary neighborhood access is provided as follows:
Collector Streets: Herwick Drive
Arterial Roadways: Jackson Keller Road, Blanco Road, West Avenue
Interstates/Highways: Interstate Highway 410, US Highway 281
Other: VIA, San Antonio International Airport
© 2020 CBRE, Inc.

Area & Neighborhood Analysis
7

Demographics
Selected neighborhood demographics are shown in the following table:
SELECTED NEIGHBORHOOD DEMOGRAPHICS
Ventura Hills Senior Living
1207 Jackson Keller Road
Population
2025 Total Population 59,466 225,212 503,297
2020 Total Population 58,621 219,805 486,369
2010 Total Population 57,755 213,160 461,240
2000 Total Population 57,245 212,886 456,965
Annual Growth 2020 – 2025 0.29% 0.49% 0.69%
Annual Growth 2010 – 2020 0.15% 0.31% 0.53%
Annual Growth 2000 – 2010 0.09% 0.01% 0.09%
Households
2025 Total Households 22,340 92,957 204,924
2020 Total Households 22,057 90,681 197,274
2010 Total Households 21,881 88,080 186,198
2000 Total Households 22,452 88,017 180,991
Annual Growth 2020 – 2025 0.26% 0.50% 0.76%
Annual Growth 2010 – 2020 0.08% 0.29% 0.58%
Annual Growth 2000 – 2010 -0.26% 0.01% 0.28%
Income
2020 Median Household Income $42,947 $44,006 $44,490
2020 Average Household Income $58,515 $68,094 $67,627
2020 Per Capita Income $21,959 $28,334 $27,702
2020 Pop 25+ College Graduates 8,553 48,437 108,312
Age 25+ Percent College Graduates – 2020 21.8% 32.5% 33.0%
Source: CBRE Fast Reports & ESRI
2 Miles 4 Miles 6 Miles

Area & Neighborhood Conclusion
The immediate neighborhood is supportive of the subject’s use as seniors housing. The neighborhood
contains healthcare providers that are supportive of the subject. Access to area highways, employment
centers, and shopping is good. Development has not been occurring within the subject’s
neighborhood, as the neighborhood is generally fully developed. Any recent development would be
infill. The neighborhood is in a stage of balance having a favorable impact on the subject property.

© 2020 CBRE, Inc.

Market Analysis

8

Market Analysis
The market analysis forms a basis for assessing market area boundaries, supply and demand factors,
and indications of financial feasibility. Primary data sources utilized for this analysis include National
Investment Center for The Seniors Housing & Care Industry (NIC), American Seniors Housing
Association (ASHA), and CBRE primary research. In analyzing the subject’s market as well as the
overall supply and demand fundamentals that impact the subject’s occupancy, the following steps
have been taken:
• Seniors Housing Market Overview
• Analyse Market and Submarket Trends
• Delineate and Analyse the Subject’s Primary Market Area
• Conduct a Penetration Analysis
• Conclusion
The subject is considered a Class C investment, Assisted Living Residence as defined earlier in this
report.
Seniors Housing Market Overview
The following discussion illustrates some general observations regarding the overall fundamentals of
the subject’s property type within the seniors housing sector. NIC MAP serves as a primary resource to
lenders, investors, developers and operators of seniors housing and care properties. NIC MAP reports
industry specific data for 100+ metro markets in the continental United States.
This data is tracked and reported by “Primary” and “Secondary” Metro Market averages, and by
individual markets. Key metrics and property information as tracked by NIC, and summarized below:
Care Level Aggregate Majority IL Majority AL Majority NC
Occupancy 84.9% 87.4% 82.1% 80.2%
Annual Rent Growth 2.1% 2.1% 2.0% 2.4%
Quarterly Absorption -15,078 -7,129 -7,939 -37,403
Quarterly Inventory Growth 3,389 1,197 2,192 -78
Units/Beds Under Construction 40,150 19,587 20,563 2,681
Construction vs. Inventory 6.2% 5.8% 6.6% 0.5%
Inventory 648,358 337,927 310,431 576,393
Care Level Aggregate Majority IL Majority AL Majority NC
Property Count 5,102 1,433 3,669 4,094
Inventory By Care Segment 648,358 337,927 310,431 576,393
Independent Living Units 266,898 248,876 18,022 11,165
Assisted Living Units 251,010 43,398 207,612 18,445
Memory Care Units 89,540 12,396 77,144 3,790
Nursing Care Beds 40,910 33,257 7,653 542,993
Source: NIC MAP® Data Service, Q2 2020
SENIORS HOUSING KEY METRICS Q2 2020
SENIORS HOUSING PROPERTIES BY CARE TYPE

© 2020 CBRE, Inc.

http://www.nic.org/overview/default.aspx

Market Analysis

9

National Seniors Housing Overview
“The effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on the seniors housing sector fully appeared in second
quarter data. Indeed, seniors housing occupancy fell to an all-time low of 84.9% in the second
quarter of 2020, a decrease of 280 basis points from the first quarter and from a year ago. As of the
second quarter, occupancy was 530 basis points below its most recent peak of 90.2% in the fourth
quarter of 2014.
SENIORS HOUSING SUPPLY-DEMAND TRENDS

Net absorption was negative in the second quarter of 2020 due to a near-halt by many operators on
accepting new residents and as the pace of move-outs accelerated for some operators due to the
need for higher care or possibly death. The number of occupied units decreased by 15,078, which
represented an absorption rate of -2.7% during the quarter, down 330 basis points from the prior
quarter’s pace. Annual absorption was -0.5%, down 350 basis points from the prior quarter’s pace
and from a year ago.
The pace of inventory growth slowed during the second quarter increased by 3,389 units, which
represented a quarterly growth rate of 0.5%, down 40 basis points from the prior quarter and down
50 basis points from a year ago. Inventory increased by 2.8% in the past year, down 50 basis points
from the prior quarter and down 40 basis points from a year ago.
Overall construction activity was down during the second quarter of 2020. During the quarter, there
were 40,150 units under construction, down 5.6% from the prior quarter. Construction represented
6.2% of existing inventory, down 40 basis points from the prior quarter.
The pace of annual rent growth decelerated during the second quarter of 2020. During the second
quarter, annual rent growth was 2.1%, down 50 basis points from the prior quarter and down 100
basis points from a year ago. The average asking rent for seniors housing was $4,308 as of the
second quarter.”5

5 NIC MAP® Data Service, Q2 2020
© 2020 CBRE, Inc.

Market Analysis

10

National Assisted Living Overview
“Assisted living occupancy decreased 320 basis points from the first quarter of 2020 to a time-series
low of 82.1% in the second quarter. Occupancy is now 680 basis points below its recent high of
88.9% reached during the fourth quarter of 2014. The fall back in occupancy was largely due to the
COVID-19 pandemic as operators intentionally stopped move-ins to control the spread of the virus
and move-outs accelerated.
MAJORITY ASSISTED LIVING SUPPLY-DEMAND TRENDS

Absorption was negative in the second quarter of 2020. The number of occupied units decreased by
7,939 units, which represented an absorption rate of -3.0% during the quarter, down 360 basis points
from the prior quarter’s pace and down 410 basis points from a year ago. Annual absorption was –
0.2%, down 420 basis points from the prior quarter and down 440 basis points from a year ago.
The pace of inventory growth slowed during the second quarter of 2020. Inventory grew by 2,192
units, which represented a quarterly growth rate of 0.7%, down 30 basis points from the prior quarter.
Inventory increased by 3.3% in the past year, down 40 basis points from the prior quarter and down
110 basis points from a year ago.
Construction activity was down during the second quarter of 2020. In the second quarter, there were
20,563 units under construction, down 7.2% from the prior quarter. Construction represented 6.6% of
existing inventory, down 60 basis points from the prior quarter.
The pace of annual rent growth slowed during the second quarter of 2020. During the second
quarter, annual rent growth was 2.0%, down 60 basis points from the prior quarter and down 50
basis points from a year ago. The average asking rent for assisted living was $5,263 as of the second
quarter.”6

6 NIC MAP® Data Service, Q2 2020
© 2020 CBRE, Inc.

Market Analysis

11

National Owners & Operators
Beyond offering residential space to the tenants of a seniors housing and care property (the “real
estate component”), the seniors housing landlord typically provides its residents an integrated service
offering to address the varied needs of the property’s population of seniors (the “services component”).
The implementation and management of these services correlates directly to the underlying value of
the real estate. The top ten seniors housing owners and management are summarized as follows:
Rank Company Headquarters Properties Units
1 Brookdale Senior Living Brentwood, TN 786 65,864
2 Welltower, Inc. Toledo, OH 645 65,141
3 Ventas, Inc. Chicago, IL 673 58,080
4 Boston Capital Boston, MA 431 32,985
5 HCP Inc. Irvine, CA 281 31,911
6 Senior Housing Property Trust Newton, MA 274 31,840
7 Colony Capital Los Angeles, CA 224 19,621
8 New Senior Investment Group New York, NY 133 15,513
9 The Evangelical Lutheran Sioux Falls, SD 81 13,927
10 Senior Lifestyle Chicago, IL 143 13,718
Source: American Seniors Housing Association
TOP 10 SENIORS HOUSING OWNERS

Rank Company Headquarters Properties Units
1 Brookdale Senior Living Brentwood, TN 994 96,026
2 LCS Des Moines, IA 130 33,883
3 Holiday Retirement Winter Park, FL 263 31,862
4 Five Star Senior Living, Inc. Newton, MA 252 29,185
5 Sunrise Senior Living, Inc. McLean, VA 260 26,982
6 Erickson Living Catonsville, MD 19 22,726
7 Atria Senior Living, Inc. Louisville, KY 179 21,512
8 Senior Lifestyle Chicago, IL 195 19,949
9 Capital Senior Living Corp. Dallas, TX 129 16,523
10 The Evangelical Lutheran Sioux Falls, SD 81 13,927
Source: American Seniors Housing Association
TOP 10 SENIORS HOUSING OPERATORS

Demand Influences
Demand for seniors housing is primarily driven by people over the age 75. As of 2010, approximately
5% of the US population, or roughly 19.0 million individuals, were aged 75 years or older. The
percentage of seniors in this age group will continue to grow at a steady pace though 2020, at which
point, the percentage of seniors in the age group is projected to grow at a much more significant rate
due to the aging of the baby boomers. According to projections provided by the United States Census
Bureau, the population age 65 and older is expected to more than double between 2012 and 2060.
© 2020 CBRE, Inc.

Market Analysis

12

0%
2%
4%
6%
8%
10%
12%
14%
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
1980A 1990A 2000A 2010A 2015F 2020F 2025F 2030F 2035F 2040F 2045F 2050F 2055F 2060F
%
o
f To
ta
l Po
p
u
la
tio
n
7
5
+
P
o
p
u
la
tio
n
(
M
ill
io
n
s)
Population 75+ % of Total Population
Baby boomers are defined as persons born between 1946 and 1964. As of 2012, this generation
accounted for approximate 76.4 million people, or about one-quarter of the U.S. population. The
baby boomers began turning 65 in 2011. By 2029, the remainder will reach age 65 accounting for
more than 20 percent of the U.S. population.
40.3
56.4
74.1
82.3 88.0
98.2
5.5 6.7 9.1
14.6 19.0 19.7
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
2010A 2020F 2030F 2040F 2050F 2060F
Po
p
u
la
tio
n
(
M
ill
io
n
s)
Population 65+ Population 85+
By 2050, the 65-plus age group is estimated to equal 88.0 million, nearly double its current
population (48.6 million). The projected growth in this age group will present many challenges to
policy makers and programs by having a significant impact on families, businesses, healthcare
providers and, most notably, the demand for senior housing.
National Capitalization Rate Trends
For H1 2020, the CBRE Valuation & Advisory Seniors Housing and Healthcare practice group
published the eighth edition of the U.S. Seniors Housing & Care Investor Survey. Since first publication
in 2014, the CBRE Seniors Housing & Care Investor Survey methodology has been consistent,
resulting in a long legacy of data continuity.
Notably, this survey was conducted through February 2020, just before the economy was impacted by
the COVID-19 pandemic. At the time, survey respondents had only a limited perception of the
potential adverse impact of the pandemic; COVID-19 will be more fully addressed later in this Market
Analysis section. Nevertheless, the results of this survey provide a solid benchmark of investor
© 2020 CBRE, Inc.

Market Analysis

13

sentiment just before the COVID-19 outbreak in the U.S. The historical capitalization rate trends per
this survey are shown within the following graphs.
HISTORICAL CAPITALIZATION RATE TRENDS

Capitalization rates for all segments of the seniors housing industry have compressed since H1 2014.
Assisted living had the most significant change of nearly 1 percentage point (86 bps). Cap rates for
continuing care retirement/life plan communities (CCRC/LPCs) fell by 73 bps, while those for
independent living fell by 60 bps and for memory care by 56 bps. Skilled nursing capitalization rates
had the flattest trendline, with compression of only 23 bps over the reporting periods.
Historical data reflected generally downward movement through H2 2017, with a short-lived uptick in
H1 2018 and H1 2019. The H1 2020 survey reflects a reversal and an across-the-board
compression.
© 2020 CBRE, Inc.

Market Analysis

14

Capitalization Rate & Price Per Unit Trends
Historically, capitalization rates for seniors housing properties have fallen above multifamily assets, all
else being equal, accounting for significant operational differences. In recent periods, seniors housing
transactions continue to maintain a considerable spread above traditional multifamily capitalization
rates. As of Q1 2020, capitalization rate indications show a spread of 66 bps during the trailing four
quarterly periods, and 39 bps during the most recent quarter.
CAPITALIZATION RATE AND PRICING TRENDS
Source: NIC and RCA Data Compiled by CBRE
© 2020 CBRE, Inc.

Market Analysis

15

Current Market Condition Considerations – COVID Impact
As discussed, the outbreak of the Novel Coronavirus (COVID-19/COVID), declared by the World
Health Organization as a “Global Pandemic” on March 11, 2020, is causing heightened uncertainty
in both local and global market conditions. This pandemic has caused fluidity in the seniors housing
market conditions and resulted in reduced current, empirical market data as to potential impacts to
the seniors housing industry.
National Occupancy Trends – COVID Impact
A primary impact of COVID-19 within the seniors housing industry has been on occupancy levels. As
of Q2 2020, the NIC released the updated occupancy trends for each care level. On a national
basis, this data shows downward trending median occupancy levels for each care type, at -150 bps
for IL, -300 bps for AL, -250 bps for MC, and -670 bps for SNF (NC).
SENIORS HOUSING & CARE MEDIAN OCCUPANCY TRENDS
Source: NIC MAP Q2 2020
82%
83%
84%
85%
86%
87%
88%
89%
90%
91%
92%
93%
94%
95%
96%
Q2 2012 Q2 2013 Q2 2014 Q2 2015 Q2 2016 Q2 2017 Q2 2018 Q2 2019 Q2 2020
Independent Living Assisted Living Memory Care Skilled Nursing
I L -150 bps
AL -3 00 bps
MC -250 bps
N C -670 bps

While the overall national occupancy trends show significant declines, reductions in census levels have
fluctuated significantly by location, including regional geography and pockets considered as ‘COVID-
19 Hotspots’ as well as operator response to COVID-19 on the community level.
For further occupancy trends since March 2020, NIC reports a majority of occupancy decline was
reported to have occurred in April 2020, with reducing rates of census attrition during May and June.
The chart on the following page includes reported ‘re-absorption’ in seniors housing communities by
© 2020 CBRE, Inc.

Market Analysis

16

level of care. As shown, the trough in positive occupancy rate trends was mostly between late April
and early May 2020, with significant improvements in reported census re-absorption accelerating in
June 2020. These increases occupancy continued into August 2020 for both assisted living and
skilled nursing. However, during the August 2020 reporting period, respondents reported somewhat
of a deceleration in the re-absorption of independent living and memory care communities. Impacts
of COVID-19 on the subject’s local and regional level are discussed within the ‘Market Occupancy’
subsection of this report.
Source: NIC Executive Survey Insights
Current Occupancy Levels vs. One Month Prior (Month Over Month)
SHARE OF ORGANIZATIONS REPORTING INCREASED OCCUPANCY RATES
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
35%
40%

Market Summary – COVID Impact
Throughout this ongoing pandemic, the CBRE U.S. Seniors Housing valuation practice group has
been in continuous contact with numerous market participants, working to discern any perceived
and/or quantifiable impact of COVID-19 on the seniors housing market, in real-time. Our discussions
include potential near-, mid-, and long-term influences on seniors housing community operations,
capital markets, and investor sentiment. These discussions consist of a broad range of market
participants active in seniors housing, inclusive of capital markets, private capital investors,
institutional fund managers, developers, community operators, and brokers. The following bullets
summarize the market discussions:
• Market participants on the investment side do not expect the economic recession to persist.
They opine marginal decreases in values on a quarter-over-quarter basis could be possible
but expect this to be a short-term adjustment.
© 2020 CBRE, Inc.

Market Analysis

17

• Equity funds have record-levels of committed capital that must be deployed in the near term;
however, they are in a ‘wait-and-see’ mode, assessing investment opportunities.
• Current market activity is showing capitalization rate fluctuations mostly range from 0 to 50
bps over pre-COVID levels for stabilized/near-stabilized communities.
• Capital markets have sizable liquidity and historically low interest rates; however, deployment
of capital is somewhat constrained given the continually changing market landscape.
• Challenges in completing due diligence have continued to impact capital markets, lenders,
and investors.
• Brokers indicate investors are starting to come back into the market and are getting a comfort
level with virtual due diligence, although at a tepid pace.
• Brokers report that, while buyers show continued demand, access to properties has been
limited to protect residents from potential spreading of COVID-19, marketing of communities
will likely be extended, mostly estimated in the 60 to 90 day range. Both the buy and sell side
believe this will be short-lived and they can wait it out.
• Operators that closed community access, permitting only essential services to enter, have
started to open to prospective residents in many cases. The impact of community closers
adversely impacted community census levels on aggregate.
• For skilled nursing, operators have provided somewhat mixed reports as to census; non-
essential operations at hospitals have started in select locations, and these hospital discharges
have started to positively impact skilled nursing census levels.
• While cases of COVID-19 have been reported in seniors housing communities, barrowing a
few exceptions, operators report quarantine efforts have been effective, with limited
advancement to the remaining resident population.
• Developers are currently planning to move forward on their projects that are ready to break
ground, in most scenarios. However, there could be near term disruptions in supply chains
and construction starts could be delayed due to shelter-in-place restrictions, requiring an
adjustment to budgets in next 60 days as the impact from those factors comes into focus.
• Construction lending is difficult under the current conditions. It should be noted that
construction lenders are actively assessing risk for the property type on a daily basis as market
data becomes available.
Overall, market participants suggest that markets are incorporating consideration for COVID-19,
working to assess potential impact on the seniors housing sector. While a majority of market
participants indicated that they do not expect significant price adjustments in the near term, the
consensus is that it is too early to quantifiably opine as the impact of this pandemic. Again, please
note that these statements are as of the date of the effective date of this report; however, given the
recent rate of change in market conditions, these comments are subject to change in the near term.

© 2020 CBRE, Inc.

Market Analysis

18

Submarket Trends
The National Investment Center for the Seniors Housing and Care Industry (NIC) tracks and reports
various operational and statistical data through their NIC MAP database. NIC MAP covers 140
Metropolitan Areas across the United States with the San Antonio, TX Metro being the most
comparable to the subject’s market. Performance trends and attributes of the subject’s metro market
are summarized as follows:
Period
#
Properties
# Rev.
Units
All
Properties Stabilized Absorption
Inventory
Growth
#
Properties
# Rev.
Units
YoY Rent
Growth
4Q2009 30 1,960 91.60% 91.60% -0.50% 0 0 0 0.40%
4Q2010 30 1,959 90.00% 90.00% -1.80% 0 1 32 0.30%
4Q2011 30 1,959 90.20% 90.20% 0.20% 0 1 32 2.70%
4Q2012 32 2,016 87.30% 88.20% -0.40% 17 3 179 4.20%
1Q2013 32 2,015 88.60% 89.20% 1.80% -1 4 195 4.10%
2Q2013 32 2,015 87.80% 88.10% 0.50% 0 6 311 3.80%
3Q2013 32 2,014 89.10% 89.10% 0.40% -1 6 311 4.70%
4Q2013 34 2,130 87.40% 90.30% 5.80% 116 4 192 3.10%
1Q2014 35 2,149 86.30% 89.30% 3.80% 19 3 176 3.10%
2Q2014 37 2,257 83.40% 89.60% 6.40% 108 3 207 1.10%
3Q2014 37 2,257 83.10% 88.60% 4.50% 0 5 325 0.30%
4Q2014 37 2,260 82.60% 87.40% 0.20% 3 7 466 1.50%
1Q2015 37 2,252 81.90% 85.80% -0.60% -8 8 526 1.20%
2Q2015 38 2,273 80.20% 84.70% -3.10% 21 10 639 2.40%
3Q2015 38 2,274 81.10% 84.60% -1.70% 1 12 786 -1.30%
4Q2015 41 2,516 75.60% 85.40% 2.00% 242 10 629 -0.50%
1Q2016 44 2,680 72.90% 84.20% 5.90% 164 7 465 1.70%
2Q2016 45 2,743 72.90% 80.90% 9.60% 63 7 440 1.40%
3Q2016 45 2,743 74.60% 80.60% 11.00% 0 8 456 2.90%
4Q2016 49 3,009 70.30% 81.40% 11.20% 266 5 202 1.90%
1Q2017 49 3,009 71.80% 81.10% 10.70% 0 5 202 -1.30%
2Q2017 49 3,025 72.50% 79.00% 9.70% 16 4 186 0.50%
3Q2017 51 3,164 71.00% 78.70% 9.70% 139 2 47 0.60%
4Q2017 51 3,164 73.10% 77.80% 9.40% 0 2 47 0.20%
1Q2018 52 3,211 73.30% 77.90% 8.90% 47 0 0 1.80%
2Q2018 52 3,211 74.40% 78.60% 8.90% 0 0 0 1.70%
3Q2018 52 3,211 74.70% 76.70% 6.90% 0 0 0 5.70%
4Q2018 52 3,211 75.50% 76.00% 4.80% 0 0 0 6.70%
1Q2019 52 3,211 76.10% 76.40% 3.80% 0 0 0 6.30%
2Q2019 52 3,212 77.40% 77.70% 4.20% 1 0 0 4.00%
3Q2019 52 3,211 79.80% 79.80% 6.80% -1 0 0 2.20%
4Q2019 52 3,188 79.50% 79.50% 4.60% -23 2 136 3.00%
1Q2020 52 3,256 79.10% 79.10% 5.40% 68 3 152 -1.90%
2Q2020 52 3,199 76.50% 76.50% -1.70% -57 3 152 0.80%
Source: NIC MAP; Majority AL, for San Antonio, TX
ASSISTED LIVING METRO TRENDS

© 2020 CBRE, Inc.

Market Analysis

19

Primary Market Area Performance Summary
The first step in analyzing the competitive market for the subject is delineating the subject’s primary
market area (PMA). A PMA can be defined by a radius, node(s), submarket(s), zip code(s), county(s) or
township(s), or any variety of such defining terms. This cohort represents where approximately 70% to
80% of the residents currently occupying the subject resided prior to moving in to the subject property.
Based on discussions with property management as well as marketing directors at comparable
properties to the subject, the subject’s primary market area is outlined in the following map.

CBRE researched all current and proposed supply within the subject’s primary market area.
Comparables 1 through 5 were profiled as rent comparables and are included in the competitive
supply. Comparable 6 was not profiled as a rent comparable, but is located within the PMA and has
been included in the competitive supply.
© 2020 CBRE, Inc.

Market Analysis

20

Future Supply
Future supply is one of the greatest potential impacts on a market’s balance. Hence, any properties
under construction or proposed for construction within the subject’s PMA must be identified. To do so,
data obtained by CBRE Econometric Advisers (Pipeline Reports) was researched and inquiries to local
planning and zoning approval offices were conducted. There are no proposed assisted living
communities within the PMA.
Direct Competitors
In addition to the above PMA analysis, the following comparable properties have been surveyed to
identify the occupancy and rental trends within the subject’s immediate market area. Only properties
offering similar services were identified as direct competition to the subject. Note communities within
as well as surrounding the subject PMA were considered, with the most comparable properties
included; these comparables will be further discussed within the Income Capitalization Approach
section of this report. The comparable data is summarized in the following table:
SUMMARY OF COMPARABLE COMMUNITY RENTALS
Comp.
No. Name
Occupancy
Trends
Miles from
Subject Base Rate AL Base Rate MC
1 The Forum at Lincoln Heights Stable 2.4 $4,299 – $5,195 $5,626
2 Brookdale Alamo Heights Stable 2.5 $2,295 – $4,100
3 Franklin Park – Alamo Heights Stable 2.5 $3,625 – $4,995 $5,995 – $6,195
4 Adante Senior Living Stable 3.0 $3,850 – $4,950 $5,400
5 The Village at Incarnate Word Stable 3.7 $3,205 – $5,211 $4,422 – $6,207
Subject $2,595 – $3,095 $4,150 – $5,150
Source: CBRE VIEW Database
© 2020 CBRE, Inc.

Market Analysis

21

Subject’s Market Trends
Submarket Summary
The following table summarizes key market statistics identified by CBRE for the subject’s PMA, NIC
MAP metro market, and NIC MAP Primary or Secondary market average.
SENIORS HOUSING MARKET STATISTICS
Category Subject’s PMA San Antonio, TX MAP Primary
Assisted Living
Average Occupancy 83.0% 76.5% 85.3%
Average Monthly Rent $4,723 $4,125 $5,364
Property Count 7 52 4,389
Inventory (Rev. Units) 551 3,199 269,455
Construction (Rev. Units) 0 152 17,229
Construction vs. Inventory 0.00% 4.80% 8.60%
Penetration 5.06% 4.20% 4.50%
Source: NIC MAP

Penetration Analysis
A penetration analysis can be performed to determine the overall market depth, as well as the
potential impact of any future supply within the subject’s defined market area. Penetration is defined
as the competitive inventory (including the subject) divided by the number of age-qualified
households. There are several methodologies in calculating penetration. Though somewhat simplistic,
this method is the most widely recognized respective to the subject’s property type. Most importantly, it
represents the methodology employed by the National Investment Center for the Seniors Housing &
Care Industry, therefore allowing for accurate benchmarking against other markets.
This analysis begins by identifying current and proposed competitive supply within the subject’s defined
PMA. The supply estimate is then applied to demand generators relative to the age qualified
demographics of the PMA.
© 2020 CBRE, Inc.

Market Analysis

22

Supply
The following table summarizes all competitive and proposed properties located within the subject’s
PMA:
Property AL MC AL MC
Subject 80 17 80 17
The Forum at Lincoln Heights * 30 28 30 28
Brookdale Alamo Heights * 96 – 96 –
Franklin Park – Alamo Heights * 64 40 64 40
Adante Senior Living * 60 20 60 20
The Village at Incarnate Word * 50 24 50 24
The Meadows Assisted Living 42 42 –
Total Supply 422 129 422 129
* Property utilized as a rent comparable.
Source: CBRE VIEW Database
20252020
COMPETITIVE SUPPLY SUMMARY

Barriers to Entry
Interest rates and other financing terms remain very attractive with construction levels at all-time highs.
Increased construction costs and declining occupancy levels has caused developers to take pause.
Nevertheless, all-in development costs remain well below acquisition costs of an existing property.
Hence, new development remains an attractive and feasible option for investors.
Investors and underwriters are aware of the potential for overbuilding. Underwriting requirements and
levels of due diligence are increasing. Most lenders and investors are requiring extensive market
research and a successful track record of developing and-or operating seniors housing properties to
move forward.
Licensure requirements relative to the subject’s property type are present in Texas. As further detailed
later in this report, there is no moratorium on new licensure. Only the operational and staffing
requirements must be met for a property to be granted a license to operate. The availability of land for
development is also limited within the subject’s general location, further restricting new development.
© 2020 CBRE, Inc.

Market Analysis

23

Market Occupancy
Occupancy trends for the subject’s MSA as well as the NIC MAP Primary and Secondary Metro
Markets have been summarized. To best understand market performance within the subject’s PMA,
current occupancy for all competing properties have been gathered.
Property AL MC
Subject 45% 82%
The Forum at Lincoln Heights 80% 79%
Brookdale Alamo Heights 82%
Franklin Park – Alamo Heights 91% 100%
Adante Senior Living 100% 95%
The Village at Incarnate Word 98% 96%
The Meadows Assisted Living 80%
Estimated Occupied Supply 340 118
Average Occupancy 80.5% 91.5%
Avg. for Stabilized Properties 88.8% 92.9%
Source: CBRE VIEW Database
COMPETITIVE OCCUPANCY SUMMARY

Demand Analysis
Demand for seniors housing and care properties can be clearly defined by specific age cohorts,
healthcare requirements, and income levels. Future demand can be estimated by understanding
population shifts or trends relative to this defined population segment.
This section of the market analysis begins by identifying the age-qualified segment of the population.
Various methodologies suggest that consideration should be given to the “adult child” influence,
which typically result in an in-migration to the PMA as the adult child will typically bring their
respective parent to a property close to their home. However, in accounting for an “adult child”
factor, out-migration must also be considered for similar reasoning.
Considering that various markets can behave differently based on locational attributes, climates, local
economies, and overall population behaviors, this analysis assumes that the typical in-migration will
net out the typical out-migration. This also allows for accurate benchmarking in comparing the
subject’s market to the various data-points presented.
Population by Age Cohorts
According to the National Study of Long Term Care Providers published by the Centers for Disease
Control and Prevention (CDC) and National Center for Health Statistics (NCHS), conducted in 2016
and published February 2018, the average age of residents living in residential care communities (IL,
AL, MC) is 86.9 years. The following table illustrates the population and projected household changes
for the subject’s primary market area.
© 2020 CBRE, Inc.

Market Analysis

24

SENIOR POPULATION BY AGE
Ventura Hills Senior Living
1207 Jackson Keller Road
2020 Population
Total Population 58,621 219,805 486,369
Age 65 – 74 5,124 19,773 42,924
Age 75 – 84 2,955 11,096 23,295
Age 85+ 1,516 6,129 12,025
2025 Population
Total Population 59,466 225,212 503,297
Age 65 – 74 5,729 21,696 47,330
Age 75 – 84 3,497 13,708 29,361
Age 85+ 1,543 6,372 12,710
% Change
Total Population 1.44% 2.46% 3.48%
Age 65 – 74 11.81% 9.73% 10.26%
Age 75 – 84 18.34% 23.54% 26.04%
Age 85+ 1.78% 3.96% 5.70%
Source: CBRE Fast Reports & ESRI
2 Miles 4 Miles 6 Miles

Considering 85+ is the average resident population age at senior living communities, it can be
assumed that residents enter these communities at earlier ages as well as later ages. Therefore, this
analysis considers the 75 to 84 and the 85+ age cohort as age-qualified demand.
Income Distributions
Income available for expenditure on housing and other consumer items is a primary factor in
determining income qualified demand. The following table illustrates estimated household income
distributions for the subject’s primary market area.
© 2020 CBRE, Inc.

Market Analysis

25

ESTIMATED HOUSEHOLD INCOME BY AGE
2020 Households 65-74 Years 75 – 84 Years 85+ Years
– Income Less than $15,000 1,961 1,311 724
– Income $15,000 to $24,999 1,528 1,358 750
– Income $25,000 to $34,999 1,446 949 524
– Income $35,000 to $49,999 2,172 1,153 637
– Income $50,000 to $74,999 2,170 966 533
– Income $75,000 to $99,999 1,232 453 250
– Income $100,000 to $149,999 1,026 417 231
– Income $150,000 to $199,999 376 193 107
– Income $200,000 and Over 535 209 116
Total Households 12,447 7,009 3,872
Average Household Income $65,739 $54,130 n/a
Median Household Income $42,603 $33,469 n/a
Estimated Average Housing Value $276,923 $276,923 $276,923
2025 Households 65-74 Years 75 – 84 Years 85+ Years
– Income Less than $15,000 2,019 1,617 752
– Income $15,000 to $24,999 1,530 1,565 727
– Income $25,000 to $34,999 1,536 1,137 529
– Income $35,000 to $49,999 2,294 1,390 646
– Income $50,000 to $74,999 2,502 1,225 570
– Income $75,000 to $99,999 1,394 591 275
– Income $100,000 to $149,999 1,139 548 255
– Income $150,000 to $199,999 408 248 115
– Income $200,000 and Over 618 275 128
Total Households 13,439 8,597 3,996
Average Household Income $70,519 $58,128 n/a
Median Household Income $44,582 $34,758 n/a
Estimated Average Housing Value $304,998 $304,998 $304,998
Source: CBRE Fast Reports & ESRI
The immediate area surrounding the subject is projected to experience growth relative to households,
population, and income levels over the next five-year period. Foregoing any changes in competitive
supply, these trends do indicate a favorable demand outlook.
© 2020 CBRE, Inc.

Market Analysis

26

Penetration Analysis Conclusion
Applying the competitive supply indications to the total demand indications yields the following
penetrations rates:
2020 2025
Assisted Living
Age Qualified Households (75+) 10,881 12,593
Total Supply 551 551
Indicated Penetration Rate: 5.06% 4.38%
Compiled by CBRE
MARKET PENETRATION

Penetration rates alone can have multiple meanings. To properly understand market penetration,
market occupancy must also be considered. The various market types are summarized as follows:
• Low Penetration/ High Occupancy: This combination is the most favorable. The high occupancy
indicates that the local population is accepting the subject’s product type with significant room for
expansion. This combination also suggests a higher than typical ratio of residents emanating from
outside the defined PMA, or above market net in-migration. This market suggests strong
occupancy, stable rent growth, and healthy absorption for proposed properties.

• Low Penetration/ Low Occupancy: Age and income qualified seniors are either not accepting the
property type or are traveling outside the defined PMA to obtain their respective needs, due to
unsatisfactory product within the PMA. This combination suggests that market opportunity does
exist, but will likely require additional marketing efforts to achieve a favorable stabilized
occupancy level.

• High Penetration/ High Occupancy: While this combination can indicate a competitive market, it
does presume that the local population is well educated with the property type and generally
receptive to the services provided. Markets displaying this combination require less marketing
efforts in terms of product education, but may require more resources from a competitive market
position standpoint, such as superior quality or affordable rents.

• High Penetration/ Low Occupancy: This combination is the least favorable and most likely depicts
a saturated market. Decreasing rental rates, prevalence of concessions, and less than favorable
occupancy can be expected when this combination is displayed.

The subject’s primary market area is defined by comparing the PMA occupancy and penetration
metrics to the respective NIC MAP market metrics as summarized below.

© 2020 CBRE, Inc.

Market Analysis

27

Property Type Penetration Occupancy Penetration Occupancy Penetration Occupancy
Assisted Living 4.2% 76.5% 5.1% 83.0% High High
Assisted Living 4.2% 76.5% 4.4% 83.0% High High
Source: Compiled from Various Sources
PENETRATION ANALYSIS CONCLUSION
Future Market Rating (Five Years)
Current Market Rating
NIC MSA Subject PMA CBRE Market Rating

Market Analysis Conclusion
To determine market demand, CBRE employed a penetration analysis. These conclusions are further
supported by discussions with local marketing directors at comparable properties within and around
the subject’s defined market area.
Assisted Living Penetration
The independent living penetration analysis yields high penetration with high market occupancy
indicating a balanced market. While this combination can indicate a competitive market, it does
presume that the local population is well educated with the property type and generally receptive to
the services provided. Markets displaying this combination require less marketing efforts in terms of
product education, but may require more resources from a competitive market position standpoint,
such as superior quality or affordable rents. Penetration is expected to decrease over the next five
years, indicating demand is anticipated to outpace competitive supply. Hence, occupancy and-or
rental rates are expected to remain generally constant over the next five-year period.
Supply and Demand Conclusion
The subject’s market is balanced with the subject required to capture its proportionate share of market
demand to obtain the estimated stabilized levels. The subject offers an overall quality and amenity
package in line with the demands of the location population offered.
The location of the subject with favorable economic and population trends, along with physical and
operational attributes that meet the needs of the local population suggest that the subject will capture
the appropriate share of the market to obtain a stabilized occupancy level consistent with current
market indications for stabilized properties. The subject has not been efficiently managed and would
benefit from managerial oversight at the property level.
Subject Analysis
Licensure Requirements
Licensure requirements specific to the subject’s use are summarized below. CBRE does not represent
to be legal experts regarding the subject’s adherence to the respective state guidelines. According to
the state regulatory agency, the subject’s license is current and in good standing.
© 2020 CBRE, Inc.

Market Analysis

28

CLASSIFICATION: Assisted Living Facilities – Type B Facility
REGULATORY REFERENCES: Texas Administrative Code, Title 40, Part 1, Chapter 92
MINIMUM SIZE (UNITS): 4+
MANDATORY SERVICES:
ADL Care Yes
Transportation None
Laundry Yes
Activities /Recreation Yes
Arranging Health Related Services None
Housekeeping None
Medications Management Yes
Monitoring Yes
Other 3+ meals/day
PERMITTED SERVICES:
Assistance with Medications Yes
Administer Medications By licensed staff (see notes)
Intermittent Nursing None
Other Limited SN services permitted; temporary SN services for minor illness or injury.
REGULATED SUBJECTS:
Admission Agreements Yes
Resident Funds Limited
Care Plan Yes
Medication Storage Yes
Dietary Requirements Yes
Other None
ADMINISTRATOR:
Education/ exam High school or equivalent (more if larger facility)
Continuing Education 12 hrs/yr
Availability 40 hrs/wk
Other (Qualifications, etc.) 24 hr training
STAFFING LEVELS
Staff; Resident Ratio None
Required Hours Night shift staff immediately available/awake
Licensed None
Other Qualifications Direct care: 6 hrs ed./yr (1 hr behavior mgmt; 1 hr fall prevention)
MANDATORY DISCHARGE
Ongoing Nursing Care Yes
Danger to Self/Others Yes
Unable to Evacuate Type A Facilities
Restraints None
Beyond Capabilities Yes
Other None
PHYSICAL PLANT
Maximum Occupancy/Unit 4
Size of Unit (single occupancy) Type A: 80 SF; Type B: 100 SF
Size of Unit (multiple occupancy) Type A: 60 SF/bed; Type B: 80 SF/bed
Toilet 1:6 residents
Bath or Shower 1:10 residents
Other Effective January 6, 2014, 2000 NFPA was implimented
CERTIFICATE OF NEED No
LICENSING AGENCY Health and Human Services Commission
MEDICAID WAIVER/ STATE PLAN Yes
NOTES May request resident to remain at facility if appropriate/condition has changed
Source: American Seniors Housing Assoc., State Regulatory Handbook
STATE REGULATORY OVERVIEW
© 2020 CBRE, Inc.

Market Analysis

29

Management Overview
The buyer will place its affiliated operator, Atlantis Senior Living, as management of the subject post
sale. The principle of Atlantis Senior Living, James and Suzanne Denny, are experienced operators of
seniors housing communities. The analysis and conclusions within this report assume competent
management and market operations.
Absorption
The following table outlines average monthly move-ins for each property type as reported by NIC.
MOVE-IN RATES
Property Type
Average Monthly Move-
ins less Move-outs
Independent Living 6.1
Assisted Living 4.8
SNF 14.3
CCRC 13.5
Source: NIC

Considering the location of the subject and conclusions stated in the market analysis, lease-up is
expected to fall below the market averages presented above. The analysis concludes 24 months for a
lease-up period, which averages 1.6 units per month.
Stabilized Occupancy Estimate
The physical occupancy for the subject is detailed in the following chart:
PHYSICAL OCCUPANCY
Year
2019 Actual 51%
2020 YTD Ann. 54%
Year 2 Stabilized 95%
Year 2 As Stabilized 95%
CBRE Stabilized Estimate 90%
Compiled by CBRE

The subject has not been efficiently managed since it’s sale in late 2018, and has trailed the market in
terms of occupancy. The subject would benefit from managerial oversite on the property levels, and
following a 24-month estimated lease up, a stabilized occupancy at levels consistent with other
stabilized competitive properties in the market is considered achievable.
CBRE’s conclusion of stabilized occupancy for the subject is illustrated in the following table. This
estimate considers physical and economic market factors.
© 2020 CBRE, Inc.

Market Analysis

30

OCCUPANCY CONCLUSIONS
AL MC
NIC MAP – Primary/ Secondary Markets 85.3% 85.3%
NIC MAP – Subject MSA 76.5% 76.5%
Primary Market Area (All Properties) 80.5% 91.5%
Primary Market Area (Stabilized Only) 88.8% 92.9%
Subject’s Current Occupancy 45.0% 82.4%
CBRE Estimated Stabilized Occupancy 90.0% 90.0%
Lease-up Period 24 Months 24 Months
Compiled by CBRE

The vacancy estimate above represents physical occupancy based on resident days while the weighted
average vacancy represents economic vacancy based on potential gross income (PGI) attributable to
each component. Any disparity between the two figures is due to the differing levels of rent for the
subject’s care levels.
The concluded occupancy was applied to the subject’s unit mix to derive a weighted average
economic vacancy, as detailed below:
WEIGHTED AVERAGE ECONOMIC VACANCY
Care Level % of Total PGI Vacancy
Assisted Living 73.9% x 10.0% = 7.4%
Memory Care 26.1% x 10.0% = 2.6%
Indicated Weighted Average Vacancy (Rounded) 10.0%
Compiled by CBRE

Based on the market analysis, the subject’s PMA shows positive indicated demand. Additionally, in our
discussions with representatives at nearby, direct competitors, occupancies are reported to be in line
or above the MSA as a whole, with the exception of the subject. The CBRE stabilized occupancy
conclusion places primary weight on the market data.
Conclusion
The subject benefits from its location within the market. The improvements are well designed for their
respective use and offer amenities that are commensurate with the demands of the local population.
The data presented throughout the market analysis indicates that operating levels projected for the
subject are achievable. The subject’s census has not been negatively impacted by COVID, and it can
reasonably be estimated that there could be pent up demand following COVID.
© 2020 CBRE, Inc.

Site Analysis
31

ALTA SURVEY

© 2020 CBRE, Inc.

Site Analysis
32

FLOOD MAP

© 2020 CBRE, Inc.

Site Analysis
33

Site Analysis
The following chart summarizes the salient characteristics of the subject site.
SITE SUMMARY
Physical Description
Gross Site Area 11.76 Acres 512,410 Sq. Ft.
Net Site Area 6.14 Acres 267,603 Sq. Ft.
Primary Road Frontage Jackson Keller Road
Excess Land Area 5.62 Acres
Surplus Land Area None
Shape
Topography
Zoning District
Flood Map Panel No. & Date 48029C0245G 29-Sep-10
Flood Zone Zone X (Unshaded)
Comparative Analysis
Access
Visibility
Functional Utility
Traffic Volume
Adequacy of Utilities
Landscaping
Drainage
Utilities Adequacy
Water Yes
Sewer Yes
Natural Gas Yes
Electricity Yes
Telephone Yes
Mass Transit Yes
Other Yes No Unknown
Detrimental Easements X
Encroachments X
Deed Restrictions X
Reciprocal Parking Rights X
Common Ingress/Egress X
Source: Various sources compiled by CBRE
Provided
Irregular
Moderate Slope
C
Good
Adequate
Adequate
Good
SAWS
Provider
Assumed adequate
Adequate
Assumed adequate
VIA
SAWS
CPS
CPS

The excess land acreage was provided to us by the buyer. Per a representative of the buyer: “the size
of the vacant land is an estimate based on the 2018 appraisal plus the estimated size of the land from
google earth on the main campus side behind the buildings.”
© 2020 CBRE, Inc.

Site Analysis
34

Adjacent Properties
The adjacent land uses are summarized as follows:
North: Single-Family Residential
South: Single-Family Residential
East: Single-Family Residential
West: High School
The adjacent properties are conforming to the neighborhood and are complementary to the specific
use of the subject.
Flood Zone
According to flood hazard maps published by the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA),
the site is within Zone X (Unshaded). FEMA defines the subject’s respective zone flood zone(s) as
follows:
Zones C and X (unshaded) are flood insurance rate zones used for areas outside the 0.2-
percent-annual-chance floodplain. No Base Flood Elevations (BFEs) or depths are shown in
this zone, and insurance purchase is not required.
Conclusion
The site is well located and affords good access and visibility from roadway frontage. The size of the
site is typical for the area and use, and there are no known detrimental uses in the immediate vicinity.
There are no known factors that are considered to prevent the site from development to its highest and
best use, as if vacant, or adverse to the existing use of the site.
© 2020 CBRE, Inc.

Improvement Analysis
35

FLOOR PLANS

© 2020 CBRE, Inc.

Improvement Analysis
36

© 2020 CBRE, Inc.

Improvement Analysis
37

© 2020 CBRE, Inc.

Improvement Analysis
38

Improvement Analysis
In response to the COVID-19 Pandemic, in an effort to protect the resident population within the
subject property, and with the Client permission, the CBRE inspection included an exterior only
physical inspection of the subject property. The interior description of the subject is based on the
following resources:
• Interior photographs (listed below) as provided by buyer:
o Entry/lobby, common areas, dining areas, commercial kitchen, activity room, and a
sample of resident rooms.
• Individual unit floor plans and a community floor plan was provided by the buyer.
• Condition and Quality: The opinion of the subject condition and quality is based on the
observation of the provided photographs and floor plans.
Notably, the provided interior resources are considered to provide a description of the subject interior
in which to sufficiently provide credible assignment conclusions. As such, we make the extraordinary
assumption that the interior of the subject improvements is of similar condition and quality to the
description within this report.
The following chart shows a summary of the improvements.
SUMMARY OF IMPROVEMENTS
Breakdown by Care Level GBA NRA Units Beds Year Built Condition
Assisted Living 62,047 SF 35,065 SF 80 80 1999 Average
Memory Care 11,870 SF 7,523 SF 17 17 1999 Average
Total/ Average: 73,917 SF 42,588 SF 97 97 1999 Average
Fully Sprinklered Yes
Construction Class
Site Coverage
Land-to-Building Ratio
Floor Area Ratio (FAR)
Development Density
Functional Utility
Source: Compiled by CBRE
D – Wood frame, floor and structure; considered combustible
Typical for the subject’s specific use
13.8%
3.62 : 1
0.28
15.8 Rev. Units/Acre

Layout of Improvements
The improvements consist of three rectangularly shaped buildings. The two assisted living buildings
are two stories each and contain lobby area with office and reception areas. One assisted living
building contains the main commercial kitchen and dining area, while the other contains more
common space such as beauty shop, snack area, activity room, living room, and sun room. The one-
story memory care building contains a central common dining/activity space located adjacent to a
warming kitchen. A summary of the unit mix is included below:
© 2020 CBRE, Inc.

Improvement Analysis
39

ASSISTED LIVING UNIT MIX
Unit Type
No.
Beds
No.
Units
Revenue
Units
Percent of
Total
Unit Size (SF)
Range
Studio 66 66 66 68.0% 340 – 485
1 Bedroom 14 14 14 14.4% 560
Total/Average: 80 80 80 82.5% 438
Source: Various sources compiled by CBRE

MEMORY CARE UNIT MIX
Unit Type
No.
Beds
No.
Units
Revenue
Units
Percent of
Total
Unit Size (SF)
Range
Studio 17 17 17 17.5% 315 – 570
Total/Average: 17 17 17 17.5% 443
Source: Various sources compiled by CBRE

Conformity
The State of Seniors Housing Survey published by ASHA (American Seniors Housing Association)
reports the following design trends for the subject property type:
Average AL AL/MC Subject
Total Rev. Units
Lower Quartile 30 51 —
Average 59 89 97
Upper Quartile 106 135 —
GBA (SF) 36,550 61,570 73,917
Common Area (SF) 16,776 46% 30,016 49% 31,330 42%
Average Unit Size (SF) 392 382 439
Source: State of Seniors Housing Annual Report
CONFORMITY OF IMPROVEMENTS

In comparison, the subject’s improvements are generally considered to conform to overall design
trends for similar property types.
Description of Improvements
Construction Class: D – Wood frame, floor and structure; considered combustible.
The construction components are assumed to be in working
condition and adequate for the building.
Foundation: The foundations are assumed to be of adequate load-bearing capacity
to support the improvements.
Ground Floor: Concrete slab on compacted fill.
© 2020 CBRE, Inc.

Improvement Analysis
40

Roof Cover: Pitched roofing system consisting of built-up assemblies with a shingle
cover.
Flooring: The common areas have commercial grade carpeting with laminate or
ceramic tile flooring. The commercial kitchen has a quarry tile floor. The
resident units have carpet in the living and bedroom areas with sheet
vinyl tile in the bathrooms.
Exterior Walls: The exterior walls consist of stone veneer and stucco with decorative
trim. The building contains double-pane aluminum frame windows.
HVAC: All common areas contain central cooling and heating while resident
rooms have PTAC units.
Plumbing: The plumbing system is assumed to be adequate for the existing use and
in compliance with local law and building codes.
Electrical: The electrical system is assumed to be in good working order and
adequate for the building.
Security: Resident call systems in all the resident living areas and bathrooms, as
well as emergency back-up lighting system.
Utilities
The subject operations indicate that management is responsible for all utilities including electricity,
water and sewer costs. The individual units are separately wired for phone and cable services with the
tenants paying these costs.
Fire Protection
The subject property is wet sprinklered. It is assumed the improvements have adequate fire alarm
systems, fire exits, fire extinguishers, fire escapes and other fire protection measures to meet local fire
marshal requirements. CBRE, Inc. is not qualified to determine adequate levels of safety & fire
protection, whereby it is recommended that the client/reader review available permits, etc. prior to
making a business decision.
© 2020 CBRE, Inc.

Improvement Analysis
41

Project Amenities
Property and unit amenities for the subject property are summarized below:
• Community Dining Room
• Private Dining Room
• Other Dining Venues (Bistro)
• Game Room
• Arts & Craft Room
• Library/Computer Center
• Hair Salon
• Media Room

• Elevator Access to all Areas
• Laundry Facilities
• Wellness Center
• Resident Storage
• Mail Room
• Outside Patios/Walking Areas
• Enclosed Courtyard in Memory Care
The following are the individual living unit amenities and features are being offered at the subject:
• 24-Hour Emergency Response System
• Individual Air Controls
• Window Treatments
• Private Baths
• Showers with a Seat and Grab Bars and/or
Tub/Shower Combination
• Kitchenettes (AL units)
• Ample Closet Space
• Basic Cable Television Access

Parking and Drives
The subject appears to feature adequate surface parking, including reserved handicap spaces. All
parking spaces and vehicle drives are asphalt paved and considered to be in good condition.
Landscaping
Landscaping is in good condition and well maintained.
Functional Utility
The floor plans are considered to feature functional layouts and the layout of the overall project is
considered functional in utility.
ADA Compliance
The client/reader’s attention is directed to the specific limiting conditions regarding ADA compliance.
Furniture, Fixtures and Equipment
Additional personal property including all common area furniture, as well as all equipment required to
operate the subject property are typically included in the sale of a seniors housing property. These
items are in good condition.
© 2020 CBRE, Inc.

Improvement Analysis
42

Environmental Issues
CBRE, Inc. is not qualified to detect the existence of any potentially hazardous materials such as lead
paint, asbestos, urea formaldehyde foam insulation, or other potentially hazardous construction
materials on or in the improvements. The existence of such substances may affect the value of the
property. This analysis assumes that any hazardous materials that may cause a loss in value do not
affect the subject.
Cost to Complete (Capital Expenditures)
During this assignment we were provided a budget for the cost to complete a renovation of the
subject, as recapitulated within the following chart.
SUMMARY OF COST TO COMPLETE
Planned CapEx $300,313
Subtotal $300,313
Plus: Profit @ 10% $30,031
Total Cost to Complete $330,344
Source: Buyet

In addition to the cost to complete, a profit (entrepreneurial incentive) line item, based on a
percentage of cost, has been added to account for the time, effort, and cost of capital associated with
undertaking this project. This cost to complete estimate will be deducted from each approach to
conclude the As Is value for the subject.
Economic Age and Life
CBRE, Inc.’s estimate of the subject improvements effective age and remaining economic life is
depicted in the following chart:
ECONOMIC AGE AND LIFE
Actual Age 21 Years
Effective Age 15 Years
MVS Expected Life 55 Years
Remaining Economic Life 40 Years
Accrued Physical Incurable Depreciation 27.3%
Compiled by CBRE

The overall life expectancy is based upon our on-site observations and a comparative analysis of
typical life expectancies reported for buildings of similar construction as published by Marshall and
Swift, LLC, in the Marshall Valuation Service cost guide. While CBRE, Inc. did not observe anything to
suggest a different economic life, a capital improvement program could extend the life expectancy.
© 2020 CBRE, Inc.

Improvement Analysis
43

Conclusion
The improvements are considered to be functional in design and consistent with current design trends
for the subject’s respective property type. These improvements are expected to maximize the highest
and best use of the site.

© 2020 CBRE, Inc.

Zoning
44

ZONING MAP

Subject
© 2020 CBRE, Inc.

Zoning
45

Zoning
The following chart summarizes the subject’s zoning requirements.
ZONING SUMMARY
Current Zoning C
Legally Conforming Yes
Uses Permitted Zone C, Low Rise Apartment District, allows for single-
family and multifamily housing including seniors housing.
Ability to be Restored Without Permit Yes
Zoning Change Not likely
Source: Planning & Zoning Dept.

It is recommended that local planning and zoning personnel be contacted regarding more specific
information that might be applicable to the subject.
© 2020 CBRE, Inc.

Tax and Assessment Data
46

Tax and Assessment Data
The subject’s market value, assessed value, and taxes are summarized below, and do not include any
furniture, fixtures and equipment.
AD VALOREM TAX INFORMATION
Assessor’s Market Value 2020 CBRE Year 1
348290 $6,865,380
Subtotal $6,865,380 $6,865,380
Assessed Value @ 100% 100%
Total Assessed Value $6,865,380 $6,865,380
General Tax Rate (per $100 A.V.) 2.529500 2.529500
Total Taxes $173,660 $173,660
Source: Assessor’s Office

As the subject is currently owned by a non-profit, it is tax exempt and does pay a small amount in
Payment in Lieu of Taxes (PILOT) taxes. In 2019, current ownership paid $17,637 in PILOT taxes. As
the subject will be owned and operated by a for-profit, we have estimated taxes based on the full
assessment of the subject per the Bexar County Assessor, and the most recent tax rate given the
subject’s location.
Ad valorem taxing authorities having jurisdiction over the subject include Bexar County, San Antonio
River Authority, Alamo Community College, University Health System, City of Castle Hills, and
Northeast ISD. In Texas, real property is assessed at either 100% of market value or at a rate that is
equal and uniform to the property’s most comparable competitors. The effective date of the appraisal
is January 1 of the assessment year, with ad valorem taxes paid in arrears in January for the previous
year. Property owners are notified of the proposed values in May of that tax year, and property
owners have the right to protest the value with the Appraisal Review Board by June 2, or 30 days after
receiving notice of the proposed property value. There are no delinquent property taxes encumbering
the subject.
Tax Comparables
CBRE, Inc. has reviewed the real estate tax information for comparable properties in the subject’s
respective taxing district. The following table summarizes the comparables employed for this analysis:
© 2020 CBRE, Inc.

Tax and Assessment Data
47

AD VALOREM TAX COMPARABLES
Tax Comparable The Forum at Lincoln Heights Brookdale Alamo Heights Franklin Park – Alamo Heights CBRE Stabilized
Address 311 West Nottingham Drive 855 E Basse Road 230 West Sunset Road Estimate
County Bexar County Bexar County Bexar
City/ Town San Antonio San Antonio San Antonio
Year Built 1989 1998 2016 1999
No. Rev. Units 258 142 221 97
Tax Year 2020 2020 2020 2020
Total Assessed Value $21,200,000 $6,600,000 $40,500,000 $6,865,380
AV Per Rev. Unit $82,171 $46,479 $183,258 $70,777
Source: Assessor
Conclusion
The total taxes for the subject have been estimated as $173,660 for the base year of our analysis,
based upon an assessed value of $6,865,380 or $70,777 per unit. This is within the range of the tax
comparables and is considered reasonable given the current full assessment for the subject per Bexar
County.
© 2020 CBRE, Inc.

Highest and Best Use
48

Highest and Best Use
In appraisal practice, the concept of highest and best use represents the premise upon which value is
based. The four criteria the highest and best use must meet are:
• legally permissible;
• physically possible;
• financially feasible; and
• maximally productive.
The highest and best use analysis of the subject is discussed on the following pages.
As If Vacant
Legally Permissible
The legally permissible uses were discussed in the Site Analysis and Zoning Sections.
Physically Possible
The subject is adequately served by utilities, and has an adequate shape and size, sufficient access,
etc., to be a separately developable site. There are no known physical reasons why the subject site
would not support any legally probable development (i.e. it appears adequate for development).
Existing structures on similar sites provide additional evidence for the physical possibility of
development.
Financially Feasible
Potential uses of the site include various multifamily and seniors housing uses as previously detailed in
the zoning analysis. The determination of financial feasibility is dependent primarily on the relationship
of supply and demand for the legally probable land uses versus the cost to create the uses. As
discussed in the market analysis of this report, the subject’s seniors housing market is generally
stabilized. Development of new seniors housing properties has occurred in the past few years. These
factors indicate that it would be financially feasible to complete a new seniors housing project if the
site acquisition cost was low enough to provide an adequate developer’s profit.
Maximally Productive
The final test of highest and best use of the site as if vacant is that the use be maximally productive,
yielding the highest return to the land. In relation to the various uses permitted, the subject’s location
is most viable for seniors housing. Surrounding uses are complementary in nature. Hence, in the case
of the subject as if vacant, the analysis has indicated that a new seniors’ housing project would be
most appropriate.
© 2020 CBRE, Inc.

Highest and Best Use
49

Conclusion: Highest and Best Use As If Vacant
Based on the information presented above and contained in the market and neighborhood analysis,
the highest and best use of the subject as if vacant would be the development of a seniors housing
project in the near term. More specifically, the subject would be developed at a density that would
maximize the allowable unit or bed count under current zoning code. Our analysis of the subject and
its respective market characteristics indicate the most likely buyer, as if vacant, would be an investor
(land speculation) or a developer.
As Improved
Legally Permissible
The site has been improved with a seniors’ housing development that is a legal, conforming use.
Physically Possible
The layout and positioning of the improvements are considered functional for seniors housing use.
While it would be physically possible for a wide variety of uses, based on the legal restrictions and the
design of the improvements, the continued use of the property for seniors housing users would be the
most functional use.
Financially Feasible
The financial feasibility of a seniors housing community is based on the amount of rent which can be
generated, less operating expenses required to generate that income; if a residual amount exists, then
the land is being put to a productive use. Based upon the income capitalization approach conclusion,
the subject is producing a positive net cash flow and continued utilization of the improvements for
seniors housing purposes is considered financially feasible.
Maximally Productive
The maximally profitable use of the subject as improved should conform to neighborhood trends and
be consistent with existing land uses. Although several uses may generate sufficient revenue to satisfy
the required rate of return on investment and provide a return on the land, the single use that
produces the highest price or value is typically the highest and best use. As shown in the applicable
valuation sections, buildings that are similar to the subject have been acquired or continue to be used
by seniors housing owners/tenants. These comparables would indicate that the maximally productive
use of the property is consistent with the existing use as a seniors housing community.
Conclusion: Highest and Best Use As Improved
The highest and best use of the property as improved, is consistent with the existing use as a seniors
housing development.
© 2020 CBRE, Inc.

Appraisal Methodology
50

Appraisal Methodology
In appraisal practice, an approach to value is included or omitted based on its applicability to the
property type being valued and the quality and quantity of information available.
Cost Approach
The cost approach is based on the proposition that the informed purchaser would pay no more for the
subject than the cost to produce a substitute property with equivalent utility. This approach is
particularly applicable when the property being appraised involves relatively new improvements that
represent the highest and best use of the land, or when it is improved with relatively unique or
specialized improvements for which there exist few sales or leases of comparable properties.
Sales Comparison Approach
The sales comparison approach utilizes sales of comparable properties, adjusted for differences, to
indicate a value for the subject. Valuation is typically accomplished using physical units of comparison
such as price per square foot, price per unit, price per floor, etc., or economic units of comparison
such as gross rent multiplier. Adjustments are applied to the physical units of comparison derived from
the comparable sale. The unit of comparison chosen for the subject is then used to yield a total value.
Income Capitalization Approach
The income capitalization approach reflects the subject’s income-producing capabilities. This
approach is based on the assumption that value is created by the expectation of benefits to be derived
in the future. Specifically estimated is the amount an investor would be willing to pay to receive an
income stream plus reversion value from a property over a period of time. The two common valuation
techniques associated with the income capitalization approach are direct capitalization and the
discounted cash flow (DCF) analysis.
Methodology Applicable to the Subject
In valuing the subject, the sales comparison and income capitalization approaches are applicable and
have been utilized. The cost approach is not applicable in the estimation of market value due to the
age of the improvements. It is further recognized that the cost approach is not utilized by market
participants in estimating market value.
© 2020 CBRE, Inc.

Excess Land Value
51

Excess Land Value
The following map and table summarize the comparable data used in the valuation of the subject site.
A detailed description of each transaction is included in the addenda.

SUMMARY OF COMPARABLE LAND SALES (EXCESS LAND)
Actual Sale Adjusted Sale Size Size Price
No. Property Location Type Date Price Price 1 (Acres) (SF) Per SF
1 9999 USAA Boulevard, San
Antonio, Texas
Sale Apr-18 $5,311,136 $5,311,136 15.24 663,637 $8.00
2 13803 Red Maple Wood, San
Antonio, Texas
Sale Nov-18 $404,890 $404,890 1.33 57,856 $7.00
3 2726, 2727, & 2742 Danbury
Street, San Antonio, Texas
Sale Mar-19 $2,000,000 $2,000,000 5.65 246,027 $8.13
4 3611 West Loop 410, San
Antonio, Texas
Sale Jul-20 $550,000 $550,000 1.25 54,450 $10.10
Subject 1207 Jackson Keller Road,
San Antonio, Texas
— — — — 5.62 244,807 —
1 Transaction amount adjusted for cash equivalency and/or development costs (where applicable)
Compiled by CBRE
Transaction

© 2020 CBRE, Inc.

Excess Land Value
52

The sales utilized represent the best data available for comparison with the subject. These sales were
chosen based upon use, condition and quality, date of transaction, and location. Considering the size
of the seniors housing market, comparable sales outside the subject’s direct market were selected.
CBRE did attempt to select comparables located in markets with similar economic attributes as the
subject.
Discussion/Analysis of Land Sales
Land Sale One
The upward market conditions (time) adjustment reflects the improved market conditions since date of
sale. The upward adjustment for size reflects this comparable’s inferior feature with respect to its
larger size resulting in a lower price point due to the economies of scale gained with larger purchases.
The adjustment for location was warranted due to the property’s location in a high barrier market with
favorable income levels and demographic growth. Therefore, a downward adjustment was judged
proper for this comparable. Overall, this comparable was deemed superior in comparison to the
subject and a downward net adjustment was warranted to the sales price indicator.
Land Sale Two
The upward market conditions (time) adjustment reflects the improved market conditions since the
date of sale. The downward adjustment for size reflects this comparable’s superior feature with respect
to its smaller size resulting in a higher price point due to the economies of scale lost with smaller
purchases. In terms of corner, this comparable was judged superior due to superior visibility and
access and received a downward adjustment for this characteristic. The adjustment for location was
warranted due to the property’s location in a high barrier market with favorable income levels and
demographic growth. Therefore, a downward adjustment was judged proper for this comparable.
Overall, this comparable was deemed superior in comparison to the subject and a downward net
adjustment was warranted to the sales price indicator.
Land Sale Three
The upward market conditions (time) adjustment reflects the improved market conditions since the
date of sale. A downward adjustment was applied to this comparable for its superior frontage
attribute when compared to the subject, based upon the location on a major thoroughfare with high
traffic count and visibility. Overall, this comparable was deemed superior in comparison to the
subject and a downward net adjustment was warranted to the sales price indicator.
© 2020 CBRE, Inc.

Excess Land Value
53

Land Sale Four
The downward adjustment for size reflects this comparable’s superior feature with respect to its smaller
size resulting in a higher price point due to the economies of scale lost with smaller purchases. In
terms of corner, this comparable was judged superior due to superior visibility and access and
received a downward adjustment for this characteristic. A downward adjustment was applied to this
comparable for its superior frontage attribute when compared to the subject, based upon the location
on a major thoroughfare with high traffic count and visibility. Overall, this comparable was deemed
superior in comparison to the subject and a downward net adjustment was warranted to the sales
price indicator.
Summary of Adjustments
Based on our comparative analysis, the following chart summarizes the adjustments warranted to each
comparable.
LAND SALES ADJUSTMENT GRID (EXCESS LAND)
Comparable Number 1 2 3 4 Subject
Transaction Type Sale Sale Sale Sale —
Transaction Date Apr-18 Nov-18 Mar-19 Jul-20 —
Actual Sale Price $5,311,136 $404,890 $2,000,000 $550,000 —
Adjusted Sale Price 1 $5,311,136 $404,890 $2,000,000 $550,000 —
Size (Acres) 15.24 1.33 5.65 1.25 5.62
Size (SF) 663,637 57,856 246,027 54,450 244,807
Price ($ PSF) $8.00 $7.00 $8.13 $10.10
Property Rights Conveyed 0% 0% 0% 0%
Financing Terms 1 0% 0% 0% 0%
Conditions of Sale 0% 0% 0% 0%
Market Conditions 5% 5% 5% 0%
Subtotal $8.40 $7.35 $8.54 $10.10
Size 5% -10% 0% -10%
Shape 0% 0% 0% 0%
Corner 0% -10% 0% -10%
Frontage 0% 0% -10% -10%
Topography 0% 0% 0% 0%
Location -10% -10% 0% 0%
Zoning/Density 0% 0% 0% 0%
Utilities 0% 0% 0% 0%
Highest & Best Use 0% 0% 0% 0%
Total Other Adjustments -5% -30% -10% -30%
Value Indication for Subject $7.98 $5.14 $7.68 $7.07
1 Transaction amount adjusted for cash equivalency and/or development costs (where applicable)
Compiled by CBRE

© 2020 CBRE, Inc.

Excess Land Value
54

Conclusion
The comparables indicate an unadjusted range of $7.00 to $10.10 per SF with an adjusted range of
$5.14 to $7.98 per SF. The adjusted average indication of $6.97 per SF represents an approximate –
16.11% difference from the unadjusted average.
The comparables are generally similar in terms of location and use. Hence, a price per SF indication
consistent with the overall average of the range is most appropriate for the subject. The following
table presents the valuation conclusion:
CONCLUDED EXCESS LAND VALUE
$ PSF Subject SF Total
$5.14 x 244,807 = $1,258,309
$7.98 x 244,807 = $1,953,561
Indicated Value: $1,600,000
$ PSF $6.54
Less: Demolition Costs ($82,082)
Indicated Value $1,517,918
Indicated Value (Rounded) $1,520,000
(Rounded $ PSF) $6.21
Compiled by CBRE

Two buildings totaling 14,924 square feet are located on the excess land that were previously used as
office space and dormitory-type housing, but are in poor condition and are not usable. These
buildings are not being utilized currently and have no contributory value. Demolition costs have been
estimated at $5.50 per SF per MVS, resulting estimated demolition costs of $82,082.

© 2020 CBRE, Inc.

Insurable Value (Replacement Cost)
55

Insurable Value (Replacement Cost)
Insurable value is defined as follows:
1. the value of an asset or asset group that is covered by an insurance policy; can be
estimated by deducting costs of noninsurable items (e.g., land value) from market value.
2. value used by insurance companies as the basis for insurance. Often considered to be
replacement or reproduction cost plus allowances for debris removal or demolition less
deterioration and noninsurable items. Sometimes cash value or market value, but often
entirely a cost concept. 7
3. a type of value for insurance purposes. 8
CBRE, Inc. has followed traditional appraisal standards to develop a reasonable calculation based
upon industry practices and industry-accepted publications such as the Marshall Valuation Service.
The methodology employed is a derivation of the cost approach and is not reliable for insurable value
estimates. Actual construction costs and related estimates can vary greatly from this estimate.
The insurable value estimate presented herein is intended to reflect the value of the destructible
portions of the subject, based on the replacement of physical items that are subject to loss from
hazards (excluding indestructible items such as basement excavation, foundation, site work, land value
and indirect costs). In the case of the subject, this estimate is based upon the base building costs
(direct costs) as obtained via the Marshall Valuation Service handbook, with appropriate deductions.
This analysis should not be relied upon to determine proper insurance coverage, as only consultants
considered experts in cost estimation and insurance underwriting are qualified to provide an insurable
value. It is provided to aid the client/reader/user as part of their overall decision-making process, and
no representations or warranties are made by CBRE, Inc. regarding the accuracy of this estimate. It is
strongly recommended that other sources be utilized to develop any estimate of insurable value.

7 Marshall & Swift/Boeckh, LLC, Marshall Valuation Service, (Los Angeles: Marshall & Swift/Boeckh, LLC, 2010), Sec 3, p 2.
8 Appraisal Institute, The Dictionary of Real Estate Appraisal, 5th ed. (Chicago: Appraisal Institute, 2010), 102.
© 2020 CBRE, Inc.

Insurable Value (Replacement Cost)
56

INSURABLE VALUE (REPLACEMENT COST) CONCLUSION
Primary Building Type: Height per Story: 9′
Effective Age: Number of Buildings: 3
Condition: Gross Building Area: 73,917 SF
Number of Revenue Units Average Unit Size: 439 SF
Number of Stories: Average Floor Area: #VALUE!
MVS Sec/Page 0 0 0 Sec 12 / Pg 20 Sec 12 / Pg 20
Quality/Bldg. Class 0 0 0 Average / D Average / D
Building Component 0 0 0 Memory Care Assisted Living
Component Sq. Ft. 0 SF 0 SF 0 SF 11,870 SF 62,047 SF
Base Square Foot Cost $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $123.00 $123.00
Square Foot Refinements
Heating and Cooling $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 In Base In Base
Sprinklers $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $3.20 $2.55
Elevator Deduction $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 ($1.47) $0.00
Subtotal $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $124.73 $125.55
Height and Size Refinements
Number of Stories Multiplier 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00
Height per Story Multiplier 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00
Floor Area Multiplier 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.02 0.98
Subtotal $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $127.22 $123.04
Cost Multipliers
Current Cost Multiplier 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.98 0.98
Local Multiplier 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.82 0.82
Final Square Foot Cost $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $102.24 $98.87
Base Component Cost $0 $0 $0 $1,213,561 $6,134,844
Base Building Cost (via Marshall Valuation Service cost data) $7,348,405
Insurable Exclusions 10.00% of Total Building Cost ($734,841)
Insurable Value (Replacement Cost) Indication $6,613,565
Rounded $6,600,000
Value Per Rev. Unit $68,041
Compiled by CBRE
1 and 2
97
Assisted Living Residence
15 YRS
Average

© 2020 CBRE, Inc.

Sales Comparison Approach
57

Sales Comparison Approach
The following map and table summarize the comparable data used in the valuation of the subject. A
detailed description of each transaction is included in the addenda.

SUMMARY OF COMPARABLE SALES
Year Year No. Actual Sale Adjusted Price Per NOI Per
No. Name Type Date Built Renovated Rev.
U i
Price Sale Price 1 Rev. Unit 1 Occ. Rev. Unit OAR
1 Grandview of Westover Hills,
San Antonio, Texas
Sale Mar-19 2014 99 $5,600,000 $5,980,000 $60,404 49% $6,060 10.03%
2 The Village at Valley Creek,
Denton, Texas
Sale Apr-19 2009 46 $5,350,000 $5,350,000 $116,304 57% $8,648 7.44%
3 Courtyard Estates of Peoria,
Peoria, Illinois
Sale Jul-19 1970 2011 100 $8,200,000 $8,200,000 $82,000 91% $5,858 7.14%
4 Brookdale Wellington and
Bethany,
Wellington, Kansas
Sale Nov-19 1993 2016 52 $4,400,000 $4,400,000 $84,615 87% $8,866 10.48%
5 Cadence Aurora,
Aurora, Colorado
Sale Aug-20 1999 99 $10,500,000 $10,500,000 $106,061 55% $5,049 4.76%
Subj.
Pro
Forma
Ventura Hills Senior Living,
San Antonio, Texas
— — 1999 97 — — — 90% $5,588 —
1 Transaction amount adjusted for cash equivalency and/or deferred maintenance (where applicable)
Compiled by CBRE
Transaction

© 2020 CBRE, Inc.

Sales Comparison Approach
58

Given the finite amount of properties in this sector, single-asset arm’s length transfers remain limited
relative to other property types. Recognizing the impact of a property’s operating attributes on pricing,
it is appropriate to utilize comparable properties exemplifying similar operational margins to
accurately interpret pricing metrics employed by market participants. To do so, a more regional
search was performed with comparables chosen based on care level provided, operating metrics at
time of sale, and condition of the property. The sales utilized represent the best data available for
comparison with the subject.
Analysis of Improved Sales
Improved Sale One
Grandview of Westover Hills is an assisted living and memory care community situated in a suburban
location. The improvements were constructed in 2014 and are in good condition. This community has
an overall census of 49% at the time of sale. The buyer purchased the property based on an
operational value-add strategy. At sale, the property was operated by Senior Care Centers, who filled
for bankruptcy in late 2018. The community was inefficiently managed and the seller, a national REIT,
wished to exit the market. The buyer placed Silverpoint Senior Living to operate the property post
acquisition. The stabilized data was provided via the buyer and includes market-level management
and reserve. The community was purchased based on a blended cap rate and purchase price per
unit. The buyer spent $380,000 in capex post sale to update the building and replace HVAC units.
The downward market conditions (time) adjustment reflects the declining market conditions since the
date of sale. In terms of age/condition, this comparable was judged superior due to its newer year of
construction superior condition of the improvements and received a downward adjustment for this
characteristic. Overall, this comparable was deemed superior in comparison to the subject and a
downward net adjustment was warranted to the sales price indicator.
Improved Sale Two
This comparable represents the sale of a 40-unit, 46-bed stand alone memory care facility located
along Brinker Road in Denton, Texas. The residence was built on a 3.67-acre site in 2009 as an
Autumn Leaves brand property. The operator struggled to maintain stabilized occupancy due to new
supply in the surrounding areas. According to a representative of the owner, the property was sold for
a transaction price of $5,350,000, or $116,304 per revenue unit. The price implies an OAR of
7.44% based on trailing income in place at 70% average occupancy. Net operating income is down
from approximately $1,000,000 annually in 2014 and 2015.
The downward market conditions (time) adjustment reflects the declining market conditions since the
date of sale. The downward adjustment for location reflects this comparable’s superior feature with
respect to the location in a high barrier market with favorable income levels and demographic growth.
In terms of age/condition, this comparable was judged superior due to its newer year of construction
© 2020 CBRE, Inc.

Sales Comparison Approach
59

and superior condition of the improvements and received a downward adjustment for this
characteristic. Overall, this comparable was deemed superior in comparison to the subject and a
downward net adjustment was warranted to the sales price indicator.
Improved Sale Three
This comparable represents the sale of Courtyard Estates of Peoria, a 100-bed assisted living
residence located in Peoria, Illinois. According to the buyer, the actual purchase price was $8.2
million or approximately $82,000 per unit. Based on the buyer’s pro forma, this is reflective of a
9.98% capitalization rate. The OAR based on T-12 income in place was 7.14%. The asset purchase
agreement was signed April 2, 2019 by and between Peoria 23, LLC “Buyer” and Petersen Health
Systems, INC “Seller.” This supportive living community was openly marketed by a national brokerage
firm.
The downward market conditions (time) adjustment reflects the declining market conditions since the
date of sale. Overall, this comparable was deemed superior in comparison to the subject and a
downward net adjustment was warranted to the sales price indicator.
Improved Sale Four
This comparable represents the sale of two assisted living communities. Brookdale Wellington is
located in Wellington, KS, operates with 26 units, and was built in 1994 with a renovation in 2016.
Brookdale Bethany is located in Bethany, OK, operates with 26 units, and was built in 1993 with a
renovation in 2016. Both buildings are similar in style and are in good condition. The properties are
located in a suburban areas with good visibility and access with favorable access to healthcare
providers. Amenities and services offered are consistent with the competitive markets. The properties
sold for a total of $4,400,000 on November 13, 2019, or $84,615 per revenue unit. Occupancy at
the time of sale was 87% with the buyer purchasing the property based on an operational value-add.
Midwest Health assumed management of the property post acquisition, and re-branded the
communities as Homestead of Wellington and Bethany. Pricing was based on a net operating income
of $461,041, or $8,866 per revenue unit, for an overall capitalization rate 10.48% and EGIM of
1.84. The analysis is based on trailing 12 operations and include market level management fees and
replacement reserves
The downward market conditions (time) adjustment reflects the declining market conditions since the
date of sale. Overall, this comparable was deemed superior in comparison to the subject and a
downward net adjustment was warranted to the sales price indicator.
© 2020 CBRE, Inc.

Sales Comparison Approach
60

Improved Sale Five
Cadence Aurora is an assisted living and memory care community situated in a suburban location.
The improvements were constructed in 1999 and are in good condition. This community has an
overall census of 55% at the time of sale. The buyer purchased the property based on an operational
value-add strategy. The property was formerly operated by Brookdale, with Cadence taking over
operations post sale and rebranding at Cadence Aurora. The community was operating at below
stabilized occupancy levels at the time of sale, and the buyer sees potential upside operationally.
The downward adjustment for location reflects this comparable’s superior feature with respect to the
location in a high barrier market with favorable income levels and demographic growth. Overall, this
comparable was deemed superior in comparison to the subject and a downward net adjustment was
warranted to the sales price indicator.
Consideration for COVID-19
As discussed within the Market Analysis section, the COVID-19 pandemic has impacted the seniors
housing market, with reported value diminution of between 0% and 10%, from pre-COVID levels for
stabilized/near stabilized assets. Each comparable sold prior to any quantifiable adverse impact from
the pandemic and, thus, an adjustment to each comparable is warranted. In consideration of
increases in the cost of capital, expectant near-term fluctuations in cashflows, and an overall increase
in risk perception, we have applied a downward adjustment of 5% for market conditions to each
comparable. This results in a downward adjustment of 5.0% to Comparables 1 through 4 and no
adjustment to Comparable 5 given it is a post-COVID sale.
Summary of Adjustments
The sales comparison approach utilizes sales of comparable properties, adjusted for differences, to
indicate a value for the subject. Valuation is typically accomplished using physical units of comparison
such as price per square foot, price per unit, price per floor, etc., or economic units of comparison
such as gross rent multiplier. Adjustments are applied to the physical units of comparison derived from
the comparable sales. The unit of comparison chosen for the subject is then used to yield a total
value. Economic units of comparison are not adjusted, but rather analyzed as to relevant differences,
with the final estimate derived based on the general comparisons. Based on a comparative analysis,
the following chart summarizes the adjustments warranted to each comparable.
© 2020 CBRE, Inc.

Sales Comparison Approach
61

COMPARABLE SALES ADJUSTMENT GRID
Comparable Number 1 2 3 4 5
Subj.
Pro
Transaction Type Sale Sale Sale Sale Sale —
Transaction Date Mar-19 Apr-19 Jul-19 Nov-19 Aug-20 —
Year Built 2014 2009 1970 1993 1999 1999
Year Renovated 2011 2016
No. Units 99 46 100 52 99 97
Adjusted Sale Price 1 $5,980,000 $5,350,000 $8,200,000 $4,400,000 $10,500,000 —
Price Per Rev. Unit 1 $60,404 $116,304 $82,000 $84,615 $106,061 —
Occupancy 49% 57% 91% 87% 55% 90%
NOI Per Rev. Unit $6,060 $8,648 $5,858 $8,866 $5,049 $5,588
OAR 10.03% 7.44% 7.14% 10.48% 4.76% —
Adj. Price Per Rev. Unit $60,404 $116,304 $82,000 $84,615 $106,061
Property Rights Conveyed 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%
Financing Terms 1 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%
Conditions of Sale 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%
Market Conditions (Time) -5% -5% -5% -5% 0%
Subtotal – Price Per Rev. Unit $57,384 $110,489 $77,900 $80,385 $106,061
Location 0% -5% 0% 0% -15%
Project Size 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%
Age/Condition -5% -15% 0% 0% 0%
Quality of Construction 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%
Avg. Unit Size 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%
Project Amenities 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%
Parking 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%
Other 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%
Total Other Adjustments -5% -20% 0% 0% -15%
Indicated Value Per Rev. Unit $54,515 $88,391 $77,900 $80,385 $90,152
1 Transaction amount adjusted for cash equivalency and/or deferred maintenance (where applicable)
Compiled by CBRE

Price Per Unit Comparison
After applied gross adjustments of -10.00% to 25.00%, the adjusted average of all comparables
representing an approximate -14.83% difference over the unadjusted average. The adjusted indicated
value range for the sales is from $54,515 to $90,152 per unit, with an average of $78,268 per unit.
Comparables 1, 3, and 5 were the most representative of the subject in terms of operating
performance, while Comparables 1 and 3 best represent the subject in terms of location.
© 2020 CBRE, Inc.

Sales Comparison Approach
62

Effective Gross Income Multiplier Analysis
As the above analysis is heavily dependent on the net operating income of a property, the EGIM can
be applied to a property’s gross income and is therefore less dependent upon an accurate estimation
of net operating income.
The EGIM analysis compares the subject’s income characteristics with those of the comparable
properties and develops a multiplier that is appropriate for the subject. Based on our analysis, we
have concluded to an appropriate EGIM as follows:
EFFECTIVE GROSS INCOME MULTIPLIER ANALYSIS
Sale No. Occupancy OER EGIM
5 55% 83.26% 3.52
3 91% 81.44% 2.60
2 57% 80.91% 2.57
4 87% 80.75% 1.84
1 49% 70.00% 2.99
Subj. 90% 84.53% 2.00
Compiled by CBRE

For seniors housing assets, there is typically an inverse relationship between the EGIM and OER.
However, these sales are not directly following this inverse relationship. Given the range of OER and
EGIM for the comparable sales, CBRE has selected and EGIM toward the lower end of the range.
Sales Comparison Approach Conclusion
In completing this analysis, CBRE contacted various market participants that include specialty brokers
and national investors of well-known seniors housing investment funds. These participants all indicated
that in pricing the subject property, primary weight would be placed on the in-place cash flow with the
applied risk based on the amount of historical operations supporting the respective cash flows. It was
further indicated that comparable sales would be utilized as a secondary measure. These participants
advised that when selecting comparable sales for the subject, a regional search should be employed
to appropriately account for comparable operations respective to the subject property.
The following table presents the estimated value for the subject as indicated by the sales comparison
approach. The average of the two indications (paired sales and EGIM) was utilized.
© 2020 CBRE, Inc.

Sales Comparison Approach
63

SALES COMPARISON APPROACH
Paired Sales
Total Rev. Units X Value Per Rev. Unit = Value
97 X $78,268 = $7,592,036
EGIM
EGI X ANALYSIS = Value
$3,502,576 X 2.00 = $7,005,153
VALUE CONCLUSION
Indicated Stabilized Value $7,298,595
Rounded $7,300,000
Lease-Up Discount -$1,715,000
Indicated As Complete Value $5,583,595
Rounded $5,580,000
Estimated Cost to Complete -$330,344
Indicated As Is Value $5,253,250
Rounded $5,250,000
Value Per Rev. Unit $54,124
Compiled by CBRE

The cost to complete allocation has been discussed previously in this report. The lease-up discount
applied above is detailed at the conclusion of the income approach.
© 2020 CBRE, Inc.

Income Capitalization Approach
64

Income Capitalization Approach
The following map and table summarize the comparable data used in the valuation of the subject. A
description of each comparable property survey is included in the addenda.

Comp. Property Name Year LOC Community Second
No. and Location Built Total AL MC Overall AL MC AL MC $/Month Fee Res. Fee
1 1989 258 30 28 82% 80% 79% $4,299 $5,626 $330 $1,500 $400
$5,195 $880 $800
2 1998 142 96 80% 82% $2,295 $250 $1,500 $500
$4,100 $1,200
3 2016 221 64 40 88% 91% 100% $3,625 $5,995 $400 $2,000 $750
$4,995 $6,195 $1,200 $1,500
4 2011 230 60 20 100% 100% 95% $3,850 $5,400 $250 $1,500 $575
$4,950 $2,000 $2,000 $900
5 1988 293 50 24 96% 98% 96% $3,205 $4,422 $1,500
$5,211 $6,207
Subject 1999 97 80 17 52% 45% 82% $2,595 $4,150 $100 $1,750 $1,000
$3,095 $5,150 $900 $2,000
Source: CBRE VIEW Database
Census Base Rent ($/Month)
Ventura Hills Senior Living
1207 Jackson Keller Road,
San Antonio, Texas
SUMMARY OF COMPARABLE RENTALS
Rev. Units
The Forum at Lincoln Heights
311 West Nottingham Drive,
San Antonio, Texas
Brookdale Alamo Heights
855 E Basse Road,
San Antonio, Texas
Franklin Park – Alamo Heights
230 West Sunset Road,
San Antonio, Texas
Adante Senior Living
2739 Cembalo Boulevard,
San Antonio, Texas
The Village at Incarnate Word
4707 Broadway Street,
San Antonio, Texas

© 2020 CBRE, Inc.

Income Capitalization Approach
65

Comparable properties have been surveyed to identify the occupancy and rental trends within the
subject’s immediate market area. Competitive properties were identified within the subject’s defined
primary market area whereas comparable properties located outside the defined PMA were
supplemented as needed.
Analysis of Rent Comparables
Rent Comparable One
This comparable is a good quality independent, assisted, and memory care community with a 50-bed
skilled nursing facility. The improvements were constructed in 1989 and are in good condition, as the
campus was renovated in 2016. The property is located in a suburban area and affords good visibility
and access with favorable access to healthcare providers. Amenities and services offered are
consistent to the local market. The property is managed by Five Star Senior Living, a national operator
of seniors housing communities. Occupancy was reported average for the property. Assisted living
and memory care rents are based on an a base plus level-of-care structure with levels of care ranging
from $330 to $880. Management is also charging a community fee of $1,500 and a second
resident fee of $400 to $800. The community is well-established and has a good reputation.
Rent Comparable Two
This comparable is a good quality assisted living community with an attached skilled nursing facility.
The improvements were constructed in 1998 and are in good condition. The property is located in a
suburban area and affords excellent visibility and access with favorable access to healthcare
providers. Amenities and services offered are consistent to the local market. The property is managed
by Brookdale Senior Living, a national operator of seniors housing communities. Occupancy was
reported average for the property. Assisted living rents are based on a base plus level-of-care structure
with levels of care ranging from $250to $1,200. Management is also charging a community fee of
$1,500 and a second resident fee of $500.
Rent Comparable Three
This comparable is an excellent quality independent and assisted living community. The improvements
were constructed in 2016 and are in excellent condition. The property is located in a suburban area
and affords good visibility and access with favorable access to healthcare providers. Amenities and
services offered are superior to the local market. The property is managed by Franklin Park, a local
operator of seniors housing communities. Assisted living rents are based on a base plus level-of-care
structure with levels of care ranging from $400 to $1,200. Memory care rents are based on an all-
inclusive structure. Management is also charging a community fee of $2,000 and a second resident
fee of $850 for IL, $750 for AL, and $1,500 for MC.
© 2020 CBRE, Inc.

Income Capitalization Approach
66

Rent Comparable Four
This comparable is an excellent quality independent and assisted living community. The improvements
were constructed in 2011 and are in good condition. The property is located in a suburban area and
affords excellent visibility and access with favorable access to healthcare providers. Amenities and
services offered are superior to the local market. The property is managed by Sagora Senior Living, a
national operator of seniors housing communities. Occupancy was reported average for the property.
Management reported a wait list with strong demand. Assisted living rents are based on a base plus
level-of-care structure with levels of care ranging from $400 to $2,000. Memory care rents are based
on an all-inclusive less incontinence fees. Management is also charging a community fee of $1,500
to $2,000 and a second resident fee of $900 for AL and $575-$900 for IL. The facility was renovated
in 2017 and has a strong reputation in the community.
Rent Comparable Five
This comparable is a rental CCRC that offers independent living, assisted living, memory care, and a
skilled nursing facility located in a suburban area. Amenities and services offered are consistent with
the local market. The property is managed by The Village of the Incarnate Word, a local non-profit
operator. Management reported a wait list with strong demand for all care levels. Assisted living and
memory care rents are based on an all-inclusive structure. This community has a strong reputation
and typically operates near fully capacity.
© 2020 CBRE, Inc.

Income Capitalization Approach
67

Operating Summary
As shown in the following table, we were provided the trailing calendar year reporting period for 2019 (2019 reporting period is the 12
months ending January 2020) as well as the year-to-date operating data (July) which has been annualized for valuation purposes. Additionally,
we were provided the buyers pro forma through stabilization. Note that during the absorption periods, the budget utilizes annual revenue
escalations of 3.0% and annual expense escalations of 3.0%; as such, we have included the subject’s budgeted ‘Stabilized’ operating period
(Year 2), as well as trended these figures to today’s dollars, or ‘As Stabilized’, for comparison purposes. Please note that the revenue breakout
between assisted living and memory care was not provided for the historic reporting periods nor in the pro forma provided by the buyer.

© 2020 CBRE, Inc.

Income Capitalization Approach
68

Subject Rental Information
The following table shows the subject’s unit mix and quoted rental rates.
SUBJECT RENTAL INFORMATION
No. No. Unit Revenue Rev. Unit Quoted
Type Units Beds Size (SF) Units Occ. $/Rev. Unit
Assisted Living
Studio 66 66 340 – 485 66 45% $2,595 – $2,895
1 Bedroom 14 14 560 14 43% $3,095
Memory Care
Studio 17 17 315 – 570 17 82% $4,150 – $5,150
Total/Average: 97 97 439 97 52%
Compiled by CBRE

The following chart summarizes the subject’s rental rate structure, including care plan type, second
resident (person) fee, and community fee:
SUBJECT RENTAL STRUCTURE
Care Level Care Plan Type Second Resident Fee Community Fee
Assisted Living Levels Yes Yes
Memory Care All-Inclusive No Yes
Source: Property Management

Operating Revenue Analysis
Market Rent Estimate
In order to estimate the market rates, the subject unit types have been compared with similar units and
care levels. While independent living rents are typically all inclusive, assisted living and memory care
units are often rented under various rental structures. These structures range from all inclusive, base
rent plus additional charges for activity of daily living (ADL) services charged by level, or base rent plus
additional charges for ADL services charged a la carte. In order to get an accurate understanding of
the subject market position, the comparable rents have been adjusted accordingly.
Subsidized Rents
All units within the subject property are private pay.
© 2020 CBRE, Inc.

Income Capitalization Approach
69

Assisted Living
SUMMARY OF COMPARABLE RENTALS
ASSISTED LIVING STUDIO UNITS
Comparable Base $/Mo. Plan Type ADL $/Mo. Adj. $/Mo.
Brookdale Alamo Heights $2,295 – $2,985 Levels $250 – $1,200 $2,545 – $4,185
Subject (Quoted Rent) $2,595 – $2,895 Levels $100 – $900 $2,695 – $3,795
Subject (Concluded Mkt.) $2,650 Levels $500 $3,150
The Village at Incarnate Word $3,205 – $4,380 All-Inclusive $3,205 – $4,380
Franklin Park – Alamo Heights $3,625 Levels $400 – $1,200 $4,025 – $4,825
Adante Senior Living $3,850 Levels $400 – $2,000 $4,250 – $5,850
The Forum at Lincoln Heights $4,299 – $5,195 Levels $330 – $880 $4,629 – $6,075
Compiled by CBRE

SUMMARY OF COMPARABLE RENTALS
ASSISTED LIVING 1 BEDROOM UNITS
Comparable Base $/Mo. Plan Type ADL $/Mo. Adj. $/Mo.
Subject (Quoted Rent) $3,095 Levels $100 – $900 $3,195 – $3,995
Subject (Concluded Mkt.) $3,200 Levels $500 $3,700
Brookdale Alamo Heights $3,200 – $4,100 Levels $250 – $1,200 $3,450 – $5,300
The Village at Incarnate Word $4,066 – $5,148 All-Inclusive $4,066 – $5,148
Adante Senior Living $4,150 – $4,250 Levels $400 – $2,000 $4,550 – $6,250
Franklin Park – Alamo Heights $4,350 – $4,550 Levels $400 – $1,200 $4,750 – $5,750
Compiled by CBRE

The subject’s quoted rental rates are within the adjusted range indicated by the rent comparables.
Recognizing the subject’s quality and location in relation to the comparables, it is appropriate that the
subject’s rent fall at the lower end of the range.
Memory Care
SUMMARY OF COMPARABLE RENTALS
MEMORY CARE STUDIO UNITS
Comparable Base $/Mo. Plan Type ADL $/Mo. Adj. $/Mo.
Subject (Quoted Rent) $4,150 – $5,150 All-Inclusive $4,150 – $5,150
Subject (Concluded Mkt.) $4,575 All-Inclusive $4,575
Adante Senior Living $5,400 Levels $250 – $500 $5,650 – $5,900
The Forum at Lincoln Heights $5,626 Levels $330 – $880 $5,956 – $6,506
Franklin Park – Alamo Heights $5,995 All-Inclusive $5,995
The Village at Incarnate Word $6,207 All-Inclusive $6,207
Compiled by CBRE
The subject’s quoted rental rates are below the adjusted range indicated by the rent comparables.
Recognizing the subject’s quality and location in relation to the comparables, it is appropriate that the
subject’s rent fall below the range. The comparables are all either newer memory care communities
(Adante, The Forum, Franklin Park) or offer a higher acuity memory care component (The Village at
Incarnate Word). The concluded rents have been cross checked with the actual rents received per the
most recent rent roll.
© 2020 CBRE, Inc.

Income Capitalization Approach
70

Rent Adjustments
Rent adjustments can be necessary to account for differences in rental rates applicable to different
units within similar floor plans due to items such as location within the property and care provided.
However, this analysis utilizes the weighted average rental rates, considering this variance. Thus, no
rent adjustments are required.
Rent Roll Analysis
The subject’s rent roll has been analyzed and is summarized below.
Subject Asking
Most
Recent Avg.
T-6 Mo.
Avg. Min. Max. LOC Avg. Avg.
T-6 Mo.
Avg. Min. Max.
Assisted Living
Studio $2,595 – $2,895 8/19/2020 $2,621 $2,595 $1,495 $4,248 $519 $2,863 $2,862 $1,495 $4,248
1 Bedroom $3,095 7/23/2020 $3,186 $3,095 $2,195 $4,149 $250 $3,269 $3,095 $2,195 $4,149
Memory Care
Studio $4,150 – $5,150 7/23/2020 $4,337 $4,576 $3,100 $5,574 #DIV/0! $4,337 $4,576 $3,100 $5,574
Source: Property Rent Roll
RENT ROLL ANALYSIS
Total Revenue CollectedBase Contract Rent Collected

The rent roll analysis serves as a crosscheck to the estimate of market rent for the subject. The
collections shown on the rent roll include rent premiums and/or discounts.
LOSS TO LEASE ANALYSIS
Total Total
Revenue Component Monthly Rent Annual Rent
50 Occupied Rev. Units at Contract Rates $158,446 $1,901,352
47 Vacant Rev. Units at Market Rates $134,725 $1,616,700
97 Total Rev. Units @ Contract Rent $293,171 $3,518,052
97 Total Rev. Units @ Market Rent $297,475 $3,569,700
Indicated Loss-to-Lease 1.4%
Compiled by CBRE

The variation between the total annual rent reflected in the rent roll analysis and the market rent
conclusion is due to older leases that do not reflect recent increases in rental rates.
Potential Rental Income Conclusion
Within this analysis, potential rental income is estimated based upon the forward-looking market
rental rates over the next twelve months. This method of calculating rental income is most prevalent in
the local market and is consistent with the method used to derive overall capitalization rates from the
comparable sales data.
Market Rent Conclusions
The following chart shows the market rent conclusions for the subject:
© 2020 CBRE, Inc.

Income Capitalization Approach
71

Revenue Monthly Rent Annual Rent Annual
Unit Type Units $/Rev. Unit PRI $/Rev. Unit Total
Assisted Living
Studio 66 $2,650 $174,900 $31,800 $2,098,800
1 Bedroom 14 $3,200 $44,800 $38,400 $537,600
Memory Care
Studio 17 $4,575 $77,775 $54,900 $933,300
97 $3,067 $297,475 $36,801 $3,569,700
Compiled by CBRE
MARKET RENT CONCLUSIONS

Concessions
Based on our analysis of the subject’s rent roll, discussions with subject management, and discussions
with marketing directors at comparable properties, concessions were reported to be prevalent in the
local market. Typical concessions range from waiving the community fee or offering one-month’s free
rent. These concessions were considered in concluding a market rent for each of the subject’s unit
types.
Level of Care Income
A summary of level of care fees collected by the subject as well as CBRE’s stabilized projections are
presented below:
LEVEL OF CARE FEES
Year Total $/Rev. Unit $/ RD
2019 Actual $212,188 $2,188 $11.86
2020 YTD Ann. $103,099 $1,063 $5.43
Year 2 Stabilized $226,395 $2,334 $6.75
Year 2 As Stabilized $219,801 $2,266 $6.55
CBRE Stabilized Estimate $216,000 $2,227 $6.78
Compiled by CBRE

Level of care fees for the subject range from $100 to $900 with level of care fees in the market
ranging from $250 to $2,000, supporting management’s level of care charges. In review of the
subject’s rent roll, these fees are being collected. CBRE concluded to an average level of care fee of
$500 per month for assisted living.
According to the 2016 National Health Interview Survey published by the U.S. Department of Health
and Human Services, 64% of assisted living residents require assistance with at least one ADL.
However, the pricing at the subject is such that approximately 50% of the assisted living residents are
charged at least one level of care. The annual revenue indicated in the table above was derived by
applying the concluded level of care fees to the respective units, then adjusting for the ADL utilization
(50%) and vacancy.
© 2020 CBRE, Inc.

Income Capitalization Approach
72

Second Resident Fees
Second resident fees are prevalent in the market, whereby couples are charged for double occupancy.
The subject’s second resident revenue for this source is summarized below.
SECOND RESIDENT FEES
Year Total $/Rev. Unit $/ RD
2019 Actual -$27,500 -$284 -$1.54
2020 YTD Ann. $31,586 $326 $1.66
Year 2 Stabilized $31,680 $327 $0.94
Year 2 As Stabilized $30,757 $317 $0.92
CBRE Stabilized Estimate $30,240 $312 $0.95
Compiled by CBRE

Second resident fees currently charged in the market range from $400 to $1,500 per month, with
management charging a second resident fee $1,000 of per month. Given concessions on second
resident fees are typical we have concluded at a second resident fee of $700.
Standard double occupancy typically ranges from 1.05 to 1.20; this range generally varies by acuity,
with an inverse relationship between community acuity and double occupancy prevalence. By applying
the concluded second resident fee of $700 for the subject to an average double occupancy ratio of
1.05, and adjusting for vacancy, an annual revenue for this source is indicated, as reported in the
table above.
Community Fee
It is common for seniors housing properties to charge a one-time community fee at move-in. Property
management is charging a community fee for all residents. The subject’s community fee collections for
this source reported below:
COMMUNITY FEES
Year Total $/Rev. Unit $/ RD
2019 Actual $24,750 $255 $1.38
2020 YTD Ann. $47,630 $491 $2.51
Year 2 Stabilized $28,000 $289 $0.83
Year 2 As Stabilized $27,184 $280 $0.81
CBRE Stabilized Estimate $24,488 $252 $0.77
Compiled by CBRE

The market indicated range of $1,500 to $2,000 and the subject’s community fee is quoted at
$1,750 to $2,000. Since full or partial waiver of community fees is typically the first and most
common form of concession to be offered, we have considered the current level of concessions in the
market within our community fee projection, which we estimate a reasonable average community fee
at the subject is $500.
© 2020 CBRE, Inc.

Income Capitalization Approach
73

The recent The State of Seniors Housing 2018 report notes median, annual resident turnover rates as
follows:
• 37.4% for independent living
• 41.7% for independent and assisted living
• 54.1% for assisted living facilities
• 56.1% for facilities with assisted living and memory care
• 21.5% for all CCRCs (excluding skilled nursing beds)
Given the subject’s use, we have utilized an annual turnover ratio of 56.1%, or 49 unit rollovers per
year (occupied beds x 56.1%) based on CBRE’s stabilized estimate. The annual revenue for this
source can be estimated by applying the indicated unit turnover to the estimated community fee as
indicated in the table above.
Other Income
Other income includes ancillary services such as guest meals, late fees, medication management, and
other add on services. A summary of the other income fees collected by the subject as well as CBRE’s
stabilized projections are presented below:
OTHER INCOME
Year Total $/Rev. Unit $/ RD
2019 Actual $121,241 $1,250 $6.78
2020 YTD Ann. $79,838 $823 $4.21
Year 2 Stabilized $19,782 $204 $0.59
Year 2 As Stabilized $19,206 $198 $0.57
CBRE Stabilized Estimate $19,119 $197 $0.60
Compiled by CBRE

Other income includes guest meals, medication fees, pet fees, and salon revenue.
Vacancy
The subject’s estimated stabilized occupancy rate was previously discussed in the market analysis. The
concluded occupancy was applied to the subject’s unit mix in order to derive a weighted average
vacancy, as detailed below:
WEIGHTED AVERAGE ECONOMIC VACANCY
Care Level % of Total PGI Vacancy
Assisted Living 73.9% x 10.0% = 7.4%
Memory Care 26.1% x 10.0% = 2.6%
Indicated Weighted Average Vacancy (Rounded) 10.0%
Compiled by CBRE

© 2020 CBRE, Inc.

Income Capitalization Approach
74

As mentioned, the above vacancy estimate represents weighted average economic vacancy based on
potential gross income (PGI) attributable to each component while the below vacancy indications are
based on physical occupancy calculated on a resident day basis. Any disparity between the two figures
is due to the differing levels of rent for the subject’s care levels. The subject’s average vacancy is
detailed as follows:
VACANCY
Year
2019 Actual 49.5%
2020 YTD Ann. 46.4%
Year 2 Stabilized 5.2%
Year 2 As Stabilized 5.2%
CBRE Stabilized Estimate 10.0%
Compiled by CBRE

Effective Gross Income

The following table summarizes the projected gross rental and effective gross rental revenue for the
subject:

Occupancy
Care Level / Payor Annual AMR PRD (Rounded) Annual % of Total PRD
Assisted Living $2,636,400 $2,746 $74.46 90% $2,372,760 74% 74.46
Memory Care $933,300 $4,575 $26.36 90% $839,970 26% 26.36
Total / Average $3,569,700 $3,067 $100.82 90% $3,212,730 100.82
Source: Compiled by CBRE
CONCLUDED RENTAL REVENUE SUMMARY
Potential Gross Rental Income Net Rental Income

The subject’s effective gross income is detailed below which includes all revenue sources detailed in
this analysis.
EFFECTIVE GROSS INCOME
Year Total $/Rev. Unit % Change
2019 Actual $2,015,984 $20,783 —
2020 YTD Ann. $2,169,072 $22,362 8%
Year 2 Stabilized $3,767,206 $38,837 74%
Year 2 As Stabilized $3,657,481 $37,706 -3%
CBRE Stabilized Estimate $3,502,576 $36,109 -4%
Compiled by CBRE

The CBRE Stabilized estimate is slightly below management’s stabilized projections given the lower
estimated occupancy level. As detailed throughout this report, market data was extracted and utilized
in determining these estimates. Overall, the concluded effective gross income estimated by CBRE
being well supported by market extracted indications.
© 2020 CBRE, Inc.

Income Capitalization Approach
75

Operating Expense Analysis
Expense Comparables
The following chart summarizes expenses obtained from recognized industry publications and/or
comparable properties.
EXPENSE COMPARABLES
Comparable
Expense Year
GBA (SF)
Year Built
Unit Type: Rev. Units Res. Days Rev. Units Res. Days Rev. Units Res. Days
Assisted Living 91 24,917 179 47,465 43 14,800
Memory Care 0 0 43 13,457 13 4,570
Total 91 24,917 222 60,922 56 19,370
Effective Gross Income $27,920 $101.97 $24,230 $88.29 $39,740 $114.89
Expenses %/ EGI $/Rev. Unit $/RD %/ EGI $/Rev. Unit $/RD %/ EGI $/Rev. Unit $/RD
Real Estate Taxes 3.25% $908 $3.32 4.23% $1,026 $3.74 1.50% $598 $1.73
Property Insurance 2.01% 561 2.05 3.98% 965 3.52 1.38% $549 1.59
Utilities 5.23% 1,461 5.34 5.33% 1,291 4.71 3.00% $1,191 3.44
Administrative & General 23.12% 6,455 23.57 10.25% 2,483 9.05 12.56% $4,991 14.43
Marketing 5.87% 1,639 5.98 5.18% 1,255 4.57 4.87% $1,935 5.59
Resident Care 14.08% 3,932 14.36 21.08% 5,107 18.61 15.53% $6,173 17.85
Culinary Services 11.74% 3,277 11.97 12.81% 3,104 11.31 10.85% $4,311 12.46
Laundry & Housekeeping 2.71% 757 2.76 2.64% 640 2.33 1.27% $505 1.46
Repairs & Maintenance 4.86% 1,356 4.95 7.14% 1,731 6.31 3.01% $1,195 3.45
Programming 2.16% 602 2.20 2.52% 612 2.23 2.04% $810 2.34
Payroll Taxes & Benefits 8.83% 2,464 9.00 8.13% 1,970 7.18 6.72% $2,670 7.72
Operating Expenses 83.85% $23,412 $85.50 83.31% $20,186 $73.56 62.72% $24,927 $72.07
Management Fees (as % of EGI) 0.0% 0.0% 5.0%
Full Time Employee/ RD 0.45
² The median total differs from the sum of the individual amounts.
Source: CBRE VIEW Database
1974 1990 2000
50,054 125,097 33,833
2017 Actual 2017 Actual 2018 Actual
1 2 3

CBRE’s analysis and estimates of stabilized operating expenses for the subject is presented in the
following section. Operating financials for the subject as provided by property management were
considered. The property financials were juxtaposed with the market extracted operating expense data
summarized above. In analyzing operating data relative to the subject’s property type, the “per
resident day” indicator is considered the most accurate indicator.
COVID-19 Operating Expense Considerations
Expense levels have been impacted by COVID-19 for seniors housing properties. Though the level of
the impact varies by region and property type, expenses have increased since early March 2020. The
following discussion is based on conversations with market participants as well as in review of
hundreds of property operations.
Staffing expenses increased since early March from surge pay, hazard pay, temporary staffing, and
other stipends, although the impact on the overall operations have been offset by several factors. In
our discussions with operators, there is generally a consensus that while certain expenses, particularly
© 2020 CBRE, Inc.

Income Capitalization Approach
76

payroll expenses, have increased in recent months, the increase is not anticipated to be permanent.
Some operators are reporting that the increase in payroll expenses has fallen back to pre-COVID
levels, while other operators report that payroll expenses remain elevated. The consensus among
operators is that elevated payroll expenses levels are not expected to be permanent. While staffing
expenses have increased since early March 2020, from surge pay, hazard pay, temporary staffing,
and other stipends, the impact on the overall operations have been offset by several factors. Some
operators report that the existing staffing has crossed departments, filling various new needs, and that,
while payroll increases are common for certain staff, the overall effect is a net zero on total payroll
costs. The Payroll Protection Program has also offset increased expenses for operators that have
qualified. The PPP loans are reported to be a net-positive by some operators. Operators report that
increased monthly payroll expenses are budgeted at between $50 and $200/unit, with an expected
time horizon ranging from 0 to 12 months, not expected to be significant long term.
Operators report that expenses levels for PPE, testing kits, and sanitation have increased since March
2020. Reported figures vary by property type and region, but these costs are mostly reported to range
from $50 to $300 per unit on a monthly basis. Notably, these increased operational expenses, have
outpaced any offset from declines in census levels, resulting in elevated expenses on a per resident
day basis. These elevated expenses are generally expected to extend into the mid-term, or through the
end of 2020. Investors and operators also report that property and liability insurance expenses are
expected to increase through 2020. Additionally, dietary costs are elevated for some operators given
increased meat costs caused by disruptions in supply chain. Operators also report that food delivery
to individual resident units has elevated dietary supply costs.
Long-term expectations for changes in operating expenses are not currently quantifiable. Potentially,
however, elevated PPE and sanitation costs in the longer term are not likely to have significant impacts
on overall operations. Potential increased regulatory requirements on a State or Federal level as well
as elevated liability insurance, for example, pose a potential risk for increased expenses into
perpetuity. However, in our discussions with market participants, this potential threat is not
quantifiable, and not currently included within investment underwriting. The general consensus among
market participants is that short-term elevated expenses are not expected to remain long-term,
particularly for high-quality, experienced operators.
© 2020 CBRE, Inc.

Income Capitalization Approach
77

Real Estate Taxes
The real estate taxes for the subject were previously discussed. The subject’s expense is detailed as
follows:
REAL ESTATE TAXES
Year Total $/Rev. Unit $/ RD
2019 Actual $17,688 $182 $0.99
2020 YTD Ann. $56,797 $586 $2.99
Year 2 Stabilized $90,804 $936 $2.71
Year 2 As Stabilized $88,159 $909 $2.63
Expense Comparable 1 N/A $908 $3.32
Expense Comparable 2 N/A $1,026 $3.74
Expense Comparable 3 N/A $598 $1.73
CBRE Stabilized Estimate $173,660 $1,790 $5.45
Compiled by CBRE

Our conclusion is based on the analysis and discussion as presented within the Taxes and Assessment
Data section. Note that this line item includes real property tax only, with the subject’s personal
property tax included under the Administrative & General expense line item.
Property Insurance
Property insurance expenses typically include fire and extended coverage and owner’s liability
coverage. The subject’s expense is detailed as follows:
PROPERTY INSURANCE
Year Total $/Rev. Unit $/ RD
2019 Actual $120,694 $1,244 $6.75
2020 YTD Ann. $88,449 $912 $4.66
Year 2 Stabilized $61,146 $630 $1.82
Year 2 As Stabilized $59,365 $612 $1.77
Expense Comparable 1 N/A $561 $2.05
Expense Comparable 2 N/A $965 $3.52
Expense Comparable 3 N/A $549 $1.59
CBRE Stabilized Estimate $76,475 $788 $2.40
Compiled by CBRE

Insurance is a property specific expense and, therefore, we have placed primary weight on the
reported figures for our conclusion. The CBRE Estimate concludes above the buyers pro forma, as
property insurance is a line item expected to increase post COVID. The historic operating periods
rolled in other line items into property insurance such as benefits and umbrella insurance.
© 2020 CBRE, Inc.

Income Capitalization Approach
78

Utilities
Utility expenses include electricity, natural gas, water and sewer. The subject’s expense is detailed as
follows:
UTILITIES
Year Total $/Rev. Unit $/ RD
2019 Actual $128,545 $1,325 $7.19
2020 YTD Ann. $145,304 $1,498 $7.66
Year 2 Stabilized $160,968 $1,659 $4.80
Year 2 As Stabilized $156,280 $1,611 $4.66
Expense Comparable 1 N/A $1,461 $5.34
Expense Comparable 2 N/A $1,291 $4.71
Expense Comparable 3 N/A $1,191 $3.44
CBRE Stabilized Estimate $146,577 $1,511 $4.60
Compiled by CBRE

Like insurance expenses, utilities are a highly, property specific expense and we have placed primary
weight on the reported figures for our conclusion.
Administrative & General
Administrative expenses typically include legal costs, accounting, telephone, supplies, furniture,
temporary help and items that are not provided by off-site management. The subject’s expense is
detailed as follows:
ADMINISTRATIVE & GENERAL
Year Total $/Rev. Unit $/ RD
2019 Actual $313,602 $3,233 $17.53
2020 YTD Ann. $358,881 $3,700 $18.91
Year 2 Stabilized $416,107 $4,290 $12.40
Year 2 As Stabilized $403,988 $4,165 $12.04
Expense Comparable 1 N/A $6,455 $23.57
Expense Comparable 2 N/A $2,483 $9.05
Expense Comparable 3 N/A $4,991 $14.43
CBRE Stabilized Estimate $382,374 $3,942 $12.00
Compiled by CBRE

© 2020 CBRE, Inc.

Income Capitalization Approach
79

Marketing
Marketing expenses typically include all costs associated with the promotion of the subject, including
advertisements in local publications, trade publications, yellow pages, et cetera. The subject’s expense
is detailed as follows:
MARKETING
Year Total $/Rev. Unit $/ RD
2019 Actual $208,614 $2,151 $11.66
2020 YTD Ann. $196,631 $2,027 $10.36
Year 2 Stabilized $102,354 $1,055 $3.05
Year 2 As Stabilized $99,373 $1,024 $2.96
Expense Comparable 1 N/A $1,639 $5.98
Expense Comparable 2 N/A $1,255 $4.57
Expense Comparable 3 N/A $1,935 $5.59
CBRE Stabilized Estimate $95,594 $986 $3.00
Compiled by CBRE

The historic periods display marketing costs well above market levels, and it appears that line items
‘referral fees’ and ‘Leads’ totaled over $100,000 in 2020. The CBRE Estimate concludes at a similar
level to the buyer pro forma.
Resident Care
One of the more costly items involved in operating the subject property is resident care services. In
addition to departmental employees, this category includes supplies and drugs, as well as medical
and therapy fees necessary for operation. The nurse’s aides are on duty 24 hours a day during all
shifts, and also perform light housekeeping duties, serve meals, and provide personal care assistance
to the residents. The subject’s expense is detailed as follows:
RESIDENT CARE
Year Total $/Rev. Unit $/ RD
2019 Actual $735,827 $7,586 $41.14
2020 YTD Ann. $776,953 $8,010 $40.94
Year 2 Stabilized $1,028,396 $10,602 $30.64
Year 2 As Stabilized $998,442 $10,293 $29.75
Expense Comparable 1 N/A $3,932 $14.36
Expense Comparable 2 N/A $5,107 $18.61
Expense Comparable 3 N/A $6,173 $17.85
CBRE Stabilized Estimate $946,376 $9,756 $29.70
Compiled by CBRE

© 2020 CBRE, Inc.

Income Capitalization Approach
80

As discussed, Seniors Housing operators have reported increasing in staffing costs, mostly nursing
care payroll, since early March 2020. These elevated expenses include surge pay, hazard pay,
temporary staffing, and other stipends. Examples of resident care staffing increases are as follows:
• A regional operator with 2,500+/- units estimates an additional $120/unit/month on for
hourly workers were spent since March and have budgeted payroll increases through June.
• A regional operator with 2,000+/- units has spent an additional $75/unit/month on payroll
related expenses. This increase is temporary and is not included in the budget.
• Regional operator with 1,500+/- units have paid roughly $100/unit/month in staffing
incentives through May 2020. They estimate that all payroll expenses will be covered by PPP
and it will ultimately benefit their bottom line.
Operators report that increased monthly payroll expenses are budgeted at between $50 and
$200/unit, with an expected time horizon ranging from 0 to 12 months, not expected to be significant
long term.
In addition to the elevated payroll, the operators report that expenses levels for PPE and testing kits
have increased since March. These expenses mostly fall under Examples of supply increases from
COVID-19 are as follows:
• A regional skilled nursing operator with approximately 1,000 beds estimates
$50/resident/month has been spent on additional supplies.
• A regional seniors housing operator with 1,500+/- units estimates $125/unit/month has been
spent on PPE and testing kits since March.
• A regional operator showed a line item for PPE costs, supplies, and equipment in April 2020
at $45/resident/month.
It should be noted that overall increases have occurred while occupancy has declined at most
communities. These costs are generally assumed to go past the near term, and have been budgeted
through 2020 for most operators. It is unclear given the uncertainly of the pandemic if these increased
costs will be permanent. While there may be future legislative impacts from the state or federal level, it
is not currently known if this is a certainty.
The CBRE Estimate concludes at a similar level to the buyer pro forma and above the comparables
given the higher staffing required as a result of the layout of the subject (3 separate buildings).
© 2020 CBRE, Inc.

Income Capitalization Approach
81

Culinary Services
Another significant departmental expense in the operation of a seniors housing property is the dietary
department, which provides food service for the residents, guests, and employees. High quality food
and service is a priority consideration in properties such as the subject. The subject’s expense is
detailed as follows:
CULINARY SERVICES
Year Total $/Rev. Unit $/ RD
2019 Actual $371,464 $3,830 $20.77
2020 YTD Ann. $308,872 $3,184 $16.27
Year 2 Stabilized $415,787 $4,286 $12.39
Year 2 As Stabilized $403,676 $4,162 $12.03
Expense Comparable 1 N/A $3,277 $11.97
Expense Comparable 2 N/A $3,104 $11.31
Expense Comparable 3 N/A $4,311 $12.46
CBRE Stabilized Estimate $385,560 $3,975 $12.10
Compiled by CBRE

Laundry & Housekeeping
Housekeeping and Laundry expenses include the cost of supplies and miscellaneous expenses,
uniforms, and linens. The subject’s expense is detailed as follows:
LAUNDRY & HOUSEKEEPING
Year Total $/Rev. Unit $/ RD
2019 Actual $42,464 $438 $2.37
2020 YTD Ann. $46,575 $480 $2.45
Year 2 Stabilized $43,631 $450 $1.30
Year 2 As Stabilized $42,361 $437 $1.26
Expense Comparable 1 N/A $757 $2.76
Expense Comparable 2 N/A $640 $2.33
Expense Comparable 3 N/A $505 $1.46
CBRE Stabilized Estimate $41,424 $427 $1.30
Compiled by CBRE

© 2020 CBRE, Inc.

Income Capitalization Approach
82

Repairs & Maintenance
Repairs and maintenance expenses typically include all outside maintenance service contracts and the
cost of maintenance and repairs supplies. Landscaping and security expenses typically include all
outside landscaping and grounds maintenance service contracts and the cost of landscaping supplies,
as well as security services. Trash related expenses are also included in this line item. The subject’s
expense is detailed as follows:
REPAIRS & MAINTENANCE
Year Total $/Rev. Unit $/ RD
2019 Actual $232,029 $2,392 $12.97
2020 YTD Ann. $202,602 $2,089 $10.67
Year 2 Stabilized $195,029 $2,011 $5.81
Year 2 As Stabilized $189,348 $1,952 $5.64
Expense Comparable 1 N/A $1,356 $4.95
Expense Comparable 2 N/A $1,731 $6.31
Expense Comparable 3 N/A $1,195 $3.45
CBRE Stabilized Estimate $178,441 $1,840 $5.60
Compiled by CBRE

Programming
Programming includes all expenses associated with resident activities, social services, and scheduled
transportation.
PROGRAMMING
Year Total $/Rev. Unit $/ RD
2019 Actual $122,072 $1,258 $6.83
2020 YTD Ann. $59,746 $616 $3.15
Year 2 Stabilized $98,066 $1,011 $2.92
Year 2 As Stabilized $95,209 $982 $2.84
Expense Comparable 1 N/A $602 $2.20
Expense Comparable 2 N/A $612 $2.23
Expense Comparable 3 N/A $810 $2.34
CBRE Stabilized Estimate $89,221 $920 $2.80
Compiled by CBRE

© 2020 CBRE, Inc.

Income Capitalization Approach
83

Payroll Taxes & Benefits
Payroll expenses typically include all payroll and payroll-related items for all directly employed
administrative personnel. Not included are the salaries or fees for off-site management firm personnel
and services. The subject’s expense is detailed as follows:
PAYROLL TAXES & BENEFITS
Year Total $/Rev. Unit $/ RD
2019 Actual $223,227 $2,301 $12.48
2020 YTD Ann. $236,344 $2,437 $12.45
Year 2 Stabilized $256,279 $2,642 $7.64
Year 2 As Stabilized $248,815 $2,565 $7.41
Expense Comparable 1 N/A $2,464 $9.00
Expense Comparable 2 N/A $1,970 $7.18
Expense Comparable 3 N/A $2,670 $7.72
CBRE Stabilized Estimate $235,797 $2,431 $7.40
Compiled by CBRE

As a check of reasonableness, payroll taxes and benefits typically ranges between 15% and 25% of
the Total Employee Payroll for similar facilities and our conclusion, which falls around 14.9% of the
total payroll expenses, is supported by this range.
Payroll Allocation Summary
As noted, the detailed operating summary and conclusions for each department does include payroll
expenses. The following table summarizes the subject’s payroll expenses, the CBRE stabilized estimate,
and juxtaposes this information with the comparable set. The following payroll expenses have already
been included in each departmental expense estimate.
PRD PRD PRD PRD Min. Max. Avg.
Administration $5.42 $8.31 $8.06 $8.00 $4.54 $17.79 $9.68
Advertising 3.08 1.90 1.84 1.80 1.32 3.42 2.11
Culinary 9.27 5.03 4.88 4.90 6.15 6.42 6.29
Laundry & Housekeeping 2.02 1.12 1.09 1.10 1.28 2.37 1.74
Resident Care 39.17 30.28 29.40 29.40 14.25 18.12 16.63
Maintenance 4.12 2.63 2.55 2.50 0.84 1.45 1.20
Programming 2.47 2.16 2.10 2.10 0.96 1.99 1.51
Total Employee Payroll $65.54 $51.43 49.93 $49.80 $34.74 $43.95 $39.16
Payroll Taxes 7.25 4.41 4.28 4.20 2.78 4.23 3.39
Benefits 5.20 3.22 3.13 3.20 4.40 4.77 4.58
Total $77.99 $59.06 $57.34 $57.20 $41.92 $52.95 $47.12
Source: Compiled by CBRE
2020 YTD Ann. Year 2 Stabilized Year 2 As Stabilize Expense Comps.(PRD)
PAYROLL SUMMARY
CBRE Estimate

© 2020 CBRE, Inc.

Income Capitalization Approach
84

Management’s payroll expenses are above the range of comparable set given the higher staffing
model in the resident care department.
Operating Expenses
Total operating expense, exclusive of management fees and reserves, are summarized below along
with the respective comparable data:
OPERATING EXPENSES
Year Total $/Rev. Unit $/ RD
2019 Actual $2,516,226 $25,940 $140.69
2020 YTD Ann. $2,477,154 $25,538 $130.51
Year 2 Stabilized $2,868,567 $29,573 $85.47
Year 2 As Stabilized $2,785,016 $28,712 $82.98
Expense Comparable 1 N/A $23,412 $85.50
Expense Comparable 2 N/A $20,186 $73.56
Expense Comparable 3 N/A $24,927 $72.07
CBRE Stabilized Estimate $2,751,498 $28,366 $86.35
Compiled by CBRE

The CBRE estimate is slightly above the range of the expense comparables and is slightly above the
buyer pro forma, as the buyer pro forma estimated a lower real estate tax and lower property
insurance estimate with a higher overall occupancy. Overall, the CBRE Stabilized Estimate is
considered to be well supported by the comparable data presented as well as reported operating
trends reported for the subject property.
As an additional check of reasonableness, we looked to the implied expense ratios, prior to
adjustments for management and reserves. The comparables provide an expense ratio range of
62.7% to 83.9%. Overall, the subject’s indicated expense ratio, of 78.6%, falls within the comparable
range as well as is consistent with the subject’s reporting periods, providing further support for the
operating expenses conclusion.
Management Fee
Management expenses are typically negotiated as a percentage of collected revenues (i.e., effective
gross income). As reported in the 2018 SOSH report, management fees currently charged in the
market range from 3.5% to 6.5% depending upon a wide assortment of attributes ranging from size,
location, etc. When considering the subject’s operations and physical features, we conclude an
appropriate management expense is 5.00%.
© 2020 CBRE, Inc.

Income Capitalization Approach
85

Reserves for Replacement
Reserves for replacement have been estimated based on market parameters with an indicated range
of $250 to $550 per unit for comparable properties. Based on discussions with market participants
conducting property condition assessments, a wide range of reserves are reported. Mr. Sorenson, a
Senior Managing Director with CBRE assessment services reported that the average level of reserves
required based on his detailed review of hundreds of properties is approximately $350 per revenue
unit. A reserve replacement of $350 per unit has been applied to CBRE’s pro forma.
Total Operating Expense Conclusion
The concluded operating expenses inclusive of management fees and replacement reserves are
summarized as follows:
ADJUSTED OPERATING EXPENSES
Year Total $/ RD % Change
2019 Actual $2,679,295 $149.81 —
2020 YTD Ann. $2,615,191 $137.79 -2%
Year 2 Stabilized $3,090,877 $92.09 18%
Year 2 As Stabilized $3,001,840 $89.44 -3%
CBRE Stabilized Estimate $2,960,577 $92.91 -1%
Compiled by CBRE

The CBRE Stabilized operating expense is slightly above the total operating expenses indicated by the
buyer pro forma on a per resident day basis proforma. It is well supported by the market
comparables.
Net Operating Income Conclusion
The subject’s net operating income is detailed as follows:
ADJUSTED NET OPERATING INCOME
Year Total $/ RD % Change
2019 Actual -$663,311 -$37.09 —
2020 YTD Ann. -$446,119 -$23.50 -33%
Year 2 Stabilized $676,329 $20.15 -252%
Year 2 As Stabilized $655,641 $19.53 -3%
CBRE Stabilized Estimate $542,000 $17.01 -17%
Compiled by CBRE

As the revenue, occupancy, and individual operating expense line items are supported by the
historical and market data, the corresponding net operating income is considered to be well
supported.
© 2020 CBRE, Inc.

Income Capitalization Approach
86

In addition to the above analysis, we have incorporated consideration for the indicated operating
margin, based on the net operating income (EBITDAR) as a test of reasonableness. As shown within
the following table, on a national basis, operating margins for AL/MC are reported to range between
15.3% and 39.9% with a median of 28.7% Overall, the CBRE revenue and expense conclusion have
a corresponding operating margin of 15.5%; this indication is at the lower end of the range of the
market data which is considered reasonable given the concluded rents are at the lower end of the
market given the age and amenity package at the subject.
For Profit Communities Only IL IL/AL IL/AL/MC AL (no MC) AL/MC CCRC
Lower Quartile 26.8% 16.7% 18.1% 13.8% 15.3% 7.6%
Median 39.1% 33.0% 33.2% 29.3% 28.7% 24.7%
Upper Quartile 48.8% 45.2% 43.0% 41.0% 39.9% 44.5%
Source: ASHA, 2018 State of Seniors Housing Report
OPERATING MARGINS BY COMMUNITY TYPE (EBITDAR/TOTAL REVENUES)
Note: Properties are ranked by operating margin. Each quartile represents the weighted average of all properties falling in that
rank while the median reflects the average of the 5th and 6th deciles.

© 2020 CBRE, Inc.

Income Capitalization Approach
87

Direct Capitalization
Direct capitalization is a method used to convert a single year’s estimated stabilized net operating
income into a value indication. The following subsections represent different techniques for deriving
an overall capitalization rate for direct capitalization.
Comparable Sales
The overall capitalization rates (OARs) confirmed for the comparable sales analyzed in the sales
comparison approach are as follows:
COMPARABLE CAPITALIZATION RATES
Sale Sale Price
Sale Date $/Rev. Unit Occupancy OAR
1 Mar-19 $60,404 49% 10.03%
2 Apr-19 $116,304 57% 7.44%
3 Jul-19 $82,000 91% 7.14%
4 Nov-19 $84,615 87% 10.48%
5 Aug-20 $106,061 55% 4.76%
Indicated OAR: 90% 7.14%-10.48%
Source: CBRE VIEW Database

Comparable 5 was not given weight given the sale occurred with the community operated at below
stabilized occupancy and the buyer purchasing on the upside potential.
© 2020 CBRE, Inc.

Income Capitalization Approach
88

Published Investor Surveys
The results of the most recent investor surveys are summarized in the following chart.
OVERALL CAPITALIZATION RATES
Investment Type OAR Range Average
NIC
Seniors Housing — – — 7.80%
Realty Rates Investor Survey
Assisted Living — – — 8.24%
CBRE Seniors Housing Investor Survey
Standard Assisted Living
Class B: Core Locations 6.00% – 10.00% 7.23%
Class B: Non-Core Locations 6.00% – 11.00% 7.72%
Class C: Core Locations 7.00% – 11.00% 8.74%
Class C: Non-Core Locations 7.00% – 12.00% 8.98%
Assisted Living/ Memory Care
Class B: Core Locations 6.00% – 10.00% 7.59%
Class B: Non-Core Locations 6.00% – 11.00% 7.85%
Class C: Core Locations 7.00% – 11.00% 8.85%
Class C: Non-Core Locations 7.00% – 12.00% 9.00%
Indicated OAR: 7.25%-8.50%
Source: CBRE, RealtyRates.com, NIC

Band of Investment
The band of investment technique has been utilized as a crosscheck to the foregoing techniques. The
Mortgage Interest Rate and the Equity Dividend Rate (EDR) are based upon current market yields for
similar investments. With consideration of impacts from the COVID-19 pandemic, the following
changes have been noted to the lending environment since March 2020:
• Max Loan-to-Values have decreased by 5% to 10%
• Minimum DSCR requirements have increased by around 10%
• Interbank lending rates have decreased, but the floating rates have expanded by 50 to
100 bps, netting to an increase of 25 to 75 bps
• Agency lenders (Fannie/Freddie) are still active; however, these agencies have significantly
increased up-front reserves, increasing the cost of borrowed capital
• Life companies have reduced exposure to seniors housing lending, while conventional
lending via commercial banks has become more selective in their lending. Debt funds and
CMBS are less active.
© 2020 CBRE, Inc.

Income Capitalization Approach
89

• Most lenders are on “pause” due to the inability to price risk, a change from the ample
liquidity in the market pre-COVID
Noting the above post-COVID lending environment, the following Band of Investment analysis is
summarized within the following chart:
BAND OF INVESTMENT
Mortgage Interest Rate 3.75%
Mortgage Term (Amortization Period) 30 Years
Mortgage Ratio (Loan-to-Value) 70%
Mortgage Constant (monthly payments) 0.05557
Equity Dividend Rate (EDR) 13%
Mortgage Requirement 70% x 0.05557 = 0.03890
Equity Requirement 30% x 0.13000 = 0.03900
100% 0.07790
Indicated OAR: 7.80%
Compiled by: CBRE

COVID-19 Capitalization Rate Considerations
As discussed within the Market Analysis section of this report, market participants opine capitalization
rate fluctuations include a range of no change (or 0 bps) up to an increase of up to 100 bps on the
buy side; notably, transactional data is not currently available to support an adjustment. The factors
that have been identified as impacting these rates are as follows:
• In the valuation model, near through long-term impacts on census levels have been
incorporated and, thus, are not included within the capitalization rate conclusion.
• Similar to occupancy levels, a majority of elevated operating expenses have been
incorporated within the cash flow conclusions. However, long-term elevated expenses,
including potential increased regulatory requirements and/or liability insurance, etc. is not
quantifiable, and has been considered in the selection of the overall capitalization rate
selection.
• Disruptions in capital markets, with increased borrowing costs, as discussed
• Overall increased perception of risk due to market uncertainty
Capitalization rate fluctuations can vary based on location (core versus non-core, COIVD ‘Hot Spot’,
etc.) and asset class (A, B or C), with best-in-class properties falling at the lower end of the range, and
value-add properties falling at the high end. These fluctuations track with the 0% to 10% value
diminution identified and described with the Sales Comparison section of this report.
Limited transactional data is currently available to support an adjustment and market expectations are
based on hundreds of interviews conducted with buyers, sellers, operators, brokers, and capital
© 2020 CBRE, Inc.

Income Capitalization Approach
90

markets professionals active in the Seniors Housing and Care sector. If the COVID-19 Pandemic
continues to impact the overall economy beyond the near term, capitalization rates may be adversely
impacted. Notably, overall market sentiment is that, in the long term, the expectation is for overall
capitalization rates to return to pre-COVID-19 levels, as the perception of risk is reduced due to
improvement in market clarity.
Capitalization Rate Conclusion
The following chart summarizes the OAR conclusions.
OVERALL CAPITALIZATION RATE – CONCLUSION
Source Indicated OAR
Comparable Sales 7.14%-10.48%
National Investor Survey 7.25%-8.50%
Band of Investment 7.80%
CBRE Estimate 7.75%
Compiled by: CBRE

In reviewing the Capitalization Rate sources as discussed, the overall rates are stable since the
transaction dates of the Comparable Sales and the publication dates of National Investor Surveys. The
Band of Investment compared the current cost of borrowing against the pre-pandemic environment,
indicating a minimal increase. To incorporate consideration for current market conditions, we have
loaded the capitalization rate conclusion by 25 bps. The capitalization rate was increased based the
subject being a Class B/C property in a non-core market, for which market participants are indicating
a cap rate spread of 25 bps for cost of capital, as detailed in the preceding sections. The subject’s
Strengths/Opportunities and Weaknesses/Threats (SWOT) are considered, and outlined within the
following bullets:
Strengths/ Opportunities
• Good location near medical center
• Lack of new construction of similar facilities in the local market
• Positive growth in age 75+ population and households
• Operations have had limited impact from COVID
Weaknesses/ Threats
• Lease up risk
• Older product
• Strained reputation in the market given management turnover
• Poor historic operating performance
© 2020 CBRE, Inc.

Income Capitalization Approach
91

Direct Capitalization Summary
A summary of the direct capitalization at stabilized occupancy is illustrated in the following chart.
DIRECT CAPITALIZATION SUMMARY
Income Total
Potential Rent Income $3,569,700
Vacancy 10.00% (356,970)
Net Rental Income 3,212,730
Level of Care Fees $216,000
Second Resident Fees 30,240
Community Fees 24,488
Other Income 19,119
Effective Gross Income 3,502,576
Expenses
Real Estate Taxes $173,660
Property Insurance 76,475
Utilities 146,577
Administrative & General 382,374
Marketing 95,594
Resident Care 946,376
Culinary Services 385,560
Laundry & Housekeeping 41,424
Repairs & Maintenance 178,441
Programming 89,221
Payroll Taxes & Benefits 235,797
Management Fee 175,129
Reserves for Replacement 33,950
Operating Expenses $2,960,577
Operating Expense Ratio 84.53%
Net Operating Income $542,000
OAR / 7.75%
Indicated Stabilized Value $6,993,544
Rounded $6,990,000
Lease-Up Discount ($1,715,000)
Indicated As Complete Value $5,278,544
Rounded $5,280,000
Estimated Cost to Complete ($330,344)
Indicated As Is Value $4,948,200
Rounded $4,950,000
Compiled by CBRE

© 2020 CBRE, Inc.

Income Capitalization Approach
92

Discounted Cash Flow Analysis (DCF)
The DCF assumptions concluded for the subject are summarized as follows:
SUMMARY OF DISCOUNTED CASH FLOW ASSUMPTIONS
General Assumptions
Start Date Sep-20
Terms of Analysis 10 Years
Software Excel
Growth Rate Assumptions
Income Growth 2.50%
Expense Growth 2.50%
Inflation (CPI) 2.50%
Real Estate Tax Growth 2.00%
Market Rates – Year 1
Average Rent ($/Rev. Unit/Yr.) $36,801
Total Operating Expenses ($/Rev. Unit/Yr.) $30,521
Occupancy Assumptions
Current Occupancy 51.55%
Stabilized Occupancy 90.00%
Estimated Lease-up Period 24 Months
Financial Assumptions
Discount Rate 9.75%
Terminal Capitalization Rate 8.25%
Other Assumptions
Cost of Sale 2.50%
Capital Expenses (Deferred Maintenance) $330,344
Compiled by CBRE

General Assumptions
The DCF analysis utilizes a projection period of 10 Years. This is consistent with current investor
assumptions.
Growth Rate Assumptions
The inflation and growth rates for the DCF analysis have been estimated by analyzing the expectations
typically used by buyers and sellers in the local marketplace. Published investor surveys, an analysis of
the Consumer Price Index (CPI), as well as CBRE, Inc.’s survey of brokers and investors active in the
local market form the foundation for the selection of the appropriate growth rates. The compilation is
shown in the following chart.
© 2020 CBRE, Inc.

Income Capitalization Approach
93

SUMMARY OF GROWTH RATES
Investment Type Min Max Average
U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics (CPI-U) – As of December 2019
10.4-Year Snapshot Average 1.77%
PwC Survey (4Q 2019)
Apartment (National) – Proforma Rent Change 0.00% 4.00% 2.76%
Apartment (National) – Proforma Expense Change 0.00% 3.00% 2.71%
Senior Living Valuation Services Survey (2019)
Seniors Housing Annual Growth Rate – Revenues 2.00% 5.00% 3.00%
Seniors Housing Annual Growth Rate – Expenses 2.00% 4.00% 3.00%
Seniors Housing Annual Growth Rate – General Inflation 1.00% 3.00% 2.50%
Market Participants:
Current Seniors Housing Investor / Developer Proformas 2.50% 4.50% 3.00%
Source: Compiled by CBRE

Leasing Assumptions
The previously concluded pro forma income and expenses have been utilized as the basis for Year 1
of the holding period. All subsequent years vary according to the growth rate assumptions applied to
the Year 1 estimate.
Occupancy Assumptions
The occupancy rate over the holding period is based on the subject’s estimated stabilized occupancy
rate and estimated lease-up period to achieve a stabilized occupancy position.
Vacancy, Credit Loss and Absorption
Please refer to the market analysis of this report for a detailed discussion of these elements.
Discount Rate Analysis
The results of the most recent investor surveys are summarized in the following chart.
© 2020 CBRE, Inc.

Income Capitalization Approach
94

DISCOUNT RATES
Investment Type Rate Range Average
RealtyRates Investor Survey – Assisted Living
New Development 6.68% – 15.77% 10.48%
Acquisitions 5.81% – 13.72% 9.12%
Recapitalizations 6.61% – 15.61% 10.38%
Senior Housing Investment Survey
Assisted Living 8.30% – 16.00% 11.20%
Assisted Living/ Memory Care 8.30% – 17.00% 11.50%
CBRE Estimate 9.75%
Source: Senior Living Valuation Services & RealtyRates.com

The discount rate selected is above the average discount rate for assisted living per the RealtyRates
Investor Survey and within the rate range according to the Senior Housing Investment Survey, though
below the average.
Terminal Capitalization Rate
The reversionary value of the subject is based on an assumed sale at the end of the holding period
based on capitalizing the Year 11 NOI at a terminal capitalization rate. Typically, market participants
utilize a terminal capitalization rate that falls above the going-in capitalization rate (OAR); this practice
is a result of the uncertainty of future economic conditions and the natural aging of the property. The
following chart includes the reported basis point (bps) spread between the going-in capitalization rate
and the terminal capitalization rate, as reported by the CBRE Seniors Housing Investor Survey.
Spreads Between Going-In Cap Rates and Reversion Capitalization Rates
Source: CBRE Investor Survey Historical Results.
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
H2 2015 H1 2016 H1 2017 H1 2018 H1 2019 H1 2020
0 – 25 bps 25 – 50 bps 50 – 75 bps 75 – 100 bps 100 – 125 bps

As shown by the CBRE Seniors Housing Investor Survey trialing data, a vast majority of market
participants utilize a terminal rate spread 25 and 100 bps; the summed percentage of respondents
© 2020 CBRE, Inc.

Income Capitalization Approach
95

that utilize this range (25 – 100 bps) has been between 77.00% and 93.44% during the trailing survey
periods. For the subject, we have concluded a load factor of 50 basis points to be appropriate.
Discounted Cash Flow Conclusion
The DCF schedule(s) and value conclusions are depicted on the following page:
© 2020 CBRE, Inc.

Income Capitalization Approach
96

© 2020 CBRE, Inc.

Income Capitalization Approach
97

Cost to Achieve Stabilized Operations
As the majority of this report analyzes the subject As Stabilized per the proposed completion. The
respective cost to stabilize the property upon completion must be considered in order to estimate the
As Complete value. This analysis utilizes assumptions developed in the market analysis and income
capitalization approach and will be deducted as a line item from each approach in order to render an
As Complete value estimate.
As the lease up adjustment in this analysis will be used to calculate the As Complete scenario, the
lease-up calculation represents a lease-up period of 24 months, which averages 1.6 units per month,
required to stabilize the subject. During this period, the subject will incur rent loss on vacant units. The
rent loss due to vacancy is straight-lined to stabilize per the concluded absorption rate.
Variable expenses make up a considerable amount of a property’s operating expenses, with one of
the larger variable expenses being staffing. However, as a property nears stabilization, a community is
typically operating at nearly full staffing operating capacity. At the subject’s current occupancy, any
variation in expenses would be expected to be off-set by any increased marketing efforts. Additionally,
we have included a 10.00% profit line item to account for the entrepreneurial incentive.
LEASE UP DISCOUNT
Indicated Lease-Up Discount
Rounded
Compiled by CBRE
$1,714,761
$1,715,000

Note that annual escalations are not applied as this is a lump-sum deduction applied to ‘stabilized’
value conclusions. Additionally, this analysis includes negative cashflows. Thus, a discount rate has
not been applied. This methodology is summarized as follows:
© 2020 CBRE, Inc.

Income Capitalization Approach
98

LEASE UP DISCOUNT SCHEDULE
Month 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
AS-STABILIZED
Potential Rental Income $297,475 $297,475 $297,475 $297,475 $297,475 $297,475 $297,475 $297,475 $297,475 $297,475 $297,475 $297,475
Loss to Lease $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Concessions $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Adjusted Rental Income $297,475 $297,475 $297,475 $297,475 $297,475 $297,475 $297,475 $297,475 $297,475 $297,475 $297,475 $297,475
Vacancy (%) 10.0% 10.0% 10.0% 10.0% 10.0% 10.0% 10.0% 10.0% 10.0% 10.0% 10.0% 10.0%
Vacancys ($) ($29,748) ($29,748) ($29,748) ($29,748) ($29,748) ($29,748) ($29,748) ($29,748) ($29,748) ($29,748) ($29,748) ($29,748)
Net Rental Income $267,728 $267,728 $267,728 $267,728 $267,728 $267,728 $267,728 $267,728 $267,728 $267,728 $267,728 $267,728
Other Income $24,154 $24,154 $24,154 $24,154 $24,154 $24,154 $24,154 $24,154 $24,154 $24,154 $24,154 $24,154
Effective Gross Income $291,881 $291,881 $291,881 $291,881 $291,881 $291,881 $291,881 $291,881 $291,881 $291,881 $291,881 $291,881
Total Expenses ($246,715) ($246,715) ($246,715) ($246,715) ($246,715) ($246,715) ($246,715) ($246,715) ($246,715) ($246,715) ($246,715) ($246,715)
Net Operating Income $45,167 $45,167 $45,167 $45,167 $45,167 $45,167 $45,167 $45,167 $45,167 $45,167 $45,167 $45,167
AS-IS
Potential Rental Income $297,475 $297,475 $297,475 $297,475 $297,475 $297,475 $297,475 $297,475 $297,475 $297,475 $297,475 $297,475
Loss to Lease (Above Market) 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%
Concessions During Lease Up 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%
Adjusted Rental Income $297,475 $297,475 $297,475 $297,475 $297,475 $297,475 $297,475 $297,475 $297,475 $297,475 $297,475 $297,475
Vacancy (%) 48.5% 46.9% 45.2% 43.6% 42.0% 40.4% 38.8% 37.2% 35.6% 34.0% 32.4% 30.8%
Vacancys ($) ($144,137) ($139,371) ($134,605) ($129,839) ($125,072) ($120,306) ($115,540) ($110,774) ($106,007) ($101,241) ($96,475) ($91,709)
Net Rental Income $153,338 $158,104 $162,870 $167,636 $172,403 $177,169 $181,935 $186,701 $191,468 $196,234 $201,000 $205,766
Other Income $13,834 $14,264 $14,694 $15,124 $15,554 $15,984 $16,414 $16,844 $17,274 $17,704 $18,134 $18,564
Effective Gross Income $167,171 $172,368 $177,564 $182,760 $187,956 $193,153 $198,349 $203,545 $208,741 $213,938 $219,134 $224,330
Total Expenses (0% Variable) ($246,715) ($246,715) ($246,715) ($246,715) ($246,715) ($246,715) ($246,715) ($246,715) ($246,715) ($246,715) ($246,715) ($246,715)
Net Operating Income ($79,543) ($74,347) ($69,151) ($63,955) ($58,758) ($53,562) ($48,366) ($43,170) ($37,973) ($32,777) ($27,581) ($22,385)
NOI Differential $124,710 $119,514 $114,317 $109,121 $103,925 $98,729 $93,532 $88,336 $83,140 $77,944 $72,747 $67,551
Sub-Total $124,710 $119,514 $114,317 $109,121 $103,925 $98,729 $93,532 $88,336 $83,140 $77,944 $72,747 $67,551
Plus: Profit @ 10.00% $12,471 $11,951 $11,432 $10,912 $10,392 $9,873 $9,353 $8,834 $8,314 $7,794 $7,275 $6,755
Total Lease-Up Cost $137,181 $131,465 $125,749 $120,033 $114,317 $108,602 $102,886 $97,170 $91,454 $85,738 $80,022 $74,306

© 2020 CBRE, Inc.

Income Capitalization Approach
99

LEASE UP DISCOUNT SCHEDULE, Cont’d.
Month 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24
AS-STABILIZED
Potential Rental Income $297,475 $297,475 $297,475 $297,475 $297,475 $297,475 $297,475 $297,475 $297,475 $297,475 $297,475 $297,475
Loss to Lease $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Concessions $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Adjusted Rental Income $297,475 $297,475 $297,475 $297,475 $297,475 $297,475 $297,475 $297,475 $297,475 $297,475 $297,475 $297,475
Vacancy (%) 10.0% 10.0% 10.0% 10.0% 10.0% 10.0% 10.0% 10.0% 10.0% 10.0% 10.0% 10.0%
Vacancys ($) ($29,748) ($29,748) ($29,748) ($29,748) ($29,748) ($29,748) ($29,748) ($29,748) ($29,748) ($29,748) ($29,748) ($29,748)
Net Rental Income $267,728 $267,728 $267,728 $267,728 $267,728 $267,728 $267,728 $267,728 $267,728 $267,728 $267,728 $267,728
Other Income $24,154 $24,154 $24,154 $24,154 $24,154 $24,154 $24,154 $24,154 $24,154 $24,154 $24,154 $24,154
Effective Gross Income $291,881 $291,881 $291,881 $291,881 $291,881 $291,881 $291,881 $291,881 $291,881 $291,881 $291,881 $291,881
Total Expenses ($246,715) ($246,715) ($246,715) ($246,715) ($246,715) ($246,715) ($246,715) ($246,715) ($246,715) ($246,715) ($246,715) ($246,715)
Net Operating Income $45,167 $45,167 $45,167 $45,167 $45,167 $45,167 $45,167 $45,167 $45,167 $45,167 $45,167 $45,167
AS-IS
Potential Rental Income $297,475 $297,475 $297,475 $297,475 $297,475 $297,475 $297,475 $297,475 $297,475 $297,475 $297,475 $297,475
Loss to Lease (Above Market) 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%
Concessions During Lease Up 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%
Adjusted Rental Income $297,475 $297,475 $297,475 $297,475 $297,475 $297,475 $297,475 $297,475 $297,475 $297,475 $297,475 $297,475
Vacancy (%) 29.2% 27.6% 26.0% 24.4% 22.8% 21.2% 19.6% 18.0% 16.4% 14.8% 13.2% 11.6%
Vacancys ($) ($86,942) ($82,176) ($77,410) ($72,644) ($67,877) ($63,111) ($58,345) ($53,579) ($48,812) ($44,046) ($39,280) ($34,514)
Net Rental Income $210,533 $215,299 $220,065 $224,831 $229,598 $234,364 $239,130 $243,896 $248,663 $253,429 $258,195 $262,961
Other Income $18,994 $19,424 $19,854 $20,284 $20,714 $21,144 $21,574 $22,004 $22,434 $22,864 $23,294 $23,724
Effective Gross Income $229,526 $234,723 $239,919 $245,115 $250,311 $255,508 $260,704 $265,900 $271,096 $276,293 $281,489 $286,685
Total Expenses (0% Variable) ($246,715) ($246,715) ($246,715) ($246,715) ($246,715) ($246,715) ($246,715) ($246,715) ($246,715) ($246,715) ($246,715) ($246,715)
Net Operating Income ($17,188) ($11,992) ($6,796) ($1,600) $3,597 $8,793 $13,989 $19,185 $24,382 $29,578 $34,774 $39,970
NOI Differential $62,355 $57,159 $51,962 $46,766 $41,570 $36,374 $31,177 $25,981 $20,785 $15,589 $10,392 $5,196
Sub-Total $62,355 $57,159 $51,962 $46,766 $41,570 $36,374 $31,177 $25,981 $20,785 $15,589 $10,392 $5,196
Plus: Profit @ 10.00% $6,235 $5,716 $5,196 $4,677 $4,157 $3,637 $3,118 $2,598 $2,078 $1,559 $1,039 $520
Total Lease-Up Cost $68,590 $62,875 $57,159 $51,443 $45,727 $40,011 $34,295 $28,579 $22,863 $17,148 $11,432 $5,716
© 2020 CBRE, Inc.

Income Capitalization Approach
100

Conclusion of Income Capitalization Approach
The conclusions via the valuation methods employed for this approach are as follows:
As Is As Complete As Stabilized
September 22, 2020 November 22, 2020 November 22, 2022
Direct Capitalization Method $4,950,000 $5,280,000 $6,990,000
Discounted Cash Flow Analysis $4,960,000 $5,290,000 $7,010,000
Reconciled Value $4,960,000 $5,290,000 $7,000,000
Compiled by CBRE
INCOME CAPITALIZATION APPROACH VALUES

Direct capitalization is typically utilized in estimating a market value for stabilized properties, the
discounted cash flow analysis recognizes the changes in cash flows over the holding period of an
asset. In this case, equal emphasis has been placed on both indications in concluding a market value
for the subject. This methodology is considered to best reflect the actions of buyers and sellers
currently active in this market.

© 2020 CBRE, Inc.

Reconciliation of Value
101

Reconciliation of Value
The value indications from the approaches to value are summarized as follows:
As Is As Complete As Stabilized
September 22, 2020 November 22, 2020 November 22, 2022
Sales Comparison Approach $5,250,000 $5,580,000 $7,300,000
Income Capitalization Approach $4,960,000 $5,290,000 $7,000,000
Reconciled Value $4,960,000 $5,290,000 $7,000,000
Compiled by CBRE
SUMMARY OF VALUE CONCLUSIONS

In the sales comparison approach, the subject is compared to similar properties that have been sold
recently or for which listing prices or offers are known. The sales used in this analysis are considered
comparable to the subject, and the required adjustments were based on reasonable and well-
supported rationale. In addition, market participants are currently analyzing purchase prices on
investment properties as they relate to available substitutes in the market. Therefore, the sales
comparison approach is considered to provide a reliable value indication but has been given
secondary emphasis in the final value reconciliation.
The income capitalization approach is applicable to the subject since it is an income producing
property leased in the open market. Market participants are primarily analyzing properties based on
their income generating capability. Therefore, the income capitalization approach is considered a
reasonable and substantiated value indicator and has been given primary emphasis in the final value
estimate.
Based on the foregoing, the market value of the subject has been concluded as follows:
MARKET VALUE CONCLUSION
Appraisal Premise Interest Appraised Date of Value Value Conclusion
As Is – Going Concern Fee Simple Estate September 22, 2020 $4,960,000
As Stabilized – Going Concern Fee Simple Estate November 22, 2022 $7,000,000
Excess Land Value Fee Simple Estate September 22, 2020 $1,600,000
Compiled by CBRE
Under the As Complete and As Stabilized scenarios, these values represent prospective values which
are based on forward-looking projections that are based on current market indications and typical
underwriting witnessed by market participants as of the effective date. It is noted that the COVID-19
pandemic is causing heightened uncertainty in both local and global market conditions. Any
significant change in future market conditions that are inconsistent with the assumptions made herein
could impact the opinions of market value.

© 2020 CBRE, Inc.

Allocation of the Going Concern
102

Allocation of the Going Concern
This “going concern” value of the fee simple in the subject property includes value attributable to
furniture, fixtures, and equipment (FF&E), business operation, and the real property. According to the
Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice, Standards Rule 1-2(e), it is necessary to “identify
and consider the effect on value of any personal property, trade fixtures or intangible items that are
not real property but are included in the appraisal.” The subject property contains elements of all three
types of values: real property, intangible items (or business value), and personal property. Hence, the
going-concern or business value must be separated from the real estate value. In doing so, this
analysis employs the lease coverage method.
Lease Coverage Analysis
A lease coverage ratio (LCR) analysis can be utilized to allocate the going concern of the fee simple
interest. To calculate the real estate value component, a market derived lease coverage ratio is
applied to the concluded net operating income for the subject. The result is an indicated annual
market lease payment for the subject. Market participants utilize this method to value the real
property. REITs and other buyers of seniors housing properties also utilize this methodology to
determine market rent. Hence, this method is considered to best reflect actions taken by actual market
participants in allocating business value for the subject’s property type.
For lease coverage rate selection support, we have included the following datasets. The following
chart includes lease coverage ratios as derived by seniors housing community lease transactions:
© 2020 CBRE, Inc.

Allocation of the Going Concern
103

Property / Portfolio Type Units State NOI/Unit Lease Date Rent/Unit LCR
Oakmont of Chino Hills AL/MC 123 CA $23,593 Jul-14 $19,106 1.23
HealthLease Properties AL/NC 365 Multiple $14,041 Apr-14 $11,233 1.25
Sun City West MC 48 AZ $30,000 Apr-14 $23,077 1.30
Arbors of Winthrop AL 90 MA $23,076 May-14 $17,778 1.30
Olympia Manor NC 28 CA $16,179 Aug-14 $10,786 1.50
Holiday Portfolio IL 2,850 Multiple $13,779 Sep-14 $10,614 1.30
CareTrust REIT AL, MC 90 ID $14,847 Oct-14 $11,333 1.31
Prelude at Woodbury MC 30 MN $26,000 Jan-15 $20,000 1.30
Transitional Care Portfolio TCF 678 MD $40,165 Jun-15 $30,199 1.33
Liberty Healthcare Corp. IL/AL/NC 1,200 OH $19,583 Nov-15 $14,294 1.37
GA SNF NC 105 GA $10,679 Jan-15 $7,628 1.40
Infinity Portfolio SNF 702 TN & KY $13,394 Aug-16 $10,256 1.31
Priority Mgt. Portfolio AL/NC 568 TX $22,711 Dec-16 $15,141 1.50
West Texas SNF Portfolio SNF 519 TX $9,776 Sep-17 $6,901 1.42
Central Wisconsin SC Portfolio IL/AL/SNF 215 WI $8,691 Mar-18 $8,199 1.06
Pinnacle Senior Housing AL/MC 75 TX $22,265 Jul-18 $15,475 1.44
Colorado Springs SNF SNF 80 CO $25,116 Jul-18 $19,101 1.31
Colorado Grand SNF SNF 80 CO $36,054 Jul-18 $19,867 1.81
Arizona SNF SNF 96 AZ $30,562 Jul-18 $18,273 1.67
Missouri SNF Portfolio SNF 1,112 MO $12,520 Sep-18 $6,861 1.82
Michigan ALF Portfolio AL 162 MI $28,593 Dec-18 $23,679 1.21
St. James Place AL 22 GA $5,727 Jul-19 $4,091 1.40
Tarzana & Valley View AL 81 CA $24,586 Oct-19 $15,460 1.59
Family Initiative Residences IL/AL 38 GA $9,032 Oct-19 $6,947 1.30
Max: 1.82
Mean: 1.39
Min: 1.06
Source: Compiled by CBRE
SENIORS HOUSING LEASE COVERAGE RATIOS

For additional support for lease coverage ratios, the following dataset is comprised of lease coverage
ratios as recently reported by REITs for portfolios of assets:
© 2020 CBRE, Inc.

Allocation of the Going Concern
104

Property / Portfolio Type Units Period Ending: LCR
WellTower REIT Seniors Portfolio IL/AL 1,656 Sep-19 1.21
WellTower REIT SNF Portfolio SNF 1,882 Sep-19 1.54
NHI REIT – Holiday Portfolio IL 2,925 Nov-18 1.25
NHI REIT – Seniors Housing Portfolio IL/AL/SNF — Dec-19 1.08
NHI REIT – Skilled Nursing Portfolio SNF — Dec-19 2.59
Sabra Health Care REIT SNF Portfolio SNF 33,879 Sep-19 1.24
Sabra Health Care REIT SH Portfolio IL/AL/MC 4,011 Sep-19 1.07
Ventas REIT SH Portfolio IL/AL/SNF 42,801 Sep-19 1.17
Omega REIT Core Assets SNF 6,590 Jun-19 1.30
Total Dataset Range / Mean: Max: 2.59
Mean: 1.38
Min: 1.07
Source: Compiled by CBRE
SENIORS HOUSING REIT PORTFOLIO LEASE COVERAGE RATIOS

As part of the recent CBRE Seniors Housing Investor Survey (H1 2020), market participants were
asked to opine as to lease coverage ratio expectations for each acuity level. The following dataset
includes the indicated range, based on a vast majority of respondent indications; i.e. 79.5% or more
of respondents provided a lease coverage ratio expectation that falls within the indicated range.
Property Type / Care Level % of Respondents Indicated Range
Active Adult 79.5% 1.00 – 1.30
Independent Living 87.7% 1.10 – 1.50
Assisted Living 91.0% 1.20 – 1.60
Memory Care 86.2% 1.20 – 1.60
Skilled Nursing 80.0% 1.30 – 1.90
CCRC / LPC 82.9% 1.20 – 1.60
Max: 1.90
Min: 1.00
CBRE INVESTOR SURVEY LEASE COVERAGE RATIOS
Source: CBRE H1 2020 Investor Survey Results.

As shown, lease coverage ratios for seniors housing assets range from 1.06 to 2.59, with a majority
of ratios ranging from 1.10 to 1.90. In consideration of the subject’s acuity level, for purposes of this
analysis, a coverage ratio of 1.55 was used. The inferred rent is assumed to be on an absolute net
basis with no expenses to the lessor. Furthermore, the market rent is based upon a long-term lease of
20+ years, which is common. These terms are common for this property type.
© 2020 CBRE, Inc.

Allocation of the Going Concern
105

The next step is estimating an absolute net lease capitalization rate. The results of the 2019 CBRE
Healthcare Real Estate Investor & Developer Survey are summarized as follows, relative to
capitalization rates for absolute net leased healthcare properties:

Absolute net transactions for seniors housing and similar (medical) net leased properties are
summarized below:
Property / Portfolio Type Units State Lease Date
Sale Price
Per Unit
Fee Simple
Cap Rate
Leased Fee
Cap Rate
Basis Point
Spread
ILC Portfolio IL 3,138 Multiple Oct-13 $251,753 7.25% 6.20% 105
Confidential Transaction AL 120 WI Nov-13 $168,333 9.30% 7.75% 155
HealthLease Properties AL/NC 365 Multiple Apr-14 $135,342 10.37% 8.30% 207
Sun City West MC 48 AZ Apr-14 $333,333 9.00% 6.92% 208
Oakmont of Chino Hills AL/MC 123 CA Jun-14 $390,244 6.05% 4.90% 115
Holiday Portfolio IL 2,850 Multiple Sep-14 $192,982 7.14% 5.50% 164
CareTrust REIT AL, MC 90 ID Oct-14 $133,333 11.14% 8.50% 264
Prelude at Woodbury MC 30 MN Jan-15 $240,000 10.83% 8.33% 250
GA SNF NC 105 GA Apr-15 $79,048 13.51% 9.65% 386
Transitional Care Portfolio TCF 678 MD Jun-15 $345,133 11.64% 8.75% 289
Liberty Healthcare Corp. IL/AL/NC 1,200 OH Nov-15 $147,500 13.28% 9.69% 359
Infinity Portfolio SNF 702 TN & KY Aug-16 $105,257 12.72% 9.74% 298
Priority Mgt.Portfolio AL/NC 568 TX Dec-16 $168,838 13.45% 8.97% 448
West Texas Skilled Nursing SNF 519 TX Sep-17 $76,676 12.75% 9.00% 375
Central Wisconsin SC Portfolio IL/AL/SNF 215 WI Mar-18 $105,116 8.27% 7.80% 47
Pinnacle Senior Housing AL/MC 75 TX Jul-18 $260,000 8.56% 5.95% 261
Colorado Springs SNF SNF 80 CO Jul-18 $263,750 9.52% 7.24% 228
Arizona SNF SNF 96 AZ Jul-18 $241,042 12.68% 7.58% 510
Michigan ALF Portfolio AL 162 MI Dec-18 $345,679 8.27% 6.85% 142
Tarzana & Valley View AL 81 CA Oct-19 $283,951 8.66% 5.44% 321
Family Initiative Residences IL/AL 38 GA Oct-19 $81,579 11.07% 8.52% 255
Min: 47
Max: 510
Mean: 257
Source: Compiled by CBRE
SENIORS HOUSING NET LEASE TRANSACTIONS

© 2020 CBRE, Inc.

Allocation of the Going Concern
106

Net leased transactions typically yield a capitalization rate ranging from 50 to 500 basis points below
the fee simple cap rate. Note that for the subject As Complete, the property will be undergoing an
absorption period; thus, we have increased the capitalization rate for this scenario to account for
perceived risk associated with a lease-up period.
The final step is applying the concluded lease coverage ratio and absolute net capitalization rate to
the estimated NOI for the subject. By capitalizing the indicated annual lease payment, a leased fee
value or value allocation of the real estate only is determined. The business value is the difference in
the going concern and the inferred leased fee or real property value, as summarized below.
As Is As Complete As Stabilized
September 22, 2020 November 22, 2020 November 22, 2022
Concluded Stabilized NOI $542,000 $542,000 $542,000
Divided Lease Coverage Ratio 1.55 1.55 1.55
Cash Flow to the Real Estate $349,677 $349,677 $349,677
Real Estate Only Cap Rate 7.75% 7.50% 6.75%
Indicated Real Estate Value $4,511,964 $4,662,363 $5,180,406
Concluded Market Value of the Going Concern $4,960,000 $5,290,000 $7,000,000
FF&E $546,000 $546,000 $546,000
Inferred Real Estate Value $4,511,964 $4,662,363 $5,180,406
Indicated Business Value -$97,964 $81,637 $1,273,594
Compiled by CBRE
LEASE COVERAGE ANALYSIS

Furniture, Fixtures and Equipment
Furniture, fixtures and equipment (FF&E) costs have been estimated in order to allocate the going
concern. In estimating costs for FF&E, numerous developers have been consulted as well as property
owners. The following table outlines budgeted FF&E in new construction.
© 2020 CBRE, Inc.

Allocation of the Going Concern
107

Property Type # of Units $/ Unit
AL/MC 68 $5,926
AL/MC 67 $7,458
AL/MC 104 $9,832
AL/MC 78 $9,615
AL/MC 70 $12,857
AL/MC 86 $7,558
AL/MC 101 $8,510
AL/MC 85 $10,659
AL/MC 52 $7,596
AL/MC 92 $9,674
AL/MC 99 $8,692
AL/MC 88 $9,545
AL/MC 106 $8,019
AL/MC 120 $8,333
Weighted Average: — $8,903
Source: Compiled by CBRE
FF&E COST SUMMARY

Given the degree of construction and quality associated with the subject property, combined with its
size, an FF&E cost estimate of $7,500 per unit, or $728,000 (rounded) is considered reasonable the
subject. Depreciation is applied below.
Based on our physical inspection of the property, the following depreciation was applied to the FF &
E, for the concluded contributory value detailed below.
Cost New per Unit $7,500 $728,000
Percentage of Units furnished with FF&E 100%
Cost New of FF&E $728,000
Effective Age 2 Years
MVS Expected Life 8 Years
Remaining Economic Life 6 Years
Less: Incurable Physical Deterioration 25.0%
Contributory Value of FF&E $546,000
Compiled by CBRE
FF&E VALUE ESTIMATE

Notably, for the subject As Stabilized, the property would have undergone an absorption period.
However, depreciation does not typically occur in a linear fashion, and the subject would not be fully
occupied during the absorption period. Therefore, the FF&E is expected to have incurred a limited
amount of depreciation, and none is applied to the FF&E under the As Stabilized scenario.
© 2020 CBRE, Inc.

Allocation of the Going Concern
108

Allocation of the Going Concern Conclusion
By utilizing the concluded business value detailed above, an allocation of the going concern has been
estimated as follows:
As Is As Complete As Stabilized
September 22, 2020 November 22, 2020 November 22, 2022
Real Estate $4,414,000 $4,662,363 $5,180,406
FF & E $546,000 $546,000 $546,000
Business Value $0 $81,637 $1,273,594
Market Value of the Going Concern $4,960,000 $5,290,000 $7,000,000
Compiled by CBRE
ALLOCATION OF THE GOING CONCERN

© 2020 CBRE, Inc.

Assumptions and Limiting Conditions
109

Assumptions and Limiting Conditions
1. CBRE, Inc. through its appraiser (collectively, “CBRE”) has inspected through reasonable observation the subject
property. However, it is not possible or reasonably practicable to personally inspect conditions beneath the soil and the
entire interior and exterior of the improvements on the subject property. Therefore, no representation is made as to such
matters.
2. The report, including its conclusions and any portion of such report (the “Report”), is as of the date set forth in the letter
of transmittal and based upon the information, market, economic, and property conditions and projected levels of
operation existing as of such date. The dollar amount of any conclusion as to value in the Report is based upon the
purchasing power of the U.S. Dollar on such date. The Report is subject to change as a result of fluctuations in any of
the foregoing. CBRE has no obligation to revise the Report to reflect any such fluctuations or other events or conditions
which occur subsequent to such date.
3. Unless otherwise expressly noted in the Report, CBRE has assumed that:
(i) Title to the subject property is clear and marketable and that there are no recorded or unrecorded matters or
exceptions to title that would adversely affect marketability or value. CBRE has not examined title records (including
without limitation liens, encumbrances, easements, deed restrictions, and other conditions that may affect the title or
use of the subject property) and makes no representations regarding title or its limitations on the use of the subject
property. Insurance against financial loss that may arise out of defects in title should be sought from a qualified title
insurance company.
(ii) Existing improvements on the subject property conform to applicable local, state, and federal building codes and
ordinances, are structurally sound and seismically safe, and have been built and repaired in a workmanlike manner
according to standard practices; all building systems (mechanical/electrical, HVAC, elevator, plumbing, etc.) are in
good working order with no major deferred maintenance or repair required; and the roof and exterior are in good
condition and free from intrusion by the elements. CBRE has not retained independent structural, mechanical,
electrical, or civil engineers in connection with this appraisal and, therefore, makes no representations relative to the
condition of improvements. CBRE appraisers are not engineers and are not qualified to judge matters of an
engineering nature, and furthermore structural problems or building system problems may not be visible. It is
expressly assumed that any purchaser would, as a precondition to closing a sale, obtain a satisfactory engineering
report relative to the structural integrity of the property and the integrity of building systems.
(iii) Any proposed improvements, on or off-site, as well as any alterations or repairs considered will be completed in a
workmanlike manner according to standard practices.
(iv) Hazardous materials are not present on the subject property. CBRE is not qualified to detect such substances. The
presence of substances such as asbestos, urea formaldehyde foam insulation, contaminated groundwater, mold, or
other potentially hazardous materials may affect the value of the property.
(v) No mineral deposit or subsurface rights of value exist with respect to the subject property, whether gas, liquid, or
solid, and no air or development rights of value may be transferred. CBRE has not considered any rights associated
with extraction or exploration of any resources, unless otherwise expressly noted in the Report.
(vi) There are no contemplated public initiatives, governmental development controls, rent controls, or changes in the
present zoning ordinances or regulations governing use, density, or shape that would significantly affect the value of
the subject property.
(vii) All required licenses, certificates of occupancy, consents, or other legislative or administrative authority from any
local, state, nor national government or private entity or organization have been or can be readily obtained or
renewed for any use on which the Report is based.
(viii) The subject property is managed and operated in a prudent and competent manner, neither inefficiently or super-
efficiently.
(ix) The subject property and its use, management, and operation are in full compliance with all applicable federal, state,
and local regulations, laws, and restrictions, including without limitation environmental laws, seismic hazards, flight
patterns, decibel levels/noise envelopes, fire hazards, hillside ordinances, density, allowable uses, building codes,
permits, and licenses.
(x) The subject property is in full compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). CBRE is not qualified to
assess the subject property’s compliance with the ADA, notwithstanding any discussion of possible readily achievable
barrier removal construction items in the Report.
(xi) All information regarding the areas and dimensions of the subject property furnished to CBRE are correct, and no
encroachments exist. CBRE has neither undertaken any survey of the boundaries of the subject property nor reviewed
or confirmed the accuracy of any legal description of the subject property.
© 2020 CBRE, Inc.

Assumptions and Limiting Conditions
110

Unless otherwise expressly noted in the Report, no issues regarding the foregoing were brought to CBRE’s attention, and
CBRE has no knowledge of any such facts affecting the subject property. If any information inconsistent with any of the
foregoing assumptions is discovered, such information could have a substantial negative impact on the Report.
Accordingly, if any such information is subsequently made known to CBRE, CBRE reserves the right to amend the Report,
which may include the conclusions of the Report. CBRE assumes no responsibility for any conditions regarding the
foregoing, or for any expertise or knowledge required to discover them. Any user of the Report is urged to retain an
expert in the applicable field(s) for information regarding such conditions.
4. CBRE has assumed that all documents, data and information furnished by or behalf of the client, property owner, or
owner’s representative are accurate and correct, unless otherwise expressly noted in the Report. Such data and
information include, without limitation, numerical street addresses, lot and block numbers, Assessor’s Parcel Numbers,
land dimensions, square footage area of the land, dimensions of the improvements, gross building areas, net rentable
areas, usable areas, unit count, room count, rent schedules, income data, historical operating expenses, budgets, and
related data. Any error in any of the above could have a substantial impact on the Report. Accordingly, if any such
errors are subsequently made known to CBRE, CBRE reserves the right to amend the Report, which may include the
conclusions of the Report. The client and intended user should carefully review all assumptions, data, relevant
calculations, and conclusions of the Report and should immediately notify CBRE of any questions or errors within 30
days after the date of delivery of the Report.
5. CBRE assumes no responsibility (including any obligation to procure the same) for any documents, data or information
not provided to CBRE, including without limitation any termite inspection, survey or occupancy permit.
6. All furnishings, equipment and business operations have been disregarded with only real property being considered in
the Report, except as otherwise expressly stated and typically considered part of real property.
7. Any cash flows included in the analysis are forecasts of estimated future operating characteristics based upon the
information and assumptions contained within the Report. Any projections of income, expenses and economic
conditions utilized in the Report, including such cash flows, should be considered as only estimates of the expectations
of future income and expenses as of the date of the Report and not predictions of the future. Actual results are affected
by a number of factors outside the control of CBRE, including without limitation fluctuating economic, market, and
property conditions. Actual results may ultimately differ from these projections, and CBRE does not warrant any such
projections.
8. The Report contains professional opinions and is expressly not intended to serve as any warranty, assurance or
guarantee of any particular value of the subject property. Other appraisers may reach different conclusions as to the
value of the subject property. Furthermore, market value is highly related to exposure time, promotion effort, terms,
motivation, and conclusions surrounding the offering of the subject property. The Report is for the sole purpose of
providing the intended user with CBRE’s independent professional opinion of the value of the subject property as of the
date of the Report. Accordingly, CBRE shall not be liable for any losses that arise from any investment or lending
decisions based upon the Report that the client, intended user, or any buyer, seller, investor, or lending institution may
undertake related to the subject property, and CBRE has not been compensated to assume any of these risks. Nothing
contained in the Report shall be construed as any direct or indirect recommendation of CBRE to buy, sell, hold, or
finance the subject property.
9. No opinion is expressed on matters which may require legal expertise or specialized investigation or knowledge beyond
that customarily employed by real estate appraisers. Any user of the Report is advised to retain experts in areas that fall
outside the scope of the real estate appraisal profession for such matters.
10. CBRE assumes no responsibility for any costs or consequences arising due to the need, or the lack of need, for flood
hazard insurance. An agent for the Federal Flood Insurance Program should be contacted to determine the actual need
for Flood Hazard Insurance.
11. Acceptance or use of the Report constitutes full acceptance of these Assumptions and Limiting Conditions and any
special assumptions set forth in the Report. It is the responsibility of the user of the Report to read in full, comprehend
and thus become aware of all such assumptions and limiting conditions. CBRE assumes no responsibility for any
situation arising out of the user’s failure to become familiar with and understand the same.
12. The Report applies to the property as a whole only, and any pro ration or division of the title into fractional interests will
invalidate such conclusions, unless the Report expressly assumes such pro ration or division of interests.
13. The allocations of the total value estimate in the Report between land and improvements apply only to the existing use
of the subject property. The allocations of values for each of the land and improvements are not intended to be used
with any other property or appraisal and are not valid for any such use.
14. The maps, plats, sketches, graphs, photographs, and exhibits included in this Report are for illustration purposes only
and shall be utilized only to assist in visualizing matters discussed in the Report. No such items shall be removed,
reproduced, or used apart from the Report.
© 2020 CBRE, Inc.

Assumptions and Limiting Conditions
111

15. The Report shall not be duplicated or provided to any unintended users in whole or in part without the written consent of
CBRE, which consent CBRE may withhold in its sole discretion. Exempt from this restriction is duplication for the internal
use of the intended user and its attorneys, accountants, or advisors for the sole benefit of the intended user. Also exempt
from this restriction is transmission of the Report pursuant to any requirement of any court, governmental authority, or
regulatory agency having jurisdiction over the intended user, provided that the Report and its contents shall not be
published, in whole or in part, in any public document without the written consent of CBRE, which consent CBRE may
withhold in its sole discretion. Finally, the Report shall not be made available to the public or otherwise used in any
offering of the property or any security, as defined by applicable law. Any unintended user who may possess the Report
is advised that it shall not rely upon the Report or its conclusions and that it should rely on its own appraisers, advisors
and other consultants for any decision in connection with the subject property. CBRE shall have no liability or
responsibility to any such unintended user.
© 2020 CBRE, Inc.

Addenda

ADDENDA
© 2020 CBRE, Inc.

Addenda

ADDENDUM A
Comparable Data Sheets
© 2020 CBRE, Inc.

���� ����� �
���
���
�����
����
�� ������������������ ����������� !��”������!�#�$ ��”%%��## &&&&�’$””�(�)��*��%$�!�”!��! �+�,-�./012′! ��%�$����#3�*��!��!��,�4�”5�!6� (�4��3�*�78,�4�9: ;;/00<� ��=>�?�@�A������B����
��� “6��# $C)����D���E�!%�”������� <;70F; GGF+GF.E�!%�"����3��## <;70F; GGF+GF.$ ���:�*������!��$���)# H�I$J��� 9���5)���,���5���J� 3�!�������E�*��'� � � �# "����*� ��K��L�4 �)��M"H �8"L !�E�!%����(�%5�H�� � �8"L�4 �)��:�!# �� 0<7;F�����6M��!��5��: #��!6�8$����� �8"'$""�(�)��*��%3�!��������! L)�� ND�� ��$��6 D 6����! ����������� !���"������!�#O�! !5 LMNFFP!� �����!��$���)# �8"�������AA�@QH�6��%�%�()��� RS������������ !��+�EES L��T�� !5�, �� �8",�)��()��� RS������������ !��+�EES ()����,��� �� *����9!*�#���H�6��%�%�$����� E��S�!�����:�*������!��S����!�+�EES $������,��� :�*������,�)��$����� E��S�!�����:�*������!��S����!�+�EES �� �����U�� D 6�� �! $������(��T��9!����#��,��!#D����% M���$ ����8M���J��% ,��� $���S)���!��'#� U�6�!��E�!% :��� 180802(��-0?@,9,2/3�93@93�3′)��)>3��,/3�0 �!A�%+�,-93��0 �/,’5�,)�$$$$�&B..�408/3C,95�(‘�’09)>13�)�B,’�.’)0′(0#�=3D,����=>3��()3�>,��,’�(99368/,9��>,@3�1()>�63’39,//E�/3C3/�)0@069,@>E�,’5�’0� /005@/,(‘F�()�(��@90@0�35� 09�)>3�*%�G8′()�H,/?3))0�H0(‘)3�.@,9)?3’)��1>(->�,93��3)�)0�23�-0?@/3)35�(‘�%�%����=>3�/3,�(‘6�0 (-3�(��@/,”35�)0�0@3’�(‘�I8/E�%�!$�1>3’� (9�)�?0C3G(‘�93,5E�,@,9)?3′)��,93�3D@3-)35�)0�23�,C,(/,2/3���.//�8)(/()(3��,93�,C,(/,2/3�)0�)>3��()3��=>3�@90@39)E�(��/0-,)35�,)�)>3� 90′)�3′)9,’-3�0 �&B..�>3,5J8,9)39��(‘�-/0�3�@90D(?()E�)0�KLG!�#�M00@�+!�#�,’5�M00@�!”�+�,’5�1()>(‘��(D�?(/3��0 �&=B.�B,’�.’)0′(0#�B08)>�=3D,��N35(-,/�O3′)39#�,’5�=>3�B>0@��,)�M,�O,’)39,���=>3�@90@39)E��0/5�(‘�.@9(/�%�!�� 09��A#*!!#!*”#�09�������@39��J8,93� 00)��M36,/�53�-9(@)(0’P�7O4�!+”$Q�4MR�MS=�HG*”O
© 2020 CBRE, Inc.

���� ����� �
������
����������� ������������������ !”�#$��%����&�’�(��)��*��’#”��%% +,-+�&�’�(��)��*��’.�/�#/��/0�1�23�4,5″67/0��’�.����%8�9��/��/��2�:�#;�/$� <�:��8�9�!=2�:�>? (@)�0�)�����
A�B��������
�CD������E #$��% .F@����G���H�/’�#������� !+5, I41,IJH�/’�#����8��%% !+5, I41,IJ.0���?�9�)����/��.���@% &�K.L��� >���;@)��2���;���L� 8�/���))��H�9�)7�0)0�0�% #))(�:0�@��M#& �=#(0/�H�/’����<)';�&��0� �=#(�:0�@��?�/%0�� �=#M��/��;��?0%��/$�=.����� �=#&�'�(��)��*��'M��/��;��?0%��/$�=.����� �=#?��N�9�)��&��'8�/���)��)�/ �=#.��$0G0$��)�/ �=#N�/0/; OP5�Q�OP+R/�0�)���/��.���@% �=#������D����S&�$��'�'�<@��� &R?�(#�HR�*TT?�HHO (��U��0/;�20�� 5"�(�/�LV%W2�@��<@��� �=# <@����2��� ��09����>/9�%���&�$��’�’�.�))�� .X#Y#�T�OT&�T&#2>T� .�))���2��� ��09����>/9�%���2�@��.�))�� �=# ��0�����Y��0G0$��0�/ H0%�0/;�<��U��>/����%��2��/%G����’ �=# 2��� .�)�O@���/��7%� 7/’�9�)���’ ?��� =+-=5- ,�����%�’�7%� O�����$0�)=&���0) .�)����0$� Z”-“1,6-H0%�0/;�<��U�� H@U��H�8��/'�V5 -W�,"+PI,I+ M0/�/$0/; O�%L����.�))��.�))0/;�<��U�� �=# O�%L�RF@09�)�/� Z"-"1,6-?�$�[ 5- ,-5+J" , O��0��)�#'\@%���/� Z-#'\@%��'���0$� Z"-"1,6-]���E��������D����S�̂�DE�_�B� ̀�����a b�c��d�e�E���S]���E�������f���]���E�������]Ŝ� aDS�� ������ g���� g���� ������� Eh =5- , .�)� &R?�(#�HR�*TT?�HHO .X#Y#�T�OT&�T&#2>T� Z”-“1,6- Z+-“1,” �=�Z4!–
© 2020 CBRE, Inc.

���� ����� �
������
����������� ��������������������������������� !�”���#$%&�’�()*(+�+(���,- !�”��”../0,1.2�3.45��#$%&�!�”��36%.4%$5�”72,8�������� �����������������������9���:��������� ;<%��-/=>,7,1.2�72>72�2$&��&<2��,.2�/ �,�+�''?,-72�&7,-&�/ �72&,%.�-/==27-%,.�.,$4�./-,&24�,&�+'*�'�@24�A,>.2�B//4�%$�C,$�”$&/$%/)�;D��;<2�&7,-&�-/$�%�&��/ �(��2>,7,&2�>,7-2.��%��,$4�%77256.,7�%$��<,>2�,$4�52$27,..E�.2F2.�&<7/6527��L6,72� //&�
© 2020 CBRE, Inc.

���� ����� �
������
����������� ������������������ �!�”��#�”$%&'()*�+!��,+$$��,, -.-(/�-.-./�0�-.)-�1�”23���4�����4�”�+”��”5�/�67�.*-8.9″5��$�4����,:�;��”��”��6�<�+=�"!� >�<��:�;�'?6�<�@1 &AAABC/�&AAA)B/�&AAA))���� D�E�������� �FG������H +!��, 4I3����J���#�"$�+������� &'()* -)(/A-.#�"$�+����:��,, &'()* -)(/A-.45���1�;�K����"��4���3, L�M4N��� @���=3K��6���=���N� :�"���KK��#�;�K9�5K5�5�, +KKO�<5�3��P+L �?+O5"�#�"$����>K$=�L��5� �?+O�<5�3��1�",5�� �?+P��"��=��15,��"!�?4����� �?+1�"23���4�����:�"���K��K�" �?+4��!5J5!��K�" �?+Q�"5"= R%-S"�5�K���"��4���3, �?+������G����TL�!��$�$�>3��� O��K,�U”�VN��K,�4�”�+”��”5� O��W��5″=�65�� �?+6�3��>3��� 4��� >3����6��� S”$�9,��L�!��$�$�4�KK�� S$=���0�O�<5"��O��WM��$� 4�KK���6��� ��5;����@";�,���6�3��4�KK�� S$=���0�O�<5"��O��WM��$� ��5����� ��5J5!��5�" O#4?>��W��@”����,��6��”,J����$ P���45��K�?P���N�K$ 6��� 4�K�R3���”��9,� �!�”��#�”$ 1��� B?–?-A8C�����,�$�9,� R�����!5�K 4�K����5!� X-/AAA/AAA#5,�5″=�>��W�� 4�3�N�6�<�,�L��K���4��;5!�,%43Y�""��O�"5!W P5"�"!5"= +KK�R�,N4�KK5"=�>��W�� �?+ R�,N�SI35;�K�”� X-/AAA/AAA1�!�Z -A8CAA&B8.8 R��5��K�+$[3,���”� XA+$[3,��$���5!� X-/AAA/AAA\���H��������G����T�]�GH�̂�E� _�����̀
a�b��c�d�H���T\���H�������e���\���H�������\T]� G̀T�� ������ f���� f����
�������
HgAB?-A8C 4�K� O��K,�U”�VN��K,�4�”�+”��”5� S$=���0�O�<5"��O��WM��$� X-/AAA/AAA XB&)/8A*�?�X*'8B © 2020 CBRE, Inc. ���� ����� � ������ ����������� �������������������������������� ! "�#���$%&'��()*�+,�-(���./ "�#��#0012.304�5067��$%&' "�#��58&06&%7�#94.:�������� �����������������������;���<��������� =>& �/1?@.9.304�94@94 4%’ �’>4� .04�1!�(�-)�A./94 �01/.’46�&%�%19’>4. ‘�B.%�#%’1%&1��=>4�@91@49’C�& �74%49.00C�04D40*�& �E1%46�FAG*�.%6�& �%1’�01/.’46�&%�.�!0116�@0.&%��=>4�@91@49’C� 106�&%�H.9/>�G+�I�!19�.�94@19’46��G*+++*+++*�19�������@49� J8.94�!11’�
© 2020 CBRE, Inc.

���� ����� �
������
����������� ������������������ !”#�$%��&$”��&& () �*�&��+����, -.�/�$/��/0�1�23�45″”67/0��’�.����&8�9��/��/��2�:�$;�/%� <�:��8�9�!=2�:�>? @AB�0�B�����
C�D��������
�EF������G $%��& .HA����I���+�/’�$������� !”#- #,1,#-+�/’�$����8��&& !”#- #,1,#-.0���?�9�B����/��.���A& �B����’.J��� >���;AB��2���;���J� @�’������.B���7�0B0�0�& $BB@�:0�A��K$L �=$@0/�+�/’����/����&��2��/&I����’ K���.0��B�=K���J�B’ 2��� .�B�NA���/��7&� 7/’�9�B���’ ?��� 4=”6=”-“-�����&�’�7&� N�����%0�B .�B����0%� V##-1—+0&�0/;�<��S�� +�/'�/�W�/�OK0�&��$���0%�/�" -O,6)O444# K0/�/%0/; �=$.�BB0/;�<��S�� �=$ N�&J�PHA09�B�/� V##-1---?�%�X "-"- )5")6 N��0��B�$'YA&���/� V-$'YA&��'���0%� V##-1---Z���G��������F����Q�[�FG�\�D� ]�����̂ _�̀��a�b�G���QZ���G�������c���Z���G�������ZQ[� F̂Q�� ������ d���� d���� ������� Ge-4="-"- .�B� 8R���%0I0%�N��� T2�.�A�J�++N V##-1--- V,,-1---�=�V -! - © 2020 CBRE, Inc. ���� ����� � ������ ����������� ���������������������������������� !�"���#$%&�''�(���������)* !�"��"++,-).+/�0+12��#$%&�!�"��03%+1%$2�"4/)5�������� �����������������������6���7��������� 89%��*,:;)4).+/�%��)���<=�)*4/�&4)*&�, �*,::/4*%)+�+)$1�+,*)&/1�)+,$2�&9/�$,4&9�+%$/�, �!>�?,,;�’���@3�&�/)�&�, �A4/1/4%*B�.342�C,)1��89/��%&/�%��,-$/1�.D�E3%B84%;�)$1�%���34;+3��;4,;/4&D�&,�&9/�*,$F/$%/$*/��&,4/�&9/D�-%++�./�.3%+1%$2�)&�&9/�9)41�*,4$/4�, �?,,;�’���)$1�A4/1/4%*B�.342�C,)1��89/��%&/�9)��)$�%44/23+)4��9);/(�:,1/4)&/+D��+,;%$2�&,;,24);9D(�)++�3&%+%&%/�(�%��$,&�%$�)� +,,1�G,$/�)$1�%��G,$/1�HI<��J&�9)�� 4,$&)2/�,$�!>�?,,;�’���)$1�)�;4%F)&/�4,)1(�%$*+31%$2�&9/�9)41�*,4$/4�, �&9/�&-,�
© 2020 CBRE, Inc.

���� ������
��� ��

����

���
������� ���
���������
���� ���� !”�#
�$
%�&��!��
‘”((&) ��&& *+,-
.�/�&” �
���/#��0��
)����”�1
23
-*,456�”��
0����&��!�������
2�7
)8��9� :�7����!�;<2�7 => ?5@,ABCCCBCC++����
D�E�� F
GD
H
I�
.��
)��� 5;,5C
�9 J���
:K”(� ,C?4���&&
:K”( “�8
)���
L�:)M5+15CC
&$ J���
N���!��� �<)2���( 6�"�& *A :K"( "�8& ?2���( :� & AA O(��� P�K�� ?2���( N�!��K� 6�"�& AA P�� "�"�� ��� =�!�&����� P(�&& ) P��&��K9�"�� P(�&& >
B
%��
$����1
$(���
��
&��K9�K��Q
9��&” ���
9��RK&�”R(�
����
D�E��
��SS��TD�E�� U��V W�X I�� ��� Y�E����
U��V Z[[�\��[T Y� �X��V
Y�V��). -? -? 6�”�& -? 4,] �<)^P ?* ,* :� & ,* +*] �<)_�V�� à aa aa bac ��� � I�dD�E�� e��E�V� e�TI�X�[��X I�X�[��� ZVf��). ?CC] �<) �<) �<)^P ?CC] �<) �<) �<) GS���V�� ������(g O����( >“�”�81
0�(��6�”�
0��9″$”9g
,4B’�K�
N�&���&�
0�&�������
��SS��TN�9�� �
:K��� N�8��9�
=’0
�$
.�/�&” �
).
..P ^��/��”�8
2″�� �<)2�K� :K��� h�K���� P��"��( :K��� 2��� ��"!��� =�!�&���N�9�� � 0�((�� 0�R�� 2�7�& '�( "�8& .� 0�((�� 2��� Ni=22�K� 0�((�� 0�R�� '��(�j9��� Ni=2 ��"���� k��"$"9��"�� :K���=�����&� 2���&$���� O�� 0"��(���� @<,-<,C?A�����&� 6&� �<) 0�(� ��"9� l51+CC1CCC."&�"�8 :��/�� �<) O"���9"�8 ^��/�� N��� O"���9"�80�(("�8 :��/�� �<) P�&j imK"!�(��� l51+CC1CCC>�9
n ,C?ACC5A?*5 P��”��(
) oK&����� l@*C1CCC) oK&��
��”9� l51A*C1CCC_��� �[V���
��SS��T
\��
p�E��q���
�WYr
s��t
�� V��T_��� �[V���
u�V�_��� �[V���
_T\� W�T�� ������ e��[� �� f
rv��E����V
e��[�w xC@<,C?A 0�(� N�8��9� ='0 �$ .�/�&" � ). ..P 0�R�� 2�7�& '�( "�8& .� l51+CC1CCC lAA;?, © 2020 CBRE, Inc. ���� ������ ��� �� � ���� � ��� ������� ��� ����� �� ������� �������� ��� !"�" #$�%&' ()& *&)+� ,���-� �.$'/ ���0� 1��02���! �� �� $ 34560!$)7" ()�+�)! ��� !"�" ()��$ ,()�+�)! 8��� &9 :&+2�)�"&�/ ;99 <)&"" =�� #0 � ,;<=#/ >?44@$�
=�����
A�$ ‘B:�2?
C��$DE?EF5 ()��$
B
C$G$�0$
8��� HIEJ3E3()&K$��$’
=CC @B�L����M���C$G$�0$
N!2$ ()&
*&)+�
���-� �.$'($)�&’
;�’��O D>BFDB>E>D�&0)�$ @B�()��$ HPJ4QEJEEE1��02���! QP5C$”�’$��
R�!” FESDP;99$���G$
<)&"" =��&+$ H>JEEEJEEE;T2$�”$” HDJ3EEJEEE@$�
12$)����O
=��&+$ HIEEJEEE@1=BC$G$�0$
8��� HIJEID1;C SE?EE5;<=# >?44@$�
=�����
A�$ ‘B:�2?
C��$ DE?EF5U��

������� <)��'G�$V &9 W$"�&G$) X� " �" �� �""�"�$' �G��O ��' +$+&)! ��)$ �&++0���! "��0��$' �� � "0-0)-�� &����&�? N%$ �+2)&G$+$��" V$)$ �&�"�)0��$' �� >ED3
��’
�)$
��
O&&’
�&�’���&�?
N%�”
�&++0���!
%�”
��
&G$)�
�$�”0″
&9
345
��
�%$
��+$
&9
“� $?
N%$
-0!$)
20)�%�”$’
�%$
2)&2$)�!
-�”$’
&�
��
&2$)���&��
G� 0$Y�”
“�)��$O!?
��
“� $J
�%$
2)&2$)�!
V�”
&2$)��$’
-!
�$��&)
:�)$
:$��$)”J
V%&
9� $’
9&)
-��Z)02��!
��
��$
>EDQ?
N%$
�&++0���!
V�”
��$99���$�� !
+���O$’
��’
�%$
“$ $)J

����&��
C;=NJ
V�”%$’
�&
$T��
�%$
+�)Z$�?
N%$
-0!$)
2 ��$’
�� G$)2&���
�$��&)
[�G��O
�&
&2$)��$
�%$
2)&2$)�!
2&”�
��\0�”���&�?
N%$
“��-� �.$’
‘���
V�”
2)&G�’$’
G��
�%$
-0!$)
��’
��� 0’$”
+�)Z$�Y $G$
+���O$+$��
��’
)$”$)G$?
N%$
�&++0���!
V�”
20)�%�”$’
-�”$’
&�

– $�’$’
��2
)��$
��’
20)�%�”$
2)��$
2$)
0���?
N%$
-0!$)
“2$��
HFQEJEEE
��
��2$T
2&”�
“� $
�&
02’��$
�%$
-0� ‘��O
��’
)$2 ��$
X]�:
0���”?
© 2020 CBRE, Inc.

���� ������
��� ��

����

���
������� ���
���������
���� ���
!””�#�
��
�””��
$���%&”��(( )*+*
,�!-%��
.��’/�-��-0
�1
23)+45-!��’
6����(7�8��-��-�
��9
&#�-:� /�-��-7�8�;<��9 =/ 3))24>����
?�@�� A
B�
C�-‘
&��� D;32E
�: F���
,G!”� )++H7��((
,G!”‘!-#
&���
I7,&J)*0*4E
(K F���
.�-�8���’ �<&����" 5-!�( >+ ,G!”‘!-#( E����”
,�'( >3 L”���
$�G-� E����”
.�8�-G�
5-!�( >3 $�-‘!�!�- 7��’=-8�(���-�
$”�(( , $�-(��G:�!�-
$”�(( /
M
N��’
K����0
K”���
�-‘
(��G:�G��O
:�-(!’���’
:��PG(�!P”�
����
?�@��
��QQ��R?�@�� S��T U�V B�� ��� W�@����
S��T XYY�Z��YR W� �V��T
W�T��[$ >+ >3 ,�'( >3 *H\ �<&]�T�� _̂ ^̀ ^̀ abc ��� � B�d?�@�� e��@�T� e�RB�V�Y��V B�V�Y��� XTf��[$ E++\ �<& �<& �<& gQ���T�� 7�-���"h L����" /!-!-#0 [�!" .���0 C!P����5-!� 6��:!K!:h ��!8��� ,���0 =-'!8!'G�" &!� $�-���"0 )>Mi�G�
.�(��-(�
6�(�������
��QQ��R.�:��’�’
,G��� 6iE
�””��
$���%
CC$ [��%��!-#
�!�� �<&��G� ,G��� 5-'!(:"�(�' ,G��� ���� ��!8��� =-8�(���.�:��'�' 6�""�� /�-��- [����� $���0 CC$ 6�""�� ���� ��!8��� =-8�(�����G� 6�""�� &G�G�- C��8�(<��� C�6�""� 7��G� ��!���� ��!K!:��!�- 6�""��=-����(� ���-(K����' L�� 6!��"�H33) $��!��”
&’nG(���-� j+&’nG(��’
��!:� j*0D*+0+++]��� �YT���
��QQ��R
Z��
o�@��p���
�UWq
r��s
�� T��R]��� �YT���
t�T�]��� �YT���
]RZ� U�R�� ������ e��Y� �� f
qu��@����T
e��Y�v w+><)+EH 6�"� 6iE �""�� $���% CC$ /�-��- [����� $���0 CC$ j*0D*+0+++ j)+H;E>
© 2020 CBRE, Inc.

���� ������
��� ��

����

���
������� ���
�����
��
������� ��������
��� !”�”
#$�%&’ ()�� ��*
���+� ” ���+�
,��+-���!
��
�� $ ./01+!$)2″
3)�4�)!
��� !”�” ������
5�-��� �6���&�
��� !”�” 788
9)&””
:��
#+ �
;79:#< =>./?$�
:�����
@�$ ‘A5�->
B��$/>CC0 3)��$
A
B$D$�+$
E��� FGGHIJKC3)&L$��$’
:BB ?A�M����N���B$D$�+$
(!-$ ()�� ��*
���+� “3$)�&’
7�’��* =A=OA=KGP�&+)�$ �$ $)3)��$ F.IJ.KIKKK,��+-���! /K0B$”�’$��
Q�!” GG/.J788$���D$
9)&””
:��&4$ F=IKOCIJCC7R-$�”$” FGIHOHI.=C?$�
,-$)����*
:��&4$ FJP/IOGP?,:AB$D$�+$
E��� FOIHCO,7B OK>PG079:# =>./?$�
:�����
@�$ ‘A5�->
B��$ />CC0S��

������� (%�”
�&4-�)�T $
)$-)$”$��”
�%$
“� $
&8

CKU+���I
CHUT$’
“���’
� &�$
4$4&)!
��)$
8��� ��!
&���$’
� &�*
1)��V$)
B&�’
��
Q$��&�I
($R�”>
(%$
)$”�’$��$
W�”
T+� �
&�

J>H/U��)$
“��$
��
=KKP
�”
��
�+�+4�
X$�D$”
T)��’
-)&-$)�!>
(%$
&-$)��&)
“�)+** $’
�&
4�������
“��T� �6$’
&��+-���!
‘+$
�&
�$W
“+– !
��
�%$
“+))&+�’��*
�)$�”>
���&)’��*
�&

)$-)$”$�����D$
&8
�%$
&W�$)I
�%$
-)&-$)�!
W�”
“& ‘
8&)

�)��”����&�
-)��$
&8
F.IJ.KIKKKI
&)
FGGHIJKC
-$)
)$D$�+$
+���>
(%$
-)��$
�4- �$”
��
,�B
&8
/>CC0
T�”$’
&�
�)�� ��*
���&4$
��
– ��$
��
/K0
�D$)�*$
&��+-���!>
?$�
&-$)����*
���&4$
�”
‘&W�
8)&4
�–)&R�4��$ !
FGIKKKIKKK
���+� !
��
=KGC
��’
=KG.>
© 2020 CBRE, Inc.

���� ������
��� ��

����

���
������� ���
���������
���� ��������
!”����”
�#
����$�% ��”” &&’
����(
)�”���*
%+�*������$�,
-.
/&/012*$��
3����”4�+��*��*�
5�6
%7�*8� �9%4�+�:95�6
-; &<=0'=><&=0&1���� ?�@�� A B? .�* %��� C:C'0 �8 D��� E�$F� &G'04��"" E�$F $*7 %��� H4E%I&&0,J&C "# D��� K�*�+��� >0&&5���F
2*$�” &00 E�$F $*7″ &5���F
E� ” &00 LF���
���*� 15���F
K�+�*��
2*$�” &00 ��* $�$�* %+���7�-*+�”���*�
�F�”” E ��*”���8�$�*
�F�”” ;
=
)��
#����,
#F���
�*
“���8����M
8�*”$ ���
8��N�”�$NF�
����
?�@��
��OO��P?�@�� Q��R S�T U�� ��� V�@����
Q��R WXX�Y��XP V� �T��R
V�R��%. &00 &00 2*$�” &00 G&Z &:0&[�R�� \]] \]] \]] \̂_
��� �
U�̀?�@�� a��@�R�
a�PU�T�X��T U�T�X��� WRb��%. &GZ <&Z �9% �9% BO���R�� cdedfghi jkflgh mneneop qgrsp qhtuvktwdp xnufgfyp cgld zkklp {d|ng zkklp }ghkep }~vd|thd| �fgew�kf�g�nke2*$� 3��8$#$8� �$�8(�*����, ��$+��� E��(, -* $+$ ��F %$� ��*���F, >1=����
K�”��*”�
3�”�������
��OO��PK�8�� �
E���� ����$�
>J,
..� ������$*7
5$�� /
��*�(H”I5���
E���� 2* $”8F�”� E����
5��� !*
2″��K�8�� �
3�FF�� �����”�*
���F�(
3�”���”,
-�� 3�FF��
5��� ��$+���
-*+�”���5���
3�FF�� �9% ��$����
���$#$8��$�* E����-*����”�
5��*”#���� L��
3$��F�9L���(�F 5��� 3�F������*�
2″� 3������$+�
.$+$*7 ;��� ‘9J&9>0&G�����”�
2″� 3������$+�
.$+$*7 3�F�
��$8� �<,>00,000.$”�$*7
E����� 2* $”8F�”� L$*�*8$*7 ������
K���
L$*�*8$*73�FF$*7
E����� 2* $”8F�”� ��”(
!��$+�F�*� �<,>00,000;�8
� >0&G0&>J/G ���$��F
% ��”���*� �0% ��”��
��$8� �<,>00,000[��� �XR���
��OO��P
Y��
��@������
�SV�
����
�� R��P[��� �XR���
��R�[��� �XR���
[PY� S�P�� ������ a��X� �� b
����@����R
a��X�� �0’9>0&G 3�F� ����$�
>J,
..� �����”�*
���F�(
3�”���”,
-�� �<,>00,000 �’1:JJ
© 2020 CBRE, Inc.

���� ������
��� ��

����

���
������� ���
�����
��
������� ��������
��� !”�”
#$�%&’ ()�� ��*
���+� ” ���+�
,��+-���!
��
�� $ ./01+!$)2″
3)�4�)!
��� !”�” ������
5�-��� �6���&�
��� !”�” 788
9)&””
:��
#+ �
;79:#< =>?@A$�
:�����
B�$ ‘C5�->
D��$E>/F0 3)��$
C
D$G$�+$
H��� IJ=K@@@3)&L$��$’
:DD AC�M����N���D$G$�+$
(!-$ 3)&
O&)4�
���P� �6$’ ()�� ��*
���+� “3$)�&’
7�’��* /=CQ/C=@/. /=CQ/C=@/J�&+)�$ 1+!$) 1+!$)3)��$ IJK=@@K@@@ IJK=@@K@@@,��+-���! .=0 ./0D$”�’$��
R�!” QQ=/S Q=JS@788$���G$
9)&””
:��&4$ IQKQQ?KEES IQK/S?KJ=J7T-$�”$” I=KS/JKEE/ I=KSE@K.S/A$�
,-$)����*
:��&4$ IJ/JK@@F ISJSKJEEA,:CD$G$�+$
H��� IJK/J@ ISKJS.,7D ES>F.0 J/>FF079:# =>F? =>?@A$�
:�����
B�$ ‘C5�->
D��$ .>.J0 E>/F0U��

������� (%�”
�&4-�)�P $
)$-)$”$��”
�%$
“� $
&8
5&+)�!�)’
7″���$”
&8
3$&)��K

/@@VP$’
�””�”�$’
�G��*
)$”�’$��$
&���$’
��
3$&)��K
: ��&�”>
���&)’��*
�&
�%$
P+!$)K
�%$
���+�
-+)�%�”$
-)��$
W�”
IJ>=
4� �&�
&)
�–)&T�4��$ !
IJ=K@@@
-$)
+���>
1�”$’
&�
�%$
P+!$)2″
-)&
8&)4�K
�%�”
�”
)$8 $���G$
&8

.>.J0
��-��� �6���&�
)��$>
(%$
,�D
P�”$’
&�
(V/=
���&4$
��
– ��$
W�”
E>/F0>
(%$
�””$�
-+)�%�”$
�*)$$4$��
W�”
“�*�$’
�-)�
=K
=@/.
P!
��’
P$�W$$�
3$&)��
=QK
XX5
Y1+!$)Z
��’
3$�$)”$�
[$� �%
�!”�$4″K
:A5
Y�$ $)>Z
(%�”
“+–&)��G$
�G��*
�&44+���!
W�”
&-$� !
4�)\$�$’
P!

����&��
P)&\$)�*$
8�)4>
© 2020 CBRE, Inc.

���� ������
��� ��

����

���
������� ���
���������
���� ����� �!�
“�!!#$%��$
�$
���&�$�’ ��(( )**
����&
�!+�
,�”�!!#$%��$-
.,
/01)23$#��
,����(4�5��$��$�
6�7
‘%�$8� ,+����4�5�9:6�7
;< �:'���� =�>�� ?
@=
A�$
‘��� �:’ B���
�+#!� 1CCD4��((
�+#! #$%
‘���
E4�’FD1-CG*
(H B���
I�$�5��� 2*1/6���!
3$#�( )2 �+#! #$%( 26���!
�� ( )2 J!���
K�+$� 16���!
I�5�$+�
3$#�( )2 K�$ #�#�$ 4�� ;$5�(���$�
K!�(( �:’ K�$(��+8�#�$
K!�(( < L "�� H����- H!��� �$ (��+8�+��M 8�$(# ��� 8��N+(�#N!� ���� =�>��
��OO��P=�>�� Q��R S�T U�� ��� V�>����
Q��R WXX�Y��XP V� �T��R
V�R��’A )2 )2 3$#�( )2 G0Z �:'[�R�� \] \] \] _̂̀
@O���R�� 4�$���!a
J����!
<#$#$%- ��#5��� <#$#$%- A#N����- '��( : K��H�( ,�+ #�- b� #� I���- ,�!�$- ,8&� +!� 6��$(������#�$- K����$ A�+$ ��3$#� ,��8#H#8a .#�8&�$����- ��#5��� ���&- ;$ #5# +�! '#� K�$���!- ;$���$�� '88�((- 2cLd�+� I�(��$(� ,�(������� ��OO��PI�8�� � �+��� �:' b�����#$% 6#�� �:'6�+� �+��� b# e�(� d��!�&- ;$89 �+��� 6��� f$ 3(��I�8�� � ,�!!�� �:' ,�!!�� 6��� If;66�+� ,�!!�� g�$��(- ;$8 ��#���� g��#H#8��#�$ �+�8&�(� '%������$�- ������;$����(� 6��$(H���� �:' 6��� ,�!�K+���$� 3(� �:' <��� 11:1D:2*1C�����(� 3(� �:' ,�!� ��#8� hc-c**-***A#(�#$% ������ b#�� ,�%�! L �!+���#$� ' 5#(��( J#$�$8#$% b����� I��� J#$�$8#$%,�!!#$% ������ �:' K�(& fi+#5�!�$� hc-c**-***<�8 j �:' K��#��! ' k+(���$� h*' k+(�� ��#8� hc-c**-***[��� �XR��� ��OO��P Y�� l�>��m���
�SVn
o��p
�� R��P[��� �XR���
q�R�[��� �XR���
[PY� S�P�� ������ r��X� �� s
nt��>����R
r��X�u v11:2*1C ,�!� �:’ �:’ hc-c**-*** h1D09)C
© 2020 CBRE, Inc.

���� ������
��� ��

����

���
������� ���
�����
��
������� ��������
��� !”�”
#$�%&’ ()�� ��*
���+� ” ���+�
,��+-���!
��
�� $ ./01+!$)2″
3)�4�)!
��� !”�” ������
5�-��� �6���&�
��� !”�” 788
9)&””
:��
#+ �
;79:#< =>.?@$�
:�����
A�$ ‘B5�->
C��$=D>?.0 3)��$
B
C$E$�+$
F��� G.?HI=J3)&K$��$’
:CC @B�L����M���C$E$�+$
(!-$ 3)&
N&)4�
���O� �6$’ ()�� ��*
���+� “3$)�&’
7�’��* =PBQ=BPDPD IBQDBPD=R�&+)�$ �–)��”$) �–)��”$)3)��$ G?H?DDHDDD G?H?DDHDDD,��+-���! RJ0 R=0C$”�’$��
S�!” =.DQ= =/D.P788$���E$
9)&””
:��&4$ GPHID/H/RQ GPHQR?HRQ?7T-$�”$” G=HR=IH=DJ G=HRQQH.RQ@$�
,-$)����*
:��&4$ GIR=HI.. G?I=HD?=@,:BC$E$�+$
F��� G=QHQDP G.H.II,7C /Q>?.0 .D>/J079:# =>IR =>.?@$�
:�����
A�$ ‘B5�->
C��$ =J>/P0 =D>?.0U��

������� (%�”
�&4-�)�O $
)$-)$”$��”
�%$
“� $
&8
�V&
�””�”�$’
�E��*
�&44+����$”>
1)&&W’� $
X$ ��*�&�
�”
&���$’
��
X$ ��*�&�H
Y�H
&-$)��$”
V��%
PI
+���”H
��’
V�”
O+� �
��
=RR?
V��%

)$�&E���&�
��
PD=I>
1)&&W’� $
1$�%��!
�”
&���$’
��
1$�%��!H
,YH
&-$)��$”
V��%
PI
+���”H
��’
V�”
O+� �
��
=RRQ
V��%

)$�&E���&�
��
PD=I>
1&�%
O+� ‘��*”
�)$
“�4� �)
��
“�! $
��’
�)$
��
*&&’
�&�’���&�>
(%$
-)&-$)��$”
�)$
&���$’
��

“+O+)O��
�)$�”
V��%
*&&’
E�”�O� ��!
��’
���$””
V��%
8�E&)�O $
���$””
�&
%$� �%��)$
-)&E�’$)”>
�4$����$”
��’
“$)E��$”
&88$)$’
�)$
�&�”�”�$��
V��%
�%$
�&4-$����E$
4�)W$�”>
(%$
-)&-$)��$”
“& ‘
8&)

�&��
&8
G?H?DDHDDD
&�
@&E$4O$)
=QH
PD=RH
&)
G.?HI=J
-$)
)$E$�+$
+���>
,��+-���!
��
�%$
��4$
&8
“� $
V�”
./0
V��%
�%$
O+!$)
-+)�%�”��*
�%$
-)&-$)�!
O�”$’
&�
��
&-$)���&��
E� +$Z�”>
#�’V$”�
[$� �%
�””+4$’
4���*$4$��
&8
�%$
-)&-$)�!
-&”�
��\+�”���&�H
��’
)$ZO)��’$’
�%$
�&44+����$”
�”
[&4$”�$�’
&8
X$ ��*�&�
��’
1$�%��!>
3)����*
V�”
O�”$’
&�

�$�
&-$)����*
���&4$
&8
G?I=HD?=H
&)
G.H.II
-$)
)$E$�+$
+���H
8&)
��
&E$)�
��-��� �6���&�
)��$
=D>?.0
��’
79:#
&8
=>.?>
(%$
��� !”�”
�”
O�”$’
&�
�)�� ��*
=P
&-$)���&�”
��’
��� +’$
4�)W$�
$E$
4���*$4$��
8$$”
��’
)$- ��$4$��
)$”$)E$”
© 2020 CBRE, Inc.

���� ������
��� ��

����

���
������� ���
���������
���� ���� !�
“#����”����$$ %&'(
)�#�*
������!
)�����”#����+
�,
&((%-. /���
)����$0�1�� �� �
2�3
“4� !� “����*��0�1�562�3
78 (99&:(%9%����
;�<�� = >;
?
@�
A� �
“��� B59:C
�! D���
E#/F� %GGG0��$$
E#/F�/ 4
“���
H0E”I”+(%9
$J D���
K� �1���� �6″2���F
. /�$ &G E#/F�/ 4$ 92���F
E��$ GG LF���
��# � -2���F
K�1� #�
. /�$ GG �� �/�/� 0���7 1�$��� �
�F�$$ ” �� $��#!�/�
�F�$$ �
M
N�$� ��6!� !����
�3�5
O�FF$
P
O���6$���F
���J
P
JF���
$��#!�5+
�3!5
!� !����
$F�Q

4����
����
;�<�� ��RR��S;�<�� T��U V�W @�� ��� X�<���� T��U YZZ�[��ZS X� �W��U X�U��"A :B :B . /�$ :B ::\ �6"N� %C -C E��$ -C :B\ �6"]�U�� _̂ __ __ `̀a ��� � @�b;�<�� c��<�U� c�S@�W�Z��W @�W�Z��� YUd��"A %((\ �6" �6" �6"N� %((\ �6" �6" �6" >R���U�� 0� ���Fe
�6″. /�
)��!/J/!e
�6″����
��RR��SK�!�����
E#��� �f
“#����
����!�+
AA� N��g��/ 4
2/�� �6″2�#�
E#��� ���� !�
)� /��
A/1/ 4 E#���
2��� ��/1���
7 1�$���K�!�����
)�FF�� �h�N)+
AA� )�FF��
2��� �� $/�
L# �2�#�
)�FF�� �6” ��/����
f��/J/!��/� E��g��+
�EKi7 ����$�
2�� $J����� L��
)/��F�6L���*�F� 2��� )�F��#��� �
.$� )� /��$
h�#$/ 4 8��� &6B6-(-(�����$��
.$� )� /��$
h�#$/ 4 )�F�
��/!� j%(+B((+(((A/$�/ 4
E��g�� EF#���/ � L/ � !/ 4 N��g��
K���
L/ � !/ 4)�FF/ 4
E��g�� EF#���/ � ��$*
ik#/1�F� � j%(+B((+(((8�!
l i((G
GB9& ���/��F
“�m#$��� � j(“�m#$���
��/!� j%(+B((+(((]��� �ZU���
��RR��S
[��
n�<��o��� �VXp q��r �� U��S]��� �ZU��� s�U�]��� �ZU��� ]S[� V�S�� ������ c��Z� �� d pt��<����U c��Z�u v(&6-(-( )�F� �f "#���� ����!�+ AA� �h�N)+ AA� j%(+B((+((( j%BG5(' © 2020 CBRE, Inc. ���� ������ ��� �� � ���� � ��� ������� ��� ����� �� ������� �������� ��� !"�" #$�%&' ()�� ��* ���+� " ���+� ,��+-���! �� �� $ ../0+!$)1" 2)�3�)! ��� !"�" ������ 4�-��� �5���&� ��� !"�" 677 8)&"" 9�� #+ � :689#; <=.>?$�
9�����
@�$ ‘A4�-=
B��$C=DE/ 2)��$
A
B$F$�+$
G��� HIJEKJEI2)&L$��$’
9BB ?A�M����N���B$F$�+$
(!-$ ()�� ��*
���+� “2$)�&’
6�’��* OAJIO�&+)�$ 0)&P$)2)��$ HIJK.JJKJJJ,��+-���! ?A�B$”�’$��
Q�!” ?A�677$���F$
8)&””
9��&3$ H>KOR.KRCE6S-$�”$” H>KCR.KO>O?$�
,-$)����*
9��&3$ HCOOKOID?,9AB$F$�+$
G��� H.KJ.J,6B R<=>E/689# <=.>?$�
9�����
@�$ ‘A4�-=
B��$ C=DE/T��

������� 4�’$��$
�+)&)�
�”
��
�””�”�$’
�F��*
��’
3$3&)!
��)$
�&33+���!
“��+��$’
��

“+U+)U��
&����&�=
(%$
�3-)&F$3$��”
V$)$
�&�”�)+��$’
��
IOOO
��’
�)$
��
*&&’
�&�’���&�=
(%�”
�&33+���!
%�”
��
&F$)�
�$�”+”
&7
../
��
�%$
��3$
&7
“� $=
(%$
U+!$)
-+)�%�”$’
�%$
-)&-$)�!
U�”$’
&�
��
&-$)���&��
F� +$W�”
“�)��$*!=
(%$
-)&-$)�!
V�”
7&)3$) !
&-$)��$’
U!
0)&&P’� $K
V��%
4�’$��$
��P��*
&F$)
&-$)���&�”
-&”�
“� $
��’
)$U)��’��*
��
4�’$��$
�+)&)�=
(%$
�&33+���!
V�”
&-$)����*
��
U$ &V
“��U� �5$’
&��+-���!
$F$ ”
��
�%$
��3$
&7
“� $K
��’
�%$
U+!$)
“$$”
-&�$����
+-“�’$
&-$)���&�� !=
© 2020 CBRE, Inc.

���������
����
����
��������� ������������ �������������� !”� #$��%��&”�!��'()*�+)�,�(-$�./00��.. 122�3�.�� ���()-$!”�4�(5�6!)�/)��)(�7�#8�9:;<=>)(��0�6�!��.?�5��)”�)��#!@�/-�)*� A�@!��B�&)��?�5�CD#!@�E4 F=;=9:��� �G H �
I�JG�K�LG�K����K����’!)0�/��! D/ M�!��A&(+� 2=:= ���N�)�!O+��/��!�P N/Q D/ M�!��N�)�5!��0 D/#��!+�>)(�. ;R: A&(+0()-. 2#��!+�A�0. R< %+����B�&)� 1#��!+�N�5�)&��>)(�. ;R: B�)0(�(�) ?��0E)5�.�”�)��B+!.. A B�).��&*�(�)�B+!.. 4�S�3��0�T�!”�7�T+����!)0�.��&*�&��U�*�).(0���0�*�”O&.�(O+�
���� �G H ��
�����VG H � W���
X Y
� �
�� Z H �� �W���
[\\����\V Z
�Y ���Z����E’ 2R< D/ >)(�. 2R< :;] D//' 1< D/ >)(�. 1< :<] D/^B ;: D/ >)(�. ;: 9=] D/ B R< R< A�0. R< :F] D/_���� àb ac àb b̀d �� � � ���eG H � f��H�� �f�V� Y�\��Y � Y�\�� [�g �E' 2<<] D/ D/ D//' 2<<] D/ D/ D/^B 2<<] D/ D/ D/ B F<] D/ h<] D/�L� ���� ?�)��!+i�%��"!+�4()()-7���(5!���4()()-7�B+&O$�&.�7�̂!(+�N��"7�'(O�!��7�/��.�D�B�!T�.�6�&0(�7�?!"��N��"7�̂�0(!�N��"7�6!+�)7�6&)0���6$��7�A�!�0�N��"7�B�"�&����B�)���7�/j&!�(*�B�)���7�N�.(0�)��6���!-�7�3!+k()-�#�!(+.7�6*$�0&+�0�#�!).����!�(�)>)(��6��*(T(*i�l(�*$�)����7���(5!���A!�$7�3!+kSE)�6$�m��7�3!+kSE)�B+�.��.7�E)0(5(0&!+�/(��B�)���+7�;hS,�&��N�.��).��6�.��”Z �����
��H V6��5(*�.�E)*+&0�0 D/ n��(T(*!�(�) D/B�)*�..(�). 6��*(!+D���”��(�)i�2�M�!�i�o1<<7�;�M�!�i�oR<<7�1�M�!�i�o9<< B�)�!*� ;2> A1BCDEF ?4GHF*+ ?�-./0112 345 345 867�9�,=,@? <,=6>> �9�6=66; A1BCDEF ?4GHF5+ JCK/L1 345 345 ;?>�9�I,> <,=6>> <,=6>> <6=@?@ A1BCDEF ;4GHF3M N0LOHC. 345 345 345 345 > 3455+ > 345AM <8>> 345��� �
���Q �)
��� �� � � !� ����S�!�) 5+ +.O.ET <;;>�9�88>AM +.O.ET <;;>�9�88> U�S ��)
��� �� � � V
Q������� ) 345 G.W1TLC <6>>4XB.9YL2.345 N.C�Z.. <6>>4XB.9YL2.345 [112�J.0OL\.�MDH0]. <;345 K̂.TC�A.HE�MDH0]. <75+ Y.E.WD1B.�_�*BC.0B.C 345���������� �� YDLT�\12WH0H̀E.�LT�H�]11/�aKHELCF�LB/.W.B/.BC=�HTTLTC./=�HB/�2.210F�\H0.�\122KBLCF�bLCD�H�6>9̀./�TcLEE./�BK0TLB]�dH\LELCFe�YD.�L2W01O.2.BCT�b.0.�\1BTC0K\C./�LB�,787�HB/�H0.�LB�]11/�\1B/LCL1B=�HT�CD.�\H2WKT�bHT�0.B1OHC./�LB�?>,@e�YD.�W01W.0CF�LT�E1\HC./�LB�H�TK̀K0̀HB�H0.H�HB/�Hdd10/T�]11/�OLTL̀LELCF�HB/�H\\.TT�bLCD�dHO10H̀E.�H\\.TT�C1�D.HECD\H0.�W01OL/.0Te�52.BLCL.T�HB/�T.0OL\.T�1dd.0./�H0.�\1BTLTC.BC�C1�CD.�E1\HE�2H0c.Ce�YD.�W01W.0CF�LT�2HBH]./�̀F�ZLO.�JCH0�J.BL10�+LOLB]=�H�BHCL1BHE�1W.0HC10�1d�T.BL10T�D1KTLB]�\122KBLCL.Te�X\\KWHB\F�bHT�0.W10C./�HO.0H].�d10�CD.�W01W.0CFe�5TTLTC./�ELOLB]�HB/�2.210F�\H0.�0.BCT�H0.�̀HT./�1B�HB�H�̀HT.�WEKT�E.O.E91d9\H0.�TC0K\CK0.�bLCD�E.O.ET�1d�\H0.�0HB]LB]�d012�<;;>�C1�<88>e��AHBH].2.BC�LT�HET1�\DH0]LB]�H�\122KBLCF�d..�1d�<,=6>>�HB/�H�T.\1B/�0.TL/.BC�d..�1d�>�C1�<8>>e�YD.�\122KBLCF�LT�b.EE9.TCH̀ELTD./�HB/�DHT�H�]11/�0.WKCHCL1Be
© 2020 CBRE, Inc.

���������
����
����
��������� ���
���� ���� ���������������� � !���”#�$��%$� ��&�'()�*%##��** +,,�-�!�**��.��#/�0�%0��0’�1�23�4+56780’��#�/����*9�:��0 �0��2�;�%(�0<� !�;���=�>0��9�:�?@2�;�AB C757C4��� �D E �
F�GD�H����I�0#�%��� �@% J����!>’$� K77+����.�0��L$��%����M�.%N �@% J����.�0�:���# �@%2���$�80’�* 7C !>’$#’0(* K2���$�!�#* OC P$����=�>0� 52���$�.�:�0>��80’�* KO5 =�0#’�’�0 9��#A0:�*� �0��=$�** ! =�0*��><�'�0�=$�** B�Q�R��#�S�� �1�S$�����0#�*��><�>��T�<�0*'#���#�<� L>*�’L$�
���� �D E ��
�����UD E � V��W
X Y
Z �
�� [ E �� �V��W
\]]����]U [
�Y �W�[�W��%I 7C �@% 80’�* 7C +5̂ �@%�= �@% OC !�#* OC 4Ĉ �@%_�W��
à ba cb� def �� �

�Z�gD E � h��E�W �h�UZ Y�]��Y Z Y�]�� \Wi �%I K66̂ �@% �@% �@%�= ,,̂ �@% O,̂ �@%�G� ��W�
9�0���$j�P�� �$�B’0’0(1�I’L����1�%��*�@�=��S�*�/�>#’�1�9� ��.�� 1�k�#’��.�� 1�/�$�01�/>0#���/)��1�R�$”‘0(�2��’$*1�/<)�#>$�#�2��0*������’�080’��/��<'S'�$�%’��=�0���$1�5OQ&�>��.�*��0*��/�*�� [ �W���
��E U/��:’<�*�A0<$>#�# �@% l��’S’<��'�0 �@%=�0<�**'�0* �@% =�0��<� 5K6Q7m6QK6O6I�*��.�0��A0<���*� �@% />�:���B��� 67@55@5656k�0�(� �0� !���”#�$��/�0’���I’:’0(
© 2020 CBRE, Inc.

���������
����
����
��������� ���
���� ���� �����������������
��������
��� �� � � ����� !� ����
” #

�$ �%
&’ ��� �(��) � �����) ) �”�

� ��
*+ ,-./01 23* 23* 456�7�589 :;<966 :8<8=9�7�8<=>9 ?1@-ABC 43DEC*+ ;�FG/H11I 23* 23* 456�7�JJ6 :;<966 :4<866�7�5<;66 ?1@-ABC 43DEC2K LH0ME-G 23* 23* 23* 23* :89J DE0BC 43DEC2K K1INE@01@ 23* 23* 23* 23* :88J DE0BC 43DECO�����P �) � ���P��� Q���� !� � &��#��� � ���RP�� �" � &�� ������$������ PR #�� � �# �� �����&���������� P��# # P��#�� �# ���) ��� �� � � ����R�!�) ��� �(��) *+ :966 23*��� � ���P �) ��� �� � � !� ����R�!�) *+ +GMGBS :896�7�;<866 T�R ��) ��� �� � � U P������� ) *+ VGBGNA1@G 23**+ WGSN0-G�KEHG :;963DEC*+ LG-�XGG :9663Y@G7V0IG*+ Z.GS-�?GEB�KAEH[G :J���������� �� VA0S�\1INEHE]BG�0S�E�[11/�̂.EB0-C�ESS0S-G/�B0M0@[�\1II.@0-C�_0-A�E@�E--E\AG/�S̀0BBG/�@.HS0@[�aE\0B0-Cb�VAG�0INH1MGIG@-S�_GHG�\1@S-H.\-G/�0@�;==>�E@/�EHG�0@�[11/�\1@/0-01@b�VAG�NH1NGH-C�0S�B1\E-G/�0@�E�S.].H]E@�EHGE�E@/�Eaa1H/S�Gc\GBBG@-�M0S0]0B0-C�E@/�E\\GSS�_0-A�aEM1HE]BG�E\\GSS�-1�AGEB-A\EHG�NH1M0/GHSb�*IG@0-0GS�E@/�SGHM0\GS�1aaGHG/�EHG�\1@S0S-G@-�-1�-AG�B1\EB�IEH̀G-b�VAG�NH1NGH-C�0S�IE@E[G/�]C�FH11̀/EBG�,G@01H�+0M0@[<�E�@E-01@EB�1NGHE-1H�1a�SG@01HS�A1.S0@[�\1II.@0-0GSb�Y\\.NE@\C�_ES�HGN1H-G/�EMGHE[G�a1H�-AG�NH1NGH-Cb�*SS0S-G/�B0M0@[�HG@-S�EHG�]ESG/�1@�E�]ESG�NB.S�BGMGB71a7\EHG�S-H.\-.HG�_0-A�BGMGBS�1a�\EHG�HE@[0@[�aH1I�:896-1�:;<866b�?E@E[GIG@-�0S�EBS1�\AEH[0@[�E�\1II.@0-C�aGG�1a�:;<966�E@/�E�SG\1@/�HGS0/G@-�aGG�1a�:966b © 2020 CBRE, Inc. ��������� ���� ���� ��������� ������������ �������������� !"� #�!$%&'$��!�%�(�)&!"��*�'+,�-)..��-- /01�2�-��34$-���5�!.3!$�)$��$'�6�78�9:/1;<$'��.�3�!��-=�>��$”�$��7!?�)+�$@� A�?!�=�>�BC7!?�DE F/1990F��� �G H �
I�JG�K�LG�K����M!$.�)��! 9BF:F�!@ N�!��A4’&� /1FO=��–�A4’&.’$+�)��!�P=A)Q0196F;0�-R N�!��5�$�>!��. C)7��!&�<$'�- //F A4'&.'$+- F7��!&�A�.- //F #&����S�4$� T7��!&�5�>�$4��<$'�- //F S�$.'�'�$ U?@�&&�$�D$>�-�”�$��S&!– ) S�$-��4@�’�$�S&!– E�(�2��.�R�!”�6�R&����!$.�-��4@�4��V�@�$-‘.���.�@�”W4-�’W&�
���� �G H ��
�����XG H � Y���
Z [
� �
�� \ H �� �Y���
]^̂����̂X \
�[ ���\����DM FF9 FF9 <$'�- FF9 :/_ C))M OT OT <$'�- OT ;F_ C)`S T1 T1 <$'�- T1 F11_ C)a���� bbc bbc bbc dde �� � � ���fG H � g��H�� �g�X� [�̂��[ � [�̂�� ]�h �DM F11_ C) C) C))M F11_ C) C) C)`S F11_ C) C) C)�L� ���� ijkjlmno�pqlrmn�stktkuv�wltxmyj�stktkuv�zm{|v�zn}~�q}�jv��tkj�zjnnmlv�zqk�tjlujv��mtn��qqrv��t~lml�v��ly����zlm{y���y}�tqv��}�tyqlt}rv�imrj�5��"6�̀�.'!�5��"6�3!&�$6�34$.���3,��6�A!$%'$+��RR'@�6�A�!�.�5��"6�S�"�4����S�$���6�)�4!�'@�S�$���6�5�-'.�$��3���!+�6�2!&%'$+�7�!'&-6�3�@4��.�S�4���!�.6�=!�!+���!�%'$+6�S�>���.��!�%’$+6�3@,�.4&�.�7�!$-����!�’�$<$'��3��@'R'@���'�@,�$����6���'>!���A!�,6�2!&%(D$�3,����6�2!&%(D$�S&�-��-6�D$.’>’.4!&�)’��S�$���&6�D$���$���)@@�–6�/T(*�4��5�-��$-��3�-��”\ �����
��H X3��>’@�-�D$@&4.�. C) ���’R’@!�’�$ C)S�$@�–‘�$- C) S�$�!@� C)M!-��5�$��D$@��!-� C) 34�>���E!�� 1;C//C/1/1`!$!+�”�$� #�!$%&’$��!�%
© 2020 CBRE, Inc.

���������
����
����
��������� ������������ �����������������
��������
��� �� � � ����� !� ����
” #

�$ �%
&’ ��� �(��) � �����) ) �”�

� ��
*+ ,�-./0112 34 34 567�8�,9,5: ;<9=== ;69:>:�8�69>>: ?1@ABCD :�8�497>: ?1@ABCD 44 ;<9=== ;49>>: ?1@ABCD 6EFGD?L IAJ/K1 63 63 665�8�646 ;<9=== ;:9>>: ?1@ABCD 6EFGD?L L12MG@K1@ 4 4 >=7 ;<9=== ;39,>: ?1@ABCD 6EFGDN�����O �) �
���O��� P���� !� � &��#��� � ���QO�� �” � &��
������$������
OQ #�� �
�# ��
�����&���������� O��# #
O��#��
�# ���)
��� �� � � ����Q�!�) ��� �(��) *+ ;7:= REHH+ ;5:= REH?L ;,9:== REH��� �
���O �)
��� �� � � !� ����Q�!�) H+ +.S.CT ;4==�8�,9<==?L HCC8*@UCJTKS. REH V�Q ��) ��� �� � � W O������� ) �����&���������� O��# #���������� �� XBKT�U12MG0GYC.�KT�G@�.ZU.CC.@A�[JGCKAD�K@/.M.@/.@A�G@/�GTTKTA./�CKSK@\�U122J@KAD]�XB.�K2M01S.2.@AT�.̂0.�U1@TA0JUA./�K@�<=,3�G@/�G0.�K@�.ZU.CC.@A�U1@/KAK1@]�XB.�M01M.0AD�KT�C1UGA./�K@�G�TJYJ0YG@�G0.G�G@/�G__10/T�\11/�SKTKYKCKAD�G@/�GUU.TT�̂KAB�_GS10GYC.�GUU.TT�A1�B.GCABUG0.�M01SK/.0T]�H2.@KAK.T�G@/�T.0SKU.T�1__.0./�G0.�TJM.0K10�A1�AB.�C1UGC�2G0̀.A]�XB.�M01M.0AD�KT�2G@G\./�YD�a0G@̀CK@�bG0̀9�G�C1UGC�1M.0GA10�1_�T.@K10T�B1JTK@\�U122J@KAK.T]�HTTKTA./�CKSK@\�0.@AT�G0.�YGT./�1@�G�YGT.�MCJT�C.S.C81_8UG0.�TA0JUAJ0.�̂KAB�C.S.CT�1_�UG0.�0G@\K@\�_012�;4==�A1�;,9<==]�?.210D�UG0.�0.@AT�G0.�YGT./�1@�G@�GCC8K@UCJTKS.�TA0JUAJ0.]�?G@G\.2.@A�KT�GCT1�UBG0\K@\�G�U122J@KAD�_..�1_�;<9===�G@/�G�T.U1@/�0.TK/.@A�_..�1_�;7:=�_10�*+9�;5:=�_10�H+9�G@/�;,9:==�_10�?L] © 2020 CBRE, Inc. ��������� ���� ���� ��������� ������������ �������������� !"� #$!%���&�%'���(')'%*#$$��++ ,-./�0�"1!2��3�42�)!�$&!%�#%��%'�5�67�-8,.9:%'��$�&�!��+;�)��%"�%��6!<�#*�%=� 3�?6!<�@A ?#��� �B C � D�EB�F����F�GB�(!%$�#��! ?# H�!��34'2� ,9II;��++�34'2$'%*�#��!�J;3#K ?# H�!��L�%�)!��$ ?#6��!2�:%'�+ ,.9 34'2$'%*+ .6��!2�3�$+ ,.9 M2����0�4%� .6��!2�L�)�%4��:%'�+ ,.9 0�%$'�'�% ;��$@%)�+�"�%��02!++ # 0�%+��4=�'�%�02!++ A�N�O��$�P�!"�5�P2����!%$�+��4=�4��Q�=�%+'$���$�=�"14+�'12� ���� �B C �� �����RB C � S��� T U � � �� V C �� �S��� WXX����XR V �U ���V����@( IY9 IY9 :%'�+ IY9 I99Z ?##( [9 [9 :%'�+ [9 I99Z ?#\0 ,9 ,9 :%'�+ ,9 /YZ ?#]���� _̂̀ _̂̀ _̂̀ à b̀ �� � � ���cB C � d��C�� �d�R� U�X��U � U�X�� W�e �@( I99Z ?# ?# ?##( I99Z ?# ?# ?#\0 I99Z ?# ?# ?#�E� ���� fghgijkl�mniojk�pqhqhrs�tiqujvg�pqhqhrs�wjxys�wkz{|nz}gs�wnh~qgirgs��jqk��nnos��q{iji�s��iv}���wijxv}��vz�qns�fjog��nnos��g�qj��nnos��jknhs�0�"�4����0�%���5�O�22%�++�0�%���5�#�4!�'=�0�%���5�O!2�'%*�6�!'2+5�&�=4��$�0�4���!�$5�0�)���$��!��'%*5�&=��$42�$�6�!%+����!�'�%:%'��&��='P'=���'�=��%����5���')!���3!��5�O!2�N@%�&�����5�O!2�N@%�02�+��+5�@%$')'$4!2�#'��0�%���25�@%���%���#==�++5�,�N��4��L�+��%+��&�+��"V ����� ��C R&��)'=�+�@%=24$�$ ?# ���'P'=!�'�% ?#0�%=�++'�%+ ?# 0�%�!=� ?#(!+��L�%��@%=��!+� ?# &4�)���A!�� 9/?,,?,9,9\!%!*�"�%� &!*��!�&�%'���(')'%* © 2020 CBRE, Inc. ��������� ���� ���� ��������� ������������ ����������������� �������� ��� �� � � ����� !� ���� " # �$ �% &' ��� �(��) � �����) ) �"� � � �� *+ ,�-./0112 34 34 563�7�898 :,;9<< :=;=,<�7�=;9<< >1?@ABC DEFGC*+ D�-./0112 =D =D 359�7�,;<39 :,;9<< :=;6<<�7�6;<43 >1?@ABC DEFGC*+ H1@@GI. =< =< ,;=DD�7�,;8=< :,;9<< :6;9,8�7�9;6<4 >1?@ABC DEFGCJ+ K@L/M1 ,< ,< =8, :D;<<< :=;49< >1?@ABC =EFGCJ+ ,�-./0112 6< 6< 686�7�969 :D;<<< :6;,9<�7�6;D9< >1?@ABC =EFGCJ+ D�-./0112 ,< ,< 8=4 :D;<<< :6;39< >1?@ABC =EFGC>H K@L/M1 D< D< D=9 :D;<<< :9;6<< >1?@ABC =EFGCN�����O �) �
���O��� P���� !� � &��#��� � ���QO�� �” � &��
������$������
OQ #�� �
�# ��
�����&���������� O��# #
O��#��
�# ���)
��� �� � � ����Q�!�) ��� �(��) *+ :3<< REJJ+ :989 REJ>H :989 REJ��� �
���O �)
��� �� � � !� ����Q�!�) J+ +.S.BT :6<<�7�D;<<<>H +.S.BT :D9<�7�9<< U�Q ��) ��� �� � � V O������� ) �����&���������� O��# #���������� �� WAMT�X12YG0GZB.�MT�G?�.[X.BB.?@�\LGBM@C�M?/.Y.?/.?@�G?/�GTTMT@./�BMSM?I�X122L?M@C]�WA.�M2Y01S.2.?@T�.̂0.�X1?T@0LX@./�M?�D<,,�G?/�G0.�M?�I11/�X1?/M@M1?]�WA.�Y01Y.0@C�MT�B1XG@./�M?�G�TLZL0ZG?�G0.G�G?/�G__10/T�.[X.BB.?@�SMTMZMBM@C�G?/�GXX.TT�̂M@A�_GS10GZB.�GXX.TT�@1�A.GB@AXG0.�Y01SM/.0T]�J2.?M@M.T�G?/�T.0SMX.T�1__.0./�G0.�TLY.0M10�@1�@A.�B1XGB�2G0̀.@]�WA.�Y01Y.0@C�MT�2G?GI./�ZC�KGI10G�K.?M10�+MSM?I;�G�?G@M1?GB�1Y.0G@10�1_�T.?M10T�A1LTM?I�X122L?M@M.T]�aXXLYG?XC�̂GT�0.Y10@./�GS.0GI.�_10�@A.�Y01Y.0@C]�>G?GI.2.?@�0.Y10@./�G�̂GM@�BMT@�̂M@A�T@01?I�/.2G?/]�JTTMT@./�BMSM?I�0.?@T�G0.�ZGT./�1?�G�ZGT.�YBLT�B.S.B71_7XG0.�T@0LX@L0.�̂M@A�B.S.BT�1_�XG0.�0G?IM?I�_012�:6<<�@1�:D;<<<]�>.210C�XG0.�0.?@T�G0.�ZGT./�1?�G?�GBB7M?XBLTMS.�B.TT�M?X1?@M?.?X.�_..T]�>G?GI.2.?@�MT�GBT1�XAG0IM?I�G�X122L?M@C�_..�1_�:,;9<<�@1�:D;<<<�G?/�G�T.X1?/�0.TM/.?@�_..�1_�:3<<�_10�J+�G?/�:9897:3<<�_10�*+]�WA.�_GXMBM@C�̂GT�0.?1SG@./�M?�D<,8�G?/�AGT�G�T@01?I�0.YL@G@M1?�M?�@A.�X122L?M@C] © 2020 CBRE, Inc. ��������� ���� ���� ��������� ������������ �������������� !"� #$��%&''!(��!��)*+!�*!���,��-.--��// 0121�3��!-4!��5�����5!*�.*��*&�6�#7�1892:;*&��-�5�!��/<�=��*"�*��#!>�.(�*+� 3�>!�<�=�?@#!>�)A B0C:DD��� �E F �
G�HE�I�JE�I����I����K!*-�.��! C2?1D2�!+ L�!��3M&’� C:88<��//�3M&'-&*(�.��!�N<3.OB9P6D11�/Q L�!��R�*�=!��- 92C8#��!'�;*&�/ 91: 3M&'-&*(/ C2#��!'�3�-/ 9:B S'����T�M*� 1#��!'�R�=�*M��;*&�/ 9:B T�*-&�&�* <��-)*=�/�"�*��T'!// 3 T�*/��M+�&�*�T'!// A�U�,��-�Q�!"�6�Q'����!*-�/��M+�M��V�+�*/&-���-�+�"WM/�&W'� ���� �E F �� �����XE F � Y��� Z [ � � �� \ F �� �Y��� ]^̂����̂X \ �[ ���\����)K CP: CP: ;*&�/ CP: :B_ @..K P2 P2 ;*&�/ P2 :8_ @.`T 92 90 3�-/ 90 :D_ @. T P2 D2 3�-/ D2 C22_ @.a���� bcd bde bde dfg �� � � ���hE F � i��F�� �i�X� [�̂��[ � [�̂�� ]�j �)K C22_ @. @. @..K C22_ @. @. @.`T C22_ @. @. @. T C22_ @. @. @.�J� ���� klmlnopq�rsntop�uvmvmwx�ynvzo{l�uvmvmwx�|o}~x�|p���s��lx��ovp��sstx��v�non�x��n{����|no}{���{��vsx����v{snv�tx�kotl��sstx��l�vo��sstx�yno�ln�R��"6�5!'�*6�5M*-���5$��6�A�+����/��QQ&+�6�3�!�-�R��"6�T�"�M����T�*���6�,�''*�//�T�*���6�.�M!�&+�T�*���6�R�/&-�*��5���!(�6�,!'�&*(�#�!&'/6�5�+M��-�T�M���!�-6�5+$�-M'�-�#�!*/����!�&�*6�T�""�*�K!M*-��6�#$��!���5��=&+�/;*&��5��+&Q&+���&�+$�*����6���&=!���3!�$6�,!'�U)*�5$�4��6�,!'�U)*�T'�/��/6�)*-&=&-M!'�.&��T�*���'6�)*���*���.++�//6�90U��M��R�/��*/��5�/��"6��&�+$�*6�K!M*-��6���&=!���A�+�6�;�(�!-�-�S'����T�=��&*(\ ����� ��F X5��=&+�/�)*+'M-�- @. %��&Q&+!�&�* @.T�*+�//&�*/ @. T�*�!+� @.K!/��R�*��)*+��!/� @. 5M�=���A!�� 2:@99@9292`!*!(�"�*� #$��%&''!(��!��)*+!�*!���,��- © 2020 CBRE, Inc. ��������� ���� ���� ��������� ������������ ����������������� �������� ��� �� � � ����� !� ���� " # �$ �% &' ��� �(��) � �����) ) �"� � � �� *+ ,-./01 23 23 245�6�789 :2;899 :2;<4=�6�7;24> ?1@-ABC >DEFC*+ 2�GH/I11J 298 298 >37�6�499 :2;899 :7;=52�6�>;448 ?1@-ABC >DEFC*+ 7�GH/I11J >3 >3 83=�6�2;928 :2;899 :>;=7>�6�5;4<= ?1@-ABC >DEFCK+ ,-./01 23 23 245�6�><9 :2;899 :>;798�6�5;>49 ?1@-ABC >DEFCK+ 2�GH/I11J 7< 7< >37�6�8>8 :2;899 :5;9==�6�8;254 ?1@-ABC >DEFCK+ 7�GH/I11J 5 5 394 :2;899 :8;722 ?1@-ABC >DEFC?L ,-./01 2= 2= 7>8�6�749 :2;899 :=;793 ?1@-ABC >DEFC?L L1JMF@01@ 5 4 799 :2;899 :5;577 ?1@-ABC >DEFCNL L1JMF@01@ 29 79 NDK NDK :759 EF0BC >DEFCNL OI0PF-H 59 59 NDK NDK :7<3 EF0BC >DEFCQ�����R �) �
���R��� S���� !� � &��#��� � ���TR�� �” � &��
������$������
RT #�� �
�# ��
�����&���������� R��# #
R��#��
�# ���)
��� �� � � ����T�!�) ��� �(��) �����&���������� R��# #��� �
���R �)
��� �� � � !� ����T�!�) K+ KBB6*@UB.V0PH NDK?L KBB6*@UB.V0PH NDK W�T ��)
��� �� � � X
R������� ) �����&���������� R��# #���������� ��
YA0V�U1JMFIFZBH�0V�F�IH@-FB�LL[L�-AF-�1\\HIV�0@/HMH@/H@-�B0P0@];�FVV0V-H/�B0P0@];�JHJ1IC�UFIH;�F@/�F�V̂0BBH/�@.IV0@]�\FU0B0-C�B1UF-H/�0@�F�V.Z.IZF@�FIHF_�KJH@0-0HV�F@/�VHIP0UHV�1\\HIH/�FIH�U1@V0V-H@-�̀0-A�-AH�B1UFB�JFÎH-_�YAH�MI1MHI-C�0V�JF@F]H/�ZC�YAH�a0BBF]H�1\�-AH�*@UFI@F-H�b1I/;�F�B1UFB�@1@6MI1\0-�1MHIF-1I_�?F@F]HJH@-�IHM1I-H/�F�̀F0-�B0V-�̀0-A�V-I1@]�/HJF@/�\1I�FBB�UFIH�BHPHBV_�KVV0V-H/�B0P0@]�F@/�JHJ1IC�UFIH�IH@-V�FIH�ZFVH/�1@�F@�FBB60@UB.V0PH�V-I.U-.IH_�YA0V�U1JJ.@0-C�AFV�F�V-I1@]�IHM.-F-01@�F@/�-CM0UFBBC�1MHIF-HV�@HFI�\.BBC�UFMFU0-C_
© 2020 CBRE, Inc.

Addenda

ADDENDUM B
Operating Data/Sale Contract/Repair Budget
© 2020 CBRE, Inc.

Date 8/17/2020 94.8% 94.8% 94.8% 94.8% 94.8% 94.8% 94.8% 94.8% 94.8% 94.8% 94.8% 94.8% Occ %
Property Ventura Hills 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Increase
Occupancy 92 93 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 0
Census 95 96 97 97 97 97 97 97 97 97 97 97 0
RPU $3,341 $3,337 $3,359 $3,359 $3,348 $3,348 $3,348 $3,348 $3,348 $3,348 $3,348 $3,348
INCOME Month 1 Month 2 Month 3 Month 4 Month 5 Month 6 Month 7 Month 8 Month 9 Month 10 Month 11 Month 12 Total
Apartment Rent 4% increase $281,554 $284,349 $289,544 $289,544 $289,544 $289,544 $289,544 $289,544 $289,544 $289,544 $289,544 $289,544 $3,461,349
Second Person $2,640 $2,640 $2,640 $2,640 $2,640 $2,640 $2,640 $2,640 $2,640 $2,640 $2,640 $2,640 $31,680
Level of Care $18,525 $18,720 $18,915 $18,915 $18,915 $18,915 $18,915 $18,915 $18,915 $18,915 $18,915 $18,915 $226,395
Guest Apt Rent $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Guest Meals $375 $375 $375 $375 $375 $375 $375 $375 $375 $375 $375 $375 $4,500
Pendant Fee $612 $619 $625 $625 $625 $625 $625 $625 $625 $625 $625 $625 $7,482
Laundry $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Activities $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Maintenance $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Housekeeping $325 $325 $325 $325 $325 $325 $325 $325 $325 $325 $325 $325 $3,900
Late Fees $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Community Fee $3,000 $3,000 $3,000 $3,000 $2,000 $2,000 $2,000 $2,000 $2,000 $2,000 $2,000 $2,000 $28,000
Pet Fee $325 $325 $325 $325 $325 $325 $325 $325 $325 $325 $325 $325 $3,900
Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Total Revenue $307,357 $310,353 $315,750 $315,750 $314,750 $314,750 $314,750 $314,750 $314,750 $314,750 $314,750 $314,750 $3,767,206
EXPENSES
Operations Expenses
Administrative Month 1 Month 2 Month 3 Month 4 Month 5 Month 6 Month 7 Month 8 Month 9 Month 10 Month 11 Month 12 Total
Admin ED $7,532 $7,532 $7,532 $7,532 $7,532 $7,532 $7,532 $7,532 $7,532 $7,532 $7,532 $7,532 $90,389
Assisted ED $4,597 $4,597 $4,597 $4,597 $4,597 $4,597 $4,597 $4,597 $4,597 $4,597 $4,597 $4,597 $55,167
Business Office Staf $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Reception $3,556 $3,556 $3,556 $3,556 $3,556 $3,556 $3,556 $3,556 $3,556 $3,556 $3,556 $3,556 $42,671
Payroll Taxes-Total $1,412 $1,412 $1,412 $1,412 $1,412 $1,412 $1,412 $1,412 $1,412 $1,412 $1,412 $1,412 $16,940
PTO-Admin $133 $133 $133 $133 $133 $133 $133 $133 $133 $133 $133 $133 $1,600
Holiday Pay-Admin $84 $84 $84 $84 $84 $84 $84 $84 $84 $84 $84 $84 $1,003
Overtime $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Payroll Administration $700 $700 $700 $700 $700 $700 $700 $700 $700 $700 $700 $700 $8,400
Travel $80 $80 $80 $80 $80 $80 $80 $80 $80 $80 $80 $80 $960
Training/ Conference $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Uniforms $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Incentive Bonus $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Pre Employment Cost $77 $77 $77 $77 $77 $77 $77 $77 $77 $77 $77 $77 $927
Office Supplies $180 $180 $180 $180 $180 $180 $180 $180 $180 $180 $180 $180 $2,163
Business Leases $990 $990 $990 $990 $990 $990 $990 $990 $990 $990 $990 $990 $11,878
Computer Expenses $371 $371 $371 $371 $371 $371 $371 $371 $371 $371 $371 $371 $4,456
Postage $53 $53 $53 $53 $53 $53 $53 $53 $53 $53 $53 $53 $637
Security $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Legal $159 $159 $159 $159 $159 $159 $159 $159 $159 $159 $159 $159 $1,910
Bad Debt Write Off 1% $3,074 $3,104 $3,157 $3,157 $3,147 $3,147 $3,147 $3,147 $3,147 $3,147 $3,147 $3,147 $37,672
Bank Fees $200 $200 $200 $200 $200 $200 $200 $200 $200 $200 $200 $200 $2,400
License and Fees $175 $175 $175 $175 $175 $175 $175 $175 $175 $175 $175 $175 $2,100
Dues and Subscriptions $500 $500 $500 $500 $500 $500 $500 $500 $500 $500 $500 $500 $6,000
Accounting and Audit $700 $700 $700 $700 $700 $700 $700 $700 $700 $700 $700 $700 $8,400
HR Fee $700 $700 $700 $700 $700 $700 $700 $700 $700 $700 $700 $700 $8,400
Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Total Administrative $25,274 $25,304 $25,357 $25,357 $25,347 $25,347 $25,347 $25,347 $25,347 $25,347 $25,347 $25,347 $304,072
Health Care
Wellness Directors $6,631 $6,631 $6,631 $6,631 $6,631 $6,631 $6,631 $6,631 $6,631 $6,631 $6,631 $6,631 $79,568
Care Staff $79,830 $79,830 $79,830 $79,830 $79,830 $79,830 $79,830 $79,830 $79,830 $79,830 $79,830 $79,830 $957,960
Pay Tax Clinical $7,781 $7,781 $7,781 $7,781 $7,781 $7,781 $7,781 $7,781 $7,781 $7,781 $7,781 $7,781 $93,377
PTO-Clinical $2,994 $2,994 $2,994 $2,994 $2,994 $2,994 $2,994 $2,994 $2,994 $2,994 $2,994 $2,994 $35,923
Holiday Pay-Clinical $1,876 $1,876 $1,876 $1,876 $1,876 $1,876 $1,876 $1,876 $1,876 $1,876 $1,876 $1,876 $22,512
Overtime $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Supplies $1,000 $1,000 $1,000 $1,000 $1,000 $1,000 $1,000 $1,000 $1,000 $1,000 $1,000 $1,000 $12,000
RN Consult $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Total Health Care $100,112 $100,112 $100,112 $100,112 $100,112 $100,112 $100,112 $100,112 $100,112 $100,112 $100,112 $100,112 $1,201,341
Marketing Expenses
Marketing Team $5,305 $5,305 $5,305 $5,305 $5,305 $5,305 $5,305 $5,305 $5,305 $5,305 $5,305 $5,305 $63,654
Payroll taxes-Marketing $477 $477 $477 $477 $477 $477 $477 $477 $477 $477 $477 $477 $5,729
Marketing PTO $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Holiday Pay $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Commissions $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Referral Fees $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Website Advertising $2,200 $2,200 $2,200 $2,200 $2,200 $2,200 $2,200 $2,200 $2,200 $2,200 $2,200 $2,200 $26,400
Advertising $350 $350 $350 $350 $350 $350 $350 $350 $350 $350 $350 $350 $4,200
Supplies $150 $150 $150 $150 $150 $150 $150 $150 $150 $150 $150 $150 $1,800
Special Events $525 $525 $525 $525 $525 $525 $525 $525 $525 $525 $525 $525 $6,300
Travel Expense $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Guest Meals $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Total Marketing $9,007 $9,007 $9,007 $9,007 $9,007 $9,007 $9,007 $9,007 $9,007 $9,007 $9,007 $9,007 $108,083
Environmental
Maintenance Director $4,869 $4,869 $4,869 $4,869 $4,869 $4,869 $4,869 $4,869 $4,869 $4,869 $4,869 $4,869 $58,422
Maintenance Staff $2,060 $2,060 $2,060 $2,060 $2,060 $2,060 $2,060 $2,060 $2,060 $2,060 $2,060 $2,060 $24,720
Payroll Taxes-Environmental $624 $624 $624 $624 $624 $624 $624 $624 $624 $624 $624 $624 $7,483
PTO-Environmental $260 $260 $260 $260 $260 $260 $260 $260 $260 $260 $260 $260 $3,118
Holiday Pay-Environmental $163 $163 $163 $163 $163 $163 $163 $163 $163 $163 $163 $163 $1,954
Overtime-Environmental $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Repairs Maintenance $1,545 $1,545 $1,545 $1,545 $1,545 $1,545 $1,545 $1,545 $1,545 $1,545 $1,545 $1,545 $18,540
Outside Contract $438 $438 $438 $438 $438 $438 $438 $438 $438 $438 $438 $438 $5,253
Fire Inspection/Repairs $2,781 $2,781 $2,781 $2,781 $2,781 $2,781 $2,781 $2,781 $2,781 $2,781 $2,781 $2,781 $33,372
Alarm System $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Elevator $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Land Scaping $2,558 $2,558 $2,558 $2,558 $2,558 $2,558 $2,558 $2,558 $2,558 $2,558 $2,558 $2,558 $30,694
Pest Control $478 $478 $478 $478 $478 $478 $478 $478 $478 $478 $478 $478 $5,742
Maintenance Supplies $820 $820 $820 $820 $820 $820 $820 $820 $820 $820 $820 $820 $9,841
Minor Equipment $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Total Environmental $16,595 $16,595 $16,595 $16,595 $16,595 $16,595 $16,595 $16,595 $16,595 $16,595 $16,595 $16,595 $199,138
Dining Services Expenses
Dining Services Director $5,928 $5,928 $5,928 $5,928 $5,928 $5,928 $5,928 $5,928 $5,928 $5,928 $5,928 $5,928 $71,142
Dining Services Chefs $8,128 $8,128 $8,128 $8,128 $8,128 $8,128 $8,128 $8,128 $8,128 $8,128 $8,128 $8,128 $97,531
Dishwasher $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Dining Services Staff $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Payroll Taxes-Dietary $1,265 $1,265 $1,265 $1,265 $1,265 $1,265 $1,265 $1,265 $1,265 $1,265 $1,265 $1,265 $15,181
PTO Dining Services $527 $527 $527 $527 $527 $527 $527 $527 $527 $527 $527 $527 $6,325
Holiday Pay Dining Services $330 $330 $330 $330 $330 $330 $330 $330 $330 $330 $330 $330 $3,964
Overtime Dining Services $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Raw Food Purchases $6.25 $18,050 $18,240 $18,430 $18,430 $18,430 $18,430 $18,430 $18,430 $18,430 $18,430 $18,430 $18,430 $220,590
Bar Supplies/Liquor $25 $25 $25 $25 $25 $25 $25 $25 $25 $25 $25 $25 $300
Supplies/Chemicals $451 $451 $451 $451 $451 $451 $451 $451 $451 $451 $451 $451 $5,411
Non-Food Supplies $412 $412 $412 $412 $412 $412 $412 $412 $412 $412 $412 $412 $4,944
Uniforms Dining Services $30 $30 $30 $30 $30 $30 $30 $30 $30 $30 $30 $30 $360
Dishes/Utensils $60 $60 $60 $60 $60 $60 $60 $60 $60 $60 $60 $60 $720
Equipment $375 $375 $375 $375 $375 $375 $375 $375 $375 $375 $375 $375 $4,500
Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Total Dietary Expenses $35,581 $35,771 $35,961 $35,961 $35,961 $35,961 $35,961 $35,961 $35,961 $35,961 $35,961 $35,961 $430,967
Laundry and Housekeeping
Housekeeping Supervisor $2,965 $2,965 $2,965 $2,965 $2,965 $2,965 $2,965 $2,965 $2,965 $2,965 $2,965 $2,965 $35,578
Housekeeping Staff $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Payroll Taxes Housekeep $267 $267 $267 $267 $267 $267 $267 $267 $267 $267 $267 $267 $3,202
PTO Housekeeping $111 $111 $111 $111 $111 $111 $111 $111 $111 $111 $111 $111 $1,334
Imagine Senior Living ImagineSeniorLivingLLC.com
© 2020 CBRE, Inc.

Holiday Pay Housekeeping $70 $70 $70 $70 $70 $70 $70 $70 $70 $70 $70 $70 $836
Overtime Housekeeping $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Uniforms Housekeeping $10 $10 $10 $10 $10 $10 $10 $10 $10 $10 $10 $10 $124
Supplies Housekeeping $450 $450 $450 $450 $450 $450 $450 $450 $450 $450 $450 $450 $5,400
Equipment-Laundry $30 $30 $30 $30 $30 $30 $30 $30 $30 $30 $30 $30 $360
Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Total Housekeeping $3,903 $3,903 $3,903 $3,903 $3,903 $3,903 $3,903 $3,903 $3,903 $3,903 $3,903 $3,903 $46,833
Activities
Activities Directors $5,699 $5,699 $5,699 $5,699 $5,699 $5,699 $5,699 $5,699 $5,699 $5,699 $5,699 $5,699 $68,394
Activity Team $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Memory Care Director $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
M/C Activity Team $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Payroll Tax Activities $513 $513 $513 $513 $513 $513 $513 $513 $513 $513 $513 $513 $6,155
PTO Activities $214 $214 $214 $214 $214 $214 $214 $214 $214 $214 $214 $214 $2,565
Holiday Pay Activities $134 $134 $134 $134 $134 $134 $134 $134 $134 $134 $134 $134 $1,607
Overtime Activities $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Community Events $500 $500 $500 $500 $500 $500 $500 $500 $500 $500 $500 $500 $6,000
Uniforms Activities $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Resident Relations $75 $75 $75 $75 $75 $75 $75 $75 $75 $75 $75 $75 $900
Contracted Services Activities $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Vehicle Lease $1,000 $1,000 $1,000 $1,000 $1,000 $1,000 $1,000 $1,000 $1,000 $1,000 $1,000 $1,000 $12,000
Vehicle Expense/Fuel $100 $100 $100 $100 $100 $100 $100 $100 $100 $100 $100 $100 $1,200
Supplies Activities $450 $450 $450 $450 $450 $450 $450 $450 $450 $450 $450 $450 $5,400
Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Total Activities Expense $8,685 $8,685 $8,685 $8,685 $8,685 $8,685 $8,685 $8,685 $8,685 $8,685 $8,685 $8,685 $104,221
Utilities
Electricity $6,079 $6,079 $6,079 $6,079 $6,079 $6,079 $6,079 $6,079 $6,079 $6,079 $6,079 $6,079 $72,947
Water, Trash, and Sewer $6,949 $6,949 $6,949 $6,949 $6,949 $6,949 $6,949 $6,949 $6,949 $6,949 $6,949 $6,949 $83,387
Gas $386 $386 $386 $386 $386 $386 $386 $386 $386 $386 $386 $386 $4,634
Telephone $2,748 $2,748 $2,748 $2,748 $2,748 $2,748 $2,748 $2,748 $2,748 $2,748 $2,748 $2,748 $32,973
Cable and Internet $972 $972 $972 $972 $972 $972 $972 $972 $972 $972 $972 $972 $11,661
Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Total Utilities $17,134 $17,134 $17,134 $17,134 $17,134 $17,134 $17,134 $17,134 $17,134 $17,134 $17,134 $17,134 $205,602
Taxes and Insurance
Property Tax Expense $7,567 $7,567 $7,567 $7,567 $7,567 $7,567 $7,567 $7,567 $7,567 $7,567 $7,567 $7,567 $90,804
Insurance-WC, Liability $2,747 $2,747 $2,747 $2,747 $2,747 $2,747 $2,747 $2,747 $2,747 $2,747 $2,747 $2,747 $32,960
Insurance-Property $2,349 $2,349 $2,349 $2,349 $2,349 $2,349 $2,349 $2,349 $2,349 $2,349 $2,349 $2,349 $28,186
Health Insurance $9,018 $9,018 $9,018 $9,018 $9,018 $9,018 $9,018 $9,018 $9,018 $9,018 $9,018 $9,018 $108,212
Tax Reserve, Personal, Property $398 $398 $398 $398 $398 $398 $398 $398 $398 $398 $398 $398 $4,774
Insurance – Auto $281 $281 $281 $281 $281 $281 $281 $281 $281 $281 $281 $281 $3,374
Total Taxes and Insurance $22,359 $22,359 $22,359 $22,359 $22,359 $22,359 $22,359 $22,359 $22,359 $22,359 $22,359 $22,359 $268,309
Total Expenses $238,649 $238,869 $239,113 $239,113 $239,103 $239,103 $239,103 $239,103 $239,103 $239,103 $239,103 $239,103 $2,868,567
Net Operating Income $68,708 $71,484 $76,637 $76,637 $75,647 $75,647 $75,647 $75,647 $75,647 $75,647 $75,647 $75,647 $898,639
NOI % 22.4% 23.0% 24.3% 24.3% 24.0% 24.0% 24.0% 24.0% 24.0% 24.0% 24.0% 24.0% 23.9%
NON-OPERATING EXPENSE
Operator
Mangment Fee 5% $15,368 $15,518 $15,787 $15,787 $15,737 $15,737 $15,737 $15,737 $15,737 $15,737 $15,737 $15,737 $188,360
Lease Payment $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Total Operator Expense $15,368 $15,518 $15,787 $15,787 $15,737 $15,737 $15,737 $15,737 $15,737 $15,737 $15,737 $15,737 $188,360
Partnership
Inter Company Loan $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
SBA Company Loan 2 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Loan Payment Operation $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Total Loan Payments $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
CAP-X Fund $25,000 $25,000 $25,000 $25,000 $25,000 $25,000 $25,000 $25,000 $25,000 $25,000 $25,000 $25,000 $300,000
Cash Reserves $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Total Partnership $25,000 $25,000 $25,000 $25,000 $25,000 $25,000 $25,000 $25,000 $25,000 $25,000 $25,000 $25,000 $300,000
Total Non-Operating Expense $40,368 $40,518 $40,787 $40,787 $40,737 $40,737 $40,737 $40,737 $40,737 $40,737 $40,737 $40,737 $488,360
Total Income-Total Expenses $28,340 $30,967 $35,849 $35,849 $34,909 $34,909 $34,909 $34,909 $34,909 $34,909 $34,909 $34,909 $410,279
Profit Loss $28,340 $30,967 $35,849 $35,849 $34,909 $34,909 $34,909 $34,909 $34,909 $34,909 $34,909 $34,909 $410,279
Cash Flow $28,340 $59,306 $95,156 $131,005 $165,914 $200,823 $235,733 $270,642 $305,551 $340,460 $375,369 $410,279
© 2020 CBRE, Inc.

Jun-20 May-20 Apr-20 Mar-20 Feb-20 Jan-20 YTD
Revenue
Operating Revenue
Other Income
Beauty Salon Rental $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 -$297.00 -$522.50 -$838.25 -$1,657.75
Physical Therapy Space Rental $208.00 $208.00 $208.00 $208.00 $416.00 $0.00 $1,248.00
Total Other Income $208.00 $208.00 $208.00 -$89.00 -$106.50 -$838.25 -$409.75
Total Operating Revenue $208.00 $208.00 $208.00 -$89.00 -$106.50 -$838.25 -$409.75
Room & Board AL
*Room & Board – AL
Room & Board AL $83,237.78 $147,625.24 $87,113.94 $153,224.37 $143,834.73 $140,129.78 $755,165.84
Total *Room & Board – AL $83,237.78 $147,625.24 $87,113.94 $153,224.37 $143,834.73 $140,129.78 $755,165.84
Additional Services – AL
Additional Resident AL $2,950.00 $2,950.00 $2,950.00 $2,949.96 $2,950.00 $1,000.00 $15,749.96
Additonal Meals / Tray Svc AL $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 -$246.80 $620.00 $0.00 $373.20
Beauty Salon AL $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $995.00 $1,405.50 $0.00 $2,400.50
Care Level 1 AL $775.30 $1,241.33 $571.34 -$234.42 $1,823.00 $2,636.93 $6,813.48
Care Level 2 AL $4,951.00 $8,581.93 $4,999.33 $8,374.20 $9,010.69 $8,087.00 $44,004.15
Care Level 3 AL $1,550.00 $987.10 $820.00 $600.00 -$2,280.00 $2,361.29 $4,038.39
Community Fees AL $1,750.00 $0.00 $3,500.00 $875.00 $8,750.00 $0.00 $14,875.00
Guest Meals AL $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $228.00 $1,440.00 $0.00 $1,668.00
Housekeeping AL $204.00 $204.00 $204.00 $204.00 $204.00 $204.00 $1,224.00
Medication Fee AL $3,668.67 $7,069.00 $3,842.00 $7,700.90 $7,719.00 $7,985.62 $37,985.19
Miscellaneous Resident Charge (AL) -$1,974.12 -$2,561.63 -$2,474.12 -$2,489.12 -$2,489.12 -$2,767.99 -$14,756.10
Pendant Fee AL $662.50 $403.00 $346.00 $346.00 $471.66 $359.10 $2,588.26
Pet Fee AL $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $425.00 $0.00 $0.00 $425.00
Total Additional Services – AL $14,537.35 $18,874.73 $14,758.55 $19,727.72 $29,624.73 $19,865.95 $117,389.03
Concessions – AL
Concessions – Additional Resident AL -$1,310.00 -$1,310.00 -$1,310.00 -$1,309.96 -$1,310.00 -$200.00 -$6,749.96
Concessions – Care Services AL -$3,145.00 -$3,395.00 -$3,145.00 -$3,395.00 -$1,951.90 -$3,795.00 -$18,826.90
Concessions – Community Fee AL -$1,750.00 $0.00 -$1,750.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 -$3,500.00
Concessions – Rent AL $8,900.00 $6,038.49 $7,170.75 -$6,226.21 $5,708.39 $7,235.87 $28,827.29
Total Concessions – AL $2,695.00 $1,333.49 $965.75 -$10,931.17 $2,446.49 $3,240.87 -$249.57
Total Room & Board AL $100,470.13 $167,833.46 $102,838.24 $162,020.92 $175,905.95 $163,236.60 $872,305.30
Room & Board MC
*Room & Board – MC
Room & Board MC $67,714.99 $6,150.00 $68,459.25 $3,543.35 $4,939.59 $13,432.37 $164,239.55
Total *Room & Board – MC $67,714.99 $6,150.00 $68,459.25 $3,543.35 $4,939.59 $13,432.37 $164,239.55
Additional Services – MC
Additional Care Services MC $0.00 $0.00 -$1,434.48 $1,108.62 $380.17 $525.00 $579.31
Beauty Salon MC $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $88.00 $34.00 $0.00 $122.00
Care Level 1 MC $1,647.00 $1,097.00 $1,747.00 $1,097.00 $1,097.00 $336.06 $7,021.06
Care Level 2 MC $3,689.00 $0.00 $3,689.00 -$551.17 $643.03 $888.00 $8,357.86
Community Fees MC $2,000.00 $0.00 $0.00 $2,000.00 $0.00 $7,500.00 $11,500.00
Guest Meals MC $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $12.00 $132.00 $0.00 $144.00
Medication Fee MC $3,400.33 $0.00 $3,400.33 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $6,800.66
Miscellaneous Resident charge MC -$15.00 $0.00 -$15.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 -$30.00
Pet Fee MC $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $1,274.74 $1,274.74
Total Additional Services – MC $10,721.33 $1,097.00 $7,386.85 $3,754.45 $2,286.20 $10,523.80 $35,769.63
Concessions – MC
Concessions – Care Level MC -$250.00 $0.00 -$250.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 -$500.00
Concessions – Community Fees MC $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $875.00 $875.00
Concessions – Rent MC $610.98 $1,995.00 $431.00 $1,932.00 $2,119.92 $2,196.00 $9,284.90
Total Concessions – MC $360.98 $1,995.00 $181.00 $1,932.00 $2,119.92 $3,071.00 $9,659.90
Total Room & Board MC $78,797.30 $9,242.00 $76,027.10 $9,229.80 $9,345.71 $27,027.17 $209,669.08
Total Revenue $179,475.43 $177,283.46 $179,073.34 $171,161.72 $185,145.16 $189,425.52 $1,081,564.63
Gross Profit $179,475.43 $177,283.46 $179,073.34 $171,161.72 $185,145.16 $189,425.52 $1,081,564.63
Operating Expenses
Administration -A- Payroll
Business Office Director $3,653.50 $4,202.30 $4,675.60 $4,834.33 $4,131.39 $2,310.02 $23,807.14
Employee Benefits- Admin $725.30 $861.04 $1,098.55 $1,452.32 $972.14 $277.11 $5,386.46
Income Statement
Ventura Hills
For the month ended 30 June 2020
© 2020 CBRE, Inc.

Employee Uniforms – Admin $0.00 $79.83 $70.73 $79.64 $69.64 $98.52 $398.36
Employment Screenings – Admin $147.10 $82.22 $1,015.30 $795.00 $912.00 $395.90 $3,347.52
Executive Director $7,101.09 $7,101.69 $7,101.09 $7,101.69 $7,908.18 $12,175.01 $48,488.75
Executive Director Taxes / Benefits $1,535.42 $1,534.88 $1,535.43 $1,541.39 $1,704.44 $1,955.84 $9,807.40
Holiday Pay – Admin -$33.45 $501.69 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $247.88 $716.12
Overtime – Admin $141.34 $266.87 $904.60 $367.49 $269.06 $131.78 $2,081.14
Payroll Service Fee $1,808.11 $2,291.87 $2,352.87 $2,390.55 $2,999.40 $2,431.66 $14,274.46
Payroll Taxes – Admin $614.81 $704.96 $1,105.46 $1,044.25 $776.80 $611.02 $4,857.30
PTO/Sick Leave Wages – Admin $715.65 $612.64 $1,024.55 $74.28 $1,569.20 $819.57 $4,815.89
Receptionist/Concierge $1,786.38 $2,068.96 $4,379.24 $7,493.43 $2,388.74 $1,791.31 $19,908.06
Workers Comp – Admin $2,452.83 $2,452.83 $2,452.83 $2,452.83 $2,452.83 $2,452.83 $14,716.98
Total Administration -A- Payroll $20,648.08 $22,761.78 $27,716.25 $29,627.20 $26,153.82 $25,698.45 $152,605.58
Administration -B- Operating Expenses
Bank Fees $253.92 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $253.92
Cell Phones Directors/Managers $65.00 $80.00 $135.00 $105.00 $105.00 $0.00 $490.00
Computer Software Maintenace $867.70 $1,003.75 $758.34 $939.10 $746.45 $1,159.96 $5,475.30
Copier Lease $1,056.15 $540.05 $722.66 $569.08 $1,006.81 $1,704.07 $5,598.82
Dues & Subscriptions – Admin $957.25 $958.59 $1,086.95 $2,535.55 $5,663.10 $0.00 $11,201.44
Employee Appreciation – Admin $67.93 $293.34 $116.60 $15.81 $0.00 $0.00 $493.68
Equipment & Furniture Lease – Admin $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $472.90 $0.00 $472.90
Food-Admin $0.00 $0.00 $43.05 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $43.05
Interest / Finance Charges $96.80 $1,105.71 $0.00 $0.00 $110.79 $76.77 $1,390.07
Management Company Travel $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $1,307.58 $0.00 $454.32 $1,761.90
Meals & Entertainment – Admin $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $165.54 $442.38 $607.92
Office Equipment Repair $0.00 $19.47 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $19.47
Office Supplies – Admin $221.98 $357.34 $237.97 $87.74 $150.92 $38.11 $1,094.06
Postage & Delivery $346.09 $23.50 $1.26 $166.49 $55.55 $105.14 $698.03
Training and Meetings – Admin $881.57 $543.55 $2,955.16 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $4,380.28
Total Administration -B- Operating Expe $4,814.39 $4,925.30 $6,056.99 $5,726.35 $8,477.06 $3,980.75 $33,980.84
Assisted Living -A- Payroll
Bonuses – AL $100.00 $271.43 $1,028.57 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $1,400.00
Employee Benefits Other – AL $2,054.25 $1,386.74 $128.69 $848.07 $3,479.87 $429.11 $8,326.73
Employee Uniforms – AL $64.27 $348.44 $0.00 $175.94 $0.00 $0.00 $588.65
Employment Screenings – AL $14.83 $144.13 $31.45 $0.00 $38.55 $21.58 $250.54
Health Services Director – AL $4,986.28 $5,975.28 -$1,236.26 $4,409.34 $7,211.55 $5,051.50 $26,397.69
Holiday Pay – AL -$93.62 $1,404.23 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $3,315.15 $4,625.76
Overtime – AL $2,950.39 $2,948.13 $6,609.57 $6,938.57 $6,823.11 $4,462.74 $30,732.51
Payroll Taxes – AL $2,867.94 $3,639.89 $4,617.45 $4,218.46 $5,430.70 $4,934.65 $25,709.09
PTO/Sick Leave Wages – AL $903.87 $779.07 $417.49 $3,417.32 $966.84 $1,166.79 $7,651.38
Salaries & Wages AL CNA/Res Assistant $15,688.84 $16,332.94 $14,465.59 $14,701.92 $17,682.56 $14,654.02 $93,525.87
Salaries & Wages AL LPN $3,702.86 $4,525.61 $6,254.12 -$960.00 $4,800.00 $2,936.37 $21,258.96
Salaries & Wages AL Med Tech $3,947.35 $5,976.50 $17,556.77 $17,812.65 $18,074.06 $13,462.75 $76,830.08
Total Assisted Living -A- Payroll $37,187.26 $43,732.39 $49,873.44 $51,562.27 $64,507.24 $50,434.66 $297,297.26
Assisted Living -B- Operating Expenses
Contract Labor – AL $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $9,649.59 $0.00 $9,649.59
Hazardous Waste Disposal – AL $110.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $110.00 $220.00
Medical Supplies $183.94 $0.00 $92.38 $1,601.76 $260.77 $265.72 $2,404.57
Mileage – AL $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $54.42 $0.00 $54.42
Supplies – Medical/ Charged to Residents A $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $120.64 $120.64
Training and Meetings – AL $0.00 $380.08 $2,280.50 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $2,660.58
Total Assisted Living -B- Operating Expe $293.94 $380.08 $2,372.88 $1,601.76 $9,964.78 $496.36 $15,109.80
Dining -A- Payroll
Cooks $7,448.20 $7,925.37 $8,590.23 $9,796.53 $11,103.34 $8,012.61 $52,876.28
Director of Dining Service $4,716.37 $5,625.36 $5,366.02 $5,294.47 $5,509.12 $4,253.20 $30,764.54
Employee Benefits Other – Dining $1,059.20 $1,706.85 $2,017.06 $2,097.93 $2,416.28 $966.37 $10,263.69
Employment Screenings – Dining $2.91 $18.90 $10.25 $0.00 $0.00 $2.20 $34.26
Holiday Pay – Dining -$27.36 $410.46 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $1,308.46 $1,691.56
Overtime – Dining $21.92 $439.42 $292.34 $33.73 $25.92 $0.00 $813.33
Payroll Taxes – Dining $953.60 $1,199.18 $1,177.43 $1,447.24 $1,715.17 $1,528.24 $8,020.86
PTO/Sick Leave Wages – Dining $306.30 $1,107.32 $315.11 $250.41 $858.85 $408.26 $3,246.25
Total Dining -A- Payroll $14,481.14 $18,432.86 $17,768.44 $18,920.31 $21,628.68 $16,479.34 $107,710.77
Dining -B- Operating Expenses
Contract Services – Menu $100.00 $100.00 $100.00 $100.00 $100.00 $100.00 $600.00
Dishwasher Chemicals $238.71 $50.30 $90.42 $230.16 $132.94 $276.50 $1,019.03
Dishwasher Lease $889.79 $1,779.58 $0.00 $667.27 $889.79 $8,140.92 $12,367.35
Grease Trap Cleaning $0.00 $1,093.25 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $843.25 $1,936.50
Kitchen Supplies $489.84 $71.44 $300.65 $237.55 $71.44 $394.25 $1,565.17
Paper & Forms-Dining $104.66 $0.00 $90.58 $57.84 $0.00 $35.76 $288.84
Paper & Plastic Supplies – Dining $68.16 $108.65 $184.46 $252.52 $120.64 $205.97 $940.40
Raw Food $7,710.20 $8,277.01 $8,253.81 $9,759.53 $5,589.72 $9,042.96 $48,633.23
Training and Meetings – Dining $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $80.70 $0.00 $0.00 $80.70
Vendor Rebates – Dining $0.00 -$736.34 $0.00 -$382.18 $0.00 $0.00 -$1,118.52
Total Dining -B- Operating Expenses $9,601.36 $10,743.89 $9,019.92 $11,003.39 $6,904.53 $19,039.61 $66,312.70
Housekeeping -A- Payroll
Employee Benefits Other – Housekeeping $2.43 $2.79 $2.63 $3.10 $1.45 -$2.05 $10.35
Employee Uniforms – Housekeeping $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $153.39 $207.74 $361.13
Employment Screenings – Housekeeping $0.75 $4.06 $2.35 $0.00 $0.00 $0.38 $7.54
© 2020 CBRE, Inc.

Holiday Pay – Housekeeping -$16.29 $244.30 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $200.48 $428.49
Housekeepers $2,571.88 $3,040.12 $3,466.53 $3,026.78 $3,731.92 $1,821.84 $17,659.07
Overtime – Housekeeping $0.00 $0.00 $61.53 $0.00 $21.58 $0.00 $83.11
Payroll Taxes – Housekeeping $254.92 $331.18 $351.86 $367.38 $400.88 $199.81 $1,906.03
PTO/Sick Leave Wages – Housekeeping $503.32 $196.51 -$172.13 $413.11 $0.00 $0.00 $940.81
Total Housekeeping -A- Payroll $3,317.01 $3,818.96 $3,712.77 $3,810.37 $4,309.22 $2,428.20 $21,396.53
Housekeeping -B- Operating Expenses
Chemicals – Housekeeping $223.56 $862.82 $747.67 $441.17 $176.14 $441.29 $2,892.65
Cleaning Supplies – Housekeeping $314.04 $0.00 $0.00 $370.97 $135.59 $399.11 $1,219.71
Total Housekeeping -B- Operating Expen $537.60 $862.82 $747.67 $812.14 $311.73 $840.40 $4,112.36
Maintenance & Repair -A- Payroll
Director of Engineering $3,248.91 $3,729.19 $4,068.21 $3,587.93 $4,944.00 $3,124.92 $22,703.16
Employee Benefits Other – Maintenance $19.54 $27.72 $26.83 $27.72 $31.30 $9.97 $143.08
Employment Screenings – Maintenance $1.35 $7.91 $4.73 $0.00 $0.00 $0.94 $14.93
Engineering Tech $1,597.83 $1,992.38 $2,456.50 $2,487.76 $2,652.83 $735.69 $11,922.99
Holiday Pay – Maintenance -$6.51 $97.64 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $358.14 $449.27
Payroll Taxes – Maintenance $507.51 $494.89 $514.75 $582.56 $773.75 $633.82 $3,507.28
PTO/Sick Leave Wages – Maintenance $1,793.83 $649.78 $169.51 $847.29 $168.75 $277.02 $3,906.18
Total Maintenance & Repair -A- Payroll $7,162.46 $6,999.51 $7,240.53 $7,533.26 $8,570.63 $5,140.50 $42,646.89
Maintenance & Repair -B- Operating Expenses
Building Repairs $2,934.65 $2,927.16 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $5,861.81
Chemicals – Maintenance $0.00 $413.47 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $413.47
Consultants – Maintenance $0.00 $243.26 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $243.26
Contract Labor – Maintenance $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $389.70 $0.00 $389.70
Dues & Subscriptions – Maintenance $214.00 $107.00 $0.00 $214.00 $107.00 $0.00 $642.00
Equipment Lease Maintenance $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $2,318.73 $2,318.73
Exterminating Contract $187.44 $325.13 $368.55 $187.44 $187.44 $1,455.21 $2,711.21
Fire Alarm & Fire Sprinkler R&M/Contractsv $1,906.80 $1,505.87 $1,505.87 $4,200.21 $4,484.01 $3,006.87 $16,609.63
General Maintenance Supplies -$60.97 $392.05 $713.74 $863.34 $1,178.34 $717.44 $3,803.94
Generator Service $0.00 $301.75 $0.00 $0.00 $2,320.39 $1,269.80 $3,891.94
Grounds Contract $2,481.12 $2,509.79 $2,318.73 $2,318.73 $2,427.31 $176.73 $12,232.41
Hurricane Supplies $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $125.00 $0.00 $125.00
Licenses & Permits Maintenance $0.00 $0.00 $1,037.34 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $1,037.34
Light Bulbs/Electrical Supplies $0.00 $169.67 $170.19 $196.78 $221.70 $214.43 $972.77
Mileage – Maintenance $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $12.18 $0.00 $12.18
Plumbing R&M $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $2,200.00 $2,200.00
Plumbing Supplies $155.86 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $155.86
Roof Repair $0.00 $0.00 $133.19 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $133.19
Water Softner System – Supplies $501.39 $419.34 $493.93 $449.16 $456.62 $479.14 $2,799.58
Total Maintenance & Repair -B- Operatin $8,320.29 $9,314.49 $6,741.54 $8,429.66 $11,909.69 $11,838.35 $56,554.02
Marketing -A- Payroll
Employee Benefits Other – Marketing $0.00 $0.00 $15.29 $93.43 $29.73 -$267.13 -$128.68
Employment Screenings – Marketing $8.32 $1.76 $3.73 $0.00 $0.00 $0.82 $14.63
Holiday Pay – Marketing $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $163.59 $163.59
Marketing Director $4,450.54 $3,151.45 $2,845.76 $6,080.78 $5,178.89 $3,886.56 $25,593.98
Overtime – Marketing $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $91.01 $0.00 $0.00 $91.01
Payroll Taxes – Marketing $473.02 $340.08 $278.14 $566.93 $524.00 $411.87 $2,594.04
PTO/Sick Leave Wages – Marketing $0.00 $131.67 $790.01 $829.51 $829.52 $293.10 $2,873.81
Sales Counselor – Marketing $116.83 $0.00 $0.00 $267.50 $0.00 $0.00 $384.33
Total Marketing -A- Payroll $5,048.71 $3,624.96 $3,932.93 $7,929.16 $6,562.14 $4,488.81 $31,586.71
Marketing -B- Operating Expenses
Agency Fees $181.92 $373.60 $414.95 $346.03 $224.59 $428.08 $1,969.17
Collateral $92.50 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $768.14 $860.64
Community Outreach $159.79 $0.00 $0.00 $87.57 $2.17 $0.00 $249.53
Direct Mail $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $140.66 $140.66
Dues & Subscriptions – Marketing $0.00 $0.00 $477.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $477.00
Events $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $133.93 $133.93
Leads/CRM $3,653.49 $3,494.07 $212.77 $5,717.65 $5,432.52 $5,169.95 $23,680.45
Paid Placement Search Marketing $640.85 $987.29 $987.29 $987.29 $987.29 $1,249.86 $5,839.87
Referral Fees $3,195.00 $0.00 $2,327.50 $5,465.00 $14,485.00 $0.00 $25,472.50
Social Media Marketing & Oversight $640.85 $987.28 $1,087.29 $987.28 $987.29 $987.29 $5,677.28
Traditional Media $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $510.13 $510.13 $1,020.26
Travel – Marketing $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $1,760.63 $1,760.63
Travel Meals – Marketing $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $251.05 $0.00 $0.00 $251.05
Website Hosting $234.44 $234.44 $234.44 $234.44 $234.44 $234.44 $1,406.64
Total Marketing -B- Operating Expenses $8,798.84 $6,076.68 $5,741.24 $14,076.31 $22,863.43 $11,383.11 $68,939.61
Memory Care -A- Payroll
Bonuses – MC $0.00 $328.57 $221.43 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $550.00
Employee Benefits Other – MC $1,228.58 $1,470.32 $2,763.85 $1,637.49 $27.73 -$203.96 $6,924.01
Employment Screenings – MC $19.46 $30.12 $16.95 $0.00 $0.00 $1.84 $68.37
Holiday Pay – MC -$88.65 $1,329.68 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $1,095.50 $2,336.53
Memory Care Manager $0.00 $412.09 $8,241.77 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $8,653.86
Overtime – MC $3,335.77 $6,620.57 $2,370.64 $2,129.06 $1,935.49 $909.30 $17,300.83
Payroll Taxes – MC $1,694.22 $2,518.13 $1,810.75 $1,665.42 $1,634.92 $1,123.07 $10,446.51
PTO/Sick Leave Wages – MC $208.68 $493.75 -$347.04 $1,903.03 $225.00 $240.16 $2,723.58
Salaries & Wages MC CNA/Res Assistant $5,044.06 $6,651.29 $4,360.44 $4,064.88 $3,302.45 $3,610.18 $27,033.30
Salaries & Wages MC Med Tech $7,928.19 $8,573.60 $7,601.48 $4,081.64 $9,845.66 $4,106.74 $42,137.31
© 2020 CBRE, Inc.

Salaries & Wages MS LPN $3,581.18 $3,977.14 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $7,558.32
Total Memory Care -A- Payroll $22,951.49 $32,405.26 $27,040.27 $15,481.52 $16,971.25 $10,882.83 $125,732.62
Memory Care -B- Operating Expenses
Training and Meetings – MC $1,270.29 $190.93 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $1,461.22
Wellness Supplies MC $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $125.00 $125.00
Total Memory Care -B- Operating Expens $1,270.29 $190.93 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $125.00 $1,586.22
Resident Services -A- Payroll
Activities Aid – Lifestyles $4,727.77 $5,122.04 $2,571.43 $2,671.39 $2,957.25 $1,382.77 $19,432.65
Director / Manager – Lifestyles $0.00 $182.86 $1,097.14 $0.00 $0.00 -$156.32 $1,123.68
Employee Benefits Other – Lifestlyes $1.84 $1.40 $1.80 $0.00 $0.00 $516.51 $521.55
Employment Screenings – Lifestyles $1.17 $7.25 $4.13 $0.00 $23.00 $0.42 $35.97
Holiday Pay – Lifestyles -$14.23 $213.43 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 -$697.33 -$498.13
Overtime – Lifestyles $249.89 $299.93 $340.31 $205.50 $65.25 $22.05 $1,182.93
Payroll Taxes – Lifestyles $379.70 $451.03 $385.15 $307.24 $322.80 -$87.62 $1,758.30
PTO/Sick Leave Wages – Lifestlyes $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $1,231.07 $1,231.07
Salaries & Wages – Lifestyles $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $858.24 $858.24
Total Resident Services -A- Payroll $5,346.14 $6,277.94 $4,399.96 $3,184.13 $3,368.30 $3,069.79 $25,646.26
Resident Services -B- Operating Expenses
Contract Entertainment $157.42 $0.00 $296.98 $80.00 $80.00 $233.40 $847.80
Decorations $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $112.34 $0.00 $112.34
Office Supplies $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 -$23.57 $0.00 -$23.57
Operating Supplies $322.86 $144.36 $196.83 $227.81 -$275.63 $57.60 $673.83
Total Resident Services -B- Operating Ex $480.28 $144.36 $493.81 $307.81 -$106.86 $291.00 $1,610.40
Transportation -B- Operating Expenses
Vehicle Fuel $40.00 $40.00 $0.00 $85.00 $185.00 $90.00 $440.00
Vehicle Lease – Bus & Van $0.00 $0.00 $1,287.76 $1,287.76 $0.00 $0.00 $2,575.52
Vehicle Maintenance $0.00 $1,614.10 $0.00 $0.00 $72.97 $0.00 $1,687.07
Vehicle Tag $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $147.79 $0.00 $147.79
Total Transportation -B- Operating Expe $40.00 $1,654.10 $1,287.76 $1,372.76 $405.76 $90.00 $4,850.38
Utilities, Insurance and Other
Insurance
Insurance – Auto $159.83 $159.83 $159.83 $159.83 $159.83 $159.83 $958.98
Insurance – General/Professional Liability $3,568.40 $3,568.40 $3,568.40 $3,568.40 $3,568.40 $3,568.40 $21,410.40
Insurance – Property $3,782.12 $3,782.12 $3,782.12 $3,782.12 $3,782.12 $3,782.12 $22,692.72
Insurance – Umbrella/Excess $1,666.84 $1,666.84 $1,666.84 $1,666.84 $1,666.84 $1,666.84 $10,001.04
Total Insurance $9,177.19 $9,177.19 $9,177.19 $9,177.19 $9,177.19 $9,177.19 $55,063.14
Management Fees
Management Fee $9,006.00 $7,700.00 $10,624.00 $8,309.00 $7,000.00 $7,500.00 $50,139.00
Total Management Fees $9,006.00 $7,700.00 $10,624.00 $8,309.00 $7,000.00 $7,500.00 $50,139.00
Taxes
Taxes Real Estate $0.00 $2,743.50 $2,743.50 $2,743.50 $2,453.00 $17,637.32 $28,320.82
Total Taxes $0.00 $2,743.50 $2,743.50 $2,743.50 $2,453.00 $17,637.32 $28,320.82
Utilities
Cable TV $916.25 $916.25 $916.25 $916.25 $996.22 $87.88 $4,749.10
Electricity $5,929.11 $5,729.29 $5,393.26 $5,582.53 $6,145.28 $5,596.90 $34,376.37
Gas $258.65 $267.24 $233.59 $381.74 $614.25 $427.46 $2,182.93
Telephone & Internet Communications $2,633.49 $4,441.67 $3,161.89 $2,097.94 $2,671.57 $535.45 $15,542.01
Trash Removal $605.50 $1,150.40 $607.35 $614.11 $1,004.89 $546.40 $4,528.65
Water & Sewer $5,749.64 $7,087.73 $6,031.65 $5,114.20 $5,343.38 $6,567.10 $35,893.70
Total Utilities $16,092.64 $19,592.58 $16,343.99 $14,706.77 $16,775.59 $13,761.19 $97,272.76
Total Utilities, Insurance and Other $34,275.83 $39,213.27 $38,888.68 $34,936.46 $35,405.78 $48,075.70 $230,795.72
Total Operating Expenses $184,575.11 $211,559.58 $213,035.08 $216,314.86 $248,207.18 $214,782.86 $1,288,474.67
Operating Income / (Loss) -$5,099.68 -$34,276.12 -$33,961.74 -$45,153.14 -$63,062.02 -$25,357.34 -$206,910.04
Other Income and Expense
Non-Operating Income/Expenses
Amortization Expense -$3,158.04 -$3,158.04 -$3,158.04 -$3,158.04 -$3,158.04 -$3,158.04 -$18,948.24
Depreciation Expense -$5,317.86 -$5,317.86 -$5,317.86 -$5,317.86 -$5,317.86 -$5,317.86 -$31,907.16
Extraordinary Loss -$2,353.73 -$1,864.63 -$5,175.62 -$10,573.97 $0.00 $0.00 -$19,967.95
Interest Expense -$16,557.81 -$16,736.93 -$18,328.37 -$16,557.81 -$16,557.81 -$16,557.81 -$101,296.54
Legal Expense $0.00 -$604.50 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 -$590.95 -$1,195.45
Vendor Rebates $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $593.59 $593.59
Total Non-Operating Income/Expenses -$27,387.44 -$27,681.96 -$31,979.89 -$35,607.68 -$25,033.71 -$25,031.07 -$172,721.75
Total Other Income and Expense -$27,387.44 -$27,681.96 -$31,979.89 -$35,607.68 -$25,033.71 -$25,031.07 -$172,721.75
Net Income / (Loss) before Tax -$32,487.12 -$61,958.08 -$65,941.63 -$80,760.82 -$88,095.73 -$50,388.41 -$379,631.79
Net Income -$32,487.12 -$61,958.08 -$65,941.63 -$80,760.82 -$88,095.73 -$50,388.41 -$379,631.79
© 2020 CBRE, Inc.

Total Comprehensive Income -$32,487.12 -$61,958.08 -$65,941.63 -$80,760.82 -$88,095.73 -$50,388.41 -$379,631.79
© 2020 CBRE, Inc.

Income Statement
Ventura Hills
For the month ended 31 December 2019
2 3
Jan-20 Dec-19 Nov-19 Oct-19 Sep-19 Aug-19 Jul-19 Jun-19 May-19 Apr-19 Mar-19 Feb-19 Total
Revenue
Operating Revenue
Other Income
Employee Meals $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $13.93 $88.07 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $102.00
Late Fee AL $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
Total Other Income -$838.25 -$91.40 -$126.75 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $13.93 $88.07 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 -$954.40
Total Operating Revenue -$838.25 -$91.40 -$126.75 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $13.93 $88.07 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 -$954.40
Room & Board AL
*Room & Board – AL
Respite Care AL $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $2,250.00 $2,250.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $4,500.00
Room & Board AL $140,129.78 $136,413.32 $137,678.40 $136,396.62 $126,981.36 $141,255.80 $142,149.70 $143,232.10 $144,730.62 $146,857.03 $152,268.59 $133,997.42 $1,682,090.74
Total *Room & Board – AL $140,129.78 $136,413.32 $137,678.40 $136,396.62 $126,981.36 $141,255.80 $144,399.70 $145,482.10 $144,730.62 $146,857.03 $152,268.59 $133,997.42 $1,686,590.74
Additional Services – AL
Additional Care Services AL $0.00 $0.00 $54.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $17,105.38 $26,544.59 $29,157.06 $32,077.40 $36,700.67 -$2,357.86 $139,281.24
Additional Resident AL $1,000.00 $800.00 $1,800.00 $1,800.00 $1,800.00 $104.92 $1,938.36 $840.00 $840.00 $0.00 $0.00 $181.50 $11,104.78
Additonal Meals / Tray Svc AL $0.00 $0.00 $300.00 $300.00 $310.00 $320.00 $320.00 $310.00 $50.00 $280.00 $0.00 $0.00 $2,190.00
Beauty Salon Contra AL $0.00 $0.00 -$62.00 -$364.00 -$577.00 -$313.00 -$507.75 -$618.00 -$425.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 -$2,866.75
Beauty Salon AL $0.00 $0.00 $10,331.50 $9,420.00 $10,093.50 $9,897.00 $494.00 $533.00 $985.00 $477.00 $0.00 $0.00 $42,231.00
Care Level 1 AL $2,636.93 $3,159.00 $3,821.17 $4,912.00 $4,666.10 $3,612.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $3,271.23 $26,078.43
Care Level 2 AL $8,087.00 $8,087.00 $8,025.00 $8,107.91 $9,077.81 $8,568.00 $49,952.72
Care Level 3 AL $2,361.29 $1,800.00 $72.79 $732.05 $623.85 $835.33 $6,425.31
Community Fees AL $0.00 $6,250.00 $1,000.00 $3,500.00 $0.00 $2,000.00 $0.00 $4,000.00 $750.00 $6,250.00 $1,000.00 $0.00 $24,750.00
Guest Meals AL $0.00 $0.00 $240.00 $0.00 $132.00 $180.00 $216.00 $0.00 $100.00 $130.00 $10.00 $0.00 $1,008.00
Guest Suite AL $0.00 $0.00 $625.00 $0.00 $0.00 $625.00
Housekeeping AL $204.00 $204.00 $204.00 $204.00 $204.00 $279.00 $0.00 $0.00 $54.00 $73.00 $0.00 $0.00 $1,426.00
Medication Fee AL $7,985.62 $9,229.65 $9,871.96 $11,300.63 $10,650.49 $13,800.33 $12,458.00 $450.00 $450.00 $60.00 $0.00 $0.00 $76,256.68
Miscellaneous Resident Charge (AL) -$2,767.99 -$3,674.12 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $1.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 -$6,441.11
Pendant Fee AL $359.10 $383.77 $510.00 $348.00 $499.53 $347.00 $347.00 $347.00 $549.00 $403.07 $378.40 $0.00 $4,471.87
Pet Fee AL $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $800.00 $800.00 $0.00 $0.00 $1,600.00
Rate Lock Fees AL $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $1,695.00 $0.00 $0.00 $1,695.00
Total Additional Services – AL $19,865.95 $26,528.33 $36,793.42 $40,260.59 $37,480.28 $39,630.58 $32,370.99 $32,407.59 $33,310.06 $42,245.47 $38,089.07 $1,094.87 $380,077.20
Concessions – AL
Concession – Rent AL $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 -$9,868.12 -$7,489.80 -$10,959.12 -$14,498.27 -$14,735.87 $0.00 -$57,551.18
Concessions – Additional Resident AL -$200.00 $0.00 -$9,573.82 -$9,595.00 -$9,618.12 -$9,618.12 -$38,605.06
Concessions – Care Services AL -$3,795.00 -$4,254.68 -$750.00 -$250.00 -$250.00 -$250.00 -$9,549.68
Concessions – Rent AL $7,235.87 $5,183.93 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 -$5,833.87 $6,585.93
Total Concessions – AL $3,240.87 $929.25 -$10,323.82 -$9,845.00 -$9,868.12 -$9,868.12 -$9,868.12 -$7,489.80 -$10,959.12 -$14,498.27 -$14,735.87 -$5,833.87 -$99,119.99
Total Room & Board AL $163,236.60 $163,870.90 $164,148.00 $166,812.21 $154,593.52 $171,018.26 $166,902.57 $170,399.89 $167,081.56 $174,604.23 $175,621.79 $129,258.42 $1,967,547.95
Room & Board MC
*Room & Board – MC
Room & Board MC $13,432.37 $5,995.00 $4,995.00 $4,995.00 $3,439.18 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $32,856.55
Total *Room & Board – MC $13,432.37 $5,995.00 $4,995.00 $4,995.00 $3,439.18 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $32,856.55
Total Room & Board MC $27,027.17 $9,223.00 $4,995.00 $4,995.00 $3,439.18 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $49,679.35
Total Revenue $189,425.52 $173,002.50 $169,016.25 $171,807.21 $158,032.70 $171,018.26 $166,916.50 $170,487.96 $167,081.56 $174,604.23 $175,621.79 $129,258.42 $2,016,272.90
Gross Profit $189,425.52 $173,002.50 $169,016.25 $171,807.21 $158,032.70 $171,018.26 $166,916.50 $170,487.96 $167,081.56 $174,604.23 $175,621.79 $129,258.42 $2,016,272.90
Operating Expenses
Administration -A- Payroll
Business Office Director $2,310.02 $4,611.41 $4,457.42 $4,613.27 $4,457.52 $4,426.13 $3,506.71 $4,597.68 $4,002.83 $4,539.13 $6,566.61 $1,104.52 $49,193.25
Employee Benefits- Admin $277.11 $904.84 $833.30 $861.74 $833.95 $487.96 $861.74 $833.64 $861.11 $833.34 $861.11 $138.89 $8,588.73
Employee Recruiting – Admin $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $238.00 $0.00 $0.00 $7,800.00 $0.00 $8,038.00
Employee Uniforms – Admin $98.52 $0.00 $190.12 $235.87 $0.00 $395.27 $363.32 $299.95 $485.92 $16.69 $755.61 $71.01 $2,912.28
Employment Screenings – Admin $395.90 $486.90 $690.52 $1,871.89 $198.00 $288.52 $416.57 $405.44 $498.82 $988.26 $495.00 $0.00 $6,735.82
Executive Director $12,175.01 $8,076.92 $12,115.38 $10,099.16 $6,660.90 $6,761.42 $6,661.43 $6,760.90 $6,661.43 $6,810.90 $6,661.42 $0.00 $89,444.87
Executive Director Bonus $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $1,700.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $150.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $1,850.00
Executive Director Taxes / Benefits $1,955.84 $819.91 $1,309.23 $1,459.31 $976.16 $802.42 $792.14 $803.63 $808.55 $791.46 $889.24 $0.00 $11,407.89
Holiday Pay – Admin $247.88 $395.08 $321.48 $0.00 $68.26 $68.26 $298.52 $49.24 $341.61 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $1,790.33
Overtime – Admin $131.78 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $13.95 $34.57 $79.83 $35.77 $3.20 $35.33 $1.14 $335.57
Payroll Service Fee $2,431.66 $2,597.82 $2,662.16 $2,666.95 $2,386.29 $2,691.41 $2,899.30 $2,813.91 $2,868.49 $2,790.76 $3,746.19 $1,579.48 $32,134.42
Payroll Taxes – Admin $611.02 $690.77 $518.48 $544.15 $518.93 $545.00 $548.23 $548.20 $1,805.87 $3,589.02 $1,075.51 $187.10 $11,182.28
PTO/Sick Leave Wages – Admin $819.57 $807.27 $290.48 $277.22 $291.51 $583.20 $1,182.09 $47.68 $614.99 $91.30 $397.37 $91.32 $5,494.00
Receptionist/Concierge $1,791.31 $1,980.55 $1,708.22 $2,222.53 $1,966.14 $2,032.47 $2,144.52 $2,185.79 $2,172.11 $2,077.47 $3,084.99 $546.67 $23,912.77
Salaries & Wages – Hourly – Admin $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
Workers Comp – Admin $2,452.83 $1,129.58 $1,129.58 $1,129.58 $1,129.58 $1,129.58 $1,129.58 $1,129.58 $1,129.58 $1,129.58 $1,129.58 $1,129.58 $14,878.21
Total Administration -A- Payroll $25,698.45 $22,501.05 $26,226.37 $25,981.67 $21,187.24 $20,225.59 $20,838.72 $20,793.47 $22,437.08 $23,661.11 $33,497.96 $4,849.71 $267,898.42
Administration -B- Operating Expenses
Bad Debt Other $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $141.73 $141.73
Bank Fees $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $31.17 $0.00 $31.17
Cell Phones Directors/Managers $0.00 $105.00 $70.00 $70.00 $87.50 $87.50 $140.00 $105.00 $35.00 $128.94 $100.00 $0.00 $928.94
Computer Software Maintenace $1,159.96 $1,075.02 $706.94 $1,032.38 $1,054.20 $3,280.27 $137.84 $768.48 $874.20 $982.54 $1,726.14 $1,109.90 $13,907.87
Copier Lease $1,704.07 $1,321.31 $1,897.91 $954.70 $1,466.90 $451.62 $519.35 $514.32 $617.72 $726.15 $1,330.89 $664.71 $12,169.65
Copier Maintenance & Overages $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $186.40 $0.00 $0.00 $749.91 $0.00 $947.92 $787.38 $2,161.13 $0.00 $4,832.74
Dues & Subscriptions – Admin $0.00 $0.00 $1,040.03 $1,084.29 $1,117.49 $1,125.90 $1,319.91 $1,324.47 $316.13 $1,892.39 $5.00 $106.92 $9,332.53
Employee Appreciation – Admin $0.00 $67.57 $89.18 $24.67 $0.00 $11.44 $0.00 $29.60 $324.20 $0.00 $82.18 $212.82 $841.66
Flowers – Admin $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $48.49 $0.00 $0.00 $48.49
Food-Admin $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $10.42 $10.42
Interest / Finance Charges $76.77 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $216.34 $0.00 $0.00 $82.23 $82.23 $82.23 $82.23 $82.23 $704.26
Internet $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $103.86 $103.86
IT Email Services $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $144.54 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $176.13 $320.67
Licenses & Permits Admin $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $709.25 $372.49 $0.00 $0.00 $1,081.74
Management Company Travel $454.32 $4,715.67 $3,851.63 $3,461.48 $1,694.42 $0.00 $2,360.09 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $12,000.00 $5,271.88 $33,809.49
Meals & Entertainment – Admin $442.38 $352.47 $199.45 $344.56 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $130.06 $1,468.92
Office Supplies – Admin $38.11 $0.00 $114.53 $633.94 $301.68 $735.27 $558.68 $877.64 $1,281.97 $676.51 $632.29 $0.00 $5,850.62
Postage & Delivery $105.14 $64.27 $164.06 $44.28 $247.61 $196.23 $249.27 $178.84 $486.35 $230.34 $175.29 $473.96 $2,615.64
Postage Meter – Lease Equip $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $391.28 $32.00 $290.59 $0.00 $713.87
Professional Fees Accounting $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 -$2,844.67 $0.00 $0.00 $336.43 $336.43 $350.93 $1,820.88 $0.00
Professional Fees Other $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $525.00 $0.00 $0.00 -$87.08 $437.92
Resident Relations $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $49.77 $86.59 $0.00 $0.00 $86.02 $0.00 $0.00 $16.17 $238.55
Training and Meetings – Admin $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $425.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $4,105.20 $0.00 $0.00 $4,530.20
Total Administration -B- Operating Expenses $3,980.75 $7,701.31 $8,133.73 $8,310.19 $6,235.91 $3,285.11 $6,035.05 $3,880.58 $7,013.70 $10,352.60 $18,967.84 $10,224.17 $94,120.94
Assisted Living -A- Payroll
Bonuses – AL $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 -$32.14 $82.14 $0.00 $1,476.79 $1,148.21 $0.00 $71.43 $203.57 $0.00 $2,950.00
Employee Benefits Other – AL $429.11 $656.80 $483.22 $497.18 $486.95 -$107.93 $470.50 $676.75 $1,174.44 $1,062.24 $2,338.12 $610.22 $8,777.60
Employee Medical Insurance – AL $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $5,474.61 $5,474.61
Employee Recruiting – AL $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $68.30 $68.30
Employment Screenings – AL $21.58 $35.84 $20.10 $98.09 $0.00 $31.94 $23.31 $56.29 $79.54 $82.12 $0.00 $0.00 $448.81
Health Services Director – AL $5,051.50 $6,389.40 $576.92 -$1,368.55 $4,680.09 $4,663.20 $4,882.83 $5,034.88 $5,017.99 $4,088.74 $4,440.11 $1,790.61 $45,247.72
Holiday Pay – AL $3,315.15 $3,976.32 $2,120.42 $0.00 $548.92 $548.93 $2,133.89 $351.96 $1,827.29 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $14,822.88
Overtime – AL $4,462.74 $4,410.28 $5,912.54 $8,226.31 $6,568.87 $3,408.36 $4,013.03 $3,214.03 $3,372.76 $2,851.42 $8,789.35 $983.85 $56,213.54
Payroll Taxes – AL $4,934.65 $4,966.10 $4,334.74 $3,835.40 $3,332.15 $3,537.52 $4,060.80 $4,678.00 $3,992.34 $2,464.54 $6,152.82 $3,056.43 $49,345.49
PTO/Sick Leave Wages – AL $1,166.79 $1,092.86 $332.51 $976.05 $1,067.99 $1,182.22 $470.21 $1,837.03 $1,147.95 $796.10 $1,222.57 -$13,430.91 -$2,138.63
Retirement Employee Matching – AL $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 -$40.65 -$40.65
Salaries & Wages AL CNA/Res Assistant $14,654.02 $16,247.52 $20,227.02 $16,334.90 $17,984.23 $20,948.53 $20,352.24 $22,706.13 $23,140.85 $20,619.35 $27,333.54 $4,491.15 $225,039.48
Salaries & Wages AL LPN $2,936.37 $4,651.23 $5,048.78 $1,243.54 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $2,952.44 $1,752.34 $18,584.70
Salaries & Wages AL Med Tech $13,462.75 $14,418.72 $13,969.32 $18,424.09 $8,042.61 $8,302.91 $10,263.29 $13,125.08 $9,084.53 $7,236.05 $12,442.57 $2,735.04 $131,506.96
Workers Comp – AL $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $295.66 $295.66
Total Assisted Living -A- Payroll $50,434.66 $56,845.07 $53,025.57 $48,234.87 $42,793.95 $42,515.68 $48,146.89 $52,828.36 $48,837.69 $39,271.99 $65,875.09 $7,786.65 $556,596.47
Assisted Living -B- Operating Expenses
Consultants – AL $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $380.77 $0.00 $0.00 $380.77
Contract Labor – AL $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $8,494.05 $0.00 $9,217.92 $20,377.88 $18,394.84 $30,830.85 $4,386.33 $0.00 $91,701.87
Dues & Subscriptions – AL $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $105.00 $0.00 $100.00 $93.95 $298.95
EMAR $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $789.22 $789.22 $0.00 $0.00 $1,578.44
Equipment Lease – AL $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $1,208.41 $1,208.41
Hazardous Waste Disposal – AL $110.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $50.00 $0.00 -$282.13 -$122.13
Licenses & Permits AL $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
Medical Supplies $265.72 $557.56 $181.13 $0.00 $202.60 $0.00 $6.50 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $1,213.51
Mileage – AL $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $206.48 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $206.48
Supplies – Medical/ Charged to Residents AL $120.64 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $1.88 $0.00 $122.52
Wellness Supplies $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $362.25 $87.93 $232.76 $167.19 $150.82 $1,312.33 $417.98 $55.11 $2,786.37
Total Assisted Living -B- Operating Expenses $496.36 $557.56 $181.13 $0.00 $9,058.90 $87.93 $9,663.66 $20,545.07 $19,439.88 $33,363.17 $4,906.19 $1,075.34 $99,375.19
Dining -A- Payroll
Cooks $8,012.61 $8,771.56 $9,911.03 $8,098.68 $8,141.08 $7,625.18 $7,808.64 $8,033.81 $8,509.29 $8,808.61 $13,489.72 $2,784.80 $99,995.01
Dining Room Waitstaff $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $486.24 $486.24
Director of Dining Service $4,253.20 $4,260.90 $4,113.95 $5,544.89 $5,366.01 $5,366.02 $4,042.41 $4,775.76 $5,291.52 $5,209.71 $7,328.33 $868.29 $56,420.99
Employee Benefits Other – Dining $966.37 $1,932.53 $2,069.74 $1,868.45 $2,866.20 $1,428.30 $2,602.83 $2,550.72 $2,669.10 $2,584.83 $2,670.41 $430.71 $24,640.19
Employee Uniforms – Dining $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $465.36 $465.36
Employment Screenings – Dining $2.20 $2.18 $15.57 $13.69 $0.00 $1.10 $13.12 $15.62 $8.02 $17.31 $0.00 $0.00 $88.81
Holiday Pay – Dining $1,308.46 $1,157.51 $733.80 $0.00 $201.04 $201.05 $779.00 $116.13 $730.76 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $5,227.75
Overtime – Dining $0.00 $0.00 $66.81 $507.04 $307.54 $33.32 $44.86 $135.93 $582.11 $36.73 $149.85 $0.00 $1,864.19
Payroll Taxes – Dining $1,528.24 $1,483.87 $1,357.76 $1,212.45 $1,170.62 $1,264.69 $1,386.50 $1,291.82 $1,177.17 $941.64 $2,324.29 $418.48 $15,557.53
PTO/Sick Leave Wages – Dining $408.26 $1,738.58 $1,646.27 $659.20 $247.20 $965.95 $2,455.68 $1,377.17 $0.00 $167.37 $975.27 $255.67 $10,896.62
Utility Workers $0.00 $83.48 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $1,314.15 $1,548.36 $1,103.35 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $4,049.34
Total Dining -A- Payroll $16,479.34 $19,430.61 $19,914.93 $17,904.40 $18,299.69 $18,199.76 $20,681.40 $19,400.31 $18,967.97 $17,766.20 $26,937.87 $5,709.55 $219,692.03
Dining -B- Operating Expenses
China $0.00 $0.00 $82.39 $0.00 $0.00 $139.83 $0.00 $490.28 $198.70 $458.55 $0.00 $0.00 $1,369.75
Contract Services – Menu $100.00 $100.00 $100.00 $100.00 $100.00 $77.52 $79.50 $79.50 $79.50 $150.94 $141.98 $79.50 $1,188.44
© 2020 CBRE, Inc.

Dishwasher Chemicals $276.50 $227.20 $195.62 $93.20 $491.44 $493.58 $250.58 $910.47 $0.00 $608.14 $222.04 $129.53 $3,898.30
Dishwasher Lease $8,140.92 $667.27 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $887.10 $887.10 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $312.88 $10,895.27
Grease Trap Cleaning $843.25 $0.00 $0.00 $1,093.25 $0.00 $0.00 $1,255.73 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $3,192.23
Kitchen Equipment R&M $0.00 $148.29 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $97.44 $245.73
Kitchen Hood Service $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $368.05 $0.00 $368.05
Kitchen Supplies $394.25 $588.08 $101.60 $379.80 $329.39 $590.55 $477.48 $408.93 $71.44 $401.23 $542.76 $14.37 $4,299.88
Operating Supplies – Dining $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $7.62 $184.51 $0.00 $24.87 $0.00 $0.00 $217.00
Paper & Plastic Supplies – Dining $205.97 $186.00 $113.53 $64.73 $40.07 $144.39 $425.21 $145.92 $0.00 $242.50 $353.37 $0.00 $1,921.69
Raw Food $9,042.96 $9,399.45 $19,894.40 $10,656.24 $9,032.58 $12,043.78 $19,440.90 $18,974.36 $26,806.77 $31,868.95 -$14,057.63 $6,958.54 $160,061.30
Supplies – Cleaning – Dining $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $415.68 $377.34 $915.64 $1,392.30 $358.20 $0.00 $1,066.30 $480.71 $0.00 $5,006.17
Training and Meetings – Dining $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $267.00 $0.00 $0.00 $267.00
Vendor Rebates – Dining $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 -$406.81 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 -$406.81
Total Dining -B- Operating Expenses $19,039.61 $11,439.13 $20,587.51 $12,802.90 $10,332.06 $14,405.29 $24,216.42 $22,439.27 $27,156.41 $35,088.48 -$12,316.77 $7,592.26 $192,782.57
Housekeeping -A- Payroll
Employee Benefits Other – Housekeeping -$2.05 $3.94 $1.35 $1.39 $1.35 $1.21 $2.79 $3.04 $2.49 $1.69 $1.75 $0.28 $19.23
Employee Uniforms – Housekeeping $207.74 $0.00 $89.92 $51.70 $0.00 $0.00 $349.36
Employment Screenings – Housekeeping $0.38 $0.36 $2.53 $2.64 $0.00 $0.18 $1.25 $0.23 $1.90 $4.13 $0.00 $0.00 $13.60
Holiday Pay – Housekeeping $200.48 $155.29 $87.20 $0.00 $114.64 $114.64 $209.35 $33.08 $220.68 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $1,135.36
Housekeepers $1,821.84 $2,735.04 $2,325.67 $2,626.94 $2,508.92 $2,585.11 $3,200.55 $3,159.12 $3,218.20 $3,271.60 $3,863.27 $901.54 $32,217.80
Payroll Taxes – Housekeeping $199.81 $296.27 $203.36 $207.20 $203.83 $240.11 $344.11 $364.37 $330.28 $230.86 $440.09 $74.53 $3,134.82
PTO/Sick Leave Wages – Housekeeping $0.00 $81.75 $245.25 $81.75 $40.87 $225.68 $155.67 $261.60 $87.20 $0.00 $238.05 $0.00 $1,417.82
Total Housekeeping -A- Payroll $2,428.20 $3,272.65 $2,955.28 $2,971.62 $2,869.61 $3,166.93 $3,913.72 $3,821.44 $3,860.75 $3,508.28 $4,543.16 $976.35 $38,287.99
Housekeeping -B- Operating Expenses
Cleaning Supplies – Housekeeping $399.11 $610.27 $38.91 $236.13 $94.30 $300.61 $762.06 $0.00 $0.00 $245.94 $578.09 -$48.34 $3,217.08
Laundry Supplies $0.00 $0.00 $324.36 $0.00 $301.54 $150.78 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $413.47 $0.00 $1,190.15
Operating Supplies – Housekeeping $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $1,026.43 $638.65 $429.45 $344.11 $162.20 $555.70 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $3,156.54
Paper & Plastic Supplies – Housekeeping $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $129.33 $0.00 $129.33
Total Housekeeping -B- Operating Expenses $840.40 $928.35 $299.18 $1,262.56 $1,163.82 $880.84 $1,106.17 $162.20 $555.70 $245.94 $991.56 -$48.34 $8,388.38
Maintenance & Repair -A- Payroll
Director of Engineering $3,124.92 $3,401.16 $3,616.18 $4,138.84 $3,912.82 $4,378.97 $4,089.60 $3,318.86 $4,073.14 $4,011.43 $6,028.29 $685.71 $44,779.92
Employee Appreciation – Maintenance $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $16.79 $0.00 $16.79
Employee Benefits Other – Maintenance $9.97 $27.59 $37.02 $1.39 $1.35 $0.77 $1.39 $1.53 $1.75 $5.20 $7.20 $1.16 $96.32
Employment Screenings – Maintenance $0.94 $0.88 $6.34 $29.74 $0.00 $0.44 $2.01 $0.36 $11.96 $10.20 $0.00 $0.00 $62.87
Engineering Tech $735.69 $3,382.86 $2,342.72 $2,525.13 $2,349.70 $1,870.55 $1,413.89 $1,293.66 $3,271.48 $3,463.81 $3,150.61 $914.25 $26,714.35
Holiday Pay – Maintenance $358.14 $357.26 $289.56 $0.00 $84.37 $84.38 $178.29 $40.56 $349.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $1,741.56
Overtime – Maintenance $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $4.44 $119.50 $109.69 $8.48 $0.00 $242.11
Payroll Taxes – Maintenance $633.82 $613.68 $575.37 $605.94 $585.36 $552.96 $458.86 $448.90 $629.84 $485.14 $1,022.35 $181.99 $6,794.21
PTO/Sick Leave Wages – Maintenance $277.02 $824.28 $423.77 $240.14 $324.89 $377.28 $150.91 $776.91 $240.53 $0.00 $366.72 $0.00 $4,002.45
Total Maintenance & Repair -A- Payroll $5,140.50 $8,607.71 $7,290.96 $7,541.18 $7,275.28 $7,265.35 $6,294.95 $5,885.22 $8,697.20 $8,085.47 $10,583.65 $1,783.11 $84,450.58
Maintenance & Repair -B- Operating Expenses
Building Repairs $0.00 $0.00 $622.35 $125.83 $534.71 $0.00 $0.00 $1,687.61 $9,107.37 $1,307.20 $863.88 $924.37 $15,173.32
Chemicals – Maintenance $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $57.35 $0.00 $57.35
Common Area Cleaning & Repairs $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $71.21 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $197.42 $0.00 $0.00 $268.63
Contract Labor – Maintenance $0.00 $389.70 $0.00 $1,041.33 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $368.05 $551.14 $0.00 $368.05 $2,718.27
Dues & Subscriptions – Maintenance $0.00 $194.00 $97.00 $0.00 $97.00 $97.00 $97.00 $97.00 $97.00 $0.00 $0.00 $97.00 $873.00
Electrical Repair $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $45.84 $45.84
Emergency Alert / Pendants $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $1,505.87 $1,841.83 $3,347.70
Exterminating Contract $1,455.21 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $771.20 $811.88 $0.00 -$150.00 $2,888.29
Fire Alarm & Fire Sprinkler R&M/Contractsvs $3,006.87 $1,633.07 $2,749.96 $3,136.00 $0.00 $2,350.50 $2,825.51 $6,104.10 $1,445.71 $4,475.60 $0.00 $0.00 $27,727.32
Fire Extinguisher $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $930.95 $0.00 $0.00 $930.95
Furniture & Equip Non CapX – Maintenance $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $306.81 $150.00 $64.94 $521.75
General Maintenance Supplies $717.44 $486.90 $484.31 $948.34 $2,004.36 $1,322.29 $459.00 $1,067.00 $1,521.84 $709.29 $209.23 $551.00 $10,481.00
General R&M $0.00 $123.75 $0.00 $98.03 $0.00 $0.00 $300.41 $495.13 $1,755.17 $350.73 $0.00 $0.00 $3,123.22
Generator Service $1,269.80 $0.00 $0.00 $1,409.89 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $948.42 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $3,628.11
Grounds Contract $176.73 $2,142.00 $2,318.73 $2,484.35 $2,318.73 $2,805.87 $2,498.15 $2,878.94 $2,318.73 $2,805.87 $7,760.47 -$1,359.00 $29,149.57
HVAC Repair $0.00 $0.00 $780.19 $2,262.38 $0.00 $1,437.26 $0.00 $2,158.32 $3,693.09 $2,493.14 $876.72 $0.00 $13,701.10
HVAC Supplies $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $1,881.36 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $1,881.36
Landscaping Other (Irrigation) $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $779.40 $222.93 $0.00 $1,002.33
Landscaping Seasonal Plants $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $76.51 $0.00 $101.28 $0.00 $0.00 $177.79
Licenses & Permits Maintenance $0.00 $0.00 $40.00 $0.00 $0.00 $40.00
Light Bulbs/Electrical Supplies $214.43 $114.84 $0.00 $301.35 $164.23 $163.17 $158.08 $169.89 $512.20 $2,383.07 $1,235.98 $0.00 $5,417.24
Maintenace Equipment Repair $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $8.93 $0.00 $0.00 $228.18 $0.00 $237.11
Other Maintenance $0.00 $37.35 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $421.75 $97.00 $0.00 $556.10
Painting R&M $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $663.49 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $663.49
Plumbing R&M $2,200.00 $0.00 $1,755.00 $4,220.00 $385.00 $0.00 $2,940.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $11,500.00
Plumbing Supplies $0.00 $693.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $3,600.00 $0.00 $166.27 $0.00 $4,459.27
Turnover Suites $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 -$631.40 $631.40 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
Water Softner System – Supplies $479.14 $635.63 $1,172.26 $404.42 $546.13 $531.21 $464.08 $530.35 $367.14 $411.88 $411.88 $644.43 $6,598.55
Total Maintenance & Repair -B- Operating Expenses $11,838.35 $6,773.47 $10,019.80 $16,503.13 $7,556.03 $10,549.13 $9,742.23 $17,472.16 $26,852.39 $19,037.41 $12,279.89 $1,186.63 $149,810.62
Marketing -A- Payroll
Employee Benefits Other – Marketing -$267.13 $302.80 $271.10 $504.63 $488.37 $291.68 $503.25 $489.63 $508.66 $492.26 $508.67 $82.04 $4,175.96
Employment Screenings – Marketing $0.82 $0.62 $4.31 $6.09 $0.00 $0.60 $9.99 $0.41 $3.09 $6.97 $0.00 $0.00 $32.90
Holiday Pay – Marketing $163.59 $205.09 $184.34 $0.00 $114.66 $114.66 $388.66 $29.90 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $1,200.90
Marketing Director $3,886.56 $3,396.53 $4,081.39 $4,081.72 $4,950.06 $5,081.73 $3,370.71 $4,423.73 $4,311.74 $4,825.14 $6,427.00 $731.57 $49,567.88
Move-In Coordinator $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $2,546.05 $2,546.05
Overtime – Marketing $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $98.49 $11.70 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $110.19
Payroll Taxes – Marketing $411.87 $440.34 $275.38 $391.78 $918.87 $761.69 $666.52 $453.47 $271.97 $263.72 $683.94 $117.10 $5,656.65
PTO/Sick Leave Wages – Marketing $293.10 $628.58 -$225.09 $1,040.94 $0.00 $0.00 $539.84 $13.17 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $2,290.54
Sales Counselor – Marketing $0.00 $0.00 -$440.91 $67.55 $6,514.26 $3,311.56 $3,072.18 $1,036.83 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $359.68 $13,921.15
Total Marketing -A- Payroll $4,488.81 $4,973.96 $4,150.52 $6,092.71 $12,986.22 $9,660.41 $8,562.85 $6,447.14 $5,095.46 $5,588.09 $7,619.61 $3,836.44 $79,502.22
Marketing -B- Operating Expenses
Advertising $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $416.00 $225.00 $0.00 $0.00 $995.00 $258.98 $1,894.98
Collateral $768.14 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $168.79 $0.00 $1,865.75 $0.00 $0.00 $1,212.97 $4,015.65
Community Outreach $0.00 $37.35 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $260.90 $178.62 $244.33 $451.25 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $1,172.45
Consultants – Marketing $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $4,163.24 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $4,163.24
Contract Labor – Marketing $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $1,900.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $1,900.00
Digital Media $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $10,227.08 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $10,227.08
Direct Mail $140.66 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $2,015.80 $975.00 $0.00 $7,631.25 $10,762.71
Dues & Subscriptions – Marketing $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $100.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $100.00
E-Mail Marketing $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
Event Outreach Flyers $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $84.50 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $84.50
Events $133.93 $0.00 $134.51 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $223.93 $114.71 $0.00 $607.08
Furniture & Equip Non CapX – Marketing $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $2,526.65 $203.56 $0.00 $82.25 $0.00 $0.00 $2,812.46
Leads/CRM $5,169.95 $579.57 $579.57 $896.57 $579.57 $597.00 $579.57 $436.00 $0.00 $554.15 $1,130.40 $218.75 $11,321.10
Lunch & Learn VA Seminar $0.00 $39.65 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $388.60 $428.25
Marketing Plan Development $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $176.19 $0.00 $0.00 $176.19
Move-In / Resident Gifts $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $23.37 $30.44 $0.00 $53.81
Paid Placement Search Marketing $1,249.86 $5,735.95 $5,735.98 $5,735.98 $6,110.92 $6,601.60 $6,298.63 $0.00 $966.87 $966.87 $0.00 $3,093.13 $42,495.79
Premiums/Giveaways $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $100.66 $100.66
Print AD Development / Updates $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
Prospect Gifts/Meals $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $71.60 $71.60
Public Relations $0.00 $0.00 $199.92 $19.98 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $104.71 $21.65 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $346.26
Referral Fees $0.00 $0.00 $2,800.00 $0.00 $5,950.00 $600.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $8,000.00 $0.00 $2,500.00 $19,850.00
Social Media Marketing & Oversight $987.29 $988.38 $988.37 $988.38 $988.38 $1,454.00 $1,363.48 $0.00 $635.37 $2,041.62 $0.00 $666.62 $11,101.89
Supplies – Marketing $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $41.44 $7.57 $880.00 $412.98 $0.00 $0.00 $1,341.99
Traditional Media $510.13 $718.31 $622.29 $1,022.76 $112.53 $200.00 $187.55 $0.00 $0.00 $195.00 $0.00 $0.00 $3,568.57
Travel – Marketing $1,760.63 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $259.60 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $488.57 $0.00 $2,508.80
Travel Meals – Marketing $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $228.11 $0.00 $228.11
Website Hosting $234.44 $224.62 $234.44 $342.15 $913.83 $798.00 $223.18 $0.00 $4,282.81 $195.31 $0.00 $195.31 $7,644.09
Total Marketing -B- Operating Expenses $11,383.11 $8,323.83 $11,295.08 $9,029.19 $14,685.67 $11,331.96 $12,168.41 $15,611.49 $13,019.50 $13,823.30 $2,956.79 $15,777.01 $139,405.34
Memory Care -A- Payroll
Bonuses – MC $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $50.00 $0.00 $25.00 $551.79 $198.21 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $825.00
Employee Benefits Other – MC -$203.96 $214.73 $9.44 $11.60 $14.42 $5.21 $12.20 $34.45 $313.88 $466.31 $1,128.21 $223.92 $2,230.41
Employment Screenings – MC $1.84 $8.93 $11.02 $11.38 $0.00 $8.18 $27.20 $24.90 $6.11 $20.78 $0.00 $0.00 $120.34
Holiday Pay – MC $1,095.50 $1,383.76 $934.87 $0.00 $349.95 $349.96 $554.40 $72.87 $392.84 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $5,134.15
Overtime – MC $909.30 $465.19 $431.73 $1,224.61 $788.27 $1,207.60 $1,664.67 $777.09 $472.72 $555.25 $1,569.28 $311.81 $10,377.52
Payroll Taxes – MC $1,123.07 $1,355.88 $1,120.68 $1,249.31 $968.15 $1,294.00 $1,472.87 $1,120.56 $898.18 $742.39 $1,390.06 $296.81 $13,031.96
PTO/Sick Leave Wages – MC $240.16 $1,179.84 $259.01 $1,175.69 $258.73 $594.50 $0.00 $162.40 $126.71 $300.28 $656.73 $201.74 $5,155.79
Salaries & Wages MC CNA/Res Assistant $3,610.18 $3,614.80 $6,261.40 $6,412.15 $5,254.73 $5,811.45 $5,857.50 $4,631.02 $4,888.60 $7,584.26 $7,662.85 $1,320.79 $62,909.73
Salaries & Wages MC Med Tech $4,106.74 $7,607.67 $4,510.24 $4,851.29 $3,934.20 $5,815.69 $6,255.34 $5,044.90 $4,026.56 $2,151.45 $3,072.58 $931.49 $52,308.15
Salary & Wages – MC $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $5,988.00 $5,988.00
Total Memory Care -A- Payroll $10,882.83 $15,830.80 $13,538.39 $14,986.03 $11,568.45 $15,111.59 $16,395.97 $12,066.40 $11,125.60 $11,820.72 $15,479.71 $9,274.56 $158,081.05
Memory Care -B- Operating Expenses
Wellness Supplies MC $125.00 $0.00 $129.08 $0.00 $132.65 $209.82 $162.82 $168.00 $234.48 $360.00 $4.73 $0.00 $1,526.58
Total Memory Care -B- Operating Expenses $125.00 $0.00 $129.08 $0.00 $132.65 $209.82 $162.82 $168.00 $234.48 $360.00 $4.73 $0.00 $1,526.58
Resident Services -A- Payroll
Activities Aid – Lifestyles $1,382.77 $2,017.99 $1,978.36 $2,118.72 $1,784.51 $1,704.02 $1,960.73 $1,856.76 $1,813.25 $1,973.71 $2,652.21 $412.28 $21,655.31
Director / Manager – Lifestyles -$156.32 $5,923.22 $6,386.94 $6,002.67 $6,445.95 $6,442.74 $5,901.88 $6,621.42 $5,345.72 $6,261.20 $9,218.13 $1,647.36 $66,040.91
Employee Appreciation – Lifestyles $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $17.32 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $17.32
Employee Benefits Other – Lifestlyes $516.51 $1,837.68 $2,469.05 $2,551.36 $2,469.08 $1,429.90 $2,551.37 $2,427.28 $2,465.03 $2,385.51 $2,305.12 $362.82 $23,770.71
Employment Screenings – Lifestyles $0.42 $1.18 $8.37 $8.77 $0.00 $0.66 $3.25 $0.59 $4.81 $10.42 $0.00 $0.00 $38.47
Holiday Pay – Lifestyles -$697.33 $1,143.21 $458.59 $0.00 $74.11 $74.11 $426.54 $43.26 $135.85 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $1,658.34
Payroll Taxes – Lifestyles -$87.62 $1,322.71 $670.81 $696.47 $660.22 $688.18 $690.91 $713.53 $653.40 $597.52 $1,334.64 $226.25 $8,167.02
PTO/Sick Leave Wages – Lifestlyes $1,231.07 $999.85 -$55.23 $982.91 $325.84 $775.08 $718.93 $171.97 $1,543.14 $263.37 $568.73 $49.03 $7,574.69
Total Resident Services -A- Payroll $3,069.79 $13,245.84 $11,916.89 $12,360.90 $11,759.71 $11,114.69 $12,253.61 $11,852.13 $11,961.20 $11,491.73 $16,078.83 $2,697.74 $129,803.06
Resident Services -B- Operating Expenses
Contract Entertainment $233.40 $0.00 $60.00 $115.00 $115.00 $125.00 $648.40
Decorations $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $57.98 $102.44 $0.00 $160.42
Food – Lifestyles $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $4.48 $27.79 $91.34 $116.78 $0.00 $0.00 $240.39
MC Program Engagement $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $16.34 $0.00 $0.00 $16.34
Office Supplies $0.00 $236.95 $0.00 $0.00 $91.66 $0.00 $328.61
Operating Supplies $57.60 $187.69 $43.59 $0.00 $361.41 $136.64 $145.40 $32.35 $45.47 $29.23 $0.00 $234.61 $1,273.99
Resident Activities/Entertainment $0.00 $0.00 $80.00 $139.74 $160.00 $0.00 $220.00 $288.94 $671.91 $770.62 $275.76 $168.01 $2,774.98
Special Events (Non Marketing) $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $30.16 $483.26 $1.07 $0.00 $514.49
Total Resident Services -B- Operating Expenses $291.00 $444.22 $183.59 $254.74 $728.07 $261.64 $369.88 $349.08 $838.88 $1,474.21 $379.27 $402.62 $5,977.20
Transportation -A- Payroll
Drivers $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $587.97 $934.06 $1,153.43 $1,142.97 $1,011.59 $1,705.05 $260.42 $6,795.49
Employment Screenings – Transportation $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.38 $0.07 $0.68 $1.47 $0.00 $0.00 $2.60
Payroll Taxes – Transportation $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $63.09 $100.22 $123.77 $105.50 $65.69 $182.95 $17.62 $658.84
Total Transportation -A- Payroll $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $651.06 $1,034.66 $1,277.27 $1,249.15 $1,078.75 $1,888.00 $278.04 $7,456.93
© 2020 CBRE, Inc.

Transportation -B- Operating Expenses
Vehicle Fuel $90.00 $142.77 $45.00 $235.55 $123.85 $135.58 $126.15 $116.35 $116.85 $49.55 $120.65 $0.00 $1,302.30
Vehicle Lease – Bus & Van $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $2,342.80 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $2,342.80
Vehicle Maintenance $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $163.03 $178.62 $0.00 $0.00 $37.13 $378.78
Vehicle Tag $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $179.25 $0.00 $179.25
Total Transportation -B- Operating Expenses $90.00 $142.77 $45.00 $235.55 $123.85 $135.58 $126.15 $2,622.18 $295.47 $49.55 $299.90 $37.13 $4,203.13
Utilities, Insurance and Other
Insurance $0.00 $0.00
Insurance – Auto $159.83 $264.13 $264.13 $264.13 $264.13 $264.13 $264.13 $264.13 $264.13 $264.13 $264.13 -$901.87 $1,899.26
Insurance – General/Professional Liability $3,568.40 $2,287.28 $2,287.28 $8,455.71 $8,455.71 $8,455.71 $8,455.71 $9,294.99 $9,294.99 $9,294.99 $9,294.99 $2,979.65 $82,125.41
Insurance – Property $3,782.12 $3,153.56 $3,153.56 $3,153.56 $3,153.56 $3,153.56 $3,153.56 $3,153.56 $3,153.56 $3,153.56 $3,153.56 $3,250.77 $38,568.49
Insurance – Umbrella/Excess $1,666.84 $1,080.34 $1,080.34 $1,080.34 $1,080.34 $1,080.34 $1,080.34 $1,080.34 $1,080.34 $1,080.34 $1,080.34 $1,080.34 $13,550.58
Total Insurance $9,177.19 $6,785.31 $6,785.31 $12,953.74 $12,953.74 $12,953.74 $12,953.74 $13,793.02 $13,793.02 $13,793.02 $13,793.02 $6,408.89 $136,143.74
Management Fees
Management Fee $7,500.00 $8,301.77 $7,000.00 $9,379.00 -$8,466.44 $9,019.00 $667.56 $8,281.24 $8,888.43 $12,000.00 $15,966.44 $16,771.80 $95,308.80
Total Management Fees $7,500.00 $8,301.77 $7,000.00 $9,379.00 -$8,466.44 $9,019.00 $667.56 $8,281.24 $8,888.43 $12,000.00 $15,966.44 $16,771.80 $95,308.80
Taxes
Taxes Real Estate $17,637.32 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $51.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $17,688.32
Total Taxes $17,637.32 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $51.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $17,688.32
Utilities
Cable TV $87.88 $87.88 $89.34 $92.06 $263.64 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $1,127.86 $985.17 $1,974.48 $4,708.31
Electricity $5,596.90 $5,844.17 $6,476.33 $8,594.56 -$9,111.89 $7,707.22 $15,487.49 $7,891.50 $7,970.92 $7,479.41 $5,838.30 -$181.57 $69,593.34
Gas $427.46 $419.14 $389.65 $278.80 $233.00 $78.53 $206.16 $627.93 $218.66 $375.25 $476.13 -$155.29 $3,575.42
Telephone & Internet Communications $535.45 $3,911.15 $961.70 $5,595.90 $910.35 $2,402.37 $542.98 $3,446.23 $3,058.90 $1,466.55 $2,310.46 $614.32 $25,756.36
Trash Removal $546.40 $546.40 $546.40 $546.40 $546.40 $546.40 $546.40 $546.40 $1,092.80 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $5,464.00
Water & Sewer $6,567.10 $4,569.93 $6,802.26 $6,606.03 $2,300.70 $5,607.08 $3,508.12 $6,188.02 $5,000.00 $4,309.47 $4,039.88 -$122.83 $55,375.76
Total Utilities $13,761.19 $15,378.67 $15,265.68 $21,713.75 -$4,857.80 $16,341.60 $20,291.15 $18,700.08 $17,341.28 $14,758.54 $13,649.94 $2,129.11 $164,473.19
Total Utilities, Insurance and Other $48,075.70 $30,465.75 $29,050.99 $44,046.49 -$370.50 $38,365.34 $33,912.45 $40,774.34 $40,022.73 $40,551.56 $43,409.40 $25,309.80 $413,614.05
Total Operating Expenses $214,782.86 $211,484.08 $218,944.00 $228,518.13 $178,386.61 $207,423.70 $235,626.01 $258,396.11 $267,661.24 $276,618.56 $254,382.68 $98,748.77 $2,650,972.75
Operating Income / (Loss) -$25,357.34 -$38,481.58 -$49,927.75 -$56,710.92 -$20,353.91 -$36,405.44 -$68,709.51 -$87,908.15 -$100,579.68 -$102,014.33 -$78,760.89 $30,509.65 -$634,699.85
Add-Backs
Management Company Travel Expense During Transition $12,000.00 $5,271.88 $17,271.88
Travel Expense for Department Head Training in Birmingham $4,105.20 $4,105.20
IT Transition Expenses (computer setup, etc.) -$262.16 $368.48 $474.20 $582.54 $1,326.14 $709.90 $3,199.10
One-time Marketing Expenses (website setup, initial mailing, etc.) $4,668.41 $8,111.49 $5,519.50 $6,323.30 -$4,543.21 $8,277.01 $28,356.50
Total $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $4,406.25 $8,479.97 $5,993.70 $11,011.04 $8,782.93 $14,258.79 $52,932.68
NOI (Excluding Transition Costs) -$25,357.34 -$38,481.58 -$49,927.75 -$56,710.92 -$20,353.91 -$36,405.44 -$64,303.26 -$79,428.18 -$94,585.98 -$91,003.29 -$69,977.96 $44,768.44 -$581,767.17
Other Income and Expense
Unrealized Gain / (Loss) $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
Non-Operating Income/Expenses
Depreciation and Amortization -$8,475.90 -$22,851.63 -$22,851.63 -$22,851.63 -$22,851.63 -$22,851.63 -$22,851.63 -$22,851.63 -$22,851.63 -$22,851.63 -$22,851.63 -$22,851.63 -$259,843.83
Interest Expense -$16,557.81 -$18,559.12 -$18,559.12 -$18,559.12 -$18,559.12 -$18,559.12 -$18,559.12 -$111,354.74 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 -$239,267.27
Legal Expense (Acquisition & Licensing) -$590.95 -$501.67 $0.00 -$2,752.50 $0.00 $0.00 -$6,392.44 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 -$10,237.56
Marketing Cost – Start Up $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
Professional Fees – Property Tax Exemption Application $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 -$8,277.23 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 -$8,277.23
Owner Other Expense $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 -$1,051.29 -$1,051.29
Start Up Cost $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 -$17.17 $0.00 $0.00 -$17.17
Vendor Rebates $593.59 $0.00 $392.19 $478.19 $0.00 $0.00 $1,463.97
Total Non-Operating Income/Expenses -$25,031.07 -$41,410.75 -$41,018.56 -$41,434.23 -$41,410.75 -$44,163.25 -$49,687.98 -$134,206.37 -$29,244.07 -$22,868.80 -$22,851.63 -$23,902.92 -$517,230.38
Total Other Income and Expense -$25,031.07 -$41,675.75 -$41,084.56 -$41,434.23 -$41,410.75 -$44,163.25 -$49,687.98 -$134,206.37 -$29,244.07 -$22,868.80 -$22,851.63 -$23,902.92 -$517,561.38
Net Income / (Loss) before Tax -$50,388.41 -$80,157.33 -$91,012.31 -$98,145.15 -$61,764.66 -$80,568.69 -$118,397.49 -$222,114.52 -$129,823.75 -$124,883.13 -$101,612.52 $6,606.73 -$1,152,261.23
Add-Backs
One-time Legal Expenses Related to Acquisition & Licensing $6,392.44 $6,392.44
One-time Professional Fees Related to Prop. Tax Exemption App. $8,277.23 $8,277.23
Other Start-Up Costs $17.17 $17.17
Total $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $8,277.23 $0.00 $6,392.44 $17.17 $14,686.84
Net Income / (Loss) Excluding Transition Costs -$50,388.41 -$80,157.33 -$91,012.31 -$98,145.15 -$61,764.66 -$80,568.69 -$105,714.01 -$213,634.55 -$117,437.61 -$113,854.92 -$92,829.59 $20,865.52 -$1,084,641.71
© 2020 CBRE, Inc.

© 2020 CBRE, Inc.

© 2020 CBRE, Inc.

© 2020 CBRE, Inc.

© 2020 CBRE, Inc.

© 2020 CBRE, Inc.

© 2020 CBRE, Inc.

© 2020 CBRE, Inc.

© 2020 CBRE, Inc.

© 2020 CBRE, Inc.

© 2020 CBRE, Inc.

© 2020 CBRE, Inc.

© 2020 CBRE, Inc.

© 2020 CBRE, Inc.

© 2020 CBRE, Inc.

© 2020 CBRE, Inc.

© 2020 CBRE, Inc.

© 2020 CBRE, Inc.

© 2020 CBRE, Inc.

© 2020 CBRE, Inc.

© 2020 CBRE, Inc.

© 2020 CBRE, Inc.

© 2020 CBRE, Inc.

© 2020 CBRE, Inc.

© 2020 CBRE, Inc.

© 2020 CBRE, Inc.

© 2020 CBRE, Inc.

© 2020 CBRE, Inc.

© 2020 CBRE, Inc.

© 2020 CBRE, Inc.

© 2020 CBRE, Inc.

© 2020 CBRE, Inc.

Imagine Senior Living CAP-X Request
Quantity Each Total
Paint General Areas 1 50,000$ 50,000$
Lighting Package all 3 building 1 60,000$ 60,000$
Parking Lot pot holes 4 2,000$ 8,000$
Parking Lot restriped 1 15,000$ 15,000$
P-Tac Units 20 800$ 16,000$
Apartment and Office Door Handles 110 25$ 2,750$
Apartment Rent Ready 10 1,500$ 15,000$
Apartment Flooring 20 1,500$ 30,000$
Dumpster fence repair paint 3 500$ 1,500$
Signage change all signs 1 7,500$ 7,500$
Carpet repair entry way 1 5,000$ 5,000$
Landscaping 1 25,000$ 25,000$
Apartment Refrigerators 15 150$ 2,250$
Apartment Microwaves 15 65$ 975$
Computers 16 750$ 12,000$
Phone system (internet) 2 5,000$ 10,000$
Camera System 3 3,000$ 9,000$
Steam Table 1 4,500$ 4,500$
Commercial microwave 2 800$ 1,600$
Washing Machine 1 800$ 800$
Print Website & On Line Marketing 1 20,000$ 20,000$
Contingency 53,438$
Total 300,313$
© 2020 CBRE, Inc.

Addenda

ADDENDUM C
Legal Description
© 2020 CBRE, Inc.

© 2020 CBRE, Inc.

Addenda

ADDENDUM D
Senior Life Report
© 2020 CBRE, Inc.

��������� ���
��
������������������� ������� ������ !������”#$�%&’%( )*%+, &-(. ,/*+0, &-0. /+*1/1 &-+.”#$�&2’&% )*)0/ &-0. ,/*/%+ &-1. /1*02( &-&.”#$�&&’&( )*1,% 1-/. ,)*,1% 1-2. /0*&2& &-(.”#$�12’1% )*))& &-+. ,/*//1 &-1. /1*+01 &-&.”#$�1&’1( /*0%+ %-(. ,2*+,/ %-(. /)*&/) %-0.”#$�+2’+% /*/++ )-(. (*21, %-,. ,(*%2, %-2.”#$�+&’+( ,*+22 /-(. 1*%01 )-2. ,)*+%/ /-0.”#$�02’0% ,*/&& /-,. %*1,2 /-,. (*&&) /-2.”#$�0&�345�675$8 ,*&,1 /-1. 1*,/( /-0. ,/*2/& /-&./2/2�9$5:34�”#$ )1-( )1-0 )1-2;$<37$=�"#$�%&'%( ,*+)1 &-0. 1*)+1 &-+. ,)*+/) &-1.;$<37$=�"#$�&2'&% ,*1(& &-+. 1*/,/ &-&. ,)*%00 &-&.;$<37$=�"#$�&&'&( ,*0,+ 1-,. 1*+&1 1-2. ,%*+,/ 1-2.;$<37$=�"#$�12'1% ,*+1& &-(. 1*%0% &-0. ,%*,2( &-0.;$<37$=�"#$�1&'1( ,*&/+ &-,. &*0+/ &-/. ,/*+(1 &-/.;$<37$=�"#$�+2'+% ,*)/( %-%. &*,() %-1. ,,*2%2 %-&.;$<37$=�"#$�+&'+( (1( )-/. )*10) )-). +*++( )-/.;$<37$=�"#$�02'0% +&1 /-&. /*0,+ /-&. &*++( /-%.;$<37$=�"#$�0&> (() )-). %*,21 )-+. +*0(0 )-/./2/2�9$5:34�;$<37$�"#$ )0-) )0-& )+-1937$=�"#$�%&'%( ,*+)& 1-,. 1*%21 1-2. ,)*(2) &-0.937$=�"#$�&2'&% ,*10+ &-(. 1*2)1 &-1. ,)*)/, &-&.937$=�"#$�&&'&( ,*+(+ 1-). 1*%20 1-2. ,)*+() &-+.937$=�"#$�12'1% ,*&+2 &-&. &*+%/ &-). ,/*1+0 &-).937$=�"#$�1&'1( ,*)/, %-1. %*0)( %-&. ,2*+/0 %-&.937$=�"#$�+2'+% (%0 )-). )*010 )-1. 0*)1, )-&.937$=�"#$�+&'+( +), /-1. /*02% /-1. &*(1) /-&.937$=�"#$�02'0% %(( ,-+. ,*+() ,-+. )*++% ,-1.937$=�"#$�0&> &/) ,-0. /*2// ,-(. %*,/1 ,-+./2/2�9$5:34�937$�”#$ )&-& )&-) )%-1
?@A@A�BCDEF�GHIJ�IKLMNOPQIMK�HPJ�RSSK�MRQPIKST�LNMO�JMUNVSJ�RSWISXST�NSWIPRWSF�YS�HPXS�KMQ�XSNILIST�IQ�PKT�OPZS�KM�[UPNPKQSS\�]PNNPKQ̂�MN�NS_NSJSKQPQIMK�PRMUQ�IQF�̀K̂�_NMaSVQIMKJ\�M_IKIMKJ\�PJJUO_QIMKJMN�SJQIOPQSJ�UJST�PNS�LMN�SbPO_WS�MKŴ�PKT�TM�KMQ�NS_NSJSKQ�QHS�VUNNSKQ�MN�LUQUNS�_SNLMNOPKVS�ML�QHS�_NM_SNQ̂F�cMU�PKT�̂MUN�PTXIJMNJ�JHMUWT�VMKTUVQ�P�VPNSLUW\�IKTS_SKTSKQ�IKXSJQI[PQIMK�ML�QHS�_NM_SNQ̂�QMTSQSNOIKS�QM�̂MUN�JPQIJLPVQIMK�QHS�JUIQPRIWIQ̂�ML�QHS�_NM_SNQ̂�LMN�̂MUN�KSSTJF�dMUNVSe�EJNI�fP[S�g�fNMaSVQhiejklmlg
© 2020 CBRE, Inc.

��������� ���
��
������������������� ������� ������ !������”#$�%&’%( )*%%) &+,- ./*0(% &+0- /1*1,. &+&-“#$�&2’&% )*)., &+0- ./*)1. &+&- /0*(,/ &+%-“#$�&&’&( )*/&/ &+&- ..*()2 &+)- /0*/0, &+/-“#$�02’0% )*)0( &+1- ./*0%/ &+0- /1*1%( &+&-“#$�0&’0( )*.&, &+)- ..*&() &+/- /&*)(/ &+.-“#$�12’1% /*&1. %+)- .2*.2) %+&- /.*(), %+%-“#$�1&’1( /*./. )+0- ,*/%( )+1- .1*1)/ )+&-“#$�,2′,% .*)10 /+)- &*%&( /+%- ..*0/( /+)-,&�345�675$8 .*&%) /+0- 0*)1/ /+,- ./*1.2 /+&-/2/&�9$5:34�”#$ )1+0 )1+& )0+,;$<37$=�"#$�%&'%( .*1// &+1- 0*)02 &+&- .)*021 &+%-;$<37$=�"#$�&2'&% .*01/ &+&- 0*/0, &+%- .)*&12 &+)-;$<37$=�"#$�&&'&( .*0&) &+&- 0*./( &+)- .)*%). &+)-;$<37$=�"#$�02'0% .*0(, &+0- 0*&&0 &+1- .%*%.& &+1-;$<37$=�"#$�0&'0( .*0(& &+0- 0*/,, &+&- .)*0/. &+%-;$<37$=�"#$�12'1% .*%/% %+1- &*0(/ %+(- ./*)2, %+,-;$<37$=�"#$�1&'1( .*/&. %+.- %*1,. %+/- .2*/,( %+2-;$<37$=�"#$�,2',% 1(, /+0- )*/%. /+,- 0*,(. /+1-;$<37$=�"#$�,&> ((/ )+)- %*/). )+1- ,*/%1 )+/-/2/&�9$5:34�;$<37$�"#$ )(+2 )(+/ ),+%%(+2- %,+,- %(+%-937$=�"#$�%&'%( .*1/2 &+(- 0*))% &+,- .%*.1% &+1-937$=�"#$�&2'&% .*0%0 &+1- 0*.2) &+0- .)*%./ &+%-937$=�"#$�&&'&( .*&(( &+&- &*,22 &+)- ./*,)1 &+/-937$=�"#$�02'0% .*01. &+1- 0*2,0 &+&- .)*))& &+%-937$=�"#$�0&'0( .*%0) &+2- &*)2& %+,- ..*11/ %+1-937$=�"#$�12'1% .*.%1 )+(- %*%./ %+2- (*0)2 )+(-937$=�"#$�1&'1( ,12 )+2- )*%0, )+/- 1*%%) )+2-937$=�"#$�,2',% &1( /+2- /*/., /+2- %*1), .+(-937$=�"#$�,&> &&/ .+(- /*.%/ /+2- %*%0) .+,-/2/&�9$5:34�937$�”#$ )0+) )0+2 )&+%
?@A@A�BCDEF�GHIJ�IKLMNOPQIMK�HPJ�RSSK�MRQPIKST�LNMO�JMUNVSJ�RSWISXST�NSWIPRWSF�YS�HPXS�KMQ�XSNILIST�IQ�PKT�OPZS�KM�[UPNPKQSS\�]PNNPKQ̂�MN�NS_NSJSKQPQIMK�PRMUQ�IQF�̀K̂�_NMaSVQIMKJ\�M_IKIMKJ\�PJJUO_QIMKJMN�SJQIOPQSJ�UJST�PNS�LMN�SbPO_WS�MKŴ�PKT�TM�KMQ�NS_NSJSKQ�QHS�VUNNSKQ�MN�LUQUNS�_SNLMNOPKVS�ML�QHS�_NM_SNQ̂F�cMU�PKT�̂MUN�PTXIJMNJ�JHMUWT�VMKTUVQ�P�VPNSLUW\�IKTS_SKTSKQ�IKXSJQI[PQIMK�ML�QHS�_NM_SNQ̂�QMTSQSNOIKS�QM�̂MUN�JPQIJLPVQIMK�QHS�JUIQPRIWIQ̂�ML�QHS�_NM_SNQ̂�LMN�̂MUN�KSSTJF�dMUNVSe�EJNI�fP[S�@�fNMaSVQgheijklkm
© 2020 CBRE, Inc.

��������� ���
��
������������������� ������� ������ !������”#$�%&’%( %)*+& ,-*. /%)00/ 1-,. 0*),%/ 1-,.”#$�&*’&% 0)2,, 1-,. /0)(&2 1-1. +(),%, 1-&.”#$�&&’&( 0)+(( &-,. /+)000 &-2. +1)2*( &-2.”#$�1*’1% +),*& %-,. /*)&01 %-(. ++)((( &-*.”#$�1&’1( +)*%0 0-&. ,),0& 0-1. /1)%%% 0-1.”#$�,*’,% /)1,2 +-(. 1)*+0 +-2. /+)&// +-,.”#$�,&’,( /)&1& +-,. &)+22 +-&. /*)(/( +-%.”#$�2*’2% /)%/% +-&. %),2% +-+. ()&*( +-/.2&�345�675$8 /)0*1 +-0. &)+,+ +-&. /*)*++ +-+.+*/*�9$5:34�”#$ 0&-& 0&-+ 0%-&;$<37$=�"#$�%&'%( +)**, 1-2. ,)+/2 1-1. /&)%+% 1-1.;$<37$=�"#$�&*'&% /)(2& 1-,. ,)/,/ 1-&. /&)+0& 1-&.;$<37$=�"#$�&&'&( /),&+ &-(. 1)&,2 1-*. /%)/&% 1-/.;$<37$=�"#$�1*'1% /)&/* &-/. &),%, &-+. /+)012 &-0.;$<37$=�"#$�1&'1( /)/*( 0-,. %)+00 0-(. 2)2%( 0-2.;$<37$=�"#$�,*',% ((, 0-%. 0)&+* 0-+. ,)/1% 0-/.;$<37$=�"#$�,&',( (0% 0-/. 0)/*/ +-2. 1)0,% +-,.;$<37$=�"#$�2*'2% (/* 0-/. 0)*&0 +-2. &)(21 +-1.;$<37$=�"#$�2&> 22& 0-*. 0)101 0-0. 1)2** +-(.+*/*�9$5:34�;$<37$�"#$ 0,-+ 01-( 01-/937$=�"#$�%&'%( +)*/, ,-+. ,)//% 1-(. /&)0/, 1-,.937$=�"#$�&*'&% /)2(+ 1-2. 1),2, 1-1. /%)&/+ 1-%.937$=�"#$�&&'&( /)&%, &-&. &),&& &-1. /+)1&& &-1.937$=�"#$�1*'1% /)/(% %-0. %),2( %-1. /*)10/ %-,.937$=�"#$�1&'1( (0% 0-0. 0)&*+ 0-%. ,)&(& 0-0.937$=�"#$�,*',% 12/ +-%. +)&*0 +-%. &)0%, +-%.937$=�"#$�,&',( 10/ +-0. +)/2, +-/. %)&%% +-*.937$=�"#$�2*'2% &*% /-2. /),0/ /-,. 0)&+0 /-1.937$=�"#$�2&> %+/ /-&. /)101 /-1. 0)+++ /-%.+*/*�9$5:34�937$�”#$ 00-( 00-, 00-*
?@A@A�BCDEF�GHIJ�IKLMNOPQIMK�HPJ�RSSK�MRQPIKST�LNMO�JMUNVSJ�RSWISXST�NSWIPRWSF�YS�HPXS�KMQ�XSNILIST�IQ�PKT�OPZS�KM�[UPNPKQSS\�]PNNPKQ̂�MN�NS_NSJSKQPQIMK�PRMUQ�IQF�̀K̂�_NMaSVQIMKJ\�M_IKIMKJ\�PJJUO_QIMKJMN�SJQIOPQSJ�UJST�PNS�LMN�SbPO_WS�MKŴ�PKT�TM�KMQ�NS_NSJSKQ�QHS�VUNNSKQ�MN�LUQUNS�_SNLMNOPKVS�ML�QHS�_NM_SNQ̂F�cMU�PKT�̂MUN�PTXIJMNJ�JHMUWT�VMKTUVQ�P�VPNSLUW\�IKTS_SKTSKQ�IKXSJQI[PQIMK�ML�QHS�_NM_SNQ̂�QMTSQSNOIKS�QM�̂MUN�JPQIJLPVQIMK�QHS�JUIQPRIWIQ̂�ML�QHS�_NM_SNQ̂�LMN�̂MUN�KSSTJF�dMUNVSe�EJNI�fP[S�g�fNMaSVQhiejgklkm
© 2020 CBRE, Inc.

��������� ���
��
������������������� ������� ������ !�������”�”�#$�%&’��()*��+)�,�-./)0� 1234252 1!34″6 1!74!�7�”�2�#$�%&’��()*��+)�,�-./)0� 1!54725 17�4″26 1754287�”�”���,�&.�()*��+)�,�-./)0� 1 �46 7 1 4″”! 1 4 6″�”�2���,�&.�()*��+)�,�-./)0� 1 435! 1 243!6 1 !4 6 �”�”�9�%�:&;�<&�-./)0� 1�54626 1�3488 1�747"��"�2�9�%�:&;�<&�-./)0� 1�84582 1�6466 1�64836�"�"=�"�2�#..*&����,�&.�()*��+)�,�-./)0��>%)?<+�@&<� "A3!B "A38B "A36B�"�"=�"�2�#..*&��9�%�:&;�<&�-./)0��>%)?<+�@&<� 5A"2B 5A52B 5A56B��C.,�%�1524""" 842865!A"B 5 47"85!A�B 8842 257A"B1524"""=1� 4666 �47�"5�A8B 5"43 5�A"B ��4 �55A B1�24"""=18 4666 �4!�!55A6B 5"485355A B �542 5"A6B1824"""=1 64666 842"752A6B 5 4"�652A2B �6463652A�B12"4"""=17 4666 4� 256A8B 5242�357A5B 8 4" 357A8B1724"""=1664666 �42�755A2B 642�65"A2B �"46 "5"A!B15""4"""=15 64666 543 2 3A B 348!" 6A�B 534!67 6A2B152"4"""=15664666 2 7 �A2B 845! 8A2B 748�" 8A7B1�""4"""�&.,�D$�% 2"5 �A8B 4�"! A!B 347 6 A B��C.,�%�1524""" 84 5!52A8B 5 4 !652A!B 8848585!A8B1524"""=1� 4666 �426755A!B 5"4 3 55A8B �546! 5"A7B1�24"""=18 4666 �4!"555A!B 5"48!�55A�B �5465"5"A7B1824"""=1 64666 8428"52A3B 5 4� 752A8B 8"436352A5B12"4"""=17 4666 4 !2�"A"B 5!42!!57A3B 8!477"57A6B1724"""=1664666 �47"75�A5B 5"485�55A5B ��46 755A�B15""4"""=15 64666 546!! 3A3B 34325 6A2B �"4��6 6A6B152"4"""=15664666 23 �A!B 848 8 8A!B 7437� 8A3B1�""4"""�&.,�D$�% 7 �A5B 48�8 A7B 64"�5 A B EFGFG�HIJKL�MNOP�OQRSTUVWOSQ�NVP�XYYQ�SXWVOQYZ�RTSU�PS[T\YP�XY]OŶYZ�TY]OVX]YL�_Y�NV̂Y�QSW�̂YTOROYZ�OW�VQZ�UV̀Y�QS�a[VTVQWYYb�cVTTVQWd�ST�TYeTYPYQWVWOSQ�VXS[W�OWL�fQd�eTSgY\WOSQPb�SeOQOSQPb�VPP[UeWOSQPST�YPWOUVWYP�[PYZ�VTY�RST�YhVUe]Y�SQ]d�VQZ�ZS�QSW�TYeTYPYQW�WNY�\[TTYQW�ST�R[W[TY�eYTRSTUVQ\Y�SR�WNY�eTSeYTWdL�iS[�VQZ�dS[T�VẐOPSTP�PNS[]Z�\SQZ[\W�V�\VTYR[]b�OQZYeYQZYQW�OQ̂YPWOaVWOSQ�SR�WNY�eTSeYTWd�WSZYWYTUOQY�WS�dS[T�PVWOPRV\WOSQ�WNY�P[OWVXO]OWd�SR�WNY�eTSeYTWd�RST�dS[T�QYYZPL�jS[T\Yk�KPTO�lVaY�m�lTSgY\Wnokpqrsrt © 2020 CBRE, Inc. ��������� ��� �� ��������������������� ������� ������ !������"#$�%&'&%�()*$+�,-&./// &-0-%1/2 -.034-51%2 %.5-4-%1-2"#$�%&'&%�,-&.///',3%.000 34- 61/2 -./&6 61%2 3.-&6 61-2"#$�%&'&%�,3&.///',5%.000 5%5 0132 -.535 0132 3.7&0 01%2"#$�%&'&%�,5&.///',%0.000 &//-51&2 -.707-5132 5.05&-3102"#$�%&'&%�,&/.///',6%.000 74535132 3.6&&-0132 &.4%/-71&2"#$�%&'&%�,6&.///',00.000 &&/-%172 -.653-31-2 5.&4/--162"#$�%&'&%�,-//.///',-%0.000 %57--172 -.670-31%2 5.00--51-2"#$�%&'&%�,-&/.///',-00.000 -55 5142 6%4 &132 -.65- &162"#$�%&'&%�,3//.///�8)*�9:$+ -/7 3102 -.-&- 71/2 3.555 61423/3/�;$*<8)�=>?@$A>B*�C)D>E$F�==+�%&’&% ,&%.6%5 ,&4.6%7 ,&4.6/53/3/�”:$+8#$�=>?@$A>B*�C)D>E$F�==+�%&’&% ,47.73- ,76.536 ,74.5-6��”#$�&&’4%�()*$+�,-&./// 46–4102 3.&%0-4102 &.606-6172″#$�&&’4%�,-&.///’,3%.000 576 0162 -.%4/ 0162 5.–7 0142″#$�&&’4%�,3&.///’,5%.000 5&5 7102 -.546 01/2 3.0%& 01/2″#$�&&’4%�,5&.///’,%0.000 &4%-%132 -.07/-51-2 %.-5–3162″#$�&&’4%�,&/.///’,6%.000 0-7351-2 3.7/–71&2 &.44–6152″#$�&&’4%�,6&.///’,00.000 %60-31-2 -.475–1-2 5.&66–1/2″#$�&&’4%�,-//.///’,-%0.000 54/ 01-2 -.4-5-/162 5.6//–152″#$�&&’4%�,-&/.///’,-00.000 -3% 51-2 &6/ 5172 -.550 %1-2″#$�&&’4%�,3//.///�8)*�9:$+ –6 3102 -.-/7 6152 3.560 61523/3/�;$*<8)�=>?@$A>B*�C)D>E$F�==+�&&’4% ,&/.-0- ,&-.3&& ,&/.00%3/3/�”:$+8#$�=>?@$A>B*�C)D>E$F�==+�&&’4% ,45.676 ,7/.5&- ,7/.3&/��”#$�4&’6%�()*$+�,-&./// %57-5172 -.04–&172 %.&%7-4102″#$�4&’6%�,-&.///’,3%.000 5&0–1%2 -.&37-3152 5.565-31&2″#$�4&’6%�,3&.///’,5%.000 %55-5162 -.%%4–142 3.0/%-/172″#$�4&’6%�,5&.///’,%0.000 407331-2 3.-63-61&2 %.%76-4162″#$�4&’6%�,&/.///’,6%.000 &74-71&2 3.-6/-61%2 %.4-4-6132″#$�4&’6%�,6&.///’,00.000 5-6-/1/2 -.353 0102 3.6%6-/132″#$�4&’6%�,-//.///’,-%0.000 -7% &172 -./34 7132 3.37- 71&2″#$�4&’6%�,-&/.///’,-00.000 6& 31%2 564 51/2 75- 51-2″#$�4&’6%�,3//.///�8)*�9:$+ 6& 31%2 &5& %152 -.-/0 %1-23/3/�;$*<8)�=>?@$A>B*�C)D>E$F�==+�4&’6% ,%-./74 ,%3.4/5 ,%3.%003/3/�”:$+8#$�=>?@$A>B*�C)D>E$F�==+�4&’6% ,&4.0&& ,4&.650 ,4%.006
GHIHI�JKLMN�OPQR�QSTUVWXYQUS�PXR�Z[[S�UZYXQS[\�TVUW�RU]V̂[R�Z[_Q[̀[\�V[_QXZ_[N�a[�PX̀[�SUY�̀[VQTQ[\�QY�XS\�WXb[�SU�c]XVXSY[[d�eXVVXSYf�UV�V[gV[R[SYXYQUS�XZU]Y�QYN�hSf�gVUi[̂YQUSRd�UgQSQUSRd�XRR]WgYQUSRUV�[RYQWXY[R�]R[\�XV[�TUV�[jXWg_[�US_f�XS\�\U�SUY�V[gV[R[SY�YP[�̂]VV[SY�UV�T]Y]V[�g[VTUVWXŜ[�UT�YP[�gVUg[VYfN�kU]�XS\�fU]V�X\̀QRUVR�RPU]_\�̂US\]̂Y�X�̂XV[T]_d�QS\[g[S\[SY�QS̀[RYQcXYQUS�UT�YP[�gVUg[VYf�YU\[Y[VWQS[�YU�fU]V�RXYQRTX̂YQUS�YP[�R]QYXZQ_QYf�UT�YP[�gVUg[VYf�TUV�fU]V�S[[\RN�lU]V̂[m�MRVQ�nXc[�o�nVUi[̂Ypqmrstutv
© 2020 CBRE, Inc.

��������� ���
��
��������������������� ������� ������ !������”#$�%&’�()*$+�,-&./// &-0-1203 4./5&-02%3 6.0-/4-2-3″#$�%&’�,-&.///7,46.888 1%54-283 4.-/0-8263 6.&-1-8203″#$�%&’�,4&.///7,56.888 &-%-1203 -.6%5-52&3 4.108–203″#$�%&’�,5&.///7,68.888 604-&2%3 -.%8/-12&3 5.6/–6283″#$�%&’�,&/.///7,%6.888 5%0-4253 -.688-5203 5.581-6283″#$�%&’�,%&.///7,88.888 -%0 &203 %/5 12&3 -.&1% 1283″#$�%&’�,-//.///7,-68.888 -1- &243 160 12/3 -.55/ &203″#$�%&’�,-&/.///7,-88.888 80 5243 5// 4203 &-& 4253″#$�%&’�,4//.///�9)*�:;$+ %/ 4253 54& 52/3 &6& 42634/4/�<$*=9)�>?@A$B?C*�D)E?F$G�>>+�%&’ ,5/.86/ ,55.618 ,54.–84/4/�”;$+9#$�>?@A$B?C*�D)E?F$G�>>+�%&’ ,&/.6-1 ,&6.-5/ ,&-./1%��”#$�6&7&6�()*$+�,-&./// 6%5-52-3 -.%8–4213 6.//1-5243″#$�6&7&6�,-&.///7,46.888 458 1213 81% 1203 -.804 12&3″#$�6&7&6�,4&.///7,56.888 5-4 0213 -.465 02%3 4.%4% 82/3″#$�6&7&6�,5&.///7,68.888 6%4-52-3 -.051-4283 5.0%/-42%3″#$�6&7&6�,&/.///7,%6.888 0&545213 4.%%–82&3 &.%-6-0203″#$�6&7&6�,%&.///7,88.888 &%5-&283 -.04–4203 5.%0&-42&3″#$�6&7&6�,-//.///7,-68.888 61/-42%3 -.010-52-3 6.-%0-5203″#$�6&7&6�,-&/.///7,-88.888 -55 52%3 %&/ &253 -.%&1 &203″#$�6&7&6�,4//.///�9)*�:;$+ -/- 4203 -.-%& 0253 4.5%0 %2034/4&�<$*=9)�>?@A$B?C*�D)E?F$G�>>+�6&7&6 ,&1.10/ ,&8./14 ,&8./6&4/4&�”;$+9#$�>?@A$B?C*�D)E?F$G�>>+�6&7&6 ,%4.8&1 ,85.445 ,8-.000��”#$�&&716�()*$+�,-&./// &05-&213 4.416-&2%3 &.465-1213″#$�&&716�,-&.///7,46.888 555 0283 -.5/- 82/3 4.0/0 0283″#$�&&716�,4&.///7,56.888 541 02%3 -.40/ 0283 4.0-6 0283″#$�&&716�,5&.///7,68.888 &/0-5213 -.060-4203 5.8&4-42&3″#$�&&716�,&/.///7,%6.888 8/-46243 4.%8–8253 &.%-5-02-3″#$�&&716�,%&.///7,88.888 604-4283 -.%-1–283 5.165–2&3″#$�&&716�,-//.///7,-68.888 511 8203 -.1-6–243 5.%5—203″#$�&&716�,-&/.///7,-88.888 -54 52&3 &8/ 62-3 -.58/ 6263″#$�&&716�,4//.///�9)*�:;$+ -// 42%3 -./66 %243 4.4%/ %2434/4&�<$*=9)�>?@A$B?C*�D)E?F$G�>>+�&&716 ,&4./60 ,&5.548 ,&4.8184/4&�”;$+9#$�>?@A$B?C*�D)E?F$G�>>+�&&716 ,1%.%58 ,0&./46 ,06.%&0
HIJIJ�KLMNO�PQRS�RTUVWXYZRVT�QYS�[\\T�V[ZYRT\]�UWVX�SV̂W_\S�[\̀R\a\]�W\̀RY[̀\O�b\�QYa\�TVZ�a\WRUR\]�RZ�YT]�XYc\�TV�d̂YWYTZ\\e�fYWWYTZg�VW�W\hW\S\TZYZRVT�Y[V̂Z�RZO�iTg�hWVj\_ZRVTSe�VhRTRVTSe�YSŜXhZRVTSVW�\SZRXYZ\S�̂S\]�YW\�UVW�\kYXh̀\�VT̀g�YT]�]V�TVZ�W\hW\S\TZ�ZQ\�_̂WW\TZ�VW�ÛẐW\�h\WUVWXYT_\�VU�ZQ\�hWVh\WZgO�lV̂�YT]�gV̂W�Y]aRSVWS�SQV̂]̀�_VT]̂_Z�Y�_YW\Û̀e�RT]\h\T]\TZ�RTa\SZRdYZRVT�VU�ZQ\�hWVh\WZg�ZV]\Z\WXRT\�ZV�gV̂W�SYZRSUY_ZRVT�ZQ\�ŜRZY[R̀RZg�VU�ZQ\�hWVh\WZg�UVW�gV̂W�T\\]SO�mV̂W_\n�NSWR�oYd\�p�oWVj\_Zqrnpstutv
© 2020 CBRE, Inc.

��������� ���
��
��������������������� ������� ������ !������”#$�%&'()�*+,$-�./&0111 )23/45%6 401/3/&516 )0(21/%546″#$�%&'()�./&0111′.4)0333 2%1/15)6 /0&21//5)6 20))%//576″#$�%&'()�.4&0111′.2)0333 )%1/2546 /0&2%//5)6 20//3/15(6″#$�%&'()�.2&0111′.)30333 (&%4/576 4043)/(5/6 )0(3(/%5)6″#$�%&'()�.&10111′.()0333 (1/41546 40&14/75%6 &043(/75/6″#$�%&'()�.(&0111′.330333 2(4/15(6 /023)/15)6 201(7/15&6″#$�%&'()�./110111′./)30333 4/) %546 /0/23 75&6 40&7( 7536″#$�%&'()�./&10111′./330333 7% 45&6 )17 2516 312 25/6″#$�%&'()�.4110111�8+,�9:$- 7% 45&6 %/7 )5%6 /0473 )5)6414&�;$,<8+�=>?@$A>B,�C+D>E$F�==-�%&'() .)201(3 .))0&74 .))0474414&�”:$-8#$�=>?@$A>B,�C+D>E$F�==-�%&'() .%/02)( .(10&/3 .%30%4)��”#$�(&G�*+,$-�./&0111 &(&/%536 402%3/7576 &0%%%4/5/6″#$�(&G�./&0111′.4)0333 (1(41576 40434/7546 )03%4/75&6″#$�(&G�.4&0111′.2)0333 &)3/%546 /0%%%/2546 20/2)//5(6″#$�(&G�.2&0111′.)30333 &24/&5(6 4012%/%546 2034(/)5%6″#$�(&G�.&10111′.()0333 )2)/4576 /0(3&/)526 )0/72/&5%6″#$�(&G�.(&0111′.330333 4/2 %526 7%% %536 /037( (5)6″#$�(&G�./110111′./)30333 /3& &5(6 712 %5)6 /0(1/ %526″#$�(&G�./&10111′./330333 //& 25)6 2%2 4536 %)2 45)6″#$�(&G�.4110111�8+,�9:$- (7 4526 )12 2546 %7% 45%6414&�;$,<8+�=>?@$A>B,�C+D>E$F�==-�(&G .2/03%7 .2)0(&7 .220(/1414&�”:$-8#$�=>?@$A>B,�C+D>E$F�==-�(&G .&20%)4 .&70/47 .&)0327
HIJIJ�KLMNO�PQRS�RTUVWXYZRVT�QYS�[\\T�V[ZYRT\]�UWVX�SV̂W_\S�[\̀R\a\]�W\̀RY[̀\O�b\�QYa\�TVZ�a\WRUR\]�RZ�YT]�XYc\�TV�d̂YWYTZ\\e�fYWWYTZg�VW�W\hW\S\TZYZRVT�Y[V̂Z�RZO�iTg�hWVj\_ZRVTSe�VhRTRVTSe�YSŜXhZRVTSVW�\SZRXYZ\S�̂S\]�YW\�UVW�\kYXh̀\�VT̀g�YT]�]V�TVZ�W\hW\S\TZ�ZQ\�_̂WW\TZ�VW�ÛẐW\�h\WUVWXYT_\�VU�ZQ\�hWVh\WZgO�lV̂�YT]�gV̂W�Y]aRSVWS�SQV̂]̀�_VT]̂_Z�Y�_YW\Û̀e�RT]\h\T]\TZ�RTa\SZRdYZRVT�VU�ZQ\�hWVh\WZg�ZV]\Z\WXRT\�ZV�gV̂W�SYZRSUY_ZRVT�ZQ\�ŜRZY[R̀RZg�VU�ZQ\�hWVh\WZg�UVW�gV̂W�T\\]SO�mV̂W_\n�NSWR�oYd\�p�oWVj\_Zqrnstpupv
© 2020 CBRE, Inc.

��������� ���
��
��������������������� ������� ������ !������”#$%&�'()*))) +,-,./0 1+1,.20 2*,33(.,0′()*)))4’11*111 +*-/),5.10 3*(+2-3./0 -+*25)-3.20′-))*)))4′-21*111 ,*/3/,(.-0 3*+12-3.20 -,*)/(-2.50′-()*)))4′-11*111 -*552-(.30 3*33)-5.-0 -+*35+-3.30′,))*)))4′,21*111 -*)221.,0 2*)(5-).20 1*-(,–.-0′,()*)))4′,11*111 /+15.20 +*221/.10 /*())-).+0’+))*)))4’+11*111 32)(.30 2*+-/–.-0 1*(,,–.30’2))*)))4’211*111 +2/+.-0 -*1+1(.)0 +*5212.30′())*)))4’521*111 ,)(-./0 ,*3)33.50 2*+,1(.+0’5()*)))4’111*111 -,,-.-0 -*-3(+.)0 -*521,.-0′-*)))*)))4′-*211*111 -().-0 2+/-.-0 12,-.-0′-*())*)))4′-*111*111 +,).+0 ,22).30 2-().(0′,*)))*)))�6#$�78%& -/).,0 -12).(0 2-5).(0,),)�9%$:6#�;6<=%�>?�7@#%&�7AA.�B>=C:#D�”#:EC ‘-+/*+/1 ‘-1,*)(+ ‘-1-*+5,,),)�F8%&6D%�;6<=%�>?�7@#%&�7AA.�B>=C:#D�”#:EC ‘-/(*-() ‘,53*1,+ ‘,3-*(-5�� (-./0 2,./0 2-.,0″#$%&�'()*))) ,3+,.+0 5,3-./0 +*32/2.+0′()*)))4’11*111 ,*5-,,+.(0 (*+-+-+.20 –*,/+-+.20′-))*)))4′-21*111 ,*3+3,,./0 (*5)2-2.+0 -)*/31-,.10′-()*)))4′-11*111 -*3(2-2.+0 3*)2,-(.,0 -,*(22-2.10′,))*)))4′,21*111 -*-+11.10 2*,)3-).30 1*()1–.+0′,()*)))4′,11*111 -*–11.50 2*-(2-).20 -)*)53–.10’+))*)))4’+11*111 /(-5.20 (*(+,-+.10 –*1,(-2.-0’2))*)))4’211*111 (-+2.20 ,*3++3.30 (*)2+3.)0′())*)))4’521*111 +/5+.20 +*,)+/.-0 (*2533.(0’5()*)))4’111*111 ,)5-./0 -*,/3+.,0 -*/1+,.,0′-*)))*)))4′-*211*111 ,5).,0 ()2-.+0 -*-3)-.20′-*())*)))4′-*111*111 +1).+0 +-+)./0 (,5).30’,*)))*)))�6#$�78%& -/).,0 -13).(0 2(1).(0,),(�9%$:6#�;6<=%�>?�7@#%&�7AA.�B>=C:#D�”#:EC ‘-((*-/2 ‘,,(*,-2 ‘,,)*+)5,),(�F8%&6D%�;6<=%�>?�7@#%&�7AA.�B>=C:#D�”#:EC ‘,-(*)(3 ‘+)2*11/ ‘,//*,-+��,),)�G&>=H�I=6&E%&C�J>H=<6E:># +() (*+12 -1*-/-,),(�G&>=H�I=6&E%&C�J>H=<6E:># +() (*+12 -1*-/-K#CE:E=E:>#6<�G&>=H�I=6&E%&C 32-/.20 ,*+-(2+.,0 /*25122.,0���F$=&&%AE:>#6< 2 -.,0 2, )./0 2*/5/,(.(0���M=8%#:<%�N6A:<:E:%C ( -.20 ++ ).30 +/ ).,0���O=&C:#D�N6A:<:E:%C (2-(.(0 ,*-352).20 +*2)2-5./0���7EP%&�K#CE:E=E:>#6< ) ).)0 5+ -.20 -3) )./0O>#4K#CE:E=E:>#6<�G&>=H�I=6&E%&C ,/(/-.10 +*)2((3./0 -)*3//((./0���L><<%D%�QE=$%#E�B>=C:#D 5 ,.)0 ,*25,23.-0 2*3)5,2.)0���9:<:E6&R�I=6&E%&C ) ).)0 ) ).)0 +*35,-1.,0���7EP%&�O>#4K#CE:E=E:>#6< ,5/51.10 (5+-).50 ,*2)1-,.30STUTU�VWXYZ�[\]̂�]_̀abcde]a_�\d̂�fgg_�afed]_gh�̀bac�̂aibjĝ�fgk]glgh�bgk]dfkgZ�mg�\dlg�_ae�lgb]̀]gh�]e�d_h�cdng�_a�oidbd_eggp�qdbbd_er�ab�bgsbĝg_ede]a_�dfaie�]eZ�t_r�sbaugje]a_̂p�as]_]a_̂p�d̂ îcse]a_̂ab�ĝe]cdeĝ�îgh�dbg�̀ab�gvdcskg�a_kr�d_h�ha�_ae�bgsbĝg_e�e\g�jibbg_e�ab�̀ieibg�sgb̀abcd_jg�à�e\g�sbasgberZ�wai�d_h�raib�dhl]̂ab̂�̂\aikh�ja_hije�d�jdbg̀ikp�]_hgsg_hg_e�]_lĝe]ode]a_�à�e\g�sbasgber�eahgegbc]_g�ea�raib�̂de]̂̀dje]a_�e\g�̂i]edf]k]er�à�e\g�sbasgber�̀ab�raib�_ggĥZ�xaibjgy�Ŷb]�zdog�{�zbaugje|}y~��{�� © 2020 CBRE, Inc. ��������� ��� �� ������������������� ���� �������� ����������� ������������������� �� ! "#�� $"#$"%�# !��!!��#"����&'('(�)*+,-�./01�02345678042�/71�9::2�498702:;�3546�14<5=:1�9:>0:?:;�5:>079>:-�@:�/7?:�248�?:5030:;�08�72;�67A:�24�B<75728::C�D755728E�45�5:F5:1:2878042�794<8�08-�G2E�F54H:=80421C�4F020421C�711<6F8042145�:180678:1�<1:;�75:�345�:I76F>:�42>E�72;�;4�248�5:F5:1:28�8/:�=<55:28�45�3<8<5:�F:5345672=:�43�8/:�F54F:58E-�J4<�72;�E4<5�7;?01451�1/4<>;�=42;<=8�7�=75:3<>C�02;:F:2;:28�02?:180B78042�43�8/:�F54F:58E�84;:8:5602:�84�E4<5�1780137=8042�8/:�1<08790>08E�43�8/:�F54F:58E�345�E4<5�2::;1-�K4<5=:L�,150�M54H:=8NOLPQRSRT © 2020 CBRE, Inc. Addenda ADDENDUM E Client Contract Information © 2020 CBRE, Inc. total appraisal management & review TAMR Mailing Address: P.O. Box 161926 Austin, Texas 78716-1926 512.402.0029 TotalAMR.com September 21, 2020 Malcolm H. Coleman CBRE Valuation & Advisory Services 250 W. Nottingham Drive, Suite 115 San Antonio, TX 78209 Dear Mr. Coleman: This letter will serve as TAMR’s engagement of your services to perform an appraisal on the following property. The specifics of the engagement, including the agreed upon fee and delivery date are listed below. The appraisal reports must be addressed to the client, but sent to TAMR, to the address shown below. Any questions pertaining to this assignment should be addressed with the client contact first. The appraisal must comply with the most recent edition of the Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice, Title XI of "FIRREA" and the 2010 Interagency Appraisal and Evaluation Guidelines. Failure to comply with any of the above requirements may result in rejection of the appraisal. In addition, payment of the fee is subject to a review of the appraisal for compliance with the above mentioned requirements. Should you experience any delays in the performance of this appraisal please notify us, in writing via e-mail, no less than five days prior to the due date. The appraisal and information gathered in the development of this appraisal are confidential information and should be treated as such. Please note that a $100 per day fine will be imposed for reports not delivered as promised or without prior, one weeks notice of delay. Please make sure the following items are included in every report as indicated: Photographs of the subject property, comparable improved sales and comparable rents Invoice made out to TAMR Aerial photo with the subject property outlined Supporting documents in the Addendum including, as applicable: • Engagement Letter • Contracts • Leases • Costs • Operating Statements and Rent Rolls • Argus Input Assumptions Any sales comparison approach should include an adjustment grid If applicable, a capitalization rate should be derived from two or more sources. Insurable replacement cost Sincerely, Sara Jones Oates Agent for The Bank of San Antonio Total Appraisal Management & Review © 2020 CBRE, Inc. e PROPERTY ADDRESS: 1207 Jackson Keller, San Antonio, TX 78213 GENERAL PROPERTY DESCRIPTION: A 89,140 sq ft assisted living facility, 97 units on 11.76 acres total, 5 acres are excess land. Proposed renovations due to water damage. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Lot 30 Castle Hills City Block 109, Bucker Baptist Benevolence Subdivision, Castle Hills, Bexar County CONTACT PERSON FOR INSPECTION: Sharon Wang (704) 756-5914 sharon_wang@atlantis-china.com INTENDED USE: New loan TYPE REPORT: FKA Self-Contained Insurable Replacement Costs APPRAISAL STATUS: As if Renovated INCLUDE FF&E IN VALUE: Yes FEE: $5,900 DUE DATE: October 1, 2020 Accepted: Dated: ____________________________ ___________________ ADDRESS REPORTS TO INTENDED USER: Daniel Partida Credit Analyst II The Bank of San Antonio 1900 NW Loop 410 San Antonio, TX 78213 210.807.5587 Daniel.partida@thebankofsa .com SEND REPORTS & INVOICE TO: Lesley Morris Total Appraisal Management & Review Lesley@totalamr.com REPORT DELIVERY: 1 PDF to TAMR via email 9/21/2020 © 2020 CBRE, Inc. mailto:Daniel.partida@thebankofsa.com mailto:Daniel.partida@thebankofsa.com mailto:Lesley@totalamr.com Addenda ADDENDUM F Appraiser Qualifications © 2020 CBRE, Inc. Andy Kepchar, MAI Vice President Valuation and Advisory Services, Seniors Housing & Healthcare ̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶ Experience ̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶ Andy Kepchar, MAI is a Vice President for CBRE Valuation & Advisory Services and is based in San Antonio, Texas. With over 15 years of experience in seniors housing appraising, Mr. Kepchar covers the South-Central Region for the Healthcare and Seniors Housing Group. Clients he has served include a broad base of regional and national commercial banks, REITs, property owners, and operating and development companies. Mr. Kepchar also specializes in providing appraisal services for HUD-insured financing under the LEAN Program. He is a national HUD Practice Leader for the CBRE Seniors Housing & Healthcare group. Mr. Kepchar’s experience includes the estimation of values for continuing care retirement communities (CCRCs), surgical centers, rehabilitation centers, long term acute care facilities (LTACs), independent and assisted living facilities, memory care facilities, and skilled nursing facilities. He has also worked with other asset classes including multifamily, office, and retail. Prior to joining CBRE, he worked as a senior consultant for a national seniors housing specialty firm. ̶̶̶̶̶̶ Professional Affiliations / Accreditations ̶̶̶̶̶̶ • Appraisal Institute, Designated Member (MAI) • Certified General Real Estate Appraiser in TX, OK, LA, AR, KS ̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶ Education ̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶ • University of Delaware, B.S.  Majors – Finance and Marketing  Minor - Economics • Appraisal Institute  All courses related to becoming Certified General Appraiser  Advanced Income Capitalization  Advanced Market Analysis and Highest and Best Use  General Appraiser Report Writing and Case Studies  Advanced Concepts and Case Studies  Quantitative Analysis  General Demonstration Report – Capstone Program T + 1 210 253 6005 M +1 717 575 3723 andy.kepchar@cbre.com 200 Concord Plaza Suite 800 San Antonio, TX 78216 • M&T Bank • Capital Funding Group • M&T Realty Capital • Welltower • Dwight Capital • CohnReznick • PNC • Cambridge Realty Capital Companies • Cushman & Wakefield • Cedarbrook Senior Living • Sunrise Senior Living • Silverado Senior Living • BB&T • Sims Mortgage Funding • KeyBank • Southwest Bank • Independence Bank • BBVA Compass • Interbank • Capital One Bank • Southern Bank • Popular Bank Clients Represented © 2020 CBRE, Inc. Douglas E. Oldmixon Commissioner Texas Appraiser Licensing and Certification BoardTexas Appraiser Licensing and Certification BoardTexas Appraiser Licensing and Certification BoardTexas Appraiser Licensing and Certification Board P.O. Box 12188 Austin, Texas 78711-2188 Certified General Real Estate Appraiser Having provided satisfactory evidence of the qualifications required by the Texas Appraiser Licensing and Certification Act, Texas Occupations Code, Chapter 1103, is authorized to use this title, Certified General Real Estate Appraiser. Number: Issued: 1380208 Expires: 01/31/2021 ANDREW S KEPCHAR 200 CONCORD PLAZA STE 800 SAN ANTONIO, TX 78216 Appraiser: 01/30/2019 ANDREW S KEPCHAR TX G You may wish to laminate the pocket identification card to preserve it. Inquiry as to the status of this license may be made to: Texas Appraiser Licensing and Certification Board P.O. Box 12188 Austin, Tx 78711-2188 www.talcb.texas.gov (512) 936-3001 Fax:(512) 936-3899 Douglas E. Oldmixon Commissioner The person named on the reverse is licensed by the Texas Appraiser Licensing and Certification Board. Texas Appraiser Licensing and Certification BoardTexas Appraiser Licensing and Certification BoardTexas Appraiser Licensing and Certification BoardTexas Appraiser Licensing and Certification Board P.O. Box 12188 Austin, Texas 78711-2188 Certified General Real Estate Appraiser Having provided satisfactory evidence of the qualifications required by the Texas Appraiser Licensing and Certification Act, Texas Occupations Code, Chapter 1103, is authorized to use this title, Certified General Real Estate Appraiser. Number#: Issued: Expires: 1380208 01/31/2021 Appraiser: 01/30/2019 ANDREW S KEPCHAR TX G © 2020 CBRE, Inc. MMMal Malcolm Coleman, MAI, MRICS Managing Director, San Antonio ̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶ Experience ̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶ Malcolm Coleman is Managing Director of Valuation and Advisory Services within the South Central Region in the San Antonio office. Mr. Coleman has over thirty years of real estate appraisal and consulting experience throughout the United States and the United Kingdom with primary experience in South and West Texas. Mr. Coleman is a designated Member of the Appraisal Institute (MAI) and Member of the Royal Institution of Chartered Surveyors (MRICS) and is licensed as a Certified General Real Estate Appraiser in the State of Texas. He has also provided expert witness testimony in the Circuit Courts – State of Texas and United States Bankruptcy Courts. As Managing Director, Mr. Coleman leads a valuation and advisory staff in San Antonio that provides exceptional quality appraisal work and client service throughout South and West Texas. He also coordinates all activities for San Antonio including overseeing new business development, client relations and appraisal production quality control. ̶̶̶̶̶̶ Professional Affiliations / Accreditations ̶̶̶̶̶̶ • Appraisal Institute – Designated Member (MAI), Certificate No.431212 • Royal Institution of Chartered Surveyors – Member (MRICS) Certificate No.0088195 • Certified General Real Estate Appraiser, State of Texas, # 1335110 ̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶ Education ̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶ • Aberdeen University, Aberdeen, Scotland, United Kingdom ̶ Bachelor of Land Economics, 1989 T + 210-580-8083 M +210-454-7920 malcolm.coleman@cbre.com 250 W. Nottingham, Suite 115 San Antonio Texas 78209 • Wells Fargo • USAA • Bank of America • Frost Bank • JP Morgan Chase • BBVA • Amegy • GE • Prologis • RERC • Strasburger and Price • Capital One • LNR • Aetna • IBC Bank • Goldman Sachs • Capmark • TXDOT • Rialto • Stancorp • Green Bank • Cole Capital • Walker and Dunlop • Berkeley Point Clients Represented © 2020 CBRE, Inc. Appraiser: Malcolm Hall Coleman License #: TX 1335110 G License Expires: 07/31/2021 Douglas E. Oldmixon Commissioner Certified General Real Estate Appraiser Having provided satisfactory evidence of the qualifications required by the Texas Appraiser Licensing and Certification Act, Occupations Code, Chapter 1103, authorization is granted to use this title: Certified General Real Estate Appraiser For additional information or to file a complaint please contact TALCB at www.talcb.texas.gov. MALCOLM HALL COLEMAN 200 CONCORD PLAZA STE 800 SAN ANTONIO, TX 78216 © 2020 CBRE, Inc. Addenda ADDENDUM G CBRE Specialty Practice Brochure © 2020 CBRE, Inc. Photo Credit: Balfour at Riverfront Park Used with Permission cbre.us/shvas SENIORS HOUSING & CARE P R A C T I C E CBRE VALUATION & ADVISORY SERVICES © 2020 CBRE, Inc. http://cbre.us/shvas SENIORS HOUSING ADVANTAGE CBRE is the industry-leading provider of valuation and advisory services for real estate lenders, owners, investors and operators throughout the U.S. • Active Adult • Independent Living • Assisted Living • Memory Care • Nursing Care • CCRC/LPC • Hospice Facilities OUR SERVICES • Appraisals • Portfolio Valuations • Market & Feasibility Studies • HUD Sections 232 & 242 • Litigation Support • Underwriting Due Diligence • Net Asset Valuations, per IPA • Purchase Price Allocation • Property Condition Reports • Environmental Assessments PROPERT Y T YPES Industry Involvement: Our leadership is active in the industry through various speaking engagements for the Appraisal Institute, NIC, ULI, NCREIF, and other industry- specific conferences. Our team holds leadership positions with ULI’s Seniors Housing Council and are on the Advisory Committee for the American Seniors Housing Association (ASHA). Quality Control: All reports utilize a specialized format to ensure consistent methodology, content and presentation. Our reports are USPAP and FIRREA compliant. Commitment to Service: CBRE is the world’s largest commercial real estate services firm with 449 offices in more than 60 countries. Delivering credible, client centric, on-the- ground expertise in every major market, our specialty practice has access to the largest and most sophisticated service platform in the world. As our client, so will you. “CBRE continually exceeds our expectations with their “white glove” service and expertise. Their profound knowledge of the seniors housing and healthcare space, as well as their ability to articulate their valuation process and conclusions, has proven to be a valuable asset to our firm.” Photo Credit: Balfour at Riverfront Park Used with Permission © 2020 CBRE, Inc. CLICK HERE TO VIEW OUR SENIORS HOUSING RESEARCH CBRE’s research platform is the largest and most comprehensive of its kind in the industry, providing leading insights on seniors housing data, trends and analysis. 22+ specialists 50 states 1,848 2018 assignments 36 2018 portfolios 6+ MAIs $30B 2018 valuations Top Global Real Estate Advisor for Valuation Services -Euromoney GLOBAL RECOGNITION Fortune 500 Company since 2008 #207 in 2018 A World’s Most Ethical Company six years in a row -Ethisphere Top Real Estate Brand for 18 consecutive years -The Lipsey Company SENIORS HOUSING ADVANTAGE INDUSTRY-LEADING PERSPECTIVES Seniors Housing Benchmarking & Portfolio Optimization VALUATION & ADVISORY SERVICES cbre.us/shvas © 2020 CBRE, Inc. http://www.cbre.com/shvas http://www.cbre.us/real-estate-services/real-estate-industries/healthcare-services/healthcare-valuation http://cbre.us/shvas CBRE VALUATION & ADVISORY SERVICES SENIORS HOUSING & CARE PLATFORM CA HI AZ NM CO WY UT MT ND SD MN IA NENV TX LA AR OK KS ID WA OR MS NC SC FL KY AL GA TN OH IL IN MIWI MO VA MD DE WV NJ NY PA RI MA CT VT NH ME Seniors Housing Specialty Location General Valuation & Advisory Services LocationSeniors Housing Specialty Location cbre.us/shvas JAMES A . GR ABER, MAI Managing Director Seniors Housing & Healthcare | Practice Leader T +1 347 722 0225 james.graber@cbre.com View Professional Profile Valuation & Advisory Services Location DANIEL LINCOLN, MAI Director Seniors Housing & Healthcare T +1 205 582 5733 daniel.lincoln@cbre.com View Professional Profile © 2020 CBRE, Inc. http://cbre.us/shvas http://www.cbre.us/people-and-offices/james-graber mailto:daniel.lincoln%40cbre.com?subject= http://www.cbre.us/people-and-offices/daniel-lincoln Allocation of the Going Concern Certification Subject Photographs Executive Summary Allocation of the Going Concern Extraordinary Assumptions Hypothetical Conditions Table of Contents Addenda Introduction Property Identification Primary Unit of Measure Ownership and Property History Premise of the Appraisal Purpose of the Appraisal Intended Use of Report Intended User of Report Scope of Work Extent to Which the Property was Inspected Type and Extent of the Data Researched Type and Extent of Analysis Applied Data Resources Utilized in the Analysis Seniors Housing Industry Overview Property Types by Services Provided Asset Components Exposure/Marketing Time Area Analysis Regional Overview Neighborhood Analysis Location Boundaries Land Use & Growth Patterns Proximity to Healthcare Providers Access Demographics Area & Neighborhood Conclusion Market Analysis Seniors Housing Market Overview National Seniors Housing Overview National Assisted Living Overview National Owners & Operators Demand Influences National Capitalization Rate Trends Capitalization Rate & Price Per Unit Trends Current Market Condition Considerations – COVID Impact National Occupancy Trends - COVID Impact Market Summary - COVID Impact Submarket Trends Primary Market Area Performance Summary Future Supply Direct Competitors Subject’s Market Trends Submarket Summary Penetration Analysis Supply Barriers to Entry Market Occupancy Demand Analysis Population by Age Cohorts Income Distributions Penetration Analysis Conclusion Market Analysis Conclusion Assisted Living Penetration Supply and Demand Conclusion Subject Analysis Licensure Requirements Management Overview Absorption Stabilized Occupancy Estimate Conclusion Site Analysis Adjacent Properties Flood Zone Conclusion Improvement Analysis Layout of Improvements Conformity Description of Improvements Utilities Fire Protection Project Amenities Parking and Drives Landscaping Functional Utility ADA Compliance Furniture, Fixtures and Equipment Environmental Issues Cost to Complete (Capital Expenditures) Economic Age and Life Conclusion Zoning Tax and Assessment Data Tax Comparables Conclusion Highest and Best Use As If Vacant Legally Permissible Physically Possible Financially Feasible Maximally Productive Conclusion: Highest and Best Use As If Vacant As Improved Legally Permissible Physically Possible Financially Feasible Maximally Productive Conclusion: Highest and Best Use As Improved Appraisal Methodology Cost Approach Sales Comparison Approach Income Capitalization Approach Methodology Applicable to the Subject Excess Land Value Discussion/Analysis of Land Sales Land Sale One Land Sale Two Land Sale Three Land Sale Four Summary of Adjustments Conclusion Insurable Value (Replacement Cost) Sales Comparison Approach Analysis of Improved Sales Improved Sale One Improved Sale Two Improved Sale Three Improved Sale Four Improved Sale Five Consideration for COVID-19 Summary of Adjustments Price Per Unit Comparison Effective Gross Income Multiplier Analysis Sales Comparison Approach Conclusion Income Capitalization Approach Analysis of Rent Comparables Rent Comparable One Rent Comparable Two Rent Comparable Three Rent Comparable Four Rent Comparable Five Operating Summary Subject Rental Information Operating Revenue Analysis Market Rent Estimate Subsidized Rents Assisted Living Memory Care Rent Adjustments Rent Roll Analysis Potential Rental Income Conclusion Market Rent Conclusions Concessions Level of Care Income Second Resident Fees Community Fee Other Income Vacancy Effective Gross Income Operating Expense Analysis Expense Comparables COVID-19 Operating Expense Considerations Real Estate Taxes Property Insurance Utilities Administrative & General Marketing Resident Care Culinary Services Laundry & Housekeeping Repairs & Maintenance Programming Payroll Taxes & Benefits Payroll Allocation Summary Operating Expenses Management Fee Reserves for Replacement Total Operating Expense Conclusion Net Operating Income Conclusion Direct Capitalization Comparable Sales Published Investor Surveys Band of Investment COVID-19 Capitalization Rate Considerations Capitalization Rate Conclusion Strengths/ Opportunities Weaknesses/ Threats Direct Capitalization Summary Discounted Cash Flow Analysis (DCF) General Assumptions Growth Rate Assumptions Leasing Assumptions Occupancy Assumptions Vacancy, Credit Loss and Absorption Discount Rate Analysis Terminal Capitalization Rate Discounted Cash Flow Conclusion Cost to Achieve Stabilized Operations Conclusion of Income Capitalization Approach Reconciliation of Value Allocation of the Going Concern Lease Coverage Analysis Furniture, Fixtures and Equipment Allocation of the Going Concern Conclusion Assumptions and Limiting Conditions Appraisal of Brookdale Castle Hills 1207 Jackson Keller Road, San Antonio, Texas 78213 Prepared for: American Eagle Lifecare Corporation JLL File Number: 1400-18-141077 700 E. Campbell Road, Suite 265 Richardson, TX 75081 Phone: 972 960 1222 Fax: 972 960 2922 July 10, 2018 Elan Ruggill American Eagle Lifecare Corporation 3819 Hawk Crest Road Ann Arbor, Michigan 48103 Subject: Brookdale Castle Hills 1207 Jackson Keller Road San Antonio, Texas 78213 Pursuant to your request, we have completed an appraisal of the above-referenced property. Accompanying this letter is an Appraisal Report that contains a detailed identification of the property, factual data concerning the property and its surroundings, comparable market data, and appropriate analyses. Our analyses and forecasts have resulted in the conclusion(s) below: Appraisal Premise Date of Value Value Conclusion Market Value of the Specified Assets of the Business As Is, Fee Simple Estate June 29, 2018 $10,700,000 Investment Value Assuming Not-For-Profit Ownership and Ad Valorem Exemption June 29, 2018 $13,680,000 Prospective Market Value of the Specified Assets of the Business Upon Stabilization December 29, 2018 $11,950,000 Value Conclusions Our valuation is based on terms of cash and a reasonable exposure time of six months prior to the effective date of value. The estimated marketing period is also six months. The specified assets of the business exclude certain items not normally conveyed, such as cash on hand, accounts receivable, accounts payable, management company trademarks, and proprietary management systems. Please refer to the assumptions and limiting conditions section where any extraordinary assumptions and hypothetical conditions specific to this engagement are discussed. The subject was appraised based upon the going concern premise as an on-going business operation. Our value allocation(s) follow: Page 2 Brookdale Castle Hills Component Real Property FF&E Intangibles and Goodwill Market Value of the Specified Assets of the Business As Is, Fee Simple Estate Component Real Property FF&E Intangibles and Goodwill Investment Value Assuming Not-For-Profit Ownership and Ad Valorem Exemption Component Real Property FF&E Intangibles and Goodwill Prospective Market Value of the Specified Assets of the Business Upon Stabilization Value Allocation Allocated Value $10,910,000 $2,220,000 $550,000 $13,680,000 $11,950,000 Value Allocation Allocated Value $10,120,000 $440,000 $1,390,000 $10,700,000 Value Allocation $830,000 Allocated Value $9,400,000 $470,000 We appreciate this opportunity to provide valuation services to American Eagle Lifecare Corporation. JLL Valuation and Advisory Services, LLC Andrea Roberts Senior Analyst Texas Certified General Appraiser #TX-1380731-G Telephone: 214-396-5453 Email: andrea.roberts@am.jll.com Page 3 Brookdale Castle Hills Brian L. Chandler, MAI, CRE, FRICS Executive Vice President Texas Certified General Appraiser #TX-1324513-G Telephone: 214-396-5423 Email: brian.chandler@am.jll.com 4 Brookdale Castle Hills Certification I hereby certify that, to the best of our knowledge and belief: ■ The statements of fact contained in this report are true and correct. ■ The reported analyses, opinions, and conclusions are limited only by the reported assumptions and limiting conditions and are our personal, impartial, and unbiased professional analyses, opinions, and conclusions. ■ I have no present or prospective interest in the property that is the subject of this report and no personal interest with respect to the parties involved. ■ I have no bias with respect to the property that is the subject of this report or to the parties involved with this assignment. ■ Our engagement in this assignment was not contingent upon developing or reporting predetermined results. ■ Our compensation for completing this assignment is not contingent upon the development or reporting of a predetermined value or direction in value that favors the cause of the client, the amount of the value opinion, the attainment of a stipulated result, or the occurrence of a subsequent event directly related to the intended use of this appraisal. ■ Our analyses, opinions, and conclusions were developed, and this report has been prepared, in conformity with the Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice. ■ Andrea Roberts has made a personal inspection of the property that is the subject of this report. Brian L. Chandler, MAI, CRE, FRICS has not made a personal inspection of the property that is the subject of this report. ■ Andrea Roberts assisted in the compilation and analysis of factual data used in this report. Andrea Roberts is an employee of JLL Valuation & Advisory Services, LLC. No other persons provided significant real property appraisal assistance to the persons signing this certification. ■ I certify that, to the best of my knowledge and beliefs, the reported analyses, opinions, and conclusions were developed and this report has been prepared in conformity with the requirements of the Code of Professional Ethics and the Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice of the Appraisal Institute. ■ I certify that the use of this report is subject to the requirements of the Appraisal Institute relating to review by its duly authorized representatives. ■ USPAP 2018-19 requires the appraiser to disclose “any services regarding the subject property performed by the appraiser within the three year period immediately preceding acceptance of the assignment, as an appraiser or in any other capacity.” Pursuant to that requirement, to the best of our knowledge, we: ● Have not performed any services in connection with the subject property within the three-year period immediately preceding acceptance of this assignment, either as an appraiser or in any other capacity. 5 Brookdale Castle Hills ■ As of the date of this report, Brian L. Chandler, MAI, CRE, FRICS has completed the continuing education program for Designated Members of the Appraisal Institute. ■ Various analysts employed by JLL Valuation and Advisory Services, LLC procured the comparable data used in this report. Andrea Roberts Senior Analyst Texas Certified General Appraiser #TX-1380731-G Telephone: 214-396-5453 Email: andrea.roberts@am.jll.com Brian L. Chandler, MAI, CRE, FRICS Executive Vice President Texas Certified General Appraiser #TX-1324513-G Telephone: 214-396-5423 Email: brian.chandler@am.jll.com 6 Brookdale Castle Hills Table of Contents Page No. Letter of Transmittal 1 Certification 4 Table of Contents 6 Addenda 7 Summary of Salient Facts and Conclusions 8 Strengths and Weaknesses 11 General Information 12 Assumptions and Limiting Conditions 22 Regional Economic Analysis 28 Market Area Description and Analysis 35 Site Description and Analysis 47 Improvement Description and Analysis 50 Legal Constraints Analysis 63 Ad Valorem Tax Analysis 73 Seniors Housing Market Analysis 77 Supply and Demand Analysis 86 Highest and Best Use Analysis 105 Income Capitalization - Direct Capitalization 107 Sales Comparison Approach 153 Land Valuation 165 FF&E Analysis 170 Absorption and Income Loss Analysis 171 Conclusion 174 7 Brookdale Castle Hills Addenda Legal Description Appendix A Maps, Plats, Building Plans Appendix B Comparable Profiles Appendix C Operating Data Appendix D Letter of Engagement Appendix E Analyst Qualifications Appendix F 8 Brookdale Castle Hills Summary of Salient Facts and Conclusions Andrea Roberts TX-1380731-G Certified General Brian L. Chandler, MAI, CRE, FRICS TX-1324513-G Certified General 5.00 Certification Types: 6.76 Zoning Compliance: Certified Appraisers: Certification Numbers: Primary Site Size (Acres): Legal, conforming use All standard municipal utilities available Shape: Mostly rectangular Certification Types: Site Summary - Utilities: Zoning: C Excess Land Site Size (Acres): Brookdale Castle Hills To estimate the value of the going concern under the following scenario(s): Property Name: Property Identification - Municipality: Street Address: 1207 Jackson Keller Road San Antonio Census Tract - 48 Bexar Texas 78213 Zip: State: County: State Code: Purpose of the Appraisal: County Code: 029 Tract/BNA Code: 1911.02 Certified Appraisers: Certification Numbers: Assets and Property Rights Appraised - Property Rights Appraised: Fee Simple Certification - All assets of the business enterprise including real property, FF&E and business value Assets Appraised: Market Value of the Specified Assets of the Business As Is, Fee Simple Estate Investment Value Assuming Not-For-Profit Ownership and Ad Valorem Exemption Prospective Market Value of the Specified Assets of the Business Upon Stabilization 9 Brookdale Castle Hills 101 71.3% 80.0% 6Months to Achieve Stabilization: Number of Stories: 80 Number of Operating Beds: Number of Licensed Beds: Continued use as a seniors housing facility As Vacant: As Improved: Highest & Best Use Summary - 160 Development of a seniors housing facility 97 Assisted Living Units: Total Units: Occupancy Analysis - Occupancy as of Effective Date: Stabilized Occupancy Forecast: Improvement Summary - No Seniors housing 2000 3 Number of Buildings: 1 & 2 Construction Type: Year of Construction: 89,140 Gross Building Area (SF): Class D Property Type: Flood Insurance Required: Assisted Living, Memory Care Care Provided: 17 Memory Care Units: Flood Hazard Zone - 48029C0245G, Effective September 29, 2010 Zone X Zone: Panel Number: 10 Brookdale Castle Hills Approach to Value Income Capitalization - Direct Capitalization Sales Comparison Cost Approach to Value Income Capitalization - Direct Capitalization Value Scenario Effective Date Value Conclusions Market Value of the Specified Assets of the Business As Is, Fee Simple Estate 6/29/2018 $10,700,000 Investment Value Assuming Not-For-Profit Ownership and Ad Valorem Exemption 6/29/2018 $13,680,000 Prospective Market Value of the Specified Assets of the Business Upon Stabilization 12/29/2018 $11,950,000 Component Real Property FF&E Intangibles and Goodwill Market Value of the Specified Assets of the Business As Is, Fee Simple Estate Component Real Property FF&E Intangibles and Goodwill Investment Value Assuming Not-For-Profit Ownership and Ad Valorem Exemption Component Real Property FF&E Intangibles and Goodwill Prospective Market Value of the Specified Assets of the Business Upon Stabilization Value Allocation Allocated Value $10,910,000 $2,220,000 $550,000 $13,680,000 $11,950,000 Value Allocation Allocated Value $10,120,000 $440,000 $1,390,000 $10,700,000 Value Allocation $830,000 Allocated Value $9,400,000 $470,000 As Is Value Indications Value Conclusion Value Indication $10,700,000 Upon Stabilization Value Indication Value Indication $11,950,000 $10,800,000 Not Developed 11 Brookdale Castle Hills Strengths and Weaknesses Strengths of the property include: ■ Strong Market Occupancy: Occupancy is high for the rent comparables for Memory Care. ■ MC Subject vs. PMA Occupancy: The Memory Care segment indicates an average occupancy for the rent comparables of 94.1% and all facilities in the PMA of 75.0%. The subject occupancy is currently performing above the market indications and has an occupancy of 89.0%. ■ Strong Market Demand: The PMA has an undersupply of 469 beds of assisted living and 203 beds of memory care in the current year. There are no planned additions to the competitive supply. Weaknesses of the property include: ■ Subject Occupancy: The subject property currently has a low occupancy of 71.3%. Occupancy at the subject property has lagged that of the market. Management noted that its location and layout are the two biggest factors impacting occupancy. The majority of incoming residents cannot live on the second floor due to evacuation restrictions; therefore, the second floor units are difficult to lease-up. In addition, the subject’s location and visibility is inferior to competing properties in the market. ■ Housing Values: The subject’s PMA has a low median housing value of $168,465, which is 22.9% below the United States median housing value of $218,492. ■ Income Levels: The subject’s PMA has a low median household income of $46,482, which is well below the United States median household income of $58,100. It is additionally noted that the median income level for the senior cohorts are below the median income for each respective cohort including 65 to 74, 75 to 84, and 85+. ■ Senior Housing Growth: The senior housing age cohorts of the 65 Plus Population, 75 Plus Population and 85 Plus Population are forecast to grow at slower rates in comparison to the United States over the next five years. 12 Brookdale Castle Hills General Information Identification of the Subject The subject is an existing seniors housing facility located at 1207 Jackson Keller Road, San Antonio, Bexar County, Texas, and it is known as Brookdale Castle Hills. A legal description for the subject is presented in the Addendum. Front View of Subject The subject is an assisted living and memory care facility. It has 97 units, including 17 in a secure memory care building. Current occupancy is 71.3%. The facility has 89,140 square feet in a two story structure. The facility is well located and exhibits good quality of construction. In this appraisal, we are valuing the subject as is and upon stabilization. In addition, per the client’s request, we have also valued the subject’s investment value assuming not-for-profit ownership and ad valorem tax exemption. Purpose of the Appraisal The purpose of this appraisal is to estimate the market value of the subject under the following scenario(s): ● Market Value of the Specified Assets of the Business As Is, Fee Simple Estate ● Investment Value Assuming Not-For-Profit Ownership and Ad Valorem Exemption ● Prospective Market Value of the Specified Assets of the Business Upon Stabilization 13 Brookdale Castle Hills Intended User(s) and Intended Uses(s) American Eagle Lifecare Corporation is the intended user of this report. The intended use is to assist client in obtaining bond financing. Pertinent Dates Dates pertinent to this assignment are as follows: Item Date Report Date July 10, 2018 Market Value of the Specified Assets of the Business As Is, Fee Simple Estate June 29, 2018 Investment Value Assuming Not-For-Profit Ownership and Ad Valorem Exemption June 29, 2018 Prospective Market Value of the Specified Assets of the Business Upon Stabilization December 29, 2018 Pertinent Dates Prior Services USPAP 2018-2019 requires the appraiser to disclose “any services regarding the subject property performed by the appraiser within the three year period immediately preceding acceptance of the assignment, as an appraiser or in any other capacity.” Pursuant to that requirement, to the best of our knowledge, we: ■ Have not performed any services in connection with the subject property within the three- year period immediately preceding acceptance of this assignment, either as an appraiser or in any other capacity. Definition of Market Values For purposes of this appraisal, market value and as is market value are defined as: Market value: The most probable price which a property should bring in a competitive and open market, under all conditions requisite to a fair sale, the buyer and seller each acting prudently and knowledgeably, and assuming the price is not affected by undue stimulus. Implicit in this definition is the consummation of a sale as of a specified date and the passing of title from seller to buyer under conditions whereby: 1. Buyer and seller are typically motivated; 2. Both parties are well informed or well advised, and acting in what they consider their own best interests; 3. A reasonable time is allowed for exposure in the open market; 4. Payment is made in terms of cash in U.S. dollars or in terms of financial arrangements comparable thereto; and 14 Brookdale Castle Hills 5. The price represents the normal consideration for the property sold unaffected by special or creative financing or sales concessions granted by anyone associated with the sale. 1 As Is Market Value: The estimate of the market value of real property in its current physical condition, use, and zoning as of the appraisal’s effective date. 2 Assets Appraised Seniors housing and health care assets are generally considered to be business enterprises and may have value in excess of the real estate value. Such assets can be valued based upon the liquidation premise or the going concern premise. The liquidation premise would only be used if the highest and best use of the asset is to sell the component parts separately. This is not the case with the subject, so the subject is valued based upon the going concern premise. The term going concern is defined as follows: One of the premises under which the total assets of a business (TAB) can be valued; the assumption that a company is expected to continue operating well into the future (usually indefinitely). Under the going concern premise, the value of a business is equal to the sum of the value of the tangible assets and the value of the intangible assets, which may include the value of excess profit, where asset values are derived consistent with the going concern premise. 3 When a property is valued based upon the going concern premise, the valuation may include real estate, FF&E and intangibles. These assets in total compromise the Total Assets of a Business (TAB), defined as follows: The tangible property (real property and personal property, including inventory and furniture, fixtures and equipment) and intangible property (cash, workforce, contracts, name, patents, copyrights and other residual intangible assets, to include capitalized economic profit).4 When appraised based upon the going concern premise, the Market Value of the Total Assets of the Business (MVTAB) is defined as follows: The market value of all of the tangible and intangible assets of a business as if sold in aggregate as a going concern.5 Definitions of the components that compromise the TAB are as follows: 1. 12 C.F.R. Part 34.42(g); 55 Federal Register 34696, August 24, 1990 as amended at 57 Federal Register 12202, April 9, 1992; 59 Federal Register 29499, June 7, 1994. 2. The Dictionary of Real Estate Appraisal (Chicago, IL: Appraisal Institute, Sixth Edition). 3. The Dictionary of Real Estate Appraisal (Chicago, IL: Appraisal Institute, Sixth Edition). 4. The Dictionary of Real Estate Appraisal (Chicago, IL: Appraisal Institute, Sixth Edition). 5. The Dictionary of Real Estate Appraisal (Chicago, IL: Appraisal Institute, Sixth Edition). 15 Brookdale Castle Hills Real property: All interests, benefits, and rights inherent in the ownership of physical real estate; the bundle of rights with which the ownership of the real estate is endowed. In some states, real property is defined by statute and is synonymous with real estate. 6 Furniture, fixtures and equipment (FF&E): The movable property of a business enterprise not classified as stock or inventory or leasehold improvements; frequently found in the ownership of hotels or motels, restaurants, assisted living facilities, service stations, car washes, greenhouses and nurseries, and other service intensive properties. Furniture, fixtures and equipment frequently wears out much more rapidly that other components of those properties.7 Business enterprise value: A term applied to the concept of the value contribution of the total intangible assets of a continuing business enterprise such as marketing and management skill, an assembled workforce, working capital, trade names, franchises, patents, trademarks, contracts, leases, and operating agreements.8 However, it should be noted that some of the assets included in the definition of TAB are not commonly included in the value or sale of a seniors housing facility. Items normally excluded are: cash on hand, working capital, accounts receivable, and accounts payable. As such, our valuation focuses upon the specified assets of the business, which excludes the items noted. In addition, we have provided an allocation of our concluded value. Note that the allocation is based upon the continuation of the business enterprise. If the business ceases operations, the values of the individual components would likely be different than the value allocated to the components based upon the continuation of the business operation. Property Rights Appraised Definitions of the three major classes of property rights are as follows: Fee simple estate: Absolute ownership unencumbered by any other interest or estate, subject only to the limitations imposed by the governmental powers of taxation, eminent domain, police power, and escheat.9 Leased fee interest: A freehold (ownership interest) where the possessory interest has been granted to another party by creation of a contractual landlord-tenant relationship (i.e., a lease)10 6. The Dictionary of Real Estate Appraisal (Chicago, IL: Appraisal Institute, Sixth Edition). 7. The Dictionary of Real Estate Appraisal (Chicago, IL: Appraisal Institute, Sixth Edition). 8. The Dictionary of Real Estate Appraisal (Chicago, IL: Appraisal Institute, Sixth Edition). 9. The Dictionary of Real Estate Appraisal (Chicago, IL: Appraisal Institute, Sixth Edition). 10. The Dictionary of Real Estate Appraisal (Chicago, IL: Appraisal Institute, Sixth Edition). 16 Brookdale Castle Hills Leasehold estate: The tenant’s possessory interest created by a lease.11 Investment Value: The value of a property interest to a particular investor or class of investors based on the investor’s specific requirements. Investment value may be different from market value because it depends on a set of investment criteria that are not necessarily typical of market. [12] The property rights valued in this appraisal are Fee Simple. As previously stated, we have also provided an investment value based on not-for-profit ownership and ad valorem tax exemption. Scope of Work USPAP 2018-2019 states: For each appraisal and appraisal review assignment, an appraiser must: 1. Identify the problem to be solved; 2. Determine and perform the scope of work necessary to develop credible assignment results; and 3. Disclose the scope of work in the report. Pursuant to that requirement, the steps in the appraisal process are as follows: 11. The Dictionary of Real Estate Appraisal (Chicago, IL: Appraisal Institute, Sixth Edition). 17 Brookdale Castle Hills The Valuation Process Definition of the Problem Identification Intended Purpose of Date of Identification of Extraordinary Hypothetical of client/ use of appraisal opinion characteristics assumptions conditions intended users appraisal (including of value of property definition of (including location value) and property rights to be valued) Scope of Work Data Collection and Property Description Market Area Data Subject Property Data Comparable Property Data General characteristics Specific characteristics of Sales, listing, offerings, of region, city, and neighborhood land and improvements, personal vacancies, cost and depreciation, property, business assets, etc. income and expenses, capitalization rates, etc. Data Analysis Market Analysis Highest and Best Use Analysis Demand studies Site as though vacant Supply studies Ideal improvement Marketability studies Property as improved Land Value Options Application of the Approaches to Value Cost Sales comparison Income capitalization Reconciliation of Value Indications and Final Opinion of Value Report of Defined Value 18 Brookdale Castle Hills Inspection Andrea Roberts has conducted an inspection of the subject. Brian L. Chandler, MAI, CRE, FRICS has not conducted an inspection of the subject. Data Collection Three types of data are normally gathered while completing an appraisal: general, specific, and competitive supply and demand. General Data General data concerns the social, economic, governmental, and environmental forces that impact property values. This data is found in the area description and analysis, and the neighborhood description and analysis sections of this report. We have gathered the general data from a variety of sources and publications, which are noted in the analyses. In addition, the general data concerning the neighborhood is based upon observations made during our inspection of the neighborhood. Specific Data The data relating to the property being appraised and comparable properties is referred to as specific data. Documents we have relied upon for specific data pertaining to the subject are listed in the general assumptions section. Additional data pertaining to the subject has been gathered from zoning maps, tax records, and other resources maintained in our library, city halls, chambers of commerce, Bexar County, and various state of Texas offices. The specific comparable data has been gathered from market participants. The extent of the comparable market data collection process varies for each type of comparable data. Refer to discussions preceding the presentation of data in the approaches to value for descriptions of the data sources consulted and the search criteria. Competitive Supply and Demand Data An analysis of seniors housing supply and demand conditions is included in this report. Approaches to Value The three approaches to value are: The Income Capitalization Approach, typically referred to as the income approach is used to value commercial and investment properties. It capitalizes an income stream into a present value. This can be accomplished using revenue multipliers or a capitalization rate applied to net operating income (NOI). The NOI is gross potential income (GPI), less vacancy, less operating expenses, but excluding debt service or depreciation charges applied by accountants. NOI is synonymous with EBITDA. Alternatively, multiple years of NOI can be valued by a discounted cash flow analysis (DCF) model. 19 Brookdale Castle Hills The Sales Comparison Approach, derives a value indication by comparing the subject being appraised to similar properties that have recently sold. The Cost Approach, based on the principle of substitution which asserts that no prudent buyer or investor will pay more for a property than that amount for which the site could be acquired, and which improvements that have equal desirability and utility can be constructed without undue delay. It is a method of appraising property based on the depreciated reproduction or replacement cost new of improvements, plus the market value of the site. In appraising the subject, we have applied the approaches to value as follows: Approach to Value Developed Applicability Income Capitalization - Direct Capitalization Yes Highly applicable Sales Comparison Yes Applicable, but not as relevant as income approach Cost No Applicable, but not as relevant as income approach Approaches to Value The cost approach was not developed. The subject was built in 2000 and the cost approach is generally only reliable for new or nearly new properties. Report Type Standards Rule 2-2 of the Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice sets forth two different reporting options, as follows: Appraisal Report: should summarize all pertinent data considered and summarize all analyses developed in arriving at the conclusion of value. Restricted Report: merely states the major conclusions without discussion of the data considered and the analyses conducted. This report is intended to comply with the requirements for an Appraisal Report. Compliance We have developed this appraisal in compliance with: ● The requirements of the Code of Ethics and the Standards of Professional Practice of the Appraisal Institute; ● The Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice promulgated by the Appraisal Foundation; and ● FIRREA Title XI, 12 CFR Part 323 (FDIC) and 12 CFR Part 34 (RTC). 20 Brookdale Castle Hills Competency Charles A. Bissell, MAI, ASA, CRE, is Managing Director and Brian L. Chandler, MAI, CRE, FRICS, is Executive Vice President of JLL’s Valuation and Advisory Services group. Mr. Bissell and Mr. Chandler specialize in the valuation of seniors housing and health care properties. Since 2002, Mr. Bissell, Mr. Chandler and their team have completed in excess of 10,000 assignments related to seniors housing and health care properties. Assignments have been completed in all 50 states, the District of Columbia, and Canada. Ownership, History and Management of the Subject USPAP Standards Rules 1-5(a) and (b) require an appraiser, when the value opinion to be developed is market value, and if such information is available to the appraiser in the normal course of business, to analyze (1) all agreements of sale, options, or listings of the subject property current as of the effective date of the appraisal and (2) all sales of the subject property that occurred within three years prior to the effective date of the appraisal. The subject’s current ownership, ownership history, current status, and management are discussed below. Current Ownership The subject is currently owned by ARC Castle Hills LP. It is operated by Brookdale Senior Living, a related entity. Ownership History There has not been a sale or other transfer of the subject in the three years preceding the date of appraisal. Current Status The subject is currently owned and operated by affiliates of Brookdale Senior Living, which are related entities. The subject is one of 17 properties that is under contract to sell to American Eagle Lifecare Corporation, who will purchase each facility through a separate wholly-owned LLC subsidiary with one intermediate holding company. These entities will be formed prior to execution of this agreement. The purchase price for all 17 assets is $224,500,000. In addition, the buyer plans on spending approximately $7 million in capital expenditures, resulting in total expenditures of $231,500,000. The purchase price is not allocated by property. We have also provided a Portfolio Report that will analyze the purchase price as compared to our valuation of the properties. This report is referenced to comply with USPAP reporting requirements. 21 Brookdale Castle Hills Management The subject is currently operated by Brookdale Senior Living. Headquartered in Nashville, TN. Brookdale is the nation’s largest owner/operator of seniors housing facilities. Management at the facility and corporate level is considered prudent and capable. After purchase of the portfolio, new ownership will change management to another seniors housing operator, Greenbriar Senior Living. The company is headed by Michael Mays who has been in senior housing since 1992. The company operates for profit and not for profit senior housing facilities in the nation and is headquartered in Birmingham, Alabama. 22 Brookdale Castle Hills Assumptions and Limiting Conditions The use of this report is subject to the following assumptions and limiting conditions: ■ All reports and work product we deliver to you (collectively called “report”) represents an opinion of value, based on historical information and forecasts of market conditions. Actual results may vary from those forecast in the report. There is no guaranty or warranty that the opinion of value reflects the actual value of the property. ■ The conclusions stated in our report apply only as of the effective date of the appraisal, and no representation is made as to the effect of subsequent events. Assessed values may change significantly and unexpectedly over short periods. We are not liable for any conclusions in the report that may be different if there are subsequent changes in value. We are not liable for loss relating to reliance upon our report more than three months after its date. ■ There may be differences between projected and actual results because events and circumstances frequently do not occur as predicted, and those differences may be material. We are not liable for any loss arising from these differences. ■ We are not obligated to predict future political, economic or social trends. We assume no responsibility for economic factors that may affect or alter the opinions in the report if the economic factors were not present as of the date of the letter of transmittal accompanying the report. ■ The report reflects an appraisal of the property free of any liens or encumbrances unless otherwise stated. ■ We assume responsible ownership and competent property management. ■ The appraisal process requires information from a wide variety of sources. We have assumed that all information furnished by others is correct and complete, up to date and can be relied upon, but no warranty is given for its accuracy. We do not accept responsibility for erroneous information provided by others. We assume that no information that has a material effect on our appraisal has been withheld. 23 Brookdale Castle Hills ■ We assume the following, unless informed to the contrary in writing: Each property has a good and marketable title. All documentation is satisfactorily drawn and that there are no encumbrances, restrictions, easements or other adverse title conditions, which would have a material effect on the value of the interest under consideration. There is no material litigation pending involving the property. All information provided by the Client, or its agents, is correct, up to date and can be relied upon. We are not responsible for considerations requiring expertise in other fields, including but not limited to: legal descriptions, interpretation of legal documents and other legal matters, geologic considerations such as soils and seismic stability, engineering, or environmental and toxic contaminants. We recommend that you engage suitable consultants to advise you on these matters. ■ We assume that all engineering studies correct. The plot plans and illustrative material in the report are included only to help the reader visualize the property. ■ We assume that there are no hidden or unapparent conditions of the property, subsoil or structures that render it more or less valuable. We are not responsible for such conditions or for obtaining the engineering studies that may be required to discover them. ■ We assume that the property is in full compliance with all applicable federal, state, and local environmental regulations and laws unless the lack of compliance is stated, described, and considered in the report. We have not made or requested any environmental impact studies in conjunction with the report. We reserve the right to revise or rescind any opinion of value that is based upon any subsequent environmental impact studies. If any environmental impact statement is required by law, the report assumes that such statement will be favorable and will be approved by the appropriate regulatory bodies. ■ Unless otherwise stated in the report, you should assume that we did not observe any hazardous materials on the property. We have no knowledge of the existence of such materials on or in the property; however, we are not qualified to detect such substances, and we are not providing environmental services. The presence of substances such as asbestos, urea-formaldehyde foam insulation and other potentially hazardous materials may affect the value of the property. Our report assumes that there is no such material on or in the property that would cause a loss in value. We do not assume responsibility for such conditions or for any expertise or engineering knowledge required to discover them. We encourage you to retain an expert in this field, if desired. We are not responsible for any such environmental conditions that exist or for any engineering or testing that might be required to discover whether such conditions exist. We are not experts in the field of environmental conditions, and the report is not an environmental assessment of the property. 24 Brookdale Castle Hills ■ We may have reviewed available flood maps and may have noted in the report whether the property is generally located within or out of an identified Special Flood Hazard Area. However, we are not qualified to detect such areas and therefore do not guarantee such determinations. The presence of flood plain areas and/or wetlands may affect the value of the property. Any opinion of value we include in our report assumes that floodplain and/or wetlands interpretations are accurate. ■ The Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) became effective January 26, 1992. We have not made a specific survey or analysis of the property to determine whether it is in compliance with the ADA. We claim no expertise in ADA issues, and render no opinion regarding compliance of the property with ADA regulations. ■ We assume that the property conforms to all applicable zoning and use regulations and restrictions unless we have identified, described and considered a non-conformity in the report. ■ We assume that all required licenses, certificates of occupancy, consents, and other legislative or administrative authority from any local, state, or national government or private entity or organization have been or can be obtained or renewed for any use on which the opinion of value contained in the report is based. ■ We assume that the use of the land and improvements is confined within the boundaries or property lines of the property described and that there is no encroachment or trespass unless noted in the report. ■ We have not made any investigation of the financial standing of actual or prospective tenants unless specifically noted in the report. Where properties are valued with the benefit of leasing, we assume, unless we are informed otherwise, that the tenants are capable of meeting their financial obligations under the leases, all rent and other amounts payable under the leases have been paid when due, and that there are no undisclosed breaches of the leases. ■ We did not conduct a formal survey of the property and assume no responsibility for any survey matters. The Client has supplied the spatial data, including sketches and/or surveys included in the report, and we assume that data is correct, up to date and can be relied upon. ■ Unless otherwise stated, the opinion of value included in our report excludes any additional value attributable to goodwill, or to fixtures and fittings which are only of value, in situ, to the present occupier. We have made no allowance for any plant, machinery or equipment unless they form an integral part of the building and would normally be included in a sale of the building. We do not normally carry out or commission investigations into the capacity or condition of services being provided to the property. We assume that the services, and any associated controls or software, are in working order and free from defect. We also assume that the services are of sufficient capacity to meet current and future needs. 25 Brookdale Castle Hills ■ In the case of property where construction work is in progress, such as refurbishment or repairs, or where developments are in progress, we have relied upon cost information supplied to us by the Client or its appointed experts or upon industry accepted cost guides. In the case of property where construction work is in progress, or has recently been completed, we do not make allowance for any liability already incurred, but not yet discharged, in respect of completed work, or obligations in favor of contractors, subcontractors or any members of the professional or design team. We assume the satisfactory completion of construction, repairs or alterations in a workmanlike manner. ■ Any allocation in the report of value between the land and the improvements applies only under the stated program of utilization. The separate values allocated to the land and buildings must not be used in conjunction with any other appraisal and are invalid if so used. ■ The report is confidential to the party to whom it is addressed and those other intended users specified in the report for the specific purpose to which it refers. Use of the report for any other purpose or use by any party not identified as an intended user of the report without our prior written consent is prohibited, and we accept no responsibility for any use of the report in violation of the terms of this Agreement. ■ We are not required to testify or provide court-related consultation or to be in attendance in court unless we have agreed to do so in writing. ■ Neither the whole report, nor any part, nor reference thereto, may be published in any manner without our prior written approval. ■ We may rely on, and will not verify, the accuracy and sufficiency of documents, information and assumptions provided to it by the Client or others. We will not verify documents, information and assumptions derived from industry sources or that JLL or its affiliates have prepared in the regular course of business. We are not liable for any deficiency in the report arising from the inaccuracy or insufficiency of such information, documents and assumptions. However, our report will be based on our professional evaluation of all such available sources of information. ■ JLL IS NOT LIABLE TO ANY PERSON OR ENTITY FOR LOSS OF PROFITS, CONSEQUENTIAL, PUNITIVE, EXEMPLARY OR SIMILAR DAMAGES IN CONNECTION WITH THIS AGREEMENT. IN NO EVENT SHALL THE LIABILITY OF JLL AND ITS AFFILIATES IN CONNECTION WITH THIS AGREEMENT EXCEED THE FEE PAID TO JLL HEREUNDER. ■ Unless expressly advised to the contrary, we assume that appropriate insurance coverage is and will continue to be available on commercially acceptable terms. ■ We assume that no material changes in any applicable federal, state or local laws, regulations or codes (including, without limitation, the Internal Revenue Code) are anticipated. 26 Brookdale Castle Hills ■ We may determine during the course of the assignment that additional Hypothetical Conditions and Extraordinary Assumptions may be required in order to complete the assignment. The report will be subject to those Hypothetical Conditions and Extraordinary Assumptions. Each person that is permitted to use the report agrees to be bound by all the Assumptions and Limiting Conditions and any Hypothetical Conditions and Extraordinary Assumptions stated in the report. Extraordinary Assumptions USPAP defines an extraordinary assumption as “an assignment-specific assumption as of the effective date regarding uncertain information used in the analysis which, if found to be false, could alter the appraiser’s opinion of conclusions.” Our appraisal is subject to the following extraordinary assumptions: ■ The subject is valued based upon the going concern premise and is considered an on-going business enterprise. Our market value conclusion(s) include real estate, FF&E, and some intangible items. The allocation to the individual asset groups explicitly assumes the subject property will continue to operate as a going concern. Any individual allocation of value represents an opinion of the contributory value of the asset to the going concern. It is an extraordinary assumption of the appraisal that the asset allocations are part of a continuing going concern and do not represent the value of these assets separate from the going concern. The market value of the specified assets of the business is comprised of real property, personal property (FF&E), and intangible (non-realty) assets, such as business enterprise value. If any one of the assets is removed from the going concern, the remaining individual asset allocations of value may be rendered invalid. Furthermore, if the subject property discontinued operating, then the real estate allocated value, as well as the allocated value of the FF&E and business assets, may be much less than the reported value allocated to each component. The appraisal industry has not set forth a generally agreed upon methodology for the allocation of market value between real estate and non-realty items (FF&E and business assets). Differing allocation methods may result in widely varying allocations of value. Any user of the appraisal should be aware of and fully understand the above information. ■ We are also providing a value of the property assuming the subject will have not-for-profit and tax exempt status. As this is an investment value and the subject is currently a for-profit entity. ■ The subject site has improvements on the excess land, which needs to be demolished given it has no contributory value. 27 Brookdale Castle Hills Hypothetical Conditions USPAP defines a hypothetical condition as “a condition, directly related to a specific assignment, which is contrary to what is known by the appraiser to exist on the effective date of the assignment results, but is used for the purpose of analysis.” Our analysis is based upon the following hypothetical conditions: ■ None 28 Brookdale Castle Hills Regional Economic Analysis The subject is located in the San Antonio-New Braunfels, TX Metropolitan Statistical Area, hereinafter called the San Antonio MSA, as defined by the U.S. Office of Management and Budget. The San Antonio MSA is 7,312 square miles in size, and ranks #24 in population out of the nation’s 382 metropolitan areas. Population The San Antonio MSA has an estimated 2018 population of 2,453,759, which represents an average annual 1.7% increase over the 2010 census amount of 2,142,508. San Antonio MSA added an average of 38,906 residents per year over the 2010 - 2018 period, and its annual growth rate is greater than that of the United States. Looking forward, the San Antonio MSA’s population is projected to increase at a 1.9% annual rate from 2018 - 2023, equivalent to the addition of an average of 47,247 residents per year. The San Antonio MSA growth rate is expected to exceed that of the United States, which is projected to be 0.8%. Population Trends Population 2010 Census 2018 Est. 2023 Est. 2010 - 2018 2018 - 2023 San Antonio MSA 2,142,508 2,453,759 2,689,996 1.7% 1.9% United States 308,745,538 327,514,334 341,323,594 0.7% 0.8% Source: Esri 2018. Compiled by JLL Valuation & Advisory Services, LLC. Compound Ann. % Chng 29 Brookdale Castle Hills Employment The current estimate of total employment in the San Antonio MSA is 1,016,500 jobs. Since 2007, employment grew by 174,700 jobs, equivalent to a 20.8% gain over the entire period. There were gains in employment in eight of the past ten years despite the national economic downturn and slow recovery. The San Antonio MSA's rate of change in employment significantly outperformed the United States, which experienced an increase in employment of 4.6% or 6,307,000 over this period. A comparison of unemployment rates is another way of gauging an area’s economic health, where a higher unemployment rate is a negative indicator. Over the past decade, the San Antonio MSA unemployment rate of 5.4% has been lower than the United States rate of 7.0%. In the latter half of the decade that trend has continued, as the San Antonio MSA has consistently overperformed the United States. Recent data shows that the San Antonio MSA unemployment rate is 3.2%, in comparison to a 3.6% rate for the United States, a positive sign for the San Antonio MSA economy and one that is further magnified by the fact that the San Antonio MSA has outperformed the United States in the rate of job growth over the past two years. Employment Sectors The composition of the San Antonio MSA job market is illustrated in the chart below, paired with that of the United States. Total employment for the two areas is stratified by eleven major employment sectors, ranked from largest to smallest based on the percentage of San Antonio MSA jobs in each sector. Employment Trends Year San Antonio MSA Change United States Change San Antonio MSA United States 2007 841,800 137,999,000 4.0% 4.6% 2008 860,400 2.2% 137,242,000 -0.5% 4.6% 5.8% 2009 844,500 -1.8% 131,313,000 -4.3% 6.7% 9.3% 2010 851,700 0.9% 130,361,000 -0.7% 7.2% 9.6% 2011 867,900 1.9% 131,932,000 1.2% 7.1% 9.0% 2012 890,300 2.6% 134,175,000 1.7% 6.3% 8.1% 2013 918,500 3.2% 136,381,000 1.6% 5.7% 7.4% 2014 949,500 3.4% 138,958,000 1.9% 4.6% 6.2% 2015 980,700 3.3% 141,865,000 2.1% 3.8% 5.3% 2016 1,016,500 3.7% 144,306,000 1.7% 3.7% 5.0% Overall Change 2007-2016 174,700 20.8% 6,307,000 4.6% Avg Unemp. Rate 2007-2016 5.4% 7.0% Unemployment Rate - May 2018 3.2% 3.6% Unemployment Rate (Ann. Avg.)Total Employment (Annual Average) Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics. County employment is from the Quarterly Census of Employment & Wages (QCEW), all other areas use the Current Employment Survey (CES). Unemployment rates use the Current Population Survey (CPS). Data is not seasonally adjusted. 30 Brookdale Castle Hills The San Antonio MSA has a greater percentage employment than the United States in the following categories: ■ Trade, Transportation, Utilities - which accounts for 19.0% of San Antonio MSA payroll employment compared to 18.7% for the United States as a whole. This sector includes jobs in retail trade, wholesale trade, trucking, warehousing, and electric/gas/water utilities. ■ Leisure, Hospitality - which accounts for 11.2% of San Antonio MSA payroll employment compared to 10.0% for the United States as a whole. This sector includes employment in hotels, restaurants, recreation facilities, and arts and cultural institutions. ■ Other Services - which accounts for 9.9% of San Antonio MSA payroll employment compared to 9.3% for the United States as a whole. This sector includes establishments that do not fall within other defined categories, such as private households, churches, and laundry and dry cleaning establishments. ■ Financial Activities - which accounts for 8.7% of San Antonio MSA payroll employment compared to 6.7% for the United States as a whole. Banking, insurance, and investment firms are included in this sector, as are real estate owners, managers, and brokers. Employment Sectors - 2018 Source: Esri 2018. Compiled by JLL Valuation & Advisory Services, LLC. 1.9% 1.8% 4.5% 10.1% 7.2% 6.4% 6.7% 9.3% 10.0% 18.7% 23.5% 1.4% 1.6% 5.2% 5.6% 6.6% 8.0% 8.7% 9.9% 11.2% 19.0% 23.0% 0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% Natural Resources, Mining Information Government Manufacturing Professional, Business Services Construction Financial Activities Other Services Leisure, Hospitality Trade, Transportation, Utilities Education, Health Services San Antonio MSA United States 31 Brookdale Castle Hills The San Antonio MSA is underrepresented in the following categories: ■ Education, Health Services - which accounts for 23.0% of San Antonio MSA payroll employment compared to 23.5% for the United States as a whole. This sector includes employment in public and private schools, colleges, hospitals, and social service agencies. ■ Professional, Business Services - which accounts for 6.6% of San Antonio MSA payroll employment compared to 7.2% for the United States as a whole. This sector includes legal, accounting, and engineering firms, as well as management of holding companies. ■ Manufacturing - which accounts for 5.6% of San Antonio MSA payroll employment compared to 10.1% for the United States as a whole. This sector includes all establishments engaged in the manufacturing of durable and nondurable goods. ■ Information - which accounts for 1.6% of San Antonio MSA payroll employment compared to 1.8% for the United States as a whole. Publishing, broadcasting, data processing, telecommunications, and software publishing are included in this sector. Major Employers The table below contains major employers in the San Antonio MSA. Name Number of Employees 1 H-E-B 20,000 2 USAA 17,000 3 Methodist Healthcare System 8,118 4 Baptist Health System 6,498 5 JP Morgan Chase 5,200 6 Wells Fargo 5,153 7 AT&T 4,200 8 Bill Miller BBQ 3,540 9 Christus Santa Rosa Health Care 3,360 10 Rackspace 3,300 11 CPS Energy 3,022 12 Toyota Motor Manufacturing 2,900 13 Clear Channel Communications 2,800 14 Boeing 2,800 15 Southwest Research Institute 2,700 16 Frost Bank 2,100 17 Accenture 1,800 18 Valero Energy 1,653 19 Harland Clarke 1,500 20 KCI 1,400 Major Employers - San Antonio MSA 32 Brookdale Castle Hills Gross Domestic Product Based on Gross Domestic Product (GDP), the San Antonio MSA ranks #34 out of all metropolitan area economies in the nation. Economic growth, as measured by annual changes in GDP, has been somewhat higher in the San Antonio MSA than the United States overall during the past nine years. The San Antonio MSA has expanded at a 3.4% average annual rate while the United States has grown at a 1.1% rate. As the national economy improves, the San Antonio MSA continues to outperform the United States. GDP for the San Antonio MSA rose by 3.1% in 2016 while the United States's grew by 1.5%. The San Antonio MSA has a per capita GDP of $45,006, which is 11.0% less than the United States's GDP of $50,708. This means that the San Antonio MSA industries and employers are adding relatively much less to the economy than their peers in the United States. Gross Domestic Product is a measure of economic activity based on the total value of goods and services produced in a specific geographic area. The figures in the table above represent inflation adjusted “real” GDP stated in 2009 dollars. Gross Domestic Product ($ mil) ($ mil) Year San Antonio MSA Change United States Change 2007 $80,838 $14,798,367 2008 $82,381 1.9% $14,718,301 -0.5% 2009 $79,363 -3.7% $14,320,114 -2.7% 2010 $80,912 2.0% $14,628,165 2.2% 2011 $83,814 3.6% $14,833,679 1.4% 2012 $88,033 5.0% $15,126,281 2.0% 2013 $93,734 6.5% $15,348,034 1.5% 2014 $100,487 7.2% $15,717,536 2.4% 2015 $106,032 5.5% $16,148,378 2.7% 2016 $109,348 3.1% $16,385,170 1.5% Compound % Chg (2007-2016) 3.4% 1.1% GDP Per Capita 2016 $45,006 $50,708 Source: Bureau of Economic Analysis. The release of state and local GDP data has a longer lag time than national data. The data represents inflation-adjusted "real" GDP stated in 2009 dollars. 33 Brookdale Castle Hills Household Income The San Antonio MSA has a similar level of household income as the United States. Median household income for the San Antonio MSA is $56,143, which is comparable to the United States. The following chart shows the distribution of households across nine income levels. The San Antonio MSA has a comparable concentration of households in the lower income levels than the United States. Specifically, 30% of the San Antonio MSA households are below the $35,000 level in household income as compared to 31% of United States households. A smaller concentration of households exists in the higher income levels, as 37% of the San Antonio MSA households are at the $75,000 or greater levels in household income versus 38% of United States households. Median Household Income - 2018 Median San Antonio MSA $56,143 United States $56,124 Comparison of San Antonio MSA to United States 0.0% Source: Esri 2018. Compiled by JLL Valuation & Advisory Services, LLC. Household Income Distribution - 2018 Source: Esri 2018. Compiled by JLL Valuation & Advisory Services, LLC. 10.6% 9.7% 9.9% 13.5% 19.1% 12.7% 13.9% 5.3% 5.4% 11.5% 10.0% 9.7% 13.1% 17.8% 12.4% 13.9% 5.7% 6.1% 0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% Less than $15,000 $15,000-$24,999 $25,000-$34,999 $35,000-$49,999 $50,000-$74,999 $75,000-$99,999 $100,000-$149,999 $150,000-$199,999 $200,000 or greater San Antonio MSA United States 34 Brookdale Castle Hills Education and Age Residents of the San Antonio MSA have a lower level of educational attainment than those in the United States. An estimated 28% of the San Antonio MSA residents are college graduates with four- year degrees or higher, while United States residents have an estimated 31% with at least a four- year degree. People in the San Antonio MSA are younger than their peers in the United States. The median age of the San Antonio MSA is 35 years, while the United States is 38 years. Conclusion Over the long term, the subject’s region is forecast to experience population growth above that of the national average. The region is expected to experience employment growth at a rate above that of the nation as a whole. Area income levels are average. We anticipate the area’s economy will keep pace with the national economy over the foreseeable future. Education & Age - 2018 Source: Esri 2018. Compiled by JLL Valuation & Advisory Services, LLC. 31% 28% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% United States San Antonio MSA Percent College Graduates 38 35 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 United States San Antonio MSA Median Age 35 Brookdale Castle Hills Market Area Description and Analysis Delineation of Primary Market Area The Primary Market Area (PMA) for any form of rental real estate property is defined as the area from which a majority of the project’s tenants will be drawn. According to various industry sources, the PMA of a seniors housing care facility is determined by the density of the population, the proximity of competing properties, and the ease of transit in the surrounding area. The PMA for urban facilities is generally from 5 to 10 miles, for suburban facilities 5 to 20 miles, and for small town and rural facilities 20 to 30 miles12 as indicated in the following data. Distances that Residents Relocated from Distance Assisted Living Assisted & Independent Living CCRC Less than 5 miles 40.00% 43.50% 52.20% 5 to 10 miles 20.40% 20.00% 16.40% 11 to 25 miles 20.00% 15.30% 13.40% 25 to 50 miles 7.30% 5.90% 6.00% More than 50 miles 12.40% 15.30% 11.90% A number of factors tend to define a market area. One important factor is density. In rural areas, it may be many miles between towns large enough to sustain services, and residents are accustomed to driving significant distances to access services. Conversely, in urban or suburban areas, a resident may have a choice of competing services within a short drive of his or her home and will normally select the more proximal service provider or the service provider more convenient to access. Physical barriers can also shape market areas. Rivers, lakes, streams, military bases, and major highways are all examples of barriers that can constrain market areas. Barriers can also be psychological. For example, it is common for persons who live on one side of a highway to seldom access services in a similar area on the opposite side of the same highway, even though access is not constrained. Likewise, persons living in a given town or county are often reluctant to access services in an adjacent town or county. The location of competing facilities is also a factor to consider. In market areas served by a greater number of competing facilities, the primary drawing area for each facility tends to be smaller since residents of the market area tend to access the 12. Assisted Living Manual (Published by Assisted Living Federation of America) and Integrated Senior Care: Assisted Living and Long Term Care Manual (Published by Thompson Publishing Group). These radii are also supported by the criteria used by many national developers of seniors housing. 36 Brookdale Castle Hills service provider nearest their location. Each of these factors is considered in the delineation of the subject’s PMA. Physical Barriers There are no significant physical barriers in the immediate proximity of the subject that are believed to limit the subject's market area. Psychological Barriers The subject’s market area is not constrained by any known psychological barriers. Location of Competing Facilities There are competing facilities scattered throughout the area, indicating that seniors have a wide variety of facilities from which to choose. This tends to limit the size of market areas, as it is not necessary for seniors or adult children decision makers to travel far from the home to find suitable seniors housing. Market Area Delineation Conclusion Considering the physical and psychological barriers, population density, and the competing facilities’ concentration, we have concluded that an appropriate PMA for the subject is the area within a 4 mile radius of the site. In this market, we believe that the majority of demand will come from the PMA. No measurable draw from a secondary market area is forecast. 37 Brookdale Castle Hills Primary Market Area Map 38 Brookdale Castle Hills Composition The predominant land use in the market area is single-family residential. The estimated land use composition is shown in the following table: 5% 10% 5% 100% Retail & Personal Service Office Industrial Vacant Land 5% Total 10%Schools, Churches, Public Buildings, Rec. Areas Multi-Family 15% Estimated Land Use Composition Property Type % Used For Type Single-Family Residential 50% Social Forces An analysis of the PMA demographics relative to the U.S. will yield insight into the nature of the PMA. All of the data in this section is obtained from Esri. Population Growth Population growth figures are shown below: Area 2000 2010 Annual % Change 2000-2010 2018 Annual % Change 2010-2018 2023 Annual % Change 2018-2023 PMA 213,888 213,956 0.00% 225,013 0.63% 234,221 0.81% United States 281,421,906 308,745,538 0.93% 330,088,686 0.84% 343,954,683 0.83% Source: Esri Population Growth Between 2010 and 2018, PMA population growth was less than the national average. The forecasted growth for the PMA is at a rate less than the nation as a whole. 39 Brookdale Castle Hills Household Growth Household growth figures are shown below: Area 2000 2010 Annual % Change 2000-2010 2018 Annual % Change 2010-2018 2023 Annual % Change 2018-2023 PMA 88,286 88,327 0.00% 92,643 0.60% 96,449 0.81% United States 105,480,101 116,716,292 1.02% 124,110,001 0.77% 129,076,036 0.79% Household Growth Source: Esri Between 2010 and 2018, PMA household growth was less than the national average. The forecasted growth for the PMA is at a rate greater than the nation as a whole. Income Levels Pertinent income data are shown below. Area 2018 Median Household Income Income Levels 2018 Average HH Income United States $46,482 $58,100 Source: Esri $72,291 $83,694 PMA Current PMA income levels are lower than the national average. Housing Market Esri reports the housing market statistics shown below: 2018 Owner Occupied Housing Percent Housing Market Statistics Area 2018 Median Housing Value Source: Esri $168,465 United States 63.1% $218,492 PMA 43.5% The U.S. housing market continues to improve from the financial crisis in 2008. The next chart indicates the annual returns of the National, the 10-City Composite, and the 20-City Composite home price indices. As of January 2018, the S&P/Case-Shiller U.S. National Home Price Index, covering all nine U.S. census divisions, recorded a higher year-over-year gain with a 6.2% annual increase in January 2018. The 10-City Composite is up 6.0% compared to last year. The 20-City Composite’s year-over-year gain was 6.3%. The National Index is up 38% from its low point in 2012. 40 Brookdale Castle Hills According to the Zillow’s January 2018 Market Report, U.S. home values increased 6.7% over the past year with a median home value of approximately $207,600. In the short term, home values are expected to grow 3.1% over the next year through January 2019. The subject is located in San Antonio, Texas. The median home value (as determined by Esri) within a 5 mile radius of the subject property is $177,504. The housing market in the PMA is considered to be weaker than average based upon the preceding information. 41 Brookdale Castle Hills Public Services Street Improvements The market area benefits from the following road infrastructure: Interstate Highways - North-South: Interstate 10, Interstate 410, Interstate 35 East-West: Interstate 10 & Interstate, 410 Other Highways - North-South: US 281, SH 537 East-West: SH 16/421 Major City Streets - North-South: San Pedro Avenue, West Avenue, Northwest Military Highway East-West: Basse Road, Hildebrand Avenue Overall, accessibility to and within the PMA is rated as average. Police/Fire Protection Police and fire protection is provided by the City of San Antonio. Schools The area is within the San Antonio School District. Shopping The area is adequately served by a number of shopping centers. Medical The full service hospital nearest the subject is Methodist Texas Hospital. This facility is located 3.8 miles southwest of the subject. This hospital includes 120 beds with services that include emergency care, cardiac care, rehabilitation center, sleep lab, etc. 42 Brookdale Castle Hills Seniors Housing Market Demographics Demographics relevant to the seniors housing market are as follows: 43 Brookdale Castle Hills PMA USA 225,013 330,088,686 234,221 343,954,683 0.81% 0.83% 52,374 85,059,700 52,189 83,511,625 -0.07% -0.37% 23.28% 25.77% 36,604 52,780,182 42,002 62,005,855 2.79% 3.27% 16.27% 15.99% 17,078 21,708,863 19,560 26,009,367 2.75% 3.68% 7.59% 6.58% 6,283 6,636,923 6,457 6,990,583 0.55% 1.04% 2.79% 2.01% $46,482 $58,100 $52,750 $65,469 $46,554 $52,012 $36,193 $33,107 Adult Child (45-64) Population 75 Plus Population 65 Plus Population 2018 Age 75+ Pop. as % of Total Pop. Forecasted Annual Growth, 2018-2023 2018 Population 75+ Forecasted 2023 Population 75+ Forecasted Annual Growth, 2018-2023 2018 Population 65+ Forecasted 2023 Population 65+ 2018 Population 45-64 2018 Age 65+ Pop. as % of Total Pop. Forecasted 2023 Population 45-64 Forecasted Annual Growth, 2018-2023 2018 Age 45-64 Pop. as % of Total Pop. Market Area Characteristics Item Total Population 2018 Population Forecasted Annual Growth, 2018-2023 Forecasted 2023 Population 85 Plus Population 2018 Population 85+ Forecasted 2023 Population 85+ Forecasted Annual Growth, 2018-2023 2018 Age 85+ Pop. as % of Total Pop. Source: Esri Income Levels Median Income Level Age 75+ Median Income Level Age 55 to 64 Median Income Level Age 65 to 74 Median Household Income, All Ages 44 Brookdale Castle Hills -1.00% -0.50% 0.00% 0.50% 1.00% 1.50% 2.00% 2.50% 3.00% 3.50% 4.00% Total 45-64 65+ 75+ 85+F o re ca st A n n u al G ro w th Cohort Comparison of Growth Rate Forecasts PMA USA 0.00% 5.00% 10.00% 15.00% 20.00% 25.00% 30.00% 45-64 65+ 75+ 85+ % o f T o ta l P o p u la tio n Cohort Comparison of Population Composition PMA USA 45 Brookdale Castle Hills 46 Brookdale Castle Hills Overall population growth is forecast to be less than average in the PMA. Growth of persons in the “adult child” age bracket (45 to 64) is forecast to be greater than average, while the percent of total population that is within the 45 to 64 age group is less than average. The percent of total population that is 65+ is greater than average. Forecasted growth for the 65+ cohort is less than average. The percent of total population that is 75+ is greater than average. Forecasted growth for the 75+ cohort is less than average. Lastly, the 85+ population is forecast to grow at a pace less than the national average, while representing a greater than average percent of the total population base of the PMA. Senior income levels are below average. Conclusion The subject’s PMA is concluded to be the area within a 4 mile radius from the site. The primary land use in the area is single-family residential and the area is approximately 95% developed. The PMA is experiencing population growth and has below average income levels. The area is considered to be in a stage of growth. Between 2018 and 2023, the market area is forecast to experience growth in demand for seniors housing at an average rate relative to the nation as a whole. 47 Brookdale Castle Hills Site Description and Analysis Specific site details are as follows: Street Address: 1207 Jackson Keller Road Additional Frontage To: None Site Orientation: Interior Site Primary Access Via: Jackson Keller Road, a moderately traveled roadway with two lanes extending in each direction. Jackson Keller Road is not median divided. There is not a traffic light that facilitates access to the site. Secondary Access Via: None Accessibility Rating: Average Visibility Rating: Poor Total Site Size: 11.76 acres Primary Site Size: 6.76 acres Excess Land: 5 acres Shape: Mostly rectangular Topography: Gently rolling Vegetation Moderate Excess Land Area: Approximately 5 acres Zone: Zone X Panel Number: 48029C0245G, Effective September 29, 2010 Flood Insurance: No Electricity: Public to site Natural Gas: Public to site Water: Public to site Sewage Treatment: Public to site Telephone: Public to site Phase 1 ESA: Not provided Known Hazards: None observed or known Earthquake Zone: Not within earthquake zone Utility Availability - Environmental - Location - Accessibility and Visibility - Physical Characteristics - Flood Zone Information - 48 Brookdale Castle Hills Aerial Photograph (Source: Google Earth) North: Single-Family Residential East: Single-Family Residential South: Jackson Keller Road, then Single-Family Residential West: Single-Family Residential Nuisances or Hazards: None known Access Easements: None known Encroachments: None known Utility Easements: Typical for improved properties to allow for the installation and maintenance of utility lines Other Restrictions: None known Adjacent Properties - Easements and Other Legal Constraints - 49 Brookdale Castle Hills Conclusion The subject’s site contains a total of 11.76 acres, include approximately 5 acres of excess land. In addition, on the excess land there is a structure that was previously utilized as dormitory type housing; however, this structure is currently is poor condition and is not usable. This structure has no contributory value and this building is currently not being utilized. The shape of the site is mostly rectangular, and the topography is gently rolling. Overall, the site is considered to have good functional utility. It is physically suited for a wide range of uses and is well suited for the present use. 50 Brookdale Castle Hills Improvement Description and Analysis Introduction The following definitions of the Seniors Housing Classifications were jointly developed by the American Seniors Housing Association (ASHA) and the National Investment Center (NIC): Active Adult Community: For-sale single-family homes, townhomes, cluster homes and condominiums with no specialized services, restricted to adults at least 55 years of age or older. Rental housing is not included in this category. Residents generally lead an independent lifestyle; projects are not equipped to provide increased care as the individual ages. It may include amenities such as clubhouse, golf course and recreational spaces. Outdoor maintenance is normally included in the monthly homeowner’s association or condominium fee. Senior Apartment Community: Multifamily residential rental properties restricted to adults at least 55 years of age or older. These properties do not have central kitchen facilities and generally do not provide meals to residents, but may offer community rooms, social activities, and other amenities. Independent Living Facility (ILF): Age-restricted multifamily rental properties with central dining facilities that provide residents as part of their monthly fee with access to meals and other services such as housekeeping, linen service, transportation, and social and recreational activities. Such properties do not provide, in a majority of the units, assistance with activities of daily living (ADLs) such as supervision of medication, bathing, dressing, toileting, etc. There are no licensed skilled nursing beds in the property. Assisted Living Facility (ALF): State regulated rental properties that provide the same services as independent living communities listed above, but also provide, in a majority of the units, supportive care from trained employees to residents who are unable to live independently and require assistance with activities of daily living (ADLs) including management of medications, bathing, dressing, toileting, ambulating and eating. These properties may have some skilled nursing beds, but the majority of units are licensed for assisted living. Many of these properties include wings or floors dedicated to residents with Alzheimer’s or other forms of dementia. A property that specializes in the care of residents with Alzheimer’s or other forms of dementia should be considered an assisted living property. Independent and Assisted Living Facility (IALF): Single communities offering both independent and assisted living within the same building or on the same campus. Skilled Nursing Facility (SNF): Licensed daily rate or rental properties that are technically referred to as skilled nursing facilities (SNF) where the majority of individuals require 24- 51 Brookdale Castle Hills hour nursing and/or medical care. In most cases, these properties are licensed for Medicaid and/or Medicare reimbursement. These properties may include a minority of assisted living and/or Alzheimer’s/dementia units. Continuing Care Retirement Communities (CCRCs): Age-restricted properties that include a combination of independent living, assisted living and skilled nursing services (or independent living and skilled nursing) available to residents all on one campus. Resident payment plans vary and include entrance fee, condo/coop and rental programs. The majority of the units are not licensed skilled nursing beds. The following are additional terms that are used in describing seniors housing properties: Licensed beds: The number of beds a facility is licensed to operate by the appropriate state licensing agency. Living units: The number of living units, consisting of one or more rooms, designed to accommodate residents of the facility. Operating beds: The number of beds a facility actually operates. This may be less than the number of licensed beds. Private bed: A bed situated in a room with no other beds/residents. Semi-private bed: A bed situated in a room with one other bed/resident. Ward bed: A bed situated in a room with two or more other nursing beds/residents. Private pay: Refers to a resident whose charges are funded by: personal funds, assistance from relatives or other private individuals or groups, or by long term care insurance. Resident day: A day for which services are rendered and billable, or a day for which a bed or unit is held and billed. For example, if a resident rents and occupies a unit for a full calendar year, that resident would have occupied the bed or unit for 365 resident days. Medicaid: Provides health coverage for people of all ages whose incomes are low. To qualify for Medicaid, an individual, couple, or family must meet income and resource guidelines. Income includes money received each month from Social Security, employment, or other sources. Resources refer to the value of items owned such as cash and savings. Some resources, such as the family home and one car, are not counted in determining Medicaid eligibility. To qualify, individuals must be U.S. citizens, with some exceptions for certain categories of non-citizens. Medicaid pays for basic health services and for some services not covered by Medicare such as medicine, nursing facility care, eye exams, glasses, transportation for medical care, and other medical services. Medicaid is funded and regulated by both federal and state governments. As a result, Medicaid rules are different from state to state. 52 Brookdale Castle Hills Medicaid waiver: Under Section 1915(c) of the Social Security Act, Medicaid law authorizes the Secretary of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services to waive certain Medicaid statutory requirements. These waivers enable States to cover a broad array of home and community-based services (HCBS) for targeted populations as an alternative to institutionalization. Waiver services may be optional State Plan services which either are not covered by a particular State or which enhance the State’s coverage. Waivers may also include services not covered through the State Plan such as respite care, environmental modifications, or family training. Many states have Waiver programs in place to provide for assisted living care. Medicare: A federal health insurance program. Passed in 1965 as Title XVIII of the Social Security Act, Medicare was intended to pay the cost of some health care services in order to ensure access to a basic level of health care for the aged and other eligible persons. Medicare will cover the first 20 days of nursing facility care and will partially pay for the next 80 days for a total benefit not to exceed 100 days. A three-day hospital stay is required to qualify for this benefit. Medicare Part A: Provides payment for post-hospital care in a Medicare certified nursing facility. Medicare (Part A) may provide payment for post-hospital care in a nursing facility for up to 100 days if Medicare coverage requirements (the 5 rules) are met. A resident is entitled to full coverage for the first 20 days. From the 21st day through the 100th day, Medicare pays for all covered services except a daily co-pay amount for which the resident is responsible. That means the resident has to pay the co-pay either with his or her own money or, if eligible, through Medicaid, or through private insurance (i.e. a Medi-Gap policy). A nursing facility resident will not be entitled to any Medicare (Part A) coverage unless he or she is admitted to a nursing facility within 30 days following a 3-day hospital stay. Medicare Certified nursing facilities are reimbursed for providing nursing facilities stays based upon the Prospective Payment System. Medicare Part B: Seniors are required to enroll in Medicare Part B. Medicare Part B pays for doctors' services, outpatient hospital care, and some other medical services that Part A does not cover, such as the services of physical and occupational therapists, and some home health care. Part B helps pay for these covered services and supplies when they are medically necessary. Medicare Prospective Payment System (PPS): Section 4432(a) of the Balanced Budget Act (BBA) of 1997 modified how payment is made for Medicare skilled nursing facility (SNF) services. Effective with cost reporting periods beginning on or after July 1, 1998, SNFs were no longer paid on a reasonable cost basis or through low volume prospectively determined rates, but rather on the basis of a prospective payment system (PPS). The PPS payment rates is adjusted for case mix and geographic variation in wages and covers all costs of 53 Brookdale Castle Hills furnishing covered SNF services (routine, ancillary, and capital-related costs). The amount of reimbursement for each resident is based upon the RUG-III case mix system. RUG-IV: RUG IV is a 66- group model for classifying nursing facility residents into homogenous groups according to common health characteristics and the amount and type of resources they use. Residents are classified based on residents’ clinical conditions, extent of services used, and functional status. The groups are in seven general categories (in general order of costs associated with caring for residents): rehabilitation plus extensive services, extensive services, clinically complex, special care high, special care low, behavioral symptoms and cognitive performance and reduced physical function. Subject Photographs Bird’s Eye Aerial of Subject (Source: Google Earth) 54 Brookdale Castle Hills Front View Street View Looking Southeast Street View Looking Northwest Rear View Side View Signage 55 Brookdale Castle Hills Entry Lobby Dining Room Commercial Kitchen Lounge Area Beauty Salon Activity Room 56 Brookdale Castle Hills Courtyard Typical Hallway Typical Living Room Typical Bedroom Typical Kitchen Area Typical Bathroom 57 Brookdale Castle Hills Unit/Bed Mix and Building Areas The following is a tabulation of the unit/bed mix and building area: Percent of Total GBA 12 4 2 2840.3% 3,408 1,1361.3% 3.8% 10,842 4.5% 12.2% 12.2% 3,992 Unit Type Number of Units 30 26 8 Square Feet Total Square Feet Assisted Living Assisted Living 10,860 Unit Mix and Building Areas Care Type Assisted Living Number of Beds Number of Beds Per Unit 1 417 499 9,44010.6% 12 1 30Studio Memory Care Memory Care Studio Deluxe Alcove One Bedroom Private Private - Shared Bath Assisted Living Memory Care 1 1 1 1 26 8 16590 16 1 362 2 284 284 4 284Semi-Private Total Gross Building Area 44.8%97 - 98Totals 89,140 39,962 Plus Common Areas 55.2% 49,178 The subject is licensed for 160 beds. In many cases, ALFs are licensed for a greater number of beds than the facilities are ever likely to fill. This is due to the fact that most units can be licensed for occupancy by two or more persons, but the majority of residents prefer private occupancy. Our forecasts will be based upon the bed mix shown above, as this mix most accurately reflects the composition of beds with which the subject actually operates. As shown in the preceding table, the subject is configured for 97 units and 98 primary beds. However, the subject also is occupied by second persons who are related to the primary occupant of some units. Currently, the subject has 3 second persons. Thus, our forecast of total operating beds is based upon 3 second persons, as shown below: 3 101 98Number of Beds Configured for Specific Private or Semi-Private Occupancy Total Number of Operating Beds Plus Forecasted Net Number of Second Persons in Unspecified Units Calculation of Operating Beds Payor Types The subject is 100% private pay, accepting no Medicaid or Medicare reimbursement. 58 Brookdale Castle Hills Summary of Construction Components Based on the structural frame and major construction components, the building is classified as a Class D structure of good quality by the Marshall Valuation Service. A summary of the improvements follows. Size and Shape Gross Building Area (Square Feet): 89,140 Number of Buildings: 3 Basement: No Stories: 1 & 2 Building Shape: Rectangular Unit Access: Via fully heated and cooled interior hallways Structure and Exterior Surfaces Foundation: Reinforced concrete slab Wall Frame: Wood/lightweight steel frame Roof Frame: Wood/lightweight steel frame Exterior Walls: Veneer of stone and stucco Roof: Pitched roof with composition shingles Windows and Doors Entry Doors: Wood with glass Other Exterior Doors: Steel Interior Doors: Hollow core wood or Masonite Windows: Aluminum frame, residential style Living Unit Finish and Mechanicals Wall Finish: Gyprock finished with paint and wallpaper Ceiling Finish: Gyprock finished with paint Floor Surfaces: Carpet and tile Bathroom: One bathroom per unit with sink, toilet and walk-in shower Kitchen: Full kitchens, kitchenettes or no kitchen areas Closets: One per resident HVAC: Through wall package units Hot Water: Common boiler 59 Brookdale Castle Hills Common Area Finish and Mechanicals Common Area Room Types: Offices, lounge areas, activity room, commercial kitchen, dining room and library Wall Finish: Gyprock finished with paint and wallpaper Ceiling Finish: Suspended acoustical ceiling with lighting Floor Surfaces: Carpet and tile Bathrooms: Multiple common area bathrooms HVAC: Central Hot Water: Common boiler Elevators: Two Safety and Health Care Fire Protection: Fire sprinkler system with alarms Smoke Protectors: Hard-wired, ceiling-mounted smoke detectors Lighting: Battery-powered, wall mounted emergency lighting Call Systems: Centrally monitored resident call system Care Stations: 3 care stations Security: Exterior door locks, intercom system, etc. Memory Care Security: 17 units are “secure” to prevent residents with memory care issues from wandering outside of the building and designated exterior walking areas. Doors are equipped with keypads for entry and exit. In addition, the facility incorporates other specialized design features. The floor plan is designed to be easy to understand, and colors are selected for their soothing effects on memory care patients. 60 Brookdale Castle Hills Other Improvements Other Structures: Maintenance shed Paving/Parking: Asphalt paved drives and open parking lot with concrete curbs Parking Spaces (#): 54 spaces including 4 handicap spaces Sidewalks: Concrete Landscaping: Native grasses, shrubs, and trees Lawn Irrigation: Automatic underground distribution Signage: Monument sign at front of site FF&E Administrative: Copiers, filing cabinets, desks, chairs, computers, etc. Common Areas: Tables, chairs, couches, artwork, etc. Kitchen: Fully equipped commercial kitchen Housekeeping: Mops, brooms, vacuum cleaners, buckets, carts, etc. Laundry and Linen: Laundry carts, washing machines, dryers, etc. Maintenance: Mowers, weed eaters, blowers, ladders, tools, etc. Commercial Space The subject has a beauty shop that is leased. Intangible Items In addition to the hard assets described herein, the going concern values include the following intangible items: ■ Systems and procedures ■ Referral network ■ Name recognition ■ Management expertise ■ Assembled work force ■ Goodwill Condition The subject is in good overall condition. We noted no significant items of deferred maintenance during our inspection. 61 Brookdale Castle Hills Third Party Reports We did not observe any issues during our inspection and none were identified by ownership. We have not been provided a PCNA to identify critical items in need of repair at the subject property nor were we provided with a copy of a Phase I Environmental Assessment. Effective Age and Remaining Economic Life According to Marshall & Swift, the life expectancy for a Class D, good quality facility of the subject’s use is 50 years, which we consider to be low. To support this, we can look to the implied life assigned to buildings involved in recent transactions. JLL conducted valuations of several large portfolios of seniors housing facilities, including a mix of nursing and assisted living. Important statistics are as follows: ■ Portfolio A had 261 assets in operation. The average age was 36 years. Of the total 261 assets, 22% were already 40 years old. The entire portfolio was leased to an operator for a term of 20 years, implying a life of at least 56 years (36-year average + 20-year lease). ■ Portfolio B had 336 assets with an average age of 24 years. The portfolio was leased for a maximum term of 22 years, implying a life of at least 46 years. ■ Portfolio C had 19 assets with an average age of 45 years. The portfolio was leased for a maximum term of 20 years, implying a life of at least 65 years. Based upon the preceding, we conclude the total economic life for the subject to be 55 years. The subject was built in 2000, thus the actual chronological age is 18 years. The subject has not been updated. The level of maintenance received appears to have been average. We have concluded the effective age of the subject to be 12 years. Therefore, the concluded remaining economic life for the subject is 43 years (55 years less 12 years). Functional Utility The subject’s functional utility is rated as follows: Median Number of Units/Beds (114 units for IL ; 167 units for IALF; 149 units for IALF/ALZ; 64 units for AL; 90 units for AL/ALZ; and 296 units for CCRC) Median Common Area Percentage (32.0% for IL; 32.9% for IALF; 37.4% for IALF/ALZ; 45.4% for AL; 46.8% for AL/ALZ; and 24.1% for CCRC) Unit Layout Good Common Area Layout Good Overall Functional Utility Good Medians from State of Seniors Housing 2017 Greater than Typical Subject’s Functional Utility Average Overall, the subject is similar to the typical facility and has good functional utility. 62 Brookdale Castle Hills Conclusion The subject offers assisted living and memory care, with a total of 97 units and 101 operating beds. The improvements contain a total of 89,140 square feet. Its construction quality is rated as good. The subject’s amenities are considered similar to the competing properties in the market. Overall, the subject’s appeal to the market is considered average. 63 Brookdale Castle Hills Legal Constraints Analysis Zoning According to the city of San Antonio, the subject is currently zoned C. A description of the zoning classification is presented below: Department and Telephone Number: Planning Department at 210-342-2341 Zoning Classification: C (Low Rise Apartment) and a small portion along the east side of the site )100 feet wide) is zoned B (Duplex) Permitted Uses: Multi-family residential and retirement facilities Zoning Compliance: The subject is a legal, conforming use Maximum Height: 2 stories Maximum Site Coverage: 33% Setbacks- Front: 25 feet Rear: 20 feet Side: 10 feet or 15 feet if adjacent to another residential district Deed Restrictions We have assumed that the subject is not affected by any adverse deed restrictions. However, this is a legal matter, and an attorney should be consulted for verification of this assumption. 64 Brookdale Castle Hills Licensing Requirements Assisted living is subject to some level of regulation in every state in the nation. The following summarizes the regulations in the state of Texas. License Terms Assisted Living Facilities: The Texas Department of Aging and Disability Services (DADS) licenses several types of assisted living facilities (ALFs): assisted living apartments (single-occupancy), residential care apartments (double-occupancy), and residential care non-apartments. A person establishing or operating a facility that is not required to be licensed may not use the term "assisted living" in referring to the facility or the services provided. The ALF statute requires careful monitoring to detect and report unlicensed facilities. A facility's licensure type--A or B--is based on residents' capability to evacuate the facility. Any facility that advertises, markets, or otherwise promotes itself as providing specialized care for persons with Alzheimer's disease or other disorders must be certified as such and have a Type B license. Adult foster care (AFC) provides a 24-hour living arrangement with supervision in an adult foster home for people who are unable to live independently in their own homes because of physical, mental, or emotional limitations. Providers and residents must live in the same household and share a common living area. With the exception of family members, no more than three adults may live in the foster home unless it is licensed as a Type C ALF, which is a four-bed facility that must have an active contract with the Department to provide AFC services before it can be licensed. A provider wishing to serve more than four individuals must obtain a DADS Type A ALF license. Separate rules apply to adult foster homes and Type C facilities, which are not included in this profile, but a link to the provisions can found at the end. This profile includes summaries of selected regulatory provisions for Type A and Type B ALFs. The complete regulations are online at the links provided at the end. Definitions Assisted living facility means an establishment that furnishes, in one or more facilities, food and shelter to four or more persons who are unrelated to the proprietor and provides personal care services, supervision or direct administration of medications, and other permitted services. Resident Agreements Facilities must have a written admission agreement with each resident that includes information about the services to be provided and their cost. 65 Brookdale Castle Hills Disclosures The facility must have written policies regarding aging in place, admission criteria, services provided, charges, refunds, the normal 24-hour staffing pattern, residents' responsibilities and privileges, and other rules and regulations. Before admitting a resident, facility staff must explain and provide a copy of the disclosure statement to the resident, family, or responsible party and must also provide a copy of the Resident Bill of Rights. An ALF that provides brain injury rehabilitation services must attach to its disclosure statement a specific statement that licensure as an ALF does not indicate state review, approval, or endorsement of the facility's rehabilitative services. The facility must document receipt of the disclosure statement. If the facility provides services and supplies that could be covered Medicare benefits, the facility must disclose this information to the resident. Facilities that provide care to residents with Alzheimer's disease or other dementias are required to disclose the services they provide using a DADS disclosure form, which includes the pre-admission and admission processes, discharge and transfer, planning and implementation of care, change in condition issues, staffing and staff training in dementia care, and the physical environment. The facility must give the required DADS disclosure statement to any individual seeking information about the facility's care or treatment of residents with Alzheimer's disease or other dementias. The disclosure statement must be updated and submitted to the Department as needed to reflect changes in special services for residents. Prior to admitting a resident to the facility, staff must discuss and explain the information in the disclosure statement with the family or responsible party. Admissions In a Type A ALF, a resident must be mentally and physically capable of evacuating the facility unassisted in the event of an emergency and capable of following directions, and must not require routine attendance during sleeping hours. In a Type B ALF, a resident may require staff assistance to evacuate the facility, be incapable of following directions under emergency conditions, require attendance during sleeping hours, and may not be permanently bedfast but may require assistance in transferring to and from bed. All residents must be appropriate for the facility licensure type when admitted. After admission, if the resident's condition changes, the resident may no longer be appropriate for the facility's license, and if so, the facility is not required to retain them. The regulations list some general characteristics of residents in an ALF, including residents who: (1) exhibit symptoms of mental or emotional disturbance, but are not considered at risk of imminent harm to self or others; (2) need assistance with mobility, bathing, dressing, and grooming; (3) need 66 Brookdale Castle Hills reminders to encourage toilet routine and prevent incontinence; (4) need assistance with medication, supervision of self-medication, or administration of medication; or (5) are incontinent without pressure sores. A facility must not admit or retain a resident whose needs cannot be met by the facility or who cannot secure the necessary services from an outside resource. As part of the facility's general supervision and oversight of the physical and mental well-being of its residents, the facility remains responsible for all care provided in the facility. If the individual is appropriate for placement in a facility, then the decision that additional services are necessary and can be secured is the responsibility of facility management with written concurrence of the resident, resident's attending physician, or legal representative. If the Department or an ALF determines that a resident is inappropriately placed in the facility, or if a resident experiences a change of condition, but continues to meet the facility evacuation criteria, as long as the facility is willing the resident may be retained if certain conditions are met, including: (1) a physician describes the resident's medical conditions and related nursing needs, ambulatory and transfer abilities, and mental status, and states that the resident is appropriately placed; and (2) the resident or a legal representative desires retention in the facility. If the DADS surveyor or an ALF determines that a resident is inappropriately placed because the resident no longer meets the evacuation criteria, a facility may request that the resident remain at the facility by obtaining an evacuation waiver and providing a detailed emergency plan that explains how the facility will meet the evacuation needs of the resident, which includes provisions for a sufficient number of trained staff on all shifts to move all residents to a place of safety. The facility must meet the previously listed conditions and submit additional information. Services ALFs provide personal care, including assistance with activities of daily living (ADLs); general supervision or oversight of the physical and mental well-being of a person who needs assistance to maintain a private and independent residence in the facility or who needs assistance to manage his or her personal life; and supervision or direct administration of medications. The facility must also provide an activity and/or social program for residents at least weekly. An ALF may provide skilled nursing services for limited purposes: (1) coordinating resident care with an outside home and community support services agency or health care professional; (2) providing or delegating personal care services and medication administration; (3) assessing residents to determine required services; and (4) delivering, for a period not to exceed 30 days, temporary skilled nursing services for a minor illness, injury or emergency. Facilities that provide care to residents with Alzheimer's disease or other dementias must encourage socialization, cognitive awareness, self-expression, and physical activity in a planned and structured activities program. Activities must be individualized, based upon the resident 67 Brookdale Castle Hills assessment, and appropriate for each resident's abilities. Residents must be encouraged, but never forced, to participate in activities. Residents who choose not to participate in a large group activity must be offered at least one small group or one-on-one activity per day. A health care professional may coordinate the provision of services to a resident within the professional's scope of practice authorized by the Texas Health and Safety Code, however, a facility must not provide ongoing services to a resident that are comparable to the services available in a licensed nursing facility. Service Planning Within 14 days of admission, the facility must conduct a comprehensive assessment and complete an individualized service plan (ISP). The comprehensive assessment must be completed by the appropriate staff and documented on a form developed by the facility. Facilities that provide care to residents with Alzheimer's disease or other dementias must establish procedures, such as an application process, interviews, and home visits, to ensure that prospective residents are appropriate and their needs can be met. Within 14 days of admission, the facility must comprehensively assess the resident and develop an ISP. The service plan must address the residents' individual needs, preferences, and strengths and be designed to help the resident maintain the highest possible level of physical, cognitive, and social functioning. The service plan must be updated annually and upon a significant change in condition. Third-Party Providers A resident may contract with a licensed home and community support services agency or with an independent health professional to have health care services delivered at the facility. Medications Residents who self-administer their own medications and keep them locked in their room must be counseled at least once a month by facility staff to ascertain if they continue to be capable of self- administering their medications/treatments and if security of medications can continue to be maintained. Supervision of a resident's medication regimen by facility staff may be provided to residents who are incapable of self-administering without assistance. Supervision includes and is limited to: reminders to take medications at the prescribed time, opening containers or packages and replacing lids, pouring prescribed dosage according to the resident's medication profile record, returning medications to the proper locked areas, obtaining medications from a pharmacy, and listing the medication taken on a resident's medication profile record. Residents who choose not to or cannot self-administer medication must have medication administered by a person who: (1) holds a current license to administer medication; (2) holds a current medication aide permit (this person must function under the direct supervision of a licensed nurse on duty or on call); or (3) is an employee of the facility to whom the administration of 68 Brookdale Castle Hills medication has been delegated by a registered nurse who has trained them to administer medications or verified their training, according to rules in the state's Nursing Practice Act. Food Service Facilities must provide at least three balanced and nutritious meals or the equivalent per day. The meals must be served daily, at regular times, with no more than a 16-hour span between a substantial evening meal and breakfast the following morning. All exceptions must be specifically approved by the Department. Menus must be prepared to provide a balanced and nutritious diet, such as that recommended by the National Food and Nutrition Board. Therapeutic diets as ordered by the resident's physician must be provided according to the service plan. Therapeutic diets that cannot customarily be prepared by a layperson must be calculated by a qualified dietician. Therapeutic diets that can customarily be prepared by a person in a family setting may be served by the ALF. Staffing Type of Staff. Each facility must have a manager who is on duty 40 hours per week and may manage only one facility, except for managers of small Type A facilities, who may have responsibility for no more than 16 residents in no more than four facilities. The managers of small Type A facilities must be available by telephone or pager when conducting facility business off-site. An employee competent and authorized to act in the absence of the manager must be designated in writing. An attendant (direct care staff person) must be in the facility at all times when residents are present. Attendants are not precluded from performing other functions as required by the ALF. Staff Ratios. No minimum ratios. A facility must develop and implement staffing policies that require staffing ratios based upon residents' needs as identified in their ISPs. A facility must have sufficient staff to: (1) maintain order, safety, and cleanliness; (2) assist with medication regimens; (3) prepare and serve meals that meet requirements; (4) assist with laundry; (5) ensure that each resident receives the kind and amount of supervision and care required to meet his/her basic needs; and (6) ensure safe evacuation of the facility in the event of an emergency. In Type A facilities night shift staff in a small facility must be immediately available and in a large facility, they must be immediately available and awake. In Type B facilities, night shift staff must be immediately available and awake, regardless of the number of licensed beds. Training All managers must complete a 24-hour course which must include information on the assisted living standards; resident characteristics (including dementia); resident assessment; skills for working with residents; basic principles of management; food and nutrition services; federal laws, such as the Americans With Disabilities Act (ADA), Civil Rights Act of 1991, the Rehabilitation Act of 1993, 69 Brookdale Castle Hills Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993, and the Fair Housing Act, with an emphasis on the ADA's accessibility requirements; community resources; ethics; and financial management. All managers must have 12 hours of annual continuing education in at least two of the following areas: resident and provider rights and responsibilities, abuse/neglect, and confidentiality; principles of management; skills for working with residents, families, and other professional providers; resident characteristics and needs; community resources; accounting and budgeting; basic emergency first-aid; and federal laws as listed above. All staff must receive 4 hours of orientation before assuming any job responsibilities, covering topics at a minimum: reporting abuse and neglect, confidentiality of resident information, universal precautions, conditions that require notification to the manager, resident rights, and emergency and evacuation procedures. Attendants (direct care staff) must also complete 16 hours of on-the-job training and supervision on a range of topics, including: (1) providing assistance with ADLs; (2) resident health conditions and how they affect the provision of tasks; (3) safety measures to prevent injury and accidents; (4) emergency first-aid procedures and actions to take when a resident falls, suffers a laceration, or experiences a sudden change in physical and/or mental status; (5) behavior management, for example, prevention of aggressive behavior and de-escalation techniques, practices to decrease the frequency of the use of restraint, and alternatives to restraints; and (6) fall prevention. Attendants must complete 6 hours of education annually, including 1 hour on fall prevention and 1 hour on behavior management, as described above, and a range of other topics suggested by the regulations, including: (1) promoting resident dignity, independence, individuality, privacy, and choice; (2) resident rights and principles of self-determination; (3) communication techniques for working with residents with hearing, visual, or cognitive impairment; (4) communicating with families and other persons interested in the resident; (5) common physical, psychological, social, and emotional conditions and how these conditions affect residents' care; (6) essential facts about common physical and mental disorders, for example, arthritis, cancer, dementia, depression, heart and lung diseases, sensory problems, or stroke; (7) cardiopulmonary resuscitation; (8) common medications and side effects, including psychotropic medications, when appropriate; (9) understanding mental illness; (10) conflict resolution and de-escalation techniques; and (11) information regarding community resources. Subject matter must address the unique needs of the facility. Facilities that employ licensed nurses, certified nurse aides, or certified medication aides must provide annual in-service training, appropriate to their job responsibilities, on one or more of several suggested topics, including: (1) communication techniques and skills useful when providing geriatric care (e.g., skills for communicating with the hearing impaired, visually impaired and cognitively impaired; therapeutic touch; recognizing communication that indicates psychological abuse); (2) assessment and interventions related to the common physical and psychological 70 Brookdale Castle Hills changes of aging for each body system; (3) geriatric pharmacology, including treatment for pain management, food and drug interactions, and sleep disorders; (4) common emergencies of geriatric residents and how to prevent them (e.g., falls, choking on food or medicines, injuries from restraint use); (5) how to recognize sudden changes in physical condition, such as stroke or heart attack, and obtain emergency treatment; (6) common mental disorders with related nursing implications; and (7) ethical and legal issues regarding advance directives, abuse and neglect, guardianship, and confidentiality. Apartment Provisions The licensing rules do not require private units but some types of facilities provide them. In facilities that do not provide private units, a maximum of four people may share a room, and not more than 50 percent of the beds in a facility may be in rooms with more than two residents. One toilet and one sink are required for every six residents and one tub or shower for every ten residents. A minimum of one toilet, sink, and bathing unit must be provided on each sleeping floor accessible to residents of that floor. The Medicaid STAR+PLUS home and community-based services (HCBS) waiver program pays for services in three types of settings: single-occupancy assisted living apartments, residential care apartments, and residential care non-apartment settings. An assisted living apartment setting is an apartment for single-occupancy that is a private space with individual living and sleeping areas, a kitchen, a bathroom, and adequate storage space. Double-occupancy units may be provided if requested. Residential care apartments are units with two bedrooms, each with a single occupant, with a shared kitchen and bathroom. Kitchens must be equipped with a sink, refrigerator, cooking appliance (stove, microwave, built-in surface unit) that can be removed or disconnected, and space for food preparation. A residential care non-apartment setting is defined as a licensed ALF with 16 or fewer beds, with living units that do not meet the definition of either an assisted living apartment or a residential care apartment. Most have dual-occupancy rooms but some have rooms with up to four residents. Dementia Provisions Dementia Care Staff. Facilities must have a manager or supervisor. Facilities with 17 or more residents must have an activity director 20 hours a week. Smaller facilities may designate a person to plan and implement activities. A facility must employ sufficient staff to provide services for and meet the needs of its residents with dementia. In large facilities or units with 17 or more residents, two staff members must be immediately available whenever residents are present. 71 Brookdale Castle Hills Dementia Staff Training. All staff in Alzheimer's facilities must receive 4 hours of dementia-specific orientation prior to assuming job responsibilities, providing basic information about the causes, progression, and management of dementia. Direct care staff must receive 16 hours of on-the-job supervision and training within the first 16 hours of employment following orientation. Training must cover providing assistance with ADLs; emergency and evacuation procedures specific to the dementia population; behavior management, including prevention of aggressive behavior and de-escalation techniques; and fall prevention. Direct care staff must complete12 hours annually of in-service, competency-based training regarding Alzheimer's disease, 1 hour of which must address behavior management, as described above. Additional suggested topics include: (1) assessing resident capabilities and developing and implementing service plans; (2) promoting resident dignity, independence, individuality, privacy and choice; (3) planning and facilitating activities appropriate for the dementia resident; (4) communicating with families and other persons interested in the resident; (5) resident rights and principles of self-determination; (6) care of elderly persons with physical, cognitive, behavioral and social disabilities; (7) medical and social needs of the residents; (8) common psychotropic medications and side effects; and (9) local community resources. Managers or supervisors and activity directors or their designees must annually complete 6 hours of continuing education regarding dementia care. Dementia Facility Requirements. A monitoring station must be provided within the dementia care unit as well as access to at least two approved exits remote from each other. The outdoor area of at least 800 square feet must be provided in at least one contiguous space. This area must be connected to, be a part of, be controlled by, and be directly accessible from the facility. Locking devices may be used on control doors provided criteria specifically stated in the rules are met for their use. Background Checks An ALF must keep current and complete personnel records on facility employees for review by DADS staff, including documentation that the facility performed a criminal history check (offenses which preclude employment are listed in statute), an annual employee misconduct registry check, and an annual nurse aide registry check. Monitoring To be licensed, a facility must pass an on-site life safety code inspection and a separate on-site health inspection. Licenses are renewed every 2 years, for which an on-site inspection is required, which must include observation of the care of a resident. The Department developed a training program to provide specialized training to DADS employees who inspect ALFs. The training emphasizes the distinction between an ALF and a nursing facility. 72 Brookdale Castle Hills License According to management, the subject’s license is currently in force. We are aware of no pending actions that would result in the revocation of the subject’s license. Potential Changes in the Regulatory Environment We are aware of no pending changes in the regulatory environment in the state of Texas that would negatively impact the subject. Conclusion The subject’s use represents a legal use under the current site zoning. Furthermore, the subject is licensed by the state of Texas and the license is currently in good standing. We are aware of no pending changes in the regulatory environment in the state of Texas that would negatively impact the subject. 73 Brookdale Castle Hills Ad Valorem Tax Analysis Tax Rate The subject is under the taxing jurisdiction of Bexar County and related entities, the San Antonio School District, and the City of San Antonio. For the pro forma, taxes will be forecast for the 12 months following the date of value. For purposes of forecasting taxes for that period, the aggregate tax rate is forecast as follows. x = x =2.6131 2.6131 Forecast Tax Rate Forecast Tax Rate 0.00% 2017 Forecast Rate Change Current Assessed Value $11,886 $12.93 Subject's Current Market Value Assessment Item Assessor's Estimate of Market Value Land MV Assessment Per Unit $1,152,990 $7,185,780 $441,580 Total $74,080 Current MV Assessment Per Square Foot of Building $4,552 $98.50 $4.95 $80.61 $90,519$8,780,350 FF&E Improvements The assessor’s estimate of market value is shown above. The subject’s account number is 05682- 000-0490. In this jurisdiction, property is assessed at 100% of the assessor’s estimated market value and is reassessed on an annual basis. Also, in this jurisdiction, sale of a property does not trigger an automatic reassessment the following year. Texas is a non-disclosure state with a mandate to assess property at 100% of market value. Some Texas county assessors are more successful at achieving the mandate than others. In Texas counties with little or no transaction activity, values can lag the market. However, there is no limit on increases in the event of a reassessment. Property owners in Texas may protest ad valorem assessments using one of two tests: 1) Market Value or 2) Equal Appraisal. Market Value is self- explanatory. Equal appraisal means there is a burden on the district’s assessor to ensure mass appraisal methods produce consistent results from property to property. To measure equality, the appraisal review board will consider the assessed values of competing properties in the district. The assessor’s estimate of market value is well below our estimate of value. This is a common situation as few assessors have the knowledge, expertise or training to accurately value seniors 74 Brookdale Castle Hills housing properties. Further, part of the value of a well performing seniors housing property is intangible business value, which is not subject to ad valorem taxation. As underassessments are typical, another means for evaluating an assessed value is to compare assessed values for similar properties in the same, or nearby, assessment district. $7,500,000 227 173,089 $62,334 $109.52 $89.53$70,323 $14,149,9301982 119 $78,592 93,470 $81.75 Averages for Comparables (Excludes Subject) 1997 $8,368,480 Brookdale Hamilton Wolfe $13,923,150 $8,000,000 New Forest Estates Brookdale N. Fredericksburg Road $7,630,760 Property Name $103,11874 48,515 89,140 $157.29$130,760 $226,780 $368,480 1996 MV Per Square Foot Tax Assessment Comparables Sq. Ft. $98.50$90,51997$8,780,3502000 MV Per UnitUnitsTotal $8,338,770 $441,580 FF&E Subject Assessor's Estimate of Market Value Real EstateYOC Based upon the preceding, the subject’s assessment is considered fair and equitable. Special Assessments Our investigation discovered no special assessments that will affect the subject. Texas Franchise Tax The State of Texas Net Franchise Tax is a privilege tax imposed on corporations, limited liability companies, and partnerships, among other entities, that are chartered in Texas. Corporations pay the greater of the tax on net taxable capital or net taxable earned surplus. Taxable capital is apportioned using a single gross receipts factor. Taxable capital for an annual report is based on the end of the corporation’s last accounting period in the calendar year prior to the calendar year in which the report is due. The tax rate on taxable capital is 0.25% per year of privilege period. A corporation’s first (initial) report is due one year and 89 days after the corporation’s beginning date. After the initial report is filed, the corporation will file annual reports each May 15. According to the Texas Tax Code (171-1011), a health care provider may exclude 100% of revenues from Medicaid and Medicare, which limits the subject’s gross revenue to that derived from the private pay residents. This revenue is shown in the following table based on our income estimate that follows. 75 Brookdale Castle Hills House Bill 32 relating to the Texas Franchise tax was signed into law on June 15, 2015. As of January 1, 2016, the Texas Franchise tax changed. The major changes were as follows: ■ Decrease the franchise tax rate from 1.00% to 0.75% ■ Decrease the franchise tax on retailers or wholesalers from 0.50% to 0.375% ■ A taxable entity with no more than $20 million in total revenue, up from $10 million, could choose to pay the franchise tax under the E-Z computation and rate provisions ■ Decrease the tax rate under the EZ computation from 0.575% to 0.331% As a property with less than $20 million in annual revenue, the E-Z compensation method may be used in estimating the subject’s franchise tax liability. Note that the apportionment factor is 100%, since all of the subject gross receipts are derived in Texas. Resulting Franchise Tax $10,856 Resulting Margin $1,990,082 Taxable Due Before Discounts (0.75%) on Resulting Margin $14,926 Minus Wages and Benefits ($1,289,759) Tax For Revenue of $20,000,000 or Less (.331% x Revenue) $10,856 Total Revenue $1,990,082 Compensation Deduction For Service Provider (70%) $2,295,889 Net Franchise Tax Estimate Total Revenue - Year 1 $3,279,841 Total Taxes Total real estate taxes (excluding FF&E) that will be payable in the 12 month period following the date of valuation are as follows. X = / = X = X Taxable Value Percent = Taxable Value 100% 83,388 =Subtotal Tax Rate Real Estate Pro Forma Year Tax Estimate Real Estate Market Value / X Total Taxes$100 = $2.61$8,338,770 $100$8,338,770 $217,902 Total FF&E taxes that will be payable in the 12 month period following the date of valuation are as follows. X = / = X =4,416 $2.61 Total Taxes Taxable Value $100 = X= $441,580 100% $11,539 = Tax Rate $441,580 Taxable Value Percent FF&E Market Value X Subtotal/ FF&E Pro Forma Year Tax Estimate $100 Total taxes are summarized as follows. 76 Brookdale Castle Hills Texas Franchise Tax Pro Forma Year Tax Estimate Summary FF&E Real Estate $240,297 $0 $11,539 $217,902 $10,856 Total Tax Summary Special Assessments/Other 77 Brookdale Castle Hills Seniors Housing Market Analysis Aging Trends There is no denying that the demographic trends impacting the seniors housing sector are positive. As of the 2010 Census, there were 40.3 million elderly Americans (those aged 65 and older), making up nearly 13% of the total population. The elderly population is expected to almost double by the year 2030 to 72 million, to make up 19% of the total population. The 2010 Census also indicated that there were 5.5 million Americans aged 85 and older, almost 2% of the total population. This population is expected to almost double by 2030 and become 2.3% of the total population. In 2050, as many as one in five Americans could be elderly. Much of the forecast growth will occur between 2010 and 2030, due to the Baby Boomer generation entering their elderly years. This is most apparent when comparing growth rates. Between 2010 and 2030, the overall U.S. population is forecast to grow at an annual pace of 0.9% per year. Remarkably, growth in all three seniors sectors is much stronger: 3.0% per year for the 65+ population, 2.9% per year for the 75+ population, and 2.1% per year for the 85+ population. These strong rates of growth will lead to growing demand for seniors housing. Forecast Population Growth 0 50,000 100,000 150,000 200,000 250,000 300,000 350,000 400,000 450,000 500,000 2010 2015 2020 2025 2030 2035 2040 2045 2050 Year Po pu la ti on (T ho us an ds ) 85+ 75 to 84 65 to 74 45 to 64 20 to 44 Under 20 78 Brookdale Castle Hills Other Factors Leading to Increased Demand In addition to demographic trends, the following factors are leading to increasing demand for seniors housing and long-term care: ● Need for assistance with ADLs. According to census figures, about 6.5 million seniors need assistance with ADLs. As the number of seniors continues to increase, that number is expected to double by 2020. ● More elderly living alone. Women continue to outlive men, and the likelihood that either men or women will live alone increases with age. Societal factors, such as rising divorce rates and the growing numbers of people choosing not to marry, also contribute to this trend. ● Changes in the role of women. Women have traditionally been the primary caregivers of older people. However, the number of women in the work force grew from 20.5% in 1915 to more than 58% in 2010. With this change, fewer women are serving as caregivers, creating the need for the elderly to seek assistance outside the home. Elderly Population - Percent of Total 0.0% 5.0% 10.0% 15.0% 20.0% 25.0% 2010 2015 2020 2025 2030 2035 2040 2045 2050 Year 65+ 75+ 85+ 79 Brookdale Castle Hills National Senior Housing Supply Trends Senior apartments and independent living supply is typically expressed in terms of units, while assisted and nursing supply is expressed in terms of beds. NIC MAP estimated there were 14,105 seniors housing properties consisting of 1,810,824 units/beds in the primary and secondary markets of the U.S. as of the 1st quarter 2018, as shown below. 1,394 4,506 718 6,278 1,209 - 1,000 2,000 3,000 4,000 5,000 6,000 7,000 Independent Living Assisted Living Memory Care Nursing Care CCRC Pr op er ti es Seniors Housing Supply 407,812 383,237 122,751 897,024 - 100,000 200,000 300,000 400,000 500,000 600,000 700,000 800,000 900,000 1,000,000 Independent Living Assisted Living Memory Care Nursing Care U ni ts /B ed s Seniors Housing Supply 80 Brookdale Castle Hills New Development According to NIC Map Construction Monitor for the 1st quarter of 2018, national construction start activity (not including senior apartments) was as follows. There were 519 seniors housing properties under construction as of the 1st quarter of 2018. The majority of the construction was within new properties, with construction in these properties totaling 48,940 units spread across 376 properties. In addition, there were also 143 existing properties undergoing expansions, totaling 8,499 units. National Demand Trends As noted previously, demographic trends will lead to growing demand for seniors housing over the coming years. Most industry analysts agree that the level of assisted and independent living units that are supportable is not yet known. As the public becomes more educated as to seniors housing options, an increasing percentage of seniors may elect to occupy some form of seniors housing. To date the most comprehensive estimate of demand for seniors housing was published in The Case for Investing in Seniors Housing and Long Term Care Properties with Updated Projections. The study, conducted by NIC in partnership with Price Waterhouse, LLP, produced the following base case estimates of effective demand for seniors housing. 18,000 18,000 15,000 21,000 14,603 14,942 19,765 23,469 33,743 30,539 45,713 43,408 61,367 57,439 - 10,000 20,000 30,000 40,000 50,000 60,000 70,000 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 1Q2018 U ni ts Construction Start Activity 81 Brookdale Castle Hills Community Age Seniors Housing The majority of independent living communities now in existence were developed since 2000. Another large share of the total was developed in the 1980s. This is in contrast to nursing care, which has experienced relatively constant development for a number of decades, and assisted living, most of which was developed in the 1990s. Revised Base Case Demand (Including Public Pay Demand for Assisted and Nursing) - 500,000 1,000,000 1,500,000 2,000,000 2,500,000 3,000,000 3,500,000 2000 2010 2020 2030 Year Independent Living Assisted Living Skilled Nursing 82 Brookdale Castle Hills Source: The State of Seniors Housing 2017, ASHA Occupancy The table on the following page shows the occupancy performance by region compared to a year ago from the National Investment Center for Seniors Housing & Care (NIC). 83 Brookdale Castle Hills 1Q17 1Q18 1Q17 1Q18 1Q17 1Q18 1Q17 1Q18 1Q17 1Q18 Independent Living1 90.9% 90.3% 91.6% 91.1% 3.2% 1.9% 2.2% 2.3% 2.0% 1.6% East North Central 91.0% 90.0% 91.4% 90.8% 4.5% 0.6% 0.8% 2.0% 1.3% 0.9% Mid-Atlantic 92.7% 92.4% 93.2% 92.9% 3.3% 2.7% 2.1% 2.5% 2.4% 2.1% Mountain 89.0% 89.1% 89.9% 89.8% 3.9% 1.6% 2.3% 0.6% 2.3% 0.7% Northeast 92.2% 92.0% 92.5% 92.5% 2.2% 2.4% 2.0% 1.4% 1.8% 1.3% Pacific 92.1% 92.2% 92.3% 92.4% 3.2% 4.0% 1.2% 1.0% 1.0% 1.1% Southeast 89.9% 88.5% 90.9% 89.8% 2.9% 1.7% 2.2% 3.7% 2.2% 2.1% Southwest 86.8% 85.6% 89.2% 87.5% 2.2% -0.2% 6.1% 4.8% 3.6% 3.3% West North Central 91.3% 90.6% 92.0% 91.4% 3.8% 1.6% 2.6% 2.5% 2.0% 1.8% Assisted Living1 86.5% 85.6% 89.1% 87.9% 2.8% 2.6% 4.8% 4.6% 3.0% 3.4% East North Central 85.2% 83.5% 88.5% 86.8% 2.7% 1.7% 6.6% 7.4% 4.2% 5.3% Mid-Atlantic 86.1% 84.4% 88.5% 86.6% 2.6% 2.4% 4.2% 5.1% 1.1% 2.9% Mountain 85.7% 82.5% 88.2% 85.8% 2.8% 1.7% 4.9% 8.7% 3.9% 4.7% Northeast 88.8% 88.5% 90.4% 90.3% 2.5% 2.6% 3.1% 1.9% 2.3% 1.6% Pacific 89.3% 89.4% 90.7% 90.1% 4.5% 4.0% 2.8% 1.2% 1.3% 1.3% Southeast 84.5% 84.8% 87.7% 87.2% 1.6% 2.3% 6.6% 3.9% 4.1% 4.3% Southwest 81.9% 79.6% 85.7% 82.4% 2.5% 2.0% 6.4% 8.0% 6.2% 5.0% West North Central 86.2% 85.1% 89.5% 88.6% 2.9% 2.6% 7.0% 8.5% 4.0% 7.2% Nursing Care1 86.9% 86.3% 87.2% 86.5% 2.8% 2.3% -0.1% -0.4% -0.5% -1.2% East North Central 84.1% 83.5% 84.3% 83.7% 2.9% 2.4% 0.0% -1.0% -0.2% -1.7% Mid-Atlantic 89.2% 88.5% 89.2% 88.6% 3.3% 2.6% 0.2% 0.0% -0.2% -0.7% Mountain 81.9% 81.7% 82.6% 82.4% 2.3% 2.3% 1.6% 0.3% 0.5% 0.1% Northeast 91.2% 90.8% 91.3% 90.8% 2.3% 2.0% -0.5% -0.7% -0.8% -1.2% Pacific 90.1% 89.2% 90.1% 89.4% 3.7% 3.4% -0.2% 0.2% -0.9% -0.7% Southeast 88.9% 88.4% 89.0% 88.5% 2.9% 2.0% -0.3% -0.2% -0.8% -0.7% Southwest 77.0% 76.2% 77.6% 76.6% 2.4% 1.7% 1.1% -0.2% 1.4% -1.2% West North Central 82.2% 80.8% 82.5% 81.0% 3.7% 2.8% -0.6% -0.3% -2.0% -2.0% CCRCs1 91.1% 91.0% 91.2% 91.1% 3.6% 2.8% 1.0% 0.7% 1.3% 0.6% East North Central 90.0% 90.2% 90.1% 90.2% 7.1% 1.7% 0.7% -0.2% 0.7% 0.0% Mid-Atlantic 93.6% 93.5% 93.8% 93.8% 3.8% 2.9% 1.1% 2.0% 1.8% 2.0% Mountain 84.9% 86.2% 85.4% 86.6% 4.3% 1.8% 2.0% -0.8% 3.1% 0.8% Northeast 92.6% 92.9% 92.6% 92.9% 2.4% 3.3% 1.1% 0.5% 1.3% 0.8% Pacific 92.1% 91.9% 92.1% 92.2% 2.0% 4.8% 0.7% 1.3% 0.5% 1.0% Southeast 91.0% 90.2% 91.0% 90.2% 3.7% 2.9% 0.4% 0.8% 1.6% 0.0% Southwest 88.2% 86.9% 88.2% 86.9% 2.2% 1.1% 2.3% 1.2% 2.3% -0.4% West North Central 90.2% 89.6% 90.3% 89.6% 3.3% 2.2% 1.2% 1.7% 0.5% 1.0% 1. Represents aggregate property type data for all markets. Performance by Region Current Quarter vs. One Year Ago Occupancy (%) Stabilized Occupancy (%) Annual Rent Growth (%) Annual Inventory Growth (%) Annual Absorption (%) 84 Brookdale Castle Hills The preceding table represents aggregate property type data collected from the NICMAP 99 markets (primary and secondary market aggregate), as shown below: East North Central: Includes Akron, OH; Chicago, IL; Cincinnati, OH; Cleveland, OH; Columbus, OH; Dayton, OH; Detroit, MI; Grand Rapids, MI; Indianapolis, IN; Madison, WI; Milwaukee, WI; Toledo, OH; and Youngstown, OH. Mid-Atlantic: Includes Baltimore, MD; Charleston, SC; Charlotte, NC; Columbia, SC; Greensboro, NC; Greenville, SC; Louisville, KY; Raleigh, NC; Richmond, VA; Virginia Beach, VA; and Washington, DC. Mountain: Includes Albuquerque, NM; Boise, ID; Colorado Springs, CO; Denver, CO; Las Vegas, NV; Ogden, UT; Phoenix, AZ; Salt Lake City, UT; and Tucson, AZ. Northeast: Includes Albany, NY; Allentown, PA; Boston, MA; Bridgeport, CT; Buffalo, NY; Harrisburg, PA; Hartford, CT; Lancaster, PA; New Haven, CT; New York, NY; Philadelphia, PA; Pittsburgh, PA; Portland, ME; Providence, RI; Rochester, NY; Scranton, PA; Springfield, MA; Syracuse, NY; and Worcester, MA. Pacific: Includes Bakersfield, CA; Fresno, CA; Los Angeles, CA; Modesto, CA; Portland, OR; Riverside, CA; Sacramento, CA; San Diego, CA; San Francisco, CA; San Jose, CA; Seattle, WA; Stockton, CA; and Ventura, CA. Southeast: Includes Atlanta, GA; Augusta, GA; Birmingham, AL; Chattanooga, TN; Daytona Beach, FL; Fort Myers, FL; Jackson, MS; Jacksonville, FL; Knoxville, TN; Lakeland, FL; Melbourne, FL; Memphis, TN; Miami, FL; Nashville, TN; Orlando, FL; Sarasota, FL; and Tampa, FL. Southwest: Includes Austin, TX; Baton Rouge, LA; Dallas, TX; El Paso, TX; Houston, TX; Little Rock, AR; McAllen, TX; New Orleans, LA; Oklahoma City, OK; San Antonio, TX; and Tulsa, OK. West North Central: Includes Des Moines, IA; Kansas City, MO; Minneapolis, MN; Omaha, NE; St. Louis, MO; and Wichita, KS. Payment Types Assisted Living The vast majority of assisted living units utilize a rental form of payment. Of the assisted living facilities surveyed for State of Seniors Housing 2017, 87.8% were rental. Many rental communities do charge community or assessment fees, however, which are generally less than $20,000 and non- refundable. Assisted living is still a largely private-pay industry. According to the 2009 Overview of Assisted Living, which is the most recent publication available, funding for assisted living comes from the following sources: 85 Brookdale Castle Hills Only a small percent of assisted living residents pay for their care through a managed care program or with long term care insurance. However, the popularity of long term care insurance is growing, as it is now given the same preferential tax treatment as expenditures on other types of health insurance. The new tax advantages, in conjunction with a growing awareness of the need for individuals to plan for long term care expenses, have led to an increased interest and growing market for long term care insurance. Conclusion Assisted living is considered needs based, and many consumers find the ability to pay for assisted living even in hard times. Looking forward, with the economy and housing market recovering, demand for assisted living will increase across the nation. New construction is increasing, especially in markets with lower barriers to entry. There is some risk of near term overbuilding, which will likely impact older assets in need of updating. Over the longer term, however, strong increases in demand will occur, leading to continued demand for assisted living assets. 86 Brookdale Castle Hills Supply and Demand Analysis Introduction In this section, we will analyze supply and demand conditions. Metro Market Supply and Demand Conditions The NIC Map Database provides the following data for the San Antonio MSA, which includes the counties shown in the following map. An overview of the seniors housing market is shown in the following table. 87 Brookdale Castle Hills Trends in the assisted living market over time are shown in the following table. The NIC survey divides the market into submarkets by constituent county, the data for which is shown in the following table. For stabilized properties that are mostly assisted living, the average occupancy rate is 76.0%. In addition, for Bexar County (the subject’s county), assisted living occupancy is 73.9%. Delineation of the Market Area As discussed previously, we consider the subject’s PMA to be the area within a 4-mile radius of the site. Target Market The subject’s target market group consists of the age qualified population that has adequate income to live in elderly housing and adult children who are caregivers for an elderly relative. Therefore, the subject’s primary target market is seniors aged 65+ with household income of $35,000+, as well as adult children who might relocate such a person to the market. 88 Brookdale Castle Hills Methodology for Quantifying Supply In the case of facilities located some distance from the subject, we have allocated only a portion of the units based upon the estimated percent the market area for each competing facility overlaps the PMA. For example, the map below shows two fictional facilities, A and B, along with the concluded market area for Facility A. Facility B is not within the market area for Facility A. However, Facility B’s market area does overlap some of the market area for Facility A, as shown as follows: JLL’s methodology for estimating supply considers Facility B as being partially competitive with Facility A. We base the degree of its competitiveness upon the percentage of the subject’s market area, Facility A in this example that is overlapped by the estimated market area for Facility B. The percentage of overlap is mathematically calculated using a formula that factors in the size of the market area and the distance between each comparable and the subject. For example, if Facility 89 Brookdale Castle Hills B has 100 beds and the market area for Facility B overlaps Facility A’s market area by 20%, then 20 of Facility B’s beds are considered competitive. This same procedure is used to estimate competitive supply for each facility in and around the subject’s market area. Assisted Living Supply Analysis We will now focus upon the assisted living segment of the market. Bed licenses are granted based upon double occupancy in many rooms. In practice, a lesser number of rooms are typically occupied by more than one person. For this reason, we will analyze operating beds as opposed to licensed beds. For purposes of this report, a facility’s operating beds are considered the optimal number of persons that the facility is designed to accommodate at one time. This figure is generally equal to or greater than the number of units and equal to or less than the number of licensed beds. Our analysis also disregards small board and care facilities in and around the market area, although we know such facilities to be present. Board and care facilities generally have less than 25 licensed beds, are operated by “mom and pop” type operators, and offer accommodations and services of lesser quality. For consistency, such facilities are also excluded from the penetration rates utilized in the demand analysis. Existing Supply of Assisted Living The following table is a list of the assisted living facilities serving the subject’s market area. 90 Brookdale Castle Hills Brookdale Castle Hills 12078 Jackson Keller Rd, San Antonio, TX 43 44%104 2.5 96 2.5 29 ALF 32 5.1 7 46 Existing Supply of Assisted Living Property Name Type Number of Assisted Living Beds 44% Number of Competitive Beds 18% ALF D/MC: Free-standing assisted living facility, 100% memory care wing CCRC: Continuing care retirement community Total Number of Existing Competitive Beds Type Key Brookdale Hollywood Park ALF/MC 62 6.6 5% 3 16911 San Pedro Ave, Hollywood Park, TX Shavano Park Senior Living ALF/MC 68 6.8 3% 3 IALF 5996 Whitby Rd, San Antonio, TX 101 The Forum at Lincoln Heights CCRC 3.9 19 The Adante IALF/MC The Village of Incarnate Word 68 25 80 2702 Cembalo Blvd, San Antonio, TX 36% Morningside Ministries at the Manor 27 46%2.4 74 Brookdale Oakwell IALF/MC ALF/MC 4.9 602 Babcock Rd, San Antonio, TX 4.8 Brookdale Alamo Heights NC/ALF Regent Care Center Of San Antonio NC/ALF/MC 33 5.7 9% 4 16400 Blanco Rd, San Antonio, TX ALF/MC 101 3.0 ALF/MC 80 230 W Sunset Rd, San Antonio, TX Miles From Subject 100% Percent Beds Considered Competitive CCRC 58 311 W Nottingham Dr, San Antonio, TX 0.0 9505 Fredericksburg Rd, San Antonio, TX 29 4.6 5034 New Forest St, San Antonio, TX 3220 N Loop 1604 W, San Antonio, TX Brookdale San Antonio 7 23% 17 19% 22 ALF/MC 112 4.5 9203 Cinnamon Hl, San Antonio, TX Brookdale N. Fredericksburg Road 15% 18323 Sonterra Pl, San Antonio, TX Brookdale Shavano Park ALF/MC 78 5.8 9% Poet's Walk San Antonio ALF D/MC 60 7.2 2% Brookdale Medical Center Whitby 2 ALF/MC: Free-standing assisted living facility with memory care wing NC: Nursing center 6 Brookdale Hamilton Wolfe ALF/MC 119 5331 Hamilton Wolfe Rd, San Antonio, TX 10 Lynn Batts Ln, San Antonio, TX 17% Colonial Gardens 4.1 4.8 Franklin Park - Alamo Heights Inn At Los Patios IALF 8700 Post Oak Ln, San Antonio, TX 4.7 5 15% NC/ALF 70 35% 4707 Broadway St, San Antonio, TX 26% 3.1 16% 19 17% 28 ALF D/MC 36 Newforest Estates IALF 3360 Oakwell Ct, San Antonio, TX 16% 14 855 E Basse Rd, San Antonio, TX 37 5.0 13303 Jones Maltsberger Road, San Antonio, TX 109 5.5 15430 Huebner Rd, San Antonio, TX 11% The Cottages at Danny Kaye ALF/MC 12 6 Brookdale Maltsberger 454 NC/ALF: Nursing center with assisted living ILF: Independent living facility NC/ALF/MC: Nursing center with assisted living & memory care wing IALF: Independent and assisted living facility NC/MC/ILF: Nursing center with independent living & memory care wing IALF/MC: Independent and assisted living facility with memory care wing NC/IL: Nursing center with independent living ILF/MC: Independent living facility with memory care wing NC/MC: Nursing center with specialized memory care beds 5982 Danny Kaye Dr, San Antonio, TX 14% 5 9000 Floyd Curl Dr, San Antonio, TX Brookdale Medical Center Kingsley ALF/MC ALF 49 5.7 9% 5 4096 Dezavala Rd, San Antonio, TX 52 7.3 2% 1 5.0 Heartis San Antonio ALF/MC 79 Arden Courts - San Antonio ALF D/MC 64 5.4 15290 Huebner Rd, San Antonio, TX 12% 8 Franklin Park Sonterra 5438 Presidio Parkway, San Antonio, TX 12 11%5.5 8003 North Hallow, San Antonio, TX Villa De San Antonio IALF 55 6 91 Brookdale Castle Hills Occupancy of Competitive Supply The occupancy and waiting list status of the competitive supply of assisted living are as follows: 100% Yes Occupancy of Competitive Assisted Living Current Occupancy % Waiting List Status Brookdale Castle Hills 71% No 12078 Jackson Keller Rd, San Antonio, TX 92% No 100% Yes 10 Lynn Batts Ln, San Antonio, TX 2702 Cembalo Blvd, San Antonio, TX The Adante 15430 Huebner Rd, San Antonio, TX Arden Courts - San Antonio Heartis San Antonio 92% 15290 Huebner Rd, San Antonio, TX No 18323 Sonterra Pl, San Antonio, TX Franklin Park Sonterra Property Name 9203 Cinnamon Hl, San Antonio, TX Colonial Gardens 94% No Brookdale San Antonio 80% No Based upon the reported occupancy levels, the weighted average occupancy for competitive beds is as follows: Franklin Park Sonterra 1 92% 180 - 1 8 100% 8 12 92% 11 15430 Huebner Rd, San Antonio, TX Arden Courts - San Antonio 15290 Huebner Rd, San Antonio, TX Heartis San Antonio 72 22 80% 18 7 94% 7 Brookdale Castle Hills 12078 Jackson Keller Rd, San Antonio, TX Property Name Current Occupancy % Number of Occupied Beds 101 71% 2702 Cembalo Blvd, San Antonio, TX Brookdale San Antonio 9203 Cinnamon Hl, San Antonio, TX 10 Lynn Batts Ln, San Antonio, TX Weighted Average Occupancy of Competitive Assisted Living 29 100% 29 Colonial Gardens The Adante 18323 Sonterra Pl, San Antonio, TX Number of Competitive Beds TOTALS 145 WEIGHTED AVERAGE OCCUPANCY AVERAGE OCCUPANCY REPORTED BY NIC 80% - 75% 92 Brookdale Castle Hills Occupancy at the subject property has lagged that of the market. Management noted that its location and layout are the two biggest factors impacting occupancy. The majority of incoming residents cannot live on the second floor due to evacuation restrictions; therefore, the second floor units are difficult to lease-up. In addition, the subject’s location and visibility is inferior to competing properties in the market. Assisted Living under Construction or Proposed Our research revealed no competitive projects under construction or proposed to be complete within the coming 36 months. Memory Care Supply Analysis We will now focus upon the memory care segment of the assisted living market. Alzheimer’s disease is a progressive, degenerative disease that attacks the brain and results in impaired memory, thinking, and behavior. It was first described by Dr. Alois Alzheimer in 1906 and has since been diagnosed in millions of people. The exact causes have yet to be discovered. Memory care is an umbrella term used to describe the loss of cognitive or intellectual function. Many conditions can cause memory care issues. Issues related to depression, drug interaction, thyroid, and other problems may be reversible if detected early. Several other diseases also cause memory care issues, such as Parkinson’s, Creutzfeldt-Jakob, Huntington’s, and Multi-Infarct or vascular disease, caused by multiple strokes in the brain. The following statistics from the National Alzheimer’s Association’s 2018 Alzheimer’s Disease Facts and Figures report delineate the strong need for facilities that care for persons with memory care issues: ■ Alzheimer’s is a progressive, degenerative disease of the brain and the most common form of memory care disease. ■ An estimated 5.7 million Americans of all ages have Alzheimer’s dementia in 2018. This figure includes 5.5 million people aged 65 and older and 200,000 individuals under age 65 who have younger-onset memory care issues. ■ One in ten people aged 65 and older (10%) has Alzheimer’s dementia. ■ Of those with Alzheimer’s, an estimated 4% are under age 65, 16% are 65 to 74, 44% are 75 to 84, and 37% are 85 and older. It is noted that percentages do not total 100% due to rounding. ■ More women than men have memory care issues. Almost two-thirds of all Americans living with Alzheimer’s are women. Of the 5.5 million people over age 65 with Alzheimer’s in the United States, 3.4 million are women and 2.1 million are men. Based on estimates from ADAMS, 16% of women aged 71 and older have memory care issues compared with 11% of men. 93 Brookdale Castle Hills ■ The number of Americans surviving into their 80s and 90s and beyond is expected to grow dramatically due to advances in medicine and medical technology, as well as social and environmental conditions. Additionally, a very large segment of the American population – the baby boom generation – is reaching retirement age. ■ By 2030, the segment of the U.S. population aged 65 years and older is expected to double, and the estimated 74 million older Americans will make up approximately 20% of the total population (up from 16% in 2018). As the number of older Americans grows rapidly, so too will the numbers of new and existing cases of memory care issues. ■ In 2000, there were an estimated 411,000 new (incident) cases of Alzheimer’s disease. For 2010, that number was estimated to be 454,000 (a 10% increase); by 2030, it is projected to be 615,000 (35% increase from 2010); and by 2050, 959,000 (110% increase from 2010). ■ By 2025, the number of people aged 65 and older with Alzheimer’s disease is estimated to be over 7.1 million. This is a 29% increase from the 5.5 million aged 65 and older currently affected in 2018. ■ By 2050, the number of people aged 65 and older with Alzheimer’s disease may nearly triple, from 5.5 million to a projected 13.8 million, barring the development of medical breakthroughs to prevent or more effectively treat the disease. In the past, most persons with memory care issues have been cared for in the home by informal caregivers (friends or relatives) or through home health care agencies or other providers. With the continuing increase in two-income households and the recognition that caring for a person with memory care issues can be physically and mentally taxing, many informal caregivers are seeking options outside the home. This led to growth in the number of facilities providing specialized care for persons with memory care issues. Facilities providing specialized care for persons with memory care issues generally follow one of two models: the nursing care model or the assisted living model. Generally, the nursing care model can be characterized as being for patients who have relatively extensive health care needs in addition to requiring care for memory care issues. The nursing care model is a type of care subject to greater regulation than assisted living care. Staffing requirements for nursing care are typically greater, and the associated costs for care are higher. As many persons with memory care issues are otherwise healthy, the assisted living model is the leading model for the care of persons with memory care issues. 94 Brookdale Castle Hills Existing Supply of Memory Care The existing supply of memory care within the PMA is as follows. 95 Brookdale Castle Hills ALF/MC Brookdale Shavano Park ALF/MC 17 5.8 9% 2 4096 Dezavala Rd, San Antonio, TX Total Number of Existing Competitive Beds 120 NC: Nursing center ALF D/MC: Free-standing assisted living facility, 100% memory care wing NC/ALF: Nursing center with assisted living ILF: Independent living facility NC/ALF/MC: Nursing center with assisted living & memory care wing IALF: Independent and assisted living facility NC/MC/ILF: Nursing center with independent living & memory care wing IALF/MC: Independent and assisted living facility with memory care wing NC/IL: Nursing center with independent living ILF/MC: Independent living facility with memory care wing NC/MC: Nursing center with specialized memory care beds CCRC: Continuing care retirement community Heartis San Antonio ALF/MC 15430 Huebner Rd, San Antonio, TX Regent Care Center Of San Antonio NC/ALF/MC 33 5.7 9% 4 16400 Blanco Rd, San Antonio, TX ALF/MC 64 5.4 12% 8 15290 Huebner Rd, San Antonio, TX 11% 4 32 5.5 Type Key ALF/MC: Free-standing assisted living facility with memory care wing Brookdale Castle Hills ALF/MC 18 0.0 100% 18 1207 Jackson Keller Rd, San Antonio, TX 230 W Sunset Rd, San Antonio, TX The Adante 9505 Fredericksburg Rd, San Antonio, TX Property Name Type Number of Memory Care Beds Miles From Subject Percent Beds Considered Competitive Number of Competitive Beds CCRC 20 3.9 26% 6 30 4.5 19% 6 Bader House in Shavano Park 311 W Nottingham Dr, San Antonio, TX Franklin Park - Alamo Heights IALF/MC The Forum at Lincoln Heights CCRC ALF D/MC 16 1418 Walkers Way, San Antonio, TX Arden Courts - San Antonio Colonial Gardens ALF/MC 5438 Presidio Parkway, San Antonio, TX 3411 Paesanos Parkway, San Antonio, TX Shavano Park Senior Living ALF/MC 28 6.8 3% 1 3220 N Loop 1604 W, San Antonio, TX ALF D/MC 24 6.8 4% 1 Poet's Walk San Antonio ALF/MC 60 Brookdale Hollywood Park ALF/MC 16 6.6 5% 1 16911 San Pedro Ave, Hollywood Park, TX 4707 Broadway St, San Antonio, TX 40 2.5 44% 18 IALF/MC 20 3.1 35% 8 Brookdale N. Fredericksburg Road 4.6 19% 3 36 4.7 10 Lynn Batts Ln, San Antonio, TX 2702 Cembalo Blvd, San Antonio, TX The Village of Incarnate Word 28 2.4 46% 13 Autumn Grove Cottage Blanco 9203 Cinnamon Hl, San Antonio, TX 17% 7 Brookdale Oakwell ALF/MC Existing Supply of Memory Care The Cottages at Danny Kaye ALF/MC 16 5.1 5982 Danny Kaye Dr, San Antonio, TX Brookdale Medical Center Kingsley ALF/MC 20 5.0 9000 Floyd Curl Dr, San Antonio, TX 15% 3 14% 3 4.9 5331 Hamilton Wolfe Rd, San Antonio, TX 16% 4 Brookdale Hamilton Wolfe ALF/MC 20 24 4.8 3360 Oakwell Ct, San Antonio, TX 16% 4 Brookdale San Antonio ALF/MC 15 4.1 23% 4 7.2 2% 2 96 Brookdale Castle Hills Occupancy of Competitive Supply The occupancy and waiting list status of the competitive supply of memory care is as follows: 80% Occupancy of Competitive Memory Care Current Occupancy % Waiting List StatusProperty Name Brookdale Castle Hills 100% No Brookdale San Antonio 9203 Cinnamon Hl, San Antonio, TX Heartis San Antonio 92% No 15430 Huebner Rd, San Antonio, TX 89% No 1207 Jackson Keller Rd, San Antonio, TX Arden Courts - San Antonio 15290 Huebner Rd, San Antonio, TX The Adante 100% No 2702 Cembalo Blvd, San Antonio, TX No Colonial Gardens 10 Lynn Batts Ln, San Antonio, TX 94% No Based upon the reported occupancy levels, the weighted average occupancy for competitive beds is as follows: 51 - 47 TOTALS 8 100% 8 4 92% 4 Arden Courts - San Antonio 15290 Huebner Rd, San Antonio, TX Heartis San Antonio 15430 Huebner Rd, San Antonio, TX 6 80% 5 7 94% 7 2702 Cembalo Blvd, San Antonio, TX The Adante Property Name Brookdale Castle Hills 8 100% 8 Colonial Gardens 10 Lynn Batts Ln, San Antonio, TX 9203 Cinnamon Hl, San Antonio, TX Brookdale San Antonio 1207 Jackson Keller Rd, San Antonio, TX Weighted Average Occupancy of Competitive Memory Care Number of Competitive Beds Current Occupancy % Number of Occupied Beds 18 89% 16 WEIGHTED AVERAGE OCCUPANCY AVERAGE OCCUPANCY REPORTED BY NIC 92% - 75% Memory Care under Construction or Proposed Our research revealed no competitive projects under construction or proposed to be complete within the coming 36 months. 97 Brookdale Castle Hills Barriers to Entry The subject is in a market with limited barriers to entry. Vacant sites are plentiful and zoning and building permits are easily obtained. Thus, it is likely that future competition will be developed as warranted by demand. Seniors Housing Demand Analysis We will now analyze demand for seniors housing. Our analysis will show demand estimates for the current year, each year for the following four, and 10 years from the current year. The demand estimates will be based upon the quantity of four potential target groups who are likely users of seniors housing. Analysis of these four target groups will provide four separate indications of demand for seniors housing. We will then consider each one of them to derive our demand conclusions, much as the three approaches to value in an appraisal are reconciled into a single value estimate. The target groups are as follows: Target Group 1 Although the vast majority of persons entering seniors housing are age 80 and over, some persons between the ages of 65 and 80 elect to live in seniors housing. Therefore, the broadest potential target group for seniors housing is persons age 65 and over. The number of persons age 65+ is often considered in bed need methodologies which are adopted by various state licensing agencies. Target Group 2 The next potential target group typically examined in evaluating demand for seniors housing is the number of households headed by an individual age 75 and over. The vast majority of seniors housing residents fall into the 75+ range. Target Group 3 The next target group consists of the age qualified population that has adequate income to live in seniors housing. Many operators consider $35,000 to be the minimum qualifying income. Although research has shown that many seniors with lesser income levels can afford to reside in seniors housing due to having income from other sources or assets to spend down, $35,000 is widely considered a benchmark for the private pay market. Due to the location of the subject, this target group consists of the number of households with a household income of $35,000+ headed by an individual age 75+. Therefore, this target group has been utilized in this analysis. Target Group 4 This group consists of a group referred to in the industry as adult children. Children and/or other relatives of seniors generally play a significant role in the placement of a senior in a seniors housing facility. Market areas where there are large concentrations of persons in the 45 to 64 age group can often support a significantly larger supply of seniors housing than would be indicated through 98 Brookdale Castle Hills analysis of seniors already residing in the area. This is because in-migration of seniors into markets with large adult child populations is common, as the elderly are often relocated to a facility near the home of their adult children or other relative. Many operators of seniors housing have recognized the importance of the adult child market. Thus, this target group is the number of persons in the age 45 to 64 age bracket. Income and ADL Qualification Some in the industry apply additional qualifications to further refine the potential target market before applying a penetration rate. These further qualifications might include quantification of seniors likely to require assistance with ADLs and quantification of seniors by living arrangements, restricting the market to those living alone under the assumption that few seniors living with spouses will choose seniors housing. However, there are no reliable local sources to accurately estimate these factors in a given market area, typically leading to the use of national statistics. These further qualifications tend to complicate the application and derivation of penetration rates, and are a futile exercise since the same national data is typically applied to each market area. For this reason, we will not attempt to further qualify the potential market. Discussion of Achievable Penetration Rates There are no industry standard definitions for penetration or capture rates. For purposes of this analysis, a penetration rate is considered to be the number of beds or units of a specific type that should be demanded at market equilibrium within a given market area, divided by the quantity of persons or households of a specific type in the same market area. For example, if 100 beds of assisted living should be demanded, and there are 1,000 persons age 65+ that reside in the PMA, the indicated penetration rate is 10%. In order to determine appropriate penetration rates, we consulted national demand estimates provided in The Case for Investing in Seniors Housing and Long Term Care Properties with Updated Projections. We have also relied upon actual penetration rates being realized based upon data from NIC Map. The penetration rates are based upon demand for public and private pay. The inclusion of public pay demand significantly impacts the nursing facility sector and has a lesser but still notable impact upon the other two sectors. It is important to note that in states where Medicaid waivers and/or other public pay alternatives are not available, these penetration rates may not be realized. These demand estimates, derived from the most complete and authoritative study of national demand in existence, will be used as the basis for estimating demand in the subject’s market area. We have been evaluating seniors housing facilities since the mid-1980s. Over the years, we have worked with many of the most prolific developers of seniors housing in the nation including Sunrise Senior Living, Holiday Retirement, Senior Resource Group, Brookdale Senior Living, and Capital Senior Living. Most of the successful developers and operators of private pay seniors housing target 99 Brookdale Castle Hills the adult child population (persons age 45 to 64). In our tours of literally hundreds of facilities nationally, we always ask the source of residents and how often the decision is made by an adult child caregiver. In most instances, the adult child caregiver is noted as being the primary decision maker, and in many markets, more than 50% of the residents are brought in from outside the PMA by adult child caregivers that live in the PMA. Thus, in our analysis, the adult child market (Target Group 4) is given considerable weight. We have also field tested the penetration rates, used herein, in the preparation of more than 3,000 market studies and appraisals of seniors housing assets prepared over the past 10+ years. We have found these penetration rates to be excellent predictors of actual market conditions. In other words, when our demand analysis indicated there to be an undersupply, we typically found high market occupancy levels indicating unmet demand. Alternatively, when our demand model showed an oversupply, we have typically seen low market occupancy levels. 100 Brookdale Castle Hills Demand Estimates The following table shows the estimated number of persons or households in each target group for a number of time periods, and the indicated demand for each period based upon the penetration rates previously discussed. 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2028 A. PMA Persons Age 65+ 36,604 37,684 38,763 39,843 40,922 42,002 48,196 B. Achievable Penetration Rate 2.0% 2.0% 2.0% 2.0% 2.0% 2.0% 2.0% C. Indicated Market Area Demand (A X B) 739 760 782 804 826 848 973 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2028 A. PMA HHs Age 75+ 7,044 7,322 7,601 7,879 8,158 8,436 10,103 B. Achievable Penetration Rate 6.6% 6.6% 6.6% 6.6% 6.6% 6.6% 6.6% C. Indicated Market Area Demand (A X B) 467 485 504 522 541 559 670 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2028 A. PMA HHs Age 75+ W/Inc. $35,000+ 5,540 5,799 6,059 6,318 6,578 6,837 8,438 B. Achievable Penetration Rate 21.6% 21.6% 21.6% 21.6% 21.6% 21.6% 21.6% C. Indicated Market Area Demand (A X B) 1,194 1,250 1,306 1,362 1,418 1,474 1,819 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2028 A. PMA Persons Age 45-64 52,374 52,337 52,300 52,263 52,226 52,189 52,005 B. Achievable Penetration Rate 1.1% 1.1% 1.1% 1.1% 1.1% 1.1% 1.1% C. Indicated Market Area Demand (A X B) 597 597 596 596 595 595 593 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2028 Indicated Demand 896 923 951 979 1,007 1,034 1,206 Adjustment for Local Market Conditions 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Concluded Demand 896 923 951 979 1,007 1,034 1,206 Demand For Assisted Living Target Group 4 - Persons Age 45-64 (Adult Children) Item Year Item Target Group 3 - Households Age 75+ With Income $35,000+ Year Target Group 2 - Households Age 75+ Target Group 1 - Persons Age 65+ Year Item Item Year Demand Conclusions Item Year The demand indication for each target group is independent of the other three demand indications. In this case, our final demand conclusions is weighted 50% to Target Group 3 - age and income qualified seniors, and 50% to Target Group 4 - adult children. These two indications of demand are the best indicators of demand for private pay seniors housing. 101 Brookdale Castle Hills Comparison of Supply and Demand The following table summarizes our conclusions of supply and demand for assisted living. 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2028 A. Indicated Demand 896 923 951 979 1,007 1,034 1,206 B. Less Existing Supply 454 454 454 454 454 454 454 C. Existing Unmet Demand or Oversupply 442 469 497 525 553 580 752 D. Additions/Subtractions to Supply 0 0 0 0 0 N.A. N.A. E. Unmet Demand After Additions 442 469 497 525 553 580 752 Comparison of Supply and Demand For Assisted Living Item Year Our analysis shows that the PMA has an undersupply of assisted living in the current year. This is supported by the higher occupancy levels of existing facilities in the PMA. No new supply is forecast to be added over the next three years, so market conditions should continually improve. As noted previously, demand for memory care is a subset of overall assisted living demand. Memory care facilities are normally licensed the same as standard assisted living facilities. Furthermore, it is relatively easy for facilities to begin or cease providing specialized memory care since the physical plant requirements are not significantly different and the license is not different. We have previously determined demand for all assisted living, including memory care. As of the 1st quarter of 2018, NIC MAP reported that there were 405,869 assisted living units and 129,002 memory care units in the top 140 metro markets. Thus, the combined assisted living supply count inclusive of memory care was 534,871 units. The memory care assisted living supply figure in turn equated to 24.12% of the total assisted living supply. The average occupancy was 87.5% for assisted living and 83.9% for memory care, indicating that demand between the two segments is near a balanced level. However, we believe this provides just a starting point, and, in fact, understates potential demand for memory care for several reasons. Firstly, memory care units are much more likely to be semi- private than traditional assisted living, and the statistics noted above are based upon units, not beds. Therefore, the quantity of memory care units above has a much higher level of double occupancy, thus the demand on a bed, rather than unit basis, would be much higher as a percent of total demand. Furthermore, many residents of traditional assisted living have mild to moderate memory care issues and would be better suited for residency in a memory care facility, but the supply of memory care units is lacking in many markets. According to the Alzheimer’s Association, there are approximately 484,000 people age 65 or older that developed Alzheimer’s disease in the United States in 2018. Also, the Alzheimer’s Association provided the following data regarding projected change by state for those residents with Alzheimer’s disease. 102 Brookdale Castle Hills 103 Brookdale Castle Hills As shown in the figures above, between 2018 and 2025, every state and region across the county is expected to experience double-digit percentage increases in the numbers of people with Alzheimer’s due to increases in the proportion of the population 65 and older. Major operators of memory care facilities such as Brookdale, Capital Senior Living, and Benchmark believe that demand for memory care is as high as 38% of total assisted living demand. Based upon this, we will estimate demand for memory care at 35% of total assisted living demand. The following table summarizes our conclusions of supply and demand for memory care. 104 Brookdale Castle Hills 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2028 A. Indicated Demand 313 323 333 343 352 362 422 B. Less Existing Supply 120 120 120 120 120 120 120 C. Existing Unmet Demand or Oversupply 193 203 213 223 232 242 302 D. Additions/Subtractions to Supply 0 0 0 0 0 N.A. N.A. E. Unmet Demand After Additions 193 203 213 223 232 242 302 Comparison of Supply and Demand For Memory Care Item Year Our analysis shows that the PMA has an under-supply of memory care in the current year. This is supported by the higher occupancy levels of existing facilities in the PMA. No new supply is forecast to be added over the next three years, so market conditions should continually improve. Supply and Demand Conclusion The PMA is a growing market. There are low barriers to entry in this market. Our analysis shows that the assisted living and memory care markets are under-supplied. This is supported by our occupancy survey as shown as follows. Segment Assisted Living Memory Care MSA 76.0% 76.0% Submarket 73.9% 73.9% Rent Comparables 92.6% 94.1% All Facilities in PMA 75.0% 75.0% Subject 71.0% 89.0% Market Occupancy Summary Given the subject’s location, condition, and design, the subject should be capable of reaching and maintaining a stabilized occupancy in the near term. 105 Brookdale Castle Hills Highest and Best Use Analysis Highest and best use is shaped and determined by forces within the market such as supply and demand. The four criteria used in evaluating the highest and best use of a property are: ■ Legally permissible ■ Physically possible ■ Financially feasible ■ Maximally productive The four criteria are applied in sequential order. A property often will have numerous uses that are legally permissible, but the test of physical possibility may remove some options from consideration, fewer still may meet the test of financial feasibility, and only a single use is maximally productive. Highest and Best Use of the Land as though Vacant The analysis of the highest and best use of the land as though vacant assumes that the property being appraised is vacant or can be made vacant by demolishing any improvements. This determination is crucial to determine the value of the site as though vacant and is also used in examining improvements and their conformance to the highest and best use of the site. Legally Permissible Private restrictions, zoning, building codes, historical district regulations, and environmental regulations must all be considered in determining the legally permissible uses of a site. Potential changes in these restrictions must also be addressed. The legally permissible uses were discussed in detail in the site analysis and zoning sections of this report. The subject site is currently zoned C. Permitted uses include multi-family and retirement facilities. Seniors housing is a permitted use. There are no known zoning changes pending or contemplated. Physically Possible The physical characteristics of the subject site were discussed in detail in the site analysis section. The site is functional in size and shape and is serviced by standard municipal utilities. The site has below average accessibility and visibility. The site is suitable for a broad range of uses, including seniors housing. Financially Feasible An analysis of local market conditions provides an indication of the financial feasibility of a given use. The market analysis presented earlier in this report assessed the local market and indicated that there is demand for the subject. Further, the income and expense analysis that follows reveals 106 Brookdale Castle Hills the subject is forecasted to produce a positive return, yielding a value well in excess of cost. Therefore, development of a seniors housing facility is a financially feasible use. Maximally Productive The final test of highest and best use of the site as though vacant is whether the use is maximally productive, yielding the highest land value. Analysis of physically possible, legally permissible, and financially feasible uses indicates that the maximally productive use of the site as though vacant is for development of a seniors housing facility. While there are potentially other feasible uses, this use is believed to provide the highest net return to the site. Highest and Best Use of the Property as Improved This analysis considers the subject as improved. Legally Permissible The current use is a legal use. Physically Possible The physical characteristics of the subject improvements were discussed in detail in the improvement analysis section of this report. Overall, the layout and position of the improvements are considered functional. Since seniors housing facilities are specialized facilities, there are no other physically possible uses of the structure that would not require substantial reconstruction or demolition. Financially Feasible Operation of the subject as a seniors housing facility is a financially feasible use, yielding a positive value well in excess of the subject’s land value. Maximally Productive The maximally productive use of the subject as improved is for continued use as a seniors housing facility. The subject is valued based upon this use as a seniors housing facility. The most likely potential purchaser is a REIT, investor, or owner/operator. 107 Brookdale Castle Hills Income Capitalization - Direct Capitalization The income capitalization approach is based upon the premise that the present value of a property is based upon the present worth of future benefits. There are two primary methods that are normally utilized in developing the income capitalization approach - the yield capitalization method and the direct capitalization method. Development of the direct capitalization method is presented below. The direct capitalization method is a method that converts an income estimate for a single year into an estimate of value through the application of a capitalization rate. An overall capitalization rate (RO) is normally used. The RO reflects the relationship between a single year’s income and value. The most common way to estimate overall capitalization rates is via analysis of comparable sales. The direct capitalization method is developed in four basic steps: ■ Analyze the market and contractual income of the subject. ■ From available market data, estimate a proper allowance for vacancy and credit loss forecast to occur during the projected period of ownership. ■ Estimate and project anticipated fixed and operating expenses to be incurred by the real estate. ■ Select and apply an appropriate capitalization rate. Income and Expense Analysis We have been provided with operating statements for the following periods: ■ Year ending 12/16 ■ Year ending 12/17 ■ 3 Months ending 05/18 ■ Budget year ending 12/18 The income and expenses for these periods is presented on the following page. Below are notes regarding our reconstruction of the operating statements: ■ The year to date figures have been annualized. ■ The additional care revenue shown in the historical summary below is inclusive of Personalized Living revenue. Personalized Living is a Brookdale program that offers a coordinated suite of social, advisory, wellness, home care, and cleaning services. We assume this program will continue to be offered at the subject property and have included this revenue in our forecast of additional care income. 108 Brookdale Castle Hills ■ The subject’s historical wages and salaries data are aggregated into “exempt” and “nonexempt” categories, although some individual departmental salaries and wages are reported. As such, we have forecast salaries and wages by department based on the income and expense comparables, with consideration given to the available historical data as appropriate. 109 Brookdale Castle Hills Annual Budget Year Per % of Year Per % of 3 Months Per % of For Year Per % of Item Ending Resident Total Ending Resident Total Ending Resident Total Ending Resident Total 12/16 Day Income 12/17 Day Income 05/18 Day Income 12/18 Day Income Total Resident Days 23,638 25,227 25,278 25,116 Income Rent al Income Rental Income $2,765,739 $117.00 98.6% $2,676,676 $106.10 91.7% $2,459,592 $97.30 85.2% $2,478,584 $98.68 89.8% Less Vacancy & Coll Loss $0 $0.00 0.0% $0 $0.00 0.0% $0 $0.00 0.0% $0 $0.00 0.0% Less Conc./Loss to Leases ($435,067) ($18.41) -15.5% ($343,243) ($13.61) -11.8% ($299,324) ($11.84) -10.4% ($298,882) ($11.90) -10.8% Net Rental Income $2,330,672 $98.60 83.1% $2,333,433 $92.50 79.9% $2,160,268 $85.46 74.9% $2,179,702 $86.78 79.0% Sundry Income Additional Meals/Care $373,631 $15.81 13.3% $507,296 $20.11 17.4% $590,300 $23.35 20.5% $485,239 $19.32 17.6% Commercial $22,722 $0.96 0.8% $17,204 $0.68 0.6% $19,024 $0.75 0.7% $21,797 $0.87 0.8% Parking $0 $0.00 0.0% $0 $0.00 0.0% $0 $0.00 0.0% $0 $0.00 0.0% Entrance/Community Fees $51,211 $2.17 1.8% $29,925 $1.19 1.0% $47,500 $1.88 1.6% $50,834 $2.02 1.8% Second Persons $12,951 $0.55 0.5% $19,403 $0.77 0.7% $51,696 $2.05 1.8% $10,104 $0.40 0.4% Other Income $13,595 $0.58 0.5% $12,436 $0.49 0.4% $16,828 $0.67 0.6% $11,544 $0.46 0.4% Total Sundry Income $474,110 $20.06 16.9% $586,264 $23.24 20.1% $725,348 $28.69 25.1% $579,518 $23.07 21.0% Effective Gross Income $2,804,782 $118.66 100.0% $2,919,697 $115.74 100.0% $2,885,616 $114.15 100.0% $2,759,220 $109.86 100.0% Expenses Propert y Real Estate Taxes $209,849 $8.88 7.5% $176,681 $7.00 6.1% $222,260 $8.79 7.7% $234,622 $9.34 8.5% Ground/Facility Rent $0 $0.00 0.0% $0 $0.00 0.0% $0 $0.00 0.0% $0 $0.00 0.0% Licenses $1,296 $0.05 0.0% $3,116 $0.12 0.1% $2,576 $0.10 0.1% $3,379 $0.13 0.1% Insurance (Prop.& Liability) $75,856 $3.21 2.7% $48,037 $1.90 1.6% $46,440 $1.84 1.6% $46,473 $1.85 1.7% Utilities $152,962 $6.47 5.5% $174,890 $6.93 6.0% $160,488 $6.35 5.6% $168,037 $6.69 6.1% Building R&M, Supplies & Other $194,004 $8.21 6.9% $159,587 $6.33 5.5% $154,704 $6.12 5.4% $159,556 $6.35 5.8% Wages $0 $0.00 0.0% $0 $0.00 0.0% $0 $0.00 0.0% $0 $0.00 0.0% Payroll Taxes/Benefits $0 $0.00 0.0% $0 $0.00 0.0% $0 $0.00 0.0% $0 $0.00 0.0% Total Property Expense $633,967 $26.82 22.6% $562,311 $22.29 19.3% $586,468 $23.20 20.3% $612,067 $24.37 22.2% Housekeeping Wages $37,954 $1.61 1.4% $36,610 $1.45 1.3% $32,756 $1.30 1.1% $38,719 $1.54 1.4% Payroll Taxes/Benefits $9,256 $0.39 0.3% $9,582 $0.38 0.3% $8,605 $0.34 0.3% $10,596 $0.42 0.4% Supplies & Other $12,905 $0.55 0.5% $14,884 $0.59 0.5% $19,772 $0.78 0.7% $16,452 $0.66 0.6% Total Hskping & Lndry Expense $60,115 $2.54 2.1% $61,076 $2.42 2.1% $61,133 $2.42 2.1% $65,767 $2.62 2.4% Diet ary Wages $95,037 $4.02 3.4% $95,951 $3.80 3.3% $91,936 $3.64 3.2% $95,653 $3.81 3.5% Payroll Taxes/Benefits $23,176 $0.98 0.8% $25,113 $1.00 0.9% $24,151 $0.96 0.8% $26,176 $1.04 0.9% Food $132,391 $5.60 4.7% $141,733 $5.62 4.9% $133,096 $5.27 4.6% $142,187 $5.66 5.2% Supplies & Other $7,874 $0.33 0.3% $10,937 $0.43 0.4% $11,568 $0.46 0.4% $12,108 $0.48 0.4% Total Dietary Expense $258,478 $10.93 9.2% $273,734 $10.85 9.4% $260,751 $10.32 9.0% $276,124 $10.99 10.0% Care Wages $527,185 $22.30 18.8% $561,129 $22.24 19.2% $543,088 $21.48 18.8% $605,020 $24.09 21.9% Payroll Taxes/Benefits $128,562 $5.44 4.6% $146,860 $5.82 5.0% $142,665 $5.64 4.9% $165,569 $6.59 6.0% Supplies & Other $11,049 $0.47 0.4% $4,521 $0.18 0.2% $4,268 $0.17 0.1% $5,658 $0.23 0.2% Total Care Services Expense $666,796 $28.21 23.8% $712,510 $28.24 24.4% $690,021 $27.30 23.9% $776,247 $30.91 28.1% Act ivit ies Wages $42,325 $1.79 1.5% $37,131 $1.47 1.3% $12,272 $0.49 0.4% $35,405 $1.41 1.3% Payroll Taxes/Benefits $10,322 $0.44 0.4% $9,718 $0.39 0.3% $3,224 $0.13 0.1% $9,689 $0.39 0.4% Supplies & Other $30,909 $1.31 1.1% $31,772 $1.26 1.1% $29,048 $1.15 1.0% $31,011 $1.23 1.1% Total Activities Expense $83,556 $3.53 3.0% $78,621 $3.12 2.7% $44,544 $1.76 1.5% $76,105 $3.03 2.8% General & Administ rat ive Wages-Admin $589,545 $24.94 21.0% $606,144 $24.03 20.8% $676,116 $26.75 23.4% $674,561 $26.86 24.4% Payroll Taxes/Benefits $143,770 $6.08 5.1% $158,642 $6.29 5.4% $177,611 $7.03 6.2% $184,600 $7.35 6.7% Wages-Marketing $0 $0.00 0.0% $0 $0.00 0.0% $0 $0.00 0.0% $0 $0.00 0.0% Payroll Taxes/Benefits $0 $0.00 0.0% $0 $0.00 0.0% $0 $0.00 0.0% $0 $0.00 0.0% Marketing & Advertising $79,881 $3.38 2.8% $51,629 $2.05 1.8% $26,520 $1.05 0.9% $86,107 $3.43 3.1% Legal & Audit $324 $0.01 0.0% $0 $0.00 0.0% $0 $0.00 0.0% $180 $0.01 0.0% Telephone $17,321 $0.73 0.6% $18,096 $0.72 0.6% $18,460 $0.73 0.6% $18,192 $0.72 0.7% Bad Debt Expense $20,643 $0.87 0.7% $9,434 $0.37 0.3% ($448) ($0.02) 0.0% $17,888 $0.71 0.6% Supplies & Other $88,431 $3.74 3.2% $77,489 $3.07 2.7% $63,632 $2.52 2.2% $72,219 $2.88 2.6% Total G&A Expense $939,915 $39.76 33.5% $921,434 $36.53 31.6% $961,891 $38.05 33.3% $1,053,747 $41.95 38.2% Management Expense Total Management Expense $14,349 $0.61 0.5% $25,334 $1.00 0.9% $27,012 $1.07 0.9% $36,489 $1.45 1.3% Reserves Expense Total Reserves Expense $0 $0.00 0.0% $0 $0.00 0.0% $0 $0.00 0.0% $0 $0.00 0.0% Total Expenses $2,657,176 $112.41 94.7% $2,635,019 $104.45 90.2% $2,631,820 $104.11 91.2% $2,896,546 $115.33 105.0% Net Operating Income $147,606 $6.24 5.3% $284,678 $11.28 9.8% $253,796 $10.04 8.8% ($137,326) ($5.47) -5.0% Subject's Income and Expenses 110 Brookdale Castle Hills Annual Budget Year Year 3 Months For Year Ending % of Ending % of Ending % of Ending % of 12/16 Total 12/17 Total 05/18 Total 12/18 Total Salaries & Bonuses Property $0 0.0% $0 0.0% $0 0.0% $0 0.0% Housekeeping $37,954 2.9% $36,610 2.7% $32,756 2.4% $38,719 2.7% Dietary $95,037 7.4% $95,951 7.2% $91,936 6.8% $95,653 6.6% Care Services $527,185 40.8% $561,129 42.0% $543,088 40.0% $605,020 41.7% Activities $42,325 3.3% $37,131 2.8% $12,272 0.9% $35,405 2.4% General & Administrative $589,545 45.6% $606,144 45.3% $676,116 49.9% $674,561 46.5% Marketing $0 0.0% $0 0.0% $0 0.0% $0 0.0% Total Salaries & Bonuses $1,292,046 100.0% $1,336,965 100.0% $1,356,168 100.0% $1,449,358 100.0% Taxes & Benefits Payroll Taxes $121,161 38.5% $122,367 35.0% $123,728 34.7% $133,091 33.6% Group Health/Benefits $80,965 25.7% $119,409 34.1% $129,252 36.3% $139,767 35.2% Pension Plan $6,339 2.0% $8,447 2.4% $864 0.2% $11,882 3.0% Worker's Comp. Ins. $10,815 3.4% $9,955 2.8% $18,348 5.2% $17,583 4.4% Vacation/Holiday/Sickday $82,125 26.1% $77,451 22.1% $67,240 18.9% $80,819 20.4% Other $13,681 4.3% $12,285 3.5% $16,824 4.7% $13,488 3.4% Total Taxes & Benefits $315,086 100.0% $349,914 100.0% $356,256 100.0% $396,630 100.0% Payroll Tax and Benefit Allocation Pricing Structures There are a number of ways in which to price seniors housing services. A brief description of the pricing structures follows: ■ A-La-Carte: Residents are charged a base rate for all basic services. Additional services are charged on an individual need. ■ Tiered Rate: Residents are charged a flat rate for services or a per diem rate based upon their care level. Typically, a need assessment of each resident is performed to determine the care level required for the individual and the amount of staff assistance needed. This structure has been widely accepted by assisted living providers. ■ Flat Rate: Residents are charged a flat fee based on the unit that they occupy. ■ Extensive Agreement: Residents are charged one flat fee regardless of care level – either congregate care, assisted living, or nursing. This is normally found in older life care communities or continuing care retirement communities (CCRCs). The subject has tiered rate pricing. It has a base level additional care on an a la carte basis. Base level services include: ■ Housekeeping, linen changes, and laundry weekly ■ Three meals per day ■ All utilities except telephone and cable ■ Full activities program ■ Scheduled transportation 111 Brookdale Castle Hills Market Rent Analysis In estimating market rent for each unit type, we shall consider the operator’s asking rates for the subject, which are summarized in the following table. The rates shown are for the base level of care. Totals 98 $264,140 Total Annual Gross Potential Rental Income $3,169,680 Semi-Private $9.56Memory Care 284 2 Memory Care 284 4 $3,565 $2,715 $5,430 Private - Shared Bath $20,120 One Bedroom Assisted Living 590 16 $2,935 $4.97 $46,960 Alcove $5.04Assisted Living 499 8 $2,515 $12.55 $14,260 Private Memory Care 284 12 $4,110 $14.47 $49,320 Subject's Rate Structure Unit/Bed Type Care Type Square Feet Number of Units/Beds Monthly Rent Rent Per Square Foot Monthly Gross Potential Income $2,375 $5.70 $61,750 Studio Assisted Living 362 30 $2,210 $6.10 $66,300 Assisted Living 417 26Studio Deluxe Market Rent Survey We have surveyed six facilities that are comparable to the subject. Detailed comparable profiles are included in the Addendum of this report. They are as follows: 112 Brookdale Castle Hills Brookdale Castle Hills: 1207 Jackson Keller Road, San Antonio, Texas 78213 Franklin Park Sonterra: 18323 Sonterra Pl, San Antonio Heartis San Antonio: 15430 Huebner Road, San Antonio Colonial Gardens: 10 Lynn Batts Lane, San Antonio Arden Courts - San Antonio: 15290 Hueber Road, San Antonio The Adante: 2702 Cembalo Boulevard, San Antonio Brookdale San Antonio: 9203 Cinnamon Hills, San Antonio Rent Comparable Location Map 113 Brookdale Castle Hills 20161997 2011 The Adante Heartis San Antonio 10 Lynn Batts Lane, San Antonio Colonial Gardens 2010 19981998 4.7 3.1Miles from Subject 4.57.3 5.4 Year Built (Original) 5.5 Summary of Rental Comparables Element of Comparison Comparable Number 1 2 IL, AL 3 4 5 6 AL, MCMCAL, MC Property Name Franklin Park Sonterra IL, AL, MCMC Brookdale San Antonio Arden Courts - San Antonio Address 18323 Sonterra Pl, San Antonio Levels of Care IL = Independent Living AL = Assisted Living NC = Nursing Care MC = Memory Care 80%100%92% 15430 Huebner Road, San Antonio 15290 Hueber Road, San Antonio 9203 Cinnamon Hills, San Antonio $3,900-$4,400Range of Monthly Rental Rates 94%92% $4,500$3,550-$4,275 Facility Occupancy $1,182$4,000-$6,000 100% $2,550-$4,290 2702 Cembalo Boulevard, San Antonio Adjustment for Concessions Occasionally, properties may offer reduced rents on specific unit types, but concessions are not standardized or widespread. No adjustments are required. Adjustment for Entrance Fees None of the comparables charge significant upfront entrance fees, so no adjustments are required. Adjustment for Size and/or Type Comparables 3, 4, and 6 do not offer an alcove unit type. Therefore, the one bedroom unit type is utilized and adjusted downward 5% in comparison. Comparables 2 and 3 do not offer a semi- private memory care unit. Therefore, the private unit type is utilized and adjusted downward 10% in comparison. Adjustment for Levels of Care The subject has a base rate plus levels of care. All comparables have a similar level of care for assisted living beds when compared to the subject property. No adjustments are needed for this care type. Comparables 2 and 3 rates for memory care beds includes a greater level of care than the subject. Thus, these comparables are adjusted downward $500 per month in comparison to the subject's base rate. Adjustment for Utilities The subject and comparables have similar utility structures, requiring no adjustments. Adjustment for Meals The subject and the comparables all provide similar meal plans. No adjustments are needed. 114 Brookdale Castle Hills Adjustment for Housekeeping The comparables and subject all provide regular housekeeping in the base rates. No adjustments are needed. Adjustment for Parking The comparables all include open surface parking in the base rates. Carports and garages, when available, are rented for additional charges. No adjustments are needed. Adjustment for Location Comparables are located in superior locations when compared to the subject property. A downward adjustment of 10% is deemed reasonable. Adjustment for Age/Quality/Condition Comparables 1, 3 and 4 are considerably more modern, attractive facilities when compared to the subject property. An adjustment downward by 15% is deemed reasonable. Summary of Adjustments Adjustment grids for each subject unit type follow. In the grids, each subject unit is compared to the most similar unit for each comparable. 115 Brookdale Castle Hills $0 $0 $0 - $0 - ($255) $0 Adjustment for Meals - $0 Adjustment for Age/Quality/Condition - ($600) -($585) - JLL Market Rent Conclusion Per SF $8.60 $0 - Adjustment for Location ($355) - ($400) Adjustment for Parking $0 Adjusted Rent Per SF $6.66 Size (Square Feet) 400 Comparable Name Franklin Park Sonterra Studio - Studio $0 - $0 $0 - $0 $0 - ($390) - $0 - $0 $0 - Adjustment for Concessions $0 - $0 - $0 $0 - $0Adjustment for Size/Type $0 -Monthly Rent $3,000 $2,925 ($533) - $0 Rental Comparable Adjustment Table For Assisted Living Studio 362 SF Item Comparable Number 1 2 3 4 65 $2,550 $0 $3,900 - Studio Heartis San Antonio - - 371 340 286- Arden Courts - San Antonio Brookdale San Antonio Studio $6.10 JLL Market Rent Conclusion $2,325 $2,721 Average Adjusted Rent Per SF $7.84 Adjusted Monthly Rent $2,663 - - $0 $0 $0 $8.02 Colonial Gardens The Adante Unit Type $8.09 $3,550 - - - $4,000 Adjustment for Levels of Care $0 $0 Adjustment for Utilities $0 Adjustment for Entrance Fees $0 $0 $2,295 -Adjustment for Housekeeping $0 Quoted Rent $2,210 Average Adjusted Rent Quoted Rent Per SF $6.42 The comparables’ adjusted rental rates range between $2,295 and $3,000 per month, with a mean of $2,721 per month. The subject has 30 of this unit type, and 20 are occupied at rents ranging from $1,725 to $3,536 with an average of $2,262. Considering the adjusted rents and the rents in place, the current quoted rental rate of $2,210 appears to be slightly low. We will utilize a market rent of $2,295 in our forecast. 116 Brookdale Castle Hills Adjusted Monthly Rent Adjusted Rent Per SF Quoted Rent $2,375 $2,663 - Average Adjusted Rent Item Comparable Number - Rental Comparable Adjustment Table For Assisted Living Studio Deluxe 417 SF Monthly Rent $3,550 - $4,000 286 Unit Type Studio Studio 340 Comparable Name Franklin Park Sonterra Colonial Gardens The Adante Heartis San Antonio Arden Courts - San Antonio $2,550 1 2 3 4 65 Adjustment for Concessions $0 - $0 $0 - $0 $3,900 - Studio -- Studio Brookdale San Antonio Adjustment for Entrance Fees $0 - $0 -Size (Square Feet) 400 - 371 $0 $0 - $0 $0 - - $0 $0 - $0 $0 $0 $0 - Adjustment for Levels of Care $0 - $0 $0 Adjustment for Utilities $0 - Adjustment for Meals $0 - Adjustment for Size/Type $0 - $0 $0 $0Adjustment for Housekeeping $0 - ($400)Adjustment for Location Adjustment for Parking $0 ($355) - ($255) -$0 ($390) - $0$0 $0 -$0 - Average Adjusted Rent Per SF $7.84 - $8.02$8.09 $8.60$6.66 $0 $2,295$2,925 ($600) - - ($585) $3,000 Adjustment for Age/Quality/Condition -($533) $2,721 JLL Market Rent Conclusion Per SF $6.12 Quoted Rent Per SF $5.70 JLL Market Rent Conclusion $2,550 The comparables’ adjusted rental rates range between $2,295 and $3,000 per month, with a mean of $2,721 per month. The subject has 26 of this unit type, and 16 are occupied at rents ranging from $1,938 to $3,082 with an average of $2,462. Considering the adjusted rents and the rents in place, the current quoted rental rate of $2,375 appears to be low. We will utilize a market rent of $2,550 in our forecast. 117 Brookdale Castle Hills Adjustment for Parking Adjustment for Levels of Care $0 $0 - $0 $0- $0 - $0 ($337) $2,675 JLL Market Rent Conclusion Per SF $5.36 JLL Market Rent Conclusion Comparable Name Rental Comparable Adjustment Table For Assisted Living Alcove 499 SF Item Comparable Number 1 2 3 4 5 6 Brookdale San Antonio Adjustment for Concessions $0 Adjustment for Entrance Fees $0 - $0 469 Monthly Rent $3,550 - $4,250 $4,000 - $3,370 Size (Square Feet) 400 Arden Courts - San Antonio Colonial Gardens The Adante 462 - Franklin Park Sonterra - 474 Heartis San Antonio Unit Type Studio - One Bedroom One Bedroom - One Bedroom $0 $0 - $0 $0 - $0 $0 - $0 $0$0 - $0 $0$0 - - ($169)($200) - Adjustment for Location ($355) $0 - ($425) - $0 $0$0 - ($400) - - Adjusted Monthly Rent Adjusted Rent Per SF Adjustment for Utilities $0 $0 -Adjustment for Meals $0 Adjustment for Housekeeping $2,800 -$2,663 - $2,975 -$6.66 - $6.28 $6.06 Adjustment for Age/Quality/Condition ($533) - ($638) ($600) - $0 $6.11 $2,515 $2,865 $5.04 Average Adjusted Rent $2,826 Average Adjusted Rent Per SF Quoted Rent Quoted Rent Per SF $6.28 - ($213)Adjustment for Size/Type $0 The comparables’ adjusted rental rates range between $2,663 and $2,975 per month, with a mean of $2,826 per month. The subject has 8 of this unit type, and 5 are occupied at rents ranging from $2,301 to $2,969 with an average of $2,558. Considering the adjusted rents and the rents in place, the current quoted rental rate of $2,515 appears to be low. We will utilize a market rent of $2,675 in our forecast. 118 Brookdale Castle Hills Rental Comparable Adjustment Table For Assisted Living One Bedroom 590 SF Colonial Gardens The Adante 4 5 Arden Courts - San Antonio Brookdale San Antonio Heartis San Antonio Comparable Name Franklin Park Sonterra 1 2 3 $0 - 462 - Item Comparable Number 6 One BedroomOne Bedroom --Unit Type One Bedroom One Bedroom $0- - Size (Square Feet) Adjustment for Entrance Fees $0 $4,275 520 Adjustment for Concessions $0 - $0 $0 $0 - $0 Monthly Rent $4,000 - $0 600- 474 $4,250 $3,630 Adjustment for Housekeeping $0 - $0 $0 - $0 Adjustment for Meals $0 - $0 $0 - $0 $0 Adjustment for Utilities $0 - $0 $0 $0 - $0 $0 Adjustment for Levels of Care $0 $0 -- - $0 $0 -- $0 Adjusted Monthly Rent $3,206 - $3,188 Adjustment for Age/Quality/Condition ($641) $0 Adjustment for Location ($428) - ($425) ($400) - ($363) Adjustment for Parking $0 - $0 $3,267$3,000 - ($600) - $5.08 $6.17 - ($638) - Average Adjusted Rent $3,165 $5.45Adjusted Rent Per SF $6.49 -$6.72 Average Adjusted Rent Per SF $6.21 Quoted Rent $2,935 $0Adjustment for Size/Type $3,000 JLL Market Rent Conclusion Per SF Quoted Rent Per SF $4.97 JLL Market Rent Conclusion The comparables’ adjusted rental rates range between $3,000 and $3,267 per month, with a mean of $3,165 per month. The subject has 16 of this unit type, and 12 are occupied at rents ranging from $2,422 to $3,889 with an average of $2,930. Considering the adjusted rents and the rents in place, the current quoted rental rate of $2,935 appears to be low. We will utilize a market rent of $3,000 in our forecast. 119 Brookdale Castle Hills $0 Adjustment for Meals - $0 $0 $0 - $0 $0 Brookdale San Antonio Franklin Park Sonterra Heartis San Antonio Arden Courts - San Antonio Colonial Gardens The Adante 5 Item 6 322 - 313 Adjustment for Levels of Care - ($500) Adjustment for Concessions - $0 $0 Unit Type Private Private -Private Monthly Rent - $4,500 $6,000 - Private- $0 $0 - $0 $0 - $0 $0 $0 Adjustment for Size/Type - Adjustment for Entrance Fees $0 - $0 - ($500) $0 $0 Adjustment for Utilities - Adjustment for Housekeeping - $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Adjustment for Location - ($450) ($600) ($429) Adjustment for Parking - $0 - $0 - ($400) - $0 Adjusted Rent Per SF - - $17.02 - $3,861 ($600) - $9.32 - $12.34 Adjustment for Age/Quality/Condition - $0 ($900) $0 Adjusted Monthly Rent - $3,550 $4,000 $3,000 Average Adjusted Rent Per SF $12.89 Quoted Rent Per SF $14.47 Quoted Rent $4,110 Average Adjusted Rent $3,603 $4,150 JLL Market Rent Conclusion Per SF $14.61 Comparable Name - - 1 2 3 4 $0 - $0 $0 - Comparable Number Rental Comparable Adjustment Table For Memory Care Private 284 SF Size (Square Feet) $4,000 235 $4,290 JLL Market Rent Conclusion The comparables’ adjusted rental rates range between $3,000 and $4,000 per month, with a mean of $3,603 per month. The subject has 12 of this unit type, and 11 are occupied at rents ranging from $3,309 to $6,538 with an average of $4,147. Considering the adjusted rents and the rents in place, the current quoted rental rate of $4,110 appears to be reasonable. We will utilize a market rent of $4,150 in our forecast. 120 Brookdale Castle Hills - - $3,861$3,000 Adjusted Rent Per SF $0 ($400) - Adjustment for Meals - $0 Adjustment for Housekeeping - $0 $0 $0 - $0 51 2 Arden Courts - San Antonio 3 4 The Adante 235 Brookdale San Antonio Colonial Gardens 6 Adjustment for Utilities - $0 $0 $0 -- $4,500 $6,000 $4,290 Adjustment for Concessions - $0 $0 $0 Private Comparable Name Size (Square Feet) - 322 - Unit Type - -Private Private Private Franklin Park Sonterra 313 Heartis San Antonio Adjustment for Levels of Care - $0 $0 $0 - $0 ($429) - $0 - ($500) $0 $0 - $0 $0 $0 ($500) $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 ($900) ($600) - - Average Adjusted Rent Per SF Quoted Rent Quoted Rent Per SF Average Adjusted Rent $3,603 $9.32 $12.55 $3,565 Adjustment for Parking - $0 $0 Adjustment for Location - ($450) - ($600) $12.89 $3,565 Adjustment for Age/Quality/Condition - - $17.02 $12.34 Adjusted Monthly Rent - $4,000$3,550 JLL Market Rent Conclusion JLL Market Rent Conclusion Per SF $12.55 - - Rental Comparable Adjustment Table For Memory Care Private - Shared Bath 284 SF Item Comparable Number Adjustment for Entrance Fees - - $0 Monthly Rent $4,000 Adjustment for Size/Type - $0 $0 The comparables’ adjusted rental rates range between $3,000 and $4,000 per month, with a mean of $3,603 per month. The subject has 4 of this unit type, and 4 are occupied at rents ranging from $2,805 to $4,440 with an average of $3,406. Considering the adjusted rents and the rents in place, the current quoted rental rate of $3,565 appears to be reasonable. We will utilize a market rent of $3,565 in our forecast. 121 Brookdale Castle Hills $0 6 $3,500 $0 $0 $0 $0 Rental Comparable Adjustment Table For Memory Care Semi-Private 284 SF Heartis San Antonio Arden Courts - San Antonio 4 5 Comparable Name Franklin Park Sonterra Colonial Gardens The Adante Brookdale San Antonio Semi-PrivatePrivate Item Comparable Number 1 2 3 Semi-Private Adjustment for Entrance Fees - $0 $0 Adjustment for Size/Type - Adjustment for Levels of Care - Unit Type - 286 Monthly Rent - $4,500 $6,000 $1,182 - $0 $0($600) Adjustment for Housekeeping - $0 $0$0 $0 Adjustment for Utilities - $0 Adjustment for Parking - $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Adjustment for Meals - $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Adjustment for Location - ($450) ($600) Adjusted Monthly Rent - $3,100 $3,400 Adjustment for Age/Quality/Condition - ($400) ($118) $0 $0 ($350) ($600) $0 JLL Market Rent Conclusion $14.47 $5.17 Average Adjusted Rent $2,743 Average Adjusted Rent Per SF $10.22 Quoted Rent $2,715 $2,750 $0 ($900) $3,000 $1,064 Quoted Rent Per SF $3,150 Adjusted Rent Per SF - - - JLL Market Rent Conclusion Per SF $9.68 235 $0 $0 $0 $0$0 Private Semi-Private Adjustment for Concessions - Size (Square Feet) - $4,000 ($450) ($500) ($500) 580 $0 $9.56 - $0 $11.01 The comparables’ adjusted rental rates range between $1,064 and $3,400 per month, with a mean of $2,743 per month. The subject has 2 of this unit type, and 1 is occupied at $2,585 per month. Considering the adjusted rents and the rents in place, the current quoted rental rate of $2,715 appears to be reasonable. We will utilize a market rent of $2,715 in our forecast. 122 Brookdale Castle Hills Rent Roll Summary The subject’s rent roll summary along with our market rent conclusions are as follows: Unit Type Mix Units Occupied Square Footage Average Rent In Place Minimum Rent In Place Maximum Rent In Place Asking Rent JLL Conclusion Assisted Living Studio 30 20 362 $2,262 $1,725 $3,536 $2,210 $2,325 Assisted Living Studio Deluxe 26 16 417 $2,462 $1,938 $3,082 $2,375 $2,550 Assisted Living Alcove 8 5 499 $2,558 $2,301 $2,969 $2,515 $2,675 Assisted Living One Bedroom 16 12 590 $2,930 $2,422 $3,889 $2,935 $3,000 Memory Care Private 12 11 284 $4,147 $3,309 $6,538 $4,110 $4,150 Memory Care Private - Shared Bath 4 4 284 $3,406 $2,805 $4,440 $3,565 $3,565 Memory Care Semi- Private 2 1 284 $2,585 $2,585 $2,585 $2,715 $2,750 Rent Roll Summary Occupancy, Concessions, Collection Losses, Loss to Leases Resident Day Occupancy The subject’s reported occupancy is as follows: Resident Day Occupancy Year Ending 12/17 36,865 25,227 68.4% Item 12/16 Year Ending Annual 36,865 Actual Resident Days 25,27823,638 25,116 Budget 3 Months For Year Potential Resident Days Occupancy Percent 64.1% 68.6% 68.1% Ending Ending 05/18 12/18 36,865 36,865 Occupancy at the subject property has lagged that of the market. Management noted that its location and layout are the two biggest factors impacting occupancy. The majority of incoming residents cannot live on the second floor due to evacuation restrictions; therefore, the second floor units are difficult to lease-up. In addition, the subject’s location and visibility is inferior to competing properties in the market. Market Area Occupancy As noted in the supply and demand analysis, the subject’s PMA has weighted average occupancy as shown below: 123 Brookdale Castle Hills Franklin Park Sonterra 1 92% 180 - 1 8 100% 8 12 92% 11 15430 Huebner Rd, San Antonio, TX Arden Courts - San Antonio 15290 Huebner Rd, San Antonio, TX Heartis San Antonio 72 22 80% 18 7 94% 7 Brookdale Castle Hills 12078 Jackson Keller Rd, San Antonio, TX Property Name Current Occupancy % Number of Occupied Beds 101 71% 2702 Cembalo Blvd, San Antonio, TX Brookdale San Antonio 9203 Cinnamon Hl, San Antonio, TX 10 Lynn Batts Ln, San Antonio, TX Weighted Average Occupancy of Competitive Assisted Living 29 100% 29 Colonial Gardens The Adante 18323 Sonterra Pl, San Antonio, TX Number of Competitive Beds TOTALS 145 WEIGHTED AVERAGE OCCUPANCY AVERAGE OCCUPANCY REPORTED BY NIC 80% - 75% 51 - 47 TOTALS 8 100% 8 4 92% 4 Arden Courts - San Antonio 15290 Huebner Rd, San Antonio, TX Heartis San Antonio 15430 Huebner Rd, San Antonio, TX 6 80% 5 7 94% 7 2702 Cembalo Blvd, San Antonio, TX The Adante Property Name Brookdale Castle Hills 8 100% 8 Colonial Gardens 10 Lynn Batts Ln, San Antonio, TX 9203 Cinnamon Hl, San Antonio, TX Brookdale San Antonio 1207 Jackson Keller Rd, San Antonio, TX Weighted Average Occupancy of Competitive Memory Care Number of Competitive Beds Current Occupancy % Number of Occupied Beds 18 89% 16 WEIGHTED AVERAGE OCCUPANCY AVERAGE OCCUPANCY REPORTED BY NIC 92% - 75% The subject’s occupancy compares to the broader market as illustrated in the following table: 124 Brookdale Castle Hills Segment Assisted Living Memory Care MSA 76.0% 76.0% Submarket 73.9% 73.9% Rent Comparables 92.6% 94.1% All Facilities in PMA 75.0% 75.0% Subject 71.0% 89.0% Market Occupancy Summary National Occupancy Data NIC MAP reports the following occupancy levels for the recent past in 99 primary and secondary markets. These are indicative of national trends. 3Q 2013 4Q 2013 1Q 2014 2Q 2014 3Q 2014 4Q 2014 1Q 2015 2Q 2015 3Q 2015 4Q 2015 1Q 2016 2Q 2016 3Q 2016 4Q 2016 1Q 2017 2Q 2017 3Q 2017 4Q 2017 1Q 2018 Majority Independent Living 90.2% 90.6% 90.8% 91.0% 91.2% 91.6% 91.4% 91.4% 91.5% 91.7% 91.6% 91.4% 91.6% 91.7% 91.6% 91.4% 91.4% 91.5% 91.1% Majority Assisted Living 90.7% 90.6% 90.6% 90.7% 91.1% 91.1% 90.4% 90.2% 90.4% 90.4% 90.1% 89.8% 89.7% 89.7% 89.2% 88.7% 88.7% 88.6% 87.9% Majority Nursing 87.8% 88.0% 88.4% 88.2% 88.2% 88.2% 88.4% 87.8% 87.5% 87.3% 87.4% 87.0% 87.1% 86.8% 87.1% 86.4% 86.1% 86.1% 86.5% CCRC 89.8% 90.1% 90.3% 90.4% 90.6% 90.8% 90.9% 90.9% 90.8% 91.0% 91.0% 90.7% 90.7% 90.9% 91.2% 91.3% 91.1% 91.2% 91.1% 86% 87% 88% 89% 90% 91% 92% A ve ra ge O cc up an cy Quarter Occupancy Levels - NIC MAP 99 Markets 125 Brookdale Castle Hills Forecasted Stabilized Occupancy The subject is a good quality asset located in a market with high occupancy levels. The metro market average for assisted living is 76% according to NIC MAP, and the average of the rent comparables is 93%. However, three of the rent comparables are superior in age/condition and all are superior in location. Occupancy at the subject property has lagged that of the market. Management noted that its location and layout are the two biggest factors impacting occupancy. The majority of incoming residents cannot live on the second floor due to evacuation restrictions; therefore, the second floor units are difficult to lease-up. In addition, the subject’s location and visibility is inferior to competing properties in the market. Considering all the preceding factors, our stabilized occupancy conclusion is 80.0%. Thus, our forecast of resident days is as follows: X = X = X = X =101 Forecasted Resident Days 365 Potential Resident Days Forecasted OccupancyOperating Beds Calculation of Forecasted Resident Days 36,865 80.0% Days In A Year 29,492 Concessions/Loss to Leases Review of the rent roll indicates that rents in place total $2,332,896. This compares to market rent for the same beds of $2,392,020. Thus, rents in place lag market rents by 2.5%. Some of this variance will be absorbed over the coming year by rental rate increases upon rollover of the existing tenant base. Historically, this has ranged from 10.4% to 15.5% with an average of 12.5%. Thus, a market concession/loss to lease forecast of 5.0% is used in our analysis. Additional Meals/Care Income Meals The subject provides three meals per day and does not generate any income from additional meals; therefore, no additional meal income is forecast. Additional Care/Level of Care Income The subject has additional care on an a la carte basis. The subject has generated income from additional meals/care of $15.81 to $23.35 prd. Our forecast of $21.87 prd is reasonable based upon the subject’s financials. 4 Average 41,846 30,532 $634,826 $363,888 $15.17 $10.38 2 3 Annual $9,431 23,993 25,116Resident Days 31,883 25,27825,227 $590,300 $485,239$373,631$53,691 $507,296 $23.35$15.81 $19.32$20.11 Year 23,638 29,492 3 Months Ending Ending 12/16 12/18 Ending 12/17 Year Ending For Year 05/18 Additional Meals/Care Comparison Item Income & Expense Comparables Subject JLL Pro Forma Budget $645,000 Additional Meals/Care Income PRD $21.87$23.76 $2.20 $0.39 1 24,407 Additional Meals/Care Income $757,603 126 Brookdale Castle Hills Commercial Income As noted in the improvement analysis, the subject has a beauty salon which generates commercial income. Our forecast of commercial income is as follows: 30,532 $7,968 $13,736 $0.19 $0.52 4 Average 25,278 $19,024 2 Ending 25,227 Year Budget For Year Commercial Income Comparison Annual Item Income & Expense Comparables 1 3 Ending $20,000 23,638 $22,722 $17,204 Subject 12/16 12/17 3 Months 41,846 JLL Pro Forma05/18 Ending 12/18 Ending 24,407 23,993 Year 25,116 $44,279 $181 $21,797 $0.96 $0.68 $0.75Commercial Income PRD $0.08 $1.81 $0.01 Commercial Income 29,492 $0.87 Resident Days 31,883 $2,515 $0.68 Parking Income The subject has no sources of parking income so none is forecast. Assessment/Community Fee The following table summarizes the policy of the subject and comparables in the subject’s market area. Franklin Park Sonterra Subject - Brookdale Castle Hills $1,750-$2,000 $2,000 Brookdale San Antonio $2,500 Arden Courts - San Antonio JLL Fee Conclusion $1,550 $500 Heartis San Antonio $1,500 Property Name Colonial Gardens $2,000 The Adante $2,000 Summary of Assessment/Community Fees Amount Based upon this data, a community fee of $1,550 is forecast for the subject. Turnover rate data from The State of Seniors Housing 2017 is as follows: 127 Brookdale Castle Hills Annual Resident Turnover Rates Community Type Lower Quartile Median Upper Quartile Independent Living 22.9% 37.4% 51.2% Independent/Assisted 27.7% 41.7% 59.7% IALF/ALZ 28.1% 39.7% 66.6% Assisted Living 34.8% 54.1% 84.8% Assisted Living/ALZ 38.9% 56.1% 84.2% CCRCs 7.1% 21.5% 38.7% Source: State of Seniors Housing 2017 The following table summarizes our anticipated income from assessment/entry fees for the subject property on a stabilized basis. The turnover rate is based upon the data from The State of Seniors Housing 2017. X = X = X = X = Net Annual Assessment/ Community Fee Income Calculation of Assessment/Community Fee Income Annual Turnover Rate Annual Turnover of Beds Beds/Units (Second Person Beds Excluded) Assessment/ Community Fee Per Unit/Bed $60,45098 40% 39 $1,550 The total number of beds used for the calculation excludes Second Person beds. Our forecast of $2.05 prd is reasonable based on the subject’s financial activity that ranged from $1.19 to $2.17 prd. 41,846 30,532 $75,902 $59,663 4 Average $47,500 23,993 05/1812/17 Year Annual Item $1.81 $2.02$1.36 $3.96 $50,834 $60,450 25,116 29,492 $2.17 $1.19 12/16 Ending 12/18 $0.95 $1.88 Entrance/Community Fee Income $43,397 $96,666 25,27825,227Resident Days 3 Months $22,686 1 2 3 31,883 24,407 Ending $2.02 Ending Year Ending $29,925 23,638 Budget For Year JLL Pro Forma $2.05 $51,211 Entrance/Community Fee Income PRD Income & Expense Comparables Entrance/Community Fee Income Comparison Subject 128 Brookdale Castle Hills Second Person Charges The facility charges a second person fee for occupancy of a unit by a second person related to the primary occupancy. Second person charges for the subject and comparables are as follows: Colonial Gardens The Adante Heartis San Antonio Arden Courts - San Antonio N/A $1,000 $795 N/A $750 $800 Assisted Living Franklin Park Sonterra $800 Property Name Type Summary of Second Person Fees Subject - Brookdale Castle Hills $800 Brookdale San Antonio JLL Second Person Fee Conclusion According to the rent roll, the subject had 3 persons paying second person fees. X = X = X = X = Type Net Annual Second Persons Income 3Assisted Living $2,400 Number of Months Monthly Fee For Second Persons $800 Calculation of Second Persons Income 12 $28,800 TOTAL $28,800 $2,400 3 Number of Second Persons Net Monthly Second Persons Income Based on the subject’s financials that ranged from $0.55 to $2.05 prd, our conclusion $0.98 prd is deemed reasonable. $1.02 $3.23 $12,951 4 Average 41,846 30,532 $3,391 $47,009 $0.08 $1.85 23,638Resident Days Second Persons Income PRD $0.40 For Year 3 12/16 Year 3 Months 25,227 25,278 $3.05 $73,279 23,993 $51,696 $10,104 Ending $28,800 $0.98$0.55 Year 05/18 Ending $2.05 $78,920 31,883 Second Persons Income $32,445 $0.77 $19,403 25,116 12/18 Ending 12/17 Ending Annual 29,492 Subject JLL Pro Forma Budget Second Persons Income Comparison Item Income & Expense Comparables 1 2 24,407 129 Brookdale Castle Hills Other Income In addition to the foregoing, the subject is expected to realize other income from ancillary sources such as late fees, insufficient funds, forfeited deposits, vending, guest meals, cleaning fees, tray service, unscheduled transportation for residents, etc. The following table shows other income for the subject and the income and expense comparables. 41,846 30,53224,407 $2,258 $11,384 $0.05 $0.40 4 Average Other Income Comparison Item $11,544 $17,500 $0.59$0.67 SubjectIncome & Expense Comparables 3 Ending $0.46$0.26 $0.45 $0.58Other Income PRD $0.82 $0.49 Year Ending 12/17 $16,828Other Income $26,000 $6,452 $10,825 $13,595 $12,436 Resident Days 29,49231,883 Ending 12/16 Ending 05/18 3 MonthsYear Annual 1 2 For Year 25,11623,993 25,227 25,27823,638 JLL Pro Forma Budget 12/18 Other income is forecast at $0.59 prd or $17,500 annually. As the data is based upon reported actual income, after vacancy, the other income is not subject to vacancy and collection losses. 130 Brookdale Castle Hills Estimate of Effective Gross Income Utilizing the preceding estimates, total effective gross income for the subject is now calculated: Total Effective Gross Income $3,279,841 Plus Second Persons $28,800 Plus Other Income $17,500 $3,300,120 Less Vacancy and Collection Losses 20.0% ($660,024) $60,450Plus Entrance/Community Fee Income $645,000 Plus Commercial Income $20,000 Plus Parking Income $2,508,091 Rental Income Net of Vacancy and Collection Losses $2,640,096 Effective Gross Rental Income $0 Plus Additional Meals/Care Income $275,010Totals Less Concessions/Loss to Leases 5.0% ($132,005) Annual Gross Potential Unit Rental Income 98 $9.68 $12.55 $3,565 284 2 $2,750 $5,500 Semi-Private Memory Care $14,260 Private Memory Care 284 12 $4,150 $14.61 $49,800 Private - Shared Bath Memory Care 284 4 $5.36 $6.12 $2,550 499 8 $2,675 $21,400 One Bedroom Assisted Living 590 16 $3,000 $5.08 $48,000 Alcove Assisted Living $66,300 Studio Assisted Living 362 30 $2,325 $6.42 $69,750 Studio Deluxe Assisted Living 417 26 Unit/Bed Type Care Type Square Feet Number of Units/Beds Monthly Rent Estimate of Effective Gross Income (Stabilized, Untrended Basis) Rent Per Square Foot Monthly Gross Potential Income The preceding estimate is in current, untrended dollars and is based upon stabilized operations for the 12 months following the date of value. In the following table, the subject’s income conclusions are compared to actual realized income (trended) for similar income and expense comparables. 131 Brookdale Castle Hills ($39,036) $634,826 $7,968 $0 $75,902 $3,391 $2,258 $4,685,210 $95.59 $0.00 ($0.93) $15.17 1.8% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 0.4% 0.6% 100.0% 100.0% 0.3% 100.0% 0.4% 100.0%100.0% 1.8% $19,024 $2.05 Other Income Total Income $0.08 ($3.13) $23.35 $0.68 ($11.90) $1.19 $3,867,486 $97.73 $106.10 $2,919,697 $11,384 $3,279,841 $111.90 $19.32 Second Persons $12,436 ($13.61) $19,403 $0.75$0.96 $17,500 Entrance/Community Fees $51,211 $0.19 $114.15 1.1% 0.0% $78,920 $73,279 $0.00 $1.36 $23.76 $0.00$0.00 $2.20 ($7.74) $118.66 0.0% 8.3%17.8% $133.82 17.4% 0.6% $0.77 $128.65 $0.40 $0.00 $1.81 $0.08 $0.05 $0.00 $1.81 $0.01 0.2% $0.98 $2.17 $111.21 0.0% 100.0% 0.7% 0.6% 0.2% 0.4% $1.88 $0.00 $0.59 $0.00 $0.00 1.3% $0.00 $0.40 $2.02 0.0% $3.96 98.6% 0.0% $1.02 $0.95 85.2% $0.00 $2.02 $0.52 0.1% $0.55 $0.58 $3.23 $0.82 $166.22 13.3% -2.3% -15.5% $102.58 0.0% 85.6% 93.5% 95.3% $111.96 85.4% 0.0% -0.8% $0.46 1.0% 2.4% -5.8% -0.4% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% $0.49 0.7% -10.4% 100.0% 1.6% 0.1% 91.7% $115.74 1.0% 0.5% 0.0% 20.5% 1.4% 0.0% 17.6% Total Income % 0.9% 0.5% 0.0% 0.3% 0.0% -10.8% 1.8% 0.8% Less Conc./Loss to Leases % 1.6% Other Income % Commercial % Entrance/Community Fees % 0.8% 1.9%Second Persons % 0.0% 0.0% -11.8% Rental Income % Less Vacancy & Coll Loss % Less Vacancy & Coll Loss PRD 3.0% 89.9% 0.9% Entrance/Community Fees PRD ($0.71) 13.5% $0.00 $10.38 $15.81 $20.11 Commercial PRD Parking PRD Parking % 0.0% $0.00 Second Persons PRD Other Income PRD 1.5% $1.85 0.0% 0.0% Additional Meals/Care % 0.4% $0.26 $0.45 Total Income PRD $3.05 Income Comparison 29,492 Income & Expense Comparables Ending 25,116 Ending 3 Months Budget For YearYear Average 12/17 Annual Commercial Parking Rental Income Additional Meals/Care Less Vacancy & Coll Loss ($17,312) ($101,019) $363,888 $20,000 $0 ($435,067) $0 $0 $0 12/16 Item $181 $2,459,592 ($660,024) ($132,005) $2,478,584 $0 ($298,882) $0 Resident Days ($246,710) Ending $3,447,572 ($299,324) Rental Income PRD $4,266,590 $47,009$32,445 $115.82 $2,461,142 $10,825 $59,663 $13,736$44,279 $53,691 $2,804,782 $6,452 $114.52 $22,686 $29,925 $28,800$10,104 1 $13,595 05/18 25,278 $590,300 $0 $485,239 $21,797 $0 $50,834 $60,450 $0 ($343,243) 23,638 $373,631 $22,722 $17,204 $507,296 24,407 Year 30,532 $3,794,308 23,993 $3,651,339 $9,431 $3,300,120 $96,666 $2,765,739 $0 $2,344,739 25,227 $2,676,676 Less Conc./Loss to Leases $757,603 $0 $0 4 41,846 $0.39Additional Meals/Care PRD Less Conc./Loss to Leases PRD $155.46 $0.00 $4,057,004 $26,000 $0.00 $43,397 $0$0 $2,515 $0 ($18.41) $12,951 $117.00 31,883 $3,999,901 $0 0.0% 32 Ending Subject JLL Pro Forma $0.00 0.8% $645,000 $0.00 12/18 $0.00 $97.30 $51,696 ($4.48) $0.68 $21.87 $47,500 ($22.38) $2,885,616 $16,828 $0.87 ($11.84) $0 $11,544 $2,759,220 100.6%89.8% $109.86 19.7% -4.0% 0.4% 0.6% 0.5% -20.1% 1.8% $0.67 $2.05 $98.68 The subject’s forecasted total income per resident day falls within the range of the expense comparables. 132 Brookdale Castle Hills Operating Expenses We will now forecast operating expenses for the subject on a stabilized basis. Income and Expense Comparables In forecasting income and expenses, we will rely upon the subject’s figures. We will also rely upon expense data derived from income and expense comparables. Each is similar to the subject in location, design, and rate structure. The data for the income and expense comparables has been trended to the current year at an annual rate of 2.5% per year. The averages present consist of those numbers greater than zero. The comparables are profiled as follows: Item Comparable 1 Comparable 2 Comparable 3 Comparable 4 City Dallas Georgetown Nacogdoches San Antonio State Texas Texas Texas Texas Year Built/Year Renovated 1994 2013 1990; 2016 1997; 2014 Units 95 80 59 116 Beds 99 83 71 128 IL Beds 0 0 0 0 AL Beds 71 61 55 98 MC Beds 24 22 16 30 Average Occupancy 88.23% 80.56% 92.58% 89.57% Operating Year End Data 07/31/16 05/31/15 02/28/18 05/31/15 Income and Expense Comparables Expenses In the analysis to follow, we will give limited consideration to the subject’s expenses reported previously. The subject has not been operating on a stabilized basis with expenses higher than market comparables. In addition, the subject’s historical wages and salaries data are aggregated into “exempt” and “nonexempt” categories, although some individual departmental salaries and wages are reported. As such, we have forecast salaries and wages by department based on the income and expense comparables, with consideration given to the available historical data as appropriate. 133 Brookdale Castle Hills Property Expenses Property expenses typically include all operating property items such as maintenance staff expenses, utilities, property taxes, ground or facility rent, minor repairs, upkeep and maintenance costs, supplies, and grounds keeping expenses. In the insurance expense, we have included both property insurance, including fire and extended coverage, and liability insurance. $80,723 $3.55 $1.93 1.7% 0.3% Total Property Expense PRD 2.7% 4.2% $20.46 5.7% 0.0% 0.1% 1.7% 5.5% 3.2% 18.3% 0.0% Ground/Facility Rent PRD $0.00 $0.00 $0.01 $3.51 0.1% $0.00 6.1% 1.7% 3.3% 4.1% 2.1%0.6% $18.21 $26.20 Ground/Facility Rent % 0.0% Insurance (Prop.& Liability) % 1.6% 0.0%0.0% 0.0% $26.82 1.3%Wages % 0.0%0.0% 5.3% 1.5% 3.4%Utilities % 0.0% Real Estate Taxes/Sp. Assess. % 4.6% 6.8% Payroll Taxes/Benefits % 0.1% $1.85 $0.10 $1.89 $122,975 $102,941 $63,819 $202 $0 Wages Insurance (Prop.& Liability) PRD $3.50 0.0% $0.37 2.7% $163 $0 Real Estate Taxes/Special Assess. $198,207 $276,205 Utilities $81,290 $259,014 1.2% 0.0% $3,542 $328,899 $2.61 $0.00 $10,590 $4.29 $0.83 5.5% 1.0% $6.47 1.3% $5.25 $0.13 $234,622 $240,297 $3,279,841 $48,500 4 41,846 $0 $4,685,210Total Income $4,266,590 $2,804,782 $54,144 $43,671 $6.22Real Estate Taxes/Sp. Assess. PRD Total Property Expense $0.05 $15,312 $856,132 $6.41 $0.00 $0.08 $1.94 $6.19 $176,750 $0 $268,063 $23.20 6.0% $4,057,004 $51,686 $0.41 $0.15 Utilities PRD $5.54 $5.55 $2.26 $3,318 0.0% $580,491 5.8% 1.3%0.0% 6.9% 0.0% 0.0% Building R&M, Supplies & Other % 2.9% 2.6% 2.2% 0.0% $0.05 $6.69 $0 $107,894 $1.84 $148,412 $0 Average $3,867,486 $154,833 $2,576 $160,488 $8.79 YearYear $2,759,220 $633,967 $0 $586,468 12/18 25,116 $222,260 $46,440 0.0% $8.88 $1.65 $19.64 $0.32 $6.93 $3.21 $0 Subject Annual Property Expense Comparison Resident Days 31,883 $3.50 1.5% 0.1%0.1%0.1% 0.0% 0.0% $0.00 $6.35 $1.90 1.6% $0.00 $0.12 $8.21 $0.00 $0.00 3.1% $154,704 $5.20 $0.04 12/17 $48,037 $103,222 25,278 Ending $0 $55,854 $0 $0 $0.00$0.00 $176,681 $3,116 $174,890 $2,885,616 Ending Ending $42,763 29,492 $601,574 $8,125 JLL Pro Forma $6.12 $1.64 $0.00 $9.34 $3,379 $211,354 $163,875 $1,296 $75,856 $159,556 $612,067 $1,340 $2,919,697 For Year $168,037 $46,473 $152,962 05/18 23,638 12/16 25,227 3 Months $84,219 1 2 Ground/Facility Rent Ending $209,849 $47,580 $7.06 $9,893 Item Income & Expense Comparables 24,407 23,993 30,532 3 $2,461,142 Insurance (Prop.& Liability) $26,622 $1,678Licenses $135,515 $0 $106,045 $0.00 Building R&M, Supplies & Other PRD $3.86 Wages PRD $1.37 $6.35$6.33$4.34 $1.95 $1.34 Building R&M, Supplies & Other Licenses PRD $0 $0.00 $13.71 $0.00 $0.00 $22.29 $8.15 $601,244 $20.40 Payroll Taxes/Benefits PRD $0.33 $194,004 $159,587 $51,035$32,165 $0.01 $0 $7.00 $562,311 $0 $2.15 $639,455 $11.32 Payroll Taxes/Benefits $10,127 6.1%7.5% 0.2% Licenses % 18.3%22.6% 22.2%19.3%15.3% 0.0% 4.7% 0.2% 0.0% Total Property Expense % 13.6% 15.8% 13.4% 0.2% $24.37 8.5% $0 $0 $3,834 $0.13 $0.28 7.3% $0.00 $1.45 Budget 0.2% 1.6% 7.7% 5.6% 20.3% 5.4% 4.1% 5.5% 0.0% The ad valorem tax estimate was developed for this section in the Ad Valorem Tax section of this report. The State of Seniors Housing 2017 provided the following information pertaining to property/liability insurance: 134 Brookdale Castle Hills Cost of Property/Liability Insurance Community Type Lower Quartile Median Upper Quartile Independent Living $46 $268 $814 Independent/Assisted Living $30 $377 $1,147 IALF/ALZ $36 $358 $1,036 Assisted Living $31 $358 $916 Assisted/Memory Care $33 $358 $1,630 CCRCs $107 $380 $1,300 Source: State of Seniors Housing 2017 The premium is forecast to be $48,500 which equates to $500 per unit. This is more than the total median as shown in the preceding chart. This is reasonable considering the historicals and the comparables. The State of Seniors Housing 2017 provided the following information pertaining to total utilities by resident day by community type. Total Utilities by Resident Day by Community Type Community Type Lower Quartile Median Upper Quartile Independent Living $1.25 $4.76 $13.72 Independent/Assisted Living $1.45 $5.62 $14.44 IALF/ALZ $3.02 $6.14 $14.51 Assisted Living $1.97 $4.67 $12.90 Assisted/Memory Care $1.76 $5.30 $12.74 CCRCs $2.15 $5.54 $14.89 Source: State of Seniors Housing 2017 Total utilities for the subject property are forecasted based upon historicals and comparables. Our estimate is within the range of the comparables and by community type in the above chart. The forecast for building repairs and maintenance, supplies, and other is based upon historicals and comparables. Wages are based upon comparables given the historicals are not separated. 135 Brookdale Castle Hills For this and all categories, payroll taxes and benefits are forecast at 19.0% of wages. This is based upon the expense comparables, which indicated percentages of 11.0% to 24.2% with an average of 18.9%, and the subject’s percentages which range from 24.4% to 27.4%. Housekeeping and Laundry Housekeeping and laundry services are typically covered in standard room and board fees. Housekeeping expenses consist of labor, supplies, and some minor equipment repair costs. Housekeeping services are either performed in-house or via contract labor. 41,846 $4,685,210 $36,003 1.3% 1.4% $2.32 0.2% 0.6% 2.1% 0.5% 2.1% 0.5% 0.2%0.1% 0.3% 0.7% $2.62 0.3% 0.3% 1.1% $2.42 1.3% 2.4%1.9% $0.76 $1.78 0.8% 0.1% 0.7% 1.6% 2.1% $0.66 $0.65$0.78$0.55 $0.59 $2.42 2.1% $2.46 $0.66 0.5% $68,303 $16,452 $8,768 $9,256 $9,582 $65,767 $2.40 $1.06 $1.50 $1.61$0.86 $0.16 $6,829 $31,789 $74,621 $0.34 $0.27 $7,845 $1.40 $19,170 $0.51Payroll Taxes/Benefits PRD Supplies & Other PRD Payroll Taxes/Benefits % 0.3% 0.3% $12,905 $1.67 $1.54 $38,287 $72,306 $60,115 $61,076 $1.45 $1.30 1.4%1.0% $1.60 1.1%1.3% 1.4% Total Hskping & Lndry Expense % $0.35 $2.44 $8,605 Supplies & Other $11,290 $27,556 $9,926 $0.30 $61,133 $14,884 $19,772 $0.39 $1.13 $0.41 Supplies & Other % 0.3% 0.7% $98,677 Wages PRD Total Hskping & Lndry Expense PRD Wages % $4,266,590 $4,057,004 Item Total Hskping & Lndry Expense 1.8% 2.4% 43 $20,140 $77,640 Income & Expense Comparables $2,813 24,407 Payroll Taxes/Benefits $12,949 $12,481 $0.41 $4.04 $0.12 23,993 Ending Budget For Year Annual Year Year Ending 12/16 12/17 05/18 $36,610Wages $53,401 $58,640 $25,548 $43,398 $37,954 3 Months 30,532 23,638 25,11625,227 $2,759,220 Ending 12/18 $3,867,486 Average Resident Days 31,883 $3,279,841 JLL Pro Forma $32,756 1 2 $2,804,782 $2,919,697 $2.54 $38,719 $41,289 29,492 $10,596 0.6% 0.4% $2,885,616 25,278 1.6% $2,461,142 0.4% $0.38 $0.42 Ending Housekeeping and Laundry Expense Comparison Subject Total Income We will use a wage forecast of $1.40 prd for the Housekeeping and Laundry expense based upon historicals and comparables. Our projection is in line with both the historical and comparable data. Supplies and other are forecast at $0.65 prd based upon historicals and comparables. Our projection is in line with both the historical and comparable data. 136 Brookdale Castle Hills Dietary Costs Dietary costs typically consist of dietitians’ salaries, dietary supervision, dietary staff cost, raw food costs, food supplements, dietary consultants, equipment rental, dietary supplies, uniform cost, cleaning supplies, and minor repairs. $26,176 $133,096 $25,113 $185,640 $15,805 $0.18 $8.64 1.5% $7,568 $361,744 $1.65 $0.31 $6.50 $139,242 $7.44 $5.80 $0.56 $6.11 8.3% $296,350 $169,579 Annual $91,936$104,062 $3,279,841 23,638 29,492 12/17 Dietary Expense Comparison Item 31,883 23,993 30,532 Income & Expense Comparables $86,869 $24,151 3 $13,069 $272,207 $3,867,486 JLL Pro Forma $4,685,210 $68,899 Ending 25,227 $95,951 $2,759,220 $95,037 $2,885,616 25,278 25,116 $2,804,782 $2,919,697 $92,900 $132,391 $95,653 $23,176 3 Months Average For Year Ending Ending 12/16 Ending 4 Year 05/18 Budget 9.2% $273,734$266,601 $10.93 3.4% 0.5% 4.9% 4.7% 3.2% $0.85 0.8% 5.7% 3.0% $10.68 0.8% $260,751$310,213 $10.85 $5.27 0.2% $10.32 9.4% $4.02 $258,478 $4.34 10.8% $1.00 $4.69 0.4% $0.55 0.5%0.4% $0.43 3.3% $0.49 4.2% $10.99 5.2% 0.2% 7.7% 4.6% 0.5% 0.3% 5.8% $16,221 $0.48 $0.48 3.5% 0.6% 9.0% 0.5% 0.3% 0.9% 0.4% 4.9% $0.46 $5.62 $3.16 $7,874 9.0% Subject $142,187 $11,459 $3.15 $141,733 1 Supplies & Other % Payroll Taxes/Benefits PRD Supplies & Other $16.04 $11.11 $2,461,142 Payroll Taxes/Benefits Wages $149,510Food Total Dietary Expense PRD $6.93 $5.01 $4,266,590Total Income $26,025 $181,601 $52,238 Wages % 1.2% $391,413 $61,512 Wages PRD Resident Days 2 $122,275 $6,679 0.6% Food % Total Dietary Expense % 5.2% 1.5% 0.3% Supplies & Other PRD $0.21 $2.52 3.5% 4.5% Payroll Taxes/Benefits % $221,094 $1.64 $12,108$10,937 $0.98 24,407 $12,667 $4,057,004 Total Dietary Expense 9.6% $0.40 $1.07 Food PRD $21,899 Year 41,846 $3.81$3.64 $5.66 $5.75 $0.60$1.04 $10.05 2.8% 12/18 $17,651 5.2% 0.9% $5.60 2.5% $11,838 $276,124 10.0% $0.33 0.4% $0.96 $11,568 $3.80 The State of Seniors Housing 2017 reported the following raw food costs: Average Food Costs per Resident Day Region ILF IL/AL IALF/ALZ ALF AL/ALZ CCRC Northeast $6.88 $7.55 $7.97 $5.96 $7.09 $6.07 Southeast $4.90 $5.76 N/A $5.48 $6.41 $7.31 North Central $4.74 $6.56 $6.90 $5.17 $6.14 $6.71 South Central $4.99 $6.41 N/A $5.84 $6.62 $7.33 West $5.22 $6.70 $7.32 $6.62 $7.10 $8.18 Entire United States $5.18 $6.63 $7.36 $5.86 $6.70 $6.88 Source: State of Seniors Housing 2017 We will use a wage forecast of $3.15 prd for the Dietary expense based upon historicals and comparables. Our projection is below the historical and in line with the comparable data. Our forecast of the Food expense is $5.75 prd based upon historicals and comparables. Our projection is below the historical and in line with the comparable data. Supplies and other are forecast at $0.55 prd based upon historicals and comparables. Our projection is below the historical and in line with the comparable data. 137 Brookdale Castle Hills Care Expense Care expense includes wages and benefits for care attendants, which may include LPNs and RNs, in providing residents of the facility with assistance during activities of daily living. Also included are supplies used by the care staff. 22.3%28.1%18.9% 23.8% 4.9% 6.0% 22.2% 24.4% 0.2% 0.1% 23.9% Supplies & Other % 0.5% 1.0% $27.30 $3.90 $15.40 $30.91 $480,240 0.2% 12.9% 18.0% 19.5% 15.4% 18.8% $0.23 $28.21 $530,083 $100,550 $13,671 $644,305 $776,247 $14,345 $6.59 $19.98 11.3% 2.1% 0.3% 13.8% $0.60 $0.45 $28.24 $0.47 $22.14 Payroll Taxes/Benefits Total Care Services Expense $705,742 Supplies & Other $155,668 $5,658 $561,129 $142,665 Payroll Taxes/Benefits PRD $0.66 $1.67 $6.38 3 12/17 Income & Expense Comparables Average $52,883 $927,706 $547,469 $12.67 $21.48 4 41,846 $4,685,210 Ending Subject 3 Months For Year JLL Pro Forma 23,638 05/182 $543,088 Ending 12/18 $2,804,782 $2,919,697 $2,885,616 12/16 25,116 $2,461,142 $3,867,486 Year Care Expense Comparison 25,278 $2.40 $0.33 3.8% Supplies & Other PRD 5.0% $40,665 Ending 22.9% $38.01 $0.81 $5.64 $24.85 2.1% 2.8% 4.6% 3.5% 0.6% 0.6% 0.4% $732,729 $22.24 $20.50 0.4% 18.4% $29.97 Year $17.29 30,53223,993 $690,021 $114,871 25,227 $2,759,220Total Income Wages PRD 3.1% $20.02 $4,266,590 $551,131 $110,687 $573,207 $22,412 $11,049 $4,521 $4,268 $128,562 $146,860 $706,305 $666,796 $712,510 $22.82 $24.59 $0.18 $0.17 Wages Total Care Services Expense PRD 19.2% Item 24,407 Wages % Total Care Services Expense % 16.5% Resident Days $4,057,004 $731,373 $20,966 Payroll Taxes/Benefits % $4.19 Annual 31,883 1 $2.20 $3.79 $5.44 $133,645 $13,271 $24.09 Budget 29,492 $3,279,841 $605,020 $604,586 $165,569 $5.82 18.8% $22.30 $527,185 21.9% Ending We will use a wage forecast of $20.50 prd for the Care expense based upon historicals and comparables. Our projection is below the historical and in line with the comparable data. Supplies and other are forecast at $0.45 prd based upon historicals and comparables. Our projection is in line with both the historical and comparable data. 138 Brookdale Castle Hills Activities and Other Expenses Activities and other expenses depend on the residence and management’s ability to offer these services. These additional services can include social and recreational activities, crafts, and transportation. 0.4% $2.09 $1.20 1.9% $0.00 $128,450 $0.13$0.44$0.10 0.4%2.0% $0.36 0.7% 0.1% 0.2% 0.1% $0.49 1.5%3.2% 1.5% 1.5% 0.3% $43,633 $1.56 $0.94 Payroll Taxes/Benefits % 2.8% $0.95 $0.14 $1.79 0.1% 0.4% 0.4% 0.1% $3.53 0.4% $1.31 Total Activities Expense Total Activities Expense PRD $1.37 $5.26 0.3% Supplies & Other PRD $0.92 $3.37 1.1%1.1% 1.0% 1.1% $1.47 Payroll Taxes/Benefits PRD $0.09 Supplies & Other $0.17 $82,303 1.0% Wages % Wages PRD 25,27830,532 23,638 $42,325 $12,272 $3,867,486 $2,804,782 $22,625 $2,759,220 41,846 $4,685,210 $0 $0 $21,051 $21,051 $4,462 $3,224Payroll Taxes/Benefits Supplies & Other % 0.7% 31,883 $2,491 25,227 $2,919,697 $10,322 Ending $31,772 $2,885,616 $24,067 $37,131 2.7% $9,718 $44,544 Ending 12/172 3 Months 3 Average 1.3%0.9% $1.54 $1.32 $0.00 $0.50 $0.50 0.0% 0.0% $57,515 $83,556 05/18 Budget 0.7% 0.1% $1.76 Income & Expense Comparables $2,795 $11,528 $9,689 $29,309 Annual $36,118 $8,098 $4,057,004 $38,048 0.5% 0.9% 1.1% Resident Days 1 Year 4 $29,048 $35,405 $11,809 For Year Wages $2,461,142 Activities Expense Comparison 25,116 Item $1.41 $76,105 $61,712 $35,390 $4,203 $78,621 $4,266,590 24,407 Total Income $30,909 Total Activities Expense % $0.39 $0.39 $3,279,841 JLL Pro Forma Subject Ending 12/1812/16 Ending $22,119 29,492 $0.49 1.3% $3.03 $1.23 3.0% $0.75 1.5% $1.15 $3.12 $1.26 $31,011 0.9% $36,925 Year 23,993 $2.17 $0.33 We will use a wage forecast of $0.75 prd for the Activities expense based upon historicals and comparables. Our projection is in line with both the historical and comparable data. Supplies and other are forecast at $1.20 prd based upon historicals and comparables. Our projection is in line with both the historical and comparable data. 139 Brookdale Castle Hills General and Administrative Expenses General and administrative expenses vary from residence to residence but typically include administrative salaries, office salaries, legal expenses, office supplies, penalties, bad debt expense, dues, subscriptions, office equipment rental, bank charges, educational costs, telephone, and advertising and marketing costs. 0.7% Total G&A Expense PRD Supplies & Other PRD $3.07 Wages-Marketing PRD $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $2.52$2.51 0.0% $21,529 $88,476 $8,848$17,888 $9.50 $2.38 $0.00 $0.02 $12.22 $0.88 $0.00 0.1% 0.0% $3.74 $0.64 $0.97 $3.42 0.0% 0.0% $21.62 11.2% 2.1% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 3.1% $921,490 $685,908 $3,894 $11.97 2.3% 2.6% $0 6.7% 8.5%24.4% $41.95 2.9% $0.00 $0.16 $0.00 $0.31 $0.55 $0.72 $0.00$0.01 2.8% 23.4% $0.00 $0.00 $28.90 $1.96 $5.86 $11.98 5.4% 6.2% $6.29 Payroll Taxes/Benefits $0 $0 $0 $0Wages-Marketing $0 Wages-Admin Payroll Taxes/Benefits Marketing & Advertising $121,707 $0 $0 $86,107 $0 $51,629 $26,520$155,550 $38,880 $582,448 $292,174 $145,844 $141,239 $0 $0 $177,611 $606,144 $674,561 $280,174 $184,600 $53,233 $105,926 General and Administrative Expense Comparison Item 3 Months For Year 4 $800 Income & Expense Comparables $0 1.6% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.9% 0.0% 0.0% 0.3% 0.0% 0.0% 0.6% 0.0% 0.6% 0.9% 2.2% 0.3% 19.3% -0.1% 0.7% Telephone $17,464 $21,425 $4,785 $18,192 Legal & Audit $0 $7,539 $0 2.7% 38.2% 16.7% 2.6% Total G&A Expense % 21.6% 16.9% 11.7% 17.4% 33.5% 33.3% Supplies & Other % 1.5% 3.5% 3.3% 1.5% 0.7% 1.9% 5.1% 0.6%0.4% 0.0% 0.2% Bad Debt Expense % Telephone % 0.7% Payroll Taxes/Benefits % 0.0% 3.8% 0.4% 0.5% Marketing & Advertising % 2.9% Legal & Audit % 1.8% 31.6% 1.6% $39.76 $0.71 0.0% 0.0%0.0% 0.0% 20.8% $28.10 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.2% 0.0% $3.00$2.88 $18.59 Wages-Admin % 13.7% 7.2% 5.9% 0.1% 0.0% 2.2% 0.6% 2.6% 3.2% 0.6% 2.7% 0.3% Payroll Taxes/Benefits PRD $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $3.59 $3.38 $2.05 $0.73Telephone PRD Legal & Audit PRD 0.0% 9.5% 21.0% $0.73$0.57 Wages-Marketing % $0.87 $36.53 $38.05 $0.37 ($0.02) $3.44 Bad Debt Expense PRD ($0.12) Payroll Taxes/Benefits % 3.3% Total G&A Expense Wages-Admin PRD $7.03 $6.08 $699,897 $939,915 $2.51 $6.08 $24.94 $24.03 Payroll Taxes/Benefits PRD $0.67 Bad Debt Expense -$3,962 Marketing & Advertising PRD $3.82 $6.37 $1.62 Supplies & Other $62,593 $13,466 $20,643 $9,434 -$448$40,464 $104,885 $904,662 $12.57 $0.00 $2.53 $2.55 $18.27 $0 $0 $526,067 $99,789 $0 $0 $4,266,590 $4,057,004 $95,849 $0 $0 $4,685,210 $2,759,220 $3,279,841$2,885,616 Resident Days 31,883 25,22723,993 Subject 1 29,49241,846 Total Income Average3 $3,867,486 $2,804,782 30,532 23,638 $26,731 $0.16 $0.20 EndingEnding 12/172 JLL Pro Forma $17,601 $0.30 $0.73$0.72 $0.00 $548,109 $180 $0 $1.81 $0.01 $3.43 $0.00 $0.00 $3.25 $0 $105,516 $79,881 25,116 Year 12/16 Budget 12/18 Ending $0.00 $0.00 Ending Year Annual $0 $0 $79,819 $4.43 24,407 $62,187 $18,096 $18,460 $143,770 $88,431 $26.75 $26.86 05/18 25,278 $0.33 $386,633 $589,545 $1,053,747 $16,060 $287,529 $22.65 $17,321 $72,219 $7.35 $77,489 $4,169 $324 $1.05 $158,642 $2,461,142 $676,116 $2,919,697 $63,632$143,138 $81,961 $98,144 $921,434 $961,891 We will use a wage forecast of $9.50 prd for the General and Administrative expense, which includes marketing wages, based upon comparables. Our projection is below the historical and in line with the comparable data. Note that historically this expense has been high since it also includes other departmental wages. The marketing and advertising expense, which excluded marketing wages, is forecast at $3.50 prd based upon historicals and comparables. Our projection is below the historical and in line with the comparable data. Telephone expenses are forecast at $0.73 prd based upon historicals and comparables. Our projection is in line with both the historical and comparable data. Historically, the subject's bad debt expense has ranged from $0.37 to $0.87 prd. Therefore, we will conclude a bad debt expense of $0.30 prd to be reasonable. Lastly, supplies and other are forecast at $3.00 prd based upon historicals and comparables. Our projection is in line with both the 140 Brookdale Castle Hills historical and comparable data. The total general and administrative expense is well supported by the historical and the comparable data on the basis of expense per resident day. Management Fees Management Fees are paid to management companies that are responsible for the operations of the senior living business enterprise. Management company responsibilities vary from facility to facility; however, some of the typical responsibilities of management companies are financial performance, occupancy, profitability of the business, compliance with government regulations, business activities such as billing and collection of receivables, marketing, documentation, and assistance in budgeting. The management is also responsible for the maintenance and repairing of the subject property and grounds, supervision of day-to-day operations, and providing monthly or quarterly reports on occupancy, cash flow, operating expenses, and capital accounts. Year Annual 12/17 05/182 4 Total Management Expense $213,329 $193,374 Total Management Expense PRD $6.69 $8.31 $5.13 5.0% 5.0% $6.43 $5.56 5.0% Ending Ending $144,281 Ending 12/1812/16 $234,260 $5.60 5.0% $5.79 1 $202,850 $123,057 Total Management Expense % 5.0% $145,985 5.0% 41,846 $4,685,210 $5.93 $5.49 25,227 $2,885,616 $137,961 $163,992 5.0% 5.0% $140,239 Budget For Year $2,759,220 $3,279,841$3,867,486 $2,804,782 30,532 23,638 Year Resident Days 31,883 24,407 29,49225,278 Average Subject 3 Months 5.0% Total Income $4,266,590 $4,057,004 $2,461,142 3 $5.71 Management Expense Comparison Item JLL Pro Forma 23,993 5.0% $2,919,697 Ending 25,116 Income & Expense Comparables The State of Seniors Housing 2017 provided the following information pertaining to management fees: Management Fees (Percentage of Total Revenue) Community Type Minimum Average Maximum Independent Living 2.7% 5.1% 6.4% Independent/Assisted Living 1.4% 4.8% 7.8% IALF/ALZ 2.8% 5.2% 8.2% Assisted Living 2.0% 5.1% 7.4% Assisted/Memory Care 2.0% 4.9% 9.1% CCRCs 1.6% 4.1% 9.0% All Communities 1.4% 4.8% 9.1% Source: State of Seniors Housing 2017 The subject is managed by the owner, Brookdale, and will be managed by Greenbrier Senior Living upon the sale. Typically, management fees charged by unaffiliated third party companies are in the range of 4% to 7% of EGI for seniors housing projects. Although the comparables actually reported a 141 Brookdale Castle Hills variety of management expenses, we have shown an expense of 5.0% so that the comparables can be compared to the subject on a consistent basis in the analysis of total expenses. Replacement Reserve The Realty Rates Investor Survey from the 1st quarter 2018 indicated the following reserve requirements: Reserve Requirements for Health Care/Senior Housing Per Unit Minimum $255 Maximum $695 Typical $388 Source: 1st Quarter 2018 Realty Rates Investor Survey Based on the foregoing, a reserve of $300 per unit has been utilized. The pro forma for the sales used to develop the capitalization rates were developed in the same fashion for consistency. Ending 30,532 1.0% 25,227 Subject JLL Pro Forma 0.7% 1.0% $1.16$1.15 12/16 12/17 $0.98 $0.74 $34,800 $0.83 0.7% 4 41,846 $2,919,697 23,993 $24,000 Total Reserves Expense % $26,250 $29,100 $29,100 $4,685,210 Resident Days 31,883 24,407 23,638 Annual Budget $2,759,220 2 Total Reserves Expense PRD $0.89 For Year 12/18 1.0% 1.1% 29,492 $2,885,616 $3,279,841 $29,100$29,100 Reserves Expense Comparison Item $3,867,486 $2,804,782 Average Ending Ending Year 3 Months $0.99 0.9% 25,116 0.7% 0.6% 0.7% Ending 31 $4,266,590 $4,057,004 $2,461,142 25,278 05/18 Year $1.15$0.86 Total Income $17,700 $29,100Total Reserves Expense $28,500 Income & Expense Comparables $1.23 Although the expense comparables actually reported no reserve expense, we have shown an expense of $300 per unit so that the comparables can be compared to the subject on a consistent basis in the analysis of total expenses. 142 Brookdale Castle Hills Total Payroll, Bonuses, Taxes, and Benefits Total payroll, bonuses, taxes, and benefits are detailed in the chart that follows: 31.5% 66.9% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% TTL Salary, Bonus, Tax, Benefit % Marketing % General & Administrative % 37.7% 38.6% 38.8% $630,634 0.0% 0.0% 7.0%17.0% 8.7% 11.5% $0 $625,856 $0 $1,477,325 $2.29 $1.02 $1.96 $15.07 $0.00 $14.96 $0.00 $35.30 2.0% 0.9% 1.7% 13.4% 0.0% $47,210 $41,361 Activities % Care Services % Dietary % Housekeeping % Property % $64.11 13.5% 0.0% $0.00 1.8% 1.2% 1.4% 5.0% 3.0% 23.0% 18.6% 1.1% 0.9% $2.23 1.6% 1.3% 1.4% 1.5% 1.6% Marketing $0 $0 1.6% 0.5% 26.1% 0.0% 1.6% 31.1% Dietary PRD $4.85 General & Administrative PRD 1.5% 3.7% 16.0% 21.9% 0.3% 1.1% Care Services PRD $21.48 $36.34 $47.41 $67.99 $66.87 $0.00 $31.02 $30.32 $50.44 4.4% $4.80 $4.59 0.0% $0.61 $39.80 $0 $684,777 General & Administrative Marketing PRD TTL Salary, Bonus, Tax, Benefit PRD $14.52 $0.00 $1.15Activities PRD $1.89$0.45 $14.83 $24.12 $27.74 Total Salaries, Bonus, Tax, Benefits $1,608,304 $1,564,677 $955,011 $1.82Housekeeping PRD $1.70 $2.36 $1.58 $2.08 $2.91 $1.11 $0.00 $2.04 $23.59 $692,082 $0 $655,747 Dietary $64,906 $148,301 $122,619 $50,888$0 $104,448 $118,213 $121,064 $116,087 $121,829 $110,551 $96,035 $42,832 $81,969 Property $54,260 $57,707 $37,901 Housekeeping $66,350 $71,121 $30,104 $52,602 $49,315 $49,134 25,227 Annual 12/17 $3,867,486 $2,919,697 $2,885,616 Ending Budget Ending 4 Year Total Income JLL Pro Forma1 2 $4,266,590 $4,057,004 $2,461,142 Item 12/18 25,116 29,492 $3,279,841 Ending For Year Subject 12/16 23,638 $2.00 $1.83 $46,192 $2,804,782 41,846 $4,685,210 Activities $14,323 4.1% 4.0% $723,688 $354,361 $171,851 $468,939 $733,315 $0.00 21.9% 0.8% 10.2% 0.0% 39.3% $46,146 $26,659 $29,043 $52,647 $46,849 $1.25 Property PRD $1,686,879$1,607,132 $0.00 $0$61,476 $0 Care Services $0.00 $11.31 Income & Expense Comparables Resident Days 31,883 24,407 $0.89 $1,401,329 $1.99 $0 $0 $22.70 $7.16 27.9% 26.2% 29.6% 0.0% 36.6% 1.7% 4.2% 23.4% 24.2% 23.8% 1.9% 57.3% 57.8% 59.3% $33.77 $73.50 $0.00 $67.74 $0.00 $27.13 $30.68 $34.21 $1,289,759 $1.73$0.00 $0.00 $1,712,424 $1,845,988 $0 $3.75 $1.64 1.6% 1.5% 3.4% $1.86 $0.00 $43.73 $24.40 0.0% 1.6% 1.4% 0.0% $1.80 $28.07 $0 $770,589 $719,457 $764,786 $853,727 Ending $859,161 $333,407 $15,496 $45,094 $26,322 $887,040 $565,877 $707,989 $685,753 $5.11 $3.80 $1.96 $1.67 $0 1.8% $6.08 $5.00 Payroll Salaries, Bonuses, Taxes and Benefits Expense Comparison $2,759,220 Year 3 30,532 Average 23,993 25,278 3 Months 05/18 The total payroll, bonuses, taxes, and benefits expense is within the range of the expense comparables on the basis of expense per resident day. 143 Brookdale Castle Hills Total Expenses Total expenses are detailed in the chart that follows: 13.8% 0.4% 4 41,846 0.7% 15.3% 66.8% 33.2% $1,553,633 $20.46 $1.78 $8.64 $15.40 $0.50 $21.62 $5.60 $0.83 $74.84 $37.13 18.3% 1.6% 7.7% $4,685,210 $856,132 109.7% 76.3% $84.83 $26.38 9.0% 1.9% 22.3% 9.0% 2.1% 22.2% 18.3% $36.53 $38.05 $3.03 $2.09 $27.30 95.4% 96.3% 1.0% 1.0% 5.0% 5.0% 16.7% 5.0% $5.35 -$10.67 $120.52 $18.59 -9.7% 23.7%4.6% 3.7% 68.9% 100.3% 1.1% 0.9% 5.0% $5.93 5.0% 0.6% 19.3% 5.0% 23.8% 24.4% 23.9% 2.8% 28.1% 1.5% 1.9% 22.6% Net Operating Income % 34.6% Total Expense % Reserves % 65.4% 33.1%23.6% 16.5% 22.2% 1.0% 3.2% 66.9% 0.7% 11.7% 31.1% -0.3% Care Services % Activities % 0.7% 1.0% 5.0% 76.4% 0.7% General & Administrative % 21.6% 16.9% 5.0% 5.0%Management % 5.0% 5.2% Property % 15.8% Housekeeping & Laundry % 1.8% $0.74 Net Operating Income PRD 13.6% Total Expense PRD 9.6% 2.4% Dietary % $46.25 $39.27 $33.95 13.4% 1.5% 10.8% 1.6% 22.9% Total Expense $2,791,919 $4.04 $22.82 $1,646,468 $2,667,106 $1,200,381$814,673 $2.46 $2.54 ($7,384) Dietary PRD $24.59 $28.21$38.01 $10.85 $68.62 $0.89 $87.57 $126.95 General & Administrative PRD $28.90 $28.10 $11.98 2.1% 2.1% 2.1% 19.3% 20.3% 2.4% 38.2%31.6% 33.3% 9.2% 33.5% 3.0% 10.0% $6.69 $8.31 $5.13 $110.39 8.3% 17.4% 1.5% 18.9% $89.49 $118.97 2.7% 9.4% $39.15 -$0.31 $109.90 $4.25 $5.49 $5.56 $1.16 $0.99 $5.79 $5.71 $1.15 $41.95$22.65 $39.76 $1.15$0.86 $1.23 $6.43 Reserves PRD $0.98 Management PRD $10.99 $10.05 $1.76Activities PRD $1.37 $5.26 $1.54 $20.40 $30.91 $2.17 $3.53 $3.12 $10.68 Care Services PRD $22.14 $777,971$958,546 $6.93 $16.04 $11.11 Net Operating Income Reserves $28,500 $24,000 $24.85 $10.32 $2.42 $2.42 $19.64Property PRD $18.21 $26.20 $13.71 $1.60 $10.93 $28.24 $2.62 $2.32Housekeeping & Laundry PRD $2.44 $24.37$26.82 $134,927 $107,427 $22.29 $23.20 ($267,898)$1,474,670 $3,098,458 $17,700 $163,992$137,961 $29,100 $29,100 $29,100$29,100$26,250 $145,985 $144,281 $2,784,770 $2,778,189$2,812,166 $2,501,870$3,027,118 $29,100$34,800 $3,131,576 $234,260 $61,712 $548,109 $76,105 $1,053,747 $57,515 $83,556 $921,434 $961,891 $78,621 $44,544 $699,897 $939,915General & Administrative $921,490 $547,469 $706,305 Management $213,329 $202,850 $123,057 $193,374 $140,239 Activities $43,633 $128,450 $36,925 $685,908 $287,529 $644,305 $21,051 $904,662 $61,133 $296,350 Care Services $705,742 $927,706 Housekeeping & Laundry $77,640 $98,677 Dietary $221,094 $732,729 $276,124 $776,247$712,510 $690,021 $65,767 $68,303 $273,734 $260,751 $61,076 $361,744 $74,621 23,993 1 2 3 Resident Days 31,883 24,407 $391,413 $666,796 $266,601 $38,287 $258,478$310,213 $72,306 $60,115 $4,266,590 $4,057,004 $2,461,142 $3,867,486Total Income Item 30,532 Average Property $580,491 $639,455 $328,899 Annual Ending Year 12/17 Year JLL Pro Forma Subject $2,885,616$2,919,697 $562,311 $2,804,782 $601,244 Ending 12/1805/18 3 Months 12/16 Ending Ending Total Expense Comparison For Year Budget $612,067 $601,574 $2,759,220 $3,279,841 29,49225,116 $633,967 Income & Expense Comparables $586,468 25,227 25,27823,638 Our total projected expenses are 76.3% of the effective gross income, within the range of the comparables. 144 Brookdale Castle Hills Income and Expense Pro Forma The following table summarizes: ■ The most recent historical period for the subject ■ The budget for the subject ■ Our pro forma conclusions for the current year ■ Our pro forma upon stabilization ■ Our pro forma conclusions for the Investment Value Assuming Not For Profit Ownership and Ad Valorem Tax Exemption Prospective Values For the prospective values, we must consider potential changes in income and expenses between the present date and the date the prospective value is effective. We will now forecast changes in income and expenses over the holding period. According to the State of Seniors Housing 2017, seniors housing revenue increased as follows for 2016 (comparison between 2015 and 2016): Annual Changes In "In House" Total Revenues Community Type Average Independent Living 4.88% Independent/Assisted Living 3.53% IALF/ALZ 6.82% Assisted Living 4.51% Assisted/Memory Care 3.21% CCRC 2.56% Source: State of Seniors Housing 2017 JLL Seniors Housing Investor Survey Inflation Trends (Winter 2018) Survey respondents were asked to indicate anticipated change in revenue and expenses for the next 12 months by sector. Despite the new supply coming online, respondents remain confident in improving fundamentals. A majority of respondents anticipate that rents will rise over the next 12 months. On average, survey respondents anticipate independent living, assisted living and memory care to have the greatest growth in revenue in the coming year, matched almost equally with average anticipated expense growth. In contrast, survey respondents expect skilled nursing facilities to have the lowest anticipated revenue growth, with expenses expected to grow at nearly twice the rate on average. 145 Brookdale Castle Hills JLL Seniors Housing Investor Survey Inflation Trends (Winter 2018) Revenue Expenses Revenue Expenses Revenue Expenses Revenue Expenses Revenue Expenses Low 3.0% 3.0% 2.5% 2.5% 0.0% 2.5% -10.0% 2.5% 0.0% 2.0% High 3.0% 3.5% 8.0% 6.0% 8.0% 6.0% 8.0% 6.0% 3.5% 4.0% Avg 3.0% 3.2% 3.7% 3.4% 3.5% 3.6% 3.0% 3.6% 1.4% 2.8% Seniors-only Apartments Independent Living Assisted Living Memory Care Skilled Nursing The subject’s prospective values have been adjusted to include 2.5% annual increase in income and 2.5% annual increase in expenses compared to our first year pro forma which is trended forward from the effective date to the date upon stabilization. 146 Brookdale Castle Hills $8,605 $19,772 $61,133 $91,936 $24,151 $133,096 $11,568 $260,751 $590,300 $19,024 $0 $47,500 $51,696 $16,828 $725,348 3 Months Ending 05/31/18 $2,459,592 $0 ($299,324) $2,160,268 Dietary Total Hskping & Lndry Exp $65,767 $95,653 $142,187 $5,658 Payroll Taxes/Benefits Supplies & Other Wages $114,871 $13,271 $732,729 $142,665 $4,268 $690,021 $61,212 $156,784 $49,111$48,500 $29,163 $0 $41,289 $46,473 $0 $361,277 $3,834 $0 $103,222 Assuming Not Stabilization Ad Valorem Exemp. Forma As OfJLL Pro Forma 12/29/1806/29/18 ($132,005) ($660,024) $3,341,701 ($668,340) $645,000 $645,000 $653,127 $2,539,693$2,508,091 $3,300,120 ($660,024) ($133,668) $3,300,120 $2,508,091 ($132,005) $296,350 $17,651 $16,221 $296,350 $165,569 $169,579 $12,108 $26,176 $276,124 $605,020 $776,247 $17,651 $16,221 $92,900 $17,873 $68,303 $154,833 $243,325 $17,720 $781,474 $48,500 $17,500 $771,750 $0 $20,252 Expenses Insurance (Prop.& Liability) Ground/Facility Rent $42,763 $159,556 $43,302$42,763 $612,067 $601,574 $7,845 $609,154 $46,440 $160,488 $154,704 $154,833 Payroll Taxes/Benefits $16,452 $38,719 Supplies & Other Housekeeping $10,596 $0 Building R&M, Supplies & Other Payroll Taxes/Benefits Wages Wages Total Property Expense $0 $0 $0 $586,468 $32,756 Summary of Income and Expense Forecasts JLL ProFor Profit andCurrent Investment Value Upon Annual Less Conc./Loss to Leases $2,478,584 $2,179,702 Income For Year $168,037 Ending Second Persons Entrance/Community Fees Parking Net Rental Income Licenses $0 $0 Other Income Property Total Sundry Income Utilities $3,379 RETaxes/Special Assess Budget $11,544 $579,518 $485,239 $10,104 12/31/18 $50,834 $21,797 $0 ($298,882) Rental Income Rental Income Commercial Additional Meals/Care Sundry Income Less Vacancy & Coll Loss $20,000 $0 $60,450 $28,800 $20,000 $0 $60,450 $28,800 $17,500 $771,750 $222,260 $3,882 $0 $3,834 $0 $2,576 $240,297$234,622 $8,125 $103,222 $19,411 $7,944 $41,809 $300,084 $171,716 $19,170 $8,227 $104,523 $41,289 $7,845 $68,303 $19,170 $8,125 $69,164 $116,319 $732,729 $13,271 $604,586 $114,871 $13,439 $741,961 $94,070 $169,579 $92,900 Total Dietary Expense $604,586 $16,425 $612,204$543,088 Wages Total Care Services Exp Supplies & Other Food Payroll Taxes/Benefits Care 147 Brookdale Castle Hills $177,611 $0 $0 $3,224 $29,100 $2,885,616 $2,778,189 $107,427 $0 $0 $8,848 $0 $88,476 $4,203 $35,390 $22,119 $280,174 $0 TOTAL EXPENSES Wages-Admin Total Reserves Expense Reserves Expense Payroll Taxes/Benefits TOTAL INCOME JLL $548,109 $35,390 $29,100 $2,759,220 $3,027,118 Annual 3 Months Ending Forma As Of JLL ProFor Profit andFor Year $2,533,393 $163,992 $29,100 Current $3,279,841 $777,971 $787,774$1,018,268 $53,904 $0 $0 $97,057 $29,467 $3,321,167 $29,100 $61,712 Pro Forma 06/29/18 12/29/18 Ad Valorem Exemp. $4,203 Stabilization UponInvestment Value Assuming Not Summary of Income and Expense Forecasts (Continued) Telephone Total Management Exp Management Expense Total G&A Expense Supplies & Other Bad Debt Expense $137,961 $1,053,747 $86,107 $180 $18,192 $31,011 $17,888 $72,219 Total Activities Expense Supplies & Other Budget General & Administrative 05/31/18 $12,272 $184,600 $0 Payroll Taxes/Benefits Wages-Marketing Marketing & Advertising Legal & Audit NET OPERATING INCOME $9,689 ($267,898) Activities $76,105 $0 $35,405 12/31/18 Wages Payroll Taxes/Benefits Ending $26,520 $0 $18,460 ($448) $63,632 $961,891 $144,281 $29,048 $44,544 $676,116 $2,261,573$2,501,870 $8,848 $674,561 $3,279,841 $95,849 $0 $88,476 $0 $555,015 $89,591 $21,800 $8,959 $163,992 $62,490 $166,058 $283,704 $21,529 $95,849 $0 $22,398 $4,256 $22,119 $53,233 $21,529 $548,109 $35,836 $61,712 $280,174 $53,233 Capitalization Rate We will rely upon several methods to estimate an appropriate capitalization rate. JLL Seniors Housing Investor Survey Capitalization Rate Trends (Winter 2018) Survey respondents were asked for the appropriate capitalization rate for assets based upon sector and class, and utilizing first-year pro forma net operating income. Respondents agreed and capitalization rates in 2018 are expected to continue on a steady trajectory. Respondents observed minimum Class A+ cap rates for the seniors-only and independent living categories of 5.0%, while survey respondents noted cap rates for the service-intensive skilled nursing sector at 11.1% on average. The influx of new inventory is also creating more pricing disparity between Class A- and B+ or Class B and C assets. Results are shown as follows: 148 Brookdale Castle Hills JLL Seniors Housing Investor Survey Capitalization Rate Trends (Winter 2018) A+ A B C A+ A B C A+ A B C A+ A B C Min 5.0% 5.0% 6.0% 7.0% 5.0% 5.3% 6.0% 6.5% 5.5% 5.8% 6.5% 7.0% 6.0% 6.5% 7.3% 7.8% Max 6.0% 6.5% 7.5% 8.5% 7.0% 7.3% 8.0% 10.0% 8.0% 9.0% 10.0% 11.0% 10.0% 11.0% 12.0% 13.0% Avg 5.5% 5.8% 6.5% 7.6% 5.9% 6.3% 7.0% 7.9% 6.5% 6.9% 7.6% 8.7% 7.3% 7.7% 8.4% 9.3% A+ A B C A+ A B C A+ A B C A+ A B C A+ A B C Min 5.0% 5.5% 6.3% 6.8% 5.3% 5.5% 6.3% 6.8% 5.0% 5.3% 6.0% 6.5% 10.0% 10.5% 12.0% 12.0% 8.5% 9.0% 9.5% 10.0% Max 7.0% 8.0% 9.0% 10.5% 8.0% 8.0% 9.0% 12.0% 9.0% 9.5% 10.0% 12.0% 12.0% 12.5% 13.0% 15.0% 8.5% 9.0% 9.5% 10.0% Avg 6.0% 6.5% 7.2% 8.1% 6.6% 7.0% 7.6% 8.8% 7.5% 7.9% 8.8% 10.4% 11.1% 11.6% 12.4% 13.5% 8.5% 9.0% 9.5% 10.0% Freestanding Independent Living Freestanding Assisted LivingSeniors-only Apartments Memory Care Net Leased NursingIndependent and Assisted Living Rental CCRC Entry-fee CCRC Nursing Extraction from Comparable Sales Sales of seniors housing facilities included in the sales comparison approach revealed the following overall rates. June-17 6 Going concern $27,210,000 Carriage Inn/Village on the Park Portfolio Cash Going concern Property Rights Conveyed Going concern Sale Data Date of Sale Financing Terms Arm's length Sales Price Arm's length Cash Conditions of Sale $26,000,000 Arm's length Cash Cash Katy, TX Conroe, TXFlower Mound, TX Going concern Going concern March-16 $7,650,000 Summary of Sales Comparables Element of Comparison Comparable Number 1 $19,100,000 $25,270,000 4 Colonial Oaks Sugar Land 5 Orchard Park at Katy Kenne, TX 2 May-17 December-16 April-16 Tulsa, OK May-16 Location Data Property Name City, State 3 Sugarl Land, TX Chisholm Trail Estates The Oaks at Flower Mound Effective Gross Income Care Levels Number of Units Year Built 82 70.3% – 1998 - $16,844 $21,469 $1,760,436 -($3,028,647) Occupancy at Sale Expense Ratio NOI After Reserves NOI Per Unit After Reserves $1,473,241 ALF/MC ALF/MC 98.0% 95.0% 64,742 $251,316 4.43 – 858,229 $244.69 79,752 $316,395 $341.18 $202,507$86,932 73,111 73,000 $317,073 $355.62 Sales Price Per Square Foot $297,294 $5,042,738 Physical Data Overall Cap. Rate 2014 $17,332 $4,308,800 $1,280,153 Expenses EGIM Sales Price Per Unit 5.16 Units of Comparison 76 85 Arm's length $7,415 $2,413,249 $104.79 ($3,282,302) ($1,760,704) IALF 99.0% 99.0% $652,545 65.1% 2015 73.0% 1998 88 ALF/MC 3.17 $404.00 $390.32 47,277 6.70% 6.77% Building Area 5.83% $210,000,000 ($23,883,684) $14,091,000 IALF/MC Arm's length $37,974,684 $1,830,110 Cash Going concern ($3,330,311) Arm's length $13,588 Cash $21,280 2014 $5,160,421 62.9% ALF/MC 86 91.1% Income Data 5.53 8.53% 6.73% 94.0% 1989 1,037 64.5% 6.71% 5.27 Legend at Tulsa Hills The range in capitalization rates is from a low of 5.83% to a high of 8.53% with an average of 6.88%. 149 Brookdale Castle Hills NIC Survey The NIC and Real Capital Analytics compile statistics for seniors housing sale transactions on a quarterly basis. The most recent data is shown below: NIC'S Capitalization Rate Survey 1Q182Q17 6.50% 9.80%Nursing Center 10.40% 4Q17 6.70% 10.70%10.70% 3Q17 Seniors Housing 7.00% Property Type 7.00% It should be noted that the seniors housing averages combine independent living and assisted living properties. The following graph shows capitalization trends in the seniors housing and skilled nursing sectors. 5.00% 7.00% 9.00% 11.00% 13.00% 15.00% Cap Rate Comparison Skilled Nursing Seniors Housing The data above is not collected in a scientific manner. Every quarter participants submit capitalization rates by segment type without clearly labeling the property name and location. Thus, the cap rate may be skewed by the repetitive submission of well-known sales within the industry. The chart is reliable for determining cap rate movement within the seniors housing industry over an extended period of time. 150 Brookdale Castle Hills Band of Investment We will also develop a band of investment analysis. Based upon conversations with lenders, the subject would likely qualify for financing based upon the following terms: ■ Interest rate 4.50% ■ 10 year term with a 30 year amortization ■ 75% loan to value Based upon these terms, the resulting mortgage constant is 6.08%. For the equity component, we will use an equity capitalization rate of 10.00%. The resulting rate via band of investment is as follows. 4.56%75.0% Weighted Rate 30 4.50% Component Mortgage Interest Rate Band of Investment Number of Years Applicable Rate 10.00% 25.0% Weight 2.50% Basic Rate Equity 7.06% 6.08% Capitalization Rate Conclusion The following summarizes the capitalization rate data considered: 6.88% 8.53% 7.06%Band of Investment Analysis NIC Survey - Seniors Housing 1Q-2018 NIC Survey - Nursing 1Q-2018 10.70% Average High Derived From Comparables 5.83% Item 7.00% JLL Investor Survey - Winter 2018 - Class B - AL Facility 6.00% 7.60% 10.00% Capitalization Rate Indicators Low To determine an appropriate capitalization rate for the subject, the following characteristics are considered: Qualitative Factors Considered In Capitalization Rate Selection Upwards Influence X X X NeutralDownward InfluenceItem X X Strength of Seniors Housing Market Quality of Construction Subject's Regional Location Subject's Location within Market Age of Improvements 151 Brookdale Castle Hills The subject is of good quality in a market with favorable demographics. The market has below average population growth combined with below average income levels and housing values. Also, the market is undersupplied. In addition, Comparable Sales 4, 5 and 6 are the most similar to the subject in terms of age, quality, and location; therefore, the most weight is placed upon these sales. Considering these factors, the subject’s capitalization should fall above the average displayed by the NIC survey and above the average of the comparable sales. We conclude a capitalization rate of 7.25% to be appropriate for the subject. 3 Months Ending 05/31/18 $107,427 Total Income - - $3,027,118 For Year - $2,501,870 Investment Value Forma As Of Summary of Direct Capitalization Upon JLL Pro Assuming NotBudget $2,885,616 $2,778,189 Annual Ad Valorem Exemp. For Profit and Stabilization Capitalization Rate Net Operating Income Total Expenses Ending - Indicated Stabilized Value Stabilized Value Rounded 12/29/1806/29/18 7.25% $2,759,220 12/31/18 $2,533,393 $3,321,167 $2,261,573 $3,279,841 Pro Forma $3,279,841 Current Year JLL 7.25% 7.25% ($267,898) $787,774 - ($1,070,000) $10,730,000 - - - $777,971 $1,018,268 $11,950,000 $0- $13,680,000 ($1,410,000) $10,700,000 $0 $0 $1,080,000 $1,080,000 - Less Unstabilized Discount Less Absorption/Rent Loss - Less Repairs Indicated Value - - - $0 - -Add Excess Land $1,080,000 $14,045,080$10,730,638 $0 ($40,000) $14,050,000 ($40,000) $10,865,843 $10,870,000 Indicated Value via the Income Approach - Direct Capitalization The indicated value on a stabilized basis is $10,730,000 for the subject. However, the subject is not operating at its stabilized level. Therefore, adjustments were applied to get to the as is value. The rent loss adjustment is for rent loss for the period needed to achieve the forecast stabilized occupancy level. This is calculated later in the report. We have also applied an unstabilized discount to the indicated stabilized value. This is in recognition of the fact that buyers and lenders view the purchase and/or financing of unstabilized assets as riskier than the purchase and/or financing of stabilized assets. Thus, equity and mortgage rates are higher. The following are comparables in which unstabilized discounts are extracted for comparison purposes. 152 Brookdale Castle Hills ■ Comparable 1 -This comparable consisted of a transaction that was still in lease up in which there was an as-is purchase price of $16,750,000 with a stabilized purchase price of $18,900,000. The additional $2,150,000 would be paid upon reaching stabilization. At the time of sale, the occupancy was 57% and had experienced an average net absorption of 5.42 beds/units per month. The remaining absorption/rent loss during the absorption period was forecasted to be $780,000. Therefore, the implied unstabilized discount was 7.6%. ■ Comparable 2 - This comparable was a transaction in which an experienced senior housing buyer planned to implement improvement. The as-is purchase price was $49,500,000 with an untrended stabilized value of $58,500,000. This asset had an occupancy of 100% at the time of sale with below market rents in place. The buyer planned to implement market rates and invest $750,000 in upgrades. The income loss/temporary loss to lease from the below market rents was estimated at $1,230,000. After deducting the temporary loss to lease and renovation costs from the as if stabilized value resulted in $56,520,000. This resulted in an extracted unstabilized discount of 12.4% based on the as-is purchase price of $49,500,000. ■ Comparable 3 – This was a transaction in which an experienced senior housing developer sold two recently completed facilities to an experienced owner of senior housing facilities for $50,600,000. The seller remained as the operator through a third party management agreement. At the time of contract, one asset was complete but not opened with 15 residents or 12.6% preleased. The second facility was opened two months prior to the contract and had an occupancy of 15% at the time of contract. There were two separate potential earn outs for the seller related to excess cash above the debt service with a payment of $3,400,000. The second was payable if the NOI exceeded a set threshold, but not to exceed $11,600,000. Based upon the individual valuation and analysis, the threshold would be exceeded and the maximum stabilized payment of $11,600,000 was probable. The implied unstabilized discount was $15,000,000, or approximately 20.5% based upon the as if stabilized values. The indicated market value of the going concern on an as-is basis is $10,700,000 for the subject. In addition, a prospective market value of the going concern upon stabilization was indicated using forecast net operating income at the date of stabilization. The indicated value is $11,950,000 for the subject. No rent loss or repairs are deducted from this value. In addition, per the client’s request, we have provided the Investment Value Assuming Not-For- Profit Ownership and Tax Exempt status. The indicated value is $13,680,000 for the subject. No rent loss or repairs are deducted from this value. 153 Brookdale Castle Hills Sales Comparison Approach The sales comparison approach is based primarily upon the principle of substitution, which implies that a prudent individual will pay no more for a property than it would cost the individual to purchase a comparable substitute property. The steps involved in developing the sales comparison approach are: ■ Research the market to obtain information pertaining to sales, listings, and sometimes offerings of property similar to the property being appraised. ■ Investigate the market data to determine if the data is factually accurate and to determine if each sale represents an arm's length transaction. ■ Determine relevant units of comparison, i.e. sales price per square foot, and develop a comparative analysis for each. ■ Compare the subject and comparable sales according to the elements of comparison and then adjust each sale as appropriate. ■ Reconcile the multiple value indications that result from the adjustment of the comparables into a single value indication. Units of comparison are components into which a property may be divided for purposes of comparison. All appropriate units of comparison should be analyzed for the property type being appraised and the resulting value indications reconciled to a single indicated value or value range. The sales are analyzed and adjusted for differences in elements of comparison, which are characteristics of properties that cause the prices paid for real estate to vary. The following elements of comparison are considered: ■ Real property rights conveyed ■ Financing terms ■ Conditions of sale ■ Market conditions ■ Location ■ Physical characteristics ■ Economic characteristics ■ Use ■ Non-realty components of value Sales requiring lesser degrees of adjustment are typically the most comparable and are given greater weight than sales requiring greater degrees of adjustment. However, other factors must be considered including the reliability of the sales data and the degree of support of the required adjustments. After consideration of these factors, a final point value or value range is set forth. 154 Brookdale Castle Hills Applicability to Subject A number of factors make the application of the sales comparison approach problematic in the appraisal of a seniors housing facility. These factors include: ■ The relative scarcity of arm’s length sales; ■ The many variances in physical attributes from property to property; and ■ The complex economics of retirement housing facilities. These challenges are so great that, according to Elderly Housing, A Guide to Appraisal, Market Analysis, Development and Financing, “value estimates using the sales comparison approach are sometimes given little or no weight in the final reconciliation of value”. While the limitations are great, we have procured an adequate amount of sale data to develop the sales comparison approach in this appraisal. Presentation of Comparables We will now analyze consummated sales of seniors housing properties. The market for seniors housing facilities is national in scope. Most active buyers will consider a property anywhere in the country and apply similar investment criteria to properties regardless of location. Therefore, it is reflective of market behavior to use comparables from a broad geographic area. Year of construction, care mix, and date of the sale are considered much more relevant than location. The comparable sale profiles are included in the addenda of this report. The sales we have elected to use in this analysis are as follows: 155 Brookdale Castle Hills Brookdale Castle Hills: 1207 Jackson Keller Road, San Antonio, Texas 78213 Colonial Oaks Sugar Land: 13825 Lexington Boulevard, Sugar Land, TX Orchard Park at Katy: 24802 Kingsland Boulevard, Katy, TX The Oaks at Flower Mound: 3281 Long Prairie Road, Flower Mound, TX Chisholm Trail Estates: 513 Old Betsy Road, Keene, TX Carriage Inn/Village on the Park Portfolio: 750 Longmire Road, Conroe, TX Legend at Tulsa Hills: 701 West 71st Street, Tulsa, OK Comparable Sale Location Map 156 Brookdale Castle Hills June-17 6 Going concern $27,210,000 Carriage Inn/Village on the Park Portfolio Cash Going concern Property Rights Conveyed Going concern Sale Data Date of Sale Financing Terms Arm's length Sales Price Arm's length Cash Conditions of Sale $26,000,000 Arm's length Cash Cash Katy, TX Conroe, TXFlower Mound, TX Going concern Going concern March-16 $7,650,000 Summary of Sales Comparables Element of Comparison Comparable Number 1 $19,100,000 $25,270,000 4 Colonial Oaks Sugar Land 5 Orchard Park at Katy Kenne, TX 2 May-17 December-16 April-16 Tulsa, OK May-16 Location Data Property Name City, State 3 Sugarl Land, TX Chisholm Trail Estates The Oaks at Flower Mound Effective Gross Income Care Levels Number of Units Year Built 82 70.3% – 1998 - $16,844 $21,469 $1,760,436 -($3,028,647) Occupancy at Sale Expense Ratio NOI After Reserves NOI Per Unit After Reserves $1,473,241 ALF/MC ALF/MC 98.0% 95.0% 64,742 $251,316 4.43 – 858,229 $244.69 79,752 $316,395 $341.18 $202,507$86,932 73,111 73,000 $317,073 $355.62 Sales Price Per Square Foot $297,294 $5,042,738 Physical Data Overall Cap. Rate 2014 $17,332 $4,308,800 $1,280,153 Expenses EGIM Sales Price Per Unit 5.16 Units of Comparison 76 85 Arm's length $7,415 $2,413,249 $104.79 ($3,282,302) ($1,760,704) IALF 99.0% 99.0% $652,545 65.1% 2015 73.0% 1998 88 ALF/MC 3.17 $404.00 $390.32 47,277 6.70% 6.77% Building Area 5.83% $210,000,000 ($23,883,684) $14,091,000 IALF/MC Arm's length $37,974,684 $1,830,110 Cash Going concern ($3,330,311) Arm's length $13,588 Cash $21,280 2014 $5,160,421 62.9% ALF/MC 86 91.1% Income Data 5.53 8.53% 6.73% 94.0% 1989 1,037 64.5% 6.71% 5.27 Legend at Tulsa Hills 157 Brookdale Castle Hills Sales Price per Unit Analysis The first unit of comparison we will develop is the sales price per living unit. We have selected to analyze sales price per unit as opposed to sales price per bed because the number of beds operated at a given facility may fluctuate while the number of units is generally fixed. The sales will first be adjusted for the following non-physical elements of comparison. Property Rights Conveyed Each of the sales were occupied by residents on short-term agreements at the time of sale. Each comparable was transferred as a going-concern including all FF&E. No adjustments are needed. Financing Terms The comparables sold for cash to the seller, and no adjustments are needed. Conditions of Sale It is noted that although Comparable 5 is a portfolio sale, we have utilized it due to the portfolio containing properties sold that are similar assets. We have adjusted this sale downward by 5% due to the portfolio premium associated with the sale. All of the other sales are similar, so no other adjustments are needed. Occupancy at Sale The comparables were either at stabilized occupancy at the time of sale, requiring no adjustment, or were already adjusted for below stabilized occupancy in the sale write-up. Market Conditions All of the sales are relatively recent; therefore, no adjustments were made for market conditions. 158 Brookdale Castle Hills Summary of Non-Physical Adjustments The adjustments for non-physical elements of comparison follow, along with the resulting adjusted units of comparison for the comparables. $26,000,000 $0 $652,545 $16,844 $17,332 $1,473,241 $7,415 $4,308,800 - $5,042,738 $2,413,249 $19,100,000 $251,316 $297,294 $317,073 $0 $25,270,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $19,100,000 $26,000,000 88 $7,650,000 $1,760,436 $0 $0 $0 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% $0 $0 3 Adjustments For Non-Physical Elements of Comparison Comparable Number Element of Comparison 21 4 Conditions of Sale $316,395$192,382 1,037 $37,974,684 ($10,500,000) $0 $14,091,000 $199,500,000Adjusted Sales Price $86,932Adjusted Sales Price Per Unit Effective Gross Income $21,469 Number of Units 76 85 82 NOI $1,280,153 $25,270,000 0.0% Sales Price Property Name Chisholm Trail Estates $7,650,000 $0 $0Property Rights Conveyed 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Financing Terms The Oaks at Flower Mound Orchard Park at Katy 0.0% Colonial Oaks Sugar Land $0Market Conditions NOI Per Unit $13,588 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% $0 $27,210,000 6 0.0% $1,830,110 $0 $0 0.0% 0.0% $0 5 Carriage Inn/Village on the Park Portfolio Legend at Tulsa Hills $27,210,000$210,000,000 $0 -5.0% 0.0% $5,160,421 86 $0 $0 0.0% $21,280 Physical Elements of Comparison We will now adjust for the following physical elements of comparison. Location Location adjustments will be determined by comparing the median home value (as determined by Esri) within a 5 mile radius of the subject property to the corresponding value for each of the comparable properties. The median home value of each property is shown in the following table. Comparable Number City, State Median Sales Price Subject San Antonio, Texas $168,465 1 Sugarl Land, TX $435,765 2 Katy, TX $354,439 3 Flower Mound, TX $356,900 4 Kenne, TX $116,927 5 Conroe, TX $146,245 6 Tulsa, OK $119,400 Median Home Sales Price by 5 Mile Ring Radius Comparables 1, 2 and 3 have been adjusted downward by 20% due to their significantly superior location when compared to the subject property. Comparable 5 has not been adjusted, due to its relative similarity in location. Comparable 6 has been adjusted upward by 5% due to its slightly 159 Brookdale Castle Hills inferior location. Comparable 4 has been adjusted upward by 10% due to its inferior location when compared to the subject property. Physical Characteristics The comparables vary in a number of physical characteristics in comparison to the subject. All are similar in basic design, being seniors housing facilities with interior hallways and an extensive amount of common areas. However, there are some variances that will require adjustment. Age We will base the age adjustments upon the effective age for each comparable in comparison to the subject, as shown below. 12 15 2015 5.5% -18.2% 1 18 Calculated Adjustment (% Variance Applied To Price Per Unit) 12 55 5555 -$54,053$13,708 2017 2016 Property Name Chisholm Trail Estates 12 5.5% 12 (11) 3 -20.0% 55 14.5% -$57,526 -18.2% $27,983 8 -$63,415 2014 The Oaks at Flower Mound 6 Age/Condition Adjustment Calculations Element of Comparison 2017 Economic Life 3 55 2016 Less Year Sale Built $4,742 Variance/Economic Life 12Subject's Effective Age 2 1 2015 19981998 Est. Effective Age of Sale 55 Legend at Tulsa Hills 2014 12 3 Variance in Effect. Age 18 3 1 3 Age of Sale at Sale 2 (10) (10) 4 Comparable Number 27 2 Carriage Inn/Village on the Park Portfolio 2016 2016Year of Sale Orchard Park at Katy Colonial Oaks Sugar Land 1989 5 Quality The comparables are all modern seniors housing projects and do not require adjustment for quality. Economic Characteristics In this adjustment process, economic characteristics are not considered, as they are reflected in the adjustments for location and physical characteristics. Note that following this process, we will also conduct a ranking and statistical analysis based solely upon income characteristics. Use/Zoning The comparables all have the same use and are zoned to permit that use. No adjustments are required for use/zoning. Non-Realty Components Each of the sales included real property, FF&E, and business value. Allocations of the contribution of each component to the sales price were not provided. We will not adjust for non-realty components in the adjustment process but will allocate the subject’s value to its components in the conclusion section of this appraisal. 160 Brookdale Castle Hills Summary of Adjustments for Physical Elements of Comparison The adjustments for physical elements of comparison are as follows: $0 $316,395 0.0% 5.0%10.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% $0 Economic Characteristics $0 0.0% $0 $0 Low of Adjusted Prices $100,367 High of Adjusted Prices $274,689 Average of Adjusted Prices $197,368 $100,367 $220,365 $274,689 $0 $0 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Non-Realty Components $0 $0 $0 $0 $0$0 Final Adjusted Sales Price Per Unit $214,761 $183,782 $190,244 Use/Zoning $0 $0 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% $0 $0$0 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% $0 $0 -54,053 -63,415 $0 $0 -18.2% -57,526 14.5% 27,983 Legend at Tulsa Hills Carriage Inn/Village on the Park Portfolio $0 Age/Condition 13,708 5.5% -18.2% -20.0% 5.5% 4,742 Quality $0 -20.0% -20.0% -20.0% ($50,263) ($59,459) ($63,415) Adjusted Sales Price Per Unit Property Name $0 $15,820 $86,932 $192,382 $8,693 Chisholm Trail Estates 64 5 Adjustments For Physical Elements of Comparison The Oaks at Flower Mound $251,316 Location 0.0% $297,294 Colonial Oaks Sugar Land Orchard Park at Katy $317,073 1 2 3 Element of Comparison Comparable Number Based upon this analysis, a very wide per unit range is indicated. This is due to the fact that economics are the primary factor driving the sales prices of seniors housing properties, not physical differences. Sales Price Trends The following chart displays the average and median price per unit for both independent living and assisted living over the last 5 years. The average and median price per independent living unit was $230,100 and $200,000 in 2017, while the average and median price per assisted living unit was $221,250 and $215,800 in 2017. 161 Brookdale Castle Hills Continuum/Graphing Analysis The data is not extensive enough to accurately derive adjustments for minor physical differences using paired sales or other quantitative adjustment techniques. Furthermore, physical differences between the comparables and the subject are abundant because the comparables vary significantly in location, size, year built and facility composition. These are reasons for the significant variation in sales prices in the preceding example. It is more pertinent to analyze the relationship of price per unit and NOI per unit. This is a relevant measure of income producing potential that should account for the different levels of services offered, varying locations, and differences in the improvements of the comparables. 1 $16,844 $251,316 5 $13,588 $202,507 $86,932 Subject $8,020 ?? 4 $7,415 3 $21,469 $317,073 6 $21,280 $316,395 2 $17,332 $297,294 Continuum Comparable Number NOI Per Unit Sales Price Per Unit 162 Brookdale Castle Hills $0 $50,000 $100,000 $150,000 $200,000 $250,000 $300,000 $350,000 $0 $5,000 $10,000 $15,000 $20,000 $25,000 P ri ce P er U n it NOI Per Unit NOI/Unit Vs. Price/Unit 3 6 2 1 5 4 The sales exhibit a clear trend of increasing prices per unit as the NOI per unit increases. The correlation coefficient is a strong 0.978733 . The statistical forecasted value for the subject based upon the two data series is $107,759 per unit. Based upon this and the prior analysis of physical differences, the indicated value is as follows: X = X = X = $11,160,000 Rounded Low of Range $105,000 97 $10,185,000 $10,190,000 High of Range $115,000 97 $11,155,000 Range Price Per Unit Subject's Units Indicated Value Effective Gross Income Multiplier The effective gross income multipliers (EGIM) for the sales are as follows: Average of EGIM 4.66 73.0% 62.9% 64.5% $2,413,249 $27,210,000 3.17 5.25 High of EGIM 5.27 EGIM 4.43 - $5,160,421 5.27 Effective Gross Income $4,308,800 5.16 Expense Ratio 70.3% – 65.1% Low of EGIM 3.17 $26,000,000 $7,650,000 - $5,042,738 Adjusted Sales Price Item Comparable Number 1 2 Property Name Colonial Oaks Sugar Land Orchard Park at Katy The Oaks at Flower Mound $19,100,000 $37,974,684 $199,500,000 Chisholm Trail Estates Carriage Inn/Village on the Park Portfolio $25,270,000 Legend at Tulsa Hills 3 4 5 6 Effective Gross Income Multipliers The subject’s forecasted stabilized expense ratio is 76.3%, which is most similar to Sales 1 and 4; therefore, the most weight is placed in these sales. 163 Brookdale Castle Hills 0.00 1.00 2.00 3.00 4.00 5.00 6.00 0.0% 20.0% 40.0% 60.0% 80.0% 100.0% 120.0% E G I M u lti p lie r Expense Ratio Expense Ratio Vs. EGI Multiplier 1 2 3 4 5 6 The sales display a strong correlation between expense ratios and EGIMs. Based primarily upon this relationship and the forecasted value shown above we selected an EGIM range of 3.20 to 3.70 to apply to the subject’s pro forma EGI. The indicated value using the EGIM unit of comparison is as follows: X = X = X =High of Range 3.70 $3,279,841 $12,135,412 $12,140,000 Rounded Low of Range 3.20 $3,279,841 $10,495,492 $10,500,000 Range EGI Multiplier Forecast EGI Indicated Value 164 Brookdale Castle Hills Indicated Value via Sales Comparison The value indications are as follows: Add Excess Land Indicated Value $10,800,000 Less Rent Loss ($40,000) Less Unstabilized Discount ($1,070,000) Less Repairs $0 Summary of Sales Comparison Approach Value Indications Unit of Comparison Low of Range High of Range Concluded Value - Stabilized Basis $10,830,000 Sales Price Per Unit $10,190,000 $11,160,000 EGIM $10,500,000 $12,140,000 Shared Range $10,500,000 $11,160,000 $1,080,000 In developing the sales price per unit analysis, we first attempted to adjust the sales based solely upon differences in physical elements of comparison, such as age, location, and quality. This is due to the fact that economics is the primary factor driving the sales prices of seniors housing properties, not physical differences. Following the physical adjustment analysis, we conducted an analysis of NOI per unit compared to sales price per unit. This comparison showed a strong correlation between the two variables. We relied heavily upon the forecasted statistical value for the subject in deriving the indicated price per unit for the subject. However, since this method relies upon NOI per unit, it is closely related to the income capitalization approach, but it is a very valid technique. The EGIM analysis is less dependent upon the accurate estimation of NOI. An investor considering purchasing the subject might place substantial weight in an EGIM analysis as it is a commonly used tool. Both units of comparison are well supported and appropriate. We place roughly equal weight in the two analyses and conclude an indicated value of $10,830,000 for the subject on a stabilized basis. Since the analysis is based upon stabilized operations, adjustments are made if appropriate for rent loss to stabilization, an unstabilized asset discount, repairs, and profit for lease-up risk. The indicated value after adjustments is $10,800,000 for the subject. 165 Brookdale Castle Hills Land Valuation To develop an opinion of the subject’s land value, as if vacant and available to be developed to its highest and best use, we utilize the sales comparison approach. The sales comparison method is the most common technique for valuing land, and it is the most reliable and pertinent method when adequate sales data can be located. To use the sales comparison technique, sales of similar parcels of land are analyzed. Current contracts of sales and listings can also be considered. The comparables are analyzed, compared, and adjusted to provide a value indication for the land being appraised. This method of land valuation is utilized in this report. Extent of the Data Search We have searched the subject’s market area for recent sales of sites with comparable size, shape, and access. The search procured four recent sales. Detailed comparable profiles are included in the addenda of this report. Transactions Confirmed A summary of comparable land sales considered follows. Factual data regarding each comparable has been obtained from the grantor (seller), grantee (buyer), broker, or some other knowledgeable party. 166 Brookdale Castle Hills Brookdale Castle Hills: 1207 Jackson Keller Road, San Antonio, Texas 78213 Land Comparable 1: 8130 Hausman Road, San Antonio Land Comparable 3: 7227 Lamb Road, San Antonio Land Comparable 2: 2803 Mossrock Drive, San Antonio Land Comparable 4: 9936 Culebra Road, San Antonio Comparable Land Sale Location Map 167 Brookdale Castle Hills June-17 January-17 364,162 Site Size (Square Feet) Conditions of Sale Arm's length Arm's length Arm's length 9936 Culebra Road, San Antonio $3.43 All available Unknown 87,120 Arm's length Date of Sale January-17 June-17 $1,250,000 $478,500 180,774 Commercial Sales Price Per Square Foot 435,600 Proposed Use Multi-Family Unknown $5.49 All available $5.97 $6.91 All available All available Unknown Multi-Family Commercial Unknown Summary of Land Comparables 4321 Comparable NumberElement of Comparison Sales Price Financing Terms Cash to seller Property Rights Conveyed Address 8130 Hausman Road, San Antonio 2803 Mossrock Drive, San Antonio Fee simple Cash to seller 7227 Lamb Road, San Antonio $1,250,000 Fee simple Fee simple Fee simple $2,600,000 Cash to sellerCash to seller Zoning Utilities Adjustment for Non-Physical Elements of Comparison Adjustments are now made for non-physical elements of comparison. We shall then consider physical elements of comparison for the relevant units of comparison for the subject. Property Rights Conveyed The sales all involved the conveyance of fee simple interests. No adjustment is required for property rights conveyed because the fee simple interest in the subject site is under consideration. Financing Terms The comparables sold for cash and/or on cash equivalent terms and do not require adjustment. Conditions of Sale This adjustment is made to account for atypical motivation of either the buyer or seller in a given sale. The comparables considered all sold under arm’s length conditions and require no adjustment. Market Conditions The comparables are all relatively recent sales and require no adjustment for market conditions. 168 Brookdale Castle Hills Summary of Adjustments The adjusted units of comparison will require further analysis for physical characteristics. Non- physical adjustments are summarized in the following table: Financing Terms $0 $0 Adjusted Sales Price $1,250,000 Market Conditions $0 $0 $478,500 $0 $1,250,000 $1,250,000 $478,500 $0 $0 $0 Comparable Number 435,600 Adjusted Sales Price Per Square Foot $2,600,000 180,774 $0 $1,250,000 Sales Price 3 Site Size (Square Feet) 364,162 87,120 0.0% 0.0% Property Rights Conveyed $0 $0 $0 $0 Conditions of Sale $0 $3.43 $5.49 $6.91 $5.97 21 Adjustments For Non-Physical Elements of Comparison Element of Comparison $0 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% $2,600,000 $0 4 Adjustment for Physical Elements of Comparison The following physical elements of comparison are now analyzed. We shall analyze the sales using the sales price per square foot of comparison because the brokers and market participants we have contacted indicated that is the most common unit of comparison for land like the subject. Site Size Comparables 1 and 4 are larger in size and are adjusted upward. Comparables 2 and 3 are smaller in size and adjusted downward in comparison. Zoning The comparables are all zoned to permit similar development. No adjustments are needed. Functional Utility The comparables and subject are all functionally adequate sites. No adjustments are needed. Location The comparables are all in superior locations; therefore, a 5% downward adjustment is applied to each comparable. Summary of Adjustments The adjustment table for physical elements of comparison follows: 169 Brookdale Castle Hills 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% $6.27 Low of Adjusted Prices $3.43 Average of Adjusted Prices $5.15 Final Adjusted Sales Price Per Square Foot $3.43 $4.67 $6.22 -5.0% -5.0% -5.0% -5.0% $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Site Size $0.17 -$0.55 -$0.35 Adjusted Sales Price Per Square Foot Comparable Number $0.60 $5.97 2 Zoning 3 ($0.30)($0.27) High of Adjusted Prices $6.27 Location $5.49 ($0.17) Element of Comparison 1 5.0% -10.0% -5.0% 10.0% $0.00 Functional Utility $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $6.91 4 Adjustments for Physical Elements of Comparison $3.43 ($0.35) $0.00 Indicated Value of the Site as Though Vacant Based upon these sales, a price per square foot of $5.15 is concluded to be reasonable. 294,426 X $5.15 = Indicated Value Rounded $1,516,294 $1,520,000 Subject's Square Footage X Indicated Price Per Square Foot = Note that there is approximately 5 acres of excess land. The excess land is valued similar to that of the primary site as they are similar in access and visibility. However, the subject currently has a building on the site which would need to be demolished given it has no contributory value and is obsolete. Therefore, the cost of demolition is deducted to determine the as-is value. The building is 10,206 square feet with a demolition cost estimated at $3.75 per square foot based upon Marshall & Swift, which results in a cost of $38,273 or $40,000 rounded. Subject's Square Footage X $1,121,670 $1,120,000 Indicated Price Per Square Foot Rounded Excess Land Valuation Indicated Value = $38,273 ($40,000) $1,080,000 Less Demolition of Existing Improvements Indicated Value = 217,800 X $5.15 = 170 Brookdale Castle Hills FF&E Analysis JLL maintains a database of cost comparables. These represent either actual costs or total budgeted costs based upon construction bids. Current comparables are shown as follows. Item Comp 1 Comp 2 Comp 3 Comp 4 Average Identification - City Dallas San Antonio San Antonio McKinney - State Texas Texas Texas Texas - Levels of Care AL, MC AL, MC AL, MC AL, MC - Units 201 105 109 73 122 Beds 229 128 137 88 146 Building Area (Square Feet) 198,000 104,185 86,668 69,702 114,639 Cost in Dollars - Items in Marshall & Swift Base Costs - Total FF&E $1,432,003 $950,000 $876,000 $900,000 $1,039,501 TOTAL COST $53,609,069 $22,085,515 $22,300,000 $14,472,898 $28,116,871 Cost Per Unit - Total FF&E $7,124 $9,048 $8,037 $12,329 $9,134 Cost Per Square Foot - Total FF&E $0.04 $0.09 $0.09 $0.18 $0.10 Construction Cost Comparables Replacement Cost of FF&E The average cost per unit of FF&E for the cost comparables previously presented was $9,134 per unit. We will use this to estimate the subject’s FF&E cost. X = X = $890,000$886,034 Estimated FF&E Cost FF&E Cost New RoundedFF&E Cost NewFF&E Cost Per UnitSubject's Units $9,13497 Analysis of Depreciation The FF&E has depreciated. FF&E depreciates more rapidly than real property, often requiring replacement several times during the life of a real estate asset. We will use an average economic life of 15 years for the subject’s FF&E, resulting in depreciation as follows: 7 / 15 Total Incurable Depreciation Times Percent Depreciated Rounded -46.7% $890,000Replacement Cost New Physical Depreciation to FF&E ($415,333) ($420,000) 7.5 / 15 Physical Depreciation to FF&E - Upon Stabilization Replacement Cost New $890,000 Times Percent Depreciated -50.0% Total Incurable Depreciation ($445,000) Rounded ($450,000) 171 Brookdale Castle Hills Absorption and Income Loss Analysis In this section, we will estimate the subject’s absorption and the corresponding income loss during the lease-up period needed for the subject to reach the forecast stabilized occupancy level. Current Status As of the effective date of this analysis, the subject was 71.3% occupied. Occupancy at the subject property has lagged that of the market. Management noted that its location and layout are the two biggest factors impacting occupancy. The majority of incoming residents cannot live on the second floor due to evacuation restrictions; therefore, the second floor units are difficult to lease-up. In addition, the subject’s location and visibility is inferior to competing properties in the market. Absorption The subject’s occupancy is as follows: Resident Day Occupancy Year Ending 12/17 36,865 25,227 68.4% Item 12/16 Year Ending Annual 36,865 Actual Resident Days 25,27823,638 25,116 Budget 3 Months For Year Potential Resident Days Occupancy Percent 64.1% 68.6% 68.1% Ending Ending 05/18 12/18 36,865 36,865 NIC MAP tracks move-in rates for properties in the 31 largest US markets. This data will aid in the establishment of an absorption rate for the subject. 172 Brookdale Castle Hills Based upon this data and considering the prevailing market occupancy level, we are forecasting that the subject will require an additional 6 months to reach the forecasted stabilized occupancy level. The indicated lease-up pace is as follows: Total Operating Beds 101 Times Forecasted Stabilized Occupancy 80.0% Beds Occupied at Stabilization 81 Less Current Number Occupied 69 Beds To Be Rented to Reach Stabilization 12 Forecasted Absorption Period (Months) 6 Forecasted Net Absorption Per Month (Beds) 2.0 Lease-Up Forecast Quarter Independent Living Assisted Living Memory Care 1Q12 5.6 2.7 1.7 2Q12 5.8 3.0 1.5 3Q12 5.1 3.1 1.7 4Q12 4.5 3.3 1.6 1Q13 4.5 3.0 1.8 2Q13 5.0 2.6 1.6 3Q13 4.3 2.7 1.4 4Q13 4.2 2.4 1.3 1Q14 4.0 2.4 1.4 2Q14 4.0 2.3 1.3 3Q14 4.3 2.3 1.4 4Q14 3.6 2.3 1.3 1Q15 3.6 2.3 1.4 2Q15 3.1 2.3 1.2 3Q15 3.4 2.2 1.3 4Q15 3.5 2.0 1.1 1Q16 3.8 2.0 1.3 2Q16 3.3 2.0 1.2 3Q16 3.3 1.9 1.1 4Q16 3.6 1.9 0.9 1Q17 3.2 2.1 1.0 2Q17 2.9 2.1 1.1 3Q17 3.3 2.3 1.0 4Q17 3.4 2.2 1.0 1Q18 3.5 2.1 0.9 National Absorption Averages Units 173 Brookdale Castle Hills Income Loss Forecast NOI during the forecasted months of remaining absorption is projected in the tables that follow, based upon the preceding assumptions. The income loss is not discounted as it represents a negative, rather than positive cash flow. $3,279,841 ($2,261,573) $1,018,268 71% 89% 6 90% Month Forecast % of EGI Earned Pro Forma EGI Projected EGI Forecast % of Expenses Incurred Pro Forma Expenses Forecast Expenses Forecast NOI Pro Forma NOI NOI Loss (Difference Between Stabilized and Actual) 1 89.1% $273,320 $243,553 90.0% (188,464) ($169,618) $73,935 $84,856 $10,921 2 90.9% $273,320 $248,514 91.7% (188,464) ($172,759) $75,755 $84,856 $9,101 3 92.7% $273,320 $253,475 93.3% (188,464) ($175,900) $77,575 $84,856 $7,281 4 94.6% $273,320 $258,436 95.0% (188,464) ($179,041) $79,395 $84,856 $5,461 5 96.4% $273,320 $263,398 96.7% (188,464) ($182,182) $81,215 $84,856 $3,640 6 98.2% $273,320 $268,359 98.3% (188,464) ($185,323) $83,036 $84,856 $1,820 7 100.0% $273,320 $273,320 100.0% (188,464) ($188,464) $84,856 $84,856 $0 Total $38,224 $40,000 Pro Forma Expenses at Stabilization Pro Forma NOI Income Loss During Absorption Period Pro Forma EGI Total Income Loss Rounded Starting Economic Occupancy Level Total Absorption Period (Months) Expense Percentage at Beginning of Period Starting Physical Occupancy The total indicated income loss during absorption is $40,000. 174 Brookdale Castle Hills Conclusion Market Value of the Specified Assets of the Business As Is The following indications of value have been developed for the subject on an as is basis: Approach to Value Income Capitalization - Direct Capitalization Sales Comparison Cost $10,800,000 Not Developed As Is Value Indications Value Indication $10,700,000 The direct capitalization method was developed for this report. The income capitalization process is well supported and highly pertinent to the appraisal of income property such as the subject. Market rent was estimated after a review of competing local properties. Total income and expenses were estimated based upon analysis of similar income and expense comparables with consideration to the subject’s historical expenses. This is the approach most utilized in the market and is considered the most relevant approach to valuing the subject. The sales comparison approach was also developed and is relatively well supported. Market participants rely upon sales to provide general ranges for valuation purposes but generally place much more weight on the income approach. The cost approach was not developed in this appraisal. Buyers of senior housing properties place little credence in the cost approach. The estimation of depreciation is difficult to do with any precision, especially for older buildings. Thus, the cost approach was not developed. After consideration of the reliability and relevance of each approach, the direct capitalization approach is given primary weight, supported by the sales comparison approach. We conclude that the indicated value is $10,700,000. Prospective Market Value of the Specified Assets of the Business upon Stabilization Using direct capitalization of the forecasted NOI on the forecasted date of stabilization, we determined that the indicated prospective future value of the subject, as of December 29, 2018, will be $11,950,000 for the subject. Investment Value Assuming Not-For-Profit Operations and Ad Valorem Tax Exemption Using the direct capitalization of the forecasted NOI assuming not-for profit ownership and tax exempt status, we determined that the indicated value of the subject is $13,680,000. 175 Brookdale Castle Hills Value Allocation The above concluded value is on a going concern basis. In order to allocate the going concern value, several different methodologies can be used. These include the lease analysis, the management fee capitalization method, and the cost residual method. REITs and other buyers of nursing facility real estate typically determine market rent based upon a lease coverage ratio. According to Health Care REIT, HCP, Grubb and Ellis Health Care REIT, and Aviv REIT, a typical lease coverage ratio for assisted living is 1.01 or higher, and typical coverage for a nursing facility is 1.3 or higher. For purposes of this analysis, a coverage ratio of 1.20 is used. Lease Analysis The lease analysis determines the value of the real estate and FF&E based upon facility lease data excluding intangibles. The residual is then allocated to intangibles. For the lease analysis, we utilize our pro forma NOI. From this, we determine the value associated with the real estate based income stream. This is then capitalized at a lower rate than the going concern NOI due to the lower risk factor. For comparison purposes, the capitalization rate used is 6.75% based upon recent REIT transactions noted below. The value of the FF&E is estimated based upon a typical cost per unit less depreciation. Examples of relevant transactions in support of our forecasts include: 176 Brookdale Castle Hills Property/Portfolio Facility Type Number of Beds/Units State (s) Date of Sale Year 1 Rent Year 1 NOI Sales Price Lease Coverage Ratio Cap Rate Memory Care Facilities - The LaSalle Group MC 223 TX & IL March-17 $4,326,000 - $61,800,000 - 7.00% Prestige Senior Living AL, MC 102 OR March-17 $1,834,000 - $26,200,000 - 7.00% 4 SNF/ALFs in Dallas Fort Worth SNF, AL 568 TX December-16 $8,600,000 - $95,900,000 - 8.97% Mainstreet - 3 Memory Care MC 171 AR & TX November-16 $3,477,550 - $44,300,000 - 7.85% 5 Bickfords AL 277 IA, MO, IL & NE May-16 $6,343,750 $8,564,063 $87,500,000 1.35 7.25% Care Trust AL 440 FL, IN, MD & WI March-16 $2,300,000 - $27,000,000 - 8.52% Symphony Post Acute SNF N/A IL November-15 $24,200,000 - $276,200,000 - 8.76% Old Mill Rehab SNF 44 NE October-15 $1,012,275 $1,707,028 $13,011,247 1.69 7.78% Senior Lifestyle AL, MC N/A WI October-15 $9,230,000 - $142,000,000 6.50% Pristine Portfolio SNF, AL N/A OH October-15 $17,200,000 - $175,000,000 - 9.83% 10 Texas SNFs SNF 1,142 TX July-15 $12,325,000 $15,567,134 $145,000,000 1.26 8.50% NMS Healthcare SNF 678 MD June-15 $20,475,500 $30,712,500 $234,000,000 1.50 8.75% Aviv Portfolio SNF 26520 US March-15 $201,000,000 $251,250,000 $3,000,000,000 1.25 6.70% Vista at Westover SNF 120 TX February-15 $1,500,000 $2,114,449 $20,000,000 1.41 7.50% Vista at Westover SNF 120 TX February-15 $1,500,000 $2,114,449 $20,000,000 1.41 7.50% Bethany Rehab SNF 170 CO February-15 $1,700,000 $2,251,828 $17,950,000 1.32 9.47% Sabra/Holiday IL 2,850 Various September-14 $30,300,000 - $550,000,000 - 5.51% 6 CCRCs CCRC N/A TX July-14 $14,136,000 - $186,000,000 7.60% 3 California SNFs SNF N/A CA May-14 $1,369,000 - $13,350,000 - 10.25% Oregon Portfolio SNF, AL, MC N/A OR April-14 $3,528,000 - $42,000,000 - 8.40% 4 Texas SNFs SNF N/A TX April-14 $5,100,000 - $53,700,000 - 9.50% Bridgecrest Rehab SNF 119 TX February-14 $1,444,000 $2,160,000 - 1.50 - Newcastle/Holiday Portfolio I IL 2,882 Various December-13 $32,675,813 $39,537,733 $502,704,813 1.21 6.50% Newcastle/Holiday Portfolio II IL 3,003 Various December-13 $32,867,701 $39,441,241 $505,656,938 1.20 6.50% NHI/Holiday Portfolio IL 2,841 Various December-13 $31,920,070 $38,623,285 $491,078,000 1.21 6.50% 3 Illinois SNFs SNF N/A IL November-13 $734,988 - $7,000,000 - 10.50% Covenant Dove Portfolio SNF 5,717 Various October-13 $47,000,000 $65,318,000 $525,000,000 1.39 8.95% Ventas/Holiday Portfolio IL 3,138 Various October-13 $48,980,000 $57,306,600 $790,000,000 1.17 6.20% NHI-Marysville OH AL, MC 76 OH July-13 $1,150,000 $1,164,375 $15,300,000 1.01 7.52% SNFs in NC SNF 90 NC June-13 $791,568 - $9,594,764 - 8.25% SNFs in NC SNF 90 NC June-13 $791,568 - $9,594,764 - 8.25% Aviv REIT - Advocat Acute & SNF N/A KY September-12 $1,009,800 - $9,900,000 - 10.20% Aviv REIT Safe Haven Acute & SNF N/A ID September-12 $660,000 - $6,000,000 - 11.00% LTC, Inc - Two SNFs in Ohio SNF 288 OH August-12 $4,590,000 - $54,000,000 - 8.50% LTC, Inc - SNF in TX SNF 90 TX July-12 $585,000 - $6,500,000 - 9.00% Red Oak Health & Rehab SNF 144 TX March-12 $1,612,000 $2,418,000 $18,600,000 1.50 8.67% Laurel Health Care SNF, AL 2,777 Various No Sale Date $25,925,000 $36,500,000 No Sale 1.41 No Sale Platinum Portfolio SNF, AL 937 Various No Sale Date $9,880,000 $11,790,000 No Sale 1.19 No Sale Prelude at Woodbury SNF, AL 30 MN No Sale Date $3,287,000 $4,273,100 No Sale 1.30 No Sale Bridgecrest Rehab SNF 119 TX No Sale Date $1,444,000 $2,160,000 No Sale 1.50 No Sale Village at Richardson SNF 206 TX No Sale Date $1,377,500 $1,719,071 No Sale 1.25 No Sale AVERAGE 1.34 8.16% Leased Fee Sale Comparables The resulting allocation is as follows: As Is Investment Value Assuming Not-For- Profit Ownership and Ad Valorem Exemption Upon Stabilization Forecast NOI $777,971 $1,018,268 $787,774 Divided by Market Lease Coverage Ratio 1.20 1.20 1.20 Income Attributable to Real Estate and FF&E $648,309 $848,557 $656,478 Divided by NNN Cap Rate 6.75% 6.75% 6.75% Indicated Value of Real Estate and FF&E $9,604,583 $12,571,214 $9,725,600 Rounded $9,600,000 $12,570,000 $9,730,000 Allocated Value of FF&E $470,000 $470,000 $440,000 Allocated Value of Land $0 $0 $0 Allocated Value of Improvements $9,130,000 $12,100,000 $9,290,000 Indicated Value of Intangibles and Goodwill $1,100,000 $1,110,000 $2,220,000 Lease Coverage Method Management Fee Capitalization Method For the management fee capitalization method, we will assume that the forecasted management fee reflects income attributable to the business value of the subject. We will then capitalize this 177 Brookdale Castle Hills amount at a higher rate due to the increased risk associated with the business value of the subject. The management fee capitalization method is based upon the Rushmore method commonly used in the valuation of hotels/motels. The capitalization rate used is based upon property management company transactions procured from the BIZCOMPS database summarized below: Business Description Area Date of Sale Earnings Sales Price Cap Rate Property Management Colorado December-09 $1,300 $4,500 28.89% Property Management California November-10 $590 $1,450 40.69% Property Management Florida December-08 $465 $1,350 34.44% Property Management Georgia August-07 $350 $860 40.70% Property Management Phoenix, AZ June-06 $250 $800 31.25% Property Management Phoenix, AZ June-05 $253 $750 33.73% Property Management Phoenix, AZ June-02 $164 $635 25.83% Property Management Florida October-08 $128 $600 21.33% Property Management Florida July-04 $223 $595 37.48% Property Management Florida October-09 $174 $575 30.26% Property Management Florida June-04 $230 $550 41.82% Property Management Florida March-04 $126 $540 23.33% Property Management Colorado August-08 $143 $500 28.60% Property Management Florida January-09 $201 $475 42.32% 32.91% Amounts displayed in thousands. Property Management Company Sale Comparables AVERAGE Based upon these comparables, a capitalization rate of 30.00% is deemed appropriate. This calculation is shown below: As Is Investment Value Upon Stabilization Forecast Management Fee $163,992 $163,992 $166,058 Divided by Management Fee Cap Rate 30.00% 30.00% 30.00% Indicated Intangibles and Goodwill $546,640 $546,640 $553,528 Rounded $550,000 $550,000 $550,000 Management Capitalization Method Cost Residual Method The cost approach was not developed within this appraisal; therefore, we have not calculated any intangible value via the cost residual method. 178 Brookdale Castle Hills Allocation Conclusion The concluded business values, utilizing the above methods, are shown below. For any methodology resulting in negative intangible value, we have not forecasted any intangibles from this respective methodology. For this analysis, we have estimated intangible value as follows. As Is Investment Value Assuming Not-For- Profit Ownership and Ad Valorem Exemption Upon Stabilization Lease Coverage Method $1,100,000 $1,110,000 $2,220,000 Management Fee Capitalization Method $550,000 $550,000 $550,000 Cost Residual Method - - - Indicated Value of Intangibles and Goodwill $830,000 $830,000 $1,390,000 Intangible Value Conclusions The resulting allocations are as follows: As Is Investment Value Assuming Not-For- Profit Ownership and Ad Valorem Exemption Upon Stabilization Real Property $9,400,000 $12,380,000 $10,120,000 FF&E $470,000 $470,000 $440,000 Intangibles and Goodwill $830,000 $830,000 $1,390,000 Market Value of the Specified Assets of the Business $10,700,000 $13,680,000 $11,950,000 Value Allocation(s) Exposure Time Our estimate of value is based upon a typical exposure time for the property type being appraised. Exposure time is assumed to precede the effective date of value. Exposure times vary widely from property to property and are dependent upon a number of factors. These can include the motivation of the owner, the price that the property is offered for sale, the effectiveness of the marketing plan, the availability of financing, etc. We surveyed active market participants, including brokers and buyers, to determine a typical marketing time for seniors housing properties. The respondents were offered the following choices: A. 3 months B. 6 months C. 9 months D. 12 months E. More than 12 months 179 Brookdale Castle Hills The majority, being 35.8% of total respondents, indicated selection B, while 30.2% indicated selection C. Based upon these responses, we conclude that an exposure period of 6 months would be necessary to sell the subject. Marketing Time – JLL Seniors Housing Investor Survey (Winter 2018) Exposure time is assumed to precede the date of value while marketing time is the estimated time from the date of value that would be required to sell the property. When market conditions are stable and not expected to change, exposure time and marketing time are generally the same. Survey respondents reported expected marketing time for seniors-only apartments to be the shortest at five months on average, an indication of the limited supply and investor appetite. Independent and assisted living were anticipated to be marketed for more than a month and a half longer on average. However, survey respondents indicated the length of the marketing period for skilled nursing could be up to 12 months, or over 7 months on average. JLL Seniors Housing Investor Survey Marketing Time (Winter 2018) Seniors-only Apartments Independent Living Assisted Living Skilled Nursing Low 3.0 3.0 6.0 3.0 High 6.0 9.0 9.0 12.0 Avg 5.0 6.6 6.8 7.1 That is the case in this instance, so the estimated marketing time is also six months. 180 Brookdale Castle Hills Final Value Estimate Our analyses and forecasts result in the value conclusion(s) below, which are based upon assumptions, limiting conditions, and definitions presented in this report. Market Value of the Specified Assets of the Business As Is, Fee Simple Estate Effective as of June 29, 2018 $10,700,000 Investment Value Assuming Not-For-Profit Ownership and Ad Valorem Exemption Effective as of June 29, 2018 $13,680,000 Prospective Market Value of the Specified Assets of the Business Upon Stabilization Effective as of December 29, 2018 $11,950,000 Our conclusion(s) are based on terms of cash and a reasonable exposure time of six months prior to the effective date of value. The estimated marketing period is also six months. Appendix A Legal Description Appendix B Maps, Plats, Building Plans brookdale.com Dimensions are approximate. Floor plans may vary. Brookdale Castle Hills 1207 Jackson Keller Road, San Antonio, Texas 78213 | (210) 375-8132 Facility No. 100251 & 100252 BROOKDALE® is a trademark of Brookdale Senior Living Inc., Nashville, TN, USA ® Reg. U.S. Patent and TM Office. 09/14 Floor Plans Studio Approx. 340 – 415 sq. ft. Studio Deluxe Approx. 435 sq. ft. Living Area Bath Studio Approx. 340 - 415 sq. ft. Living Area Bath Studio Deluxe Approx. 435 sq. ft. brookdale.com Dimensions are approximate. Floor plans may vary. Brookdale Castle Hills 1207 Jackson Keller Road, San Antonio, Texas 78213 | (210) 375-8132 Facility No. 100251 & 100252 BROOKDALE® is a trademark of Brookdale Senior Living Inc., Nashville, TN, USA ® Reg. U.S. Patent and TM Office. 09/14 Floor Plans Alcove Approx. 485 sq. ft. One Bedroom Approx. 560 sq. ft. Living Room Sleeping Alcove Bath Alcove Approx 485 sq. ft. Living Room Bedroom Bath One Bedroom Approx. 560 sq.ft. Patio brookdale.com Dimensions are approximate. Floor plans may vary. Brookdale Castle Hills 1207 Jackson Keller Road, San Antonio, Texas 78213 | (210) 375-8132 Facility No. 100251 & 100252 BROOKDALE® is a trademark of Brookdale Senior Living Inc., Nashville, TN, USA ® Reg. U.S. Patent and TM Office. 09/14 Floor Plans Clare Bridge® Private Suite Approx. 315 – 350 sq. ft. Clare Bridge® Shared Suite Approx. 570 sq. ft. 7/1/2018 InterFlood - List Flood Maps https://www.interflood.com/listmaps.aspx?lon=-98.511501&lat=29.506623&address=1207+Jackson+Keller+Rd&City=San%20Antonio&state=TX&zip=… 2/3 http://www.alamode.com/ Appendix C Comparable Profiles Unit Sq. Ft. Fee Basis Base Rate Per Day/Month 400 Monthly $3,550.00 520 Monthly $4,275.00 Property Identification Name: Franklin Park Sonterra Address: 18323 Sonterra Pl Rent Comparable Zip Code: 78258 Municipality: San Antonio County: Bexas State: Texas Year Opened: 2010 Physical Data Property Type IALF Unit/Bed Mix Number of Nursing Beds: Number of AL Beds: 52 Meals Per Day: 3 per day Utilities: All but tel Housekeeping: Weekly HK Number of IL Units: 150 Services Included In Rents Occupancy & Census Occupancy: 92.0% 1/1 Priv AL Rental Rates Bed Type Studio Priv AL Other Fees Community Fees: $2,000 Level of Care Charges: 3 LOC $400-$1200 Second Person Fees: $800 Unit Sq. Ft. Fee Basis Base Rate Per Day/Month N/A Monthly $4,500.00 Community Fees: $2,000 Level of Care Charges: All inclusive Other Fees Rental Rates Bed Type Studio P Occupancy & Census Meals Per Day: 3 per day Utilities: All but cable/tel Housekeeping: Weekly HK Number of IL Units: 0 Services Included In Rents Unit/Bed Mix Number of Nursing Beds: 0 Number of AL Beds: 36 Year Opened: 1997 Physical Data Property Type ALZ Zip Code: 78218 Municipality: San Antonio County: Bexas State: Texas Property Identification Name: Colonial Gardens Address: 10 Lynn Batts Ln Rent Comparable Unit Sq. Ft. Fee Basis Base Rate Per Day/Month 371 Monthly $4,000.00 474 Monthly $4,250.00 Monthly $5,050.00 235 Monthly $6,000.00 Community Fees: $500 Level of Care Charges: AL LOC N/A MC All inclusive Second Person Fees: $1,000 Other Fees 1/1 Priv AL 2/2 Priv AL Studio Priv MC Rental Rates Bed Type Studio Priv AL Occupancy & Census Occupancy: 100.0% Meals Per Day: 3 per day Utilities: All but tel Housekeeping: Weekly HK Number of IL Units: 160 Services Included In Rents Unit/Bed Mix Number of Nursing Beds: Number of AL Beds: 80 Year Opened: 2011 Physical Data Property Type IALF/MC Zip Code: 78230 Municipality: San Antonio County: Bexas State: San Antonio Property Identification Name: The Adante Address: 2702 Cembalo Blvd Rent Comparable Unit Sq. Ft. Fee Basis Base Rate Per Day/Month 340 Monthly $3,900.00 462 Monthly $4,000.00 580 Monthly $4,000.00 322 Monthly $4,400.00 Community Fees: $1,500 Level of Care Charges: 5 LOC $400 Each for AL/MC Second Person Fees: $795 Other Fees 1/1 Priv Studio SP MC Studio Priv MC Rental Rates Bed Type Studio Priv AL Occupancy & Census Occupancy: 92.0% Meals Per Day: 3 per day Utilities: All but tel Housekeeping: Weekly HK Number of IL Units: 0 Services Included In Rents Unit/Bed Mix Number of Nursing Beds: 0 Number of AL Beds: 109 Year Opened: 2016 Physical Data Property Type ALF/MC Zip Code: 78248 Phone Number Contact Name: Municipality: San Antonio County: Bexas State: Texas Property Identification Name: Heartis San Antonio Address: 15430 Huebner Rd Rent Comparable Unit Sq. Ft. Fee Basis Base Rate Per Day/Month Monthly $1,182.00 Comments: OPENING 16 UNITS THIS WEEK. Community Fees: $2,000 Level of Care Charges: Levels Second Person Fees: Other Fees Entrance Fees: Rental Rates Bed Type Studio SP Occupancy & Census Occupancy: 100.0% Meals Per Day: 3 per day Utilities: All but tel Housekeeping: Weekly HK Number of IL Units: 0 Services Included In Rents Unit/Bed Mix Number of Nursing Beds: 0 Number of AL Beds: 64 Year Opened: 1998 Physical Data Property Type ALZ Zip Code: 78231 Municipality: San Antonio County: Bexar State: Texas Property Identification Name: Arden Courts - San Antonio Address: 15290 Huebner Rd Rent Comparable Rent Comparable Property Identification Name: Brookdale San Antonio Address: 9203 Cinnamon Hills Municipality: San Antonio County: Bexar State: Texas Zip Code: 78240 Phone Number 210-641-5046 Contact Name: Marketing Physical Data Property Type Assisted Living & Memory Care Year Opened: 1998 Number of Stories: 2 Unit/Bed Mix Number of AL Beds: 82 Number of MC Units: 30 Services Included In Rents Meals Per Day: 3 Utilities: All but phone Housekeeping: Weekly Rent Comparable (Cont.) Occupancy & Census Occupancy: 80.0% Rental Rates Bed Type Unit Sq. Ft. Fee Basis Base Rate Per Day/Month Assisted Living Studio 286 Monthly $2,550 1/1 469 Monthly $3,370 1/2 600 Monthly $3,630 2/2 728 Monthly $3,830 Memory Care Companion 286 Monthly $3,500 Private 313 Monthly $4,290 Other Fees Community Fees: $2,500 Level of Care Charges: AL care is a-la-carte, up to $2,500/mo. MC is all-inclusive. Second Person Fees: $750 Seniors Housing Sale Profile Location & Property Identification Colonial Oaks Sugar Land Assisted Living & Memory Care 13825 Lexington Blvd Sugar Land, TX 77478 Fort Bend Houston MSA FC Colonial Oaks AL Seniors Investors II, LLC Closed No 3/22/2016 $19,100,000 Warranty Deed 2016135758 Fee Simple Going Concern 100.00 All cash Bradley Grossa Confirmed-Other Pro Forma $4,308,800 $3,028,647 $1,280,153 70.3% Yes Yes Sale Indicators $251,316 Price per Unit: Price per SF of GBA: $404.00 EGIM: 4.43 Cap Rate: 6.70% Site and Improvement Data Land - SF(Gross): Care/Housing Types: Year Built: Property Condition: Construction Quality: No. of Buildings/Stories: GBA-SF: No. of Units: 189,312 Assisted Living/Memory Care 1998 Good Good 1/1 47,277 76 Unit Summary Care Type # Units # Beds Assisted Living Memory Care Property Name: Sub-Property Type: Address: City/State/Zip: County: MSA: Sale Information Grantor: Grantee: Sale Status: Portfolio Sale: Date of Sale: Contract Sale Price: Document Type: Recording No.: Property Rights: % of Interest Conveyed: Financing: Verified By: Verification Type: Income Data Operating Data Type: Effective Gross Income: Expenses: Net Operating Income: Expense Ratio: Reserves Included: Management Included: Colonial Oaks Surgar Land The facility was reported to be 99% occupied at the time of sale. The facility operates with 76 units and 78 beds. The facility at the time of sale was considered to be of good quality and good condition. Comments Total Units/Beds In Operation: 76/78 76 Total Units: 53 23 55 23 Seniors Housing Sale Profile Location & Property Identification Property Name: Sub-Property Type: Address: City/State/Zip: County: MSA: Orchard Park at Katy Assisted Living & Memory Care 24802 Kingsland Blvd. Katy, TX 77494 Harris Houston MSA Sale Information Grantor: Grantee: Sale Status: Portfolio Sale: Date of Sale: Contract Sale Price: Document Type: Recording No.: Property Rights: % of Interest Conveyed: Financing: Verified By: Verification Type: Katy Orchard Park LLC. Welltower Inc. Closed No 05/1/2017 $25,270,000 Warranty Deed RP-2017-186019 Fee Simple Going Concern 100.00 All cash Bradley Grossa Confirmed-Other Income Data Operating Data Type: Trailing Actuals n/a Effective Gross Income: Expenses: n/a Net Operating Income: $1,473,241 Expense Ratio: n/a Reserves Included: Yes Management Included: Yes Sale Indicators $266,000 Price per Unit: Price per SF of GBA: $390.32 EGIM: n/a Cap Rate: 5.83% Site and Improvement Data Land - SF(Gross): Care/Housing Types: Year Built: Property Condition: Construction Quality: No. of Buildings/Stories: GBA-SF: No. of Units: 217,800 Assisted Living/Memory Care 2014 Excellent Excellent 1/2 64,742 95 Unit Summary Care Type # Units # Beds Assisted Living Memory Care Orchard Park at Katy The facility was reported to be 98% occupied at the time of sale. The facility was operated by The Orchard Company at the time of sale with Sagora Senior Living operating the facility following the sale. Comments Total Units/Beds In Operation: 95 95 Total Units: 75 20 Seniors Housing Sale Profile Location & Property Identification The Oaks at Flower Mound Assisted Living & Memory Care 3281 Long Prairie Rd. Flower Mound, TX 75022 Denton Dallas-Fort Worth MSA FM Senior Living Realty CSH Flower Mound, LLC Closed No 12/19/2016 $26,000,000 Warranty Deed 2016-161972 Fee Simple Going Concern 100.00 All cash Bradley Grossa Confirmed-Other Pro Forma $5,042,738 $3,282,302 $1,760,436 65.1% Yes Yes Sale Indicators $317,073 Price per Unit: Price per SF of GBA: $355.62 EGIM: 5.16 Cap Rate: 6.77% Site and Improvement Data Land - SF(Gross): Care/Housing Types: Year Built: Property Condition: Construction Quality: No. of Buildings/Stories: GBA-SF: No. of Units: 212,311 Assisted Living/Memory Care 2015 Excellent Excellent 1/2 73,111 82 Unit Summary Care Type # Units # Beds Assisted Living Memory Care Property Name: Sub-Property Type: Address: City/State/Zip: County: MSA: Sale Information Grantor: Grantee: Sale Status: Portfolio Sale: Date of Sale: Contract Sale Price: Document Type: Recording No.: Property Rights: % of Interest Conveyed: Financing: Verified By: Verification Type: Income Data Operating Data Type: Effective Gross Income: Expenses: Net Operating Income: Expense Ratio: Reserves Included: Management Included: The Oaks at Flower Mound The facility was reported to be 95% occupied at the time of sale. The facility operates with 82 units and 92 beds. The facility at the time of sale was considered to be of excellent quality and excellent condition. Comments Total Units/Beds In Operation: 82/92 82 Total Units: 58 24 58 34 Seniors Housing Sale Profile Location & Property Identification Property Name: Chisholm Trail Estates Sub-Property Type: Independent and Assisted Living Address: 513 Old Betsy Rd. City/State/Zip: Keene, TX 76059 JohnsonCounty: MSA: Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington, TX 1302703IRR Event ID: Sale Information Grantor: Local Owner/Operator Grantee: DFW Hospital Provider Sale Status: Closed 04/11/2016Date of Sale: $7,650,000Contract Sale Price: Document Type: Warranty Deed Assets Sold: Going concern, total assets of the business Property Rights: Fee Simple Going Concern % of Interest Conveyed: 100.00 Financing: Cash to seller Conditions of Sale: This was an arm's length transaction. Verified By: Carl Parker, III, MAI, PhD Verification Source: Matthew Alley Verification Type: Confirmed-Seller Broker Income Data Operating Data Type: In Place $2,416,673Effective Gross Income: Expenses: $1,764,387 Net Operating Income: $652,286 Expense Ratio: 73.01% Reserves Included: Yes Management Included: Yes Sale Indicators $86,932Price per Unit: Price per SF of GBA: $104.79 EGIM: 3.17 Cap Rate: 8.53% Site and Improvement Data Land-SF(Gross): 1,046,746 Independent Living, AL Dementia Care/Housing Types: Year Built: 1988 Property Condtion: Good Construction Quality: Average No. of Buildings/Stories: 15/2 GBA-SF: 73,000 No. of Units: 88 Unit Summary Care Type # Units # Beds Independent Living 56 AL Dementia 36 32 Total Units: 88 Total Units/Beds In Operation: 88 Chisholm Trail Estates Seniors Housing Sale Profile Comments Income and expense are based on actual operations at the time of sale. The property was 99% occupied at the time of sale. The buyer is owned by funds managed by an investment adviser. The expenses include management fee and $300 per unit for reserves. NOT READY FOR USE, AWAITING ADDITIONAL VERIFICATION. The facility has two main components: Lake Pointe at Chisholm Trail consists of the independent living apartments and The Gardens at Chisholm Trail is the Memory Care assisted living unit. The Villas are the attached IL duplex units that are single story. Built in 1988, the property was renovated in 2003. Project amenities include a pond stocked with bass and carports. Unit amenities include full kitchens, patios, washer/dryers in most units and individually controlled HVAC units. The site includes space for future development of additional duplex units. Chisholm Trail Estates Seniors Housing Sale Profile Location & Property Identification Property Name: Carriage Inn/Village on the Park Portfolio Sub-Property Type: Independent, Assisted & Dementia 750 Longmire Rd. Conroe, TX 77304 Montgomery Houston-The Woodlands-Sugar Land, TX 1361526 Harrison Street & Bridgewood Property Co. Cardinal Bay Closed 05/26/2016 $210,000,000 Warranty Deed Going concern, total assets of the business Fee Simple 100.00 Cash to seller This was an arm's length transaction. Brian L. Chandler, MAI, CRE, FRICS Confirmed-Confidential IRR Projection $37,942,770 $23,851,575 $14,091,195 62.86% Yes Address: City/State/Zip: County: MSA: IEvent ID: Sale Information Grantor: Grantee: Sale Status: Date of Sale: Contract Sale Price: Document Type: Assets Sold: Property Rights: % of Interest Conveyed: Financing: Conditions of Sale: Verified By: Verification Type: Income Data Operating Data Type: Effective Gross Income: Expenses: Net Operating Income: Expense Ratio: Reserves Included: Management Included: Yes Sale Indicators $202,507Price per Unit: Price per SF of GBA: $244.69 EGIM: 5.53 Cap Rate: 6.71% Site and Improvement Data Land-SF(Gross): 3,200,353 Independent Living, Assisted Living, AL Dementia Care/Housing Types: Year Built: 1989-2014 Property Condtion: Good Construction Quality: Good No. of Buildings/Stories: 8/1 GBA-SF: 858,229 No. of Units: 1037 Unit Summary Care Type # Units # Beds Independent Living 822 Assisted Living 154 AL Dementia 61 Total Units: 1,037 Total Units/Beds In Operation: 1,037 Carriage Inn/Village on the Park Portfolio Seniors Housing Sale Profile Comments The weighted average occupancy at the time of sale was 91.1%. The portfolio consists of 8 properties, 5 Carriage Inn facilities and 3 Village on the Park properties. Seven are located in Texas and one in Oklahoma. The Carriage Inn located at 750 Longmire Road in Conroe, Texas, built in 1998, is pictured. The other properties are: Village on the Park, 1515 Kingsridge Drive, Oklahoma City, built 1999; Carriage Inn, Bryan, 4325 Boonville Road, built 2000; Village on the Park, Friendswood, 400 East Parkwood Drive, built 1989; Village on the Park, Houston, 12102 Steepleway Blvd., built 1999; Carriage Inn, Huntsville, 2805 Lake Road, built 1998; Carriage Inn, Katy, 1400 Katy-Flewellen Road, built 1996/2014, and Carriage Inn, Lake Jackson, 130 Lake Road, built 1996. The Conroe and Friendswood properties are exclusively independent living, and the Oklahoma City, Houston, and Katy properties have a small amount of memory care. Carriage Inn/Village on the Park Portfolio Seniors Housing Sale Profile Location & Property Identification Legend at Tulsa Hills ALF/MC 701 West 71st Street South Tulsa, OK 74132 Tulsa Tulsa, OK Metropolitan Statistical Area TUL ALF2 LLC C/O Altus Group EPC Tulsa/Greeley LLC Closed Yes 6/23/2017 $27,210,000 Public Records 2017061160 Fee Simple Going Concern 100.00 All cash Andrea Roberts Confidential Pro Forma $5,160,421 $3,330,311 $1,830,110 64.5% Yes Yes Sale Indicators $316,395 Price per Unit: Price per SF of GBA: $341.18 EGIM: 5.27 Cap Rate: 6.73% Site and Improvement Data Land – SF (Gross): 163,786 ALF/MC Care/Housing Types: Year Built: 2014 Property Condition: Excellent Construction Quality: Excellent No. of Buildings/Stories: 1 & 2 GBA-SF: 79,752 No. of Units: 86 Unit Summary # Units 68 86 Care Type Assisted Living Memory Care Total Units/Beds In Operation: Comments Occupancy was approximately 94%. The pro forma and includes a 5% management fee and $300 per unit for reserves/replacements. The facility is licensed for 95 beds. The sale also included a 71 unit assisted living/ memory care facility in Greeley, Colorado, which is not included in the above purchase price. Property Name: Sub-Property Type: Address: City/State/Zip: County: MSA: Sale Information Grantor: Grantee: Sale Status: Portfolio Sale: Date of Sale: Contract Sale Price: Document Type: Recording No.: Property Rights: % of Interest Conveyed: Financing: Verified By: Verification Type: Income Data Operating Data Type: Effective Gross Income: Expenses: Net Operating Income: Expense Ratio: Reserves Included: Management Included: Legend at Tulsa Hills 18                                                                                                                                                                                                                     Appendix D Operating Data Page: 1 of 16Brookdale Senior Living 12.00 Income Statement TB_RESTRUCT: 52360-BKD Castle Hills AL_MC (TX) Run: Feb 19, 2018 at 16:27 BSL0001_2012-2017 BY MONTH W2018 FINAL 2016 2017 2018 FINAL Capacity Assisted Living 80.0 80.0 80.0 Memory Care 17.0 17.0 17.0 Total Unit Capacity 97.0 97.0 97.0 Unit Occupancy Assisted Living 47.8 50.5 51.6 Memory Care 14.4 15.8 14.5 IL / AL / MC Occupancy 62.2 66.4 66.1 Total Unit Occupancy 62.2 66.4 66.1 Occupancy % Assisted Living 59.76% 63.17% 64.51% Memory Care 84.65% 93.17% 85.17% Total Occupancy % 64.12% 68.43% 68.13% Rates per occupied unit, except as noted: Assisted Living 3,224 3,007 2,798 Memory Care 5,380 4,591 4,350 Total Base Rent 3,723 3,385 3,138 Assisted Living (537) (422) (334) Memory Care (281) (169) (131) Total Permanent Discounts (478) (362) (290) Assisted Living 2,686 2,585 2,464 Memory Care 5,099 4,422 4,219 Total Base Rent Less Permanent Discounts 3,245 3,023 2,848 Assisted Living (119) (52) (69) Memory Care (136) (42) (176) Total Incentives (123) (50) (93) Assisted Living 2,567 2,533 2,394 Memory Care 4,963 4,380 4,043 Total Base Rent Less Perm Discounts and Incentives 3,121 2,974 2,755 Assisted Living 448 492 541 Memory Care 643 1,088 849 Total Care Revenue (per AL & MC occupied unit) 493 635 608 Assisted Living 3,015 3,025 2,935 Memory Care 5,605 5,468 4,892 Total Base Rent & Care less Perm Discounts and Incentives 3,614 3,608 3,364 IL/AL/MC Other Revenue per Unit 56 40 46 Base Rent Less Cash Discounts (all products) 3,121 2,974 11,022 Base Rent & Care Less Cash Discount (all products) 3,614 3,608 13,455 Page: 2 of 16Brookdale Senior Living 12.00 Income Statement TB_RESTRUCT: 52360-BKD Castle Hills AL_MC (TX) Run: Feb 19, 2018 at 16:27 BSL0001_2012-2017 BY MONTH W2018 FINAL 2016 2017 2018 FINAL Resident Revenue 400200 Double Occupancy Revenue 0 0 0 400200 Double Occupancy Revenue 12,852 18,108 10,104 400300 Service Fee Rent Revenue 1,830,619 1,802,655 1,722,793 400650 Contra: Rent Revenue - BB (317) 2,607 0 450000 Respite Revenue 6,450 0 0 Rent - Assisted 1,849,604 1,823,370 1,732,897 400200 Double Occupancy Revenue 98 1,295 0 400300 Service Fee Rent Revenue 925,195 869,610 755,791 400650 Contra: Rent Revenue - BB (58) 1,803 0 450000 Respite Revenue 3,850 0 0 Rent - Memory Care 929,085 872,708 755,791 400650 Contra: Rent Revenue - BB 0 0 0 Resident Rent Revenue 2,778,690 2,696,079 2,488,688 Care Revenue 455000 Care Revenue 367,846 505,436 482,459 PVT Care Revenue 367,846 505,436 482,459 Care Revenue 367,846 505,436 482,459 Discounts 460000 Long-Term Incentives (46,140) (17,947) (41,498) 460001 Short-Term Incentives (45,665) (21,525) (32,023) 460002 Permanent Discounts (306,167) (236,178) (183,361) 460005 Travel & Save Incentive 0 0 0 460006 Flexible Mod Plan Incentive 0 0 0 460007 Resident Tenure Discount (343) 0 0 460014 Resident Retention Discount (50,731) (51,923) (46,558) Rent Concessions (449,045) (327,572) (303,439) 460003 S-T Incentives Amortization (31,687) (37,195) (27,466) 460004 S-T Incentives Deferral 45,665 21,525 32,023 Conc-Deferral-Amort-MyChoice 13,977 (15,670) 4,557 Discounts (435,067) (343,243) (298,882) Community Fees 402802 Community Fees - BB 3,350 0 0 Community Fees - BB 3,350 0 0 402800 Admission / Community Fees 90,734 40,250 50,834 498000 Comm Fee Waived (42,873) (10,325) 0 Community Fee Revenue 47,861 29,925 50,834 Community Fees 51,211 29,925 50,834 Food Revenue 473300 Catering Revenue 0 0 0 Catering Revenue 0 0 0 473000 Meal Revenue - Resident 210 0 210 473100 Meal Revenue - Tray Delivery 4,064 2,040 1,881 473400 Meal Revenue - Guest 1,030 1,676 1,087 Meal Revenue 5,304 3,716 3,178 Food Revenue 5,304 3,716 3,178 Other Resident Revenue 475000 Department Revenue 22,722 17,204 21,797 Department Revenue 22,722 17,204 21,797 475200 Sublease Revenue 0 0 0 Sublease Revenue 0 0 0 476500 Personal Solutions Revenue 5,785 1,860 2,780 Personal Solutions Revenue 5,785 1,860 2,780 475700 Miscellaneous Revenue 3,805 7,412 6,057 476300 Room Revenue - Guest 0 309 309 Other Misc Revenue 3,805 7,721 6,366 476100 Incontinence Rev-Non Prsnl Sol 0 0 0 Non-PS Incontenance 0 0 0 475210 ISC Rent Revenue 0 0 0 476400 HH_Hospice-Other Revenue 0 0 0 ISC Rent/HH Hospice 0 0 0 Other Resident Revenue 32,312 26,785 30,944 Late Fee Revenue 475500 Late Fee Revenue 12,500 5,000 6,750 475550 Late Fee Rev Contra 1,485 (500) 0 475600 Late Fee Revenue Write-off (9,500) (3,500) (4,750) Late Fee Revenue 4,485 1,000 2,000 Late Fee Revenue 4,485 1,000 2,000 Total Resident Revenue 2,804,781 2,919,697 2,759,221 Compensation Expenses Regular 500000 Salaries & Wages Exempt 252,734 168,463 180,471 Salaries and Wages - Exempt 252,734 168,463 180,471 501000 Salaries & Wages Nonexempt 197,953 292,922 328,882 501150 Cook Wages 95,037 95,951 95,653 501200 Utility Workers Wages 0 0 0 501350 Housekeeper Wages 37,954 36,610 38,719 501510 Res Care Coordinator Wages 0 83 0 501520 Res Care Associate Wages 281,291 293,351 313,920 501550 Drivers Wages 15,950 13,574 9,889 501600 Concierge Wages 26,375 23,557 25,516 501800 Registered Nurses (RN's) 10,408 4,655 6,724 501900 Certified Nursing Aides (CNAs) 0 25 0 501903 Med Aide 233,887 261,806 284,376 Salaries and Wages-Non Exempt 898,854 1,022,534 1,103,679 501750 Personalized Living Wages 0 0 0 Personalized Living Wages 0 0 0 502400 On Call Pay 1,600 1,210 0 On Call Pay 1,600 1,210 0 505010 Transitional Duty Wages 1,958 2,079 0 Transitional Duty Wages 1,958 2,079 0 505200 Salaries - Other 23,373 30,999 25,710 Salaries - TRN, Bylr,Ber 23,373 30,999 25,710 505800 G&A Alloc- Sales Specialists 252 705 0 G&A Alloc - Sales Specialists 252 705 0 505760 Non-Recurring Expense Labor 0 0 0 Non-Recurring Expense Labor 0 0 0 Regular 1,178,771 1,225,991 1,309,860 Overtime Page: 3 of 16Brookdale Senior Living 12.00 Income Statement TB_RESTRUCT: 52360-BKD Castle Hills AL_MC (TX) Run: Feb 19, 2018 at 16:27 BSL0001_2012-2017 BY MONTH W2018 FINAL 2016 2017 2018 FINAL 502000 Salaries & Wages-OT Nonexempt 82,031 87,930 89,905 Overtime 82,031 87,930 89,905 Overtime 82,031 87,930 89,905 Bonus 506500 Bonus - Employee Referral 1,485 1,032 1,248 506800 Bonus - Signing 0 7 0 506900 Bonus - Other Recognition 0 0 0 506909 General Bonuses 8,240 10,687 11,762 507100 Sales & Marketing Bonus 0 0 0 General Bonuses 9,725 11,726 13,010 506600 Resident Referral Bonus 0 0 0 Resident Referral Bonus 0 0 0 507300 CMIP Bonus 7,257 4,061 23,136 507330 CMIP Bonus Protem 1,649 742 0 CMIP Bonus 8,906 4,803 23,136 Bonus 18,632 16,529 36,146 Commissions 507500 Commissions Wages 12,612 6,515 13,447 Commissions Wages 12,612 6,515 13,447 Commissions 12,612 6,515 13,447 Contract Labor 516009 Contract Community 0 0 0 Contract Community 0 0 0 PTO & Holiday Wages 523300 Holiday 29,665 30,875 32,964 523600 PTO Wages 50,576 45,212 47,855 PTO & Holiday 80,241 76,088 80,819 PTO & Holiday Wages 80,241 76,088 80,819 Payroll Taxes 515000 Payroll Taxes 121,161 122,367 133,091 Payroll Taxes 121,161 122,367 133,091 Payroll Taxes 121,161 122,367 133,091 Employee Benefits 521900 Life and ADD Insurance 1,500 1,518 2,125 522500 Disability Insurance 163 167 230 523100 Employee Benefits - Misc. 0 0 2,298 523200 401(K) Savings Plan 6,339 8,447 11,882 524300 Bereavement Pay 1,884 1,364 0 524500 Severance Pay 0 0 0 524800 Long Term Bank 2,196 7 0 Employee Benefits Paid 12,081 11,503 16,535 520100 Group Health Insurance 77,106 117,715 135,114 Group Health Insurance 77,106 117,715 135,114 524900 Relocation Costs - Other 0 1 0 Relocation Costs - Other 0 1 0 Employee Benefits 89,187 129,219 151,649 Workers Compensation 524700 Workers Comp Premium 1,351 1,393 1,890 524710 Workers Comp-Claim Costs 13,141 11,664 12,072 524720 Workers Comp - TPA Cost 3,007 1,876 3,622 524740 Workers Comp PY Reserve Adj (6,683) (4,979) 0 Workers Comp Totals 10,815 9,955 17,583 Workers Compensation 10,815 9,955 17,583 501520 Res Care Associate Wages 0 0 0 501750 Personalized Living Wages 0 0 0 507300 CMIP Bonus 0 0 0 515000 Payroll Taxes 0 0 0 500000 Salaries & Wages Exempt 0 0 0 501000 Salaries & Wages Nonexempt 0 0 0 501904 Rehab Aide 0 0 0 501905 ISC Business Office Wages 0 0 0 502000 Salaries & Wages-OT Nonexempt 0 0 0 504920 Physical Therapy Wages 0 0 0 504925 PRN Physical Therapy Wages 0 0 0 504930 Occupational Therapy Wages 0 0 0 504940 Speech Therapy Wages 0 0 0 504950 FIT/Premium Wages 0 0 0 515000 Payroll Taxes 0 0 0 523300 Holiday 0 0 0 523600 PTO Wages 0 0 0 Total Compensation Expenses 1,593,450 1,674,595 1,832,501 Other Controllable Expenses Food Expenses 530000 Raw Food 0 0 0 530001 Food Target Adjustments 0 0 (4,043) 530009 Raw Food 145,655 150,223 154,311 530100 Bakery 0 0 0 530200 Dairy 0 0 0 530300 Produce 0 0 0 530400 Meat & Seafood 0 0 0 530500 Groceries 0 0 0 531100 Special Event Meals 0 0 0 531200 Associate Meal Xfer-DS UseOnly 0 0 0 531500 Transfers 0 0 0 540502 Dietary Supplements, Dining 0 0 0 540660 Liquid Nutritional Supplements 0 0 0 Raw Food 145,655 150,223 150,268 531109 Food Adjustments (217) 133 23 531300 Food Rebate (13,172) (8,624) (8,104) 531301 Food Rebate Target Adj 0 0 0 550300 Res Special Events & Actv-Food 103 0 0 600700 Spcl Event-Prosp-Infl-Food 23 0 0 650100 Associate Meals 0 0 0 Food Adjustments (13,264) (8,491) (8,081) 771300 Fuel Surcharge 0 0 0 Fuel Surcharge 0 0 0 530800 Convenience Store Merchandise 0 0 0 Convenience Store Merchandise 0 0 0 Food Expenses 132,391 141,733 142,187 Supplies 540000 Kitchen and dietary Supplies 0 0 0 540009 Dietary Supplies 1,355 3,408 4,536 Page: 4 of 16Brookdale Senior Living 12.00 Income Statement TB_RESTRUCT: 52360-BKD Castle Hills AL_MC (TX) Run: Feb 19, 2018 at 16:27 BSL0001_2012-2017 BY MONTH W2018 FINAL 2016 2017 2018 FINAL 543000 Dishes & Utensils 0 0 0 545300 OneSource Sysco Reclass 0 0 0 Dietary Supplies 1,355 3,408 4,536 540500 General Supplies 0 0 0 540501 Supplies Target Adjustment 0 0 (239) 540509 General Supplies 24,411 25,560 25,392 541000 Office Supplies 0 0 0 541500 Paper & Forms 497 20 0 542000 Paper Goods 0 0 0 542500 Linens 0 0 0 543500 Uniforms 0 0 0 General Supplies 24,908 25,580 25,153 544000 Chemicals 0 0 0 544700 Housekeeping Supplies 0 0 0 544709 Cleaning Supplies 12,905 14,884 16,452 Cleaning Supplies 12,905 14,884 16,452 544050 Beauty Supplies & Expenses 16,517 12,467 16,284 Beauty Supplies & Expenses 16,517 12,467 16,284 544900 Postage and Courier Delivery 2,990 2,998 2,448 Postage and Courier Delivery 2,990 2,998 2,448 545000 Supplies Small & Non-Capital 5,107 2,287 3,240 Supplies Small & Non-Capital 5,107 2,287 3,240 540510 Durable Medical Equipment 420 46 300 Durable Medical Equipment 420 46 300 540615 Personal Solutions_PCP 3,951 1,199 1,971 Incontinent Supp-Personal Solu 3,951 1,199 1,971 Supplies 68,153 62,868 70,383 Healthcare Supplies 540601 Medical Supplies 0 4 0 540609 Medical Supplies 4,434 756 611 540620 Incontinent Supplies 0 0 0 540671 OTC Pharmacy 0 2 0 Medical Supplies 4,434 762 611 540650 Clinical Charting 0 0 0 540659 Other Healthcare Expenses 1,908 1,545 2,249 540670 Pharmacy MedA and Managed Care 0 34 0 543600 Hazardous Medical Waste 21 0 0 Other Healthcare Expenses 1,929 1,579 2,249 Healthcare Supplies 6,363 2,341 2,860 Resident Activities 550100 Flowers 0 0 0 550109 Resident Relations 1,192 1,272 1,032 550200 Newsletter 0 0 0 550400 Resident Relations 9 0 0 Resident Relations 1,201 1,272 1,032 550305 Res Special Events - Other 0 0 0 550500 Resident Activities-Other 5 5 0 550509 Resident Activities 8,617 12,560 11,053 Resident Activities 8,622 12,565 11,053 550510 Interactive Technology Expense 3,388 3,388 3,468 Interactive Technology Expense 3,388 3,388 3,468 Resident Activities 13,211 17,225 15,553 Travel & Entertainment 555400 Other Ground Transport 0 0 0 555409 Vehicle Transport and Rental 997 496 276 555450 Car Rental 0 0 0 555700 Mileage Expense 35 0 0 Vehicle Transport and Rental 1,032 496 276 555000 Lodging 401 1,968 2,598 Lodging 401 1,968 2,598 555200 Airfare 889 12 480 Airfare 889 12 480 555900 Meals & Entertainment 504 127 120 557100 Prospect Meals & Entertainment 0 0 0 Meals & Entertainment 504 127 120 Travel & Entertainment 2,827 2,603 3,474 Repairs & Maintenance 560100 Heating, Plumbing & Electrical 0 0 0 560109 Heatng,Plumbing,Electric,Water 35,134 33,564 40,200 560110 Electrician Repair Service 0 0 0 560120 Plumbing Repair Service 0 0 0 560130 Water Treatment 0 0 0 560150 JLL FM HVAC Maint & Repair 14,629 2,974 0 561700 Misc Maintenance Contracts 0 0 0 Heat, Plumbg, Electrical,Water 49,763 36,538 40,200 560600 Maintenance Supplies 0 0 0 560609 R&M Building_Equip_Supp 42,173 35,586 40,152 560700 Residence Decorating 0 0 0 560800 R & M - Building 0 0 0 560900 R & M - Equipment 0 0 0 R&MBuilding/Equipment/Supplies 42,173 35,586 40,152 560500 Vehicle Upkeep and Maintenance 0 0 0 561400 Community Vehicle Gas Expense 0 0 0 561409 Vehicle Upkeep 7,260 6,420 1,872 Vehicle Upkeep 7,260 6,420 1,872 561709 IT Hardware and Maintenance 576 714 588 IT Hardware and Maintenance 576 714 588 560200 Fire Safety and Security 0 0 0 570900 Alarm System Contract 0 0 0 570909 Fire, Safety, and Security 135 15,716 27,168 570950 JLL FM Fire, Safety & Security 25,382 7,735 0 Fire, Safety, and Security 25,517 23,451 27,168 Repairs & Maintenance 125,288 102,709 109,980 Ground Maint & Contract Svcs 569000 Grounds Maintenance 0 0 0 569009 Outside Grounds Contracts 1,308 20,158 33,136 569050 JLL FM Landscpng & Grnds Maint 51,767 17,788 0 Outside Grounds Contracts 53,076 37,947 33,136 570109 Inside Cleaning Contracts 0 0 0 570200 Carpet Cleaning Contract 0 0 0 571150 Common Area Maint Contracts 0 0 0 Inside Cleaning Contracts 0 0 0 570600 HVAC Contract 0 0 0 Page: 5 of 16Brookdale Senior Living 12.00 Income Statement TB_RESTRUCT: 52360-BKD Castle Hills AL_MC (TX) Run: Feb 19, 2018 at 16:27 BSL0001_2012-2017 BY MONTH W2018 FINAL 2016 2017 2018 FINAL 570609 Equipment Service Contracts 869 896 768 571100 Generator Maintenance 0 0 0 571110 Laundry Equipment Service 0 0 0 571120 Kitchen Equipment Service 113 0 0 Equipment Service Contracts 981 896 768 571139 Rental Contracts 0 0 0 Rental Contracts 0 0 0 570050 JLL FM Program Fees 4,219 5,628 0 Outside Dept Labor Contracts 4,219 5,628 0 570700 Elevator Contract 0 2,935 9,912 570750 JLL FM Elevator Maint & Repair 5,031 6,433 0 Elevator Contract 5,031 9,368 9,912 570500 Pest Control Contract 0 2,137 6,348 570550 JLL FM Pest Control 5,984 1,617 0 Pest Control Contract 5,984 3,754 6,348 561000 Environmental Expense 0 0 0 Environmental Expense 0 0 0 Ground Maint & Contract Svcs 69,292 57,593 50,164 Communication & Telephone 580209 Telephone 17,321 18,096 18,192 580900 Telephone 0 0 0 581100 Cellular Phone Charges 0 0 0 Telephone 17,321 18,096 18,192 580700 Internet 0 0 0 580709 Internet_Connected Living 1,646 1,629 1,668 Internet / Connected Living 1,646 1,629 1,668 581400 Cable & Satellite TV 5,742 11,075 11,328 Cable & Satellite TV 5,742 11,075 11,328 Communication & Telephone 24,708 30,800 31,188 Paid Referrals 601909 Friends for Life Referral Fees 2,013 3,630 5,124 Friends For Life 2,013 3,630 5,124 601600 Referral Mktg-Community 0 0 0 601730 Intrnet LeadAggregtr-Fee-Mv-In 0 0 0 601739 Paid Referrals 50,900 18,000 46,498 601740 Intrnet LeadAggregtr-Other 0 0 0 Paid_Referrals 50,900 18,000 46,498 Paid Referrals 52,913 21,630 51,622 Public Relations & Advertising 600100 DM-Lead Bank Prosp-Adult Infl 0 0 0 600110 DM-Purch List Prosp-Adult Infl 380 0 0 600120 Direct Mail (Corp Use Only) 0 40 7,034 600210 Advertising - Corporate Print 0 3,903 2,547 600300 Adver-Local TV (Corp Use Only) 0 0 0 600510 Multi-layer Mktg Hm of Plcmt 10,992 0 0 600805 Call Center Lead Nurturing 0 0 0 601719 Advertising Digital 5,040 14,349 9,744 601720 Advert-Social Media (Corp Use) 0 1,422 4,410 Corporate Marketing 16,412 19,714 23,736 600109 Direct Mail (Comm Use Only) 5,244 3,903 2,400 600200 Newspaper Run o Press Adv-Zone 0 0 0 600209 Advertising - Local Print 0 0 3,000 600220 Senior Publication Adv 0 0 0 600230 Magazines-Programs-Other Adv 0 0 0 600309 Advertising - Local Broadcast 0 40 0 600600 Collatrl Matls - Prospct-Infl 1,553 807 750 600610 Collatrl Matls - Professionals 0 0 0 600705 Spcl Event-Prosp-Infl-Other 0 0 0 600709 Special Events 339 770 1,544 600710 Spcl Event-M3-M2 Shared Mkt 0 0 0 600800 Mktg Membrshp-Shows-Model 0 0 0 600809 Other Marketing 3,371 4,487 791 600810 Mktg Cust-Comp Intelligence 0 0 0 600830 Move-In Gift-New Residnt-Cust 0 0 0 600840 Promotional Items 0 0 0 600850 Personal Connections 0 0 0 601605 Local Business Development 0 0 0 601609 Business Development 50 277 2,265 601800 Public Relation Fees 0 0 0 Community Marketing 10,556 10,285 10,750 Public Relations & Advertising 26,968 29,999 34,485 Staff Development 650000 Associate Appreciation 12 0 0 650009 Assoc Appreciation_Incentives 1,955 1,084 1,548 Associate Appreciatin/Incentiv 1,967 1,084 1,548 651500 Staff Training 740 0 0 651509 Staff Training Expenses 629 882 1,176 655500 Seminars & Training 0 0 0 Staff Training 1,368 882 1,176 654500 Pre Employment Expense (292) 0 0 654509 Pre-Employment Expenses 13,973 12,285 13,488 Pre-Employment Expenses 13,681 12,285 13,488 Staff Development 17,016 14,251 16,212 Professional Fees 516109 Consultants & Med Directors 0 0 0 710800 Consulting Fees 0 0 0 Consultants/Medical Director 0 0 0 700100 Collections Legal Fees 180 0 0 700109 Legal Fees 0 0 180 700400 Corporate SEC Legal Fees 0 0 0 700900 Operations Regulatory Lgl Fees 144 0 0 Legal Fees 324 0 180 710400 Other Professional Fees 3,578 0 0 710409 Other Professional Fees 3,535 3,266 4,251 Other Professional Fees 7,113 3,266 4,251 710100 Pharmacy Fees 315 934 528 Pharmacy Fees 315 934 528 Professional Fees 7,753 4,201 4,959 Bad Debt Expense 750000 Bad Debt Expense 20,643 9,434 17,888 Bad Debt Expense 20,643 9,434 17,888 Bad Debt Expense 20,643 9,434 17,888 Other Misc. Operating Expenses Page: 6 of 16Brookdale Senior Living 12.00 Income Statement TB_RESTRUCT: 52360-BKD Castle Hills AL_MC (TX) Run: Feb 19, 2018 at 16:27 BSL0001_2012-2017 BY MONTH W2018 FINAL 2016 2017 2018 FINAL 771200 Miscellaneous 130 0 0 771209 Misc Expenses and Misc Taxes 1,896 543 636 Misc. Taxes and Expenses 2,026 543 636 774809 Printing Expenses Allocated 0 0 0 774900 Employee Handbook Printing 14 0 0 Printing Expenses Allocated 14 0 0 770300 Association Fees 2,134 2,426 2,484 Association Fees 2,134 2,426 2,484 770400 Survey & License Fees 1,296 3,116 3,379 Survey & License Fees 1,296 3,116 3,379 770800 Bank Charges 6 0 0 Bank Charges 6 0 0 771100 Dues and Subscriptions 1,323 881 858 Dues and Subscriptions 1,323 881 858 771600 Sales and Use Tax 191 6 154 Sales and Use Tax 191 6 154 771901 License & Annual Reports 0 0 0 License & Annual Reports 0 0 0 777100 Contra Expense - Rebates (9,386) (4,671) (2,817) 777101 Non-Food Rebate Target Adj 0 0 0 Contra Expense - Rebates (9,386) (4,671) (2,817) 771220 Uncoded P-Card 0 110 0 771900 Uncoded AP Invoices 328 (202) 0 Uncoded Expenses 328 (92) 0 Other Misc. Operating Expenses (2,068) 2,208 4,694 655500 Seminars & Training 0 0 0 Total Other Controllable Expenses 565,458 499,593 555,650 Non-Controllable Expenses Utilities 760000 Electricity 86,576 94,345 95,260 Electricity 86,576 94,345 95,260 761000 Gas 6,827 6,350 6,291 Gas 6,827 6,350 6,291 763000 Water and Sewer 44,469 54,653 46,517 Water and Sewer 44,469 54,653 46,517 765000 Waste (22) 4,846 6,564 765050 JLL FM Waste Management 7,294 1,567 0 Waste 7,272 6,413 6,564 766000 Utility Admin Expense 431 425 409 Utility Admin Expense 431 425 409 Utilities 145,575 162,186 155,041 Vehicle & Equipment Lease 550900 Vehicle Lease 11,597 11,403 11,568 Vehicle Lease 11,597 11,403 11,568 550910 Kitchen Equipment Rental 6,519 7,529 7,572 561600 Offce Equip & Furniture Rental 16,221 15,567 12,492 Office/Furniture/Kitchenrental 22,739 23,096 20,064 Vehicle & Equipment Lease 34,337 34,499 31,632 Insurance Expenses 850000 Insurance - Gen Liability Prem 8,812 8,748 9,081 850100 Insurance-Gen Liab Claim Costs 23,720 24,635 26,010 850120 GLPL Prior Year Reserve Adj 29,362 3,383 0 Insurance - Gen Liability 61,894 36,765 35,091 850600 Insurance - Property Premium 6,058 6,184 7,563 850610 Insurance - Property Claims 7,904 5,088 3,818 Insurance - Property 13,961 11,272 11,381 850700 Insurance - Auto 2,713 1,330 1,311 850710 Auto Claims-Reserve 2,983 1,305 1,530 Insurance - Auto 5,696 2,636 2,840 851700 Insurance - Other 405 508 1,050 Insurance - Other 405 508 1,050 Insurance Expenses 81,956 51,180 50,363 Real Estate Taxes 880000 Real Estate Tax Expense 211,038 217,902 222,260 880100 Real Estate Tax - Prof Serv 12,202 10,950 250 Real Estate 223,239 228,852 222,510 880010 PY Appeal Refunds (12,837) (52,760) 0 880020 PY Tax Adjustments 0 0 0 Prior Year Refunds&Adjustments (12,837) (52,760) 0 880300 Personal Property Taxes 11,649 11,539 12,362 Personal Property Taxes 11,649 11,539 12,362 Real Estate Taxes 222,051 187,631 234,872 Support Services 772400 G&A Expense Allocatio 0 0 0 772401 PC Fees-Allocation 6,744 17,999 24,606 772402 PC Fees SNF-Allocation 0 0 0 772403 Software License Fees-Allocati 0 0 0 772404 Creative Services-Allocation 2,262 2,999 3,236 772406 Digital Marketing-Allocation 1,139 1,456 2,679 772407 Assoc Engagement Survey-Alloca 500 64 132 772408 Cust Engagement Survey-Allocat 418 564 865 772414 Regional Maint Techs-Allocatio 3,048 1,788 4,278 772417 Contact Center Allocation 0 0 0 772510 G&A Alloc - PS 239 463 693 Support Services 14,349 25,334 36,489 Support Services 14,349 25,334 36,489 Total Non-Controllable Expenses 498,267 460,830 508,396 OPERATING EXPENSES 2,657,175 2,635,018 2,896,546 Page: 7 of 16Brookdale Senior Living 12.00 Income Statement TB_RESTRUCT: 52360-BKD Castle Hills AL_MC (TX) Run: Feb 19, 2018 at 16:27 BSL0001_2012-2017 BY MONTH W2018 FINAL 2016 2017 2018 FINAL NET OPERATING INCOME (LOSS) 147,606 284,679 (137,325) OPERATING MARGIN 5.26% 9.75% (4.98%) Entrance Fee Amortization Gain on Terminations 0 0 0 Entrance Fee Amortization 0 0 0 Entrance Fee Amortization 0 0 0 NET OPERATING INCOME (LOSS) W/EF AMORT 147,606 284,679 (137,325) 2,016 2,017 BUDGET Page: 8 of 16Brookdale Senior Living 12.00 Income Statement TB_RESTRUCT: 52360-BKD Castle Hills AL_MC (TX) Run: Feb 19, 2018 at 16:27 BSL0001_2012-2017 BY MONTH W2018 FINAL 2016 2017 2018 FINAL Page: 1 of 7Run: Jun 12, 2018 at 13:42 By: EHILLARD BSL0030_OR March April May 3 Month Total Capacity Independent Living - - - - Independent Villas - - - - Assisted Living 80.0 80.0 80.0 20.0 Memory Care 17.0 17.0 17.0 4.3 Skilled Nursing - - - - No Product - - - - Total Unit Capacity 97.0 97.0 97.0 24.3 Unit Occupancy Independent Living - - - - Independent Villas - - - - Assisted Living 48.8 52.0 52.8 153.6 Memory Care 15.8 14.9 15.2 45.9 No Product - - - - IL / AL / MC Occupancy 64.6 66.9 68.0 Skilled - Private - - - - Skilled - Medicare - - - - Skilled - Medicaid - - - - Skilled - Insurance / HMO - - - - Skilled - Other Payers - - - - Skilled Occupancy - - - - Total Unit Occupancy 64.6 66.9 68.0 - Occupancy % Independent Living 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Independent Villas 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Assisted Living 61.01% 65.04% 65.97% 768.07% Memory Care 93.17% 87.65% 89.28% 1080.38% Skilled Nursing 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% No Product 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Total Occupancy % 66.64% 69.00% 70.05% 68.57% Page: 2 of 7Run: Jun 12, 2018 at 13:42 By: EHILLARD BSL0030_OR March April May 3 Month Total Resident Revenue Rent - Independent - - - - Rent - IL Villas - - - - 400200 Double Occupancy Revenue 3,308 3,308 3,308 9,924 400300 Service Fee Rent Revenue 135,987 144,403 146,561 426,951 400650 Contra: Rent Revenue - BB 0 0 (2) (2) Rent - Assisted 139,295 147,711 149,868 436,873 400200 Double Occupancy Revenue 1,000 1,000 1,000 3,000 400300 Service Fee Rent Revenue 64,806 61,438 61,705 187,949 400650 Contra: Rent Revenue - BB 0 0 0 0 Rent - Memory Care 65,806 62,438 62,705 190,949 Rent - Skilled (R&B) - - - 0 Rent - Equity Homes - - - 0 Rent - No Product - - - 0 Resident Rent Revenue 205,101 210,148 212,573 627,8220 Care Revenue 0 455000 Care Revenue 47,423 50,340 49,796 147,559 PVT Care Revenue 47,423 50,340 49,796 147,559 Care Revenue 47,423 50,340 49,796 147,559 Discounts 0 460000 Long-Term Incentives (6,185) (8,185) (8,685) (23,055) 460001 Short-Term Incentives 0 (1,000) (3,000) (4,000) 460002 Permanent Discounts (12,474) (12,474) (12,408) (37,356) 460014 Resident Retention Discount (3,128) (3,169) (3,378) (9,675) Rent Concessions (21,787) (24,828) (27,471) (74,086) 460003 S-T Incentives Amortization (1,500) (1,583) (1,662) (4,745) 460004 S-T Incentives Deferral 0 1,000 3,000 4,000 Conc-Deferral-Amort-MyChoice (1,500) (583) 1,338 (745) Discounts (23,287) (25,411) (26,133) (74,831) Community Fees 0 402802 Community Fees - BB 0 0 3,750 3,750 Community Fees - BB 0 0 3,750 3,750 402800 Admission / Community Fees 5,250 3,750 0 9,000 498000 Comm Fee Waived 0 0 (875) (875) Community Fee Revenue 5,250 3,750 (875) 8,125 Community Fees 5,250 3,750 2,875 11,875 0 Food Revenue 0 473100 Meal Revenue - Tray Delivery 0 160 0 160 473400 Meal Revenue - Guest 0 24 12 36 Meal Revenue 0 184 12 196 Food Revenue 0 184 12 196 0 Other Resident Revenue 0 475000 Department Revenue 156 2,956 1,644 4,756 Department Revenue 156 2,956 1,644 4,756 476500 Personal Solutions Revenue 0 16 0 16 Personal Solutions Revenue 0 16 0 16 475700 Miscellaneous Revenue 662 853 1,560 3,075 476300 Room Revenue - Guest 0 0 436 436 Other Misc Revenue 662 853 1,996 3,511 Other Resident Revenue 818 3,824 3,640 8,283 Late Fee Revenue 0 475500 Late Fee Revenue 500 500 (500) 500 475550 Late Fee Rev Contra 0 0 250 250 475600 Late Fee Revenue Write-off (250) 0 0 (250) Late Fee Revenue 250 500 (250) 500 Late Fee Revenue 250 500 (250) 500 Lifecare Utilization & HC Benefit 0 0 Personalized Living Revenue - - - 0 Skilled Therapy Revenue - - - 0 Total Resident Revenue 235,555 243,336 242,513 721,404 0 Compensation Expense 0 Regular 0 500000 Salaries & Wages Exempt 15,966 15,750 18,476 50,192 Salaries and Wages - Exempt 15,966 15,750 18,476 50,192 501000 Salaries & Wages Nonexempt 25,934 25,884 26,503 78,321 501150 Cook Wages 7,506 7,722 7,756 22,984 501200 Utility Workers Wages 0 0 0 0 501350 Housekeeper Wages 2,696 2,908 2,585 8,189 501520 Res Care Associate Wages 23,336 19,794 24,504 67,633 501550 Drivers Wages 1,176 1,116 776 3,068 501600 Concierge Wages 1,846 1,880 1,654 5,380 501800 Registered Nurses (RN's) 0 0 0 0 501900 Certified Nursing Aides (CNAs) 260 343 285 888 501903 Med Aide 19,377 21,864 20,214 61,455 Salaries and Wages-Non Exempt 82,130 81,511 84,277 247,918 502400 On Call Pay 150 90 175 415 On Call Pay 150 90 175 415 505010 Transitional Duty Wages 254 158 180 592 Transitional Duty Wages 254 158 180 592 505200 Salaries - Other 1,055 3,615 5,390 10,060 Salaries - TRN, Bylr,Ber 1,055 3,615 5,390 10,060 505800 G&A Alloc- Sales Specialists 0 0 0 0 G&A Alloc - Sales Specialists 0 0 0 0 Regular 99,554 101,124 108,498 309,176 Overtime 0 502000 Salaries & Wages-OT Nonexempt 7,831 5,969 5,475 19,275 Overtime 7,831 5,969 5,475 19,275 Overtime 7,831 5,969 5,475 19,275 Bonus 0 506500 Bonus - Employee Referral 116 239 166 520 506800 Bonus - Signing 0 0 0 0 506909 General Bonuses 35 35 316 386 General Bonuses 151 274 482 906 Page: 3 of 7Run: Jun 12, 2018 at 13:42 By: EHILLARD BSL0030_OR March April May 3 Month Total 507300 CMIP Bonus 1,928 1,928 1,928 5,784 507330 CMIP Bonus Protem 3 489 8 500 CMIP Bonus 1,931 2,417 1,936 6,284 Bonus 2,082 2,691 2,418 7,190 Commissions 0 507500 Commissions Wages 700 1,950 750 3,400 Commissions Wages 700 1,950 750 3,400 Commissions 700 1,950 750 3,400 0 PTO & Holiday Wages 0 523300 Holiday 0 0 5,454 5,454 523600 PTO Wages 4,488 3,403 3,466 11,356 PTO & Holiday 4,488 3,403 8,920 16,810 PTO & Holiday Wages 4,488 3,403 8,920 16,810 501750 Personalized Living Wages 0 0 0 0 515000 Payroll Taxes 0 0 0 0 Personalized Living Compensation - - - 0 Skilled Therapy Compensation - - - 0 Payroll Taxes 0 515000 Payroll Taxes 10,310 10,071 10,551 30,932 Payroll Taxes 10,310 10,071 10,551 30,932 Payroll Taxes 10,310 10,071 10,551 30,932 Employee Benefits 0 521900 Life and ADD Insurance 130 129 119 379 522500 Disability Insurance 27 32 27 86 523200 401(K) Savings Plan (649) 1,043 (178) 216 524300 Bereavement Pay 164 8 234 406 524800 Long Term Bank 0 0 0 0 Employee Benefits Paid (328) 1,212 202 1,086 520100 Group Health Insurance 10,803 10,599 10,041 31,443 Group Health Insurance 10,803 10,599 10,041 31,443 Employee Benefits 10,475 11,811 10,243 32,529 Workers Compensation 0 524700 Workers Comp Premium 157 162 157 476 524710 Workers Comp-Claim Costs 3,051 690 (668) 3,073 524720 Workers Comp - TPA Cost 113 302 106 521 524740 Workers Comp PY Reserve Adj 517 0 0 517 Workers Comp Totals 3,838 1,154 (405) 4,587 Workers Compensation 3,838 1,154 (405) 4,587 Total Compensation Expense 139,278 138,171 146,450 423,900 0 Other Controllable Expenses 0 Food Expenses 0 530009 Raw Food 11,363 12,092 11,944 35,399 Raw Food 11,363 12,092 11,944 35,399 531109 Food Adjustments 0 0 0 0 531300 Food Rebate (775) (675) (675) (2,125) Food Adjustments (775) (675) (675) (2,125) Food Expenses 10,589 11,417 11,268 33,274 Supplies 0 540009 Dietary Supplies 542 353 75 971 Dietary Supplies 542 353 75 971 540509 General Supplies 878 1,770 1,452 4,099 General Supplies 878 1,770 1,452 4,099 544709 Cleaning Supplies 2,066 1,558 1,319 4,943 Cleaning Supplies 2,066 1,558 1,319 4,943 544050 Beauty Supplies & Expenses 636 1,720 437 2,793 Beauty Supplies & Expenses 636 1,720 437 2,793 544900 Postage and Courier Delivery 115 357 386 858 Postage and Courier Delivery 115 357 386 858 545000 Supplies Small & Non-Capital 232 5 689 926 Supplies Small & Non-Capital 232 5 689 926 540510 Durable Medical Equipment 0 0 0 0 Durable Medical Equipment 0 0 0 0 540615 Personal Solutions_PCP 0 7 0 7 Incontinent Supp-Personal Solu 0 7 0 7 Supplies 4,468 5,771 4,358 14,597 Healthcare Supplies 0 540601 Medical Supplies 0 0 0 0 540609 Medical Supplies 9 147 (260) (104) 540671 OTC Pharmacy (10) 0 0 (10) Medical Supplies (1) 147 (260) (114) 540659 Other Healthcare Expenses 408 552 217 1,178 540670 Pharmacy MedA and Managed Care 36 (36) 0 0 543600 Hazardous Medical Waste 0 0 0 0 Other Healthcare Expenses 444 517 217 1,178 Healthcare Supplies 443 663 (43) 1,064 Resident Activities 0 550109 Resident Relations 103 86 78 267 Resident Relations 103 86 78 267 550509 Resident Activities 1,030 667 1,117 2,814 Resident Activities 1,030 667 1,117 2,814 550510 Interactive Technology Expense 279 263 283 825 Interactive Technology Expense 279 263 283 825 Resident Activities 1,412 1,016 1,478 3,906 Travel & Entertainment 0 555409 Vehicle Transport and Rental 29 494 460 983 Vehicle Transport and Rental 29 494 460 983 555000 Lodging 7 741 1,342 2,090 Lodging 7 741 1,342 2,090 555200 Airfare 3 5 2 10 Airfare 3 5 2 10 555900 Meals & Entertainment 5 165 44 214 Meals & Entertainment 5 165 44 214 Travel & Entertainment 44 1,405 1,849 3,297 Repairs & Maintenance 0 560109 Heatng,Plumbing,Electric,Water 3,326 2,166 3,481 8,972 Heat, Plumbg, Electrical,Water 3,326 2,166 3,481 8,972 Page: 4 of 7Run: Jun 12, 2018 at 13:42 By: EHILLARD BSL0030_OR March April May 3 Month Total 560609 R&M Building_Equip_Supp 2,334 5,226 4,700 12,260 R&MBuilding/Equipment/Supplies 2,334 5,226 4,700 12,260 561409 Vehicle Upkeep 387 406 337 1,130 Vehicle Upkeep 387 406 337 1,130 561709 IT Hardware and Maintenance 96 48 48 192 IT Hardware and Maintenance 96 48 48 192 570909 Fire, Safety, and Security 3,929 1,809 1,408 7,146 570950 JLL FM Fire, Safety & Security 0 0 0 0 Fire, Safety, and Security 3,929 1,809 1,408 7,146 Repairs & Maintenance 10,071 9,655 9,974 29,701 Ground Maint & Contract Svcs 0 569009 Outside Grounds Contracts 2,319 2,449 2,319 7,086 569050 JLL FM Landscpng & Grnds Maint 0 0 0 0 Outside Grounds Contracts 2,319 2,449 2,319 7,086 570609 Equipment Service Contracts 91 65 65 221 Equipment Service Contracts 91 65 65 221 570050 JLL FM Program Fees 0 0 0 0 Outside Dept Labor Contracts 0 0 0 0 570700 Elevator Contract 584 (456) 394 523 570750 JLL FM Elevator Maint & Repair 0 0 0 0 Elevator Contract 584 (456) 394 523 570500 Pest Control Contract 987 175 175 1,337 570550 JLL FM Pest Control 0 0 0 0 Pest Control Contract 987 175 175 1,337 Ground Maint & Contract Svcs 3,981 2,233 2,953 9,167 Communication & Telephone 0 580209 Telephone 1,413 1,425 1,777 4,615 Telephone 1,413 1,425 1,777 4,615 580709 Internet_Connected Living 431 250 250 930 Internet / Connected Living 431 250 250 930 581400 Cable & Satellite TV 945 945 945 2,836 Cable & Satellite TV 945 945 945 2,836 Communication & Telephone 2,789 2,620 2,972 8,382 Paid Referrals 0 601739 Paid Referrals 0 0 0 0 Paid_Referrals 0 0 0 0 Paid Referrals 0 0 0 0 Public Relations & Advertising 0 601719 Advertising Digital 1,311 92 554 1,956 601720 Advert-Social Media (Corp Use) 246 117 150 512 Advertising - Digital 1,556 209 703 2,468 600309 Advertising - Local Broadcast 16 8 8 32 Advertising - Local Broadcast 16 8 8 32 600210 Advertising - Corporate Print 1,108 3 51 1,162 Advertising - Local Print 1,108 3 51 1,162 600600 Collatrl Matls - Prospct-Infl 0 227 26 253 Print Collateral Materials 0 227 26 253 601609 Business Development 152 131 0 283 Business Development 152 131 0 283 600109 Direct Mail (Comm Use Only) 0 17 17 34 600120 Direct Mail (Corp Use Only) 11 508 501 1,021 Direct Mail 11 525 518 1,054 601909 Friends for Life Referral Fees 0 1,000 0 1,000 Friends For Life 0 1,000 0 1,000 600709 Special Events 78 142 96 316 Special Events 78 142 96 316 600809 Other Marketing 0 0 62 62 Other Marketing 0 0 62 62 Public Relations & Advertising 2,922 2,244 1,464 6,630 Staff Development 0 650009 Assoc Appreciation_Incentives 136 138 22 296 Associate Appreciatin/Incentiv 136 138 22 296 651509 Staff Training Expenses 377 102 (2) 477 Staff Training 377 102 (2) 477 654509 Pre-Employment Expenses 1,448 1,010 1,747 4,206 Pre-Employment Expenses 1,448 1,010 1,747 4,206 Staff Development 1,961 1,250 1,767 4,978 Professional Fees 0 700100 Collections Legal Fees 0 0 0 0 700400 Corporate SEC Legal Fees 0 0 0 0 Legal Fees 0 0 0 0 710409 Other Professional Fees 0 96 96 192 Other Professional Fees 0 96 96 192 710100 Pharmacy Fees (4) 0 0 (4) Pharmacy Fees (4) 0 0 (4) Professional Fees (4) 96 96 188 Bad Debt Expense 0 750000 Bad Debt Expense (112) 0 0 (112) Bad Debt Expense (112) 0 0 (112) Bad Debt Expense (112) 0 0 (112) Other Misc. Operating Expenses 0 771200 Miscellaneous 0 0 0 0 771209 Misc Expenses and Misc Taxes 0 0 0 0 772401 IT Fees and Support Allocation 1,671 1,442 1,443 4,556 772402 PC Fees SNF-Allocation 0 (75) (1) (76) 772404 Creative Services-Allocation 273 239 211 723 772406 Digital Marketing-Allocation 135 106 266 507 772408 Cust Engagement Survey-Allocat 48 81 49 178 772414 Regional Maint Techs-Allocatio 195 294 305 793 772510 G&A Alloc - PS 23 25 24 72 Misc. Taxes and Expenses 2,345 2,112 2,296 6,753 770300 Association Fees 227 226 226 679 Association Fees 227 226 226 679 770400 Survey & License Fees 89 235 320 644 Survey & License Fees 89 235 320 644 771100 Dues and Subscriptions 99 103 109 311 Dues and Subscriptions 99 103 109 311 771600 Sales and Use Tax 0 0 0 0 Sales and Use Tax 0 0 0 0 Page: 5 of 7Run: Jun 12, 2018 at 13:42 By: EHILLARD BSL0030_OR March April May 3 Month Total 777100 Contra Expense - Rebates (160) (235) (235) (629) Contra Expense - Rebates (160) (235) (235) (629) 771220 Uncoded P-Card (149) 60 25 (64) 771900 Uncoded AP Invoices 0 342 (191) 151 Uncoded Expenses (149) 403 (166) 87 Other Misc. Operating Expenses 2,449 2,845 2,551 7,845 0 Personalized Living Other Expenses - - - 0 Skilled Therapy Other Expenses - - - 0 Total Other Controllable Expenses 41,012 41,217 40,689 122,917 0 Non-Controllable Expenses 0 Utilities 0 760000 Electricity 7,566 6,257 8,464 22,287 Electricity 7,566 6,257 8,464 22,287 761000 Gas 428 372 293 1,093 Gas 428 372 293 1,093 763000 Water and Sewer 3,159 2,430 5,635 11,225 Water and Sewer 3,159 2,430 5,635 11,225 765000 Waste 546 546 546 1,639 765050 JLL FM Waste Management 0 0 0 0 Waste 546 546 546 1,639 766000 Utility Admin Expense 37 37 37 112 AIQ Utility Admin Expense 37 37 37 112 Utilities 11,737 9,642 14,977 36,355 0 Vehicle & Equipment Lease 0 550900 Vehicle Lease 940 943 943 2,826 Vehicle Lease 940 943 943 2,826 550910 Kitchen Equipment Rental 629 664 629 1,922 561600 Offce Equip & Furniture Rental 584 898 848 2,331 Office/Furniture/Kitchenrental 1,213 1,562 1,477 4,252 Vehicle & Equipment Lease 2,153 2,505 2,420 7,078 Insurance Expenses 0 850000 Insurance - Gen Liability Prem 773 768 768 2,310 850100 Insurance-Gen Liab Claim Costs 2,168 2,168 1,783 6,119 850120 GLPL Prior Year Reserve Adj 0 0 0 0 Insurance - Gen Liability 2,941 2,936 2,552 8,428 850600 Insurance - Property Premium 624 625 625 1,875 850610 Insurance - Property Claims 532 368 407 1,307 Insurance - Property 1,157 993 1,032 3,182 850700 Insurance - Auto 103 103 103 308 850710 Auto Claims-Reserve (179) 135 135 90 Insurance - Auto (76) 237 237 398 851700 Insurance - Other 37 48 48 132 Insurance - Other 37 48 48 132 Insurance Expenses 4,058 4,213 3,869 12,140 Real Estate Taxes 0 880000 Real Estate Tax Expense 18,522 18,522 18,522 55,565 880100 Real Estate Tax - Prof Serv 0 0 0 0 Real Estate 18,522 18,522 18,522 55,565 880010 PY Appeal Refunds 0 0 0 0 880020 PY Tax Adjustments 0 0 0 0 Prior Year Refunds&Adjustments 0 0 0 0 880300 Personal Property Taxes 0 0 0 0 Personal Property Taxes 0 0 0 0 Real Estate Taxes 18,522 18,522 18,522 55,565 0 Total Non-Controllable Expenses 36,470 34,882 39,787 111,139 0 OPERATING EXPENSES 216,761 214,270 226,926 657,956 0 Page: 6 of 7Run: Jun 12, 2018 at 13:42 By: EHILLARD BSL0030_OR March April May 3 Month Total NET OPERATING INCOME (LOSS) 18,795 29,066 15,587 63,448 0 Page: 7 of 7Run: Jun 12, 2018 at 13:42 By: EHILLARD BSL0030_OR March April May 3 Month Total 52360 Brookdale Castle Hills AL/MC (TX) Product Unit Style Unit Usage Config Unit # SqFt Agreement # 2nd Person Agreement # Start Date Days Vacant Respite Medicaid Unit Capacity Market Rate Base Rent Rent Discount Net Rent 2nd Person Care Fees- 1st Pers Care Fees- 2nd Pers ST Incentives LT Incentives EF Credits Ancillary Rev Fixed Rate End Date Brookdale Move In Date Business Unit Move In Date Agreement Type Move In Date AL Studio P AL Building/1/1101 379 1793528 05/28/2018 0 - 1.0 2,295 2,295 0 2,295 5/28/2018 5/28/2018 5/28/2018 AL Studio P AL Building/1/1102 416 980129 10/21/2013 0 - 1.0 2,375 2,810 (476) 2,334 680 12/31/2999 10/17/2013 10/17/2013 10/17/2013 AL Studio P AL Building/1/1103 403 1266819 05/29/2015 0 - 1.0 2,375 2,874 (625) 2,249 680 5/29/2015 5/29/2015 5/29/2015 AL Studio P AL Building/1/1104 441 1614565 03/31/2017 0 - 1.0 2,375 2,394 (456) 1,938 1,600 3/27/2015 3/31/2017 4/17/2015 AL Studio P AL Building/1/1105 379 1694154 09/19/2017 0 - 1.0 2,295 2,350 0 2,350 1,600 55 9/19/2017 9/19/2017 9/19/2017 AL Studio P AL Building/1/1106 414 1317443 07/31/2015 0 - 1.0 2,375 3,206 (124) 3,082 7/31/2015 7/31/2015 7/31/2015 AL Studio P AL Building/1/1109 338 1182887 10/31/2014 0 - 1.0 2,225 3,465 (1,750) 1,715 10/31/2014 10/31/2014 10/31/2014 AL Studio P AL Building/1/1110 346 1702967 10/13/2017 0 - 1.0 2,225 2,105 0 2,105 1,100 55 9/19/2017 10/13/2017 10/13/2017 AL Studio P AL Building/1/1111 413 1606174 03/03/2017 0 - 1.0 2,295 2,300 (138) 2,162 800 55 3/3/2017 3/3/2017 3/3/2017 AL Studio P AL Building/1/1112 376 1477901 05/31/2016 0 - 1.0 2,295 2,989 (705) 2,284 47 55 5/31/2016 5/31/2016 5/31/2016 AL Studio P AL Building/1/1113 441 1654121 06/07/2017 0 - 1.0 2,375 2,486 0 2,486 1,450 6/7/2017 6/7/2017 6/7/2017 AL Studio P AL Building/1/1114 408 109 1.0 2,375 0 0 0 AL Studio P AL Building/1/1115 414 938301 03/31/2013 0 - 1.0 2,375 3,695 (1,452) 2,243 113 3/31/2013 3/31/2013 3/31/2013 AL Studio P AL Building/1/1116 381 1331866 08/31/2015 0 - 1.0 2,295 2,520 (795) 1,725 1,401 55 8/31/2015 8/31/2015 8/31/2015 AL Studio P AL Building/1/1119 345 788235 09/29/2011 0 - 1.0 2,225 3,536 0 3,536 9/29/2011 9/29/2011 9/29/2011 AL Studio P AL Building/1/1120 341 1659489 06/26/2017 0 - 1.0 2,225 2,210 0 2,210 1,100 55 6/26/2017 6/26/2017 6/26/2017 AL Studio P AL Building/2/1203 407 303 1.0 2,295 0 0 0 AL Studio P AL Building/2/1204 426 283 1.0 2,375 0 0 0 AL Studio P AL Building/2/1205 384 1783729 04/28/2018 0 - 1.0 2,295 2,375 0 2,375 (2,000) 4/28/2018 4/28/2018 4/28/2018 AL Studio P AL Building/2/1206 414 534 1.0 2,375 0 0 0 AL Studio P AL Building/2/1209 334 1400 1.0 2,225 0 0 0 AL Studio P AL Building/2/1210 337 1773079 03/30/2018 0 - 1.0 2,225 2,105 0 2,105 500 (1,000) 3/30/2018 3/30/2018 3/30/2018 AL Studio P AL Building/2/1211 400 1407934 02/28/2016 0 - 1.0 2,375 3,091 (610) 2,481 57 2/28/2016 2/28/2016 2/28/2016 AL Studio P AL Building/2/1213 431 119 1.0 2,375 0 0 0 AL Studio P AL Building/2/1214 403 1095 1.0 2,375 0 0 0 AL Studio P AL Building/2/1215 407 1650343 05/31/2017 0 - 1.0 2,375 2,510 (338) 2,172 600 5/31/2017 5/31/2017 5/31/2017 AL Studio P AL Building/2/1216 388 1177 1.0 2,295 0 0 0 AL Studio P AL Building/2/1219 336 1746852 01/25/2018 0 - 1.0 2,225 2,105 0 2,105 (500) 1/25/2018 1/25/2018 1/25/2018 AL Studio P AL Building/2/1220 337 636698 03/15/2006 0 - 1.0 2,225 2,663 (230) 2,433 3/15/2006 3/15/2006 3/15/2006 AL Studio P Building 2/1/2102 407 1734427 12/18/2017 0 - 1.0 2,375 2,260 0 2,260 200 (500) 12/18/2017 12/18/2017 12/18/2017 AL Studio P Building 2/1/2103 407 885303 08/25/2012 0 - 1.0 2,375 2,830 0 2,830 737 08/27/2020 8/25/2012 8/25/2012 8/25/2012 AL Studio P Building 2/1/2104 431 1342455 09/25/2015 0 - 1.0 2,375 2,957 (237) 2,720 887 55 9/25/2015 9/25/2015 9/25/2015 AL Studio P Building 2/1/2105 384 34 1.0 2,295 0 0 0 AL Studio P Building 2/1/2106 406 1767403 03/15/2018 0 - 1.0 2,375 2,260 0 2,260 (1,000) 6/13/2015 6/13/2015 6/13/2015 AL Studio P Building 2/1/2109 341 646825 05/16/2009 0 - 1.0 2,225 2,962 (482) 2,480 12/31/2999 5/16/2009 5/16/2009 5/16/2009 AL Studio P Building 2/1/2110 342 1325192 08/15/2015 0 - 1.0 2,225 2,105 (375) 1,730 1,493 8/15/2015 8/15/2015 8/15/2015 AL Studio P Building 2/1/2112 381 1655064 06/13/2017 0 - 1.0 2,295 2,356 0 2,356 600 6/13/2017 6/13/2017 6/13/2017 AL Studio P Building 2/1/2113 428 1521134 1521150 08/30/2016 0 - 1.0 2,375 2,520 0 2,520 876 553 8/30/2016 8/30/2016 8/30/2016 AL Studio P Building 2/1/2114 407 1497270 07/08/2016 0 - 1.0 2,375 2,496 0 2,496 47 55 7/8/2016 7/8/2016 7/8/2016 AL Studio P Building 2/1/2115 407 1501147 07/20/2016 0 - 1.0 2,375 2,496 0 2,496 1,206 7/20/2016 7/20/2016 7/20/2016 AL Studio P Building 2/1/2116 385 1557022 11/11/2016 0 - 1.0 2,295 2,305 (143) 2,162 709 9/13/2016 9/13/2016 9/13/2016 AL Studio P Building 2/1/2119 342 1506170 07/30/2016 0 - 1.0 2,225 2,260 0 2,260 280 55 7/30/2016 7/30/2016 7/30/2016 AL Studio P Building 2/1/2120 339 1379997 12/23/2015 0 - 1.0 2,225 2,868 (420) 2,448 701 5/6/2013 12/23/2015 12/23/2015 AL Studio P Building 2/2/2202 411 763 1.0 2,375 0 0 0 AL Studio P Building 2/2/2203 405 434 1.0 2,295 0 0 0 AL Studio P Building 2/2/2204 437 1557 1.0 2,375 0 0 0 AL Studio P Building 2/2/2205 380 1772 1.0 2,295 0 0 0 AL Studio P Building 2/2/2206 416 598 1.0 2,375 0 0 0 AL Studio P Building 2/2/2209 332 450 1.0 2,225 0 0 0 AL Studio P Building 2/2/2210 344 1125 1.0 2,225 0 0 0 AL Studio P Building 2/2/2213 440 759325 03/31/2011 0 - 1.0 2,375 2,825 0 2,825 (685) 12/31/2999 3/31/2011 3/31/2011 3/31/2011 AL Studio P Building 2/2/2214 402 1187 1.0 2,375 0 0 0 AL Studio P Building 2/2/2215 413 1521 1.0 2,375 0 0 0 AL Studio P Building 2/2/2216 382 1187 1.0 2,295 0 0 0 AL Studio P Building 2/2/2219 349 1174 1.0 2,225 0 0 0 AL Studio P Building 2/2/2220 332 1429221 04/15/2016 0 - 1.0 2,225 2,409 0 2,409 1,026 4/15/2016 4/15/2016 4/15/2016 AL Alcove P AL Building/2/1201 478 1720985 1720987 11/22/2017 0 - 1.0 2,525 2,395 0 2,395 800 550 500 11/22/2017 11/22/2017 11/22/2017 AL Alcove P AL Building/2/1202 523 11 1.0 2,525 0 0 0 AL Alcove P AL Building/2/1212 481 1413 1.0 2,525 0 0 0 AL Alcove P Building 2/1/2101 496 922991 01/30/2013 0 - 1.0 2,525 3,714 (745) 2,969 794 1/30/2013 1/30/2013 1/30/2013 AL Alcove P Building 2/1/2111 531 1494212 06/30/2016 0 - 1.0 2,525 2,731 0 2,731 467 6/30/2016 6/30/2016 6/30/2016 AL Alcove P Building 2/2/2201 470 1773075 03/30/2018 0 - 1.0 2,525 2,395 0 2,395 (1,000) 3/30/2018 3/30/2018 3/30/2018 AL Alcove P Building 2/2/2211 536 957960 07/05/2013 0 - 1.0 2,525 2,395 (94) 2,301 1,305 7/5/2013 7/5/2013 7/5/2013 AL Alcove P Building 2/2/2212 476 265 1.0 2,525 0 0 0 AL One Bedroom P AL Building/1/1107 612 1351192 10/15/2015 0 - 1.0 2,950 3,150 0 3,150 607 10/15/2015 10/15/2015 10/15/2015 AL One Bedroom P AL Building/1/1108 582 750454 01/31/2011 0 - 1.0 2,950 3,152 (673) 2,479 510 12/31/2011 1/31/2011 1/31/2011 1/31/2011 AL One Bedroom P AL Building/1/1117 583 942577 04/29/2013 0 - 1.0 2,950 5,124 (1,235) 3,889 702 55 3/29/2012 3/29/2012 3/29/2012 AL One Bedroom P AL Building/1/1118 615 1773085 03/31/2018 0 - 1.0 2,950 2,795 0 2,795 800 55 5/31/2015 3/31/2018 3/4/2018 AL One Bedroom P AL Building/2/1207 603 1477488 05/31/2016 0 - 1.0 2,950 4,398 (1,250) 3,148 560 5/31/2016 5/31/2016 5/31/2016 AL One Bedroom P AL Building/2/1208 566 1755359 02/12/2018 0 - 1.0 2,950 2,795 0 2,795 1,250 12/5/2017 12/5/2017 2/12/2018 AL One Bedroom P AL Building/2/1217 568 1577712 12/31/2016 0 - 1.0 2,950 3,110 (688) 2,422 1,250 12/31/2016 12/31/2016 12/31/2016 AL One Bedroom P AL Building/2/1218 598 1773083 03/29/2018 0 - 1.0 2,950 2,795 0 2,795 (1,000) 55 3/29/2018 3/29/2018 3/29/2018 AL One Bedroom P Building 2/1/2107 613 1519617 08/26/2016 0 - 1.0 2,950 3,278 0 3,278 8/26/2016 8/26/2016 8/26/2016 AL One Bedroom P Building 2/1/2108 575 1536181 1638465 09/28/2016 0 - 1.0 2,950 2,907 (228) 2,679 832 2,114 750 55 9/28/2016 9/28/2016 4/29/2017 AL One Bedroom P Building 2/1/2117 576 1784066 04/30/2018 0 - 1.0 2,950 2,935 0 2,935 500 9/16/2014 4/30/2018 4/30/2018 AL One Bedroom P Building 2/1/2118 611 1746194 1746199 01/23/2018 0 - 1.0 2,950 2,795 0 2,795 800 500 (500) 1/23/2018 1/23/2018 1/23/2018 AL One Bedroom P Building 2/2/2207 592 1486 1.0 2,950 0 0 0 AL One Bedroom P Building 2/2/2208 572 141 1.0 2,950 0 0 0 Rent Roll as of 5/31/2018 AL One Bedroom P Building 2/2/2217 572 146 1.0 2,950 0 0 0 AL One Bedroom P Building 2/2/2218 601 1757 1.0 2,950 0 0 0 MC Studio P 3102 286 1794462 05/30/2018 0 - 1.0 4,125 4,125 (15) 4,110 5/30/2018 5/30/2018 5/30/2018 MC Studio P 3115 288 854153 03/29/2012 0 - 1.0 4,125 6,538 0 6,538 3/27/2012 3/29/2012 3/29/2012 MC Studio P 3117 292 1429223 04/15/2016 0 - 1.0 3,350 3,105 (300) 2,805 1,600 4/15/2016 4/15/2016 4/15/2016 MC Studio P Arbors/1/3101 293 1682986 08/25/2017 0 - 1.0 4,125 4,072 0 4,072 700 8/25/2017 8/25/2017 8/25/2017 MC Studio P Arbors/1/3103 290 37 1.0 4,125 0 0 0 MC Studio P Arbors/1/3104 267 1757958 02/21/2018 0 - 1.0 4,125 3,915 0 3,915 1,500 (1,000) 2/21/2018 2/21/2018 2/21/2018 MC Studio P Arbors/1/3105 284 1785009 04/30/2018 0 - 1.0 4,125 4,110 0 4,110 900 (500) 4/30/2018 4/30/2018 4/30/2018 MC Studio P Arbors/1/3106 274 1658539 06/21/2017 0 - 1.0 4,125 4,072 (208) 3,864 1,450 1/23/2017 1/23/2017 6/21/2017 MC Studio P Arbors/1/3107 295 1468022 05/08/2016 0 - 1.0 4,125 4,189 (880) 3,309 1,345 3/23/2015 3/23/2015 5/8/2016 MC Studio P Arbors/1/3108 280 1582484 01/11/2017 0 - 1.0 3,350 3,190 0 3,190 1,500 7/29/2014 7/29/2014 1/11/2017 MC Studio P Arbors/1/3109 283 1742377 01/03/2018 0 - 1.0 3,350 3,190 0 3,190 1,800 10/31/2016 10/31/2016 1/3/2018 MC Studio P Arbors/1/3110 286 1506188 07/31/2016 0 - 1.0 4,125 3,935 0 3,935 1,300 7/31/2016 7/31/2016 7/31/2016 MC Studio P Arbors/1/3111 288 1767401 03/15/2018 0 - 1.0 4,125 4,110 0 4,110 550 9/17/2013 3/15/2018 3/15/2018 MC Studio P Arbors/1/3112 282 1721419 1721423 11/22/2017 0 - 1.0 4,125 3,915 0 3,915 1,000 1,523 1,190 (1,000) 11/22/2017 11/22/2017 11/22/2017 MC Studio P Arbors/1/3114 279 1650397 05/31/2017 0 - 1.0 4,125 3,739 0 3,739 500 5/31/2017 5/31/2017 5/31/2017 MC Studio P Arbors/1/3116 273 905715 11/30/2012 0 - 1.0 3,350 4,440 0 4,440 11/30/2012 11/30/2012 11/30/2012 MC Studio SP Arbors/1/3113A 143 155 0.5 2,725 0 0 0 MC Studio SP Arbors/1/3113B 144 1734893 12/18/2017 0 - 0.5 2,725 2,585 0 2,585 952 (1,000) 12/18/2017 12/18/2017 12/18/2017 Grand Total 52360 97.0 265,230 210,087 (15,672) 194,415 4,308 47,086 2,993 (3,000) (8,685) 772 52360 Brookdale Castle Hills AL/MC (TX) Product Unit Style Unit Usage Config Unit Capacity Unit Occup % Unit Occup Resident Count Mo. Market Rate Mo. Net Rent Avg Market Rate Avg Base Rent Avg Rent Discount Avg Net Rent Avg 2nd Person Avg Net Care Avg Incentives AL Studio P 56.0 36.0 64.29% 37 129,480 84,637 2,312 2,611 -260 2,351 24 559 -158 AL Alcove P 8.0 5.0 62.50% 6 20,200 12,791 2,525 2,726 -168 2,558 160 723 -200 AL One Bedroom P 16.0 12.0 75.00% 14 47,200 35,160 2,950 3,270 -340 2,930 136 795 -125 80.0 53.0 66.25% 57 196,880 132,588 2,461 2,771 -269 2,502 62 628 -154 MC Studio P 16.0 15.0 93.75% 16 62,900 59,242 3,931 4,043 -94 3,949 67 1,057 -167 MC Studio SP 1.0 0.5 50.00% 1 5,450 2,585 5,450 5,170 5,170 1,904 -2,000 17.0 15.5 91.18% 17 68,350 61,827 4,021 4,079 -91 3,989 65 1,085 -226 97.0 68.5 70.62% 74 265,230 194,415 2,734 3,067 -229 2,838 63 731 -171 Product Unit Style Unit Usage Config Unit Capacity Unit Occup % Unit Occup Resident Count Mo. Market Rate Mo. Net Rent Avg Market Rate Avg Base Rent Avg Rent Discount Avg Net Rent Avg 2nd Person Avg Net Care Avg Incentives AL Studio P 56.0 36.0 64.29% 37 129,480 84,637 2,312 2,611 -260 2,351 24 559 -158 AL Alcove P 8.0 5.0 62.50% 6 20,200 12,791 2,525 2,726 -168 2,558 160 723 -200 AL One Bedroom P 16.0 12.0 75.00% 14 47,200 35,160 2,950 3,270 -340 2,930 136 795 -125 80.0 53.0 66.25% 57 196,880 132,588 2,461 2,771 -269 2,502 62 628 -154 MC Studio P 16.0 15.0 93.75% 16 62,900 59,242 3,931 4,043 -94 3,949 67 1,057 -167 MC Studio SP 1.0 0.5 50.00% 1 5,450 2,585 5,450 5,170 5,170 1,904 -2,000 17.0 15.5 91.18% 17 68,350 61,827 4,021 4,079 -91 3,989 65 1,085 -226 97.0 68.5 70.62% 74 265,230 194,415 2,734 3,067 -229 2,838 63 731 -171Grand Total AL Total MC Total Grand Total AL Total MC Total Appendix E Letter of Engagement Dallas Area VAS Office 700 E. Campbell Road, Suite 265 Richardson, TX 75081 Valuation & Advisory Services 972 960 1222 us.jll.com/valuation-advisory COPYRIGHT © JONES LANG LASALLE IP, INC. 2018. All Rights Reserved Page 1 June 8, 2018 Elan Ruggill President American Eagle Lifecare Corporation 3819 Hawk Crest Rd Ann Arbor, MI 48103 Office: 734-222-5275 Cell: 734-707-3198 elan@americaneaglelifecare.com RE: 17 Brookdale (the “Property”) JLL Valuation & Advisory Services, LLC (“we” or “JLL”) appreciates the opportunity to provide this proposal for services regarding the Property to you. We agree to perform the services outlined in Exhibit A to this letter (the “Services”) on the terms provided in this letter. In return for JLL providing the Services, you agree to pay JLL as follows: You will pay JLL a fee (the “Fee”) of $93,200 ($5,250 per property plus $3,950 for portfolio report). No retainer is required for this engagement, the full Fee is due and payable when we deliver the Report(s) to you. The Fee includes the expenses related to this engagement. There will be no added charges for travel, delivery fees or report production costs. Our invoices will be addressed to the addressee of our report unless you request otherwise in writing. The Ethics Rule of the Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice (“USPAP”) requires us to disclose to you any prior services (appraisal or otherwise) performed within three years prior to the date of this letter by the individual JLL appraiser who will be performing Services for the Property. In compliance with that requirement, we represent that to our knowledge, that appraiser has provided prior services within the designated disclosure period. Further, to our knowledge, JLL has performed a previous appraisal, appraisal review or appraisal consulting assignment for the Property. This letter is subject to the General Terms and Conditions attached to this letter as Exhibit B, the Statement of Assumptions and Limiting Conditions attached to this letter as Exhibit C. mailto:elan@americaneaglelifecare.com JLL Engagement Letter COPYRIGHT © JONES LANG LASALLE IP, INC. 2018. All Rights Reserved Page 2 Upon your acceptance of this Agreement, we will forward our data needs list and coordinate a property inspection with you. Please note that delays in obtaining the data needed to completed this assignment and/or delays in accessing the property for inspection may result in delays in the date our analysis is completed and delivered to you. We are enthusiastic about the opportunity to work with you on this project. Please sign a copy of this letter as confirmation of our agreements stated in this letter. Very truly yours, JLL VALUATION & ADVISORY SERVICES, LLC Brian Chandler, MAI, CRE, FRICS Executive Vice President READ, AGREED AND ACCEPTED BY: American Eagle Lifecare Corporation _____________________________ _____________________________ Signature Date _____________________________ _____________________________ Printed Name Title ________________________ Title elansr@yahoo.com Typewritten text President elansr@yahoo.com Typewritten text Elan Ruggill elansr@yahoo.com Typewritten text 6-8-2018 elansr@yahoo.com Typewritten text President Exhibit A JLL Engagement Letter COPYRIGHT © JONES LANG LASALLE IP, INC. 2018. All Rights Reserved Page 3 EXHIBIT A PROPOSAL PROPERTY IDENTIFICATION: 17 Brookdale (See list on next page) Portfolio Report PROPERTY TYPE: Existing Independent Living, Assisted Living & Memory Care INTEREST APPRAISED: Fee simple INTENDED USERS: American Eagle Lifecare Corporation NOTE: NO OTHER USERS ARE INTENDED BY JLL VALUATION & ADVISORY. JLL VALUATION & ADVISORY SHALL CONSIDER THE INTENDED USERS WHEN DETERMINING THE LEVEL OF DETAIL TO BE PROVIDED IN THE REPORT. INTENDED USE: To assist Client (intended users) in obtaining bond financing PURPOSE OF APPRAISAL: “As Is” Market Value Prospective Market Value “Upon Stabilization” (if applicable) Investment Value Assuming Not-For-Profit Ownership and Ad Valorem Tax Exemption DATE OF VALUE: Current APPRAISAL STANDARDS: Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice (USPAP) by the Appraisal Foundation and the Code of Professional Ethics and Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice of the Appraisal Institute ANTICIPATED SCOPE OF WORK: Site Visit Interior and exterior observation, on-site Valuation Approaches Sales comparison approach / Cost approach / Income approach / All applicable approaches to value to develop a credible results. Note that a Cost Approach is only provided as applicable, generally for assets under 10 years of age. APPRAISAL REPORT OPTION: Self-Contained Appraisal Report DELIVERY DATE: 30 days from receiving authorization to proceed for the individual reports with portfolio report to follow DELIVERY METHOD: Electronic delivery Exhibit A JLL Engagement Letter COPYRIGHT © JONES LANG LASALLE IP, INC. 2018. All Rights Reserved Page 4 PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS: If the property appraised consists of proposed improvements, Client will provide to JLL all plans, specifications, or other documentation sufficient to identify the extent and character of the proposed improvements. PROPERTIES UNDER CONTRACT FOR SALE: If the Property is currently under contract for sale, Client will provide to JLL a copy of the contract, including all addenda. HYPOTHETICAL CONDITIONS AND EXTRAORDINARY ASSUMPTIONS: To be provided in report Exhibit A JLL Engagement Letter COPYRIGHT © JONES LANG LASALLE IP, INC. 2018. All Rights Reserved Page 5 Valuation & Advisory Exhibit B TERMS AND CONDITIONS COPYRIGHT © JONES LANG LASALLE IP, INC. 2018. All Rights Reserved Page 6 1. I N T R O D U C T I O N 1.1 These Terms and Conditions supplement the proposal, agreement, letter of engagement or email (the “engagement”) between JLL Valuation and Advisory Services, LLC and the Client indicated in the engagement that sets out details of the Services to be provided to the Client. All capitalized terms in this exhibit have the meanings given to them in the engagement unless given a different meaning in this exhibit. These Terms and Conditions, together with the engagement and all other exhibits, schedules and riders to the engagement, are collectively called the “agreement”. 2. S E R V I C E S 2.1 We will provide the Services using reasonable care and skill. 2.2 We may make changes to the Services if necessary to comply with any law or safety requirement. We will notify you if that happens. Otherwise, JLL and the Client must agree in writing to any changes t o the Services, the Fees, or any other provision of the agreement. 3. C L I E N T O B L I G AT I O N S 3.1 You agree to give us all documents and other information that we advise you are reasonably necessary for us to provide the Services. 3.2 You will maintain adequate property and public liability insurance to reasonably insure property that you own or occupy and any activities on that property. You will obtain all necessary licenses, permissions and consents which may be required to enable us to perform the Services (other than professional licenses that we are required to maintain to perform the Services). You are responsible to keep your property in a safe conditions so that we may perform the Services in reasonable safety. 3.3 You will notify us promptly if you believe any information you have provided is incomplete or inaccurate. 4. D E L A Y We are not responsible for any delay in our performance of the Services if caused by any event beyond o u r reasonable control, or for any delay caused by your failure to comply with the agreement. 5. F E E S , E X P E N S E S AN D PAY M E N T 5.1 You agree that your obligation to pay the Fee is not contingent upon the results, conclusions or recommendations we provide. 5.2 If we are asked to invoice any other party, you agree to settle our invoice immediately if the other party does not do so within 30 days of the date of the invoice. 5.3 Delinquent payments under the agreement will earn interest at the rate of one and one-half percent (1-1/2%) per month from the date due until paid, or if lower, the maximum rate permitted by law. If the Fee or any part of it remains unpaid 30 days after it was due, you may not use any report or work product we have delivered to you for any reason. 5.4 If you terminate this agreement before the Services are completed, you will pay us, no later than the termination date, a reasonable fee proportionate to the part of the Services performed to the date of termination. Valuation & Advisory Exhibit B TERMS AND CONDITIONS COPYRIGHT © JONES LANG LASALLE IP, INC. 2018. All Rights Reserved Page 7 5.5 Our rights under Section 5.3 and 5.4 are in addition to, and will not limit, our right to pursue any other rights and remedies under the agreement or at law or in equity. 6. I N D E MN I T Y You agree to indemnify and defend us and hold us harmless from any loss, liability or expense (including attorneys’ fees) arising from a third party action, claim or proceeding (“Loss”) that we suffer arising out of the agreement or the Services, other than Loss that a court of competent jurisdiction has determined was the result of our negligence or willful misconduct. We agree to indemnify and defend you and hold you harmless from any Loss that you suffer arising out of our negligent performance of Services under the agreement, other than Loss that is found by a court of competent jurisdiction to result from your negligence or willful misconduct. 7. E X C L U S I O N S O F , AN D L I MI T AT I O N S O N , L I AB I L I T Y 7.1 EACH OF JLL AND THE CLIENT WAIVES ANY CLAIMS AGAINST EACH OTHER FOR LOSS OF PROFITS, CONSEQUENTIAL, PUNITIVE, EXEMPLARY OR SIMILAR DAMAGES IN CONNECTION WITH THE AGREEMENT. IN NO EVENT SHALL JLL’S LIABILITY IN CONNECTION WITH THE AGREEMENT EXCEED THE FEE PAID TO JLL HEREUNDER. 8. T E R MI N AT I O N 8.1 Either of us may terminate the agreement without reason by giving 30 days' advance written notice to the other. 8.2 Either of us may terminate the agreement immediately if the other breaches the agreement and fails to remedy the breach within 10 days of notice by the non-breaching party. 8.3 We may terminate the agreement immediately for any of the following reasons: (a) We cannot provide any of the Services due to conditions beyond our reasonable control. (b) In our reasonable opinion, there is insufficient information available to provide a report or other work product that meets our standards. (c) A conflict of interest arises which prevents us from acting for you. (d) You have asked us to provide reports or work product that we do not consider to be accurate. 9. AP P R AI S AL R E P O R T AS S U MP T I O N S AN D L I MI T AT I O N S 9.1 Any report or other work product we deliver as part of the Services will be subject to our standard Statement of Assumptions and Limiting Conditions, provided as an exhibit and as part of the agreement, which will be incorporated into the report or work product. 10. C O N F I D E N T I AL I T Y 10.1 We each agree to maintain the confidentiality of each other's confidential information and will not disclose any information received in confidence from each other, until two years after termination or expiration of the agreement, except where required to do so by law. Valuation & Advisory Exhibit B TERMS AND CONDITIONS COPYRIGHT © JONES LANG LASALLE IP, INC. 2018. All Rights Reserved Page 8 10.2 Any report or other work product that we deliver to you in connection with the Services is confidential and may be used by only you, unless we agree otherwise in writing. 11. I N T E L L E C T U A L P R O P E R T Y R I G H T S 11.1 We retain all copyright (and other intellectual property rights) in all materials, reports, systems and other deliverables which we produce or develop for the purposes of the agreement, or which we use to provide the Services. 11.2 You will not reproduce or copy any part of any report or other work product we produce as part of the Services without our prior written consent. 12. G E N E R A L 12.1 The agreement may be modified only by a written agreement signed by both of us. Liability accruing before the agreement terminates or expires will survive termination or expiration. 12.2 The agreement states the entire agreement, and supersedes all prior agreements, between you and JLL with respect to the matters described in the agreement. 12.3 If a court determines that any part of the agreement is unenforceable, the remainder of the agreement will remain in effect. 12.4 The agreement is governed by the laws of the State of Illinois. Each of us irrevocably submits to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of that State. 12.5 The agreement may be executed in multiple counterparts. 12.6 No director, officer, agent, employee or representative of either of us has any personal liability in connection with the agreement. 12.7 Neither of us may assign or transfer any rights or obligations under the agreement without the prior written approval of the other. We each agree to be reasonable in evaluating such a request for approval. 12.8 If there is any conflict between the terms of the letter and this exhibit, the terms of the letter will prevail. 12.9 If either of us fails to enforce any provision or exercise any right under the Agreement at any time, that failure will not operate as a waiver to enforce that provision or to exercise that right at any other time. 12.10 The agreement does not establish any partnership or joint venture between us, or make either of us the agent of the other. 12.11 A person who is not a party to the agreement does not have any rights to enforce its terms unless specifically agreed in writing. 12.12 Neither of us may publicize or issue any specific information to the media about the Services or the agreement without the written consent of the other. 12.13 Each of us represents to the other that it is not a person or entity with whom U.S. entities are restricted from doing business under regulations of the Office of Foreign Asset Control (“OFAC”) of the Department of the Treasury (including those named on OFAC’s Specially Designated and Blocked Persons List) or under any statute, executive order or other governmental action. Each of us agrees to comply with all applicable laws, statutes, and regulations relating to anti-bribery and anti-corruption. Valuation & Advisory Exhibit B TERMS AND CONDITIONS COPYRIGHT © JONES LANG LASALLE IP, INC. 2018. All Rights Reserved Page 9 12.14 If you do not comply with your obligations under the agreement and we commence legal action to enforce our rights, you will reimburse our reasonable costs (including attorneys’ fees), associated with such action. THE PARTIES HEREBY WAIVE TRIAL BY JURY. 12.15 Sections 5, 6, 7, 10, 11, 12.1, 13, 17 and 18 will survive termination of the agreement. 13. U S E O F D AT A AN D D AT A P R O T E C T I O N 13.1 You agree as follows: (i) The data we collect in connection with the agreement will remain our property. (ii) We and our affiliates may utilize, sell and include data you have provided (either in the aggregate or individually) in the databases of JLL and its affiliates and for use in derivative products. (iii) We may utilize all data already in the public domain on an unrestricted basis. 13.2 In order for us to provide the Services, we may need to record and maintain in hard copy and/or in electronic form, information regarding the Client, its officers and any other individuals connected with the Client (collectively “Data Subjects”). We may also verify the identity of Data Subjects, which could include carrying out checks with third parties such as credit reference, anti- money laundering or sanctions checking agencies. 13.3 We may use all information that we hold regarding Data Subjects to provide the Services. We may also use and share it with third parties for other purposes as described in our Privacy Statement available at www.jll.com. 13.4 We may use both commercially available and proprietary software programs to perform the Services (web based and others). 14. S P E C I AL E X P E R T S 14.1 If you request our assistance in hiring a special expert to contribute to any assignment (such as a surveyor, environmental consultant, land planner, architect, engineer, business, personal property, machinery and equipment appraiser, among others), you will perform your own due diligence to qualify the special expert. You will be responsible to pay for the services of the special expert. 14.2 We not responsible for the actions and findings of any special expert. You agree to indemnify and defend us and hold us harmless from all damages that may arise out of your reliance on any special expert. 15. C O N F L I C T S P O L I C Y JLL adheres to a strict conflict of interest policy. If we learn of a conflict of interest, we will notify you and recommend a course of action to resolve the conflict. If we learn of a conflict that we do not believe can be resolved, we may terminate the agreement without penalty. 16. F I R R E A R E Q U I R E ME N T S Federal banking regulations require banks and other lending institutions to engage appraisers where FIRREA compliant appraisals must be used in connection with mortgage loans or other transactions involving federally regulated lending institutions. Given that requirement, any report produced by JLL under the agreement, if ordered Valuation & Advisory Exhibit B TERMS AND CONDITIONS COPYRIGHT © JONES LANG LASALLE IP, INC. 2018. All Rights Reserved Page 10 independent of a financial institution or agent, might not be FIRREA compliant or acceptable to a federally regulated financial institution. 17. U S E O F W O RK P R O D U CT AN D R E L I AN C E 17.1 You agree that any report or other work product we produce in connection with the Services are for your use only, and only for the purpose indicated in the agreement. No person or entity other than the Client may use or rely on any such report or work product unless we consent otherwise in writing, even if such reliance is foreseeable. Any person who receives a copy of any report or other work product we produce as a consequence of disclosure requirements that apply to the Client, does not become an intended user of this report unless the Client specifically identified them at the time of the engagement. 17.2 You will not use any such report or work product in connection with any public documents. You will not refer to JLL in any public documents without our prior written consent. We may give or withhold our consent in our sole discretion for any purpose under this Section 17. 18. L I T I G AT I O N MAT T E R S 18.1 We are not required to testify or provide court-related consultation or to be in attendance in court unless we have agreed to do so in the agreement or otherwise in writing, or if required by law. 18.2 If we receive a subpoena or other judicial command to produce documents or to provide testimony in a lawsuit or proceeding regarding the agreement, we will notify you if allowed by law to do so. However, if we are not a party to these proceedings, you agree to compensate us for our professional time at the then prevailing hourly rates of the personnel responding to the subpoena or providing testimony, and to reimburse us for our actual expenses incurred in responding to any such subpoena or judicial command, including attorneys' fees, if any, as they are incurred. Valuation & Advisory Exhibit C STATEMENT OF ASSUMPTIONS AND LIMITING CONDITIONS COPYRIGHT © JONES LANG LASALLE IP, INC. 2018. All Rights Reserved Page 11 1. All reports and work product we deliver to you (collectively called “report”) represents an opinion of value, based on historical information and forecasts of market conditions. Actual results may vary from those forecast in the report. There is no guaranty or warranty that the opinion of value reflects the actual value of the property. 2. The conclusions stated in our report apply only as of the effective date of the appraisal, and no representation is made as to the effect of subsequent events. Assessed values may change significantly and unexpectedly over short periods. We are not liable for any conclusions in the report that may be different if there are subsequent changes in value. We are not liable for loss relating to reliance upon our report more than three months after its date. 3. There may be differences between projected and actual results because events and circumstances frequently do not occur as predicted, and those differences may be material. We are not liable for any loss arising from these differences. 4. We are not obligated to predict future political, economic or social trends. We assume no responsibility for economic factors that may affect or alter the opinions in the report if the economic factors were not present as of the date of the letter of transmittal accompanying the report. 5. The report reflects an appraisal of the property free of any liens or encumbrances unless otherwise stated. 6. We assume responsible ownership and competent property management. 7. The appraisal process requires information from a wide variety of sources. We have assumed that all information furnished by others is correct and complete, up to date and can be relied upon, but no warranty is given for its accuracy. We do not accept responsibility for erroneous information provided by others. We assume that no information that has a material effect on our appraisal has been withheld. 8. We assume the following, unless informed to the contrary in writing: Each property has a good and marketable title. All documentation is satisfactorily drawn and that there are no encumbrances, restrictions, easements or other adverse title conditions, which would have a material effect on the value of the interest under consideration. There is no material litigation pending involving the property. All information provided by the Client, or its agents, is correct, up to date and can be relied upon. We are not responsible for considerations requiring expertise in other fields, including but not limited to: legal descriptions, interpretation of legal documents and other legal matters, geologic considerations such as soils and seismic stability, engineering, or environmental and toxic contaminants. We recommend that you engage suitable consultants to advise you on these matters. 9. We assume that all engineering studies correct. The plot plans and illustrative material in the report are included only to help the reader visualize the property. 10. We assume that there are no hidden or unapparent conditions of the property, subsoil or structures that render it more Valuation & Advisory Exhibit C STATEMENT OF ASSUMPTIONS AND LIMITING CONDITIONS COPYRIGHT © JONES LANG LASALLE IP, INC. 2018. All Rights Reserved Page 12 or less valuable. We are not responsible for such conditions or for obtaining the engineering studies that may be required to discover them. 11. We assume that the property is in full compliance with all applicable federal, state, and local environmental regulations and laws unless the lack of compliance is stated, described, and considered in the report. We have not made or requested any environmental impact studies in conjunction with the report. We reserve the right to revise or rescind any opinion of value that is based upon any subsequent environmental impact studies. If any environmental impact statement is required by law, the report assumes that such statement will be favorable and will be approved by the appropriate regulatory bodies. 12. Unless otherwise stated in the report, you should assume that we did not observe any hazardous materials on the property. We have no knowledge of the existence of such materials on or in the property; however, we are not qualified to detect such substances, and we are not providing environmental services. The presence of substances such as asbestos, urea- formaldehyde foam insulation and other potentially hazardous materials may affect the value of the property. Our report assumes that there is no such material on or in the property that would cause a loss in value. We do not assume responsibility for such conditions or for any expertise or engineering knowledge required to discover them. We encourage you to retain an expert in this field, if desired. We are not responsible for any such environmental conditions that exist or for any engineering or testing that might be required to discover whether such conditions exist. We are not experts in the field of environmental conditions, and the report is not an environmental assessment of the property. 13. We may have reviewed available flood maps and may have noted in the report whether the property is generally located within or out of an identified Special Flood Hazard Area. However, we are not qualified to detect such areas and therefore do not guarantee such determinations. The presence of flood plain areas and/or wetlands may affect the value of the property. Any opinion of value we include in our report assumes that floodplain and/or wetlands interpretations are accurate. 14. The Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) became effective January 26, 1992. We have not made a specific survey or analysis of the property to determine whether it is in compliance with the ADA. We claim no expertise in ADA issues, and render no opinion regarding compliance of the property with ADA regulations. 15. We assume that the property conforms to all applicable zoning and use regulations and restrictions unless we have identified, described and considered a non-conformity in the report. 16. We assume that all required licenses, certificates of occupancy, consents, and other legislative or administrative authority from any local, state, or national government or private entity or organization have been or can be obtained or renewed for any use on which the opinion of value contained in the report is based. 17. We assume that the use of the land and improvements is confined within the Valuation & Advisory Exhibit C STATEMENT OF ASSUMPTIONS AND LIMITING CONDITIONS COPYRIGHT © JONES LANG LASALLE IP, INC. 2018. All Rights Reserved Page 13 boundaries or property lines of the property described and that there is no encroachment or trespass unless noted in the report. 18. We have not made any investigation of the financial standing of actual or prospective tenants unless specifically noted in the report. Where properties are valued with the benefit of leasing, we assume, unless we are informed otherwise, that the tenants are capable of meeting their financial obligations under the leases, all rent and other amounts payable under the leases have been paid when due, and that there are no undisclosed breaches of the leases. 19. We did not conduct a formal survey of the property and assume no responsibility for any survey matters. The Client has supplied the spatial data, including sketches and/or surveys included in the report, and we assume that data is correct, up to date and can be relied upon. 20. Unless otherwise stated, the opinion of value included in our report excludes any additional value attributable to goodwill, or to fixtures and fittings which are only of value, in situ, to the present occupier. We have made no allowance for any plant, machinery or equipment unless they form an integral part of the building and would normally be included in a sale of the building. We do not normally carry out or commission investigations into the capacity or condition of services being provided to the property. We assume that the services, and any associated controls or software, are in working order and free from defect. We also assume that the services are of sufficient capacity to meet current and future needs. 21. In the case of property where construction work is in progress, such as refurbishment or repairs, or where developments are in progress, we have relied upon cost information supplied to us by the Client or its appointed experts or upon industry accepted cost guides. In the case of property where construction work is in progress, or has recently been completed, we do not make allowance for any liability already incurred, but not yet discharged, in respect of completed work, or obligations in favor of contractors, subcontractors or any members of the professional or design team. We assume the satisfactory completion of construction, repairs or alterations in a workmanlike manner. 22. Any allocation in the report of value between the land and the improvements applies only under the stated program of utilization. The separate values allocated to the land and buildings must not be used in conjunction with any other appraisal and are invalid if so used. 23. The report is confidential to the party to whom it is addressed and those other intended users specified in the report for the specific purpose to which it refers. Use of the report for any other purpose or use by any party not identified as an intended user of the report without our prior written consent is prohibited, and we accept no responsibility for any use of the report in violation of the terms of this Agreement. 24. We are not required to testify or provide court-related consultation or to be in attendance in court unless we have agreed to do so in writing. Valuation & Advisory Exhibit C STATEMENT OF ASSUMPTIONS AND LIMITING CONDITIONS COPYRIGHT © JONES LANG LASALLE IP, INC. 2018. All Rights Reserved Page 14 25. Neither the whole report, nor any part, nor reference thereto, may be published in any manner without our prior written approval. 26. We may rely on, and will not verify, the accuracy and sufficiency of documents, information and assumptions provided to it by the Client or others. We will not verify documents, information and assumptions derived from industry sources or that JLL or its affiliates have prepared in the regular course of business. We are not liable for any deficiency in the report arising from the inaccuracy or insufficiency of such information, documents and assumptions. However, our report will be based on our professional evaluation of all such available sources of information. 27. JLL IS NOT LIABLE TO ANY PERSON OR ENTITY FOR LOSS OF PROFITS, CONSEQUENTIAL, PUNITIVE, EXEMPLARY OR SIMILAR DAMAGES IN CONNECTION WITH THIS AGREEMENT. IN NO EVENT SHALL THE LIABILITY OF JLL AND ITS AFFILIATES IN CONNECTION WITH THIS AGREEMENT EXCEED THE FEE PAID TO JLL HEREUNDER. 28. Unless expressly advised to the contrary, we assume that appropriate insurance coverage is and will continue to be available on commercially acceptable terms. 29. We assume that no material changes in any applicable federal, state or local laws, regulations or codes (including, without limitation, the Internal Revenue Code) are anticipated. 30. We may determine during the course of the assignment that additional Hypothetical Conditions and Extraordinary Assumptions may be required in order to complete the assignment. The report will be subject to those Hypothetical Conditions and Extraordinary Assumptions. Each person that is permitted to use the report agrees to be bound by all the Assumptions and Limiting Conditions and any Hypothetical Conditions and Extraordinary Assumptions stated in the report. Appendix F Analyst Qualifications JLL Biography COPYRIGHT © JONES LANG LASALLE IP, INC. 2018. All Rights Reserved 1 Andrea Roberts Senior Analyst Current Responsibilities Andrea Roberts serves as a senior analyst in JLL’s Valuation and Advisory Services (VAS) in the United States. In this role, she conducts appraisals, market studies and other consulting assignments for seniors housing assets nationwide. Experience Prior to joining JLL in late 2016, Mrs. Roberts was with national valuation firm where she performed similar duties to those now being performed with JLL. Mrs. Roberts joined the national valuation firm in April 2012 as an analyst and has performed appraisal services consisting of narrative and summary real estate appraisals for various types of real property including multi-purposes building, industrial facilities, retail center and apartment complexes. Education and Affiliations Baylor University, Bachelor Business Administration in Real Estate Certified General Real Estate Appraiser in TX, OK, CO & GA Contact T: 214-396-5453 E: andrea.roberts@am.jll.com Douglas E. Oldmixon Commissioner Texas Appraiser Licensing and Certification BoardTexas Appraiser Licensing and Certification BoardTexas Appraiser Licensing and Certification BoardTexas Appraiser Licensing and Certification Board P.O. Box 12188 Austin, Texas 78711-2188 Certified General Real Estate Appraiser Having provided satisfactory evidence of the qualifications required by the Texas Appraiser Licensing and Certification Act, Texas Occupations Code, Chapter 1103, is authorized to use this title, Certified General Real Estate Appraiser. Number: Issued: 1380731 Expires: 08/31/2019 ANDREA JOY ROBERTS 700 E CAMPBELL RD #265 RICHARDSON, TX 75081 Appraiser: 08/29/2017 ANDREA JOY ROBERTS TX G You may wish to laminate the pocket identification card to preserve it. Inquiry as to the status of this license may be made to: Texas Appraiser Licensing and Certification Board P.O. Box 12188 Austin, Tx 78711-2188 www.talcb.texas.gov (512) 936-3001 Fax:(512) 936-3899 Douglas E. Oldmixon Commissioner The person named on the reverse is licensed by the Texas Appraiser Licensing and Certification Board. Texas Appraiser Licensing and Certification BoardTexas Appraiser Licensing and Certification BoardTexas Appraiser Licensing and Certification BoardTexas Appraiser Licensing and Certification Board P.O. Box 12188 Austin, Texas 78711-2188 Certified General Real Estate Appraiser Having provided satisfactory evidence of the qualifications required by the Texas Appraiser Licensing and Certification Act, Texas Occupations Code, Chapter 1103, is authorized to use this title, Certified General Real Estate Appraiser. Number#: Issued: Expires: 1380731 08/31/2019 Appraiser: 08/29/2017 ANDREA JOY ROBERTS TX G JLL Biography COPYRIGHT © JONES LANG LASALLE IP, INC. 2017. All Rights Reserved 1 Brian L. Chandler, MAI, CRE, FRICS Executive Vice President Current Responsibilities Brian Chandler serves as the Executive Vice President in JLL's Valuation and Advisory Services (VAS) in the United States. In this role, he is focused on conducting appraisals, market studies, large portfolio engagements and consulting assignments for seniors housing and health care properties nationwide. Mr. Chandler has been actively engaged in commercial real estate valuation and consulting since 1989. In addition, experience includes real estate brokerage, tenant representation, asset management, preparation and desk review of consulting and valuation reports, market studies, cash flow analysis reports for owners/developers, insurance companies, pension fund advisors, governmental agencies, commercial lending institutions, and investment companies. Experience Prior to joining JLL in late 2016, Mr. Chandler was with a national valuation firm, where he most recently served as Managing Director/Partner with the Dallas office and Associate National Practice Leader of the Seniors Housing & Health Care Specialty Practice. Mr. Chandler has held senior level positions with Cushman & Wakefield and GMAC Commercial Mortgage. Education and Affiliations  University of North Texas, Denton, TX, Bachelor of Business Administration  MAI designation by the Appraisal Institute (#12453)  Member of the North Texas Commercial Association of Realtors  Member of the American Senior Housing Association (ASHA)  Member of the North Texas Chapter of The Appraisal Institute  CRE designation by the Counselors of Real Estate in 2012  Certified General Real Estate Appraiser in AL, AR, AZ, CA, CO, GA, HI, IA, IL, IN, KY, LA, MA, MD, MI, MN, MS, MO, NE, NJ, NY, NC, OH, OK, OR, PA, SC, TN, TX, UT, VA, WA Contact T: +1-214-396-5423 E: brian.chandler@am.jll.com Douglas E. Oldmixon Commissioner Texas Appraiser Licensing and Certification BoardTexas Appraiser Licensing and Certification BoardTexas Appraiser Licensing and Certification BoardTexas Appraiser Licensing and Certification Board P.O. Box 12188 Austin, Texas 78711-2188 Certified General Real Estate Appraiser Having provided satisfactory evidence of the qualifications required by the Texas Appraiser Licensing and Certification Act, Texas Occupations Code, Chapter 1103, is authorized to use this title, Certified General Real Estate Appraiser. Number: Issued: 1324513 Expires: 12/31/2018 BRIAN LEE CHANDLER 700 E CAMPBELL RD STE 265 RICHARDSON, TX 75081 Appraiser: 11/09/2016 BRIAN LEE CHANDLER TX G You may wish to laminate the pocket identification card to preserve it. Inquiry as to the status of this license may be made to: Texas Appraiser Licensing and Certification Board P.O. Box 12188 Austin, Tx 78711-2188 www.talcb.texas.gov (512) 936-3001 Fax:(512) 936-3899 Douglas E. Oldmixon Commissioner The person named on the reverse is licensed by the Texas Appraiser Licensing and Certification Board. Texas Appraiser Licensing and Certification BoardTexas Appraiser Licensing and Certification BoardTexas Appraiser Licensing and Certification BoardTexas Appraiser Licensing and Certification Board P.O. Box 12188 Austin, Texas 78711-2188 Certified General Real Estate Appraiser Having provided satisfactory evidence of the qualifications required by the Texas Appraiser Licensing and Certification Act, Texas Occupations Code, Chapter 1103, is authorized to use this title, Certified General Real Estate Appraiser. Number#: Issued: Expires: 1324513 12/31/2018 Appraiser: 11/09/2016 BRIAN LEE CHANDLER TX G Certification Table of Contents Addenda Summary of Salient Facts and Conclusions Strengths and Weaknesses General Information Identification of the Subject Purpose of the Appraisal Intended User(s) and Intended Uses(s) Pertinent Dates Prior Services Definition of Market Values Assets Appraised Property Rights Appraised Scope of Work Inspection Data Collection Approaches to Value Report Type Compliance Competency Ownership, History and Management of the Subject Current Ownership Ownership History Current Status Management Assumptions and Limiting Conditions Extraordinary Assumptions Hypothetical Conditions Regional Economic Analysis Conclusion Market Area Description and Analysis Delineation of Primary Market Area Physical Barriers Psychological Barriers Location of Competing Facilities Market Area Delineation Conclusion Composition Social Forces Population Growth Household Growth Income Levels Housing Market Public Services Street Improvements Police/Fire Protection Schools Shopping Medical Seniors Housing Market Demographics Conclusion Site Description and Analysis Conclusion Improvement Description and Analysis Introduction Subject Photographs Unit/Bed Mix and Building Areas Payor Types Summary of Construction Components Commercial Space Intangible Items Condition Third Party Reports Effective Age and Remaining Economic Life Functional Utility Conclusion Legal Constraints Analysis Zoning Deed Restrictions Licensing Requirements License Terms Definitions Resident Agreements Disclosures Admissions Services Service Planning Third-Party Providers Medications Food Service Staffing Training Apartment Provisions Dementia Provisions Background Checks Monitoring License Potential Changes in the Regulatory Environment Conclusion Ad Valorem Tax Analysis Tax Rate Current Assessed Value Special Assessments Texas Franchise Tax Total Taxes Seniors Housing Market Analysis Aging Trends Other Factors Leading to Increased Demand National Senior Housing Supply Trends New Development National Demand Trends Community Age Seniors Housing Occupancy Payment Types Assisted Living Conclusion Supply and Demand Analysis Introduction Metro Market Supply and Demand Conditions Delineation of the Market Area Target Market Methodology for Quantifying Supply Assisted Living Supply Analysis Existing Supply of Assisted Living Occupancy of Competitive Supply Assisted Living under Construction or Proposed Memory Care Supply Analysis Existing Supply of Memory Care Occupancy of Competitive Supply Memory Care under Construction or Proposed Barriers to Entry Seniors Housing Demand Analysis Target Group 1 Target Group 2 Target Group 3 Target Group 4 Income and ADL Qualification Discussion of Achievable Penetration Rates Demand Estimates Comparison of Supply and Demand Supply and Demand Conclusion Highest and Best Use Analysis Highest and Best Use of the Land as though Vacant Legally Permissible Physically Possible Financially Feasible Maximally Productive Highest and Best Use of the Property as Improved Legally Permissible Physically Possible Financially Feasible Maximally Productive Income Capitalization - Direct Capitalization Income and Expense Analysis Pricing Structures Market Rent Analysis Market Rent Survey Adjustment for Concessions Adjustment for Entrance Fees Adjustment for Size and/or Type Adjustment for Levels of Care Adjustment for Utilities Adjustment for Meals Adjustment for Housekeeping Adjustment for Parking Adjustment for Location Adjustment for Age/Quality/Condition Summary of Adjustments Rent Roll Summary Occupancy, Concessions, Collection Losses, Loss to Leases Resident Day Occupancy Market Area Occupancy National Occupancy Data Forecasted Stabilized Occupancy Concessions/Loss to Leases Additional Meals/Care Income Meals Additional Care/Level of Care Income Commercial Income Parking Income Assessment/Community Fee Second Person Charges Other Income Estimate of Effective Gross Income Operating Expenses Income and Expense Comparables Expenses Property Expenses Housekeeping and Laundry Dietary Costs Care Expense Activities and Other Expenses General and Administrative Expenses Management Fees Replacement Reserve Total Payroll, Bonuses, Taxes, and Benefits Total Expenses Income and Expense Pro Forma Prospective Values JLL Seniors Housing Investor Survey Inflation Trends (Winter 2018) Capitalization Rate JLL Seniors Housing Investor Survey Capitalization Rate Trends (Winter 2018) Extraction from Comparable Sales NIC Survey Band of Investment Capitalization Rate Conclusion Indicated Value via the Income Approach - Direct Capitalization Sales Comparison Approach Applicability to Subject Presentation of Comparables Sales Price per Unit Analysis Property Rights Conveyed Financing Terms Conditions of Sale Occupancy at Sale Market Conditions Summary of Non-Physical Adjustments Physical Elements of Comparison Location Physical Characteristics Age Quality Economic Characteristics Use/Zoning Non-Realty Components Summary of Adjustments for Physical Elements of Comparison Sales Price Trends Continuum/Graphing Analysis Effective Gross Income Multiplier Indicated Value via Sales Comparison Land Valuation Extent of the Data Search Transactions Confirmed Adjustment for Non-Physical Elements of Comparison Property Rights Conveyed Financing Terms Conditions of Sale Market Conditions Summary of Adjustments Adjustment for Physical Elements of Comparison Site Size Zoning Functional Utility Location Summary of Adjustments Indicated Value of the Site as Though Vacant FF&E Analysis Replacement Cost of FF&E Analysis of Depreciation Absorption and Income Loss Analysis Current Status Absorption Income Loss Forecast Conclusion Market Value of the Specified Assets of the Business As Is Prospective Market Value of the Specified Assets of the Business upon Stabilization Investment Value Assuming Not-For-Profit Operations and Ad Valorem Tax Exemption Value Allocation Lease Analysis Management Fee Capitalization Method Cost Residual Method Allocation Conclusion Exposure Time Marketing Time – JLL Seniors Housing Investor Survey (Winter 2018) Final Value Estimate

Calculate your order
Pages (275 words)
Standard price: $0.00
Client Reviews
4.9
Sitejabber
4.6
Trustpilot
4.8
Our Guarantees
100% Confidentiality
Information about customers is confidential and never disclosed to third parties.
Original Writing
We complete all papers from scratch. You can get a plagiarism report.
Timely Delivery
No missed deadlines – 97% of assignments are completed in time.
Money Back
If you're confident that a writer didn't follow your order details, ask for a refund.
Power up Your Academic Success with the
Team of Professionals. We’ve Got Your Back.
Power up Your Study Success with Experts We’ve Got Your Back.

Order your essay today and save 30% with the discount code ESSAYHELP