LAW interview reflection
Part C – Reflection on Interview (10%) (due date 5 February 2021)
You are to submit a written reflection of the interview, using the “4R” method of reflective practice. Your reflection should consider the following 4 elements:
Report – what was required to achieve an effective interview?
Relate – were you able to relate previous knowledge or use communication skills learnt in your studies to help understand the issue/undertake the task?
Reason – what are the significant factors underlying the success of an interview and why are these factors important?
Reconstruct – How might you do this next time, what might work and why?
Part C – Reflection on Interview (10%) (due date 5 February 2021)
You are to submit a written reflection of the interview, using the “4R” method of reflective practice. Your reflection should consider the following 4 elements:
Report – what was required to achieve an effective interview?
Relate – were you able to relate previous knowledge or use communication skills learnt in your studies to help understand the issue/undertake the task?
Reason – what are the significant factors underlying the success of an interview and why are these factors important?
Reconstruct – How might you do this next time, what might work and why?
|
Criteria |
High Distinction |
Distinction |
Credit |
Pass |
Fail |
|
Ability to reflect on professional practice |
The reflection is well-articulated and of a sophisticated standard. It clearly connects your experience from practice and learning in the subject through the examination of insights gained from the interview. |
The reflection is well-articulated and of a high standard. It clearly connects your experience from practice and learning in the subject through the examination of insights gained from the interview. |
The reflection is clear and mostly well articulated. It connects your experience from practice and learning in the subject through the examination of insights gained from the interview. It contains some analysis but is mostly descriptive. |
The reflection is mostly clear. It connects your experience from practice and learning but is mostly descriptive of your interview. |
|
|
Control of Syntax and Mechanics |
Uses graceful language that skilfully communicates meaning to readers with clarity and fluency, and is virtually error-free. |
Uses straightforward language that generally conveys meaning to readers. The language in the portfolio has few errors. |
Uses language that generally conveys meaning to readers with clarity, although writing may include some errors. |
Uses language that has some errors which do not substantially impede meaning. |
|
|
Referencing |
Demonstrates an ability to cite and reference accurately and comply with the AGLC4 as a system with no errors. |
Demonstrates an ability to cite and reference accurately and comply with the AGLC4 as a system with minor errors. |
Demonstrates an ability to cite and reference accurately and comply with the AGLC4 as a system with limited errors. |
Demonstrates an ability to cite and reference accurately and comply with the AGLC4 as a system with errors. |
IMPORTANT
1. You are to format your reflection in a Word document, using the Centre for Law and Justice coversheet, available in resources.
2. Prior to submitting your assignment, you should submit it to the LAW116 Turnitin account.
3. You are to submit your reflection through EASTS.
4. The word limit for this assignment is 1000 words (+/- 10%), excluding the coversheet.
5. You should include your potential interview questions as an appendix to your reflection. The appendix is not included in the word count.
6. You should reference using
AGLC4 style referencing
.
|
General Information |
Tyson has been charged with contravening an apprehended violence order. He and his wife Charlotte have recently separated. The day they separated, Tyson became very angry and screamed at Charlotte, “If you leave, I’ll hunt you down and kill you.” Charlotte reported this to the Police, who took out an apprehended violence order on her behalf. The order included a condition that Tyson not contact Charlotte by any means. The following week, Tyson telephoned Charlotte and they got into an argument. No threats were made. Charlotte contacted the police and Tyson was charged with breach AVO. Tyson agrees that he contacted Charlotte, and that he knew he wasn’t meant to. Tyson is heartbroken about separating from Charlotte and is frequently teary when he meets with you. He is very worried about whether he will be stopped from seeing his children and is preoccupied with this problem. Crimes (Domestic and Personal Violence) Act 2007 (NSW) s14: Offence of Contravening Apprehended Violence Order (1) A person who knowingly contravenes a prohibition or restriction specified in an apprehended violence order made against the person is guilty of an offence. Maximum penalty: Imprisonment for 2 years or 50 penalty units, or both. |
|
Information from client |
Tyson is 39 years old. He and Charlotte have been married for 16 years, and started dating when they were 14 years old. They have 3 children aged 13, 9 and 6. When Charlotte and Tyson separated, the children stayed with Charlotte. Despite the AVO, Charlotte and Tyson have been contacting each other regularly so that the children can spend time with Tyson too. Charlotte has initiated many of these phone calls. On one occasion in the past week, Charlotte and Tyson have spent the night together and had sex. Tyson is currently “couch surfing” and staying with various friends. He works in the local abattoir and works shift work. Up until 12 months ago, he was working as a miner until he was retrenched when the mine closed. He has taken a significant pay cut which has caused stress in his marriage. |