Uncategorized
Wk 5
Create a 1-page outline of the important considerations that should be made when planning and executing an organization’s downsizing.
Rubic_Print_Format
Course Code | Class Code | Assignment Title | Total Points | |||||
HRM-640 | HRM-640-O500 | Planning and Executing Downsizing Outline | 150.0 | |||||
Criteria | Percentage | Unsatisfactory (0.00%) | Less than Satisfactory (74.00%) | Satisfactory (79.00%) | Good (87.00%) | Excellent (100.00%) | Comments | Points Earned |
Content | 100.0% | |||||||
Organizational Considerations When Planning or Executing Downsizing | 40.0% | No organizational considerations are present. | Organizational considerations are incomplete or omit some requirements stated in the assignment criteria. | Organizational considerations are complete, but are somewhat inaccurate or partially relevant. | Organizational considerations are complete, accurate, and relevant. | Organizational considerations are comprehensive, accurate, and clearly provide purpose and facts. | ||
Research | 20.0% | No outside sources are used to support the assignment. | Few outside sources are used to support the assignment. Limited research is apparent. | Research is adequate. Sources are standard in relevance, quality of outside sources, or timeliness. | Research is timely and relevant, and addresses all of the issues stated in the assignment criteria. | Research is supportive of the rationale presented. Sources are distinctive. Research addresses all of the issues stated in the assignment criteria. | ||
Concepts | Main concept is not clearly identified, and subconcepts do not consistently branch from the main idea. | Main concept is not clearly identified, and few subconcepts branch appropriately. Limited understanding of assignment is apparent. | Main concept is easily identified, and few subconcepts branch from the main idea. Only a basic understanding of assignment is present. | Main concept is easily identified and most subconcepts branch from the main idea. An original and creative concept fulfills the parameters of assignment. | Main concept is easily identified, and subconcepts branch appropriately from the main idea. Projects exhibit the process of creative thinking and the development of an individual style. | |||
Originality | 10.0% | The work is an extensive collection and rehash of the ideas, products, images, or inventions of other people. There is no evidence of new thought or inventiveness. | The work is a minimal collection or rehash of the ideas, products, images, or inventions of other people. There is no evidence of new thought. | The product shows evidence of originality. While based on the ideas, products, images, or inventions of other people, the work does offer some new insights. | The product shows evidence of originality and inventiveness. While based somewhat on the ideas, products, images, or inventions of other people, the work extends beyond that collection to offer new insights. | The product shows significant evidence of originality and inventiveness. The majority of the content and many of the ideas are fresh, original, inventive, and based upon logical conclusions and sound research. | ||
Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, and language use) | Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction is employed. | Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register) or word choice are present. Sentence structure is correct but not varied. | Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct and varied sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are employed. | Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. The writer uses a variety of effective sentence structures and figures of speech. | The writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English. | |||
Total Weightage | 100% |