Identifying 10 Strategic Points
Directions:
After reading and highlighting the components of the article, complete the 10 Strategic Points table (PSY-850.R.Identify10StrategicPoints x) based on the Clark and Springer (2007) study from Nursing Education Perspectives.
College of Doctoral Studies
RES-855 Resource
10 Strategic Points
Comments or Feedback
Broad Topic Area
Lit Review
Problem Statement
“This study was conducted using quantitative and qualitative methodologies to investigate the problem of incivility in nursing education in a university environment from both student and faculty perspectives” (p. 94).
Rewrite this in “GCU” format.
Research Questions
Sample
Sample: identify the sample from the Clark and Springer study.
Describe Phenomena (Qualitative)
Methodology and Design
Purpose Statement
“Its purpose was to consider possible causes of incivility and to recommend potential remedies” (p.94)
Rewrite this purpose statement based on “GCU” format.
Data Collection Instruments and Approach
Describe instruments used for the Clark and Springer study.
Describe the data collection approach used in the Clark and Springer study along with informed consent procedures.
Data Analysis Approach
Discuss the data analysis approach used in the Clark and Springer study.
© 2013. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.
Rubic_Print_
Format
| Course Code | Class Code | Assignment Title | Total Points | ||||||
| RES-855 | RES-855-O500 | Identifying 10 Strategic Points | 200.0 | ||||||
| Criteria | Percentage | Unsatisfactory (0.00%) | Less Than Satisfactory (74.00%) | Satisfactory (79.00%) | Good (87.00%) | Excellent (100.00%) | Comments | Points Earned | |
| Content | 70.0% | ||||||||
| Identify the 10 Strategic Points of the Clark and Springer article. | 2 | 5.0% | All 10 points have not been identified. Discussion is not present. | Not all 10 points have been identified. Discussion is incomplete. | All 10 points have been identified. Discussion is done at a perfunctory level. | All 10 points have been identified. Discussion is detailed and mostly comprehensive. | All 10 points have been identified. Discussion is thorough and comprehensive. | ||
| Include Problem and Purpose Statement | Problem and purpose statement are not present. | Problem and purpose statement are present, but incomplete. | Problem and purpose statement are present, but done at a perfunctory level. | Problem and purpose statement are present. Statements are detailed. | Problem and purpose statement are present. Statements are comprehensive and astutely identified. | ||||
| Describe Phenomena | 20.0% | The phenomena discussed by Clark and Springer has not been identified. | The phenomena discussed by Clark and Springer has been identified, but is incomplete. | The phenomena discussed by Clark and Springer has been identified, but at a perfunctory level. | The phenomena discussed by Clark and Springer has been identified and discussion is detailed. | The phenomena discussed by Clark and Springer has been identified and discussion is thorough and comprehensive. | |||
| Organization and Effectiveness | |||||||||
| Thesis Development and Purpose | Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim. | Thesis and/or main claim are insufficiently developed and/or vague; purpose is not clear. | Thesis and/or main claim are apparent and appropriate to purpose. | Thesis and/or main claim are clear and forecast the development of the paper. They are descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose. | Thesis and/or main claim are clear and comprehensive; the essence of the paper is contained within the thesis. The development indicated by the thesis and/or main claim is acceptable for publication. | ||||
| 10.0% | |||||||||
| Mechanics of Writing | Mechanical errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice and/or sentence construction are used. | Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register), sentence structure, and/or word choice are present. | Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are used. | Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. A variety of sentence structures and effective figures of speech are used. | Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English. | ||||
| APA Format | Required format is rarely followed correctly. An appropriate number of topic-related scholarly research sources and related in-text citations is not present. No reference page is included. No citations are used. | Required format is attempted, but some elements are missing or mistaken. A lack of control with formatting is apparent. Some included sources are not scholarly research or topic-related. Reference page is present. Citations are inconsistently used. | Required format is used correctly, although some minor errors may be present. Scholarly research sources are present and topic-related, but the source and quality of some references is questionable. Reference page is included and lists sources used in the paper. Sources are appropriately documented, although some errors may be present. | Required format is fully used. There are virtually no errors in formatting style. Scholarly research accounts for the majority of sources presented and is topic-related and obtained from reputable professional sources. Reference page is present and fully inclusive of all cited sources. Documentation is appropriate and citation style is usually correct. | The document is correctly formatted to publication standards. All research presented is scholarly, topic-related, and obtained from highly respected, professional, original sources. In-text citations and a reference page are complete and correct. The documentation of cited sources is free of error. The paper could readily be accepted for publication. | ||||
| Total Weightage | 100% |