Government Subject
Please do at least 1000 word. I have attached my assignment in a word document.
Module 3 Essay Question: The Theory & Practice of Representation
(Social & Personal Responsibility Assignment)
Please note that this assignment is structured differently from others in this course. You must complete all steps for the assignment to be complete.
Step 1:
Familiarize yourself with the video found here:
Who Leads Us? video on YouTube
AND the website associated with the video, located here:
Who Leads Us? Project website
AND the website of your Senator in the Texas Senate:
The Texas Senate Online
OR the website of your Representative in the Texas House:
The Texas House of Representatives Online
Step 2:
After learning about Reflective Democracy across the United States it is time to learn about how it affects you. Begin by examining yourself and your surrounding community. How would you describe your cultural background? How would you describe the cultural background of your Texas Senator/Representative? How would you describe the cultural background of the district that he or she represents (and that you are a part of)? Compare and contrast the culture of the district to the culture of your Senator/Representative. Compare and contrast the culture of your Senator/Representative and your culture. Compare and contrast your culture with the culture of the district that you live. Where do you see the greatest differences between cultures? What are some advantages and disadvantages of these cultural differences? How would you work to bridge the divide between cultures? (SR 1)
Step 3:
Find a policy issue that your Texas Senator/Representative has taken a stand on. Explain that issue in detail. Once you have explained the issue, provide information on where your representative stands on the issue. Where do you stand on the issue? What do you believe should be done? What might be another alternative solution? Thinking about your ideas on the issue who might object to your viewpoint and what might their objections be? Once you’ve laid out their objections, respond to them, and explain, with logic, why your perspective is correct and your opponents’ objections are mistaken. (PR 1 and PR 2)
Step 4:
Now that you have officially staked out a policy position, you need to think about how to get it put into action. Who in the government, and who in your community. do you believe should be involved? What specific actions should you (and those in the community) take? Why is it important to get your community involved and what will be the benefits of activating people to the cause? (SR 2)
Step 5:
Let’s assume that you are successful in your efforts, and you achieve your policy goal. What do you believe will be the consequences of putting this policy into practice? How far reaching do you think the consequences will be for your community? Your state? Your country? What do you think will be the effects over the short term? Over the long term? Be sure to mention both positive and negative consequences that might result? (PR 3)
Scoring Rubrics
Written Assignments
Working Drafts
Working Drafts are to be scored quantitatively and algorithmically, using a combination of percentage progress toward minimum word length, SafeAssign percentages and Originality Reports. Here is the algorithm used:
1. Check SafeAssign percentage.
Standard for full credit: Maximum SafeAssign percentage = 30% unoriginal content.
a. If SafeAssign percentage <30%, do not apply Adjustment. Proceed to Step 2.
b. If SafeAssign percentage > 30%, Check Originality Report.
If source is a previous draft from the same student submitting the draft, proceed to Step 2.
If source is not a previous draft from the same student, adjust Word Count for each percentage over 30% using the following formula:
(100-SafeAssign percentage score/70) = Adjustment
2. Check Word Count.
Standard for full credit = 1000 words minimum.
If Word Count >1000, then enter 1000 for Word Count.
3. Apply Adjustment.
Apply Adjustment to Word Count using the following formula:
(Word Count X Adjustment)/100 = Score.
100 adjusted words = 1 point. Maximum score=10 points, decimals allowed, round to nearest tenth.
Final Revisions
Final Revisions are to be scored using a Rubric based on the Universal Intellectual Standards described by the Foundation for Critical Thinking. This Rubric is defined as follows:
Criterion
Associated Questions
Score if no question asked
Score if one Question asked
Score if two or more Questions asked
Clarity
What do you mean?
1
0
0
Relevance
How is this related to that?
1
0
0
Accuracy
Is that true?
How do you know?
According to whom?
1
0
0
Precision
For example? What specifically do you mean?
1
0
0
Logic
Does this follow from that?
Does this make sense?
2
1
0
Breadth
Is there another way to look at this? How would this look from a ___ perspective?
1
0
0
Depth
What makes this difficult? What makes this complicated?
1
0
0
Significance
Is that the most important point?
1
0
0
Fairness
What’s your angle? Where is your interest in this? Are you being fair to X?
1
0
0
Total Possible Score
10