Saudi Aramco a comprehensive Change Management Process

 

The final critical thinking assignment for this course requires a comprehensive Change Management Process, including its origination and implementation. To complete this project, address the following:

• write about Saudi Aramco i. Provide a brief description of the organization, including its history, number of employees, products/services, mission/vision, strategies, etc.
• Discuss the problem or issue confronting the organization. Why is there a need to change (e.g., falling profits, low morale, challenges recruiting talented employees, etc.)?
• Assess the principle reasons for the organization’s problem or issue. What is the root cause and what are other causes of the problem/issue?
• Identify the intended change you propose for the organization. Detail the reasons for the change, including any research you conducted that led you to this recommendation (for instance, similar organizations in a similar situation followed this strategy, or studies indicated this was the preferred solution for other organizations in a similar situation).
• Identify a plan to implement the change. Be clear about the steps or processes that you propose to implement this change, including any resources which may be needed throughout the process.
• Identify the measurement/control mechanisms you would utilize to determine if the change management process is working effectively. Also, include any contingency plans you would propose if/when the plan is not implemented as intended.
• Finally, offer a brief statement about what you learned from completing this project and how your research in this course has affected your perspective/perception of change.

Your well-written paper should meet the following requirements:

• Be 6-8 pages in length, which does not include the title page and reference pages, which are never a part of the content minimum requirements.
• Include the references page  
• Support your submission with course material concepts, principles, and theories from the textbook and at least four scholarly, peer-reviewed journal articles.
• It is strongly encouraged that you submit all assignments into the Turnitin Originality Check prior to submitting it to your instructor for grading. If you are unsure how to submit an assignment into the Originality Check tool, review the Turnitin Originality Check – Student Guide for step-by-step instructions.
• Review the grading rubric to see how you will be graded for this assignment.

MGT521

Critical Thinking Writing Rubric – Module 12

Exceeds
Expectation

Meets Expectation Below Expectation Limited Evidence

Content, Research, and Analysis
25-30 Points 19-24 Points 13-18 Points 7-12 Points
Requirements Includes all of the

required
components, as
specified in the
assignment.

Includes most of
the required
components, as
specified in the
assignment.

Includes some of
the required
components, as
specified in the
assignment.

Includes few of the
required
components, as
specified in the
assignment.

29-35 Points 22-28 Points 15-21 Points 8-14 Points
Content Demonstrates

substantial and
extensive
knowledge of the
materials, with no
errors or major
omissions.

Demonstrates
adequate
knowledge of the
materials; may
include some
minor errors or
omissions.

Demonstrates fair
knowledge of the
materials and/or
includes some
major errors or
omissions.

Fails to
demonstrate
knowledge of the
materials and/or
includes many
major errors or
omissions.

37-45 Points 28-36 Points 19-27 Points 10-18 Points
Analysis Provides strong

thought, insight,
and analysis of
concepts and
applications.

Provides adequate
thought, insight,
and analysis of
concepts and
applications.

Provides poor
though, insight,
and analysis of
concepts and
applications.

Provides little or no
thought, insight,
and analysis of
concepts and
applications.

13-15 Points 10-12 Points 7-9 Points 4-6 Points
Sources Sources go above

and beyond
required criteria
and are well
chosen to provide
effective
substance and
perspectives on
the issue under
examination.

Sources meet
required criteria
and are adequately
chosen to provide
substance and
perspectives on the
issue under
examination.

Sources meet
required criteria
but are poorly
chosen to provide
substance and
perspectives on the
issue under
examination.

Source selection
and integration of
knowledge from
the course is
clearly deficient.

MGT521
Critical Thinking Writing Rubric – Module 12

Mechanics and Writing
5 Points 4 Points 3 Points 1-2 Points
Demonstrates
college-level
proficiency in
organization,
grammar and
style.

Project is clearly
organized, well
written, and in
proper format as
outlined in the
assignment. Strong
sentence and
paragraph
structure, contains
no errors in
grammar, spelling,
APA style, or APA
citations and
references.

Project is fairly well
organized and
written and is in
proper format as
outlined in the
assignment.
Reasonably good
sentence and
paragraph
structure, may
include a few
minor errors in
grammar, spelling,
APA style, or APA
citations and
references.

Project is poorly
organized and
written and may
not follow proper
format as outlined
in the assignment.
Inconsistent to
inadequate
sentence and
paragraph
development,
and/or includes
numerous or major
errors in grammar,
spelling, APA style,
or APA citations
and references.

Project is not
organized or well
written and is not
in proper format as
outlined in the
assignment. Poor
quality work;
unacceptable in
terms of grammar,
spelling, APA style,
and APA citations
and references.

Total points possible = 130