english

Answer the following questions

1.  Do you agree or disagree with article and why?

2.  What will you incorporate in your nursing practice after reading this article?

Attached is the article.

PCM-D-16-00017_LR 161PCM-D-16-00017_LR 161 13/05/16 11:41 PM13/05/16 11:41 PM

Editorial

The Evolution of Ethics

Suzanne K. Powell , RN, MBA, CCM, CPHQ

A B S T R A C T
Ethical issues and dilemmas span from conception to the grave. The interconnectedness of advocacy, ethics,
and end of life/death with dignity are woven into this issue of the Professional Case Management journal. Case
management is a critical member of the team when these discussions arise. And knowledge of the issues, along
with legal, ethical, and professional codes, is highlighted.

Key words: advocacy , case management , death with dignity , end of life , ethics , professional codes

Ethical issues shift as society, technology, and profession-
al practice patterns change. Step back in time to 1950.
Few of the prominent ethical issues of today were dis-
cussed: abortion, euthanasia (doctor-assisted suicide),
genetic experimentation, or rationing of healthcare. At
the time genetic research was not far enough advanced to
cause major concern, and healthcare was basic enough—
with little high-tech equipment—to be affordable. The
1950 American Nurses Association (ANA) code stated
that a nurse’s obligation was to carry out the physician’s
order and to protect the physician’s reputation. This
code left little motivation for a nurse to assess an ethical
dilemma….

( Powell, 1996 , p. 169)

This was an excerpt from my first book on case
management, written in the mid-1990s about the
1950s. Many of the 1990s ethical issues are still
pertinent today: withholding/withdrawing of care,
rationing of health care (a headliner just last week
in 2016), choice of who gets precious organs for
transplantation, patient preferences versus self-
determination, or futility of care. But ethical issues
have certainly evolved … and this is what the July/
August 2016 Professional Case Management ( PCM )
journal is all about.

The rapid advancement of technology has not
only caused true help in health care but also carved
out new ethical dilemmas—some of which are cur-
rently evolving. A few of the recent headliners include:

The editor reports no confl icts of interest.

DOI: 10.1097/NCM.0000000000000167

• DNA/genetic and stem cell advances, modifying
human embryos (“editing” embryos or “cut
and pasting” genetic material)

• digital pill (you take it, your doctor knows you
took it, or vice versa)

• high cost of medications (and rationing those
medications)

• physician-assisted suicide
• The future ability of three-dimensional (3D)

printers to build/replace human organs

What? 3D printing technology for replacement
organs? I haven’t even gotten used to the “personal
pig” idea, which I first heard about in the 1990s (and
porcine heart valves have been around for decades).
But in a sense, that concept is still a reality. According
to a study published in October 2015, scientists are
one step closer to using animals as organ donors for
humans in need. Although the study did not demon-
strate safe organs, it showcased a new gene-editing
technique that brings us closer to the “animal to
human transplant” trajectory by removing harmful
retrovirus.

The researchers used a gene editing technique called

CRISPR-Cas9 (more commonly referred to as CRISPR).

CRISPR uses the natural defense mechanisms of bac-

teria to target specific pieces of DNA in a genome, al-

lowing scientists to essentially crop out—and potentially

replace—individual sequences. (Feltman, 2015, p. 1)

The Personal Pig story may be a little humorous
(even silly today), but few things are more deeply
serious than the completion of someone’s end-of-life

Vol. 21/No. 4 Professional Case Management 161

Copyright © 2016 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. Unauthorized reproduction of this article is prohibited.

PCM-D-16-00017_LR 162PCM-D-16-00017_LR 162 13/05/16 11:41 PM13/05/16 11:41 PM

Editorial

(EOL) wishes. As case managers, we will be in situa-
tions where EOL discussions will be the most impor-
tant “task” of the day. And these may come up as
work-related or personal stories. I have two personal
ones where the wishes were not adhered to. One was
the husband who died in the hospital (no autopsy was
legally required). The wife did not believe in autop-
sies, yet one was done. I was there when she was told
about it; I will never forget the cry of anguish (and
this happened over 35 years ago).

A second one—also in the 1970s—was a favorite
uncle. He put his wishes on a cassette tape. It was
months after his sudden death that the family lis-
tened to this. Months followed where they consid-
ered exhuming the body to give him his fi nal wishes;
it was heart-wrenching for the family. It still haunts
his daughter to this day.

This issue has much about the topic of Ethics.
The premise for the article, “Essentials in Advocacy
Revisited,” was first written in this journal in 2005.
Even though I had deemed it a “classic” among man-
uscripts, Dr Tahan has graciously updated it. And the
update warranted a two-part article.

“The Evolution of End-of-Life Care: Ethical
Implications for Case Management,” by Fink-Samnik,
is another thoughtful and timely article in this issue,
demonstrating the evolution of the death-with-dignity
movement and the legislation and ethical implications
that connect with these topics.

“Case Management Ethics: High Professional
Standards for Health Care’s Interconnected World,”
by Sminkey and LeDoux, discusses the codes of profes-
sional conduct and the two worlds case managers live in.

New guidelines for continuing education units
(CEUs) in many case management certifi cations and
licensures require ethics-related CEUs. There is both
opportunity and knowledge in this issue of the PCM
journal. I have said in previous texts that there is no
answer at the back of a book on ethics. It is a pro-
cess where all the impacted people must get together
and make the best choice(s) possible, with the given
circumstances. Technology isn’t good or bad. And it
isn’t the knowledge we have, but what we do with the
knowledge that catapults it into the “ethical” realm.
Therein lies the criticality of case management when
we assist in these cases.

REFERENCES
Feltman , R. ( 2015 , October 13). Gene editing could make

pig-to-human organ transplants a reality. Retrieved
April 3, 2016, from https:// www.washingtonpost.
com/news/speaking-of-science/wp/2015/10/13/gene-
editing-could-make-pig-to-human-organ-transplants-
a-reality

Powell , S. P. ( 1996 ). Nursing case management: A practi-
cal guide to success in managed care. Philadelphia, PA:
Lippincott-Raven .

162 Professional Case Management Vol. 21/No. 4

Copyright © 2016 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. Unauthorized reproduction of this article is prohibited.

www.washingtonpost