Project Initiation, Planning and Execution

word count:- 1500

Save Time On Research and Writing
Hire a Pro to Write You a 100% Plagiarism-Free Paper.
Get My Paper

STYLE1500 words

AssessmentInformation

COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA Copyright Regulations 1969
This material has been reproduced and communicated to you by or on behalf of Kaplan Business School pursuant to Part VB of the Copyright Act 1968 (‘Act’). The material in this communication may be subject to copyright under the Act. Any
further reproduction or communication of this material by you may be the subject of copyright protection under the Act. Kaplan Business School is a part of Kaplan Inc., a leading global provider of educational services. Kaplan Business School
Pty Ltd ABN 86 098 181 947 is a registered higher education provider CRICOS Provider Code 02426B.

Save Time On Research and Writing
Hire a Pro to Write You a 100% Plagiarism-Free Paper.
Get My Paper

Assessment 2 Information

Subject Code: MBA642
Subject Name: Project Initiation, Planning and Execution
Assessment Title Project Performance
Assessment Type:
Length:

Individual Presentation
8 slides (no more)

Weighting: 30%
Total Marks:
Submission:

100
Online via Turnitin

Due Date: Week 10
.

Your task
Evaluate project performance in the initiation, planning and execution stages, utilising project management
software.

Assessment Description.
In this individual assessment, students will be given an opportunity to evaluate project management software
for overall project performance and compliance with quality standards.

Assessment Instructions

• Evaluate 5 current project management software options and explain the benefits and shortcomings of
each.

• Explain how the software addresses the requirements of the 3 stages of a project plan, as stated in the
brief above.

• Use screenshots of the software examples you have chosen to assist in explaining your opinions.
• Prepare slides as if presenting, although you will only be handing in a presentation. Place your full set

of notes in the ‘notes’ areas relevant to your slide headings. 2,000 words.
• There will be additional information which gives a fuller description of the assessment requirements

along with KBS presentation guidelines. This will be posted on the myKBS Assessment page.
• Please refer to the assessment marking guide to assist you in completing all the assessment criteria.

You are required to use at least 12 sources of information and reference these in accordance with
Kaplan Harvard Referencing Style. These may include websites, government publications, industry reports,
census data, journal articles, and newspaper articles. These references should be presented as a reference
list at the end of your presentation.

Assessment Information

COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA Copyright Regulations 1969
This material has been reproduced and communicated to you by or on behalf of Kaplan Business School pursuant to Part VB of the Copyright Act 1968 (‘Act’). The material in this communication may be subject to copyright under the Act. Any
further reproduction or communication of this material by you may be the subject of copyright protection under the Act. Kaplan Business School is a part of Kaplan Inc., a leading global provider of educational services. Kaplan Business School
Pty Ltd ABN 86 098 181 947 is a registered higher education provider CRICOS Provider Code 02426B.

Assignment Submission
This file must be submitted as a ‘PPT’ document to avoid any technical issues that may occur from incorrect
file format upload. Uploaded files with a virus will not be considered as a legitimate submission. Turnitin will
notify you if there is an issue with the submitted file. In this case, you must contact your workshop facilitator
via email and provide a brief description of the issue and a screenshot of the Turnitin error message. You are
also encouraged to submit your work well in advance of the deadline to avoid any possible delay with the
Turnitin similarity report or any other technical difficulties.

Late assignment submission penalties
Penalties will be imposed on late assignment submissions in accordance with Kaplan Business School “late
assignment submission penalties” policy.

Number of
days

Penalty

1* – 9 days 5% per day for each calendar day late deducted from the total
marks available

10 – 14 days 50% deducted from the total marks available.
After 14 days Assignments that are submitted more than 14 calendar days after

the due date will not be accepted, and the student will receive a
mark of zero for the assignment(s).

Note Notwithstanding the above penalty rules, assignments will also be
given a mark of zero if they are submitted after assignments have
been returned to students

*Assignments submitted at any stage within the first 24 hours after the deadline will be considered to be one day
late and therefore subject to the associated penalty

For more information, please read the full policy via https://www.kbs.edu.au/wp-
content/uploads/2019/07/KBS_Assessment-Policy_June-2019_Final

https://www.kbs.edu.au/wp-content/uploads/2019/07/KBS_Assessment-Policy_June-2019_Final

https://www.kbs.edu.au/wp-content/uploads/2019/07/KBS_Assessment-Policy_June-2019_Final

Assessment Information
COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA Copyright Regulations 1969
This material has been reproduced and communicated to you by or on behalf of Kaplan Business School pursuant to Part VB of the Copyright Act 1968 (‘Act’). The material in this communication may be subject to copyright under the Act. Any
further reproduction or communication of this material by you may be the subject of copyright protection under the Act. Kaplan Business School is a part of Kaplan Inc., a leading global provider of educational services. Kaplan Business School
Pty Ltd ABN 86 098 181 947 is a registered higher education provider CRICOS Provider Code 02426B.

Important Study Information

Academic Integrity Policy

KBS values academic integrity. All students must understand the meaning and consequences of
cheating, plagiarism and other academic offences under the Academic Integrity and Conduct Policy.

What is academic integrity and misconduct?
What are the penalties for academic misconduct?
What are the late penalties?
How can I appeal my grade?

Click here for answers to these questions:
http://www.kbs.edu.au/current-students/student-policies/.

Word Limits for Written Assessments

Submissions that exceed the time limit by more than 10% will cease to be marked from the point at
which that limit is exceeded.

Study Assistance

Students may seek study assistance from their local Academic Learning Advisor or refer to the
resources on the MyKBS Academic Success Centre page. Click here for this information.

http://www.kbs.edu.au/current-students/student-policies/

https://elearning.kbs.edu.au/course/view.php?id=1481

COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA Copyright Regulations 1969
This material has been reproduced and communicated to you by or on behalf of Kaplan Business School pursuant to Part VB of the Copyright Act 1968 (‘Act’). The material in this communication may be subject to copyright under the Act. Any further
reproduction or communication of this material by you may be the subject of copyright protection under the Act. Kaplan Business School is a part of Kaplan Inc., a leading global provider of educational services. Kaplan Business School Pty Ltd ABN 86
098 181 947 is a registered higher education provider CRICOS Provider Code 02426B.

MBA642 Assessment Marking Rubric – Individual Presentation 30%

Marking
Criteria

F (Fail)
0 – 49%

P (Pass)
50 – 64%

C (Credit)
65 – 74%

D (Distinction)
75 – 84%

HD (High Distinction)
85 -100%

Analysis of Positive
Software Features

__/20 marks

The analysis does not move
beyond a description of the

learning experience.

Attempts to analyse positive
features but these are vague

and unclear.

Analyses several of the positive
features and makes several

connections to how the

learning

can be applied.

Analyses many of the positive
features and makes many

connections to how the learning
can be applied

There is an in-depth analysis of
the positive features and the
value of

the derived learning.

Analysis of
Shortcoming

__/20 marks

The analysis does not move
beyond a description of the
learning experience.

Attempts to analyse
shortcomings, but these are

vague and unclear.

Analyses several shortcomings
and makes connections to how

the learning can be applied.

Analyses many shortcomings and
makes connections to applying the

learning

There is an in-depth analysis of
shortcomings and the value of

the derived learning.

Visual presentation

__/20 marks

Not all material is relevant
and/or is disorganised, lacks

structure or impact

Material presented is
relevant but lacks structure

or visual impact

Material included is relevant to
the topic and has been

structured. The visual aspect is
limited

Material is carefully structured with
a clear message and visual effect

Material is imaginatively
presented resulting in clarity of

message

Structure and
Formatting.

__/20 marks

The writing style is unclear;
lacks logical flow and structure;

numerous spelling and
grammatical

errors.

Writing style lacks clarity,
flaws in flow and structure,

some use of academic
language, several spelling or

grammatical errors

The writing style is mostly clear;
Mostly written in discipline-

specific academic language;
Some spelling or grammatical

errors.

The writing style is clear; Correct
use of discipline-specific academic
language: some minor spelling or

grammatical errors.

The writing style is clear; Fluent
use of discipline-specific

academic language: no spelling
or grammatical errors.

Theory,
research and
referencing

__/20 marks

Total marks
__/100

Many errors in logical flow and
structure, argument sourced
from non-academic literature.
No discussion of academic

research. Cites very few

sources.

Some errors in logical flow
and structure, basic

discussion of relevant theory
sourced from a minimal

number of academic
sources. Little discussion of

relevant research.

Sound logical flow and
structure, a broad discussion of

relevant theory sourced from
academic literature. Relevant

research acknowledged but not
discussed. Cites several

sources.

Good logical flow and structure, an
argument supported by detailed

relevant theory and
research sourced from numerous

and varied
academic sources.

Excellent logical flow and
structure, an argument supported
by a comprehensive discussion
of relevant theory and research

sourced from numerous and
varied academic sources.

Feedback and grades will be released via Turnitin.

Calculate your order
Pages (275 words)
Standard price: $0.00
Client Reviews
4.9
Sitejabber
4.6
Trustpilot
4.8
Our Guarantees
100% Confidentiality
Information about customers is confidential and never disclosed to third parties.
Original Writing
We complete all papers from scratch. You can get a plagiarism report.
Timely Delivery
No missed deadlines – 97% of assignments are completed in time.
Money Back
If you're confident that a writer didn't follow your order details, ask for a refund.

Calculate the price of your order

You will get a personal manager and a discount.
We'll send you the first draft for approval by at
Total price:
$0.00
Power up Your Academic Success with the
Team of Professionals. We’ve Got Your Back.
Power up Your Study Success with Experts We’ve Got Your Back.

Order your essay today and save 30% with the discount code ESSAYHELP