7-2 Final Project Milestone Three: Implementation of Performance Initiative
Instructions
Submit Milestone Three.
For additional details, please refer to the
Milestone Three Guidelines and Rubric
document and the
Final Project Guidelines and Rubric
document. You will be submitting a one to two page paper that meets the listed requirements.
IHP 430 Milestone Three Guidelines and Rubric
In the final phase of this project, you will implement your performance improvement initiative. Additionally, you will discuss what success of the performance
improvement plan will look like after implementation. If you chose a problem in your workplace, be sure to utilize data from that healthcare organization; if you
have created a hypothetical healthcare organization, you may use a public domain database with instructor permission. As this is a scholarly initiative, this
assignment must adhere to all APA requirements and formatting, and include peer-reviewed and evidence-based sources to support any and all claims. As you
develop this final part of the assignment, consider the following prompts to formulate your paper.
V. Success of the Performance Improvement Plan
A. If this initiative is successful, what would be the financial implications for the healthcare organization?
B. How would the existing information management systems contribute to the success of your proposal?
C. What organizational processes will permit continued viability of the performance improvement initiative, if it is successful?
D. Analyze interdepartmental communication that would be necessary for continued engagement in the proposed initiative.
Guidelines for Submission: This paper should be one to two pages in length, not including the cover page or reference page. Use APA format for the reference list and
all internal citations.
Critical Elements Exemplary (100%) Proficient (80%) Needs Improvement (70%) Not Evident (0%) Value
Success: Financial Meets “Proficient” criteria and
offers reasoning pertaining to
the hypothetical financial
implications for the healthcare
organization if this initiative is
successful
Comprehensively describes the
hypothetical financial
implications for the healthcare
organization if this initiative is
successful
Describes the hypothetical
financial implications for the
healthcare organization if this
initiative is successful, but
description is cursory
Does not describe the
hypothetical financial
implications for the healthcare
organization if this initiative is
successful
20
Success: Information Meets “Proficient” criteria and
hypothesis demonstrates
nuanced insight into the
relationship between
information management
systems and performance
improvement initiatives
Logically hypothesizes how the
existing information
management systems would
contribute to the success of this
proposal
Hypothesizes how the existing
information management
systems would contribute to the
success of this proposal but
hypothesis is illogical
Does not hypothesize how the
existing information
management systems would
contribute to the success of this
proposal
20
Success: Processes Meets “Proficient” criteria and
provides nuanced insight into
the organizational processes that
will permit continued viability of
the performance improvement
initiative
Accurately describes the
organizational processes that will
permit continued viability of the
performance improvement
initiative
Describes what organizational
processes will permit continued
viability of the performance
improvement initiative but
description is inaccurate
Does not describe what
organizational processes will
permit continued viability of the
performance improvement
initiative
20
Success:
Communication
Meets “Proficient” criteria and
provides keen insight into
interdisciplinary communication
patterns typically present in a
healthcare organization
Comprehensively analyzes
interdepartmental
communication patterns that
would be necessary for ongoing
engagement in the proposed
initiative
Analyzes communication
patterns that would be
necessary for ongoing
engagement in the proposed
initiative, but patterns are not
interdepartmental or analysis is
cursory
Does not analyze
interdepartmental
communication patterns that
would be necessary for ongoing
engagement in the proposed
initiative
20
Scholarly Research Meets “Proficient” criteria by
including three or more scholarly
research articles that give in-
depth details supporting
identified interdepartmental
issue
Includes two scholarly research
articles that give in-depth details
supporting identified
interdepartmental issue
Includes some scholarly research
but does not give in-depth
support to identified
interdepartmental issue
Does not include scholarly
research
10
Articulation of
Response
Submission is free of errors
related to citations, grammar,
spelling, and syntax and is
presented in a professional and
easy-to-read format
Submission has no major errors
related to citations, grammar,
spelling, or syntax
Submission has major errors
related to citations, grammar,
spelling, or syntax that
negatively impact readability and
articulation of main ideas
Submission has critical errors
related to citations, grammar,
spelling, or syntax that prevent
understanding of ideas
10
Earned Total 100%