Statistics-Topic 6

Due in 12 hours. 

Save Time On Research and Writing
Hire a Pro to Write You a 100% Plagiarism-Free Paper.
Get My Paper

Chapter 16: 16.9, 16.10, 16.12 and 16.14

Chapter 17: 17.6, 17.7, and 17.8

Chapter 18: 18.8, 18.11, and 18.12

  • statistic
  • by Xx xx

    Save Time On Research and Writing
    Hire a Pro to Write You a 100% Plagiarism-Free Paper.
    Get My Paper

    Submission date: 16-Jan-2020 12:03AM (UTC-0500)
    Submission ID: 1231493847
    File name: Statistics-Topic6 x (29.93K)
    Word count: 2137
    Character count: 10133

    59%
    SIMILARITY INDEX

    26%
    INTERNET SOURCES

    0%
    PUBLICATIONS

    59%
    STUDENT PAPERS

    1 58%
    2 1%
    3 <1% 4 <1% 5 <1%

    Exclude quotes On

    Exclude bibliography On

    Exclude matches Off

    statistic
    ORIGINALITY REPORT

    PRIMARY SOURCES

    Submitted to Grand Canyon University
    Student Paper

    Submitted to University of Warwick
    Student Paper

    Submitted to American Public University System
    Student Paper

    Submitted to Western Governors University
    Student Paper

    www.coursehero.com
    Internet Source

      statistic
      by Xx xx
      statistic
      ORIGINALITY REPORT
      PRIMARY SOURCES

    PSY520 – Module 6

    Answer Sheet

    Submit your answers in the boxes provided. No credit will be given for responses not found in the correct answer area.

    Chapter 16:

    16.9 Given the aggression scores below for Outcome A of the sleep deprivation experiment, verify that, as suggested earlier, these mean differences shouldn’t be taken seriously by testing the null hypothesis at the .05 level of significance. Use the computation formulas for the various sums of squares and summarize results with an ANOVA table.

    Hours of Sleep Deprivation

    Zero

    Twenty-Four

    Forty-Eight

    3

    4

    2

    5

    8

    4

    7

    6

    6

    Group Mean:

    5

    6

    4

    Grand Mean: 5

    Question:

    Steps:

    Calculations or Logic:

    Answer:

    Use the computation formulas for the various sums of squares and summarize results with an ANOVA table.

    What is the research hypothesis?

    What is the null hypothesis?

    What are the degrees of freedom?

    What is the calculated ?

    What is the calculated ?

    What is the calculated ?

    What is the calculated ?

    What is the calculated ?

    What is the F?

    Complete the ANOVA table:

    Source

    SS

    df

    MS

    F Ratio

    Treatment (between)

    Error (within)

    Total

    16.10 Another psychologist conducts a sleep deprivation experiment. For reasons beyond his control, unequal numbers of subjects occupy the different groups. (Therefore, when calculating in SS between and SS within , you must adjust the denominator term, n , to reflect the unequal numbers of subjects in the group totals.)

    Hours of Sleep Deprivation

    Zero

    Twenty-Four

    Forty-Eight

    1

    4

    7

    3

    7

    12

    6

    5

    10

    2

    9

    1

    Summarize the results with an ANOVA table. You need not do a step-by-step hypothesis test procedure:

    Source

    SS

    df

    MS

    F

    Treatment (between)

    Error (within)

    Total

    If hand calculating, include formulas and calculations below. If using SPSS, include a picture, screenshot, or cut/paste of the output below.

    Question:

    Calculations or Logic:

    Answer:

    Are the results statistically significant? Yes or no?

    If appropriate, estimate the effect size with η2

    If appropriate, use Tukey’s HSD test (with for the sample size, n) to identify pairs of means that contribute to the significant F, given that , and

    What is the HSD?

    Which pairs are significant at the .05 level?

    If appropriate, estimate effect sizes with Cohen’s d.

    Indicate how all of the above results would be reported in the literature, given sample standard deviations of s0= 2.07, s24 =1.53, and s48=2.08.

    16.12 For some experiment, imagine four possible outcomes, as described in the following ANOVA table.

    A.

    Source

    SS

    df

    MS

    F

    Between

    900

    3

    300

    3

    Within

    8000

    80

    100

    Total

    8900

    83

    B.

    Source

    SS

    df

    MS

    F

    Between

    1500

    3

    500

    5

    Within

    8000

    80

    100

    Total

    9500

    83

    C.

    Source

    SS

    df

    MS

    F

    Between

    300

    3

    100

    1

    Within

    8000

    80

    100

    Total

    8300

    83

    D.

    Source

    SS

    df

    MS

    F

    Between

    300

    3

    100

    1

    Within

    400

    4

    100

    Total

    700

    7

    Question:

    Calculations or Logic:

    Answer:

    How many groups are in Outcome D?

    Assuming groups of equal size, what’s the size of each group in Out-come C?

    Which outcome(s) would cause the null hypothesis to be rejected at the .05 level of significance?

    Which outcome provides the least information about a possible treatment effect?

    Which outcome would be the least likely to stimulate additional research?

    Specify the approximate p -values for each of these outcomes.

    A

    B

    C

    D

    16.14 The F test describes the ratio of two sources of variability: that for subjects treated differently and that for subjects treated similarly. Is there any sense in which the t test for two independent groups can be viewed likewise?

    Question:

    Answer:

    Is there any sense in which the t test for two independent groups can be viewed likewise?

    Chapter 17:

    17.6 Return to the study first described in Question 16.5 on page 336, where a psychologist tests whether shy college students initiate more eye contacts with strangers because of training sessions in assertive behavior. Use the same data, but now assume that eight subjects, coded as A, B, . . . G, H, are tested repeatedly after zero, one, two, and three training sessions. (Incidentally, since the psychologist is interested in any learning or sequential effect, it would not make sense—indeed, it’s impossible, given the sequential nature of the independent variable—to counterbalance the four sessions.) The results are expressed as the observed number of eye contacts:

    WORKSHOP SESSIONS

    SUBJECT

    ZERO

    ONE

    TWO

    THREE

    TSUBJECT

    A

    1

    2

    4

    7

    14

    B

    0

    1

    2

    6

    9

    C

    0

    2

    3

    6

    11

    D

    2

    4

    6

    7

    19

    E

    3

    4

    7

    9

    23

    F

    4

    6

    8

    10

    28

    G

    2

    3

    5

    8

    18

    H

    1

    3

    5

    7

    16

    G=138

    Summarize the results with an ANOVA table. Short-circuit computational work by using the results in Question 16.5 for the SS terms, that is, SSbetween=154.12, SSwithin =132.75, and SStotal =286.87.

    Source

    SS

    df

    MS

    F

    Between

    Within

    Subject

    Error

    Total

    If hand calculating, include formulas and calculations below. If using SPSS, include a picture, screenshot, or cut/paste of the output below.

    Question:

    Calculations or Logic:

    Answer:

    Are the results statistically significant? Yes or no?

    If appropriate, estimate the effect size with η2

    If appropriate, use Tukey’s HSD test.

    What is the HSD?

    Which pairs are significant at the .05 level?

    If appropriate, estimate effect sizes with Cohen’s d.

    Compare these results with repeated measures with those in Question 16.5 for independent samples.

    17.7 Recall the experiment described in Review Question 16.11 on page 314, where errors on a driving simulator were obtained for subjects whose orange juice had been laced with controlled amounts of vodka. Now assume that repeated measures are taken across all five conditions for each of five subjects. (Assume that no lingering effects occur because sufficient time elapses between successive tests, and no order bias appears because the orders of the fi ve conditions are equalized across the five subjects.)

    DRIVING ERRORS AS A FUNCTION OF ALCOHOL CONSUMPTION (OUNCES)

    SUBJECT

    ZERO

    ONE

    TWO

    FOUR

    SIX

    TSUBJECT

    A

    1

    4

    6

    15

    20

    46

    B

    1

    3

    1

    6

    25

    36

    C

    3

    1

    2

    9

    10

    25

    D

    6

    7

    10

    17

    10

    50

    E

    4

    5

    7

    9

    9

    34

    T 15

    20

    26

    56

    74

    Summarize the results in an ANOVA table. If you did Review Question 16.11 and saved your results, you can use the known values for SSbetween , SSwithin , and SStotal to short-circuit computations.

    Source

    SS

    df

    MS

    F

    Between

    Within

    Subject

    Error

    Total

    If hand calculating, include formulas and calculations below. If using SPSS, include a picture, screenshot, or cut/paste of the output below.

    Question:

    Calculations or Logic:

    Answer:

    Are the results statistically significant? Yes or no?

    If appropriate, estimate the effect size with η2

    If appropriate, use Tukey’s HSD test.

    What is the HSD?

    Which pairs are significant at the .05 level?

    If appropriate, estimate effect sizes with Cohen’s d.

    Compare these results with repeated measures with those in Question 16.5 for independent samples.

    17.8 While analyzing data, an investigator treats each score as if it were contributed by a different subject even though, in fact, scores were repeated measures.

    Question:

    Answer:

    What effect, if any, would this mistake probably have on the F test if the null hypothesis were:

    True?

    False?

    Chapter 18:

    18.8 For the two-factor experiment described in the previous question, assume that, as shown, mean bar press rates of either 4 or 8 are identified with three of the four cells in the 2 X 2 table of outcomes.

    Food Deprivation (Hours)

    0

    24

    Reward Amount (Pellets)

    1

    8

    2

    4

    8

    Furthermore, just for the sake of this question, ignore sampling variability and assume that effects occur whenever any numerical differences correspond to either food deprivation, reward amount, or the interaction.

    Question:

    Answer?

    Indicate whether or not effects occur for each of these three components if the empty cell in the 2 X 2 table is occupied by a mean of :

    12

    Which main effects are significant?

    Is the interaction significant? (yes or no)

    8

    Which main effects are significant?

    Is the interaction significant? (yes or no)

    4

    Which main effects are significant?

    Is the interaction significant? (yes or no)

    18.11 In what sense does a two-factor ANOVA use observations more efficiently than a one-factor ANOVA does?

    Question:

    Answer:

    In what sense does a two-factor ANOVA use observations more efficiently than a one-factor ANOVA does?

    18.12 A psychologist employs a two-factor experiment to study the combined effect of sleep deprivation and alcohol consumption on the performance of automobile drivers. Before the driving test, the subjects go without sleep for various time periods and then drink a glass of orange juice laced with controlled amounts of vodka. Their performance is measured by the number of errors made on a driving simulator. Two subjects are randomly assigned to each cell, that is, each possible combination of sleep deprivation (either 0, 24, 48, or 72 hours) and alcohol consumption (either 0, 1, 2, or 3 ounces), yielding the following results:

    NUMBER OF DRIVING ERRORS

    ALCOHOL CONSUMPTION (OUNCES)

    SLEEP DEPRIVATION (HOURS)

    0

    24

    48

    72

    Trow

    0

    0

    2

    5

    5

    29

    841

    3

    4

    4

    6

    1

    1

    3

    6

    5

    36

    1296

    3

    3

    7

    8

    2

    3

    2

    8

    7

    53

    2809

    5

    5

    11

    12

    3

    4

    4

    10

    9

    68

    4624

    6

    7

    13

    15

    =1466

    Tcolumn

    25

    30

    64

    67

    G=186

    625

    900

    4096

    4489

    G2=34596

    Summarize the results with an ANOVA table.

    Source

    SS

    df

    MS

    F

    Column

    Row

    Interaction

    Within

    Total

    If hand calculating, include formulas and calculations below. If using SPSS, include a picture, screenshot, or cut/paste of the output below.

    Question:

    Calculations or Logic:

    Answer:

    Which results are statistically significant?

    If appropriate, conduct additional F tests.

    If appropriate, estimate the effect size with η2

    Column

    Row

    Interaction

    If appropriate, use Tukey’s HSD test.

    What is the HSD?

    Which pairs are significant at the .05 level?

    If appropriate, estimate effect sizes with Cohen’s d.

    Calculate your order
    Pages (275 words)
    Standard price: $0.00
    Client Reviews
    4.9
    Sitejabber
    4.6
    Trustpilot
    4.8
    Our Guarantees
    100% Confidentiality
    Information about customers is confidential and never disclosed to third parties.
    Original Writing
    We complete all papers from scratch. You can get a plagiarism report.
    Timely Delivery
    No missed deadlines – 97% of assignments are completed in time.
    Money Back
    If you're confident that a writer didn't follow your order details, ask for a refund.

    Calculate the price of your order

    You will get a personal manager and a discount.
    We'll send you the first draft for approval by at
    Total price:
    $0.00
    Power up Your Academic Success with the
    Team of Professionals. We’ve Got Your Back.
    Power up Your Study Success with Experts We’ve Got Your Back.

    Order your essay today and save 30% with the discount code ESSAYHELP