rhetorical critique response ( 600-700words)
The article is in the attachment “rhetorical critique response “
ALL instructions are in the “summary critique assignment + evaluation.” one.
Please read the instructions clearly follow all the instructions.
Don’t need any citation
MLA format
No copy or plag
ARTICLESUMMARY AND CRITIQUE ASSIGNMENT – 13%
DUE: ______________________________
Compose a summary and critique of the article provided. Your summary and critique should total 500-750 words.
FORMAT REQUIREMENTS
· All margins = 1”/2.5 cm
· Double spaced paragraphs, first line of each paragraph indented
· Title, headings (optional) and text all must be 12 pt. font Arial – title in bold, ALL CAPS and centred; headings ALL CAPS and left-margin aligned (no bold)
· Check for spelling and mechanics – grammar, punctuation, sentence structure
· Place your full name and page number in the footer – see sample
· Total length = summary + critique
CONTENT REQUIREMENTS
1. Summary – write a summary of the article that is 10-15% of the article’s length. Include the word count of your summary in the heading, i.e. Summary – 125 – 150 words.
Introduction – introduce your assignment with a full author reference, as shown.
In the article titled [article title], [author name/s] asserts [insert main message/thesis of article in your own words]
· Summarize the main message/thesis
· Summarize a minimum of 3 or 4 key supporting points
· Summarize a key example or detail for each key supporting point
2. Rhetorical critique response – Critique the same article by considering the following:
· Ensure that you include the word count of your critique in the title, i.e. Criticism – 300 – 500 words
· Analyze the article’s content by focusing on the sufficiency, relevance, and credibility of the evidence by researching to verify or refute the claims and sources that the author uses
· Does the article achieve its purpose? Why or why not? What are its strengths and weaknesses?
· Identify faulty interpretations of the evidence and details that avoid the real issue
· Draw from your own knowledge and experience for your critique
· Do some research on the author and her other works to determine her biases – does the article complement or conflict with her established bias?
· Conclude with an overall evaluation of the article – do you agree or not? What are its strengths? What is it missing/what additions would you need to be convinced?
FORMAT
· All margins = 1”/2.5 cm
· Double spaced paragraphs, first line of each paragraph indented
· Title, headings, and text all must be 12 pt. font Arial – title in bold, ALL CAPS (centred); headings bold and regular text (left-margin aligned)
· Check for spelling and mechanics – grammar, punctuation, sentence structure
· Place your full name, Student ID#, and page number in the header
ARTICLE SUMMARY AND CRITIQUE EVALUATION
|
1=not yet 2=emerging 3=developing 4=effective 5=strong |
|||
|
Summary Content · Main idea gives clear reference to title, date, author of the original article · Restated ALL of the key ideas from the original article · Summary is 10-15% of the length of the original article · Included ALL of the supporting details · Details are expressed in the same order as the article · No borrowed-from-article wording or phrasing used |
1 2 3 4 5 |
||
|
Critique · Evaluates the sufficiency, relevance, and credibility of the article content through examples from article · Reflects external research completed to verify or refute author’s claims · Identifies and provides example of each faulty interpretation and detail designed to detract reader from real issue · Includes personal knowledge and experience when evaluating article · Summarizes author’s background and bias, determines whether article content complements or conflicts with bias · Concludes with a comprehensive evaluation of the article that indicates writer’s agreement/disagreement with article, its strengths and weaknesses, indicates the type of information needed to convince writer to agree with author |
1 2 3 4 5
X 2 = |
||
|
Style and Tone · Variety of sentence structure and vocabulary · Clear and concise use of language · Consistently reflects audience needs · Language is neither too formal nor too casual |
|||
|
Format · margins · double-spacing · paragraphs indented · appropriate title (bold, centred) and headings (bold, left-margin aligned) · footer present complete on all pages |
|||
|
Grammar · sentence structure, word usage, spelling, punctuation aids/impedes understanding |
1 2 3 4 5 |
||
|
Sub-total |
/30 |
FINAL GRADE |
/15% |
Surname 2
5G’s Potential, and Why Businesses Should Start Preparing for It
A new Accenture survey of nearly 2,000 technology and business executives in 10 countries
revealed deep uncertainty
about next-generation mobile network technology, known as 5G. Few of those surveyed, for example, believe industry predictions about the dramatically
improved speeds
of 5G networks. And more than half don’t expect the technology will enable them to do much that they can’t already do. Nearly three-quarters said they need help imagining 5G use cases.
These findings suggest that many business leaders neither understand the technology nor its disruptive potential. 5G, when fully implemented, is poised to be a very big deal, a far bigger transformation in mobile technology than any previous generational shift. Its speed, capacity, and dramatically reduced power consumption and communications response times, or “latency,” will make possible an astonishing range of innovative new products and services.
The economic and social benefits
could be enormous.
5G networks rely on much smaller, but more densely-deployed, antennae, most attached not to giant cell towers but to existing buildings, light poles, and other physical infrastructure. By packing or “densifying” the network, signals will be carried faster and more reliably, with bandwidth measured not in megabits but rather in gigabits per second. Early tests suggest that 5G networks will be
as much as 100 times
faster than today’s mobile technology.
Part of the disconnect in company leaders’ perceptions is no doubt the result of early marketing, with some carriers already offering “5G” products before the full technical specification has yet to be completed. Wall Street and others have
expressed skepticism
, unsure of where the true value of 5G will come from, and who will profit from it (more on that in a moment).
In fact, these remarkable technical features will allow next-generation networks to compete head-on with wired broadband systems, including those built with today’s fastest fiber-optic technology.
More to the point, 5G’s revolutionary technology will also make possible the kind of disruptive applications that usually leave both investors and users salivating. So why the gap between 5G’s possibilities and the lack of urgency and understanding among the executives in our survey?
The answer, we think, is that much of 5G’s biggest impact will be diffused across a range of industries and user communities, making its future value both difficult to see and hard to measure.
Our forthcoming book,
Pivot to the Future
, finds that similar mismatches between the potential of new technologies and their actual, realized benefits are growing, including with artificial intelligence and quantum computing. Most senior executives we surveyed are looking at these technologies through the lens of incremental improvements to today’s business, rather than imagining how they could be used to reshape industries and, even more broadly, how they could be applied in the search for solutions to broader social problems, including the environment, poverty, and health care.
This is largely due to the limitations of conventional business thinking. When new innovations disrupt multiple industries or make possible applications that serve new groups of customers (including those who may be un- or under-served today), traditional approaches to strategy and planning underestimate their real impact, leading to delayed investment and missed opportunities.
These failures accumulate in the form of unrealized gains for enterprises, industries, consumers and society as a whole — what we call “
trapped value
.”
To take just one example, 5G networks will supercharge
the nascent Internet of Things
, where everyday devices become connected, sending and receiving data to highly-local networks and from there in secured form throughout the cloud, including to service providers and device manufacturers.
Where today’s IoT offerings, including connected doorbells and thermostats, are often simple and sometimes even gimmicky, a fully connected residence will generate tremendous benefit, especially to aging baby boomers who hope to stay in their homes as long as possible.
With sensors that monitor, and devices that assist, everything from mobility to medication, seniors
will be able to age in place
at much higher rates, and for longer. Connected robots, 3D-printed prosthetics, and tele-health services, likewise, will all play a part in the house of the future. To work together, truly smart homes will need 5G’s capacity, reliability, energy efficiency and low latency. (We’ll also need better answers to a growing list of
questions
about user data collection and use.)
That kind of use case could release tremendous trapped value we’ll all share, including the potential for reduced health care costs, improved quality of life, and more diverse and inclusive communities. But because the industries affected and the users benefiting most from these applications are so diffused, few businesses today, including the network operators themselves, can see the value gap that is growing larger every day.
To take a second example, consider the profound impact of
smart vehicles, connected roads
, and other infrastructure.
A 2017 study
by Accenture Strategy estimated that smart city applications made possible by 5G networks could create three million new jobs and contribute $500 billion to U.S. GDP over the next seven years, releasing value trapped in the form of productivity lost today to time wasted in traffic and reduced pollution from vehicles traveling
more efficiently in “platoons
.”
Those kinds of benefits, though large, are difficult to calculate in a typical strategy exercise. Even more challenging to factor in is one of the greatest hopes for smart transportation: a dramatic reduction in vehicle fatalities. In the U.S. alone, just a 10% decline in roadway deaths would
translate to
4,000 lives saved every year. While we have a way to go before autonomous driving technology is available at such a scale, that kind of positive change would impact everything from insurance to vehicle design, releasing trapped value that would be difficult to overestimate.
Beyond smart homes and cities, the speed, capacity, and reliability of 5G networks will accelerate new innovations in
equally-impressive ways
elsewhere. Agriculture, for example, could become substantially more efficient from connected sensors in the ground, drones patrolling crops, and integrated weather tracking technology. Mobile entertainment also stands to be enhanced by 5G’s speed, and in particular its reduced latency, to offer ever-higher-quality video, supplemented with new types of interactions from
augmented and virtual reality
.
There’s no shortage of predictions about the potential for 5G networks. But like many new technologies, and as our survey makes clear, there’s also
a great deal of uncertainty
about the when, how, where and who. Full 5G deployment may be five years away–maybe more
depending on how regulators and local governments
respond to both the opportunities and challenges. The applications we’ve identified may come sooner or later, along with the many that haven’t even been thought of yet.
Still, if incumbent businesses don’t pick up the pace in preparing for 5G, the resulting gaps will inevitably attract new entrants and start-ups, unleashing the kind of sudden disruptions that have unsettled mature industries including entertainment (iTunes and Netflix), transportation (Uber and Lyft), and manufacturing (3D printing), to name a few.
That’s why we recommend an aggressive but measured approach to planning for and investing in 5G today. It makes little sense for companies in affected industries (increasingly, all of them) to bet on one particular technology or application. But at the same time, the old approach of waiting for new 5G-powered markets to emerge and jumping in later as a so-called “fast follower” won’t work either.
That’s because even when disruptors are slow to gain traction, once they do, the race to profit is often over as soon as it starts. If you weren’t already warmed up and on the starting line, your chances of winning will be virtually zero.
What’s more, many of the new applications 5G technology makes possible will be nurtured by interconnected ecosystems that cross traditional supply chain and industry borders. Any hope of capturing even a fraction of the value 5G will ultimately release will require early and sustained intervention, perhaps in the form of industry consortia, along with a balanced portfolio of corporate venture funding. The time is now to begin identifying partners, and experimenting with new forms of collaboration and co-investment.
You need to keep improving on today’s business, while keeping a closer watch on how 5G markets emerge. That’s the only way to be ready to scale rapidly with new offerings as the unknowns dissolve over time.