okkkk

okkkkk

Name

Save Time On Research and Writing
Hire a Pro to Write You a 100% Plagiarism-Free Paper.
Get My Paper

Class

Date

Instructor

Clinical Field Experience –

Save Time On Research and Writing
Hire a Pro to Write You a 100% Plagiarism-Free Paper.
Get My Paper

Connection Across the Curriculum, Curricular Goals, and Community

Introduction

In your introduction, please discuss grade level you observed, class size, etc…

Curricular Goals and Cross-Curricular Connections (2 paragraphs)

Please provide a summary of curricular goals and cross-curricular connections in this first paragraph. What is the teacher’s pre-planning process? How do they ensure their lesson plan activities are aligned to state standards? What were some strategies the teacher used to establish curricular goals? How did students know what their curricular goals were? How were cross-curricular connections considered? If none were observed, discuss this with the mentor teacher.

Assessments Interview

Here you will provide a summary of how the teacher assesses his/her students. How did the teacher assess student understanding before, during, and after the lesson? How are formative and summative assessments used for instructional planning and within the classroom?

Differentiation Interview

How is instruction differentiated to meet students’ learning needs? What factors are taken into consideration when differentiating learning activities? What opportunities allow each student to demonstrate acquired knowledge and skills through a variety of products and performances? How were home extension activities determined?

Observation Summary

Please provide a thorough summary of the lesson you observed.

Conclusion

Please provide a closure. Her you can put your final thoughts and wrap up to your clinical field experience.

Aligned Learning Activities and Differentiation

 

 

Not addressed.

Not addressed.

Not addressed.

Not addressed.

Not addressed.

 

 

1
No submission
0.00%

2
Insufficient
65.00%

3
Approaching
75.00%

4
Acceptable
85.00%

5
Target
100.00%

100.0 %Criteria

25.0 %Learning Activities

Not addressed.

Learning activities are underdeveloped or poorly described or not aligned to the learning objective.

Learning activities are simple, sufficiently explained, and an attempt is made to align to the learning objective.

Learning activities are suitable, clearly explained, and logically aligned to the learning objective.

Learning activities are creative, comprehensively explained, and expertly aligned to the learning objective.

25.0 %Differentiation

Differentiation to meet each student’s learning needs is illogical and minimally explained.

Differentiation to meet each student’s learning needs is plausible and adequately explained.

Differentiation to meet each student’s learning needs is logical and explained in detail.

Differentiation to meet each student’s learning needs is innovative and thoroughly explained.

25.0 %Home Extension Activity

Home extension activity is incomplete or unrelated to demonstrating acquired knowledge and skills.

Home extension activity is sufficient to allow the student to demonstrate acquired knowledge and skills.

Home extension activity is appropriate and competently allows the student to demonstrate acquired knowledge and skills.

Home extension activity is novel and proficiently allows the student to demonstrate acquired knowledge and skills.

10.0 %Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style)

Documentation of sources is inconsistent and/or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors.

Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors are present.

Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct.

Sources are documented completely and correctly, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error.

5.0 %Originality

The work is an extensive collection and rehash of the ideas, products, images, or inventions of other people. There is no evidence of new thought or inventiveness.

The product shows some evidence of originality. While based on the ideas, products, images, or inventions of other people, the work does offer some new insights or inventiveness.

The product shows evidence of originality and inventiveness. While based somewhat on the ideas, products, images, or inventions of other people, the work extends beyond that collection to offer new insights and inventiveness.

The product shows significant evidence of originality and inventiveness. The majority of the content and many of the ideas are fresh, original, inventive, and based upon logical conclusions and sound research.

10.0 %Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, and language use)

Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction are used.

Submission includes mechanical errors, but they do not hinder comprehension. Includes some practice and content-related language.

Submission is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few minor errors are present. Includes appropriate practice and content-related language.

Submission is virtually free of mechanical errors. Word choice reflects well-developed use of practice and content-related language.

100 %Total Weightage

Class Profile

Student Name

ELL/

Proficiency Level

Socioeconomic Status

Race/ Ethnicity

Native Language

Gender

IEP/

504

Other

Age

Reading Performance Level/Score*

Math Performance Level/Score*

Arturo

Yes – 4

Low

Mexican

Spanish

Male

No

Glasses

Grade level

One year below grade level/98

At grade level/151

Bertie

Yes – 5

Low

Vietnamese

Vietnamese

Female

No

None

Grade level

One year above grade level/210

At grade level/108

Beryl

No

Mid

White

English

Female

No

None 

Grade level

Two years above grade level/268

At grade level/163

Brandie

Yes – 4

Low

Liberian

Liberian English

Female

No

None

Grade level

At grade level/178

One year below grade level/79

Dessie

Yes – 4

Mid

Russian

Russian

Female

No

None

Grade level

At grade level/113

One year below grade level/65

Diana

Yes – 4

Low

Mexican

Spanish

Female

No

None

Grade level

One year below grade level/79

At grade level/198

Donnie

No

Mid

African American

English

Female

Yes

Hearing Aids

Grade level

At grade level/150

At grade level/124

Eduardo

Yes – 5

Low

Puerto Riccan

Spanish

Male

No

Glasses

Grade level

One year below grade level/88

At grade level/101

Emma

No

Mid

White

English

Female

No

None

Grade level

At grade level/124

At grade level/135

Enrique

No

Low

Mexican

English

Male

ADHD

None

One year above grade level

One year below grade level/45

At grade level/163

Fatma

Yes – 5

Low

Mexican

Spanish

Female

No

Glasses

Grade level

One year below grade level/21

One year above grade level/289

Frances

No

Mid

Mexican

English

Female

No

Diabetic
Glasses

Grade level

At grade level/116

At grade level/114

Francesca

Yes – 5

Low

Mexican

Spanish

Female

No

None

Grade level

At grade level/162

At grade level/178

Fredrick

No

Low

White

English

Male

Learning Disabled

None

One year above grade level

Two years below grade level/285

Two years below grade level/15

Ines

Yes – 4

Low

Mexican

Spanish

Female

Learning Disabled

Glasses

Grade level

One year below grade level/50

One year below grade level/55

Jade

No

Mid

African American

English

Female

No

None

Grade level

At grade level/183

One year above grade level/224

Kent

No

High

White

English

Male

ADHD

Glasses

Grade level

At grade level/178

One year above grade level/208

Lolita

Yes – 5

Low

Navajo

Navajo

Female

No

None

Grade level

At grade level/110

At grade level/141

Maria

No

Mid

Mexican

Spanish

Female

No

NOTE: School does not have gifted program

Grade level

At grade level/139

Two years above grade level/296

Mason

Yes – 4

Low

Vietnamese

Vietnamese

Male

Yes

High Func-tioning Autism

Grade level

At grade level/154

At grade level/138

Nick

No

Low

White

English

Male

No

None

Grade level

One year above grade level/205

At grade level/180

Noah

No

Low

African American

English

Male

No

Glasses

Grade level

At grade level/193

At grade level/177

Sharlene

No

Mid

White

English

Female

No

None

Grade level

One year above grade level/110

At grade level/125

Sophia

Yes – 5

Mid

Guatamalan

Spanish

Female

No

None

Grade level

At grade level/129

At grade level/152

Stuart

No

Mid

White

English

Male

No

Allergic to peanuts

Grade level

One year above grade level/231

At grade level/116

Terrence

No

Mid

African American

English

Male

No

None

Grade level

At grade level/189

At grade level/192

Wade

No

Mid

White

English

Male

No

Glasses

Grade level

At grade level/179

One year above grade level/223

Welington

Yes – 3

Low

Cuban

Spanish

Male

Learning Disabled

Glasses

Grade level

One year below grade level/82

Two years below grade level/24

Wendell

Yes – 2

Low

Somalian Refugee

Somali

Male

No

None

Grade level

One year below grade level/51

Two years below grade level/45

Yung

Yes – 4

Low

Burmese

Burmese

Male

No

None

One year below grade level

One year below grade level/98

Two years below grade level/65

*Scaled Scores Key: Above Grade Level = 200 +, At Grade Level = 100-199, Below Grade Level = 0-99

© 2018. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.

Clinical Field Experience: Connection Across the Curriculum, Curricular Goals, and Community

 

 

Not addressed.

Not addressed.

Not addressed.

Not addressed.

 

 

1
No Submission
0.00%

2
Insufficient
65.00%

3
Approaching
75.00%

4
Acceptable 
85.00%

5
Target
100.00%

100.0 %Criteria

20.0 %Interview: Curricular Goals and Cross-Curricular Connections

Not addressed

.

Summary of curricular goals and cross-curricular connections is incomplete.

Summary of curricular goals and cross-curricular connections is basic.

Summary of curricular goals and cross-curricular connections is detailed.

Summary of curricular goals and cross-curricular connections is substantial.

20.0 %Interview: Assessments

Summary of discussion of assessments is incomplete.

Summary of discussion of assessments is basic.

Summary of discussion of assessments is detailed.

Summary of discussion of assessments is substantial.

20.0 %Interview: Differentiation

Summary of discussion of differentiation is incomplete.

Summary of discussion of differentiation is basic.

Summary of discussion of differentiation is detailed.

Summary of discussion of differentiation is substantial.

20.0 %Summary of Observation

Summary of the lesson is minimal and connections to the interview and observations are unclear.

Summary of the lesson observed is simple and basic connections to the interview and the observations are noted.

Summary of the lesson observed is detailed and logical connections to the interview and the observations are noted.

Summary of the lesson observed is thorough, and connection to the interview are insightful.

10.0 %Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use)

Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register) or word choice are present. Sentence structure is correct but not varied.

Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct and varied sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are employed.

Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. The writer uses a variety of effective sentence structures and figures of speech.

Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.

10.0 %Organization

Not addressed

An attempt is made to organize the content, but the sequence is indiscernible. The ideas presented are compartmentalized; may not relate to each other.

The content is adequately organized, generally providing the audience with a sense of the main idea.

The content is logically organized. The ideas presented relate to each other. The content provides the audience with a clear sense of the main idea.

The content is well organized and logical. There is a sequential progression of ideas related to each other. The content is presented as a cohesive unit. Provides the audience with a clear sense of the main idea.

100 %Total Weightage

Aligned Learning Activities and Differentiation

 

 

Not addressed.

Not addressed.

Not addressed.

Not addressed.

Not addressed.

 

 

1
No submission
0.00%

2
Insufficient
65.00%

3
Approaching
75.00%

4
Acceptable
85.00%

5
Target
100.00%

100.0 %Criteria

25.0 %Learning Activities

Not addressed.

Learning activities are underdeveloped or poorly described or not aligned to the learning objective.

Learning activities are simple, sufficiently explained, and an attempt is made to align to the learning objective.

Learning activities are suitable, clearly explained, and logically aligned to the learning objective.

Learning activities are creative, comprehensively explained, and expertly aligned to the learning objective.

25.0 %Differentiation

Differentiation to meet each student’s learning needs is illogical and minimally explained.

Differentiation to meet each student’s learning needs is plausible and adequately explained.

Differentiation to meet each student’s learning needs is logical and explained in detail.

Differentiation to meet each student’s learning needs is innovative and thoroughly explained.

25.0 %Home Extension Activity

Home extension activity is incomplete or unrelated to demonstrating acquired knowledge and skills.

Home extension activity is sufficient to allow the student to demonstrate acquired knowledge and skills.

Home extension activity is appropriate and competently allows the student to demonstrate acquired knowledge and skills.

Home extension activity is novel and proficiently allows the student to demonstrate acquired knowledge and skills.

10.0 %Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style)

Documentation of sources is inconsistent and/or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors.

Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors are present.

Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct.

Sources are documented completely and correctly, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error.

5.0 %Originality

The work is an extensive collection and rehash of the ideas, products, images, or inventions of other people. There is no evidence of new thought or inventiveness.

The product shows some evidence of originality. While based on the ideas, products, images, or inventions of other people, the work does offer some new insights or inventiveness.

The product shows evidence of originality and inventiveness. While based somewhat on the ideas, products, images, or inventions of other people, the work extends beyond that collection to offer new insights and inventiveness.

The product shows significant evidence of originality and inventiveness. The majority of the content and many of the ideas are fresh, original, inventive, and based upon logical conclusions and sound research.

10.0 %Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, and language use)

Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction are used.

Submission includes mechanical errors, but they do not hinder comprehension. Includes some practice and content-related language.

Submission is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few minor errors are present. Includes appropriate practice and content-related language.

Submission is virtually free of mechanical errors. Word choice reflects well-developed use of practice and content-related language.

100 %Total Weightage

Calculate your order
Pages (275 words)
Standard price: $0.00
Client Reviews
4.9
Sitejabber
4.6
Trustpilot
4.8
Our Guarantees
100% Confidentiality
Information about customers is confidential and never disclosed to third parties.
Original Writing
We complete all papers from scratch. You can get a plagiarism report.
Timely Delivery
No missed deadlines – 97% of assignments are completed in time.
Money Back
If you're confident that a writer didn't follow your order details, ask for a refund.

Calculate the price of your order

You will get a personal manager and a discount.
We'll send you the first draft for approval by at
Total price:
$0.00
Power up Your Academic Success with the
Team of Professionals. We’ve Got Your Back.
Power up Your Study Success with Experts We’ve Got Your Back.

Order your essay today and save 30% with the discount code ESSAYHELP