NC005: Rehabilitation(Criminal Justice)
Overview (Please use the attached- Written Response Submission Form )
This Written Response Assessment requires you to complete your own research in your area of interest on diversion, reentry, probation and parole, and rehabilitation treatment programs. Please note the specific requirement for each response.
Submission Length: 4 prompts-(4 responses and 1 Written Response Submission Forms) with responses ranging from 4 paragraphs in length.
NC005: Rehabilitation:
Promote diversion, reentry, probation and parole, and rehabilitation treatment programs.
Written Response Submission Form
Your Name: First and last
Your E-Mail Address: Your email here
Instructions
Write your responses where it reads, “
Enter your response here.
” Write as much as needed to satisfy the requirements indicated. Each item contains the
Rubric
Rubric
, which will be used to evaluate your responses.
At the end of the template, you will list the references you used to support your responses.
Item 1
Note: In this Assessment, you will be completing your own research in your area of interest on diversion, reentry, probation and parole, and rehabilitation treatment programs. While conducting your research you should utilize resources such as
www.crimesolutions.gov
,
www.nij.gov
,
www.nicic.gov
, and/or current government or peer-reviewed publications to support your responses.
· Provide an overview of an evidence-based diversion program. (1–2 paragraphs)
· Determine the effectiveness of an evidence-based diversion program. Include statistics and any other supporting information that demonstrate the effectiveness. (3–4 paragraphs)
Your Response
Your Response
Enter your response here.
Rubric
|
0 Not Present |
1 Needs Improvement |
2 Meets Expectations |
|||||||||||||||
|
Sub-Competency 1: Evaluate an Evidence-Based Diversion Program |
|||||||||||||||||
|
Provide an overview of an evidence-based diversion program. LO1.1: Identify an evidence-based diversion program |
Response is missing. |
Response does not clearly articulate the diversion program and/or is not an evidence-based program. Response is not supported by a current government or peer-reviewed publication. |
Response identifies an evidence-based diversion program. Response provides a clear overview of the evidence-based diversion program identified. Response is supported by a current government or peer-reviewed publication. |
||||||||||||||
|
Determine the effectiveness of an evidence-based diversion program. LO1.2: Evaluate the effectiveness of an evidence-based diversion program |
Response has fewer than two logical conclusions of why the evidence-based diversion program is or is not effective. Response does not utilize statistical data to support your argument of whether the evidence-based diversion program is effective. Response does not make a recommendation and/or argument for using or not using the evidence-based diversion program in your community. |
Response draws two logical conclusions of why the evidence-based diversion program is or is not effective. Response includes statistical data to support your argument of whether the evidence-based diversion program is effective. Response includes if you would recommend the evidence-based diversion program in your community and why. |
Item 2
· Provide an overview of an evidence-based reentry program. (1–2 paragraphs)
· Determine the effectiveness of an evidence-based reentry program. Include statistics and any other supporting information that demonstrate the effectiveness. (3–4 paragraphs)
Your Response
Enter your response here.
Rubric
|
Sub-Competency 2: Evaluate an Evidence-Based Reentry Program |
||
|
Provide an overview of an evidence-based reentry program. LO2.1: Identify an evidence-based reentry program |
Response does not clearly articulate the reentry program and/or is not an evidence-based program. Response is not supported by a current government or peer-reviewed publication. |
Response identifies an evidence-based reentry program. Response provides a clear overview of the evidence-based reentry program identified. Response is supported by a current government or peer-reviewed publication. |
|
Determine the effectiveness of an evidence-based reentry program. LO2.2: Evaluate the effectiveness of an evidence-based reentry program |
Response has fewer than two logical conclusions of why the evidence-based reentry program is or is not effective. Response does not utilize statistical data to support your argument of whether the evidence-based reentry program is effective. Response does not make a recommendation and/or argument for using or not using the evidence-based reentry program in your community. |
Response draws two logical conclusions of why the evidence-based reentry program is or is not effective. Response includes statistical data to support your argument of whether the evidence-based reentry program is effective. Response includes if you would recommend the evidence-based reentry program in your community and why. |
Item 3
· Provide an overview of an evidence-based probation or parole program. (1–2 paragraphs)
· Determine the effectiveness of an evidence-based probation or parole program. Include statistics and any other supporting information that demonstrate the effectiveness. (3–4 paragraphs)
Your Response
Enter your response here.
Rubric
|
Sub-Competency 3: Evaluate an Evidence-Based Probation or Parole Program |
||
|
Provide an overview of an evidence-based probation or parole program. LO3.1: Identify an evidence-based probation or parole program |
Response does not clearly articulate the probation or parole program and/or is not an evidence-based program. Response is not supported by a current government or peer-reviewed publication. |
Response identifies an evidence-based probation or parole program. Response provides a clear overview of the evidence-based probation or parole program identified. Response is supported by a current government or peer-reviewed publication. |
|
Determine the effectiveness of an evidence-based probation or parole program. LO3.2: Evaluate the effectiveness of an evidence-based probation or parole program |
Response has fewer than two logical conclusions of why the evidence-based probation or parole program is or is not effective. Response does not utilize statistical data to support your argument of whether the evidence-based probation or parole program is effective. Response does not make a recommendation and/or argument for using or not using the evidence-based probation or parole program in your community. |
Response draws two logical conclusions of why the evidence-based probation or parole program is or is not effective. Response includes statistical data to support your argument of whether the evidence-based probation or parole program is effective. Response includes if you would recommend the evidence-based probation or parole program in your community and why. |
Item 4
· Provide an overview of an evidence-based domestic violence offender rehabilitation treatment program. (1–2 paragraphs)
· Determine the effectiveness of an evidence-based domestic violence offender rehabilitation treatment program. Include statistics and any other supporting information that demonstrate the effectiveness. (3–4 paragraphs)
Your Response
Enter your response here.
Rubric
|
Sub-Competency 4: Evaluate an Evidence-Based Rehabilitation Treatment Program |
||
|
Provide an overview of an evidence-based domestic violence offender rehabilitation treatment program. LO4.1: Identify an evidence-based domestic violence offender rehabilitation treatment program |
Response does not clearly articulate the domestic violence offender rehabilitation treatment program and/or is not an evidence-based program. Response is not supported by a current government or peer-reviewed publication. |
Response identifies an evidence-based domestic violence offender rehabilitation treatment program. Response provides a clear overview of the evidence-based domestic violence offender rehabilitation treatment program identified. Response is supported by a current government or peer-reviewed publication. |
|
Determine the effectiveness of an evidence-based domestic violence offender rehabilitation treatment program. LO4.2: Evaluate the effectiveness of an evidence-based domestic violence offender rehabilitation treatment program |
Response has fewer than two logical conclusions of why the evidence-based domestic violence offender rehabilitation treatment program is or is not effective. Response does not utilize statistical data to support your argument of whether the evidence-based domestic violence offender rehabilitation treatment program is effective. Response does not make a recommendation and/or argument for using or not using the evidence-based domestic violence offender rehabilitation treatment program in your community. |
Response draws two logical conclusions of why the evidence-based domestic violence offender rehabilitation treatment program is or is not effective. Response includes statistical data to support your argument of whether the evidence-based domestic violence offender rehabilitation treatment program is effective. Response includes if you would recommend the evidence-based domestic violence offender rehabilitation treatment program in your community and why. |
References
Provide an APA Style citation for each resource you used to write your response to this Assessment.
Mastery Rubric
In order to achieve mastery of this Competency, you must achieve a “2” on every rubric row in addition to meeting the additional expectation indicated in the Mastery Rubric.
|
Mastery Rubric |
No |
Yes |
|
Exceeds Expectations: Analyzes Statistical Data to Make Informed Conclusions |
||
|
LO1: Analyze multiple and relevant data sources to explain the effectiveness of rehabilitation and treatment programs in the criminal justice field. |
Responses to the items do not use statistical data from multiple and relevant sources to demonstrate a thorough understanding of the effectiveness of rehabilitation and treatment programs in the criminal justice field. |
Responses to the items use statistical data from multiple and relevant sources to demonstrate a thorough understanding of the effectiveness of rehabilitation and treatment programs in the criminal justice field. |
Professional Skills Rubric
The faculty Assessor will provide feedback based on the following Professional Skills: Information Literacy and Interpreting Data and Quantitative Fluency. If you are concerned that you will not meet these expectations, reach out to your Coach, so he or she can work with you to further develop each important professional skill.
|
Information Literacy: Apply strategies to evaluate information in order to effectively analyze issues and make decisions. |
|||
|
LO1: Identify and locate credible sources. |
No sources or non-credible sources are present. |
Sources are inconsistently credible, appropriate, and relevant to the topic and/or assessment. |
Sources are mostly credible, appropriate, and relevant to the topic and/or assessment. |
|
LO2: Analyze information sources. |
Analysis is not present. |
Analysis superficially applies aspects of sources that are most relevant to the topic and/or assessment and/or analysis is unclear. |
Analysis thoroughly and clearly applies aspects of sources that are most relevant to the topic and/or assessment. |
|
LO3: Synthesize information from multiple, credible sources. |
Synthesis is not present. |
Synthesis demonstrates a vague connection between multiple sources and/or the topic. |
Synthesis demonstrates a clear and cohesive connection between multiple sources and/or ideas to support a given topic. |
|
Interpreting Data and Quantitative Fluency: Interpret quantitative data in order to analyze issues and make decisions. |
|||
|
LO1: Identify conclusions from numeric information presented in narrative and/or graphic form. |
No conclusions are made based on numeric information. |
Connections between conclusions and numeric information are vague or inaccurate. |
Conclusions identified are appropriately connected to the numeric information. |
|
LO2: Use both narrative and graphic form to explain the same data. |
Graphs and/or narrative are not present. |
Supportive connection between narrative and graph is not clearly explained. |
Narrative explanation of quantitative data explains the graph and the graph illustrates and clarifies the narrative. |
|
LO3: Use quantitative data as evidence for a decision or recommendation. |
Quantitative evidence is not used. |
Quantitative evidence does not support or is superfluous to the recommendation or decision. |
Argument for a decision or recommendation incorporates appropriate quantitative data as evidence. |
©2019 Walden University 8