Uncategorized
Music Video Analysis
Music Video Analysis
In 1,000 words, you will need to complete the following:
Watch this music video- https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rtOvBOTyX00
.
- Analyze the visual image and people in the music video.
- Describe what messages the images and people convey towards societal topics and societal groups.
- Identify whether the images are effective in getting people to think in certain ways about the topics and groups. Why or Why Not?
- Provide examples from the video to support your claims.
Be sure to include the URL to the video.
Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.
This assignment uses a scoring guide. Please review the scoring guide prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.
CHECK YOUR WORK WITH THE ATTACHED RUBRIC TO MAKE SURE YOU COMPLETED ASSIGNMENT PROPERLY!!!
Rubic_Print_Format
| Course Code | Class Code | Assignment Title | Total Points | ||||||
| COM-520 | COM-520-O500 | Music Video Analysis | 90.0 | ||||||
| Criteria | Percentage | Unsatisfactory (0.00%) | Less than Satisfactory (74.00%) | Satisfactory (79.00%) | Good (87.00%) | Excellent (100.00%) | Comments | Points Earned | |
| Content | 70.0% | ||||||||
| Analyze the visual image and people in the music video | 20.0% | Analysis of the visual images and people in the music video is incomplete or missing. | Analysis of the visual images and people in the music video is weak and missing evidence. | Analysis of the visual images and people in the music video is appropriate but somewhat unclear. | Analysis of the visual images and people in the music video is strong with sound analysis and appropriate evidence. | Analysis of the visual images and people in the music video is comprehensive and insightful with well researched evidence. | |||
| Describe what messages the images and people convey towards societal topics and societal groups | Description does not explain what messages the images and people convey towards societal topics and societal groups. | Description inadequately explains what messages the images and people convey towards societal topics and societal groups. | Description adequately explains what messages the images and people convey towards societal topics and societal groups. | Description clearly explains what messages the images and people convey towards societal topics and societal groups. | Description expertly explains what messages the images and people convey towards societal topics and societal groups. | ||||
| Identify whether the images are effective in getting people to think in certain ways about the topics and groups. Why or Why Not? | Identification of why or why not the images are effective in getting people to think in certain ways about the topics and groups is missing. | Identification of why or why not the images are effective in getting people to think in certain ways about the topics and groups is incomplete. | Identification of why or why not the images are effective in getting people to think in certain ways about the topics and groups is complete. | Identification of why or why not the images are effective in getting people to think in certain ways about the topics and groups is complete with appropriate examples. | Identification of why or why not the images are effective in getting people to think in certain ways about the topics and groups is complete with well researched examples. | ||||
| Provide examples from the video to support your claims. | 10.0% | Supporting examples from the video are incomplete or missing. | Supporting examples from the video are weak. | Supporting examples from the video are appropriate. | Supporting examples from the video are strong. | Supporting examples from the video are comprehensive and insightful. | |||
| Organization and Effectiveness | |||||||||
| Thesis Development and Purpose | 7.0% | Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim. | Thesis is insufficiently developed or vague. Purpose is not clear. | Thesis is apparent and appropriate to purpose. | Thesis is clear and forecasts the development of the paper. Thesis is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose. | Thesis is comprehensive and contains the essence of the paper. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear. | |||
| Argument Logic and Construction | 8.0% | Statement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. The conclusion does not support the claim made. Argument is incoherent and uses noncredible sources. | Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic. Some sources have questionable credibility. | Argument is orderly, but may have a few inconsistencies. The argument presents minimal justification of claims. Argument logically, but not thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sources used are credible. Introduction and conclusion bracket the thesis. | Argument shows logical progressions. Techniques of argumentation are evident. There is a smooth progression of claims from introduction to conclusion. Most sources are authoritative. | Clear and convincing argument that presents a persuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are authoritative. | |||
| Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use) | 5.0% | Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction is used. | Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register) or word choice are present. Sentence structure is correct but not varied. | Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct and varied sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are employed. | Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. The writer uses a variety of effective sentence structures and figures of speech. | Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English. | |||
| Format | |||||||||
| Paper Format (use of appropriate style for the major and assignment) | Template is not used appropriately or documentation format is rarely followed correctly. | Appropriate template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken. A lack of control with formatting is apparent. | Appropriate template is used. Formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present. | Appropriate template is fully used. There are virtually no errors in formatting style. | All format elements are correct. | ||||
| Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style) | Sources are not documented. | Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors. | Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present. | Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct. | Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error. | ||||
| Total Weightage | 100% |