Literature Evaluation Table

In nursing practice, accurate identification and application of research is essential to achieving successful outcomes. The ability to articulate research data and summarize relevant content supports the student’s ability to further develop and synthesize the assignments that constitute the components of the capstone project.

The assignment will be used to develop a written implementation plan.

For this assignment, provide a synopsis of the review of the research literature. Using the “Literature Evaluation Table,” determine the level and strength of the evidence for each of the eight research articles you have selected. The articles should be current (within the last 5 years) and closely relate to the PICOT question developed earlier in this course. The articles may include quantitative research, descriptive analyses, longitudinal studies, or meta-analysis articles. A systematic review may be used to provide background information for the purpose or problem identified in the proposed capstone project.

While APA style is not required for the body of this assignment, solid academic writing is expected, and in-text citations and references should be presented using APA documentation guidelines, which can be found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.

This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

You are not required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite.

nursingon time

LiteratureEvaluation Table

Student Name:

Change Topic (2-3 sentences):

	Criteria	Article 1	Article 2	Article 3	Article 4
	Author, Journal (Peer-Reviewed), and Permalink or Working Link to Access Article
	Article Title and Year Published
Research Questions (Qualitative)/Hypothesis (Quantitative)
Purposes/Aim of Study
	Design (Type of Quantitative, or Type of Qualitative)
	Setting/Sample
	Methods: Intervention/Instruments
	Analysis
	Key Findings
	Recommendations
Explanation of How the Article Supports EBP/Capstone Project

Criteria

Author, Journal (Peer-Reviewed), and

Permalink or Working Link to Access Article

Article Title and Year Published

Design (Type of Quantitative, or Type of Qualitative)

Setting/Sample

Methods: Intervention/Instruments

Analysis

Key Findings

Recommendations

Article 5	Article 6	Article 7	Article 8
Research Questions (Qualitative)/Hypothesis (Quantitative)
Purposes/Aim of Study
Explanation of How the Article Supports EBP/Capstone

© 2015. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.

© 2017. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.

LiteratureEvaluation Table

Student Name:

Change Topic (2-3 sentences):

	Criteria	Article 1	Article 2	Article 3	Article 4
	Author, Journal (Peer-Reviewed), and Permalink or Working Link to Access Article
	Article Title and Year Published
Research Questions (Qualitative)/Hypothesis (Quantitative)
	Purposes/Aim of Study
	Design (Type of Quantitative, or Type of Qualitative)
	Setting/Sample
	Methods: Intervention/Instruments
	Analysis
	Key Findings
	Recommendations
Explanation of How the Article Supports EBP/Capstone Project

Criteria

Author, Journal (Peer-Reviewed), and

Permalink or Working Link to Access Article

Article Title and Year Published

Purposes/Aim of Study

Design (Type of Quantitative, or Type of Qualitative)

Setting/Sample

Methods: Intervention/Instruments

Analysis

Key Findings

Recommendations

Article 5	Article 6	Article 7	Article 8
Research Questions (Qualitative)/Hypothesis (Quantitative)
Explanation of How the Article Supports EBP/Capstone

References

Cross, S., Kaufman, B., Taylor, D., Kamal, A., & Warraich, H. (2020). Trends and Factors Associated with Place of Death for Individuals with Dementia in the United States from 2003 to 2017 (S702). Journal of Pain and Symptom Management, 59(2), 529.

DiZazzo-Miller, R., Pociask, F., & Adamo, D. (2020). Physical Markers of Functional Fitness in Persons with Dementia and Their Family Caregivers. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 74(4_Supplement_1), 7411505119p1-7411505119p1.

Lau, W. L., Fisher, M., Greenia, D., Floriolli, D., Fletcher, E., Singh, B., … & Paganini-Hill, A. (2020). Cystatin C, Cognition and Brain MRI Findings in 90+ Year-olds. Neurobiology of Aging.

Lee, Y., Cho, Y., & Oh, H. (2020). Multiple chronic conditions and risk of cognitive impairment and dementia among older Americans: findings from the Aging, Demographics, and Memory Study (ADAMS). Aging, Neuropsychology, and Cognition, 1-15.

Simpkins, A. N. (2020). Impact of Race-Ethnic and Economic Disparities on Rates of Vascular Dementia in the National Inpatient Sample Database from 2006-2014. Journal of Stroke and Cerebrovascular Diseases, 29(5), 104731

Vollmer Dahlke, D., & Ory, M. G. (2020). Emerging Issues of Intelligent Assistive Technology Use Among People with Dementia and Their Caregivers: A US Perspective. Frontiers in Public Health, 8, 191..

White, L., Fishman, P., Basu, A., Crane, P. K., Larson, E. B., & Coe, N. B. (2020). Dementia Is Associated with Earlier Mortality for Men and Women in the United States. Gerontology and Geriatric Medicine, 6, 2333721420945922.

Xu, W., Wu, C., & Fletcher, J. (2020). Assessment of changes in place of death of older adults who died from dementia in the United States, 2000–2014: a time-series cross-sectional analysis. BMC public health, 20(1), 1-13.

© 2015. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.

© 2017. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.