HRM 4570 ILR Homework 2

HRM4570 ILR Homework 2 (Ch7, 8, 9,

Save Time On Research and Writing
Hire a Pro to Write You a 100% Plagiarism-Free Paper.
Get My Paper

1

1)

Name:______________________________

Student Number: ____________________

Save Time On Research and Writing
Hire a Pro to Write You a 100% Plagiarism-Free Paper.
Get My Paper

HOMEWORK 2 (3%)

1.

Please download Homework 2 (3%) from Blackboard.

2.

Rename Homework 2 as “HRM 4570 ILR Homework 2 First Name Last Name” Please type your name.

3.

Complete Homework 2 while studying the online lectures. Fill in the blanks / type the correct answers. You should be able to find all answers from the lecture slides.

4.

Upload / attach your completed Homework 2 on Blackboard Homework 2.

5. Late submission of homework (by email) will result in a penalty of 1% (out of 3%) per day. Late work submitted more than three days after the due date will not be accepted and will receive a grade of zero.

6. Submit your paper on BlackBoard “Homework 2”. Homework 2 is due on Nov 23 by 11:59pm.

HRM 4570 ILR Lecture Notes

Chapter 7.1 Bargaining

Preparing to Bargain

1. Assembling a team

2. Collecting information: The information from employer and union form the basis to determine five essential things

1 _____________

2 _____________ for achieving interests

3 External _______________ of fairness

4 The other side’s _____________

5 Best ________________ to a negotiated agreement

3. From these, both bargaining teams develop targets, priorities, and strategies.

4. Creating a strike contingency plan is another important aspect of bargaining preparations.

5. Sixty days before the existing contract expires, or 90 days in the health care industry, the parties provide official notification to each other and to the Federal Mediation and Conciliation Service that they intend to negotiate a new contract. The bargaining teams then Establish a schedule of bargaining sessions and set ground rules.

Quiz

Examples of bargaining items

Mandatory, Permissive or Illegal?

1. Health insurance for retired employees 

2. Change in retirement plan contributions 

3. Seniority provisions 

4. Contract ratification procedures 

5. Health insurance premiums 

6. Wages below minimum wage 

7. Straight time pay for overtime hours 

8.

Employee drug testing 

9. Subcontracting work 

10. Plant closings 

11. Union representation on the board of directors 

12. Pension/retirement contributions 

Bargaining items are classified into three categories:

1. ____

_____________ bargaining

items: Includes wages, hours, and terms and conditions of employment

2. _________________ bargaining items: Those that would violate the law, such as payment of wages below the legal minimum

3. _________________ bargaining items: Includes everything excluding mandatory and illegal

Permissive bargaining items: Includes everything excluding mandatory and illegal

a) Employer and union can bargain over permissive items if they choose

b) BUT because they are ________________ the boundaries of the ______________, the NLRB cannot order bargaining on these issues.

c) And employees are ________ protected if they go on strike over these issues.

Table 7.3 – Examples of Mandatory and Permissive Bargaining Items

Mandatory bargaining items

Permissive bargaining items

1. _______ reduction / increases

1. _________ representation on board of directors

2. _______ plans

2.

3. __________ insurance payments

4. __________ contributions

3. Drug and alcohol screening for ___________

5. Work schedule and __________

4.

Benefits

for __________

6. ____________ provisions

7. ____________ discipline provisions

8. Grievance arbitration

5. Interest arbitration

9. Food prices in the company cafeteria

6. Bargaining _______ expansion

10. Lie detector and________ tests

7. Contract ___________ procedures

11. ________________

8.

12. ___________of plan closing

9. Plant ____________

HRM 4570 ILR Lecture Notes

Chapter 7.2 Bargaining

The Four Subprocesses of Labor Negotiations

2.

Bargaining Subprocess

Brief explanation

Focus

1.

· Negotiation used to resolve ___________ of interests.

· ____________ bargaining

Resolving conflicts of interests, often adversely

· Seeks to unify the ________ interests of the parties to a negotiation

· _____________ bargaining

Solving joint problems (that do not involve conflicts of interests) by creating solutions for mutual gains; often collaborative.

3.

· Building ________ and respect.

· Establishes the broad quality of the relationship between labor and management.

Changing attitudes and overall labor-management relationships, Often trust-building

4.

· The bargaining process that takes place ____________ an organization

Achieving consensus within each group; often complex

Table 7.5 – Distributive and Integrative Bargaining

Distributive Bargaining

Integrative Bargaining

Conflict

Imagery

Distributing a _______ pie

Integrating interests to _______ _____________ of the pie

Focus

Trust

Of minor importance, hindered

Critical, facilitate

Information

Participation

Chief spokesperson/ lead negotiator only

All members of negotiating teams

Tactics

Manipulating perceptions of positions, increasing costs of delay

Braining storming, using objective criteria

Benefits

Wining gains for your side through bargaining power

Creating joint gain and stronger relationship

Risks

Too aggressive? Harmful to the relationship? How to innovate?

Selling out? Giving up too much?

Difficulties for negotiators

Stress

Giving up control, selling results to constituents, time-consuming

Question marks

How to prevent adversarial tactics from damaging the relationship?

How to distribute the increases gains?

Other labels/ Also known as ….

_____________bargaining

hard bargaining

traditional bargaining

_____________bargaining

mutual gain bargaining

_____________ bargaining

In sum

Examples of Distributive, Integrative, and Hybrid Issues*

Distributive

Integrative

Hybrid

HRM 4570 ILR Lecture Notes

Chapter 8.1 Impasse, Strikes

__________ disputes: Pertain to ______________ of interest

· Higher wages versus _________________

· ____________-based layoffs versus _________-based layoffs

· Broad union input into managerial issues versus strict management ___________ to conduct business without interference

________disputes: Disagreements over whether someone’s rights have been violated

· Specified in the union contract

· These rights are ________________

· Conflicts over the application and _____________of a contract

A ___________ occurs when employees refuse to work until an employer changes position on one or more issues

· An expression of protest and dissatisfaction

· Frequently intended to pressurize an employer

· By __________________ their labor:

· Strikers seek to _____________ the employer’s cost of disagreement by depriving the employer of profits

· The ability to satisfy the demands of taxpayers and voters

Types of strikes

_____________strike: Employees might strike to win better wages, benefits, and work rules

____________: An ___________-initiated rather than worker-initiated work stoppage during a bargaining impasse

___________________strike: A strike to protest an employer’s unfair labor practice.

_____________ strike: Striking to support _________ workers who are on strike

_____________ strike: Most union contracts contain a no-strike clause prohibiting work stoppages over grievances during the life of the contract

_____________ strike: When a union strikes to force an employer to assign certain work to its members

Work stoppages have negative effects:

1. _________ in productivity

2. _________ of profits

3. _________in stock prices

4. _________of income for workers and stress

Other Pressure Tactics

1. _____________: Campaign to encourage a company’s customers to stop doing business with it

2. ___________________:

· Slowdowns try to pressure employers by imposing costs through lowered productivity, but without employees leaving their jobs and going on strike/

· Another method for engaging in work slowdowns is the use of partial, quickie, or intermittent strikes

3. ___________________: Seek to bolster inside tactics with external pressure, directed at corporate headquarters by outsiders

HRM 4570 ILR Lecture Notes

Chapter 8.2 Dispute Resolution

The four options for third Party Dispute Resolution

Degree of Third-Party Control

Low

High

Degree of Third-Party Control over the outcome

Low

High

Process of mediation

1. ______________________ in which the mediator collects information and establishes ground rules

2. _______________________ wherein the mediator works on clarifying the disputed issues and on developing alternative solutions

3. The focus of the mediator is ______________________________

Interest Arbitration

The two primary forms of interest arbitration are:

1. _______________

arbitration

· The arbitrator is _____ constrained in deciding the settlement terms

___________ effect of arbitration: The ____________of the arbitrator’s choice and the loss of control by the negotiators over the settlement terms ___________ negotiators to reach their own negotiated agreement ____________ resorting to arbitration

2. Final offer arbitration

· Created such that the arbitrator _________________ between the union’s final offer and the employer’s final offer

· Final offer arbitration has two variations

1. _______________final offer arbitration, in which the arbitrator must select one party’s final offer on all the disputed contract terms; and

2. _______________

final offer arbitration, in which the arbitrator can choose either party’s final offer on an issue-by-issue basis.

___________ effect of arbitration: Negotiators might become addicted to or over _________on arbitration

Fact-Finding

Third-party dispute resolution method

· A neutral third party called the fact finder investigates a bargaining impasse and issues a ___________ recommendations for settlement

· It does ______ guarantee a resolution

· It does ______ assist the negotiators

Chapter 8 Impasse, Strikes, and Dispute Resolution

Dispute Resolution Quiz

1. Third-party dispute resolution mechanisms use ____________________ to settle bargaining impasses with the goal of avoiding costly strikes. 
A. a neutral third-party
B. decertification elections
C. boycotts
D. a local county judge

2. Which of the following is not a typical stage of mediation? 
A. Setting ground rules and building trust between parties
B. Clarifying disputed issues and developing some alternative solutions
C. Determining whether any unfair labor practices were committed during negotiations
D. Working with negotiators to identify a mutually acceptable agreement

3. A dispute resolution process in which a neutral third party examines the final offers of each party and then chooses the one that seems, overall, to be the most reasonable and responsible settlement.

A. Conventional arbitration 

B. Whole package arbitration 

C. Mediation 

D. Fact-finding 

E. Issue-by-issue final offer arbitration

4. In _______________________ arbitration, the arbitrator is not constrained to choose either the management or union’s offer(s); rather she can make up whatever final contract terms she deems appropriate and fair.

A. Conventional

B. Issue-by-issue final offer

C. Whole package final offer

D. Mediation

5. The tendency for management and labor to rely on an arbitrator to make decisions for them, rather than come to an agreement themselves, is known as:

A. The chilling effect.

B. The narcotic effect.

C. The dependency effect.

D. The arbitrator authority effect.

6. dispute resolution process in which a neutral third party assists the parties in reaching a mutually-acceptable resolution.

A. Conventional arbitration 
B. Whole package arbitration 
C. Mediation 
D. Fact-finding 

E. Issue-by-issue, final offer arbitration 

7. A dispute resolution process in which a neutral third party examines the final offers of each party and then designs a contract by choosing either the union or management’s offer on each issue.

A. Conventional arbitration 
B. Whole package arbitration 
C. Mediation 
D. Fact-finding 
E. Issue-by-issue final offer arbitration

8. A dispute resolution process in which a neutral third party examines the final offers of each party and then creates a new contract which may or may not reflect the parties’ positions on each issue.

A. Conventional arbitration 
B. Whole package arbitration 
C. Mediation 
D. Fact-finding 
E. Issue-by-issue final offer arbitration

9. A dispute resolution process in which a neutral third party investigates the claims and positions of each party and provides a public assessment of the situation.

A. Conventional arbitration 
B. Whole package arbitration 
C. Mediation 
D. Fact-finding 
E. Issue-by-issue final offer arbitration

10. The tendency of labor and management to take extreme positions in their final offers in the hopes that an arbitrator will “split the difference” between offers is known as the:

A. The chilling effect.
B. The narcotic effect.
C. The dependency effect.
D. The arbitrator authority effect.

HRM 4570 ILR Lecture Notes

Chapter 9 Contract Clauses and Their Administration

The Major Components of Traditional U.S. Union Contract

__________________________________: Interpreting, applying, and resolving conflicts regarding collective bargaining agreements

Employee Rights

1. _________________ discipline and discharge

Employee Rights

2. __________________rights in layoffs, promotions, etc.

Employee rights

3. __________________ (pay, benefits, etc.)

Employee rights

4. Fair hearing through the________________ procedures

Job Rights

1. Job holders _______________ to a certain wage rate

Job Rights

2. Specific tasks must be done within the bargaining unit and by certain jobs.

Union Rights

1. ___________bargaining agent

Union Rights

2. Union leader ________ to the workplace

Union Rights

3. Union ____________________ in the workplace

Union Rights

4. Shop stewards.

Union Rights

5. Union ____________ and dues checkoff clauses

Management Rights

1. _________ and fire (with just cause)

Management Rights

2.Determine job___________ and workforce size

Management Rights

3. Establish production standards and ________ of conduct

Management Rights

4. Decide what to ___________ and how and where to where to make it.

Grievance Procedure

1. Employees, the union, and management meet to _____________disputes over the ______________and _____________ of the contract.

2. Typically a ______________ procedure in which unresolved grievances are _____________to higher levels in the organization.

3. The final step is frequently _______________________________.

Just cause discipline or discharge

There must be _______________________ reasons for being disciplined or fired

HRM 4570 ILR Lecture Notes

Chapter 11 Globalization

Table 11.2 – Globalization: The Good, the Bad, and the Unequal

________ trade: Removal of all trade barriers

________ trade: Incorporation of labor, environmental, public health, and other standards into trade agreements

________________________________________(ILO): A specialized agency of the United Nations focused on promoting social justice and internationally recognized human and labor rights

The ILO’s unique _________ structure consists of each country sending representatives of

1. _______________
2. _______________

3. _______________

ILO Fundamental Conventions

1. freedom of _______________ and the effective recognition of the right to _____________________;

2. the elimination of all forms of forced or compulsory labor;

3. the effective abolition of child labor;

4. and the elimination of discrimination in respect of employment and occupation. 

____________________________________ are legal instruments drawn up by the ILO’s constituents (governments, employers and workers) and setting out basic principles and rights at work.

They are either _____________, which are legally binding international treaties that may be ratified by member states, or ________________, which serve as non-binding guidelines.

Conventions and Protocols ____________________by United States

· C087 – Freedom of Association and Protection of the Right to Organise Convention, 1948 (No. 87) – not ratified

· C098 – Right to Organize and Collective Bargaining Convention, 1949 (No. 98) – not ratified

Corporate Codes of _______________: Written statements of standards that a company pledges to follow in its business activities

Do Corporate Codes of Conduct Work?

· Can be effective in some sectors

· International ________ production chains

· ______________ industries

· Adequate community-level capacity –non-governmental organizations

· _____________ presence

· Less effective where,

· No __________

pressure, no government pressure

· No __________

· No __________ pressure

North American _______________ Agreement (NAFTA) – Free trade agreement among the United States, _______________ and _______________.

North American Agreement on _____________Cooperation (NAALC)

· Freedom of _____________ and the right to ____________

· The right to bargain _____________.

· The right to ____________ standards for wages and _______ working conditions

1

Chapter 7
Part 1

Bargaining

Copyright © 2013 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
McGraw-Hill/Irwin

Hi Class, Welcome to Industrial and Labor Relations. Today we are going to discuss Chapter 7 Part 1 Bargaining
Bargaining between unions and employers is one of the three very important processes of U.S. labor relations. The goal of this chapter is for students to understand the behavioral, strategic, and legal aspects of collectively bargaining contracts in U.S. labor relations. The chapter also includes discussions of the important practical elements of bargaining, including preparation, costing, and the timeline of the negotiation process.

1

7-2
Sketch the steps of the bargaining time line
Define the different types of bargaining structures
Discuss the determinants and importance of bargaining power
Explain the legal parameters of the U.S. bargaining process
Learning Objectives

The learning objectives of Chapter 7 Bargaining are as follows
Sketch the steps of the bargaining time line
Define the different types of bargaining structures
Discuss the determinants and importance of bargaining power
Explain the legal parameters of the U.S. bargaining process
2

7-3
Outline the four sub processes of bargaining, their purposes, and their tactics
Understand the pressures for changing from traditional to integrative bargaining, and why this is difficult
Learning Objectives

Outline the four sub processes of bargaining, their purposes, and their tactics
Understand the pressures for changing from traditional to integrative bargaining, and why this is difficult
3

Collective Bargaining

Please click on the video and watch what is collective bargaining.
4

7-5
U.S. union contracts usually include the following subjects:
Compensation
Personnel policies and procedures
Employee rights and responsibilities
Employer rights and responsibilities
Union rights and responsibilities
Dispute resolution and ongoing decision making
Introduction

Through the process of collective bargaining, employers and unions negotiate terms and conditions of employment, and put these terms into written contracts, also called collective bargaining agreements. In the United States these contracts are legally binding and typically last one to five years, with a three-year duration being the most common.
U.S. union contracts usually include the following subjects:
Compensation: wages, benefits, vacations and holidays, shift premiums, profit sharing. Compensation items might also be referred to as economic issues, and the other areas are called administrative or language issues.
Personnel policies and procedures: layoff, promotion, and transfer policies, overtime and vacation rules
Employee rights and responsibilities: seniority rights, job standards, workplace rules
Employer rights and responsibilities: management rights, just cause discipline and discharge, subcontracting, safety standards
Union rights and responsibilities: recognition as bargaining agent, bulletin board, union security, dues checkoff, shop stewards, no strike clauses
Dispute resolution and ongoing decision making: grievance procedures, committees, consultation, renegotiation procedures
5

7-6
The preparation stage usually begins at least several months before bargaining begins, or even 18 months before the start of a particularly large, complex, or pattern-setting negotiation; it usually involves the following stages:
1. Assembling a team
2. Collecting information
Preparing to Bargain

The longest portion of the time line of a negotiation process is the preparation stage.
The preparation stage usually begins at least several months before bargaining begins, or even 18 months before the start of a particularly large, complex, or pattern-setting negotiation; it usually involves the following stages:
In Stage 1, Assembling a team—for the employer team, managerial roles typically determine bargaining team responsibilities, whereas union bargaining committees are usually elected by the rank and file.
In Stage 2, Collecting information
6

7-7
Collecting information
The information from employer and union form the basis to determine five essential things
Interests
Options for achieving interests
External benchmarks of fairness
The other side’s interests
Best alternative to a negotiated agreement
2. Collecting information

When Collecting information— Managers might collect external benchmarking data on labor costs and other items, and should also review the organization’s financial performance and strategic plans. The union negotiating committee will likely survey the rank and file to identify common concerns and goals, and also consult with its national union. Both sides should also conduct thorough reviews of how the expiring collective bargaining agreement has performed. Areas of the contract that have created problems, such as high levels of grievances, should be noted. These pieces of information form the basis for each side to determine the following five essential things, from which, both bargaining teams develop targets, priorities, and strategies:
Their interests (what they are really concerned about)
Options for achieving their interests
External benchmarks of fairness
The other side’s interests
Their best alternative to a negotiated agreement (BATNA)
7

BATNA
Best alternative to a negotiated agreement

Please click on the video and watch What is BATNA or Best alternative to a negotiated agreement ?
8

7-9
3. From these, both bargaining teams develop targets, priorities, and strategies.
4. Creating a strike contingency plan is another important aspect of bargaining preparations.
5. Sixty days before the existing contract expires, or 90 days in the health care industry, the parties provide official notification to each other and to the Federal Mediation and Conciliation Service that they intend to negotiate a new contract. The bargaining teams then Establish a schedule of bargaining sessions and set ground rules.
 
Preparing to Bargain

In stage 3, From these, both bargaining teams develop targets, priorities, and strategies. Extensive checklists for both employer and union negotiators are available to help guide preparation activities.
In stage 4, Creating a strike contingency plan is another important aspect of bargaining preparations.
In stage 5, Sixty days before the existing contract expires, or 90 days in the health care industry, the parties provide official notification to each other and to the Federal Mediation and Conciliation Service that they intend to negotiate a new contract. The bargaining teams then Establish a schedule of bargaining sessions and set ground rules.
 
9

7-10
Figure 7.1 – The Bargaining Time Line

Figure 7.1 shows The Bargaining Time Line
10

7-11
An appropriate bargaining unit is defined during the representation process. This unit is the minimal unit for collective bargaining.
Once certified, multiple units can be combined into a single larger bargaining unit for the purposes of negotiating a contract if the parties agree. The resulting organizational structure for the collective bargaining process is called the bargaining structure.
If the parties agree, the multiple units combines into single larger bargaining unit for negotiating a contract
Bargaining Structure

An appropriate bargaining unit is defined during the representation process. This unit is the minimal unit for collective bargaining.
Once certified, multiple units can be combined into a single larger bargaining unit for the purposes of negotiating a contract if the parties agree. The resulting organizational structure for the collective bargaining process is called the bargaining structure.
If the parties agree, the multiple units combines into single larger bargaining unit for negotiating a contract
11

7-12
Figure 7.2 – Bargaining Structures

Figure 7.2 shows four types of bargaining structures.
12

7-13
Employers prefer decentralized bargaining structures to have local unions compete against one another for jobs (this is called “whipsawing”) and to tailor contracts to local situations.
Unions are generally believed to prefer more centralized structures because they can consolidate their power and prevent whipsawing by negotiating uniform contracts (this is called “taking wages out of competition”).
Bargaining Structure

The conventional wisdom is that in many situations, employers prefer decentralized bargaining structures to have local unions compete against one another for jobs (this is called “whipsawing”) and to tailor contracts to local situations.
Unions are generally believed to prefer more centralized structures because they can consolidate their power and prevent whipsawing by negotiating uniform contracts (this is called “taking wages out of competition”).
13

7-14
The bargaining structure in the United States is typically decentralized;
the leading explanations for this appears to be that employers have been able to use their greater bargaining leverage to force more decentralization
both firms and workers like the flexibility and opportunities for employee involvement in decision making allowed by decentralized bargaining structures.
Bargaining Structure

The bargaining structure in the United States is typically decentralized; the leading explanations for this appears to be that employers have been able to use their greater bargaining leverage to force more decentralization and also that both firms and workers like the flexibility and opportunities for employee involvement in decision making allowed by decentralized bargaining structures.
14

7-15
Pattern bargaining: The union bargains exclusively with the target company until an agreement is reached
Sequential bargaining process is an informal way of achieving more centralized bargaining structure
Pattern bargaining can help unions take wages out of competition, but there are also intraorganizational bargaining reasons.
Before the 1980s pattern bargaining was a prominent feature of collective bargaining in many industries
Bargaining Structure

Another type of bargaining structure is pattern bargaining in which the union bargains exclusively with a target company until an agreement is reached. The target settlement is then used by the union as a pattern for subsequent negotiations in the industry;
this sequential bargaining process is an informal way of achieving a more centralized bargaining structure.
Pattern bargaining can help unions take wages out of competition, but there are also intraorganizational bargaining reasons.
Before the 1980s pattern bargaining was a prominent feature of collective bargaining in many industries

15

Pattern Bargaining

Please click on the video and watch an example of pattern bargaining.
16

7-17
When determining the desired bargaining structure, labor and management negotiators face a trade-off between power and responsiveness
Decentralized bargaining can be more responsive to local needs
Issues are more homogeneous and the negotiators are close to their constituents
As negotiations become more centralized, the number of issues increase
Bargaining Structure

When determining the desired bargaining structure, labor and management negotiators face a trade-off between power and responsiveness.
Compared to a centralized bargaining structure, decentralized bargaining can be more responsive to local needs because the issues are often more homogeneous and the negotiators are close to their constituents; however, decentralized bargaining can also reduce labor’s bargaining power.
As negotiations become more centralized, the number of issues increases, labor and management negotiators become further removed from their constituents, and it is more difficult to tailor local solutions for specific problems.

17

7-18
Negotiators are situated in a complex environment that provides opportunities and constraints
What happens at the bargaining table reflects differences in relative bargaining power between labor and management.
Bargaining power is “the ability to secure another’s agreement on one’s own terms.”
This ability depends on the relative costs of agreeing and disagreeing
Bargaining Power and the Bargaining Environment

Negotiators are situated in a complex environment that provides opportunities and constraints
What happens at the bargaining table reflects differences in relative bargaining power between labor and management. Bargaining power is “the ability to secure another’s agreement on one’s own terms.” This ability depends on the relative costs of agreeing and disagreeing; the side that can impose greater disagreement costs on the other will be in a more powerful position.
18

7-19
A critical reason that U.S. labor law protects workers’ efforts at forming unions and engaging in collective bargaining is to balance bargaining power between a company and a group of employees.
Strikes are the most important way for unions to impose disagreement costs on employers
A union with strong strike leverage can impose significant costs on management through a strike
Bargaining Power and the Bargaining Environment

A critical reason that U.S. labor law protects workers’ efforts at forming unions and engaging in collective bargaining is to balance bargaining power between a company and a group of employees.
Strikes are the most important way for unions to impose disagreement costs on employers,
so relative bargaining power is closely related to a union’s strike leverage; a union with strong strike leverage can impose significant costs on management through a strike, and labor in this situation has strong bargaining power relative to the employer, resulting in contract terms favoring the employees; the reverse is true if a union has weak strike leverage.
19

7-20
Analyzing relative bargaining power includes identifying the important elements of the bargaining environment
Diverse set of external influences on labor and management as a contract is negotiated
The dimensions of the bargaining environment apply equally to the private and public sectors
Overpaid workers can be replaced by others willing to work for less
Bargaining Power and the Bargaining Environment

Analyzing relative bargaining power—or strike leverage—consists of identifying the important elements of the bargaining environment. The bargaining environment is the diverse set of external influences on labor and management as they sit at a bargaining table negotiating a contract.
Diverse set of external influences on labor and management as a contract is negotiated
The dimensions of the bargaining environment apply equally to the private and public sectors
Overpaid workers can be replaced by others willing to work for less

20

7-21
There are at least two key differences between the public and private sectors:
1. Although some services can be privatized or outsourced, essential services must still be provided. Public sector management does not have the option of moving to a different location in search of lower labor costs.
2. Public services are not bought and sold in economic markets; instead the levels of services are ultimately determined by voters, taxpayers, and elected officials in the political arena.
Bargaining Environment:
private and public sectors.

The dimensions of the bargaining environment apply equally well to the private and public sectors.
There are at least two key differences between the public and private sectors:
1. Although some services can be privatized or outsourced, essential services must still be provided. Public sector management does not have the option of moving to a different location in search of lower labor costs. This places an important constraint on the business strategies available to public sector managers.
2. Public services are not bought and sold in economic markets; instead the levels of services are ultimately determined by voters, taxpayers, and elected officials in the political arena. This heightens the importance of the sociopolitical dimension of the bargaining environment.
These differences lead some to argue that public sector collective bargaining should be prohibited because public sector unions are too powerful. The evidence, however, does not support the contention that public sector unions have unlimited bargaining power.

21

7-22
These differences lead some to argue that public sector collective bargaining should be prohibited because public sector unions are too powerful.
The evidence, however, does not support the contention that public sector unions have unlimited bargaining power.
Bargaining Environment:
private and public sectors.

These differences lead some to argue that public sector collective bargaining should be prohibited because public sector unions are too powerful.
The evidence, however, does not support the contention that public sector unions have unlimited bargaining power.

22

7-23
Negotiators need to use their communication, relationship-building, and problem-solving skills to reach an agreement that both sides find acceptable.
Most labor negotiations involve the renegotiation of an expiring contract, and this contract anchors the negotiations.

At the Bargaining Table

Once at the bargaining table, negotiators need to use their communication, relationship-building, and problem-solving skills to reach an agreement that both sides find acceptable.
Most labor negotiations involve the renegotiation of an expiring contract, and this contract anchors the negotiations. For starters, the side that wants to change the contract traditionally makes the opening proposals that mark the beginning of bargaining. From there, proposals are considered and counterproposals are made until an agreement is reached.
23

7-24
Labor negotiations as theater
The dramatic structure of labor negotiations makes negotiations more complex than they appear
Experienced lead negotiators often meet with each other in private with no other bargaining team members present, to explore wide-ranging options
This dramatic structure applies equally well to the grievance procedure
At the Bargaining Table

Labor Negotiations as Theater
The dramatic structure of labor negotiations closely parallels a theatrical play. The negotiators are actors and have roles, especially the lead negotiators with the leading parts. The audience for the actors’ performances is other negotiators and the negotiators’ constituents (upper management for management negotiators, union members for the union negotiators).
The audience has certain expectations of how the performance should proceed—that is, the constituents demand that their interests be strongly represented.
The lead negotiators need to put on a show. Table pounding and other aggressive tactics demonstrate the strength of the negotiators not to each other but to their constituents.
This theater takes place on the front stage of negotiations (the bargaining table) for the other members of the bargaining committee to see
There is also a backstage: experienced lead negotiators often meet with each other in private with no other bargaining team members present. In these meetings the negotiators can step out of their public roles, share information, and explore wide-ranging options.
In contrast with the conflictual bargaining of the front stage, backstage interactions can have a problem-solving flavor.
The dramatic structure of labor negotiations makes negotiations more complex than they appear because of the following reasons:
Negotiators have to decipher whether the other negotiators are putting on a show or trying to communicate a legitimate point.
Novice labor relations practitioners need to make sure they do not get swept up in the performance or get emotionally involved.
Participants need to know their roles, understand the nature of the entire performance, and wait for their opportunities out of the spotlight backstage.
This dramatic structure applies equally well to the grievance procedure. Novices should be prepared for public performances during meetings and hearings to resolve grievances, and should not take the process personally.
24

7-25
Negotiating tools
Contract costing: Used to evaluate proposals by estimating their monetary costs
Requires making projections of complex issues
Bargaining book – Each side uses three-ring binders to create a complete record of the negotiation and the minutes of each bargaining session
At the Bargaining Table

Negotiating Tools
Contract costing is one of the essential negotiating tools that participants use to evaluate proposals by estimating their monetary costs; a lump-sum bonus is perhaps the easiest proposal to cost—simply multiply the amount of the bonus by the number of employees who will receive it.
Most proposals are more complex, and their costs might depend on employee seniority, future staffing levels, and other complicating factors; contract costing therefore often requires making projections of complex issues and negotiators might disagree over these projections.
A bargaining book is another common tool for negotiators; each side uses three-ring binders to create a complete record of the negotiation, including their agenda, proposals, supporting documents, proposals and materials received from the other side, and the minutes of each bargaining session.
It can also be useful for the bargaining book to include a summary sheet that shows the status of each section (pending, agreed, or withdrawn) at the end of each bargaining session; negotiators might also receive assistance from neutral mediators.
25

7-26
Bargaining in good faith
NLRA requires negotiators to bargain “in good faith”
Good faith bargaining requires that the parties must make “a serious attempt to resolve differences and reach a common ground.”
Examples of bad faith bargaining:
1. Unilateral change: Occurs when an employer changes wages, benefits or other terms of employment without first bargaining with the union
At the Bargaining Table

The National Labor Relations Act (NLRA) requires negotiators to bargain “in good faith” [Section 8(d)]. Good faith bargaining requires that the parties must make “a serious attempt to resolve differences and reach a common ground.”
The dividing line between good faith and illegal bad faith bargaining, however, is not always clear.
Following are some of the illegal bad faith bargaining:
Unilateral change—occurs when an employer changes wages, benefits, or other terms and conditions of employment without first bargaining with the union; this includes both during contract negotiations and when a contract is in force; an employer can make unilateral changes in mandatory bargaining items only after it has fulfilled its bargaining obligation by bargaining to an impasse.
26

7-27
2. Direct dealing: Occurs when an employer illegally tries to circumvent and undermine a union by directly interacting with the employees with respect to bargaining issues
Refusing to provide information in certain situations
Such as upon request, from the union, which is necessary for representing the workers effectively
3. Surface bargaining: Occurs when an employer or a union goes through the motions of bargaining but does not sincerely try to reach an agreement
A company can use its bargaining power to achieve a favorable settlement (hard bargaining) but not to undermine the sincere pursuit of an agreement (surface bargaining).
At the Bargaining Table

Direct dealing—occurs when an employer illegally tries to circumvent and undermine a union by interacting directly with the employees with respect to bargaining issues.
Refusing to provide information in certain situations—upon request, an employer has an obligation to provide information to the union that is necessary for representing the workers effectively.
Surface bargaining—occurs when an employer or a union goes through the motions of bargaining but does not sincerely try to reach an agreement; it is a multifaceted concept, and in each case the NLRB looks at the specific facts and the totality of conduct, including delaying tactics, unreasonable bargaining demands, failure to designate an agent with sufficient bargaining authority, withdrawal of already agreed-upon provisions, making “take it or leave it” offers, refusing to make counterproposals, and arbitrary scheduling of meetings.
A company can use its bargaining power to achieve a favorable settlement (hard bargaining) but not to undermine the sincere pursuit of an agreement (surface bargaining).
27

7-28
NLRA requires good faith bargaining over “wages, hours, and other terms and conditions of employment” [Section 8(d)].
At the Bargaining Table

Labor law also affects what is discussed at the bargaining table; specifically, the NLRA requires good faith bargaining over “wages, hours, and other terms and conditions of employment” [Section 8(d)].

28

7-29
Bargaining items are classified into three categories:
Mandatory bargaining items: Includes wages, hours, and terms and conditions of employment
Illegal bargaining items: Those that would violate the law, such as payment of wages below the legal minimum
Permissive bargaining items: Includes everything excluding mandatory and illegal
At the Bargaining Table

National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) is empowered by the U.S. Supreme Court to classify bargaining issues into the following three categories of bargaining items (called the Borg-Warner doctrine after the name of the Court’s decision):
Mandatory bargaining items—wages, hours, and terms and conditions of employment; employers and unions have an obligation to bargain over these.
Illegal bargaining items—bargaining items that would violate the law, such as closed shop provisions, policies that involve racial discrimination, or payment of wages below the legal minimum; employers and unions are prohibited from bargaining over such items. These are items that cannot be bargained over legally by either party. These issues violate a law and cannot be entered into a contract legally even if both parties agree. Examples of illegal subjects are: discrimination against a legally recognized group of people; hot cargo clauses (a provision allowing workers to refuse to handle material or goods from a struck facility or on an “unfair” list); closed shop clauses (a provision that all employee are union members before being hired-made illegal under the 1947 Taft-Hartley provisions).
Permissive bargaining item—it is the middle category that includes everything not in the other two (mandatory bargaining items and illegal bargaining items); employers and unions can bargain over permissive items if they choose; but because they are outside the boundaries of the NLRA, the NLRB cannot order bargaining on these issues, and employees are not protected if they go on strike over these issues.
29

7-30
Permissive bargaining items: Includes everything excluding mandatory and illegal
Employer and union can bargain over permissive items if they choose
BUT because they are outside the boundaries of the NLRA, the NLRB cannot order bargaining on these issues.
And employees are not protected if they go on strike over these issues.
At the Bargaining Table

Permissive bargaining items: Includes everything excluding mandatory and illegal
Employer and union can bargain over permissive items if they choose
BUT because they are outside the boundaries of the NLRA, the NLRB cannot order bargaining on these issues.
And employees are not protected if they go on strike over these issues.
30

7-31
Table 7.3 – Examples of Mandatory and Permissive Bargaining Items

Please carefully study Table 7.3 – Examples of Mandatory and Permissive Bargaining Items before taking the quiz on chapter 7 lecture note. Please note that effects of plant closing such as severance package is mandatory bargaining item, but the plant closing itself is a permissive item.
Please also note that compensation or working conditions for current employees are generally mandatory items, but compensation or working conditions for job applicants and retirees are permissive items.
31

Mandatory, permissive or illegal item?

Please take out your lecture note for Chapter 7. and take the quiz. For each of the bargaining items, please indicate if it is a mandatory, permissive , or illegal item
32

7-33
Examples of bargaining items Mandatory, Permissive or Illegal?
1. Health insurance for retired employees  Permissive 
2. Change in retirement plan contributions  Mandatory
3. Seniority provisions  Mandatory
4. Contract ratification procedures  Permissive 
5. Health insurance premiums  Mandatory
6. Wages below minimum wage  Illegal 
7. Straight time pay for overtime hours  Illegal 
8. Employee drug testing  Mandatory
9. Subcontracting work  Mandatory
10. Plant closings  Permissive 
11. Union representation on the board of directors  Permissive 
12. Pension/retirement contributions  Mandatory

Here are the answers for the quiz. How many points did you get?
33

We have come to the end of our lecture today. If you have any questions, please feel free to email me.
See you next class!
34

Chapter 5 Part 2

Labor and Management: Strategies, Structures, and Constraints

Copyright © 2013 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
McGraw-Hill/Irwin

Hi Class, Welcome to Industrial and Labor Relations. Today we are going to discuss Chapter 5 Labor and Management: Strategies, Structures, and Constraints Part 2
1

5-2
What are the two national union federations in the United States?

A quick recap. What are the two national union federations in the United States?
2

5-3
American Federation of Labor–Congress of Industrial Organizations (AFL–CIO)
National union federations

Change to Win federation

That’s right. The two national union federations are American Federation of Labor–Congress of Industrial Organizations (AFL–CIO)
and Change to Win federation
3

5-4
Many union strategies are developed in reaction to managerial strategies;
Two possible management attitudes toward labor unions include:
Union avoidance—the extent to which management works toward remaining nonunion, or becoming nonunion if already unionized.
Union acceptance—the extent to which management accepts, perhaps begrudgingly, the presence of a union or a drive to establish a union.
Management Strategies

Now let’s discuss the management strategies.
Many union strategies are developed in reaction to managerial strategies;
two possible management attitudes toward labor unions include:
Union avoidance refers to —the extent to which management works toward remaining nonunion, or becoming nonunion if already unionized.
Union acceptance refers to—the extent to which management accepts, perhaps begrudgingly, the presence of a union or a drive to establish a union.
Theoretically there is a third possibility: union encouragement, but there is little doubt that except in rare situations, U.S. corporations prefer to be nonunion
4

Union acceptance vs. Union avoidance

Let’s work on two exercise questions. Please click on the video. Is Southwest Airline adopting an union acceptance or union avoidance strategy?
5

Union acceptance

That’s right. Southwest Airline is an example of union acceptance management strategy.
6

Union acceptance vs. Union avoidance
International Association of Machinists and Aerospace Workers

Please click on the video. Is Boeing adopting a union acceptance or union avoidance strategy?
7

Union acceptance vs. Union avoidance
International Association of Machinists and Aerospace Workers

That’s right. Boeing adopts union avoidance strategy.
8

Boeing’s newest plant in South Carolina will remain nonunion after workers there overwhelmingly rejected an effort by the Machinist union to organize the plant.
According to a company statement, more than 2,000 of the nearly 3,000 Boeing workers at the plant eligible to vote in the closely watched election voted against the union, and only a bit more than 700 members voted yes.

Boeing’s newest plant in South Carolina will remain nonunion after workers there overwhelmingly rejected an effort by the Machinist union to organize the plant.
According to a company statement, more than 2,000 of the nearly 3,000 Boeing workers at the plant eligible to vote in the closely watched election voted against the union, and only a bit more than 700 members voted yes.
9

5-10
Table 5.5 – Human Resources Patterns and Labor Relations Strategies

Table 5.5 summarizes the Human Resources Patterns and Labor Relations Strategies
10

5-11
A cost leadership seeks to minimize labor costs
Equity and voice are seen in market-based terms, and efficiency is paramount
A differentiation business strategy empowers employees to create a loyal and productive workforce
Equity and voice are important components of this strategy because of fair treatment and protective
Business Strategies

It is common to divide business strategies into the following two general types:
Cost leadership strategies (emphasizing low cost)—likely pursued through a human resources strategy that seeks to minimize labor costs; efficiency stems from low costs and high output, so labor is driven and treated as a commodity or machine; equity and voice are seen in market-based terms, and efficiency is paramount. Such approaches are consistent with the well-known Theory X of management, in which workers are assumed to dislike work and must therefore be commanded and controlled through threats of punishment. The result is a human resources approach that is largely autocratic.
Differentiation strategies (emphasizing product quality and features)—likely pursued through a human resources strategy that develops, rewards, and perhaps even empowers employees to create a loyal and productive workforce; equity and voice are important components of this strategy because fair treatment and protective benefits (equity) and individual voice mechanisms such as open-door policies can foster loyalty, satisfaction, and therefore productivity; this human resources strategy is consistent with Theory Y, in which managers motivate employees by establishing conditions of commitment and responsibility. More extensive approaches might even employ a strategic business partner HR strategy in which employees are seen as a source of competitive advantage; employees are thus empowered in high-performance workplaces. In management theory this approach is similar to Theory Z, which features participative decision making. The overall approach is paternalistic.
11

5-12
Labor relations strategies
Autocratic and paternalistic/strategic patterns reveal the importance of managerial attitudes toward unions
Management does not seek to oust the union
Management Strategies

Labor Relations Strategies
The autocratic and paternalistic/strategic patterns help reveal the importance of managerial attitudes toward unions.
Management does not seek to oust the union

12

5-13
Union acceptance: A union acceptance strategy in an autocratic organization
Adversarial negotiations; strikes and grievance activity
Management does not seek to oust the union.
Management Strategies

A union acceptance strategy in an autocratic organization would likely consist of adversarial negotiations in which labor and management negotiators challenge and threaten each other during negotiations; strikes and grievance activity would also be expected to be higher than average as management fights to keep labor costs down and unions react to this aggressiveness.
But management does not seek to oust the union.
13

5-14
Union suppression: A union avoidance strategy in an autocratic organization
Tactics include
Harassment, demotion, or firing of union supporters
Plant closings, outsourcing, bankruptcies, double-breasting
To decertify (kick out) the union
Engaging in surface bargaining
(going through the motions without intending to reach agreement)
Using permanent strike replacements to take the jobs of union supporters

Management Strategies

A union acceptance strategy in an autocratic organization would likely consist of adversarial negotiations in which labor and management negotiators challenge and threaten each other during negotiations; strikes and grievance activity would also be expected to be higher than average as management fights to keep labor costs down and unions react to this aggressiveness.
But management does not seek to oust the union.
However, a union avoidance strategy in an autocratic organization is union suppression. Some might call this union busting. Union suppression tactics may include harassment, demotion, or firing of union supporters. This behavior is illegal in the United States, but is nevertheless common.
A set of union suppression tactics involves either proactively or reactively shifting work from locations that are unionized (or are threatening to unionize):
Union suppression Tactics include harassment, demotion, or firing of union supporters
Union suppression Tactics also include
Plant closings
Outsourcing
Bankruptcies
Double-breasting which refers to (the opening of nonunion operations in the same market, a popular strategy in construction).
An aggressive union suppression strategy in a unionized workplace might include the following tactics:
To decertify (kick out) the union
Engaging in surface bargaining (going through the motions without intending to reach agreement)
Using permanent strike replacements to take the jobs of union supporters

14

5-15
Union substitution: In a paternalistic/strategic organization, a union avoidance strategy
Management adopts policies and practices to keep unions out by making them unnecessary
Employees are made to feel like they are part of the organization
They have voice, with information sharing and participatory mechanisms
Quality circles
Management Strategies

In a paternalistic/strategic organization, a union avoidance strategy is union substitution in which management adopts policies and practices to keep unions out by making them unnecessary; some of the central features of this strategy include the following:
Paying above-market wages and benefits (often comparable to unionized compensation packages)
Providing employment security
Giving employees opportunities for training and development
Instituting informal grievance procedures or at least complaint mechanisms
Authoritarian supervision is replaced with more respectful, coaching methods of supervision, and attitude surveys are used to monitor employee satisfaction.
Employees are made to feel like they are part of the organization, and have voice, with information sharing and participatory mechanisms such as quality circles.
Through these equity and voice mechanisms, employers hope to create not only loyal and productive workers, but also workers who feel they do not need a union.
Employees are made to feel like they are part of the organization
They have voice, with information sharing and participatory mechanisms
Such as Quality circles
15

5-16
Exercise (Lecture Notes, Chapter 5)
Table 5.6 – Union Avoidance Tactics
Union Suppression
OR
Union Substitution?

Let’s work on an exercise to check your understanding of the two union avoidance tactics. Please take out your lecture notes and work on Table 5.6 Union Avoidance Tactics.
For each of the 16 union avoidance tactics, please indicate whether it is a case of union suppression or union substitution. Please answer all 16 questions before moving on to the answers in the next slide.
16

Firing or harassing union supporters
Screening out pro-union applicants
Above-market pay and benefits
Opportunities for training and development
Union Avoidance Tactics
Union Suppression vs. Union Substitution

Firing or harassing union supporters
Screening out pro-union applicants
Are Union Suppression
Above-market pay and benefits
Opportunities for training and development
Are Union Substitution
17

Plant closings or bankruptcy
Subcontracting or outsourcing
Respectful supervision
Complaint or grievance procedures
Union Avoidance Tactics
Union Suppression vs. Union Substitution

Plant closings or bankruptcy
Subcontracting or outsourcing
Are Union Suppression
Respectful supervision
Complaint or grievance procedures
Are Union Substitution

18

Investing in nonunion sites
Surface bargaining
Employment security
Attitude surveys
Union Avoidance Tactics
Union Suppression vs. Union Substitution

Investing in nonunion sites
Surface bargaining
Are Union Suppression
Employment security
Attitude surveys
Are Union Substitution
19

Using permanent strikes replacements
Facilitating decertification
Information sharing
Consultation/ participation mechanisms
Union Avoidance Tactics
Union Suppression vs. Union Substitution

Using permanent strikes replacements
Facilitating decertification
Are Union Suppression
Information sharing
Consultation/ participation mechanisms
Are Union Substitution

20

5-21
Table 5.6 – Union Avoidance Tactics

Here is the answer. The 8 tactics on the left are union suppression tactics. The 8 tactics on the right are union substitution tactics.
21

5-22
Employee involvement programs
Work teams, and other practices are jointly established by representatives of management and workers
A union has the potential to better articulate true employee concerns
Individuals will speak more freely when employees are not afraid of management reprisal
Management Strategies

Employee involvement programs
Work teams, and other practices are jointly established by representatives of management and workers
A union has the potential to better articulate true employee concerns
Individuals will speak more freely when employees are not afraid of management reprisal
22

5-23
Labor relations strategies in practice
The history of human resources and industrial relations in the U.S. automobile industry provides examples of different labor relations strategies
In the postwar period the United Auto Workers (UAW) became entrenched at Ford
Resistance to unions became prohibitively expensive
Auto and other manufacturing industries are no longer the pacesetters for the American business
Management Strategies

Henry Ford implemented a form of paternalistic welfare capitalism with his $5-a-day plan in 1914. After a recession in the early 1920s, however, Ford adopted a more antagonistic strategy and aggressively fought any attempts at unionization by its workers for the next 20 years. Ford became famous for its so-called Service Department—essentially an internal police force composed of criminals and informers—which used spying, intimidation, and violence to suppress union activity.
In the postwar period the United Auto Workers (UAW) became entrenched at Ford, and resistance to unions became prohibitively expensive; Ford then adopted a union acceptance strategy that accepted, but sought to contain, the presence of the UAW.
The auto and other manufacturing industries, however, are no longer the pacesetters for the rest of American business.
23

5-24
Labor relations strategies in practice
Some argue that Wal-Mart is creating the template for 21st-century capitalism in the United States and around the world.
Wal-Mart’s human resource strategies fit with the business strategy where policies are centralized and standardized, store managers’ labor costs are carefully policed by Wal-Mart’s headquarters, worker behavior is tightly proscribed, and wages and benefits are low.
Wal-Mart is also aggressively antiunion
Management Strategies

Rather, some argue that Wal-Mart is creating the template for 21st-century capitalism in the United States and around the world.
Wal-Mart’s human resource strategies fit with the business strategy where policies are centralized and standardized, store managers’ labor costs are carefully policed by Wal-Mart’s headquarters, worker behavior is tightly proscribed, and wages and benefits are low.
Wal-Mart is also aggressively antiunion; if a manager suspects any union activity, a rapid response team is dispatched from headquarters to squelch this threat; antiunion videos are shown, supervisors meet with employees one-on-one, employees are closely watched, and union supporters are reportedly fired.
24

5-25
Labor and management must contend with the conflicting strategies, pressures and, opportunities of the labor relations environment
Dimensions include legal, economic, sociopolitical, and ethical
The legal environment
The legal system in every country establishes the framework for labor–management interactions
Clearest component of the legal environment is the set of laws explicitly pertaining to labor relations
The Labor Relations Environment

Labor and management must contend not only with each other’s sometimes conflicting strategies but also with the pressures, constraints, and opportunities of the labor relations environment; the four important
dimensions of this environment are—legal, economic, sociopolitical, and ethical.
The legal environment
The legal system in every country establishes the framework for labor–management interactions
Clearest component of the legal environment is the set of laws explicitly pertaining to labor relations
25

5-26
U.S. employment standards are established by
Fair Labor Standards Act
Civil Rights Act
Occupational Health and Safety Act
Family and Medical Leave Act
The U.S. employment relationship is governed by the employment-at-will doctrine
The Labor Relations Environment

Following are some of the laws that establish some of the U.S. employment standards:
The Fair Labor Standards Act (minimum wages and overtime payments)
The Civil Rights Act (nondiscrimination)
The Occupational Health and Safety Act (workplace safety)
The Family and Medical Leave Act (unpaid leave)
The U.S. employment relationship is governed by the employment-at-will doctrine
The employment-at-will doctrine which govern the U.S. employment relationship is the most significant in labor relations; in the absence of legislative (especially antidiscrimination laws) or contractual restrictions (most widely associated with union contracts), employees can generally be discharged or quit at any time for any reason. This at-will relationship is established by the legal environment.

26

5-27
The economic environment includes:
The labor market
The market for the employer’s products or services
Markets for other factors of production, and
the state of the overall economy
The Labor Relations Environment

The economic environment includes:
The labor market
The market for the employer’s products or services
Markets for other factors of production, and
the state of the overall economy
27

5-28
The economic environment critically determines workers’ employment options
Unemployment is low and jobs are easy to find
A frustrated employee might quit and find a better job elsewhere
labor demand—the strength of an employer’s need for employees
Concession bargaining: Many unions agree to wage, benefit, and work rule concessions to try to save jobs
The Labor Relations Environment

The economic environment critically determines workers’ employment options
If the labor market is tight—that is, if unemployment is low and jobs are easy to find—
a frustrated employee might quit and find a better job elsewhere.
In a weak labor market with high levels of unemployment, employees might be reluctant to form a union for fear of being fired and unable to find a new job; similarly, employees might be less willing to strike when the labor market is weak, and collective bargaining settlements are therefore expected to favor employers.
Another important factor is labor demand—the strength of an employer’s need for employees; it is a demand derived from employers’ competitive positions in markets for their goods and services
Concession bargaining: occurs when Many unions agree to wage, benefit, and work rule concessions to try to save jobs
The sharp increase in the employment in the early 1980s, accompanied an intense period of concession bargaining in which many unions agreed to wage, benefit, and work rule concessions (or givebacks) to try to save jobs; this is a scenario that was recently repeated in the first decade of the 21st century as the major auto companies, airlines, and newspapers teetered on the edge of survival.

28

5-29
Technology affects the relative supply of and demand for various occupations
Skill-biased technological change upgrades the skill requirements of technical jobs
Results in greater demand for high skills
Deskilling technological change reduces the skills required for a specific job
The Labor Relations Environment

Technology also affects the relative supply of and demand for various occupations and is therefore an important element of the labor relations environment; the central debate over technology is whether technological change is skill-biased or deskilling.
Skill-biased technological change—upgrades the skill requirements of technical jobs and results in greater demand for high skills; it is biased in favor of skilled workers; often associated with information technology and is a leading explanation for the increased wage gap between low- and high-skilled workers.
Deskilling technological change—reduces the skills required for a specific job; often associated with scientific management efforts to reduce complex jobs to simple, repetitive tasks and is argued to be a management tool for gaining control of the workplace and enhancing its bargaining power.
29

5-30
The sociopolitical environment
Captures factors from the social and political arenas
Influence labor and management
Employment outcomes can be influenced by public attitudes toward labor unions.
Labor relations environment can favor labor or management depending on the extent of social support for each group
Employment outcomes can be influenced by public attitudes toward labor unions
The Labor Relations Environment

The sociopolitical environment captures factors stemming from the social and political arenas that influence labor and management.
Employment outcomes can be influenced by public attitudes toward labor unions.
Labor relations environment can favor labor or management depending on the extent of social support for each group
Employment outcomes can be influenced by public attitudes toward labor unions
Business and labor can also lobby political leaders for favorable treatment.
Political environment can affect the labor relations environment by making it easier for unions to organize new workplaces.
Some employee groups rely on political lobbying rather than collective bargaining to improve wages and working conditions; because of their shunning of collective bargaining, such groups are often referred to as associations rather than unions; associations can grow into “full-fledged” unions that engage in collective bargaining.

30

Union Approval

Let’s look at two Gallup poll results. The first question asks do you approve or disapprove of labor unions?
Sixty-two percent of Americans approve of labor unions today, which is consistent with the 61% who approved last year and up from 56% in 2016. Before 2017, public support for unions hadn’t exceeded 60% since 2003, when 65% approved.
31

Union Approval

The second question asks would you, personally, like to see labor unions in the United States have more influence than they have today, the same amount as today or less influence than they have today?
More Want Union Strength to Grow Than Shrink
Although a majority of Americans approve of labor unions, fewer want unions’ influence
to grow. About four in 10 (39%) would prefer to see unions have more influence than
they have today; 26% want their influence to stay the same, and 29% would prefer that
they have less influence.
Americans’ preference for union power is nearly identical to what Gallup found a year ago
and represents greater support for strengthening unions than was the case for most of
the previous decade.
32

5-33
Unions represent workers at public utilities
Phone companies can lobby for rate increases and mandated service improvements
Some employee groups rely on political lobbying rather than collective bargaining to improve wages and working conditions
Political environment affected the labor relations environment by making it easier for unions to organize new workplaces
The Labor Relations Environment

Unions represent workers at public utilities
Phone companies can lobby for rate increases and mandated service improvements
Some employee groups rely on political lobbying rather than collective bargaining to improve wages and working conditions
Political environment affected the labor relations environment by making it easier for unions to organize new workplaces
33

5-34
The ethical environment
Business ethics studies moral standards as they apply to the business context
Business ethics is an important motivating force for and potential constraint on behavior
Arguments against labor unions on the grounds that they impair efficiency or intrude on property rights reflect utilitarian and libertarian ethical beliefs.
Arguments for labor unions because they provide equity and voice that respect human dignity, fairness, and the importance of community reflect the ethics of duty, justice, virtue, and care.
The Labor Relations Environment

Business ethics studies moral standards as they apply to the business context and is therefore important for understanding and evaluating labor relations behaviors, policies, and outcomes.
Business ethics should be viewed as a motivating force for and potential constraint on behavior.
The external environment establishes the parameters for decision makers, but specific actions within these parameters result from choices made by individual employees, managers, union leaders, and shareholders; one important influence on these choices is ethics.
Ethics is not just philosophy; it provides an additional framework for a better understanding of labor relations.
Arguments against labor unions on the grounds that they impair efficiency or intrude on property rights reflect utilitarian and libertarian ethical beliefs.
Arguments for labor unions because they provide equity and voice that respect human dignity, fairness, and the importance of community reflect the ethics of duty, justice, virtue, and care.

34

5-35
Table 5.7 – Six Ethical Frameworks

Table 5.7 summarizes six key ethical theories.
35

5-36
The ethical environment: six ethical theories
Utilitarianism – Ethical actions that maximize aggregate welfare
Libertarianism – Emphasizes property rights and freedom from governmental interference
Kantian ethical theory—individuals have a duty to respect human dignity; highlights a concern with how workers are treated.

The Labor Relations Environment

Utilitarianism defines ethical actions as those that maximize aggregate welfare (“utility”) so aggregate economic prosperity is highlighted, irrespective of how it is achieved.
Libertarianism sees actions that infringe on others’ freedoms as unethical, and therefore emphasizes property rights and freedom from governmental (or labor union) interference.
Kantian ethical theory suggests that individuals have a duty to respect human dignity; highlights a concern with how workers are treated.

36

5-37
The ethical environment: six ethical theories
Rawlsian justice ethics—there is an ethical concern for the least well-off; highlights a concern with how workers are treated.
The ethics of virtue and care—highlight the ethical value of our individual actions and our special relationships with others.
The continuing managerial drive for greater flexibility in deploying labor, and the continued resistance by workers and unions, reflect in part a clash between utilitarian concerns with efficiency and Kantian concerns with the quality of human life.

The Labor Relations Environment

Rawlsian justice ethics suggests that there is an ethical concern for the least well-off; highlights a concern with how workers are treated.
The ethics of virtue and care highlight the ethical value of our individual actions and our special relationships with others.
The continuing managerial drive for greater flexibility in deploying labor, and the continued resistance by workers and unions, reflect in part a clash between utilitarian concerns with efficiency and Kantian concerns with the quality of human life.
37

We have come to the end of our lecture today. If you have any questions, please feel free to email me.
See you next class!
38

Chapter 6
Part 1

Union Organizing

Copyright © 2013 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
McGraw-Hill/Irwin

Hi Class, Welcome to Industrial and Labor Relations. Today we are going to discuss Chapter 6 Union Organizing Part 1
In the U.S. labor relations system, if a group of employees wants their employer to bargain with them collectively rather than individually, they typically need to form a union and formally demonstrate that a majority of the employees support the union. This chapter discusses the behavioral, strategic, and legal aspects of this union organizing process.

1

6-2
Discuss the basic procedural steps and legal standards for how new unions are formed in the United States
Explain why individuals vote for or against a union in a representation election
Understand the tactics used by employers to weaken individual support for unions and why these tactics are controversial
Learning Objectives

The learning objectives of chapter 6 are as follows
Discuss the basic procedural steps and legal standards for how new unions are formed in the United States
Explain why individuals vote for or against a union in a representation election
Understand the tactics used by employers to weaken individual support for unions and why these tactics are controversial
2

6-3
Understand the traditional tactics used by unions to strengthen individual support for unions and the pressures for developing new strategies
Compare the pros and cons of the existing certification election process and options for reform
Learning Objectives

Understand the traditional tactics used by unions to strengthen individual support for unions and the pressures for developing new strategies
Compare the pros and cons of the existing certification election process and options for reform
3

6-4
If a group’s request to change a policy is ignored, they can:
They can look for work elsewhere
They can endure the existing policy
They can be disruptive and cause the employer to reconsider
They can try to form a labor union
Introduction

When a group of workers are dissatisfied with certain workplace policies, they may request changes to the policy.
If a group’s request to change a policy is ignored, what can they do?
They can look for work elsewhere
They can endure the existing policy
They can be disruptive and cause the employer to reconsider
They can try to form a labor union

4

6-5
Ways in which a union can be formed
Employees could initiate strike and ask for support
Union supporters could get workers to sign cards or a petition and present results to management
Employees could have a secret ballot election in which the union and employer abide by majority decision
Introduction

A union can be formed in numerous ways:
A few employees could initiate a strike and then round up support (as in the 1930s sit-down strikes)
Union supporters could get workers to sign cards or a petition and present the results to management along with a threat to strike if management ignores their request
The employees could have a secret ballot election in which the union and employer must abide by the decision of the majority
5

6-6
Most U.S. unions are organized (formed) through secret ballot elections administered by the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB).
Representation elections: Employees elect representatives
The most significant type of representation election is a certification election—an election to determine whether a union will be certified as the bargaining agent of the employees.

Introduction

Since the passage of the National Labor Relations Act (NLRA) in 1935, U.S. public policy has favored the last option. Most U.S. unions are organized (formed) through secret ballot elections administered by the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB).
The first major U.S. labor relations process—the organizing process—is therefore principally shaped by the NLRA and the procedural and legal aspects of NLRB elections. These representation elections answer questions of whom the employees want to represent them.
The most significant type of representation election is a certification election—an election to determine whether a union will be certified as the bargaining agent of the employees.
6

6-7
Initiating an organizing drive
Three possible initiators
One or more employees
A union
An employer
The Organizing Time Line

Initiating an Organizing Drive
The first step in union organizing drive is initiation. In theory, there are three possible initiators of an organizing drive:
One or more employee—Low pay, excessive overtime, harsh supervision, lack of respect and voice, or numerous other factors cause dissatisfied employees to talk with each other about forming a union to increase their collective strength; they might try to form a union on their own or, more frequently, contact a union organizer who works for an existing union in their area, industry, or occupation.
A union—unions initiate organizing campaigns by advertising, distributing information, and trying to contact employees to show the benefits of unionization.
An employer—employer-initiated organizing drive interferes with employee free choice and therefore is illegal.
7

6-8
Employee-initiated organizing drive originates from:
Low pay
Excessive overtime
Harsh supervision
Lack of respect and voice
The Organizing Time Line

Employee-initiated organizing drive originates from:
Low pay
Excessive overtime
Harsh supervision
Lack of respect and voice

8

6-9
Get together with your co-workers who may share a common interest in organizing a union.
Talk to a union organizer in order to strategize and to learn the next steps.
Talk to your co-workers to build support for the union.
Show that support through an election or a card-check once you have a strong majority.
https://aflcio.org/formaunion/4-steps-form-union
Four Steps to Get You Started
AFL-CIO

When you and your co-workers come together to form a union, you get the right to negotiate with your employer over wages, benefits and working conditions. 
No matter what the industry you are in, or the labor law that covers it, the process for forming a union is similar.
Get together with your co-workers who may share a common interest in organizing a union.
Talk to a union organizer in order to strategize and to learn the next steps.
Talk to your co-workers to build support for the union.
Show that support through an election or a card-check once you have a strong majority.
Once your union is official, you’ll choose your leaders and negotiate a contract. The process is democratic, and the more inclusive you can be, the stronger your union will be.

http://www.aflcio.org/Learn-About-Unions/How-to-Join-or-Form-a-Union/Four-Steps-to-Get-You-Started

9

6-10
Unions initiate organizing campaigns
By advertising, distributing information, trying to contact employees to show benefits of unionization
Two types of union-initiated campaigns
Strategic campaigns – Organize a workplace and enhance representation of existing employees
Opportunistic campaigns – Increase a union’s membership by organizing dissatisfied workers
The Organizing Time Line

unions initiate organizing campaigns by advertising, distributing information, and trying to contact employees to show the benefits of unionization.
There are two types of union-initiated campaigns: strategic and opportunistic campaigns; strategic campaigns are those in which organizing a particular workplace enhancing a union’s ability to effectively represent existing employees;
opportunistic campaigns attempt to increase a union’s membership by organizing dissatisfied workers who are “ripe” for unionization but who do not have a strategic fit with the existing membership.
10

True / False Questions

Let’s work on 3 practice questions. For each case, please indicate whether it is true or false.
11

1. When the Teamsters Union, one of the largest unions representing truck drivers and other cargo handlers, aggressively tries to organize semi-drivers who are nonunion, their campaign would be best described as strategic, rather than opportunistic, in nature. 
True / False Questions

Question 1.
When the Teamsters Union, one of the largest unions representing truck drivers and other cargo handlers, aggressively tries to organize semi-drivers who are nonunion, their campaign would be best described as strategic, rather than opportunistic, in nature. 
Is it true or false?
12

1. When the Teamsters Union, one of the largest unions representing truck drivers and other cargo handlers, aggressively tries to organize semi-drivers who are nonunion, their campaign would be best described as strategic, rather than opportunistic, in nature. 
TRUE
True / False Questions

The answer is true. the Teamsters Union represents truck drivers and other cargo handlers. Organizing semi-drivers enhances the union’s ability to effectively represent existing employees
13

2. If the U.S. Airline Pilots Association begins to organize a group of food service employees at the Chicago O’Hare airport that is very interested in unionizing, they are engaged in an opportunistic organizing drive.
True / False Questions

Question 2.
If the U.S. Airline Pilots Association begins to organize a group of food service employees at the Chicago O’Hare airport that is very interested in unionizing, they are engaged in an opportunistic organizing drive.
Is it true or false?
14

2. If the U.S. Airline Pilots Association begins to organize a group of food service employees at the Chicago O’Hare airport that is very interested in unionizing, they are engaged in an opportunistic organizing drive.
TRUE
True / False Questions

The answer is true. The U.S. Airline Pilots Association mainly represent pilots. The airport food service employees do not have a strategic fit with the existing membership, pilots.
15

3. The United Food and Commercial Workers International Union, which represents many grocery store employees across the country, decides to aggressively campaign to unionize Walmart employees. This organizing drive is best described as an opportunistic organizing drive. 
True / False Questions

Question 3
The United Food and Commercial Workers International Union, which represents many grocery store employees across the country, decides to aggressively campaign to unionize Walmart employees. This organizing drive is best described as an opportunistic organizing drive. 
Is it true or false?
16

3. The United Food and Commercial Workers International Union, which represents many grocery store employees across the country, decides to aggressively campaign to unionize Walmart employees. This organizing drive is best described as an opportunistic organizing drive. 
FALSE It is strategic organizing drive.
True / False Questions

The answer is false. It is strategic organizing drive. The United Food and Commercial Workers International Union mainly represents many grocery store employees. Walmart employees have a strategic fit with the existing membership
17

The Union Organizing Process

Now let’s discuss the union organizing process. Please click on the video and watch the video on the Union Organizing Process
18

6-19
Figure 6.1 – The Union Organizing Process

Figure 6.1 shows the union organizing process.
19

Here is one example. Southern California Hospital at Hollywood formed their union with SEIU Local 121RN. The Registered Nurses of Southern California Hospital at Hollywood ratified their contract on December 28, 2018
20

The National Labor Relations Board elections results are available online.
21

As you can see, Southern California Hospital at Hollywood held an election on November 3rd, 2017. There were 91 eligible voters, 31 valid voters against unionization and 46 voters voted for the union. The union has won the election.
22

6-23
Building and documenting support
This involves meeting of interested employees outside the workplace and distributing information
The method in U.S. labor relations for showing support is to sign an authorization card
Preprinted form containing a written authorization to represent one for the purposes of collective bargaining
The Organizing Time Line

Building and Documenting Support
Once an organizing drive has been initiated, the next step in the union organizing time line is building support which involves meeting interested employees outside the workplace and distributing information.
If an organizing drive is to continue, employees must concretely express support for having a union represent them.
The most important method in U.S. labor relations for showing this support is to sign an authorization card—a preprinted form which is filled and signed by the employee, describing that he/she authorizes a certain union to represent him/her for the purposes of collective bargaining.
23

6-24
Collecting signed authorization cards is a crucial part of the union organizing process
The cards demonstrate the interest in unionization to three important players:
Union organizers
The employer
The NLRB
Authorization cards show the employer that a majority of employees want union representation.
The Organizing Time Line

Collecting signed authorization cards is a crucial part of the union organizing process
because the cards demonstrate the interest in unionization to three important players—union organizers, the employer, and if necessary, the NLRB.
Authorization cards show the employer that a majority of employees want union representation.
24

6-25
Card check recognition: Recognition based on authorization cards
Gathering signed cards from more than 50 percent of employees, can recognize union as bargaining agent
A neutral party examines the cards and determines if truly more than 50 percent of the employees signed cards
The employer can recognize the union and is then obligated to bargain with the union
This is called voluntary recognition
The Organizing Time Line

Recognition based on authorization cards is called card check recognition or a majority sign-up procedure.
If a union gathers signed cards from more than 50 percent of the employees, it can ask the employer to recognize the union as the bargaining agent of the employees.
If the employers is agreeable, a neutral party can examine the cards and determine if truly more than 50 percent of the employees signed cards.
If so, the employer can recognize the union and is then obligated to bargain with the union. This is called voluntary recognition.
Unions are aggressively pushing for card check recognition procedures, both through legislative action (via the Employee Free Choice Act) that would require employers to accept card check recognition and through agreements with specific companies to voluntarily accept card check recognition.
25

6-26
Alternative to voluntary recognition
Step up the pressure on the company to force it to change its stance
Employees can launch a recognition strike
Strike to compel employer to recognize their union
The NLRA does not ban recognition strikes but tries to make them obsolete
Most recognition questions today are settled through NLRB representation elections rather than through strikes.

The Organizing Time Line

Alternative to voluntary recognition is to
Step up the pressure on the company to force it to change its stance
Employees can launch a recognition strike.
A recognition strike is launched by employees to try to compel the employer to recognize their union.
A major goal of the NLRA is to replace recognition strikes with an orderly alternative. The NLRA does not ban recognition strikes but tries to make them obsolete.
The 1935 passage of the NLRA created a certification procedure in which employees can petition the NLRB for an election to determine if a union has the support of a majority of the employees; the NLRA does not ban recognition strikes per se but rather tries to make them obsolete by giving employees a safer alternative that does not involve lost wages and the risk of being replaced by new employees during a strike.
Most recognition questions today are settled through NLRB representation elections rather than through strikes.

26

Union Organizing:
Authorization Cards:
What percentage of signed authorization cards are required under the NLRB to proceed with an election?

Let’s work on one practice question. Authorization Cards: What percentage of signed authorization cards are required under the NLRB to proceed with an election?
27

During an organizing campaign, union representatives seek employee interest by having the employees sign authorization cards to indicate that the employees want union representation.
At least 30% of the eligible employees in a prospective bargaining unit must sign authorization cards before the NLRB will order an election.
A simple majority of 50% plus one person must vote in favor of union representation in order to win the election. 

During an organizing campaign, union representatives seek employee interest by having the employees sign authorization cards to indicate that the employees want union representation.
At least 30% of the eligible employees in a prospective bargaining unit must sign authorization cards before the NLRB will order an election.
A simple majority of 50% plus one person must vote in favor of union representation in order to win the election. 
28

6-29
Types of elections
Certification election
used in a nonunion location to ascertain if a majority of employees want to become unionized
Decertification election
used to determine whether a majority of unionized employees no longer wish to be represented by their union
All representation elections have the same goal
To determine the wishes of the majority of employees
NLRB Representation Elections

The several types of NLRB representation elections correspond to different questions of representation, but all have the same goal: to determine the wishes of the majority of employees.
Following are two types of election:
Certification election—used in a nonunion location to ascertain if a majority of employees want to become unionized—that is, to designate a specific union as their bargaining agent; it is the most frequent type of election.
Decertification election—used to determine whether a majority of unionized employees no longer wish to be represented by their union; opposite of a certification election; most decertification elections result in a workplace going from union to nonunion.
All representation elections have the same goal
Which is To determine the wishes of the majority of employees
29

6-30
Certification election: Used in a nonunion location to ascertain if a majority of employees want to become unionized
NLRB uses the election results to certify the union as the bargaining agent
Most certification elections have just one union on the ballot
NLRB Representation Elections

Certification election: Used in a nonunion location to ascertain if a majority of employees want to become unionized
NLRB uses the election results to certify the union as the bargaining agent
Most certification elections have just one union on the ballot
30

Table 2 shows the NLRB representation elections and win rates by the 10 most active unions. SEIU, IAM, SPFPA and AFSCME have higher win rates.
31

Table 3 shows the NLRB representation elections and win rates by industry. Union wins are higher in services, transportation, communications and utilities., construction and finance.
32

6-33
Decertification election: Determines whether a majority of unionized employees no longer wish to be represented by their union
Raid election – A small number of decertification elections decertify the existing union and certify a new union
Most decertification elections result in a workplace going from union to nonunion
NLRB Representation Elections

Decertification election—used to determine whether a majority of unionized employees no longer wish to be represented by their union; opposite of a certification election; most decertification elections result in a workplace going from union to nonunion.
Raid election refers to A small number of decertification elections decertify the existing union and certify a new union
Most decertification elections result in a workplace going from union to nonunion
33

Employees may file a petition for decertification (RD) if they believe support for a union has diminished, after collecting signatures from at least 30% of workers in a unit.
A majority of votes decides the outcome.
Decertification Petitions – RD

Employees may file a petition for decertification (RD) if they believe support for a union has diminished, after collecting signatures from at least 30% of workers in a unit.
A majority of votes decides the outcome.
34

6-35
Getting the NLRB to conduct an election
A group of employees or a union must file a petition form with the NLRB
Petition must be supported by 30 percent of the employees for such an election
NLRB Representation Elections

Getting the NLRB to Conduct an Election
Following are the requirements for getting the NLRB to conduct an election:
A group of employees or a union must file a petition form with the NLRB requesting them to conduct the election.
This petition must be supported by a demonstration of sufficient interest among the employees for such an election. “Sufficient interest” is defined by the NLRB as 30 percent. The typical way to demonstrate sufficient interest is to provide signed authorization cards from at least 30 percent of the employees.
35

6-36
NLRB deals with several other details before scheduling elections
Unless in an unusual circumstance, the NLRB will not allow more than 1 election in 12-month period
Elections will not be authorized within 12 months of any union certification
Under the contract bar doctrine, a decertification election cannot be held when there is a valid collective bargaining agreement
NLRB Representation Elections

The NLRB must deal with several other details before scheduling a representation election—
unless there are unusual circumstances, the NLRB will not allow more than one election in a 12-month period;
elections will not be authorized within 12 months of any union certification.
A decertification election cannot be held when there is a valid collective bargaining agreement in place (up to a limit of three years); this is called the contract bar doctrine.
The NLRB must handle the most contentious aspect of the petition—defining the occupations and geographical locations included in a certification election.
36

6-37
Determining the appropriate bargaining unit
When a petition for a certification election is filed with the NLRB, a definition of the relevant jobs and locations is proposed by the party filing the petition.
If the employer objects to this definition, the NLRB must make a determination.
Appropriate bargaining unit: Group of occupations and locations relevant to the certification election
Individuals who are not defined as employees by the NLRA are excluded
NLRB Representation Elections

Determining the Appropriate Bargaining Unit
When a petition for a certification election is filed with the NLRB, a definition of the relevant jobs and locations is proposed by the party filing the petition.
If the employer objects to this definition, the NLRB must make a determination.
Section 9(b) of the NLRA states that the NLRB “shall decide in each case whether, in order to assure to employees the fullest freedom in exercising the rights guaranteed by this Act, the unit appropriate for the purposes of collective bargaining shall be the employer unit, craft unit, plant unit, or subdivision thereof.”
The group of occupations and locations relevant to the certification election is referred to as the appropriate bargaining unit; employees in these occupations can vote in the election and will be represented by the union if the union wins the election.
Individuals who are not defined as employees by the NLRA are excluded

37

6-38
The appropriate unit is determined in the following ways:
Individuals who are not defined as employees by the NLRA, such as supervisors and managers, are excluded from NLRB-defined bargaining units
Jobs that share a community of interest are grouped together.
Ultimately determining the appropriate bargaining unit must be done case by case because the details can vary from one workplace to another.
NLRB Representation Elections

The appropriate unit is determined in the following ways:
Individuals who are not defined as employees by the NLRA, such as supervisors and managers, are excluded from NLRB-defined bargaining units; can be critical if enough employees are excluded.
Jobs that share a community of interest are grouped together.
Ultimately determining the appropriate bargaining unit must be done case by case because the details can vary from one workplace to another.

38

6-39
The supervisor controversy
After much anticipation by unions and employers, the NLRB issued three key decisions in 2006 called the Kentucky River cases
It prompted the NLRB to rethink its approach to determining supervisory status
Increased supervisory exclusions from the NLRA show the continued erosion of employee rights to form labor unions
NLRB Representation Elections

The Supervisor Controversy
The exclusion of supervisors from NLRB-determined bargaining units, and more generally from the NLRA protections, has become particularly important as the skill requirements for many jobs have increased.
Unions fear that companies are intentionally giving employees just enough responsibility to make them legally seen as supervisors with the express intent of removing them from the NLRA protections and thus making it harder for employees to unionize.
Each time this issue is brought before the NLRB, it must determine who is and is not a supervisor by applying the statutory definition contained in the NLRA. Section 2(11) of NLRA defines “supervisor” as any individual having authority, in the interest of the employer, to hire, transfer, suspend, lay off, recall, promote, discharge, assign, reward, or discipline other employees, or responsibly to direct them, or to adjust their grievances, or effectively to recommend such action, if in connection with the foregoing the exercise of such authority is not of a merely routine or clerical nature, but requires the use of independent judgment.
The key legal difficulties are how to interpret these functions and how to weight them.
After much anticipation by unions and employers, the NLRB simultaneously issued three key decisions in 2006. These are called the Kentucky River cases after the name of the Supreme Court ruling that prompted the NLRB to rethink its approach to determining supervisory status. In these cases the NLRB crafted new definitions for assign, responsibly direct, and independent judgment; and in three specific settings it found that permanent charge nurses who frequently assign employees to specific patients are supervisors, rotating charge nurses who occasionally assign employees to patients are not supervisors, other charge nurses who are not accountable for the performance of other nurses are not supervisors, and lead employees in a manufacturing facility whose direction of other employees is largely routine are not supervisors.

39

Collective Bargaining Agreement:
What employee categories are excluded from the bargaining unit?

Now, let’s discuss this important question. What employee categories are excluded from the bargaining unit?
40

Employees excluded from coverage under the National Labor Relations Act (NLRA) include supervisors, managers, confidential employees, and others. Under the NLRA,
A supervisor is defined as someone who uses independent judgment to make personnel decisions or to recommend personnel decisions.
Personnel decisions include hiring, promoting, transferring, rewarding, and terminating employees.
Exclusions

Employees excluded from coverage under the National Labor Relations Act (NLRA) include supervisors, managers, confidential employees, and others. Under the NLRA,
A supervisor is defined as someone who uses independent judgment to make personnel decisions or to recommend personnel decisions.
Personnel decisions include hiring, promoting, transferring, rewarding, and terminating employees.
41

A managerial employee is defined as someone who makes, executes, and exercises independent judgment about management policies. Managerial employees normally do not manage people.
A confidential employee is defined as someone who assists and acts in a confidential capacity to the management personnel who make and implement labor relations policies, or as someone who has regular access to confidential information about future bargaining strategy or changes that the employer anticipates may result from collective bargaining.
Exclusions

A managerial employee is defined as someone who makes, executes, and exercises independent judgment about management policies. Managerial employees normally do not manage people.
A confidential employee is defined as someone who assists and acts in a confidential capacity to the management personnel who make and implement labor relations policies, or as someone who has regular access to confidential information about future bargaining strategy or changes that the employer anticipates may result from collective bargaining.
42

Other employees who are excluded from the bargaining unit include
independent contractors,
agricultural workers,
domestic workers,
people employed by a parent or a spouse,
and public employees.
Exclusions

Other employees who are excluded from the bargaining unit include
independent contractors,
agricultural workers,
domestic workers,
people employed by a parent or a spouse,
and public employees.
43

6-44
Scheduling the election
Elections are supervised and monitored by NLRB officials
They usually take place at the employees’ worksite
Each eligible worker can vote using a secret ballot
NLRB Representation Elections

Once all the details are ironed out—sufficient interest, timeliness, and unit definition—the NLRB will schedule an election
Elections are supervised and monitored by NLRB officials
and usually take place at the employees’ worksite. In special circumstances mail ballots are allowed.
Each eligible worker can vote using a secret ballot
44

6-45
Half of all elections are held within 39 days of a petition being filed
Between filing petition and conducting election, campaigning by unions and employers takes place
Challenges to a unit definition can drastically lengthen the election timetable, and a few elections might not occur until a year or more after a petition is filed.

NLRB Representation Elections

Half of all elections are held within 39 days of a petition being filed
Between filing petition and conducting election, campaigning by unions and employers takes place
Challenges to a unit definition can drastically lengthen the election timetable, and a few elections might not occur until a year or more after a petition is filed.
45

We have come to the end of our lecture today. If you have any questions, please feel free to email me.
See you next class!
46

Chapter 5
Part 1

Labor and Management: Strategies, Structures, and Constraints

Copyright © 2013 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
McGraw-Hill/Irwin

Hi Class, Welcome to Industrial and Labor Relations. Today we are going to discuss Chapter 5 Labor and Management: Strategies, Structures, and Constraints Part 1
The previous two chapters have described the historical development and legal framework of the U.S. labor relations system. This chapter examines the strategies and organizational structures used by labor unions and employers to achieve efficiency and/or equity and/or voice. The extent to which these strategies and structures succeed depends on the constraints of the employment environment, so the employment environment is also briefly discussed here.
1

5-2
Compare the traditional U.S. union strategies and their alternatives
Understand the organizational structure of unions and the labor movement in the United States
Discuss the range of possible management strategies toward labor unions and how they relate to human resource strategies and business strategies
Analyze how the labor relations environment influences and constrains labor relations outcomes
Learning Objectives

The learning objectives of chapter 5 are
1. Compare the traditional U.S. union strategies (especially business unionism, job control unionism, and the servicing model) and their alternatives (especially social unionism, employee empowerment unionism, and the organizing model).
2. Understand the organizational structure of unions and the labor movement in the United States.
3. Discuss the range of possible management strategies toward labor unions and how they relate to human resource strategies and business strategies.
4. Analyze how the labor relations environment, including ethics, influences and constrains labor relations outcomes.
2

5-3
Employees and employers have shared interests
Conflict is natural and to be expected, not pathological and to be suppressed
Labor unions and employers design strategies and build organizational structures to pursue their objectives
Introduction

Employees and employers have shared interests
Conflict is natural and to be expected, not pathological and to be suppressed
Labor unions and employers design strategies and build organizational structures to pursue their objectives
3

5-4
Equity is achieved through:
Generous wage and benefit packages
Seniority-based layoff and promotion procedures
Restrictions on discipline and discharge for just cause only
Due process protections in the grievance procedure
Labor Union Strategies

In the second half of the 20th century, U.S. labor unions primarily followed strategies that comprises of a business unionism philosophy and a servicing model of delivery that are operationalized through job control unionism and industrial unions
Equity is achieved through
generous wage and benefit packages,
seniority-based layoff and promotion procedures,
restrictions on discipline and discharge for just cause only, and
due process protections in the grievance procedure.
4

5-5
Voice is achieved through:
representation at the bargaining table and in the grievance procedure.
Collective bargaining is institutionalized, and the union contract becomes the “workplace rule of law.”
Labor Union Strategies

Voice is achieved through representation at the bargaining table and in the grievance procedure.
Collective bargaining is institutionalized, and the union contract becomes the “workplace rule of law.”
5

5-6
The workplace focus of the business unionism philosophy
Labor and management have experimented with different ways of moving away from the servicing model to an organizing model
Some of these alternatives to job control unionism can be loosely grouped together as employee empowerment unionism
Labor Union Strategies

The workplace focus of the business unionism philosophy
Labor and management have experimented with different ways of moving away from the servicing model to an organizing model
Some of these alternatives to job control unionism can be loosely grouped together as employee empowerment unionism
6

5-7
U.S. labor unions have traditionally embraced a business unionism philosophy
The key to achieving equity and voice is collective bargaining in the workplace
This way unions win wage gains, benefits, grievance procedures, and protective work rules
This philosophy accepts the legitimacy of capitalism and the need for employers to make a profit
Labor Union Strategies

U.S. labor unions have traditionally embraced a business unionism philosophy
The key to achieving equity and voice is collective bargaining in the workplace
This way unions win wage gains, benefits, grievance procedures, and protective work rules
This philosophy accepts the legitimacy of capitalism and the need for employers to make a profit
7

5-8
Social unionism
Sees labor unions as more than workplace mechanisms for winning economic gains;
rather, unions are viewed as an integral participants in a community’s and country’s civic and political activities;
the scope of representation is the broader social and political arena
The pursuit of equity and voice extends to broader concerns of social justice throughout society
Labor Union Strategies

The workplace scope of representation common in U.S. labor relations contrasts with the social unionism philosophy that is frequently observed in Europe.
Adherents to a social unionism philosophy see labor unions as more than workplace mechanisms for winning economic gains; rather, unions are viewed as an integral participants in a community’s and country’s civic and political activities; the scope of representation is the broader social and political arena.
The pursuit of equity and voice extends to broader concerns of social justice throughout society
8

5-9
Social movement unionism, in contrast to social unionism, embraces labor unions as part of a broader social movement of community, social, and political activist groups that relies on active grassroots participation and mobilization.
Social movement unionism is often advocated as a basis for revitalizing the labor movement because rank-and-file activism can provide the means to increase organizing.
Employment relationship is characterized by deep sociopolitical class conflict rather than economic conflicts that can be mediated by workplace
Labor Union Strategies

Social movement unionism, in contrast to social unionism, embraces labor unions as part of a broader social movement of community, social, and political activist groups that relies on active grassroots participation and mobilization.
Social movement unionism in the United States is often advocated as a basis for revitalizing the labor movement because rank-and-file activism can provide the means to increase organizing, especially among traditionally overlooked groups such as immigrant workers, and to resist management demands for concessions.
The sociopolitical activism of social movement unionism is rooted in a belief that the employment relationship is characterized by deep sociopolitical class conflict rather than economic conflicts that can be mediated by workplace
9

5-10
Table 5.1 – Traditional Union Strategies and 21st Century Alternatives

Table 5.1 – listed the key differences between business unionism and social unionism.
Business unionism involves strong workplace unions, collective bargaining is the key in business unionism, business unionism accepts capitalist institutions, equity is achieved through workplace union protection and voice is achieved through workplace union representation.
Social unionism involves strong community networks and focuses on workplace, social and political action. Social unionism is critical of status quo. Equity is achieved through social justice. Voice is achieved through political and social movement.
10

Business Unionism vs Social Unionism?
Demonstrators march through downtown Los Angeles during a Labor Day protest organized by the SEIU in support of a $15 per hour wage. (Michael Owen Baker / For the Times)

Demonstrators march through downtown Los Angeles during a Labor Day protest organized by the SEIU in support of a $15 per hour wage.
11

Business Unionism vs Social Unionism?

Please click on the video and think about this questions. Is the fight for 15 an example of business unionism or social unionism?
12

Social Unionism
Low-wage workers, union activists rally for higher pay and right to organize without fear of retribution
Demonstrators march through downtown Los Angeles during a Labor Day protest organized by the SEIU in support of a $15 per hour wage. (Michael Owen Baker / For the Times)

That’s right. This is an example of social unionism. Low-wage workers, union activists rally for higher pay and right to organize without fear of retribution. The focus is on broad social justice issues.
13

Business Unionism vs Social Unionism?

Please watch the video. Is this an example of business unionism or social unionism?
14

Business Unionism

That’s right. It’s an example of business unions. The focus is on union members’ own workplace.
15

Business Unionism vs Social Unionism?

The essence of trade unionism is social uplift. The labor movement has been the haven for the dispossessed, the despised, the neglected, the downtrodden, the poor. Is this quote an example of business unionism or social unionism?
16

Social Unionism

That’s right. The answer is social unionism which focuses on workplace, social, and political actions and social justice.
17

Business Unionism vs Social Unionism?

Samuel Gompers was the first and longest-serving president of the American Federation of Labor. He famously said “the worst crime against working people is a company which fails to operate at a profit.” Is this quote an example of business unionism or social unionism?
18

President of the American Federation of Labor (AFL) from 1886 
Business Unionism

That’s right. The answer is business unionism which unionism accepts capitalist institutions and focuses on workers’ own workplace.

19

Business Unionism vs Social Unionism?

Eugene Victor was an American socialist, political activist, trade unionist, one of the founding members of the Industrial Workers of the World (IWW) and five times the candidate of the Socialist Party of America for President of the United States.
He said “You have got to unite in the same labor union and in the same political party and strike and vote together, and the hour you do that, the world is yours.” Is this quote an example of business unionism or social unionism?
20

Social Unionism

That’s right. This is an example of social unionism. He urged workers to look beyond their own workplaces and focus on broader social justice issues.
21

5-22
Servicing model
Workers pay dues, and in return they are protected against bad times — arbitrary supervisors, the vagaries of markets, workplace accidents, and the like.
Workers do not participate in a union; they consume union services
Workers are serviced by union officials, that is, problems are solved for the workers, not by the workers.
This is a passive form of employee representation; the only active participants are union officials.

Labor Union Strategies

To carry out their business unionism philosophy. U.S. labor unions traditionally have represented workers by using a servicing model. Here a union is like an insurance company in which workers pay dues, and in return they are protected against bad times—arbitrary supervisors, the vagaries of markets, workplace accidents, and the like.
Some of the features of a servicing model include the following:
Workers do not participate in a union; rather, they consume union services, especially collectively bargained contracts and representation in the grievance procedure.
Workers are serviced by union officials, that is, problems are solved for the workers, not by the workers.
This is a passive form of employee representation; the only active participants are union officials.
22

5-23
Organizing model
Unions as institutions of active worker participation, empowerment, and mobilization.
Organizing drives to unionize nonunion workers are not led solely by full-time union staff members, but rely heavily on internal organizers.
Workers play an active part in resolving their own problems
They participate in their attainment and continually serve as internal organizers to create vibrant unions.
This is an active form of representation, and the soul of the representation process consists of the rank-and-file union members.

Labor Union Strategies

Some argue that unions should embrace an organizing model.
This approach views unions as institutions of active worker participation, empowerment, and mobilization.
Organizing drives to unionize nonunion workers are not led solely by full-time union staff members, but rely heavily on internal organizers.
Once unionized, problems are not solved for workers as in the servicing model; rather, workers play an active part in resolving their own problems.
Workers do not consume equity and voice; they participate in their attainment and continually serve as internal organizers to create vibrant unions.
This is an active form of representation, and the soul of the representation process consists of the rank-and-file union members.
23

5-24
The servicing model sees the relationship between a worker and his or her union as a narrow economic exchange that develops only weak ties between leaders and union members;
The organizing model sees this as a social exchange with the potential for developing strong social ties not only between leaders and members, but also among members.

Labor Union Strategies

The servicing model sees the relationship between a worker and his or her union as a narrow economic exchange that develops only weak ties between leaders and union members;
the organizing model sees this as a social exchange with the potential for developing strong social ties not only between leaders and members, but also among members.
24

5-25
Table 5.1 – Traditional Union Strategies and 21st Century Alternatives

Under the serving model, workers pay dues in return for protection through collective bargaining and grievance procedures. By contrast, under organizing model, unions mobilize workers for empowerment and action.
Under the serving model, workers consume union services. By contrast, under organizing model, workers participate in union and workplace activities including organizing.
25

5-26
Job control unionism
Unions have sought to protect their members from volatile managers and markets
They negotiate detailed legalistic union contracts that tie employee rights to narrowly defined jobs while removing labor from business decision making
Labor Union Strategies

Through much of the 20th century, the dominant method of work organization was scientific management, in which jobs were divided into specialized tasks. Employers have traditionally been adamant about maintaining their managerial prerogatives—discipline, production, scheduling, marketing, pricing, investment, and other managerial functions.
In this environment, unions have sought to protect their members from volatile managers and markets by negotiating detailed, legalistic union contracts that tie employee rights to narrowly defined jobs while removing labor from business decision making. This is called job control unionism because a central element is replacing arbitrary management control with union-negotiated seniority systems for allocating jobs and determining pay and benefits.
26

5-27
Employee empowerment unionism
Rather than establishing standardized outcomes, employee empowerment unionism establishes the framework of procedures in which workers are empowered to determine their own outcomes.
An example of employee empowerment unionism is skill-based pay where labor and management negotiate the parameters of the system, and workers are responsible for upgrading their skills and reaping rewards for doing so.
Labor Union Strategies

Some of these alternatives to job control unionism can be loosely grouped together as employee empowerment unionism.
Rather than establishing standardized outcomes, such as tying wages to jobs or layoffs to seniority as are typical in job control unionism, employee empowerment unionism establishes the framework of procedures in which workers are empowered to determine their own outcomes.
An example of employee empowerment unionism is skill-based pay where labor and management negotiate the parameters of the system, and workers are responsible for upgrading their skills and reaping rewards for doing so.
27

5-28
Table 5.1 – Traditional Union Strategies and 21st Century Alternatives

In summary, job control unionism focuses on specific job rights, seniority and job classification are important, equity is achieved through standardization and equal treatment, voice is achieved through union representatives.
By contrast, employee empowerment unionism focuses on creating procedures for empowerment. Skills are important. Equity is achieved through fair processes and voice is achieved through employee empowerment.
28

5-29
Craft unionism – Involves a single union representing only workers in a single occupation or craft
Also called occupational unionism
Example: separate unions for electricians, carpenters, and painters
Industrial unionism – Focuses on an industry rather than a craft
Seek to represent workers of all occupations within an industry
Labor Union Strategies

Another dimension to union strategy is whether unions represent workers along craft/occupational or industrial lines. Craft unionism, or occupational unionism, involves a single union representing only workers in a single occupation or craft,
such as separate unions for electricians, carpenters, and painters; this was common before the rise of the modern factory, and it remains prevalent today in the construction industry.
Industrial unionism focuses on an industry rather than a craft.
Industrial unions seek to represent workers of all occupations within an industry.
29

5-30
Table 5.1 – Traditional Union Strategies and 21st Century Alternatives

In summary, industrial unionism represent all workers at a single workplace or company, bargaining power is derived from controlling the entire workplace or company.
By contrast, craft or occupational unionism represent workers in a single occupation such as electricians, carpenters, and painters in different workplaces or nurses in different hospitals. Occupational unions are responsive to a homogenous occupation.
30

5-31
Alternative union strategies for the 21st century
The traditional collection of union strategies combines a workplace focus with passive rank-and-file participation
A business unionism focus on collective bargaining is a workplace scope of representation
Alternative approach embracing community and social activism represents a broader social scope
Labor Union Strategies

The traditional union strategies are under great pressure to change in the 21st century. These pressures come from changes in the external business environment and also from critics within the labor movement itself.
On the business side, management has been fighting the rigidities of the job control unionism since the 1980s because of the greater needs for flexibility and quality that have arisen with increased foreign and nonunion competition.
A desire to revitalize a weakened labor movement has caused some labor movement supporters to criticize the conservatism of the longstanding business unionism philosophy along with the union member apathy that is created by the passivity of the servicing model.
So what are the Alternative union strategies for the 21st century?
The traditional collection of union strategies combines a workplace focus with passive rank-and-file participation
A business unionism focus on collective bargaining is a workplace scope of representation
Alternative approach embracing community and social activism represents a broader social scope
31

5-32
Table 5.2 – The Soul and Scope of Employee Representation

To understand the different dimensions of union strategies it is important to distinguish between the scope and the soul of employee representation; the scope of representation describes the breadth of the representation activities—in particular, whether union activity is concentrated in the workplace or in the broader political and social arenas; the soul of representation captures how the representation is pursued or delivered, especially regarding the extent of rank-and-file participation (as shown in Table 5.2).
32

5-33
There are significant regional differences in union membership
Southern and southwestern states have the lowest union densities
Northern industrial states have the highest
The Structure of the U.S. Labor Movement

Now, let’s study the Structure of the U.S. Labor Movement
There are significant regional differences in union membership
Southern and southwestern states have the lowest union densities
Northern industrial states have the highest
33

Chart 1 shows the union membership rates by state in 2018.
In 2018, 29 states and the District of Columbia had union membership rates below that of the U.S.
average, 10.5 percent, while 20 states had rates above it and 1 state had the same rate. All states in both
the East South Central and West South Central divisions had union membership rates below the national
average, while all states in both the Middle Atlantic and Pacific divisions had rates above it.
Eight states had union membership rates below 5.0 percent in 2018. North Carolina and South Carolina
had the lowest rate (2.7 percent each). The next lowest rates were in Utah (4.1 percent) and Texas and
Virginia (4.3 percent each). Two states had union membership rates over 20.0 percent in 2018: Hawaii
(23.1 percent) and New York (22.3 percent).
The largest numbers of union members lived in California (2.4 million) and New York (1.9 million).
Over half of the 14.7 million union members in the U.S. lived in just seven states (California, 2.4
million; New York, 1.9 million; Illinois, 0.8 million; Pennsylvania, 0.7 million; and Michigan, Ohio, and
Washington, 0.6 million each), though these states accounted for only about one-third of wage and
salary employment nationally
34

5-35
Local union structures
Most union members have the greatest contact with their local union
Workers from a single workplace
Workers in a single occupation from several workplaces
Multiple occupations in multiple workplaces in multiple industries
Nearly all local unions are part of a national union
Local union may be an independent organization and not part of a national union
The Structure of the U.S. Labor Movement

Most union members have the greatest contact with their local union.
A local union may represent many workers from a single workplace (an industrial local), workers in a single occupation from several workplaces (a craft local), or multiple occupations in multiple workplaces in multiple industries (an amalgamated local).
Most worksites also have one or more elected or appointed shop stewards who are the primary point of contact for most unionized employees; the stewards’ most important responsibility is processing grievances that have been filed within their work groups.
Local unions are governed by a president and executive committee who are democratically elected; there may also be a negotiation committee and a grievance committee; some local unions may be active in local politics and in trying to organize new members.
Nearly all local unions are part of a national union; some, however, may be an independent organization and not part of a national union.
35

5-36
National union structures – National unions charter the local unions and often have final approval authority over local actions
National unions are responsible for:
Organizing new members,
Providing research and training,
lobbying legislators,
providing strike benefits,
Supervising the collective bargaining process
The Structure of the U.S. Labor Movement

National Union Structures
There are approximately 100 national unions in the United States. The largest are the National Education Association (NEA) with over 3.2 million members and the Teamsters, United Food and Commercial Workers (UFCW), Service Employees International Union (SEIU), and American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees (AFSCME), each with over 1 million members.
Some national unions are called “internationals” because they also have locals in Canada; for example, the UFCW’s full name is the United Food and Commercial Workers International Union.
While local unions are the focal point of most rank-and-file members’ contact with the union, the greatest power and authority generally lie with the national unions.
National unions charter the local unions and often have final approval authority over local actions.
Most national unions are responsible for the following functions:
Organizing new members
Providing research and training
Lobbying legislators
Providing strike benefits
Supervising the collective bargaining process
36

5-37
National unions are governed through traditional democratic methods
National union officers are periodically elected
When bargaining with larger companies, the national union may directly handle collective bargaining;
with smaller companies, a local union’s negotiating committee may take the lead, but often with the support and advice of a national union staff member.
The Structure of the U.S. Labor Movement

National unions, like local unions, are governed through traditional democratic methods;
national union officers are periodically elected either directly by the membership or indirectly through elected delegates;
overall policy directions and changes to the constitution are made through periodic conventions attended by delegates elected by the union’s membership.
When bargaining with larger companies, the national union may directly handle collective bargaining; with smaller companies, a local union’s negotiating committee may take the lead, but often with the support and advice of a national union staff member.
Although unions have increased their use of formal human resources, financial, and strategic planning processes, improving the management and strategic planning skills of union leaders is needed.
Historically it was easy to distinguish between national craft unions representing workers in a single craft and national industrial unions representing all workers in a single industry. But unions have diversified and merged over the years, so there is now less of a distinction.

37

5-38
U.S. unions represent workers from diverse occupations and industries
U.S. unions are general unions and true industrial or craft unions
The pros and cons of general unions
The strength that the national unions gain by diverse organizing activity outweighs the potential problems of individual workers
Rival unionism: Union competition for members
The Structure of the U.S. Labor Movement

U.S. unions represent workers from diverse occupations and industries
U.S. unions are general unions and true industrial or craft unions
The Pros and Cons of General Unions
One persistent question for the U.S. labor movement is whether the increased strength that the national unions gain by increasing their membership and financial base through mergers and diverse organizing activity outweighs the potential problems with being responsive to the increasingly disparate needs and situations of individual workers.
Opportunistic mergers and organizing activity are criticized and characterized as “nickel-and-dime business unionism” that lacks a coherent strategy for representing diverse workers; also, mergers do not always go smoothly.
A related question relates to union competition for members, or rival unionism. Merger activity reduces interunion competition. But diverse organizing activity among general unions increases competition among unions.
The question for the labor movement is whether this competition is a waste of precious resources or whether it causes better representation; perhaps the benefits of competition that cause corporations to innovate and strive for better goods and services also apply to labor unions.
38

5-39
Figure 5.1 – The Structure of the U.S. Labor Movement

National unions generally comprises of the following:
Departments—consist of specialized staff in important functional areas; common departments include organizing, collective bargaining, research, education or training, and government affairs.
Divisions or conferences—focus on important industries or occupations within a national union and provide the opportunity for coordination and networking within these areas.
Regions—consist of regional or district offices to serve the local unions.

39

Local unions are like state governments—they have their own elected officials and can pursue their own policies and conduct their own activities, subject to the ultimate approval of a superior authority.
National unions are like the federal government—they have the ultimate authority.
The AFL–CIO is like the United Nations—it provides overall leadership and important services, but membership is voluntary; neither the AFL–CIO nor the United Nations has the authority to compel its members to comply with its decisions.
The Structure of the U.S. Labor Movement

To further appreciate the power structure of the U.S. labor movement, it is instructive to compare it to the levels of government in the United States.
Local unions are like state governments—they have their own elected officials and can pursue their own policies and conduct their own activities, subject to the ultimate approval of a superior authority.
National unions are like the federal government—they have the ultimate authority.
The AFL–CIO is like the United Nations—it provides overall leadership and important services, but membership is voluntary; neither the AFL–CIO nor the United Nations has the authority to compel its members to comply with its decisions.
40

5-41
National and international union federations
Structure of each country’s labor movement is one or more national labor federations
Labor federation is an association of labor unions providing support to the labor movement
The Structure of the U.S. Labor Movement

At the top of the structure of each country’s labor movement is one or more national labor federations.
A labor federation is an association of labor unions that provides support and leadership to the labor movement
41

5-42
American Federation of Labor–Congress of Industrial Organizations (AFL–CIO)
National union federations

Change to Win federation

So what are the two national union federations in the U.S.?
The American Federation of Labor–Congress of Industrial Organizations (AFL–CIO) was a major national labor federation in the United States between 1955 and 2005; it consists of 56 national unions that represent 10.5 million workers; a fraction of the union dues collected by each member union is forwarded to the AFL–CIO to fund its operations.
 Change to Win Federation is a coalition of American labor unions originally formed in 2005 as an alternative to the AFL-CIO. The coalition is associated with strong advocacy of the organizing model. The Change to Win Federation is a democratic federation of labor unions representing more than 5.5 million working men and women. 
42

5-43
The AFL–CIO plays an important leadership role in the direction and coordination of the U.S. labor movement
Organizing, negotiating, and grievance handling is done by local and national unions
it consists of 56 national unions that represent 10.5 million workers
The Structure of the U.S. Labor Movement

The American Federation of Labor–Congress of Industrial Organizations (AFL–CIO) was a major national labor federation in the United States between 1955 and 2005; it consists of 56 national unions that represent 10.5 million workers; a fraction of the union dues collected by each member union is forwarded to the AFL–CIO to fund its operations. The AFL–CIO plays an important leadership role in the direction and coordination of the U.S. labor movement
The AFL–CIO is like the United Nations—it provides overall leadership and important services, but membership is voluntary; neither the AFL–CIO nor the United Nations has the authority to compel its members to comply with its decisions.
AFL-CIO is responsible for Organizing, negotiating, and grievance handling is done by local and national unions
it consists of 56 national unions that represent 10.5 million workers;

43

5-44
The AFL–CIO’s main functions are:
Political lobbying
Research
Education
Overall coordination and direction
The Structure of the U.S. Labor Movement

The AFL–CIO’s main functions are:
Political lobbying
Research
Education
Overall coordination and direction

44

5-45
Figure 5.2 – AFL–CIO Organization Chart

Figure 5.2 presents the AFL–CIO Organization Chart
Following are some of the features of the organizational structure of the AFL–CIO:
Specialized departments called programmatic departments—include civil and human rights, international affairs, organizing, and several pertaining to the AFL–CIO’s political function (legislative, political, and public policy).
Divisions for specific industries or occupations called trade and industrial departments—include building and construction trades, food and allied services, maritime trades, and professional employees.
45

5-46
Competing national union federations
Continued decline of the U.S. labor movement led to unusually open and pointed calls for a change in leadership of the AFL-CIO
Presidents pressed for shifting the AFL–CIO’s from political activities to organizing activities
Resulted in several unions leaving the AFL–CIO and forming the Change to Win federation
The Structure of the U.S. Labor Movement

Frustration with the continued decline of the U.S. labor movement led to unusually open and pointed calls for a change in the direction and leadership of the AFL–CIO in 2004.
Presidents pressed for shifting the AFL–CIO’s from political activities to organizing activities
Several union presidents wanted to see the AFL–CIO rationalize the structure of the labor movement by consolidating smaller unions and refocusing the diffuse energy of general unions toward specific core jurisdictions like the industrial unions of the 1930s.
The calls for change combined with significant rivalries among various union leaders resulted in several unions leaving the AFL–CIO in 2005 and forming a new labor federation, the Change to Win federation—includes only seven unions, but they are among the largest and represent a total of 6 million workers.
The breakup of the AFL–CIO rippled throughout the structure of the labor movement, especially at the local and state levels, where AFL–CIO–affiliated central labor councils and state federations were forced to expel local unions affiliated with Change to Win.
The national AFL–CIO created a “Solidarity Charter” program in which local unions from the Change to Win federation are allowed to be part of the local and state AFL–CIO bodies.
46

Over 5.5 million workers
Affiliated Unions
International Brotherhood of Teamsters (IBT)
Service Employees International Union (SEIU)
United Farm Workers of America (UFW)
United Food and Commercial Workers International Union (UFCW)
Change to Win Federation

The Change to Win Organizing Center (CtW) is a coalition of American labor unions originally formed in 2005 as an alternative to the AFL-CIO.
Over 5.5 million workers united to create Change to Win 
The coalition is associated with strong advocacy of the organizing model. The coalition currently consists of The International Brotherhood of Teamsters (IBT); Service Employees International Union (SEIU); and United Farm Workers (UFW). Communications Workers of America (CWA) is affiliated with both CtW[2] and AFL-CIO.
47

5-48
Union democracy
Democracy in unions is championed because of the belief that democratic unions more effectively represent their members
Analyzed along three dimensions
Procedural,
Behavioral,
Substantive
The Structure of the U.S. Labor Movement

A primary role of labor unions is to provide voice. This makes it imperative for unions to be democratic; democracy in unions is also championed because of the belief that democratic unions more effectively represent their members.
Union democracy can be analyzed along the following three dimensions:
Procedural—procedurally, U.S. law (the Landrum–Griffin Act of 1959) mandates basic democratic procedures within unions, including free speech and election provisions.
Behavioral—behaviorally, unions appear to be more democratically vibrant at the local than the national level.
Substantive—even if officer turnover is low, however, the presence of opposition can keep leadership responsive to its membership.

48

5-49
Managerial pressures for employee involvement in workplace decision making undermine union democracy by:
Eroding employee commitment to their union
Lowering participation in union affairs
The Structure of the U.S. Labor Movement

Managerial pressures for employee involvement in workplace decision making can also undermine union democracy
by eroding employee commitment to their union and
lowering participation in union affairs.
49

We have come to the end of our lecture today. If you have any questions, please feel free to email me.
See you next class!
50

Chapter 9.1

Contract Clauses and Their Administration

Copyright © 2013 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
McGraw-Hill/Irwin

Hi Class, Welcome to Industrial and Labor Relations. Today we are going to discuss Chapter 9 Contract Clauses and Their Administration Part 1
The primary objective of most U.S. unions is to negotiate contracts with employers that specify wages, hours, and other terms and conditions of employment. The labor relations processes described in the previous chapters—union organizing, bargaining, and dispute resolution—largely lead the parties to such a contract. This chapter describes the types of clauses that are frequently found in union contracts and also how disputes over the application of these clauses are resolved.
This chapter describes the major elements of traditional union contracts in U.S. labor relations, including the grievance procedure that is used to administer contracts by enforcing and resolving disputes over clauses in the rest of the contract. Particular attention is paid to employee rights and obligations, job rights and obligations, union rights and obligations, as well as management rights and obligations.

1

9-2
Understand the nature of U.S. union contracts
Explain important contractual provisions that attach rights and obligations to employees, jobs, unions, and employers
Outline how grievances are resolved – that is, how contracts are administered
Learning Objectives

The learning objective of chapter 9 are
1st. Understand the nature of U.S. union contracts.
2nd. Explain important contractual provisions that attach rights and obligations to employees, jobs, unions, and employers.
3rd. Outline how grievances are resolved—that is, how contracts are administered.
2

9-3
Discuss the importance of grievance arbitration in U.S. labor relations
Analyze the pressures for changing the nature of U.S. union contracts and how they are administered
Learning Objectives

4th. Discuss the importance of grievance arbitration in U.S. labor relations.
5th. Analyze the pressures for changing the nature of U.S. union contracts and how they are administered.
3

9-4
It is believed that workplace justice and efficiency are best achieved through written workplace rules enforced by private system of workplace dispute resolution
Under the employment-at-will doctrine, employers are free to establish whatever terms and conditions for employment to discharge workers at any time
Unions have long sought to protect workers by restricting this absolute authority
The result is detailed, legally enforceable union contracts enforced by grievance arbitration
Introduction

Contracts are central to U.S. labor relations because of the belief that workplace justice and efficiency are best achieved through written workplace rules enforced by a private system of workplace dispute resolution.
Under the employment-at-will doctrine, employers are generally free to establish whatever terms and conditions of employment they desire and to discharge workers at any time (and employees are free to quit at any time).
Unions have long sought to protect workers by restricting this absolute authority.
The result is detailed, legally enforceable union contracts enforced by grievance arbitration.
4

9-5
Workers fought for workplace justice in the early decades of the 1900s
Frequently tried to force their employers to follow impartial rules:
Wages that were based on jobs rather than unfair manipulation of piece rates
Promotions and layoffs based on seniority rather than managerial favoritism and discrimination
This was a way of “introducing civil rights into industry requiring that management be conducted by rule rather than by arbitrary decision”
U.S. Union Contracts

In the early decades of the 1900s, workers introduced civil rights into the industries requiring management to be conducted by rule rather than by arbitrary decision. An alternative quest for workplace justice focused on shop floor militancy and union control of work standards backed up by spontaneous strikes and slowdowns.
Many union and corporate leaders preferred the rules-based approach, which supported management’s desire for stability and discipline and also fulfilled union leaders’ needs for countering managerial authority without having to resort to wildcat strikes that could undermine their own leadership positions.
Workers frequently tried to force their employers to follow impartial rules:
Wages that were based on jobs rather than unfair manipulation of piece rates
Promotions and layoffs based on seniority rather than managerial favoritism and discrimination
This was a way of “introducing civil rights into industry requiring that management be conducted by rule rather than by arbitrary decision”

5

9-6
Today’s union contracts
Legally enforceable documents that specify the laws of the workplace in great detail
Most contracts have a duration of three years
Some contracts include a reopener clause by which the parties can reopen the contract during its life to negotiate wage or benefit adjustments
Most contracts are renegotiated upon expiration
U.S. Union Contracts

Today’s union contracts
Legally enforceable documents that specify the laws of the workplace in great detail
Most contracts have a duration of three years
Some contracts include a reopener clause by which the parties can reopen the contract during its life to negotiate wage or benefit adjustments
Most contracts are renegotiated upon expiration
6

Here is a cartoon about union contract.
7

9-8
The centerpiece of U.S. labor relations has been union contracts that specify the rights and responsibilities of employees
The U.S. labor relation system revolves around these contracts
Despite the detailed nature of many contract clauses, they can never anticipate or remove every ambiguity for all scenarios that will arise during the life of the contract
Introduction

The centerpiece of U.S. labor relations has been union contracts that specify the rights and responsibilities of employees
The U.S. labor relation system revolves around these contracts
Despite the detailed nature of many contract clauses, they can never anticipate or remove every ambiguity for all scenarios that will arise during the life of the contract
8

9-9
Contract administration – Interpreting, applying, and resolving conflicts regarding collective bargaining agreements
It is critical process in U.S. labor relations and involves rights disputes
Rights disputes – Disagreements over whether someone’s rights as specified in the contract have been violated
Introduction

Interpreting, applying, and resolving conflicts regarding collective bargaining agreements are called contract administration and are a critical process in U.S. labor relations.
It is critical process in U.S. labor relations and involves rights disputes
Contract administration involves rights disputes. Rights disputes are disagreements over whether someone’s rights as specified in the contract have been violated; rights disputes are grievances—conflicts over the administration (that is, the application and interpretation) of the contract.
9

9-10
Table 9.1 – The Major Components of Traditional U.S. Union Contract

Table 9.1 lists the major components of traditional U.S. union contracts.
 Employee rights include:
Just discipline and discharge.
Seniority rights in layoffs, promotions, etc.
Compensation(benefits, call-in pay, etc.)
Fair hearing through the grievance procedure
Employee rights obligations include:
Obey work rules
Follow supervisor’s orders
Abide by the contract
Accept arbitrators’ awards
Job Rights include:
Job holders entitled to a certain wage rate
Specific tasks must be done within the bargaining unit and by certain jobs
Job Rights obligations include:
Fulfill job standards
Union Rights include:
Exclusive bargaining agent
Union leader access to the workplace
Union bulletin board in the workplace
Shop stewards
Union security and dues checkoff clauses
Union Rights obligations include:
Abide by the contract, including not striking over grievances
Accept arbitrators’ awards
10

9-11
Table 9.1 – The Major Components of Traditional U.S. Union Contract

Management rights include:
Hire and fire (with just cause)
Determine job content and workforce size
Establish production standards and rules of conduct
Decide what to produce and how and where to make it
Management obligations include:
Abide by the contract, including not making unilateral changes
Just cause discipline and discharge
Safety standards
Accept arbitrator’s awards
The grievance procedure includes 3 steps
Step 1: Employees, the union, and management meet to resolve disputes over the application and enforcement of the contract
Step 2: Typically a multistep procedure in which unresolved grievances are appealed to higher levels in the organization
Step 3: The final step is frequently binding rights arbitration
Others include:
Contracts are legally enforceable (in the United States)
Contracts are usually several years in duration
11

The 4 major components of traditional U.S. union contracts include: 
A. Employee rights
B. Management rights
C. Job Rights
D. Union rights
E. All of the above.
Question 1

Let’s try two practice questions. The 4 major components of traditional U.S. union contracts include
12

The 4 major components of traditional U.S. union contracts include: 
A. Employee rights
B. Management rights
C. Job Rights
D. Union rights
E. All of the above.
Question 1

That’s right. The answer is E. All of the above.
The 4 major components of traditional U.S. union contracts include: 
Employee rights
Management rights
Job Rights
Union rights
13

The typical collective bargaining agreement covers a(n) _________________ period.  
A. 1 year
B. 5 year
C. 3 year
D. Open-ended.
Question 2

Question 2 The typical collective bargaining agreement covers how many years?  
14

The typical collective bargaining agreement covers a(n) _________________ period.  
A. 1 year
B. 5 year
C. 3 year
D. Open-ended.
Question 2

The answer is C. 3 years. Most contracts have a duration of three years.
15

9-16
Four types of employee rights are frequently granted in union contracts:
1. Just cause discipline and discharge—specify that employees can be disciplined and discharged only for “cause” or “just cause;” employees have the right to insist that there be valid, job-related reasons for discipline or dismissal; this is of obvious importance for both employees and employers.
2. Seniority rights— length of employment with the employer is an objective union standard to prevent favoritism, manipulation, and abuse; it is widely used in union contracts as a criterion for allocating employment opportunities; more likely to be the sole factor for layoffs than for promotions or transfers.
Employee Rights and Obligations

Following are the four types of employee rights that are frequently granted in union contracts:
1. Just cause discipline and discharge—specify that employees can be disciplined and discharged only for “cause” or “just cause;” employees have the right to insist that there be valid, job-related reasons for discipline or dismissal; this is of obvious importance for both employees and employers.
2. Seniority rights— length of employment with the employer is an objective union standard to prevent favoritism, manipulation, and abuse; it is widely used in union contracts as a criterion for allocating employment opportunities; more likely to be the sole factor for layoffs than for promotions or transfers.

16

9-17
Four types of employee rights are frequently granted in union contracts:
3. Compensation—unionized workers are significantly more likely than nonunion employees to receive benefits such as health insurance, pensions, life insurance, and the like.
4. Grievance procedures—specify that employees are entitled to challenge managerial actions that they feel violate their rights under the contract; employees are granted the right to a fair hearing when there is a workplace problem.
Employee Rights and Obligations

3. Compensation—unionized workers are significantly more likely than nonunion employees to receive benefits such as health insurance, pensions, life insurance, and the like.
4. Grievance procedures—specify that employees are entitled to challenge managerial actions that they feel violate their rights under the contract; employees are granted the right to a fair hearing when there is a workplace problem.

17

9-18
Employees can be disciplined and discharged only for “cause” or “just cause”
Employees have the right to insist that there be valid, job-related reasons for discipline or dismissal
Employee Rights and Obligations

Employees can be disciplined and discharged only for “cause” or “just cause”
What does just cause mean?
Just cause discipline or dismissal there are valid, job-related reasons for discipline or dismissal
Employees have the right to insist that there be valid, job-related reasons for discipline or dismissal
18

9-19
A second category of employee rights pertains to seniority
A traditional union objective is to replace arbitrary or discriminatory treatment of workers with an objective standard to prevent favoritism, manipulation, and abuse
Widely used in union contracts as a criterion for allocating employment opportunities
Factor in promotions and transfers with more senior employees having priority over less senior ones
Employee Rights and Obligations

A second category of employee rights pertains to seniority
A traditional union objective is to replace arbitrary or discriminatory treatment of workers with an objective standard to prevent favoritism, manipulation, and abuse
Widely used in union contracts as a criterion for allocating employment opportunities
Factor in promotions and transfers with more senior employees having priority over less senior ones
19

9-20
Third category of employee rights: Compensation
Unionized workers are more likely than nonunion employees to receive benefits
Health insurance, pensions, life insurance, and the like
Numerous collective bargaining agreements contain provisions pertaining to overtime compensation, premium pay for weekends, and rest periods among others
A majority of private sector contracts give employees the right to reporting pay and call-in pay
Employee Rights and Obligations

Third category of employee rights: Compensation
Unionized workers are more likely than nonunion employees to receive benefits
Such as Health insurance, pensions, life insurance, and the like
Numerous collective bargaining agreements contain provisions pertaining to overtime compensation, premium pay for weekends, and rest periods among others
A majority of private sector contracts give employees the right to reporting pay and call-in pay
20

9-21
U.S. union contract contains a grievance procedure
Employees are entitled to challenge managerial actions that they feel violate their rights under the contract
The grievance procedure is almost always binding arbitration
Through the grievance procedure, union contract grant employees the right to a fair hearing when there is a workplace problem
Employee Rights and Obligations

U.S. union contract contains a grievance procedure
Employees are entitled to challenge managerial actions that they feel violate their rights under the contract
The grievance procedure is almost always binding arbitration
Through the grievance procedure, union contract grant employees the right to a fair hearing when there is a workplace problem
21

We have come to the end of our lecture today. If you have any questions, please feel free to email me.
See you next class!
22

Chapter 9.2

Contract Clauses and Their Administration

Copyright © 2013 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
McGraw-Hill/Irwin

Hi Class, Welcome to Industrial and Labor Relations. Today we are going to discuss Chapter 9 Contract Clauses and Their Administration Part 2
1

9-2
Union contracts convey rights and obligations to jobs
Unions representing blue-collar workers frequently negotiate wage rates that are tied to specific jobs
Job rights pertains to work assignments
Certain jobs are entitled to perform certain tasks
Unions seek such job rights because of a concern that the employer might whittle away the union-represented jobs by having supervisors expand their duties
Job Rights and Obligations

Unions representing blue-collar workers frequently negotiate wage rates that are tied to specific jobs, not individuals. In other words, holders of a specific job are entitled to a certain wage rate irrespective of their individual characteristics.
Tying wages to jobs rather than individuals is a significant component of the traditional U.S. union contract for blue-collar workers.
Another aspect of job rights pertains to work assignments—certain jobs are entitled to perform certain tasks—which unions seek because of the concern that the employer might whittle away the union-represented jobs by having supervisors expand their duties.
2

9-3
Subcontracting and outsourcing restrictions try to prevent the loss of union jobs by limiting the farming out of work to other employers
Management might try to replace higher-skilled jobs with lower-skilled, and therefore lower-paying jobs
Skilled workers face the greatest risk of having their jobs diluted and even deleted, so contractual language for job rights is frequently most explicit in guaranteeing certain tasks for skilled job classifications.
Job Rights and Obligations

Subcontracting and outsourcing restrictions try to prevent the loss of union jobs by limiting the farming out of work to other employers.
Another fear that underlies union pursuit of job rights is that management might try to replace higher-skilled jobs with lower-skilled, and therefore lower-paying, jobs; some contracts therefore include general language requiring that a job’s usual tasks be assigned to those jobs.
Skilled workers face the greatest risk of having their jobs diluted and even deleted, so contractual language for job rights is frequently most explicit in guaranteeing certain tasks for skilled job classifications.

3

9-4
Job Rights and Obligations
Auto Industry Examples

Now let’s discuss two examples of job rights and obligations.
4

9-5
Job Rights and Obligations
Auto Industry Examples
“When a Skilled Tradesman is assigned a job, he will be able to remove switches, guards, hydraulic lines, air lines, etc., in order to perform his work. He will not repair any portion of the job that is not in his classification. If any wires have to be disconnected, this will be done by electricians. In the event a piece of equipment is either dismantled for moving or a new machine is set up, the appropriate skilled Tradesman will be utilized.”

An auto manufacturing company includes the following job rights and obligations language in the union contract.
“Operators will remove their drill heads when there is a change in operation or going from one part to another as part of their normal setup… . The appropriate skilled Tradesman will be responsible for the removal of drill heads that are being removed for the sole purpose of being repaired. When repairs are completed, it will be the duties of the Tradesman to replace drill heads and make necessary alignment.”
Please note that the union contract specifies what operators can’t do. It helps to protect other workers’ jobs, such as electricians.
5

Grocery Store Example

Now let’s discuss another example.
6

9-7
Job Rights and Obligations
Grocery Store Example
“Food Handler’s work includes marking, stocking, displaying, and weighing of all preprocessed, fresh, frozen, and smoked meat, poultry, and fish, including receiving of meat products, fresh and frozen, the storage of all the above mentioned products, and the cleaning of cases. These employees shall not be allowed to work in the processing areas of the meat department including wrapping or service cases.”

The union contract of a grocery store contains the following language.
“Food Handler’s work includes marking, stocking, displaying, and weighing of all preprocessed, fresh, frozen, and smoked meat, poultry, and fish, including receiving of meat products, fresh and frozen, the storage of all the above mentioned products, and the cleaning of cases. These employees shall not be allowed to work in the processing areas of the meat department including wrapping or service cases.”
The union contract specifies what food handlers can and can’t do.
7

9-8
Third category of clauses frequently found in collective bargaining agreements gives unions rights and obligation
A recognition clause can help unions maintain their strength by including new occupations within the bargaining unit
Unions are concerned with maintaining recognition rights if a business is sold or if a public sector operation is privatized
Union Rights and Obligations

Third category of clauses frequently found in collective bargaining agreements gives unions rights and obligation
It is probably universal for one of the first sections of the contract to include a recognition clause in which the employer recognizes the union as the exclusive bargaining agent for the bargaining unit and affirms the union’s right to represent the employees.
A recognition clause can help unions maintain their strength by including new occupations within the bargaining unit. A broadly written recognition clause can help unions maintain their strength by including new occupations within the bargaining unit, such as when new positions are created when traditional media companies expand into online ventures.
Unions are concerned with maintaining recognition rights if a business is sold or if a public sector operation is privatized
8

9-9
To facilitate communication between a union and the employees unions negotiate rights for union leaders to:
Use a bulletin board on company premises
Meet employees at workplace
Union Rights and Obligations

To facilitate communication between a union and the employees unions negotiate rights for union leaders to:
Use a bulletin board on company premises
Meet employees at workplace
9

9-10
Various legal rulings indicate that a successor employer must recognize and bargain with the union.
Successor clause
To cement a continued recognition, some unions negotiate a successorship clause into their contracts which requires a successor employer to recognize and bargain with the existing union; a strong successor clause further obligates the successor employer to abide by the union contract.
Union Rights and Obligations

Under favorable conditions, various legal rulings indicate that a successor employer must recognize and bargain with the union.
To cement a continued recognition, some unions negotiate a successorship clause into their contracts which requires a successor employer to recognize and bargain with the existing union; a strong succsorship clause further obligates the successor employer to abide by the union contract.
10

9-11
Union security clauses
Types
A closed shop, requiring the employer to hire only union members
A union shop, requiring employees to become union members after hired in order to keep their jobs
An agency shop, requiring employees to pay union dues after hired in order to keep their jobs
Union Rights and Obligations

Following are the three types of union security clauses which pertain to issues of dues and mandatory membership:
A closed shop, requiring the employer to hire only union members
A union shop, requiring employees to become union members after hired in order to keep their jobs
An agency shop, requiring employees to pay union dues after hired in order to keep their jobs

11

9-12
Union security clauses
The NLRA outlaws the closed shop;
Right-to-work laws outlaw union and agency shops; however,
In the 28 states that do not have right-to-work laws, unions are allowed to negotiate union or agency shop provisions into their contracts with employers.
The Supreme Court has determined that union shop clauses are enforceable only as agency shops—workers can be forced to pay dues but not to join the union.

Union Rights and Obligations

The NLRA outlaws the closed shop;
right-to-work laws outlaw union and agency shops;
however, in the 28 states that do not have right-to-work laws, unions are allowed to negotiate union or agency shop provisions into their contracts with employers.
The Supreme Court has determined that union shop clauses are enforceable only as agency shops—workers can be forced to pay dues but not to join the union.
Union and agency shop clauses are frequently used in conjunction with a dues checkoff provision in which employees can agree to have their union dues automatically deducted from their paychecks and deposited directly with the union; this gives the union a predictable revenue stream and saves union leaders valuable dues-collecting time and energy.
Unions typically try to negotiate union shop or agency shop clauses (in non–right-to-work states) to counter the free-rider problem of bargaining unit members benefiting from the union without paying for it.

12

9-13
Union security clauses
Unions typically try to negotiate union shop or agency shop clauses (in non–right-to-work states) to counter the free-rider problem of bargaining unit members benefiting from the union without paying for it.
Right-to-work advocates label this “compulsory unionism” and argue that it violates individual freedoms by depriving workers of their “right to work”—that is, the right to freely choose whether to become union members and pay union dues.
Agency shop payments in the public sector are frequently called fair share payments, and various states have legislated processes for determining their amount.

Union Rights and Obligations

Unions typically try to negotiate union shop or agency shop clauses (in non–right-to-work states) to counter the free-rider problem of bargaining unit members benefiting from the union without paying for it.
On the other hand, right-to-work advocates label this “compulsory unionism” and argue that it violates individual freedoms by depriving workers of their “right to work”—that is, the right to freely choose whether to become union members and pay union dues.
Agency shop payments in the public sector are frequently called fair share payments, and various states have legislated processes for determining their amount.

13

9-14
Duty of fair representation
This obligation applies to both contract negotiation and administration, though it is frequently discussed in terms of administration
A union “may not arbitrarily ignore a meritorious grievance or process it in a perfunctory fashion” in a discriminatory or bad faith manner
This obligation is universal and does not depend on the presence of specific clauses in a union contract
Union Rights and Obligations

In return for the various rights that a union might be granted by contract clauses, it is obligated to live up to the terms of the complete contract; particularly, unions usually give up the right to strike over grievances and instead must pursue orderly resolution of disputes over the application of the contract through the grievance procedure.
Another union obligation, and a central issue in contract administration for labor unions, is the duty of fair representation—under the NLRA, a union that wins an NLRB election becomes the exclusive bargaining agent for that bargaining unit; the Supreme Court ruled that in return for this privilege of being the exclusive representative, unions have the obligation to fairly and without discrimination represent all bargaining unit employees; this obligation applies to both contract negotiation and administration, though it is frequently discussed in terms of administration.
A union “may not arbitrarily ignore a meritorious grievance or process it in a perfunctory fashion” in a discriminatory or bad faith manner.
Because the duty of fair representation is rooted in Supreme Court applications of labor law, this obligation is universal and does not depend on the presence of specific clauses in a union contract
14

9-15
Management rights clauses – Embody management’s insistence on maintaining sole authority over traditional management functions
such as hiring, firing, assigning work, determining job content, and deciding what to produce and how and where to make it
Such clauses are found in 80 percent of private sector contracts
Management Rights and Obligations

Union contracts also provide rights to management through management rights clauses which embody management’s longstanding insistence on maintaining sole authority over traditional management functions
such as hiring, firing, assigning work, determining job content, and deciding what to produce and how and where to make it.
Such clauses are found in 80 percent of private sector contracts
15

9-16
In the public sector, management rights clauses are also frequently found in union contracts
Management rights clauses are now deeply ingrained in U.S. labor relations and are even found in collective bargaining agreements
The reserved rights doctrine of management rights, also called the residual rights doctrine, specifies that all management rights not explicitly limited, restricted, or modified by the union contract are reserved by management;
Management Rights and Obligations

In the public sector, management rights clauses are also frequently found in union contracts, and they are even specified by law in the federal sector by the Civil Service Reform Act and in the state and local sectors by some state bargaining laws.
Management rights clauses are now deeply ingrained in U.S. labor relations and are even found in collective bargaining agreements in which the employer is a union and the workers are regular employees of that union; in such situations the employees are represented by a different union, such as the Office and Professional Employees International Union.
The reserved rights doctrine of management rights, also called the residual rights doctrine, specifies that all management rights not explicitly limited, restricted, or modified by the union contract are reserved by management; the detailed work rules often found in traditional union contracts are a natural reaction by organized labor to this doctrine.
 
16

9-17
Management’s obligations under union contracts,
disciplining and discharging workers only for just cause,
using seniority as a factor in layoffs and promotions,
assigning work to specific job classes,
providing call-in pay,
allowing shop stewards to investigate grievances, and the like
Employers are obligated to resolve grievances peacefully through the grievance procedure and to abide by the terms specified not only by the contract, but also by arbitration awards.
Management Rights and Obligations

If management retains authority over all issues that are not limited, restricted, or modified, then unions will seek to explicitly limit, restrict, and modify managerial authority where it serves workers’ interests.
These limitations, restrictions, and modifications largely represent management’s obligations under union contracts, such as disciplining and discharging workers only for just cause, using seniority as a factor in layoffs and promotions, assigning work to specific job classes, providing call-in pay, allowing shop stewards to investigate grievances, and the like.
Employers are obligated to resolve grievances peacefully through the grievance procedure and to abide by the terms specified not only by the contract, but also by arbitration awards.
17

The Grievance Procedure

Please click on the video and watch an introduction to Grievance Procedure
18

9-19
Grievance procedure – The method for resolving rights disputes and grievances over the interpretation, application, and enforcement of union contracts in U.S. labor relations that is negotiated into a contract
Every union contract in the United States contains grievance procedure to resolve allegations by employees or the union
Grievance Procedures

Grievance procedure – The method for resolving rights disputes and grievances over the interpretation, application, and enforcement of union contracts in U.S. labor relations that is negotiated into a contract
Every union contract in the United States contains grievance procedure to resolve allegations by employees or the union
19

9-20
Nonunion grievance procedures such as open-door policies, peer review panels, or ombudspersons lack due process protections
Formal grievance disputes may be inevitable in unionized workplaces, but the rate at which they emerge is not
Grievance procedure provides employees with due process and gives unions an avenue for pressuring management to further their bargaining goals
Grievance Procedures

Nonunion grievance procedures such as open-door policies, peer review panels, or ombudspersons lack due process protections
Formal grievance disputes may be inevitable in unionized workplaces, but the rate at which they emerge is not
Grievance procedure provides employees with due process and gives unions an avenue for pressuring management to further their bargaining goals
20

9-21
Rights arbitration – Ensures that the grievance process is fair and respects workers’ rights
This is also called grievance arbitration
Involves a hearing before a third-party neutral (the arbitrator), who issues a decision that is binding on the parties
Focuses on rights disputes
Nearly all contracts in both the private and public sectors include binding rights arbitration as the last step of the grievance procedure
Grievance Arbitration

Rights arbitration – Ensures that the grievance process is fair and respects workers’ rights
This is also called grievance arbitration
Involves a hearing before a third-party neutral (the arbitrator), who issues a decision that is binding on the parties
Focuses on rights disputes
Nearly all contracts in both the private and public sectors include binding rights arbitration as the last step of the grievance procedure
21

9-22
Interpreting ambiguous contract language
The arbitrator’s task is to interpret the contract and apply it to the situation at hand
Disputes for which the contract is clear are likely to be settled early in the grievance procedure, so arbitrators frequently confront difficult and ambiguous matters of interpretation
Grievance Arbitration

Interpreting ambiguous contract language
The arbitrator’s task is to interpret the contract and apply it to the situation at hand
Disputes for which the contract is clear are likely to be settled early in the grievance procedure, so arbitrators frequently confront difficult and ambiguous matters of interpretation
22

9-23
Arbitrators’ decisions are based on the common law of the workplace
The written rules and unwritten customs developed in each workplace by the union contract
Grievance Arbitration

Arbitrators’ decisions are based on the common law of the workplace
The written rules and unwritten customs developed in each workplace by the union contract
23

Employees, the union, and management meet to resolve disputes over the application and enforcement of the contract.
Typically a multistep procedure in which unresolved grievances are appealed to higher levels in the organization.
The final step is frequently binding rights arbitration.
Grievance Procedure

The Grievance Procedure includes three important steps
Employees, the union, and management meet to resolve disputes over the application and enforcement of the contract.
Typically a multistep procedure in which unresolved grievances are appealed to higher levels in the organization.
The final step is frequently binding rights arbitration.
24

9-25
Criticisms of grievance arbitration
The bureaucratic nature of traditional grievance procedures and the importance of stewards, union officials, and attorneys rather than individual workers are attacked by labor activists for stifling rank–and-file involvement in unions
It can be lengthy and costly
It is excessively legal, formal, and reactive
Grievance Arbitration

Criticisms of grievance arbitration
The bureaucratic nature of traditional grievance procedures and the importance of stewards, union officials, and attorneys rather than individual workers are attacked by labor activists for stifling rank–and-file involvement in unions
It can be lengthy and costly
It is excessively legal, formal, and reactive
25

9-26
Most important areas of contract administration is employee discipline and discharge
Employers particularly want to be able to discipline and terminate employees who are substandard performers, and employees do not want to lose their jobs unfairly
Just cause discipline or discharge- There must be valid, job-related reasons for being disciplined or fired
Employee Discipline

Most important areas of contract administration is employee discipline and discharge
Employers particularly want to be able to discipline and terminate employees who are substandard performers, and employees do not want to lose their jobs unfairly
Just cause – There must be valid, job-related reasons for being disciplined or fired
26

Grievance Discussion
As an arbitrator, how would you rule? Why?

Please work on the five arbitration cases in your lecture notes pack. For each case, please discuss as an arbitrator, how would you rule? Why?
We’ll discuss the answers in class.
27

We have come to the end of our lecture today. If you have any questions, please feel free to email me.
See you next class!
28

Chapter 8
Part 2

Dispute Resolution

Copyright © 2013 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
McGraw-Hill/Irwin

Hi Class, Welcome to Industrial and Labor Relations. Today we are going to discuss Chapter 8 Part 1 Dispute Resolution
1

8-2
Use of a neutral third party to settle bargaining impasses with the goal of avoiding costly strikes
In private sector third party dispute resolution mechanism is voluntary, but in public sector is it compulsory
Three primary third-party dispute resolution mechanisms are:
Mediation
Arbitration
Fact-finding
Third-party Dispute Resolution

Third-party dispute resolution mechanisms use a neutral third party to settle bargaining impasses with the goal of avoiding costly strikes.
In the private sector, a strong sense of property rights and the freedom to enter economic contracts of one’s own choosing means that the use of third-party dispute resolution mechanisms is usually voluntary—they are rarely forced on labor and management.
In the public sector, however, the primacy of serving the public interest means that third-party dispute resolution mechanisms are often compulsory—labor and management must use them before or instead of striking.
Three primary third-party dispute resolution mechanisms are:
Mediation
Arbitration
Fact-finding
2

8-3
Table 8.4 – Options for third Party Dispute Resolution

Table 8.4 presents the four options for third Party Dispute Resolution
In Mediations—the neutral third party is a mediator who tries to facilitate an agreement but lacks the power to force an agreement; a mediator has a high level of control over the negotiating process but not the outcome; a mediator can be either an independent practitioner or full-time employee of mediation agencies at the federal level (the Federal Mediation and Conciliation Service and the National Mediation Board) or the state level.
In Arbitrations—the neutral third party is an arbitrator who forces an agreement on both parties by issuing a ruling that specifies the settlement terms; an arbitrator has a high level of control over the outcome but no involvement in the negotiating process; arbitrators usually either are full-time, self-employed arbitrators or are lawyers or university professors (typically in law or industrial relations) who arbitrate on a part-time basis.
In Fact-findings—the neutral third party is a fact finder who investigates the dispute and makes nonbinding recommendations for a settlement; fact finder lacks control over both the process and the outcome. Fact-finding has the worst of both worlds—low control over both the outcome and the negotiating process—because of which it is often evaluated negatively.
Hybrid mechanisms can also be created, such as “med–arb,” in which the mediator becomes the arbitrator if mediation fails.
3

8-4
A dispute resolution process
A neutral third party, the mediator helps negotiators avoid or resolve an impasse by reaching an agreement
Mediation is essentially “assisted negotiation”
In practice mediation involves a series of meetings with the mediator some joint meetings and some individual meetings with union and management negotiators
Mediation

Mediation is a dispute resolution process in which a neutral third party—the mediator—helps negotiators avoid or resolve an impasse by reaching an agreement.
Unlike striking or going to arbitration, the use of mediation does not need to wait until an impasse occurs.
By definition mediators lack the authority to force a resolution by imposing a settlement on the negotiators; rather, mediation is essentially “assisted negotiation.”
In practice mediation involves a series of meetings with the mediator—some joint meetings with the union and management negotiating teams together, and some individual meetings with only the union or management negotiators.
4

8-5
The mediation process evolves through several stages
Setting the stage in which the mediator collects information and establishes ground rules
Problem solving wherein the mediator works on clarifying the disputed issues and on developing alternative solutions
The focus of the mediator is achieving a workable agreement
Mediation

Through these meetings the mediation process typically evolves through the following stages:
1. Setting the stage—the mediator collects information and establishes ground rules; one of the most important keys to success for mediators needs to be achieved during this stage: establishing a report so that the parties trust the mediator.
2. Problem solving—the mediator works on clarifying the disputed issues and on developing alternative solutions.
3. Achieving a workable agreement—the focus is on encouraging the negotiators to reach a settlement.
5

8-6
Depending on the types of tactics emphasized, individual mediators can be classified as follows:
1. Orchestrators.
They focus on trying to facilitate productive negotiations; this is the traditional view of mediation that targets improved dialogue between negotiators.
They think that if they can improve the climate and structure of negotiations, the parties will be able to resolve their differences on the issues.
Mediation

Depending on the types of tactics emphasized, individual mediators can be classified as follows:
1. Orchestrators.
They focus on trying to facilitate productive negotiations; this is the traditional view of mediation that targets improved dialogue between negotiators.
They think that if they can improve the climate and structure of negotiations, the parties will be able to resolve their differences on the issues.
6

8-7
2. Dealmakers
They see negotiations as over when they enter and are therefore not very concerned with facilitating renewed negotiations.
They focus their attention on the bargaining issues and trying to pressure the negotiators to make concessions.
They are more direct in their attempts to shape the final outcome—not the process—by getting the negotiators to change their positions and strike a deal.
They are more likely to produce agreements, but they are also more likely to be perceived as antagonistic or biased, which can reduce negotiators’ acceptance of mediators.
Mediation

2. Dealmakers
They see negotiations as over when they enter and are therefore not very concerned with facilitating renewed negotiations.
They focus their attention on the bargaining issues and trying to pressure the negotiators to make concessions.
They are more direct in their attempts to shape the final outcome—not the process—by getting the negotiators to change their positions and strike a deal.
They are more likely to produce agreements, but they are also more likely to be perceived as antagonistic or biased, which can reduce negotiators’ acceptance of mediators.
7

8-8
Depending on the sector, mediation can be voluntary or mandatory
Under the NLRA mediation is voluntary.
Employers and unions are required to notify the Federal Mediation and Conciliation Service (FMCS) that they will be renegotiating a contract; this advance notice lets the FMCS offer the assistance of a mediator, but either party can refuse this offer.
Mediation

Depending on the sector, mediation can be voluntary or mandatory
Under the NLRA mediation is voluntary.
Employers and unions are required to notify the Federal Mediation and Conciliation Service (FMCS) that they will be renegotiating a contract; this advance notice lets the FMCS offer the assistance of a mediator, but either party can refuse this offer.
8

8-9
Railroads and airlines are prohibited from changing the existing terms and conditions of employment, and unions are forbidden from striking, until the National Mediation Board releases the parties from mediation.
In difficult disputes the parties may be kept in mediation longer than they would like; but the objective of the mediator, and of the Railway Labor Act, is to resolve disputes without strikes and other forms of conflict.
The National Mediation Board is also obligated to offer arbitration to the parties as a method for resolving their dispute, but either party can reject this offer.

Mediation

The Railway Labor Act, however, makes mediation mandatory for negotiators in the railway and airline industries; railroads and airlines are prohibited from changing the existing terms and conditions of employment, and unions are forbidden from striking, until the National Mediation Board releases the parties from mediation.
In difficult disputes the parties may be kept in mediation longer than they would like; but the objective of the mediator, and of the Railway Labor Act, is to resolve disputes without strikes and other forms of conflict.
The National Mediation Board is also obligated to offer arbitration to the parties as a method for resolving their dispute, but either party can reject this offer; if the parties are released from mediation and one party rejects arbitration, a strike can legally occur after a 30-day cooling-off period.
9

8-10
A diverse pattern of voluntary and mandatory mediation is also present in public sector labor law across different states.
Public sector mediation is typically the first step in a multistep dispute resolution process. In states that allow public sector workers to strike, mediation is commonly required before strikes can legally occur.
Mediation is also frequently used before arbitration or fact-finding; in only a handful of states the final dispute resolution step is mediation.

Mediation

A diverse pattern of voluntary and mandatory mediation is also present in public sector labor law across different states.
Public sector mediation is typically the first step in a multistep dispute resolution process. In states that allow public sector workers to strike, mediation is commonly required before strikes can legally occur (similar to the Railway Labor Act).
Mediation is also frequently used before arbitration or fact-finding; in only a handful of states the final dispute resolution step is mediation.
10

8-11
Arbitration resolves disputes by a neutral third-party arbitrator (or panel of arbitrators)
It involves the issuing of a settlement that is binding on the employer, union, and employees
A hearing is held, evidence is presented by each side, and an arbitrator issues a decision
Interest Arbitration

Arbitration resolves disputes by a neutral third-party arbitrator (or panel of arbitrators)
It involves the issuing of a settlement that is binding on the employer, union, and employees
A hearing is held, evidence is presented by each side, and an arbitrator issues a decision
11

8-12
Interest arbitration: To resolve interest disputes that results in new contractual terms governing wages and terms and conditions of employment
Imposes a settlement on the parties to the dispute
Once invoked arbitration has a 100 percent settlement rate
The typical standard for arbitration, therefore, is the extent to which the threat of arbitration encourages negotiated rather than arbitrated settlements.

Interest Arbitration

Interest arbitration is an arbitration to resolve interest disputes that result in new contractual terms governing wages and terms and conditions of employment; grievance arbitration to settle rights disputes is also important in U.S. labor relations.
Unlike mediation and fact-finding, interest arbitration imposes a settlement on the parties to the dispute and so, once invoked arbitration has a 100 percent settlement rate; a common objective in labor relations is to have parties peacefully settle their own differences.
The typical standard for arbitration, therefore, is the extent to which the threat of arbitration encourages negotiated rather than arbitrated settlements.
12

8-13
The two primary forms of interest arbitration are:
Conventional arbitration
The arbitrator is not constrained in deciding the settlement terms
Final offer arbitration
Created such that the arbitrator must choose between the union’s final offer and the employer’s final offer
Interest Arbitration

The two primary forms of interest arbitration are:
In Conventional arbitrations, the arbitrator is not constrained in deciding the settlement terms.
The employer likely argues for a certain wage increase, the union tries to justify a higher wage increase, and the arbitrator can choose any wage increase seen as warranted.
Final offer arbitration was Created such that the arbitrator must choose between the union’s final offer and the employer’s final offer
13

8-14
Chilling effect of arbitration
The uncertainty of the arbitrator’s choice and the loss of control by the negotiators over the settlement terms motivate negotiators to reach their own negotiated agreement without resorting to arbitration.
If arbitrators simply split the difference between the positions of labor and management, each side might hold back from making compromises during negotiations.

Interest Arbitration

What is Chilling effect?
The uncertainty of what the arbitrator will choose and the loss of control by the negotiators over the settlement terms motivate negotiators to reach their own negotiated agreement without resorting to arbitration.
It has traditionally been believed that such a system suffers from the chilling effect; if arbitrators simply split the difference between the positions of labor and management, each side might hold back from making compromises during negotiations; it is a significant concern in labor relations because many believe that arbitration should encourage negotiated settlements.
14

8-15
Final offer arbitration – Created such that the arbitrator must choose between the union’s final offer and the employer’s final offer
It was created to try to lessen the potential chilling effect of conventional arbitration.
The arbitrator must choose between the union’s final offer and the employer’s final offer.
Lessens potential chilling effect
The underlying logic is that because the arbitrator cannot choose a compromise value, it is riskier for a negotiator to present an extreme offer because this will increase the chances that the arbitrator chooses the other side’s final offer.

Interest Arbitration

Final offer arbitration – was Created such that the arbitrator must choose between the union’s final offer and the employer’s final offer
It was created to try to lessen the potential chilling effect of conventional arbitration.
The arbitrator must choose between the union’s final offer and the employer’s final offer.
Final offer arbitration Lessens potential chilling effect
The underlying logic is that because the arbitrator cannot choose a compromise value, it is riskier for a negotiator to present an extreme offer because this will increase the chances that the arbitrator chooses the other side’s final offer.
If both sides present extreme offers, final offer arbitration is not necessarily any riskier than conventional arbitration, so both types of arbitration might induce a chilling effect.
15

Final offer arbitration has two variations
(a) total package final offer arbitration, in which the arbitrator must select one party’s final offer on all the disputed contract terms; and
(b) issue-by-issue final offer arbitration, in which the arbitrator can choose either party’s final offer on an issue-by-issue basis.
Interest Arbitration

Final offer arbitration has two variations—
total package final offer arbitration, in which the arbitrator must select one party’s final offer on all the disputed contract terms; and
(b) issue-by-issue final offer arbitration, in which the arbitrator can choose either party’s final offer on an issue-by-issue basis.
The underlying logic is that because the arbitrator cannot choose a compromise value, it is riskier for a negotiator to present an extreme offer because this will increase the chances that the arbitrator chooses the other side’s final offer.
16

8-17
Narcotic effect of arbitration: Negotiators might become addicted to or over dependent on arbitration
Interest arbitration is voluntary in the private sector and mandatory in the public sector
Interest Arbitration

Arbitration might also have a narcotic effect—that is, negotiators might become addicted to or overdependent on arbitration; this posits that when negotiators see how they can “pass the buck” to the arbitrator, they will develop an overdependence on arbitration to settle their negotiations.
17

Interest arbitration is voluntary in the private sector and often mandatory in the public sector
Most interest arbitration occurs in the public sector.
Interest Arbitration

As with mediation, interest arbitration is voluntary in the private sector and often mandatory in the public sector; the most visible use of private sector interest arbitration is the final offer arbitration system used in major league
Most interest arbitration occurs in the public sector.
18

8-19
A mediator has a high level of control over the negotiating process but not the outcome
Mediators can be either independent practitioners or full-time employees of mediation agencies at the federal level or the state level
An arbitrator has a high level of control over the outcome and not the negotiating process
Arbitrators either are full-time, self-employed arbitrators or are lawyers or university professors who arbitrate on a part-time basis
Interest Arbitration

A mediator has a high level of control over the negotiating process but not the outcome
Mediators can be either independent practitioners or full-time employees of mediation agencies at the federal level or the state level
An arbitrator has a high level of control over the outcome and not the negotiating process
Arbitrators either are full-time, self-employed arbitrators or are lawyers or university professors who arbitrate on a part-time basis
19

Hybrid mechanisms can also be created, med-arb, in which the mediator becomes the arbitrator if mediation fails.
Although many states that use arbitration also use mediation as a first step, med–arb is a special case in which the same neutral individual serves as both the mediator and the arbitrator.
Med–arb

+
=

Some states (Wisconsin, for example) use a hybrid mediation–arbitration procedure, often called “med-arb.”; although many states that use arbitration also use mediation as a first step, med–arb is a special case in which the same neutral individual serves as both the mediator and the arbitrator.
Although many states that use arbitration also use mediation as a first step, med–arb is a special case in which the same neutral individual serves as both the mediator and the arbitrator.
20

The main advantage of med–arb over other third-party dispute resolution mechanisms is that the mediator–arbitrator develops detailed knowledge of the situation during the mediation phase that can result in a better arbitration award if arbitration becomes necessary.
The threat of arbitration might also give the mediator–arbitrator more leverage during the mediation phase.
On the other hand, negotiators may not be completely forthcoming during the mediation phase for fear that the revealed information could be used against them during the arbitration phase.
Med–Arb

The main advantage of med–arb over other third-party dispute resolution mechanisms is that the mediator–arbitrator develops detailed knowledge of the situation during the mediation phase that can result in a better arbitration award if arbitration becomes necessary.
The threat of arbitration might also give the mediator–arbitrator more leverage during the mediation phase—in other words, med–arb can be thought of as “mediation with a club.”
On the other hand, negotiators may not be completely forthcoming during the mediation phase for fear that the revealed information could be used against them during the arbitration phase.
Few individuals are effective at both mediation and arbitration because different skills are needed for each.
21

8-22
Third-party dispute resolution method
A neutral third party called the fact finder investigates a bargaining impasse and issues a nonbinding recommendations for settlement
It does not guarantee a resolution
It does not assist the negotiators
Fact-Finding

Fact-finding is a third-party dispute resolution method in which a neutral third party—a fact finder—investigates a bargaining impasse and issues nonbinding recommendations for a settlement; it is essentially nonbinding arbitration.
Unlike arbitration, fact-finding does not guarantee a resolution, and
Unlike mediation, it does not assist the negotiators.
Typically hearings allow each side to make its case, and then the fact finder issues a report containing specific terms of a settlement; but unlike in arbitration, these terms are not binding on the parties
22

8-23
Even without a binding award, the fact-finding report helps resolve dispute in three ways:
By establishing a set of unbiased settlement terms, the fact-finding report can help the negotiators reevaluate their positions find an acceptable compromise settlement
A fact-finding report can let union or management negotiators save face by making concessions under the guide of the report rather than appearing weak
Making the fact-finding report public can use the glare of publicity to push the parties to a settlement
Fact-Finding

Even without a binding award, the fact-finding report helps resolve dispute in three ways:
1. By establishing a set of unbiased settlement terms, the fact-finding report can help the negotiators reevaluate their positions and find an acceptable compromise settlement.
2. As with the narcotic effect in arbitration, a fact-finding report can let union or management negotiators save face by making concessions under the guide of following the report rather than appearing weak.
3. Making the fact-finding report public can use the glare of publicity to push the parties to a settlement—typically along the lines of the fact finder’s recommendations because they are publicly viewed as neutral and fair.
23

8-24
The public pressure that underlies the rationale of fact-finding frequently does not exist.
The fact-finding report is useful as a basis for the substance of this action, but enacting legislation is an inefficient way to end bargaining disputes.
The emergency strike procedures in both the Railway Labor Act and the NLRA are essentially fact-finding procedures.
In the public sector, fact-finding is specified as the final dispute resolution step in many state bargaining laws.

Fact-Finding

The public pressure that underlies the rationale of fact-finding frequently does not exist.
As a last resort, a legislative body might need to intervene and legislate an end to the dispute. The fact-finding report is useful as a basis for the substance of this action, but enacting legislation is an inefficient way to end bargaining disputes.
The emergency strike procedures in both the Railway Labor Act and the NLRA are essentially fact-finding procedures.
In the public sector, fact-finding is specified as the final dispute resolution step in many state bargaining laws. The widespread incorporation of fact-finding in state laws is perhaps a political compromise between unions’ demands for binding arbitration and public sector employers’ demands for only mediation as the final step for resolving interest disputes; but it is reasonable to question whether this compromise effectively serves the labor relations process.
In fact, fact-finding appears to actually increase labor conflict relative to public sector jurisdictions that settle disputes with strikes or arbitration.
24

8-25
No method is best along all dimensions; each of the alternatives involves trade-offs
Strikes and lockouts can be particularly inefficient and costly to employers, employees, and the public
Private sector unions and employers are almost always adamantly opposed to giving up the right to strike or to lock out employees.
Employers insist on retaining control over the terms of the settlement (rather than handing control over to an arbitrator), while unions insist that striking is a fundamental right that underlies the ability of employees to achieve equity and voice.
What’s Best?

From a practical standpoint, preparing for any type of bargaining impasse, but especially a strike through the creation of a strike contingency plan, is complex and contains significant challenges for labor relations professionals on both the management and union sides.
From a policy perspective, there are a number of ways to resolve bargaining impasses—allowing the parties to use their economic weapons, providing mediation, requiring binding arbitration, publicizing a fact finder’s recommendations, and various hybrid combinations of these alternatives
No method is best along all dimensions; rather, each of the alternatives involves trade-offs. Like other aspects of labor relations, dispute resolution systems need to strike a balance between these trade-offs.
Strikes and lockouts can be particularly inefficient and costly to employers, employees, and the public.
However, private sector unions and employers are almost always adamantly opposed to giving up the right to strike or to lock out employees.
Employers insist on retaining control over the terms of the settlement (rather than handing control over to an arbitrator), while unions insist that striking is a fundamental right that underlies the ability of employees to achieve equity and voice. Whether the use of strike replacements destroys this right is an important question for the future of U.S. labor relations and again is a question of balancing the rights and interests of employers and employees.

25

8-26
If the primary goal of the dispute resolution system is putting pressure on negotiators to settle and guaranteeing a settlement, arbitration is best.
However, if the goal of the dispute resolution system is assisting negotiators in resolving their own disputes —mediation is best.
Fact-finding lacks significant control over both the negotiating process and the outcome
In practice, many labor relations systems combine various dispute resolution methods
What’s Best?

If the primary goal of the dispute resolution system is putting pressure on negotiators to settle and guaranteeing a settlement, arbitration is best.
However, if the goal of the dispute resolution system is assisting negotiators in resolving their own disputes—and thereby fostering healthy collective bargaining relationships—mediation is best.
Fact-finding lacks significant control over both the negotiating process and the outcome

In practice, many labor relations systems combine various dispute resolution methods—especially (usually voluntary) mediation with economic weapons in the private sector and (sometimes mandatory) mediation with fact-finding in the public sector.

26

Dispute Resolution Quiz
Lecture Notes

Please take out your lecture notes for chapter 8 and work on the Dispute Resolution Quiz
27

Third-party dispute resolution mechanisms use ____________________ to settle bargaining impasses with the goal of avoiding costly strikes. 
A. a neutral third-party
B. decertification elections
C. boycotts
D. a local county judge
Question 1

Third-party dispute resolution mechanisms use which of the following to settle bargaining impasses with the goal of avoiding costly strikes. 
A. a neutral third-party
B. decertification elections
C. boycotts
D. a local county judge
28

Third-party dispute resolution mechanisms use ____________________ to settle bargaining impasses with the goal of avoiding costly strikes. 
A. a neutral third-party
B. decertification elections
C. boycotts
D. a local county judge
Question 1

That’s right. The answer is A. a neutral third-party
29

Which of the following is not a typical stage of mediation? 
A. Setting ground rules and building trust between parties
B. Clarifying disputed issues and developing some alternative solutions
C. Determining whether any unfair labor practices were committed during negotiations
D. Working with negotiators to identify a mutually acceptable agreement
Question 2

Which of the following is not a typical stage of mediation? 
30

Which of the following is not a typical stage of mediation? 
A. Setting ground rules and building trust between parties
B. Clarifying disputed issues and developing some alternative solutions
C. Determining whether any unfair labor practices were committed during negotiations
D. Working with negotiators to identify a mutually acceptable agreement
Question 2

C. Determining whether any unfair labor practices were committed during negotiations.
Through these meetings the mediation process typically evolves through the following stages:
1. Setting the stage—the mediator collects information and establishes ground rules; one of the most important keys to success for mediators needs to be achieved during this stage: establishing a report so that the parties trust the mediator.
2. Problem solving—the mediator works on clarifying the disputed issues and on developing alternative solutions.
3. Achieving a workable agreement—the focus is on encouraging the negotiators to reach a settlement.
31

A dispute resolution process in which a neutral third party examines the final offers of each party and then chooses the one that seems, overall, to be the most reasonable and responsible settlement.
A. Conventional arbitration 
B. Whole package arbitration 
C. Mediation 
D. Fact-finding 
E. Issue-by-issue final offer arbitration

Question 3

Which of the following is a dispute resolution process in which a neutral third party examines the final offers of each party and then chooses the one that seems, overall, to be the most reasonable and responsible settlement?
32

A dispute resolution process in which a neutral third party examines the final offers of each party and then chooses the one that seems, overall, to be the most reasonable and responsible settlement.
A. Conventional arbitration 
B. Whole package arbitration 
C. Mediation 
D. Fact-finding 
E. Issue-by-issue final offer arbitration

Question 3

The answer is B. Whole package arbitration, or total package arbitration. Also known as whole package or total package final offer aribritation.
33

In _______________________ arbitration, the arbitrator is not constrained to choose either the management or union’s offer(s); rather she can make up whatever final contract terms she deems appropriate and fair. 
A. Conventional
B. Issue-by-issue final offer
C. Whole package final offer
D. Mediation
Question 4

In which kind of arbitration arbitration, the arbitrator is not constrained to choose either the management or union’s offer(s); rather she can make up whatever final contract terms she deems appropriate and fair. 
34

In _______________________ arbitration, the arbitrator is not constrained to choose either the management or union’s offer(s); rather she can make up whatever final contract terms she deems appropriate and fair. 
A. Conventional
B. Issue-by-issue final offer
C. Whole package final offer
D. Mediation
Question 4

That’s right. The answer is A. Conventional. In Conventional arbitrations, the arbitrator is not constrained in deciding the settlement terms.
35

The tendency for management and labor to rely on an arbitrator to make decisions for them, rather than come to an agreement themselves, is known as: 
A. The chilling effect.
B. The narcotic effect.
C. The dependency effect.
D. The arbitrator authority effect.
Question 5

The tendency for management and labor to rely on an arbitrator to make decisions for them, rather than come to an agreement themselves, is known as what effect? 
36

The tendency for management and labor to rely on an arbitrator to make decisions for them, rather than come to an agreement themselves, is known as: 
A. The chilling effect.
B. The narcotic effect.
C. The dependency effect.
D. The arbitrator authority effect.
Question 5

The answer is B. The narcotic effect. Narcotic effect of arbitration occurs when negotiators might become addicted to or over dependent on arbitration
37

A dispute resolution process in which a neutral third party assists the parties in reaching a mutually-acceptable resolution.
A. Conventional arbitration 
B. Whole package arbitration 
C. Mediation 
D. Fact-finding 
E. Issue-by-issue, final offer arbitration 

Question 6

Which of the following is a dispute resolution process in which a neutral third party assists the parties in reaching a mutually-acceptable resolution?
38

A dispute resolution process in which a neutral third party assists the parties in reaching a mutually-acceptable resolution.
A. Conventional arbitration 
B. Whole package arbitration 
C. Mediation 
D. Fact-finding 
E. Issue-by-issue, final offer arbitration 

Question 6

The answer is Mediation. A mediator has a high level of control over the negotiating process but not the outcome.
39

A dispute resolution process in which a neutral third party examines the final offers of each party and then designs a contract by choosing either the union or management’s offer on each issue.
A. Conventional arbitration 
B. Whole package arbitration 
C. Mediation 
D. Fact-finding 
E. Issue-by-issue final offer arbitration

Question 7

Which of the following is a dispute resolution process in which a neutral third party examines the final offers of each party and then designs a contract by choosing either the union or management’s offer on each issue?
40

A dispute resolution process in which a neutral third party examines the final offers of each party and then designs a contract by choosing either the union or management’s offer on each issue.
A. Conventional arbitration 
B. Whole package arbitration 
C. Mediation 
D. Fact-finding 
E. Issue-by-issue final offer arbitration

Question 7

That’s right. The answer is E. Issue-by-issue final offer arbitration. The arbitrator can choose either party’s final offer on an issue-by-issue basis.

41

A dispute resolution process in which a neutral third party examines the final offers of each party and then creates a new contract which may or may not reflect the parties’ positions on each issue.
A. Conventional arbitration 
B. Whole package arbitration 
C. Mediation 
D. Fact-finding 
E. Issue-by-issue final offer arbitration

Question 8

Which of the following is a dispute resolution process in which a neutral third party examines the final offers of each party and then creates a new contract which may or may not reflect the parties’ positions on each issue?
42

A dispute resolution process in which a neutral third party examines the final offers of each party and then creates a new contract which may or may not reflect the parties’ positions on each issue.
A. Conventional arbitration 
B. Whole package arbitration 
C. Mediation 
D. Fact-finding 
E. Issue-by-issue final offer arbitration

Question 8

That’s right. The answer is A. Conventional. In Conventional arbitrations, the arbitrator is not constrained in deciding the settlement terms.
43

A dispute resolution process in which a neutral third party investigates the claims and positions of each party and provides a public assessment of the situation.
A. Conventional arbitration 
B. Whole package arbitration 
C. Mediation 
D. Fact-finding 
E. Issue-by-issue final offer arbitration

Question 9

Which of the following is a dispute resolution process in which a neutral third party investigates the claims and positions of each party and provides a public assessment of the situation?
44

A dispute resolution process in which a neutral third party investigates the claims and positions of each party and provides a public assessment of the situation.
A. Conventional arbitration 
B. Whole package arbitration 
C. Mediation 
D. Fact-finding 
E. Issue-by-issue final offer arbitration

Question 9

The answer is D. Fact-finding. Fact-finding is a third-party dispute resolution method in which a neutral third party—a fact finder—investigates a bargaining impasse and issues nonbinding recommendations for a settlement; it is essentially nonbinding arbitration.
Unlike arbitration, fact-finding does not guarantee a resolution, and
Unlike mediation, it does not assist the negotiators.

45

The tendency of labor and management to take extreme positions in their final offers in the hopes that an arbitrator will “split the difference” between offers is known as the:
A. The chilling effect.
B. The narcotic effect.
C. The dependency effect.
D. The arbitrator authority effect.

Question 10

The tendency of labor and management to take extreme positions in their final offers in the hopes that an arbitrator will “split the difference” between offers is known as what effect?
46

The tendency of labor and management to take extreme positions in their final offers in the hopes that an arbitrator will “split the difference” between offers is known as the:
A. The chilling effect.
B. The narcotic effect.
C. The dependency effect.
D. The arbitrator authority effect.

Question 10

The answer is A. The chilling effect which occurs when the uncertainty of what the arbitrator will choose and the loss of control by the negotiators over the settlement terms motivate negotiators to reach their own negotiated agreement without resorting to arbitration.

47

Dispute Resolution Quiz
Answer:

Q1 A
Q2 C
Q3 B
Q4 A
Q5 B

Q6 C
Q7 E
Q8 A
Q9 D
Q10 A

Here is answer for the dispute resolution quiz. Please check and make sure you know the answers for all quiz questions.
48

We have come to the end of our lecture today. If you have any questions, please feel free to email me.
See you next class!
49

Chapter 8
Part 1

Impasse and Strikes

Copyright © 2013 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
McGraw-Hill/Irwin

Hi Class, Welcome to Industrial and Labor Relations. Today we are going to discuss Chapter 8 Part 1 Impasse and strikes
The primary goal of the bargaining process is for labor and management negotiators to reach an agreement on the terms and conditions of employment, usually in the form of a written contract. Sometimes, however, negotiations are unsuccessful and impasses are reached. This chapter outlines what happens when impasses occur, and the alternative methods for their resolution.
1

1. Explore options for resolving bargaining disputes and impasses.
2. Understand different types of strikes and lockouts, their roles in labor relations, and their legal restrictions in the private and public sectors.
3. Discuss the controversies surrounding the use of strike replacements.
Learning Objectives

The Learning objectives are
1. Explore options for resolving bargaining disputes and impasses.
2. Understand different types of strikes and lockouts, their roles in labor relations, and their legal restrictions in the private and public sectors.
3. Discuss the controversies surrounding the use of strike replacements.
2

4. Identify other types of pressure tactics beyond strikes and lockouts and why they are being used more frequently than in the past.
5. Compare the major third-party dispute resolution mechanisms (mediation, arbitration, and fact-finding) and their strengths and weaknesses.
Learning Objectives

4. Identify other types of pressure tactics beyond strikes and lockouts and why they are being used more frequently than in the past.
5. Compare the major third-party dispute resolution mechanisms (mediation, arbitration, and fact-finding) and their strengths and weaknesses.
3

8-4
In bargaining process, negotiators do not have to reach an agreement
The National Labor Relations Act (NLRA) states that the good faith bargaining obligation “does not compel either party to agree to a proposal or require the making of a concession” [Section 8(d)].
Introduction

In the bargaining process, especially as it pertains to negotiating a union contract that specifies wages, benefits, and other terms and conditions of employment, negotiators do not have to reach an agreement.
The National Labor Relations Act (NLRA) specifically states that the good faith bargaining obligation “does not compel either party to agree to a proposal or require the making of a concession” [Section 8(d)].
4

8-5
A bargaining impasse can occur when labor and management negotiators fail to agree on a mutually acceptable terms and conditions of employment
Bargaining impasses are rare
Introduction

A bargaining impasse can occur when labor and management negotiators fail to agree on a mutually acceptable terms and conditions of employment
Bargaining impasses are rare
5

8-6
Bargaining disputes or impasses and methods for their resolution are central topics in labor relations for several reasons:
Possibility of a bargaining dispute underlies all labor negotiations because the threat of economic weapons can be used to make additional concessions
Bargaining in good faith to an impasse fulfills each side’s legal bargaining obligation
Introduction

Bargaining disputes or impasses and methods for their resolution are central topics in labor relations for several reasons:
The possibility of a bargaining dispute underlies all labor negotiations because the threat of strikes, lockouts, and other pressure tactics—also known as economic weapons—can be used to try to force the other side to make additional concessions at the bargaining table.
Bargaining in good faith to an impasse fulfills each side’s legal bargaining obligation. This is significant because the employer is then free to implement the terms of its final offer even over the objection of the union.
6

8-7
Major strikes can have devastating consequences for workers, employers, and the public
Some dispute resolution methods can be used before an impasse is reached and others are designed to prevent an impasse from occurring
The method used to resolve bargaining disputes is a defining feature of different labor relations systems or laws
Introduction

Even though infrequent, major strikes can have devastating consequences for workers, employers, and the public and are therefore important to understand. Companies can lose customers and profits and see their stock prices decline; public sector agencies can lose the support of taxpayers and voters; workers can lose income and face severe emotional and financial strain, including struggling to pay for food and rent; communities might be divided and suffer economic losses; and the public can be deprived of important goods, services, and sources of transportation.
Some dispute resolution methods can be used before an impasse is reached (especially mediation), and others are designed to prevent an impasse from occurring (especially arbitration); thus their significance is greater than a low dispute rate might otherwise indicate.
The method used to resolve bargaining disputes is a defining feature of different labor relations systems or laws.
7

After a lengthy negotiation involving a series of contract changes agreed to by management and the union, General Soft Drinks refused to make any further changes to the contract even though the union was ready to strike. The parties are:
A. committing an unfair labor practice in violation of the NLRA
B. negotiating in bad faith
C. at a bargaining impasse
D. ready for final and binding arbitration

Let’s work on a practice question. After a lengthy negotiation involving a series of contract changes agreed to by management and the union, General Soft Drinks refused to make any further changes to the contract even though the union was ready to strike. The parties are:
8

After a lengthy negotiation involving a series of contract changes agreed to by management and the union, General Soft Drinks refused to make any further changes to the contract even though the union was ready to strike. The parties are:
A. committing an unfair labor practice in violation of the NLRA
B. negotiating in bad faith
C. at a bargaining impasse
D. ready for final and binding arbitration

That’s right. They are at a bargaining impasse.
9

8-10
Categories of disputes in labor relations
Interest disputes
Rights disputes
Introduction

There are two broad categories of disputes in labor relations: interest disputes and rights disputes.
10

8-11
Interest disputes: Pertain to conflicts of interest
Higher wages versus lower labor costs
Seniority-based layoffs versus merit-based layoffs
Broad union input into managerial issues versus strict management rights to conduct business without interference
Introduction

Interest disputes pertain to conflicts of interest like, higher wages (the employees’ interest) versus lower labor costs (the employer’s interest), seniority-based layoffs versus merit-based layoffs, broad union input into managerial issues versus strict management rights to conduct business without interference. These conflicts of interest are the focus of contract negotiations which result in specific contractual terms after compromises. Compromises on these conflicts result in specific contractual terms—a wage and benefits package and language governing layoffs and management rights, for example.
11

8-12
Rights disputes – Disagreements over whether someone’s rights have been violated
Specified in the union contract
These rights are grievances
Conflicts over the application and interpretation of a contract
Introduction

In contrast, rights disputes are disagreements over whether someone’s rights have been violated. In labor relations, these rights are specified in the union contract. Rights disputes are therefore grievances, that is, conflicts over the application and interpretation of a contract.
12

Which of the following is not an interest dispute? 
A. Wage levels
B. Seniority based layoff systems
C. Whether a particular employee has been properly disciplined
D. Whether employees should participate in management decision making
MCQ

Let’s try one more practice question. Which of the following is not an interest dispute? 
13

Which of the following is not an interest dispute? 
A. Wage levels
B. Seniority based layoff systems
C. Whether a particular employee has been properly disciplined
D. Whether employees should participate in management decision making
MCQ

That’s right. The answer is C. Whether a particular employee has been properly disciplined
14

8-15
A strike occurs when employees refuse to work until an employer changes position on one or more issues
An expression of protest and dissatisfaction
Frequently intended to pressurize an employer
By withholding their labor:
Strikers seek to increase the employer’s cost of disagreement by depriving the employer of profits (private sector)
The ability to satisfy the demands of taxpayers and voters (public sector).
Strikes and Lockouts

Strikes occur when employees refuse to work until an employer changes its position on one or more issues.
A strike is fundamentally an expression of protest and dissatisfaction,
but it is also frequently intended to pressure an employer; by withholding their labor,
strikers seek to increase the employer’s cost of disagreement by depriving the employer of profits (private sector)
or the ability to satisfy the demands of taxpayers and voters (public sector).
15

8-16
Types of strikes
Economic strike: Employees might strike to win better wages, benefits, and work rules
Stem from bargaining impasses over mandatory bargaining items when union contracts are being negotiated
The most frequent form of strike is the economic strike
Strikes and Lockouts

There are a variety of reasons why employees might strike, so there are a number of different types of strikes
Economic strike—when employees strike to win better wages, benefits, and work rules;
such strikes stem from bargaining impasses over mandatory bargaining items when union contracts are being negotiated.
The most frequent form of strike is the economic strike
16

8-17
Lockout: An employer-initiated rather than worker-initiated work stoppage during a bargaining impasse
An employer tells the workers not to return until they agree to the employer’s terms
Strikes and Lockouts

Lockout—an employer-initiated rather than worker-initiated work stoppage during a bargaining impasse; in a lockout,
an employer tells the workers not to return until they agree to the employer’s terms; in an economic strike, workers refuse to work until their terms are met.
17

8-18
Unfair labor strike: A strike to protest an employer’s unfair labor practice
Strikes and Lockouts
Los Angeles, December 16, 2015—With signs held high and chants ringing across store parking lots, El Super workers at seven locations in Southern California went on strike over recent unfair labor practices (ULPs).
The strikers, members of the United Food and Commercial Workers (UFCW), are protesting violations of their rights and U.S. labor law requiring the company to bargain in good faith.

Unfair labor practice strike refers to a strike to protest an employer’s unfair labor practice.
Here is one example of unfair labor strike. Los Angeles, December 16, 2015—With signs held high and chants ringing across store parking lots, El Super workers at seven locations in Southern California went on strike over recent unfair labor practices (ULPs).
The strikers, members of the United Food and Commercial Workers (UFCW), are protesting violations of their rights and U.S. labor law requiring the company to bargain in good faith.
18

8-19
Recognition strike – If employees are striking to force an employer to recognize and bargain with their union

Strikes and Lockouts

Recognition strike—when employees strike to force an employer to recognize and bargain with their union.
On February 1, 1968, two Memphis garbage collectors, Echol Cole and Robert Walker, were crushed to death by a malfunctioning truck. Eleven days later, frustrated by the city’s response to the latest event in a long pattern of neglect and abuse of its black employees, 1,300 black men from the Memphis Department of Public Works went on strike. Sanitation workers, led by garbage-collector-turned-union-organizer T. O. Jones, and supported by the president of the American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees (AFSCME), Jerry Wurf, demanded recognition of their union, better safety standards, and a decent wage. The Memphis sanitation strike is an example of recognition strike.
19

8-20
Sympathy strike – Striking to support other workers who are on strike
Wildcat strike – Most union contracts contain a no-strike clause prohibiting work stoppages over grievances during the life of the contract
Jurisdictional strike – When a union strikes to force an employer to assign certain work to its members
Strikes and Lockouts

Sympathy strike occurs when employees strike to support other workers who are on strike (for example, by not crossing their picket line).
Wildcat strikes—most union contracts contain a no-strike clause prohibiting work stoppages over grievances during the life of the contract, and such strikes are therefore called wildcat strikes; grievance arbitration is typically used instead of wildcat strikes.
Jurisdictional strike occurs when a union strikes to force an employer to assign certain work to its members.
20

When employees go out on strike without the authorization of the union, it is called a: 
A. Secondary strike
B. Unfair labor practice strike
C. Economic strike
D. Wildcat strike
Question 1

Let’s try a few practice questions. When employees go out on strike without the authorization of the union, it is called a: 
21

When employees go out on strike without the authorization of the union, it is called a: 
A. Secondary strike
B. Unfair labor practice strike
C. Economic strike
D. Wildcat strike
Question 1

That’s right. The answer is D. Wildcat strike
22

Question 2
California Faculty Association:
Why We’re Going on Strike

Please click on the video and watch the California faculty strike. Which type of strike is it?
23

Economic strike
Question 2
California Faculty Association:
Why We’re Going on Strike

That’s right. It’s an economic strike. Professors strike to win better wages, benefits, and work rules.
24

Question 3
Verizon Workers Strike

Please click on the video and watch the Verizon workers strike. Which type of strike is it?
25

Economic strike
Question 3
Verizon Workers Strike

That’s right. It’s an economic strike. Employees strike to win better wages, benefits, and work rules.
26

Question 4
UAW Strike

Please click on the video and watch the UAW strike. Which type of strike is it?
27

Unfair labor practice strike
Question 4
UAW Strike

That’s right. It’s Unfair labor practice strike. They protest their employer’s unfair labor practice.
28

Question 5
Los Angeles teachers’ strike

Please click on the video and watch the Los Angeles teachers’ strike. Which type of strike is it?
29

Economic strike
Question 5
Los Angeles teachers’ strike

That’s right. It’s an economic strike. Teachers strike to win better wages, benefits, and work rules.
30

8-31
The legal treatment of strikes
Economic strikes and unfair labor practice strikes are protected by Section 7 of the NLRA
Workers cannot be disciplined or discharged for participating in these types of strikes—to do so would be a Section 8(a)(1) unfair labor practice.
Permissive items are outside the boundaries of the NLRA, so strikes over these issues are not protected, and workers can be fired for participating in such a strike.
Strikes and Lockouts

Economic strikes and unfair labor practice strikes are protected by Section 7 of the NLRA;
workers cannot be disciplined or discharged for participating in these types of strikes—to do so would be a Section 8(a)(1) unfair labor practice.
Permissive items are outside the boundaries of the NLRA, so strikes over these issues are not protected, and workers can be fired for participating in such a strike.

31

8-32
The legal treatment of strikes
Strikes over grievances are considered protected activity under the NLRA, but no- strike clauses in union contracts frequently forfeit this protection; as such, employees who participate in wildcat strikes can often be disciplined.
Jurisdictional strikes are prohibited by the NLRA, so unions can be ordered to cease and desist from such strikes
U.S. public policy sees striking as an economic activity to pursue things like higher wages rather than a civil liberty rooted in freedom of association.

Strikes and Lockouts

Strikes over grievances are considered protected activity under the NLRA, but no- strike clauses in union contracts frequently forfeit this protection; as such, employees who participate in wildcat strikes can often be disciplined.
Jurisdictional strikes are prohibited by the NLRA, so unions can be ordered to cease and desist from such strikes.
Because of the various limitations on the right to strike, including the legality of permanent strike replacements, U.S. public policy sees striking as an economic activity to pursue things like higher wages rather than a civil liberty rooted in freedom of association.
32

8-33
The legal treatment of strikes
All types of strikes are more likely to be illegal when conducted by government employees.
Strikes by federal government workers are prohibited
Prohibiting public sector strikes is rooted in several traditional beliefs:
Striking against the government is an unacceptable threat to the supreme authority of the government,
Public sector employee bargaining power is too high because there are no market-based checks on their demands
Government services are too critical to be interrupted.

Strikes and Lockouts

All types of strikes are more likely to be illegal when conducted by government employees.
Strikes by federal government workers are prohibited
Prohibiting public sector strikes is rooted in several traditional beliefs:
Striking against the government is an unacceptable threat to the supreme authority of the government,
Public sector employee bargaining power is too high because there are no market-based checks on their demands
Government services are too critical to be interrupted.
A number of states not only prohibit all strikes but also specify penalties for violators. New York’s Taylor law, for example, imposes a “two for one” strike penalty—for each day workers are on strike, they lose their pay for the day plus a fine equal to their day’s pay.

33

8-34
National emergency strikes
The Railway Labor Act empowers the president of the United States to create a presidential emergency board if a strike would “threaten substantially to interrupt interstate commerce to a degree such as to deprive any section of the country of essential transportation service”
Strikes and Lockouts

National Emergency Strikes
Because of the vital importance of railroads for the early 20th century economy, the Railway Labor Act empowers the president of the United States to create a presidential emergency board if a strike would “threaten substantially to interrupt interstate commerce to a degree such as to deprive any section of the country of essential transportation service” (Section 10).
34

8-35
A presidential emergency board has 30 days to investigate the dispute and issue a report, which contains nonbinding recommendations for settlement
After the report is issued, a strike can occur after a 30-day cooling-off period
When the president believes that a strike or threatened strike “will imperil the national health or safety,” a board of inquiry to investigate and report on the disputed issues can be appointed
Strikes and Lockouts

A presidential emergency board has 30 days to investigate the dispute and issue a report, which typically contains nonbinding recommendations for a settlement; after the report is issued, a strike can occur after a 30-day cooling-off period.
For the private sector more generally, the 1947 Taft–Hartley Act amendments to the NLRA created provisions for settling national emergency strikes following the Great Strike Wave of 1945–1946.
When the president believes that a strike or threatened strike “will imperil the national health or safety,” she or he can appoint a board of inquiry to investigate and report on the disputed issues (Section 206).
35

8-36
Upon receipt of this report, the president can seek a court-ordered injunction halting the strike or threatened strike for up to 80 days
NLRA provide for boards of inquiry in health care industry if strike would “substantially interrupt the delivery of health care in the locality concerned”
Strikes and Lockouts

Upon receipt of this report, the president can seek a court-ordered injunction halting the strike or threatened strike for up to 80 days.
Additional changes to the NLRA in 1974 provided for boards of inquiry in the health care industry if a strike would “substantially interrupt the delivery of health care in the locality concerned” (Section 213).
36

8-37
The NLRA and Railway Labor Act emergency procedures are not always successful in resolving bargaining disputes
Most work stoppages are economic strikes or lockouts
Strikes and Lockouts

The NLRA and Railway Labor Act emergency procedures are not always successful in resolving bargaining disputes
The most frequent form of strike is the economic strike—a work stoppage stemming from a bargaining impasse over mandatory bargaining items during negotiations for a union contract.
37

Public sector strikes are often not allowed in part because it is believed that they have the potential to seriously harm the public interest. 
True or False

Let’s try some practice questions. Public sector strikes are often not allowed in part because it is believed that they have the potential to seriously harm the public interest. True or False ?

38

Public sector strikes are often not allowed in part because it is believed that they have the potential to seriously harm the public interest. 
True or False
TRUE

The answer is true.
39

Oshkosh Corporation is a large manufacturer of military vehicles used in Afghanistan. If Oshkosh Corporation workers went out on strike and the President believed that this strike presented a significant threat to the nation’s safety, he could do all of the following except: 
A. Discharge the strikers and replace them with new workers
B. Appoint a board of inquiry to investigate the labor dispute
C. Seek a court-ordered injunction preventing the strike
D. Ask Congress to legislate a settlement to the strike

Oshkosh Corporation is a large manufacturer of military vehicles used in Afghanistan. If Oshkosh Corporation workers went out on strike and the President believed that this strike presented a significant threat to the nation’s safety, he could do all of the following except which one: 
40

Oshkosh Corporation is a large manufacturer of military vehicles used in Afghanistan. If Oshkosh Corporation workers went out on strike and the President believed that this strike presented a significant threat to the nation’s safety, he could do all of the following except: 
A. Discharge the strikers and replace them with new workers
B. Appoint a board of inquiry to investigate the labor dispute
C. Seek a court-ordered injunction preventing the strike
D. Ask Congress to legislate a settlement to the strike

That’s right. The answer is A. Discharge the strikers and replace them with new workers
41

8-42
Work stoppages have negative effects:
Decline in productivity
Loss of profits
Fall in stock prices
Loss of income for workers and stress
Strikes and Lockouts

Work stoppages have negative effects which are generally confined to the specific employer and workers involved in the strike. Some of the negative effects include the following:
Productivity declines
Profits are lost
Stock prices fall
Workers lose income and suffer from stress
42

8-43
A key aspect of a strike is a picket line
Strikers, their leaders, and supporters march outside struck employer’s locations to publicize their dispute
Convince the public not to patronize the business and workers not to cross the picket line
Create solidarity among the strikers
Build support for their cause
Strikes and Lockouts

A key aspect of a strike is a picket line
Strikers, their leaders, and supporters march outside struck employer’s locations to publicize their dispute
Picketing convinces the public not to patronize the business and workers not to cross the picket line
Picketing creates solidarity among the strikers
Picketing builds support for their cause
43

Union protesters picket Walmart

What is picketing? Please click on the video and watch union protesters picketing in front of a Walmart store.
44

8-45
In economic and unfair labor practice strikes, picketing is legal but with some legal limitations.
Picket line misconduct such as violence or vandalism is not protected by the NLRA
result in discipline and loss of recall rights at the end of the strike
potential criminal prosecution
mass picketing that blocks entrances to an employer’s property is also illegal
Injunctions by state courts are still used to restrain picketing
Strikes and Lockouts

In economic and unfair labor practice strikes, picketing is legal but with some legal limitations.
Picket line misconduct such as violence or vandalism is not protected by the NLRA and can therefore result in discipline and loss of recall rights at the end of the strike, as well as potential criminal prosecution; moreover, mass picketing that blocks entrances to an employer’s property is also illegal.
Injunctions by state courts are still used to restrain picketing, and it is not unusual for an injunction to limit the number of picketers at each entrance to an employer’s property.

45

8-46
Picketing raises several other important issues:
Employees who want to work instead of strike and therefore cross their own union’s picket line
Gives rise to sympathy strikes
The refusal to cross another union’s picket line
Picketing to pressure an employer to recognize a union is explicitly limited by the NLRA to 30 days
The legality of picketing becomes complex when more than one employer is involved.
Strikes and Lockouts

Picketing raises several other important issues:
There are employees who want to work instead of strike and therefore cross their own union’s picket line; legally employees are allowed to do this; unions have the right to discipline union members who cross a picket line, but union members also have the right to resign from the union and thus avoid discipline; discipline can consist of being expelled from the union and being assessed reasonable fines.
Picketing gives rise to sympathy strikes—the refusal to cross another union’s picket line; sympathy strikes are protected by the NLRA, but sympathy strikers can be replaced; moreover, a no-strike clause in a union contract might waive this protection.
Picketing to pressure an employer to recognize a union is explicitly limited by the NLRA to 30 days [Section 8(b)(7)(C)]; recognition strikes are legal, but after 30 days such strikes typically cannot also include picketing (though there are some exceptions); U.S. labor law seeks to discourage recognition strikes by making the certification election process available to employees but recognition strikes are nevertheless allowed.
The legality of picketing becomes complex when more than one employer is involved.
46

8-47
The decline in strike activity
The U.S. strike activity in the early 21st century is at an all-time low
In 2008, the days lost due to strikes involving at least 1,000 workers amounted to 1/100th of 1 percent of total working days
Strike rates for all negotiations are less than 1 percent in recent years
Strikes and Lockouts

The decline in strike activity
The U.S. strike activity in the early 21st century is at an all-time low
Relative to the total economy, the number of working days lost because of strikes is minuscule. In 2008, the days lost due to strikes involving at least 1,000 workers amounted to 1/100th of 1 percent of total working days

Strike rates for all negotiations are even lower—perhaps even less than 1 percent in recent years.
47

8-48
Figure 8.1 – U.S. Major Strikes (1,000 workers or more) 1950 – 2008

As shown in Figure 8.1 – U.S. Major Strikes (1,000 workers or more) 1950 – 2008/ Major strikes and lockouts plummeted from 187 in 1980 to 15 in 2008
This sharp decline in U.S. strike activity since 1980 begs the question of why strikes occur.
If the economy is strong, employees are not worried about losing their jobs, and replacement employees are difficult to find, the threat of a strike might be more viable than in a weak economy with significant anxiety about job loss and with many available replacements.
Bargaining power and the threat of a strike should affect the extent to which bargaining outcomes favor labor or management, but not the occurrence of strikes.
48

8-49
Strike activity has declined since 1980 because labor’s bargaining power has declined
Bargaining power depends on the strength of the strike threat
Bargaining power and the threat of a strike should affect the extent to which bargaining outcomes favor labor or management but not the occurrence of strikes
Strikes and Lockouts

Strike activity has declined since 1980 because labor’s bargaining power has declined
Bargaining power depends on the strength of the strike threat
Bargaining power and the threat of a strike should affect the extent to which bargaining outcomes favor labor or management but not the occurrence of strikes
49

8-50
Strike replacements – Employees used or hired to do the work of individuals on strike
Permanent strike replacements: Workers who continue in their positions after the strike ends
Temporary strike replacements – Workers who are discharged at the end of the strike
Strike Replacements

Employees used or hired to do the work of individuals on strike are called strike replacements.
Permanent strike replacements are workers who continue in their positions after the strike ends
Temporary strike replacements are workers who are discharged at the end of the strike
50

The rat (named ‘Scabby’) represents strike-breaking replacement workers, otherwise known as ‘scabs’.
Strike Replacements

A strikebreaker (sometimes derogatorily called a scab, blackleg, or knobstick) is a person who works despite an ongoing strike. Strikebreakers are usually individuals who are not employed by the company prior to the trade union dispute, but rather hired after or during the strike to keep the organization running. “Strikebreakers” may also refer to workers (union members or not) who cross picket lines to work.
51

The Court ruled that employers can hire permanent strike replacements—replacement workers who continue in their positions after the strike ends—as well as temporary strike replacements who are discharged at the end of the strike;
This is known as the Mackay doctrine
Strike Replacements
NLRB v. Mackay Radio and Telegraph Co.

Less than three months after the NLRA was signed into law in 1935, a number of telegraph operators for the Mackay Radio and Telegraph Company went on strike in San Francisco. An unfair labor practice charge was filed with the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) alleging that the company violated the NLRA by discriminating against these five strikers for their active participation in the union and the strike.
In one of its earliest decisions pertaining to the NLRA, the Supreme Court in 1938 ruled against the Mackay Radio and Telegraph Company and found it guilty of discriminating against five union activists who were part of the strike; however, the Court emphasized that the key illegal act was singling out union activists.
The Court ruled that employers can hire permanent strike replacements—replacement workers who continue in their positions after the strike ends—as well as temporary strike replacements who are discharged at the end of the strike; this is known as the Mackay doctrine after the famous 1938 decision, NLRB v. Mackay Radio and Telegraph Co.
Strikers who have been permanently replaced are not necessarily entitled to immediate reinstatement to their jobs after they end their strike but they cannot be fired in the literal sense—to do so would violate the NLRA’s ban on discharging workers for engaging in protected activity [Sections 8(a)(1) and 8(a)(3)].
As a practical matter, the status of temporary or permanent replacements is determined by what the employer tells the replacement workers when they are hired; if disputes arise later, the employer must prove that the replacements were told they were permanent; otherwise they will be considered temporary and must be terminated when strikers make an unconditional offer to return to work.

52

8-53
Replacement workers in unfair labor practice strikes
The Mackay doctrine establishes legality of using permanent strike replacements in economic strikes
Other court decisions have determined that employers cannot use permanent replacements during an unfair labor practice strike
Unfair labor practice strikers are entitled to immediate reinstatement
Strike Replacements

Replacement Workers in Unfair Labor Practice Strikes
The Mackay doctrine clearly establishes the legality of using permanent strike replacements in economic strikes,
but other court decisions have determined that employers cannot use permanent replacements during an unfair labor practice strike.
Unfair labor practice strikers are therefore entitled to immediate reinstatement and as a result, striking workers commonly claim that they are engaged in an unfair labor practice strike, but it is up to the NLRB to make that determination.
If an unfair labor practice has “anything to do with” causing a strike or if it appears that the employer’s unlawful conduct played a part in the employees’ decision to strike, then the strike is an unfair labor practice strike.
An employer’s unfair labor practice during an economic strike can convert it to an unfair labor practice strike.

53

8-54
Replacement workers in lockouts
A lockout is initiated by the employer rather than the employees
Defensive lockouts – Occur when an employer locks out employees to prevent losses from an expected strike
Offensive lockouts – Occur when an employer takes the initiative to pressure the union for a more favorable settlement
Strike Replacements

Replacement Workers in Lockouts
A lockout is initiated by the employer rather than the employees
It is useful to distinguish between defensive and offensive lockouts—a defensive lockout occurs when an employer locks out employees to prevent losses from an expected strike; in contrast,
an offensive lockout occurs when an employer takes the initiative to pressure the union for a more favorable settlement. A common reason for offensive lockout is to control the timing of the work stoppage.
To maintain a balance between employees and employers, hiring permanent replacements is not allowed

54

8-55
Replacement workers in lockouts
Both defensive and offensive lockouts are legal as long as they protect or support employers’ bargaining positions.
Lockouts are not legal if they are overly aggressive and appear to be an attempt to destroy the union.
Employers can use temporary replacements during lockouts
To maintain a balance between employees and employers, hiring permanent replacements is not allowed

Strike Replacements

Both defensive and offensive lockouts are legal (assuming an absence of illegal actions like surface bargaining) as long as they protect or support employers’ bargaining positions.
Lockouts are not legal if they are overly aggressive and appear to be an attempt to destroy the union.
Employers can use temporary replacements during lockouts—this has been interpreted as legitimate support of a bargaining position.
However, to maintain a balance between employees and employers, hiring permanent replacements is not allowed; this would be too destructive of employee rights—an employer could lock out employees against their wishes, hire permanent replacements, and decertify the union.

55

8-56
Efforts to ban permanent strike replacements
Banning the use of permanent strike replacements was the labor movement’s top legislative priority between 1985 and 1995
Arguments of labor:
Workers are essentially fired for striking, so other workers are afraid to strike
Destruction of the right to strike is asserted to disrupt the balance of the U.S. labor relations system and give employers vastly greater power
For labor, the use of permanent strike replacements is not about keeping a business operating during a strike; it is about busting unions through intensified confrontation
Strike Replacements

Efforts to Ban Permanent Strike Replacements
The 1981 firing of the striking air traffic controllers by President Reagan during the illegal PATCO strike ignited intense debates in U.S. labor relations; labor supporters have frequently argued that this event set the tenor for labor relations in the 1980s and made it acceptable to replace workers during strikes, though the true linkage may never be known.
Two years later copper producer Phelps Dodge showed that permanent strike replacements could be used to effectively break a strike and decertify a union in a legal private sector strike.
Permanent strike replacements were used in bitter strikes at Hormel (1985), International Paper (1987), Greyhound (1990), Bridgestone–Firestone (1995), the Detroit News (1995), Northwest Airlines (2005), and elsewhere.
Based on the results of these high-profile strikes, banning the use of permanent strike replacements was the labor movement’s top legislative priority between 1985 and 1995.
Labor argues that workers are essentially fired for striking, so other workers are afraid to strike.
This destruction of the right to strike is asserted to disrupt the balance of the U.S. labor relations system and give employers vastly greater power.
For labor, the use of permanent strike replacements is not about keeping a business operating during a strike—this could be accomplished with temporary replacements; it is about busting unions through intensified confrontation.

56

8-57
Arguments of business :
Business argues that the current system is balanced and that banning permanent strike replacements would favor unions
To business, the use of permanent strike replacements is about maintaining competitiveness
Strike Replacements

The fact that some companies use professional “security” companies that provide armed guards in combat fatigues or riot gear to intimidate strikers and protect replacement workers reinforces the suspicions of labor.
Business argues that the current system is balanced and that banning permanent strike replacements would favor unions
To business, the use of permanent strike replacements is not about busting unions—it is about maintaining competitiveness.
Between 1985 and 1995 the U.S. Congress considered, but did not pass, at least four proposals to limit the use of permanent strike replacements; in the public sector, only Minnesota bans the use of permanent strike replacements.
The labor movement would still like permanent strike replacements banned in the private sector; but its inability to pass this legislation in the 1990s and the continued decline in union density has caused the labor movement to shift its legislative focus to reforming the certification process through the Employee Free Choice Act.

57

NLRB Decision on Replacement Workers: Labor Minute

Please click on the video and watch the NLRB Decision on Replacement Workers
58

8-59
Boycotts, work slowdowns, and corporate campaigns increase labor’s bargaining power
Though the legality of such tactics is mixed, they have become more important and more frequent since the 1980s
As the use of strike replacements (perceived or real) has increased, labor unions have turned to tactics in which employees do not risk losing their jobs by being permanently replaced in a strike.
Unions believe that employers have escalated economic warfare through the use of strike replacements
Unions have responded by searching for alternatives to strikes leading to pressure tactics
Other Pressure Tactics

Apart from strikes, what are some of the other pressure tactics labor unions adopt to pressure employers?
Boycotts, work slowdowns, and corporate campaigns increase labor’s bargaining power by imposing costs on employers, and therefore help win more favorable settlements for employees.
Though the legality of such tactics is mixed, they have become more important and more frequent since the 1980s
As the use of strike replacements (perceived or real) has increased, labor unions have turned to tactics in which employees do not risk losing their jobs by being permanently replaced in a strike.
Unions believe that employers have escalated economic warfare through the use of strike replacements,
and unions have responded by searching for alternatives to strikes and also by further escalating conflicts with other pressure tactics.

59

8-60
Boycotts: Campaign to encourage a company’s customers to stop doing business with it
Primary employer – The company for whom the workers involved in the bargaining dispute work
Secondary employer – An organization that does not employ the workers who are involved in the dispute but has some business ties to the primary employer
Secondary boycotts: Target secondary employers
In the U.S. private sector, a boycott is generally legal if it narrowly targets the primary employer, but Section 8(b)(4) of the NLRA prohibits secondary boycotts that target secondary employers.
Other Pressure Tactics

A boycott is a campaign to encourage a company’s customers to stop doing business with it.
In the context of a bargaining dispute, a primary employer is the company for whom the workers involved in the bargaining dispute work;
a secondary employer is an organization that does not employ the workers who are involved in the dispute but has some business ties to the primary employer.
In the U.S. private sector, a boycott is generally legal if it narrowly targets the primary employer, but Section 8(b)(4) of the NLRA prohibits secondary boycotts that target secondary employers.
60

Which of the following could be considered a secondary boycott? 
A. A union encourages consumers not to purchase from Wal-Mart because Wal-Mart uses nonunion labor.
B. A union encourages consumers not to purchase from Wal-Mart because it sells products that are produced by a company that they are currently striking.
C. A union encourages its members not to purchase from Wal-Mart because Wal-Mart uses nonunion labor.
D. A union refuses to work on a job site where nonunion labor is also working.

Let’s work on a practice question. Which of the following could be considered a secondary boycott? 
61

Which of the following could be considered a secondary boycott? 
A. A union encourages consumers not to purchase from Wal-Mart because Wal-Mart uses nonunion labor.
B. A union encourages consumers not to purchase from Wal-Mart because it sells products that are produced by a company that they are currently striking.
C. A union encourages its members not to purchase from Wal-Mart because Wal-Mart uses nonunion labor.
D. A union refuses to work on a job site where nonunion labor is also working.

That’s right. The answer is B. A union encourages consumers not to purchase from Wal-Mart because it sells products that are produced by a company that they are currently striking.
62

When some labor disputes with businesses cannot be resolved, the AFL-CIO supports its affiliates by endorsing their boycotts.
A boycott is an act of solidarity by voluntarily abstaining from the purchase or use of a product or service.
AFL-CIO Boycott List
https://aflcio.org/what-unions-do/union-made-america/boycotts

When some labor disputes with businesses cannot be resolved, the AFL-CIO supports its affiliates by endorsing their boycotts.
A boycott is an act of solidarity by voluntarily abstaining from the purchase or use of a product or service.
63

HOTELS
California
Long Beach – Hilton Long Beach
Long Beach – Westin Long Beach
Los Angeles – Crowne Plaza Los Angeles Airport
Los Angeles – Hilton Los Angeles
Sacramento – Hyatt Regency Sacramento
San Francisco – Hyatt Fisherman’s Wharf
San Francisco – Le Meridien
Santa Clara – Hyatt Regency Santa Clara 
AFL-CIO Boycott List

For example, AFL-CIO boycotts the Crowne Plaza Los Angeles Airport and Hilton Los Angeles.
64

8-65
Boycotts are frequently supported by picketing
Common situs picketing is when there are multiple employers involved at a common location or site.
Common situs picketing that targets an entire worksite is illegal because it includes secondary or neutral employers.
It is now common for construction sites to include separate gates for different contractors so picketers are limited to the gate of their employer.

Other Pressure Tactics

Boycotts are frequently supported by picketing, and the legality of such conduct can be especially complex in the construction industry when employees of numerous companies are working at the same construction site.
Common situs picketing is when there are multiple employers involved at a common location or site.
Common situs picketing that targets an entire worksite is illegal because it includes secondary or neutral employers.
It is now common for construction sites to include separate gates for different contractors so picketers are limited to the gate of their employer.

65

8-66
Work slowdowns
Slowdowns try to pressure employers by imposing costs through lowered productivity, but without employees leaving their jobs and going on strike
Work-to-rule campaign: Employees do their work by exactly following the employer’s rules
Other Pressure Tactics

Apart from strikes and boycotts, some unions choose to use work slowdowns.
Slowdowns try to pressure employers by imposing costs through lowered productivity, but without employees leaving their jobs and going on strike (and thereby facing the risk of being permanently replaced).
Slowdowns can take various forms, of which the most creative is a work-to-rule campaign in which employees do their work by exactly following the employer’s rules.
On one hand, if workers are simply following management’s rules, it’s hard to argue that it is not acceptable; on the other hand, if a work-to-rule campaign is interpreted as a withholding of work that has been traditionally provided (literally slowing down work), then perhaps it is insubordination and is not protected by the NLRA; the NLRB has yet to issue definitive rulings.

66

8-67
Work slowdowns
Following are some of the other method for engaging in work slowdowns:
Partial strikes—refusal to work overtime.
Quickie strikes—very short strike (such as one day or even one hour)
Intermittent strikes—series of repeated quickie strikes.
The goal of these job actions is to disrupt an employer’s operations
As these strikes are a surprise and very short, it is difficult for the employer to hire strike replacements
Other Pressure Tactics

Following are some of the other method for engaging in work slowdowns:
Partial strikes—refusal to work overtime.
Quickie strikes—very short strike (such as one day or even one hour)
Intermittent strikes—series of repeated quickie strikes.
The goal of these job actions is to disrupt an employer’s operations; but because these strikes are a surprise and very short, it is difficult for the employer to hire strike replacements.
As these strikes are a surprise and very short, it is difficult for the employer to hire strike replacements

67

8-68
Work slowdowns
In the public sector where strikes are often illegal, workers sometimes resort to quickie strikes by conducting coordinated days of mass absenteeism.
Work slowdowns are often part of a broader campaign of workplace tactics that includes visible demonstrations of worker solidarity
such as wearing armbands and holding rallies in the parking lot before work.
Other Pressure Tactics

In the public sector where strikes are often illegal, workers sometimes resort to quickie strikes by conducting coordinated days of mass absenteeism.
Work slowdowns are often part of a broader campaign of workplace tactics—sometimes called an inside game strategy—that includes visible demonstrations of worker solidarity such as wearing armbands and holding rallies in the parking lot before work.
68

What does work-to-rule mean for Nova Scotia students and parents?

Let’s discuss one example of work-to-rule. What does work-to-rule mean for Nova Scotia students and parents?
69

Teachers will still be teaching, covering the outcomes and giving their own assessments, but won’t be doing provincial or board assessments. They’ll also be asked not to do any of that work at home.
All extra-curricular activities involving teachers or other NSTU members will be cancelled, including Christmas concerts, sports team practices and games, clubs, and after-school programs.

What does work-to-rule mean for Nova Scotia students and parents?
http://www.metronews.ca/news/halifax/2016/11/28/nova-scotia-teachers-union-to-start-work-to-rule-job-action.html

The Nova Scotia Teachers Union will be taking work-to-rule job action if no deal is reached with the province – but what does that mean?
“Basically it means we withdraw services that are not related to actually teaching our students,” NSTU president Liette Doucet said on Monday.
Here’s what work-to-rule means for students and parents:
Teachers will still be teaching, covering the outcomes and giving their own assessments, but won’t be doing provincial or board assessments. They’ll also be asked not to do any of that work at home.
All extra-curricular activities involving teachers or other NSTU members will be cancelled, including Christmas concerts, sports team practices and games, clubs, and after-school programs.
Teachers will get to school 20 minutes before classes, and leave 20 minutes after the end of the school day, as required by their contract.
Teachers won’t be doing clerical duties or data entry, and will be doing attendance on paper.
http://www.metronews.ca/news/halifax/2016/11/28/nova-scotia-teachers-union-to-start-work-to-rule-job-action.html
70

8-71
Corporate campaigns – Seek to bolster inside tactics with external pressure, directed at corporate headquarters by outsiders
Labor supporters see corporate campaigns as important tools for pressuring corporations who seem to hold all the power in a global economy
Critics see corporate campaigns as manipulating media and regulatory agencies to benefit unionized workers
Other Pressure Tactics

Corporate campaigns – Seek to bolster inside tactics with external pressure, directed at corporate headquarters by outsiders. Corporate campaigns might include consumer boycotts as part of their comprehensive strategies.
Labor supporters see corporate campaigns as important tools for pressuring corporations who seem to hold all the power in a global economy, and in the process of conducting such campaigns, for building stronger, more vibrant labor organizations with greater rank-and-file participation and stronger links with other community groups.
Critics—who are also proponents of free markets—see corporate campaigns as manipulating the media and regulatory agencies to benefit unionized workers at the expense of consumers and nonunion workers, and as ineffective in stemming organized labor’s decline.
Because corporate campaigns are outside the workplace, the legality of these campaigns is determined outside labor law.
Companies have tried to challenge corporate campaigns by charging unions with blackmail, extortion, and other illegal interference in business relations, primarily under the same law used to prosecute the mafia (the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organization Act or RICO). Free speech rights, however, have largely prevailed.
 
71

8-72
Corporate campaigns
A “corporate campaign” is an attack by a union on the ability of a company or industry to conduct its routine business.
Objective
is to generate so much pressure on the “target” that it will give in to union demands.
Other Pressure Tactics

A “corporate campaign” is an attack by a union on the ability of a company or industry to conduct its routine business.
The corporate campaign is the most recently developed economic pressure tactic that seeks to bolster inside tactics with external pressure, typically directed at corporate headquarters by outsiders such as other members of the business and financial community, consumers, politicians, and government regulators; the union’s strategy is to create negative publicity that causes these outsiders to pressure or withdraw support for the targeted company.
The Objective is to generate so much pressure on the “target” that it will give in to union demands.
72

Making Change at Walmart is a campaign run by the United Food and Commercial Workers International Union (UFCW) to improve the lives of Walmart workers. 

Here is an example of corporate campaign. Please watch this short video. Making Change at Walmart is a campaign run by the United Food and Commercial Workers International Union to improve the lives of Walmart workers.
73

Common tactics unions employ in corporate campaigns include:
Filing a stream of unfair labor practice charges against the company
Encouraging investigations of potential OSHA, wage and hour, environmental, and/or antitrust violations by the company
Causing union-paid organizers to get jobs within the company (known as “salting”)
Placing print, digital, radio, and/or TV ads attacking the company, establishing anti-company websites, and distributing anti-company materials (including emails and social media messages) to customers, shareholders, and employees
Other Pressure Tactics

Common tactics unions employ in corporate campaigns include:
Filing a stream of unfair labor practice charges against the company
Encouraging investigations of potential OSHA, wage and hour, environmental, and/or antitrust violations by the company
Causing union-paid organizers to get jobs within the company (known as “salting”)
Placing print, digital, radio, and/or TV ads attacking the company, establishing anti-company websites, and distributing anti-company materials (including emails and social media messages) to customers, shareholders, and employees

74

Introducing shareholder resolutions aimed at reducing management’s independence
Challenging the zoning or permitting of new company facilities
Alleging or implying sexual misconduct by company executives or claiming that the company does not pay its employees fairly
Recruiting celebrities, politicians, clergy, and other community leaders to put pressure on the company
Other Pressure Tactics

Employers Beware: Potential Rise in Union Corporate Campaigns

Introducing shareholder resolutions aimed at reducing management’s independence
Challenging the zoning or permitting of new company facilities
Alleging or implying sexual misconduct by company executives or claiming that the company does not pay its employees fairly
Recruiting celebrities, politicians, clergy, and other community leaders to put pressure on the company

75

We have come to the end of our lecture today. If you have any questions, please feel free to email me.
See you next class!
76

Calculate your order
Pages (275 words)
Standard price: $0.00
Client Reviews
4.9
Sitejabber
4.6
Trustpilot
4.8
Our Guarantees
100% Confidentiality
Information about customers is confidential and never disclosed to third parties.
Original Writing
We complete all papers from scratch. You can get a plagiarism report.
Timely Delivery
No missed deadlines – 97% of assignments are completed in time.
Money Back
If you're confident that a writer didn't follow your order details, ask for a refund.

Calculate the price of your order

You will get a personal manager and a discount.
We'll send you the first draft for approval by at
Total price:
$0.00
Power up Your Academic Success with the
Team of Professionals. We’ve Got Your Back.
Power up Your Study Success with Experts We’ve Got Your Back.

Order your essay today and save 30% with the discount code ESSAYHELP