Dark side of leadership- Summary
Have you ever experienced any symptoms of managerial derailment mentioned on slide 7 in the presentation Chapter 16?(Attached) How have you dealt with this situation?
Number of pages: 1
Chapter 16
The Dark Side of Leadership
© McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. Authorized only for instructor use in the classroom. No reproduction or further distribution permitted without the prior written consent of McGraw-Hill Education.
Chapter Outline
Introduction
Destructive leadership
Managerial incompetence
Managerial derailment
The ten root causes of managerial incompetence and derailment
© McGraw-Hill Education
The Dark Side of Leadership
“If you put on a blindfold and threw a dart at a map of the world, then there is a 70 percent chance that whatever country the dart lands on is run by some form of dictatorship”
R T Hogan, Hogan Assessment Systems
© McGraw-Hill Education
Introduction
There is a high level of agreement among scientists and practitioners on what constitutes bad leadership
Destructive leadership
Associated with individuals who are effective at engaging followers, building teams, and getting results through others, but who obtain results that are morally or ethically challenged or that undermine success
Managerial incompetence
Inability to engage followers, build teams, or get results through others
Managerial derailment
Describes the reasons why people in positions of authority have difficulty engaging followers, building teams, or getting results through others
© McGraw-Hill Education
Destructive Leadership
Occurs in many settings and at all organizational levels
Occurs when people in positions of authority use their team-building skills to achieve greedy, selfish, or immoral results
May be in the eye of the beholder
© McGraw-Hill Education
Managerial Incompetence
Incompetent managers have difficulties building loyal followings or getting anything done
Base rate of managerial incompetence may be 50 to 75 percent
Organizations may not need every person in a position of authority to be a competent manager
Organizations with higher percentages of competent managers occupying critical positions are more successful than those with fewer competent managers who are not well placed
© McGraw-Hill Education
Multimedia Lecture Support Package to Accompany Basic Marketing
Lecture Script 6-6
Managerial Derailment, 1
Research has identified five derailment patterns
Failure to meet business objectives
Inability to build and lead a team
Inability to build relationships with co-workers
Inability to adapt to new bosses, businesses, cultures, or structures
Inadequate preparation for promotion
© McGraw-Hill Education
Multimedia Lecture Support Package to Accompany Basic Marketing
Lecture Script 6-7
Managerial Derailment, 2
Presence of only one behavioral pattern is not enough for derailment except for a failure to meet business objectives
The five reasons for failure are universal
Awareness of why people fail in leadership positions is not enough to prevent failure
Knowing the root causes of managerial incompetence and what to do to minimize their impact improves the odds of being perceived as a competent manager
© McGraw-Hill Education
Figure 16.1: Why Leaders Fail
Jump to Figure 16.1: Why Leaders Fail, Appendix
© McGraw-Hill Education
The Ten Root Causes of Managerial Incompetence and Derailment
Situational factors
Follower factors
Lack of organizational fit
Lack of situational awareness
Lack of self-awareness
Lack of intelligence and subject matter expertise
Poor followership
Dark-side personality traits
Leadership motivation
Myths that perpetuate managerial incompetence
© McGraw-Hill Education
Situational and Follower Factors, 1
Can interfere with a person’s ability to be seen as a competent manager
Managers should control their reactions to overwhelming situational and follower factors
Incompetent managers facing hopeless situations:
Tend to keep doing what they have always done but expect to achieve different results
Try to leverage their strengths rather than change, which erodes their ability to build teams and get results
Situational factors can mask managerial incompetence
© McGraw-Hill Education
Situational and Follower Factors, 2
Episodic versus chronic incompetence
Episodic managerial incompetence: Occurs when extremely tough situational or follower events temporarily interfere with a person’s ability to build teams and get results
Experienced by all competent managers occasionally
Frequency and duration of occurrences should be limited
Chronic managerial incompetence: Occurs when taxing situational or follower events permanently disrupt a person’s ability to build teams or get results
Many people in positions of authority seem to exemplify chronic managerial incompetence
© McGraw-Hill Education
Lack of Organizational Fit
Organizational fit: Degree of agreement between personal and organizational values and beliefs
People who do not fit with an organization’s culture may wield diminishing levels of influence, which interferes with their ability to engage followers, build teams, and get results
The best thing to avoid being seen as organizational culture misfits is to minimize the risk of it happening at all
Those who do not fit run the risk of being seen as incompetent
© McGraw-Hill Education
Lack of Situational and Self-Awareness
Situational awareness: Leaders’ ability to identify the situational and follower factors affecting their teams and remain vigilant for changes
Self-awareness: Leaders’ ability to be aware of personal strengths and shortcomings and to find ways to either manage or staff around their personal knowledge and skill gaps
Causes
Managers suffering from a highly active reality distortion field
Managers failing to heed direct report feedback
© McGraw-Hill Education
Lack of Intelligence and Subject Matter Expertise
Managers’ intelligence is directly related to their ability to make decisions and build cohesive teams and get results
Shortfall in critical knowledge and a lack of team-building know-how increase the odds of managerial competence
Subject matter expertise: Relevant knowledge or experience that can be leveraged to solve problems
Team-building know-how: Degree to which a leader knows the steps and processes needed to build high-performing teams
Can be compensated for by technology and staffing to identify and prioritize problems and develop solutions that help teams succeed
© McGraw-Hill Education
Poor Followership
People in positions of authority who are criticizers, brown-nosers, and slackers are seen as incompetent managers
Brown-nosers do whatever their superiors tell them to do and are unable to make independent decisions
Slackers are so disconnected from the workplace that they are unlikely to build teams or get results
Followership affects how one leads and determines whether one is seen as a competent or incompetent manager
© McGraw-Hill Education
Dark-Side Personality Traits
Irritating, counterproductive behavioral tendencies that interfere with a leader’s ability to build cohesive teams and cause followers to exert less effort toward goal accomplishment
Decrease a leader’s ability to get results through others
Usually appear during crises or periods of high stress
Have a bigger influence on the performance of leaders than followers
Apparent only when leaders do not attend to their public image
Resemble social skills and are hard to detect in interviews
Can occur at any leadership level
Are the leading cause of managerial incompetence
© McGraw-Hill Education
Table 16.2: Dark-Side Personality Traits, 1
Traits Characteristics
Excitable Leaders with these tendencies have difficulties building teams because of their dramatic mood swings, emotional outbursts, and inability to persist on projects
Skeptical Leaders with this dark-side trait have an unhealthy mistrust of others, are constantly questioning the motives and challenging the integrity of their followers, and are vigilant for signs of disloyalty
Cautious Because these leaders are so fearful of making “dumb” mistakes, they alienate their staffs by not making decisions or taking action on issues
Reserved During times of stress these leaders become extremely withdrawn and are uncommunicative, difficult to find, and unconcerned about the welfare of their staffs
© McGraw-Hill Education
Table 16.2: Dark-Side Personality Traits, 2
Traits Characteristics
Leisurely These passive-aggressive leaders will exert effort only in the pursuit of their own agendas and will procrastinate on or not follow through with requests that are not in line with their agendas
Bold Because of their narcissistic tendencies, these leaders often get quite a bit done. But their feelings of entitlement, inability to share credit for success, tendency to blame their mistakes on others, and inability to learn from experience often result in trails of bruised followers
Mischievous These leaders tend to be quite charming but take pleasure in seeing if they can get away with breaking commitments, rules, policies, and laws. When caught, they also believe they can talk their way out of any problem
© McGraw-Hill Education
Table 16.2: Dark-Side Personality Traits, 3
Traits Characteristics
Colorful Leaders with this tendency believe they are “hot” and have an unhealthy need to be the center of attention. They are so preoccupied with being noticed that they are unable to share credit, maintain focus, or get much done
Imaginative Followers question the judgment of leaders with this tendency because these leaders think in eccentric ways, often change their minds, and make strange or odd decisions
Diligent Because of their perfectionist tendencies, these leaders frustrate and disempower their staffs through micromanagement, poor prioritization, and an inability to delegate
Dutiful These leaders deal with stress by showing ingratiating behavior to superiors. They lack spines, are unwilling to refuse unrealistic requests, won’t stand up for their staffs, and burn them out as a result
Source: Hogan Assessment Systems, The Hogan Development Survey (Tulsa, OK: 2002).
© McGraw-Hill Education
Leadership Motivation
Those who lack the motivation to lead will likely make poor leaders
Team members who are smart, have plenty of expertise, and have no dark-side personality traits may be promoted into leadership roles
People being promoted may have questionable leadership skills and no desire to lead but may accept the promotion out of gratitude
Those wanting to become leaders need to be clear on their reasons for moving into positions of authority
People have a choice when it comes to getting promoted, but their choices will have a profound impact on the people they lead
© McGraw-Hill Education
Successful versus Effective Leaders
Successful leaders: Network, stay on top of office politics, flatter superiors, do what their superiors want, demonstrate loyalty, do not make any waves, and self-promote
Effective leaders: Engage and develop followers, secure resources, clear obstacles, build high-performing teams, devise strategies to win, and drive results
© McGraw-Hill Education
Myths That Perpetuate Managerial Incompetence
Leadership concepts that are adopted with the right intentions but contribute to managerial incompetence problems
Leader humility: Reduces the chances of being promoted
Authenticity: Followers want leaders who can adjust their behavior to situational and follower demands and keep their egos under control
Integrity: Managers often break commitments, and followers end up trusting the wrong people
Servant leadership: Most managers enjoy perks and often have their own interests in mind
If leaders take care of their followers, then followers will take care of customers and teams will achieve winning results
© McGraw-Hill Education
Summary
There are many ways for people in positions of authority to fail, and most people are not particularly effective leaders
What constitutes good or destructive leadership may not be straightforward
People with managerial incompetence have difficulties engaging followers, building teams, or getting results through others
Managerial derailment pertains to the reasons why competent managers can be seen as ineffective, and knowing the reasons is not enough to prevent it from happening
Leaders and leaders-to-be can take steps to mitigate the impact of the root causes for managerial incompetence and derailment on their ability to build teams and get results
© McGraw-Hill Education
appendix
Figure 16.1: Why Leaders Fail, Appendix
It has three circles that intersect each other in such a manner that some area of one circle is shared with another. The circle on the top is labeled leader. There are six points inside it that read lack of self-awareness, lack of situational awareness, lack of intelligence and expertise, leadership motivation, poor followership, and dark-side personality traits.
The circle on the bottom-left side is labeled followers. There are five points inside it that read disgruntled employees, criticizers, slackers, brown-nosers, and disruptive worker cliques.
The circle on the bottom-right side is labeled situation. There are eight points inside it that read competitive threats, globalization, government regulations, natural disasters, wars, mergers, leadership b s, and reorganizations. The area of intersection of the leader and the situation circles that is not part of the followers circle is labeled lack of fit.
Jump back to Figure 16.1: Why Leaders Fail
© McGraw-Hill Education