Home Assignment 1 - Quick Trip Case Study

Assignment 1 – Quick Trip Case Study

1) 6-7 pages

2) Please go through the question and RUBRIC very carefully.

3) You need to cover all the areas and points.

4) Quick Trip reference is also attached.

Assignment1: Quick Trip Case Study

worth 250 points

Complete an analysis of the QuickTrip. Assess the organizational layout, performance metrics, and the technology that

is used to measure performance and connect with consumers.

The QuickTrip Case Study is available in the course shell. It is also available at the following

link: http://supplychainresearch.com/images/quik_trip

Write a six to seven (6-7) page paper in which you:

1. Evaluate QuickTrip operations strategy and explain how the organization seeks to gain a competitive

advantage in terms of sustainability.

2. Analyze how operation management activities affect the customer experience. Select two (2) operation

management challenges and provide the solutions for confronting them.

3. Examine QuickTrip value chain and evaluate its effectiveness to operations in terms of quality, value creation,

and customer satisfaction.

4. Determine the different types of performance measurements that can be used to measure QuickTrip

service-

delivery system design. Select at least two (2) types that can be applied and provide justifications

for

the

selection.

5. Examine the different types of technologies applied to QuickTrip service operations and evaluate how the

technologies strengthen the

value chain.

6. Use at least two (2) quality resources in this assignment that do not include the initial case

study. Note: Wikipedia and similar websites do not qualify as quality resources.

Your assignment must follow these formatting requirements:

• Be typed, double spaced, using Times New Roman font (size 12), with one-inch margins on all sides; citations

and references must follow (SWS). Check with your professor for any additional instructions.

• Include a cover page containing the title of the assignment, the student’s name, the professor’s name, the

course title, and the date. The cover page and the reference page are not included in the required assignment

page length.

The specific course learning outcomes associated with this assignment are:

• Apply the concept of operations management.

• Compare and contrast the difference between a supply chain and a value chain.

• Analyze the types of measures used for decision making.

• Analyze the five key competitive priorities and their relationship to operations strategy.

• Analyze different types of technology and their roles in manufacturing and service operations.

• Use technology and information resources to research issues in operations management.

• Write clearly and concisely about operations management using proper writing mechanics.

http://supplychainresearch.com/images/quik_trip

https://blackboard.strayer.edu/bbcswebdav/institution/STANDARDIZED/StrayerWritingStandards/Strayer_Writing_Standards

Points: 250 Assignment 1: QuickTrip Case Study

Criteria

Unacceptable

Below 60% F

Meets

Minimum

Expectations

60-69% D

Fair

70-79% C

Proficient

80-89% B

Exemplary

90-100% A

1. Evaluate

QuickTrip’s

operations strategy
and explain how
the organization
seeks to gain a
competitive
advantage in terms
of sustainability.

Weight: 15%

Did

not submit or

incompletely

evaluated
QuickTrip’s
operations
strategy; Did not
submit or
incompletely
explained how
the organization
seeks to gain a
competitive
advantage in
terms of
sustainability.

Insufficiently

evaluated
QuickTrip’s
operations
strategy;
Insufficiently
explained how
the
organization
seeks to gain a
competitive
advantage in
terms of
sustainability.

Partially

evaluated
QuickTrip’s
operations
strategy;
Partially
explained how
the
organization
seeks to gain
a competitive
advantage in
terms of
sustainability.

Satisfactorily

evaluated QuickTrip’s
operations strategy;
Satisfactorily
explained how the
organization seeks to
gain a competitive
advantage in terms of
sustainability.

Thoroughly evaluated
QuickTrip’s operations
strategy;

Thoroughly explained
how the organization
seeks to gain a
competitive advantage
in terms of
sustainability.

2. Analyze how
operation
management
activities affect the
customer
experience. Select
two (2) operation
management
challenges and
provide the
solutions for
confronting them.

Weight: 20%

Did not submit or

incompletely
analyzed how
operation
management
activities affect
the customer
experience. Did
not submit or
incompletely
selected two (2)
operation
management
challenges; Did
not submit or
incompletely
provided the
solutions for
confronting
them.

Insufficiently
analyzed how
operation
management
activities affect
the customer
experience.
Insufficiently
selected two
(2) operation
management
challenges;
Insufficiently
provided the
solutions for
confronting
them.

Partially
analyzed how
operation
management
activities affect
the customer
experience.
Partially
selected two
(2) operation
management
challenges;
Partially
provided the
solutions for
confronting
them.

Satisfactorily analyzed
how operation
management activities
affect the customer
experience.
Satisfactorily selected
two (2) operation
management
challenges;
Satisfactorily

provided

the solutions for
confronting them.

Thoroughly analyzed
how operation
management activities
affect the customer
experience. Thoroughly
selected two (2)
operation management
challenges; Thoroughly
provided the solutions
for confronting them.

3. Examine
QuickTrip’s value
chain and evaluate
its effectiveness to
operations in terms
of quality, value
creation, and
customer
satisfaction.

Weight: 15%

Did not submit or
incompletely
examined
QuickTrip’s value
chain; Did not
submit or
incompletely
evaluated its
effectiveness to
operations in
terms of quality,
value creation,
and customer
satisfaction.

Insufficiently
examined
QuickTrip’s
value chain;
Insufficiently
evaluated its
effectiveness
to operations in
terms of
quality, value
creation, and
customer
satisfaction.

Partially
examined
QuickTrip’s
value chain;
Partially
evaluated its
effectiveness
to operations
in terms of
quality, value
creation, and
customer
satisfaction.

Satisfactorily
examined QuickTrip’s
value chain;
Satisfactorily
evaluated its
effectiveness to
operations in terms of
quality, value creation,
and customer
satisfaction.

Thoroughly examined
QuickTrip’s value chain;
Thoroughly evaluated
its effectiveness to
operations in terms of
quality, value creation,
and customer
satisfaction.

Criteria

Unacceptable
Below 60% F
Meets
Minimum
Expectations
60-69% D

Fair
70-79% C

Proficient
80-89% B

Exemplary
90-100% A

4. Determine the

different types

performance

measurements

that can be

used to

measure

QuickTrip’s
service-

delivery

system design.

Select at least

two (2) types

that can be

applied and

provide

justifications

for the
selection.
Weight: 20%
Did not submit or
incompletely

determined the

different types of

performance

measurements that

can be used to

measure
QuickTrip’s

service-delivery

system design. Did

not submit or
incompletely

selected at least

two (2) types that

can be

applied;

Did not submit or
incompletely
provided

justifications for

the selection.

Insufficiently
determined the
different types of
performance
measurements

that can be used

to measure

QuickTrip’s
service-delivery
system design.
Insufficiently
selected at least
two (2) types
that can be
applied;
Insufficiently
provided
justifications for
the selection.
Partially
determined the
different types

of performance

measurements
that can be used
to measure
QuickTrip’s
service-delivery
system design.
Partially
selected at least
two (2) types
that can be
applied;
Partially
provided
justifications
for the
selection.
Satisfactorily
determined the
different types
of performance
measurements
that can be used
to measure
QuickTrip’s
service-delivery
system design.
Satisfactorily
selected at least
two (2) types
that can be
applied;
Satisfactorily
provided
justifications
for the
selection.

Thoroughly determined

the different types of

performance

measurements that can be

used to measure

QuickTrip’s service-

delivery system design.

Thoroughly selected at

least two (2) types that

can be applied;

Thoroughly provided

justifications for the

selection.

5. Examine the

different types

technologies

applied to

QuickTrip’s

service

operations and

evaluate how

the
technologies

strengthen the

value chain.
Weight: 15%
Did not submit or
incompletely

examined the

different types of
technologies
applied to
QuickTrip’s

service

operations;

Did not submit or
incompletely

evaluated how the

technologies
strengthen the
value chain.
Insufficiently
examined the
different types of
technologies
applied to
QuickTrip’s
service
operations;
Insufficiently

evaluated how

the technologies

strengthen the
value chain.
Partially
examined the
different types

of technologies

applied to
QuickTrip’s
service
operations;
Partially
evaluated how
the technologies
strengthen the
value chain.
Satisfactorily
examined the
different types
of technologies
applied to
QuickTrip’s
service
operations;
Satisfactorily
evaluated how
the technologies
strengthen the
value chain.

Thoroughly examined the

different types of

technologies applied to

QuickTrip’s service

operations; Thoroughly

evaluated how the

technologies strengthen

the value chain.

6. 3 references

Weight: 5%

No references

provided

Does not meet

the required

number of

references; all

references poor

quality

choices.

Does not meet
the required
number of

references;

some references

poor quality

choices.

Meets number

of required

references; all

references high

quality choices.

Exceeds number of

required references; all

references high quality

choices.

7. Clarity, writing

mechanics,

and formatting

requirements

Weight: 10%

More than 8 errors

present

7-8 errors

present

5-6 errors

present

3-4 errors

present

0-2 errors present

_______

Professo
develop
effective

Copyrig
write Ha
photoco

Z E Y N E

In
conve
his an
thank

pr
the
yo
ke
un

Sin
he con
in

we pl
most

Fo
Carol
marke
openi
Septe

The

By
were
also s
the U
or app

_______________

or Zeynep Ton prep
ped solely as the ba
e or ineffective man

ght © 2011 Presiden
arvard Business Sc

opied, or otherwise

P T O N

uikTrip

November 2
enience stores
nnual addres
k you and let y

Once again,
ofit which w
e vast majori

our average an
eep raving ab
nderstand and

nce its foundi
ntinued addr
cities,” he sa

lan to have 73
growth will c

or 2011, QT p
ina. Tradition
et was satura
ing stores in
mber 2012.

U.S. Conv

y December 2
single-store o
old gasoline a

U.S. market.3 T
proximately 4

_______________

pared this case wit
asis for class discus
nagement.

nt and Fellows of H
hool Publishing, Bo
reproduced, poste

2010, Chet C
s and son of o
s to more th
you know wh

, we outperfo
was almost do

ity of you are
nnual return
bout our serv
d adapt to the

ing in 1958, Q
essing his At

aid. “The next
32 stores. We
come in new m

lanned to ope
nally, when Q
ated. But Ch
North Carol

venience S

010, there we
operations.1 S
and diesel fue
The average c
400,000 a yea

________________

th the assistance of
ssion. Cases are no

Harvard College. T
oston, MA 02163, o

ed, or transmitted, w

Cadieux (Che
one of QT’s f

han 1,000 emp
hat a great job

ormed our c
ouble that of t
e shareholde
on investmen

vice. But I do
e present and

QT had opene
lanta employ
t four years w
have saturate
markets.”

en 33 new sto
QT entered a
het thought i
ina at twice

Store Indu

ere 146,341 co
Sales in 200

el, accounting
convenience s
ar.4 The avera

_______________

Research Associat
ot intended to serv

To order copies or
or go to www.hbsp
without the permis

et), CEO of t
ounders, Che
ployees from
b you are doin

ompetition th
the top quart
rs in

QuikTr

nt was 18% du
on’t want yo
future wants

ed over 500 st
yees. “And for
will provide e
ed some mark

ores in existin
new market,
it was time t
the usual sp

ustry

onvenience sto
had been $5
g for approxim
store with fue
age cost to bu

_______________

te Matthew Preble
ve as endorsements

request permission
p.harvard.edu/edu
ssion of Harvard Bu

the Tulsa, O
ester Cadieux

m the chain’s
ng,” Chet beg

his year. In
tile of compe
rip so you sh
uring the last

ou to take th
s of our custom

tores, but Che
r all that we h
exciting oppo
kets and are

ng markets a
, it opened 10
to be more a
peed, with as

ores in the U
511 billion.2 O
mately 80% ($
eling stations

uild and open

_______________

of the Global Rese
s, sources of prima

n to reproduce ma
ucators. This publica
usiness School.

Oklahoma-bas
x (Cadieux), s
Atlanta-area

gan.

2010, we po
etitors in our
hould be happ
t decade. And

his for grante
mers.

et had future
have accompl
ortunities for
beginning to

and enter a ne
0 to 12 stores

aggressive. H
s many as 20

United States,
Over 80% of c
$328.7 billion
s served 1,100
n a new store

9 – 6 1 1 –
R E V : J U N E 2 3

________________

earch Group. HBS c
ary data, or illustra

aterials, call 1-800-5
ation may not be d

ed QuikTrip
stood up to d
stores. “I wa

sted a by-sto
business. Als
py to hear th

d our custome
ed. We need

growth in mi
lished, we are

r growth. By
saturate othe

ew market—N
s per year unt
e was consid

0 stores opene

over 60% of w
convenience

n) of all fuel sa
0 customers a

e, including a

– 0 4 5
3 , 2 0 1 1

______

cases are
ations of

545-7685,
digitized,

(QT)
deliver
ant to

ore
so,
hat
ers
to

ind as
e only
2014,
ers, so

North
til the

dering
ed by

which
stores
ales in
a day,

all real

611-045 QuikT

rip

estate, construction, and inventory costs, was roughly $2.8 million dollars in urban markets and
slightly under $2 million in rural areas.

Convenience stores differed from grocery and drug stores in that they were smaller, carried fewer
products, and stayed open longer. Stores averaged about 2,700 square feet of selling space6 and
offered a range of items including hot and prepackaged foods, fountain and bottled drinks, grocery
items, coffee, snacks, beer, tobacco products, and lottery tickets; some of the larger chains also offered
private-label foods and drinks. Convenience stores offered customers a quick shopping experience;
the average customer spent only three to four minutes from arrival to departure.

There was a great variety in the scope of operations and range of products. U.S.-based 7-Eleven
operated 32,000 stores in North America, Asia, Europe, Australia, and Mexico8 while Sheetz operated
365 stores across six states in the eastern U.S. and specialized in made-to-order fresh food items.9
Some convenience stores offered dining areas; some shared retail space with fast-food restaurants,
banks, and other retailers.10

QuikTrip’s Evolution

QT was founded in 1958 in Tulsa, Oklahoma by childhood friends Chester Cadieux—Chet’s
father—and Burt Holmes. After graduating college and serving three years in the U.S Air Force,
Cadieux wanted to start his own retail business and found a partner in Burt Holmes. The two
decided to open a convenience store. Their first location was in their hometown of Tulsa and sold
only groceries. In the early years, Cadieux worked the night shift alone, which, he later joked, earned
him the right to be president and CEO. He held both positions for over 40 years until succeeded by
his son Chet in 2002. (See Exhibit 1 for QuikTrip’s major milestones.)

Under Cadieux’s leadership, QT expanded into large Midwestern metropolitan areas in the late
1960s and then into other large U.S. cities. Initially, QT’s growth strategy was to open stores
piecemeal in small towns around its major Midwestern markets.11 Cadieux observed that, while this
offered employees rapid promotions, it placed inexperienced employees in critical jobs.12 Cadieux
scrapped this strategy when he realized that small markets would not generate enough profit for
future large-scale growth.13 QT ultimately closed stores in 37 small markets to focus on what Cadieux
called the “3Ms—Million Metropolitan Markets—those markets that have populations exceeding a
million.”14

In 1971, QT started selling gasoline and closed stores that could not support pumping stations. It
required a large upfront investment to enter this highly competitive business and it was more than
two decades before QT had established a reputation for selling high-quality gas at low prices. In the
mid-1990s, the company invested millions of dollars in improving the quality of its gas and began a
new advertising campaign which involved handing out coupons for free gas, giving away floor mats
through car dealers and mechanics, and offering to fix any car problems caused by QT’s gasoline.

Chet explained:

My father worked mercilessly to get better supply-chain advantage, quality, branding, and
prices to become the best at selling gasoline. Our branded gasoline is now recognized as top-
tier by companies like BMW and Audi. Our customers perceive us having both great quality
and the lowest price. And we’re confident about the future of our business because our
breakeven on gas is lower than any of our competitors. That means that, if, someday, people
quit buying gasoline, all of our competitors will go out of business before we do.

QuikTrip

611-045

In the 2000s, food industry experts stated that close to one-fifth of all meals in the U.S. were eaten
in the car16. QT, observing this trend and hearing from its own customers that they wanted to buy
fresh food on the go, decided in 2007 to sell fresh food. Ron Jeffers, vice president of operating
systems, explained: “Our customers used to take our products home to cook. But now they are very
active, constantly going from activity to activity. And they want food they can eat while driving to
the next activity. Mealtime is not a time they want to spend.”

Instead of preparing fresh food in the stores, QT decided to invest in developing centralized
QuikTrip Kitchens (QTKs), which prepared and delivered fresh foods—never-frozen baked goods,
sandwiches, salads, and fruit—to each store daily. On entering the fresh-food market, QT set out to
become the best gasoline, convenience, and food retailer in the eyes of its customers, competitors, and
employees. Chet knew, however, that it would be a while before customers could equate convenience
stores with good food.

“Our challenge is to be recognized as a gasoline retailer that also sells good food. Our QTKs were
intentionally built for much higher volume than we run today. That means that we are operating well
below capacity and, as a result, right now they lose millions of dollars a year. I know that and I don’t
mind because I am confident that it will pay off in the long term. Like my father did with gasoline,
we are going to work on food until we perfect it and reach that high volume. “

QuikTrip in 2011

By January 2011, QT had over 10,000 employees, owned and operated 549 stores in 11 U.S.
metropolitan areas (see Exhibit 2 for QT’s markets and dates of entry), and generated more than $

billion in yearly revenues. Gasoline accounted for two-thirds of revenues but only one-third of
profits; two-thirds of profits came from store merchandise.

Store merchandise included fresh prepared foods, snacks, tobacco products, beer, grocery items,
and bottled, fountain, frozen, and hot beverages. QT also sold private-label food and drink items,
including its QT-branded coffee, energy drinks, sports drink, and frozen shakes as well as its Hotzi
brand breakfast items and the fresh-food items sent daily from its QT Kitchens. QT kept prices
competitive by only offering the core products its customers wanted and selling them in high
volumes. “In all categories we sell, we are a price leader in the convenience channel,” Chet explained.
“In high-volume categories like soda, beer, and gasoline, our prices are as cheap as Wal-Mart’s.”

QT stores were highly productive. In 2010, merchandise sales per labor hour was $94.67 for the
top quartile of convenience and gas stores, $85.50 for the average convenience and gas stores, and
$142.30 for QT. QT stores had much higher sales volume than competitor stores. Merchandise sales
per square foot for the top quartile of the industry was $13.83 per week, with an average store size of
2454 square feet. Merchandise sales per square foot for the average in the industry was $10.04, with
an average store size of 2000 square feet. For QT, merchandise sales per square foot was $15.48 per
week, with an average store size of 4343 square feet. Motor fuel sales for the top quartile of the
industry was 43,889 gallons per store-week and for the average 29,044 gallons per store-week. The
same metric for QT was 91,995.

Many in the company attributed QT’s success to the systematic practice of five core values by all
employees, from part-time store clerks to the CEO. These were: (1) Be the best, (2) never be satisfied,
(3) focus long-term, (4) do what’s right for QT, and (5) do the right thing. Focusing on the long term,
even when it came at the expense of short-term financial losses, drove big investment decisions as
well as small operational decisions. For example, recognizing that clean bathrooms would bring more
traffic into the stores, QT invested $12 million over three years to renovate its bathrooms. Determined

611-045

QuikTrip

to maintain a “family environment,” QT did not sell drug paraphernalia, rolling papers, or
pornographic magazines, although some of these were popular and profitable items. Chet provided
an example of QT’s willingness to take on even a long-term loss for the long-term good of its
employees:

When I became the CEO, I realized that there were hundreds of employees who had been
working for us for many years and who were working until midnight many days of the week.
That made it very difficult to have a normal life with a family. The only way to change that
was to add a full-time person in every store. It cost us $10 million a year for the rest of the
company’s history. I believe that it reduced turnover. It probably would have been difficult to
do this if we were a public company.

QuikTrip remained privately held and ranked 37th on the 2010 Forbes list of America’s largest
private companies.17 The Cadieux family owned 65% of QT, upper management owned 13%, outside
investors owned 10% and the remaining 12% of stock was owned by employees through QT’s stock-
ownership and profit-sharing/401K plans.

Culture

QuikTrip’s purpose is to provide an opportunity for employees to grow and succeed.
— QuikTrip’s Purpose Statement

Since its beginnings, QT had focused on finding the best people, paying them well, and promoting
from within. However, company culture had changed significantly over time. During its first
decades, QT was highly results-oriented and store operations were militaristic. As Jeffers explained,
“Until the draft ended in 1973, most employees had served in the military and were used to an
autocratic system. In the years after, new employees without military experience clashed with our
‘Yes sir, no sir’ type of mentality. We had two cultures clashing.”

By the mid-1980s, Cadieux appreciated that QT’s culture needed to change when he saw that
some store managers and supervisors focused more on results than on how they achieved those
results. After some employees complained to Cadieux that they felt disrespected and mistreated by
their managers, he sent a memo to all managers expressing his anger at how some employees were
treated. (See Exhibit 3 for Cadieux’s memo.) At this point, Cadieux determined that QT needed to
standardize store policies and procedures. As he put it, the company “had become large enough to
act more responsibly.”18 QT began recording and standardizing policies regarding disciplinary
procedures, sales, performance evaluations, and much else.

QuikTrip’s 1995 Reengineering Initiative

But in 1995, QT’s senior management still sensed that the chain was not delivering consistent
levels of operational excellence across all its regions. (See Exhibit 4 for QT’s purpose and core values
statements.) Jeffers elaborated: “Before the mid-1990s, our standards were vague. Basically, who you
worked for was the rule book and managers had a lot of subjective judgment. For example, one
standard was to look professional—such as no facial hair or visible tattoos—but we never specified
what that meant and each store manager interpreted it differently. So in 1995, we launched a major
reengineering effort.”

Jeffers, QT’s director of operations at the time, worked with 13 store managers from across the
company for a year and a half to analyze and reevaluate QT’s processes and policies.20 They mapped

QuikTrip 611-045

store operations, then timed and standardized them. They each spoke with thousands of customers to
understand what QT’s clientele valued or wanted changed in their QT experiences. They also created
standards for how employees and stores should appear in an effort to create a consistent shopping
experience. “It was important to involve store managers in this process because that generated huge
buy-in,” Jeffers explained. “The managers were the ones mapping the processes, timing them, and
talking to customers. And once we were finished, it was the managers who explained what we did
and why to everyone.” From this effort, QT established new policies and procedures regarding
customer service, store appearance and layout, training, employee dress and appearance, the daily
activities worksheet (DAW), and the first standardized mystery shopper questionnaire.

As part of this reengineering effort, QT also created processes to involve employees in process
improvement. The company created resource groups for every position in the store, from part-time
clerk to store manager. Members of a resource group within a divisiona got together and discussed
problems and improvement opportunities related to store processes or products. Based on these
meetings, managers from each division recommended process or product improvement
opportunities to corporate. Store managers in the resource group were chosen by division managers
and the other group members were voted on by store managers once a year.

QuikTrip Store Network

QT stores were open 24 hours a day, 365 days a year. All stores had a standard layout and
merchandise selection determined by the corporate office to provide a consistent shopping
experience across all regions. All stores had unlocked multi-person restrooms. In 2010, QT began
experimenting with a new Generation 3 (Gen3) store format. (See Exhibit 5 for store images.) Gen3
stores were 20% larger than standard QT stores and featured coffee bars with premium beverages as
well as a broader range of fresh products. Both customers and employees were enthusiastic. On
average, these stores sold twice as much as a regular QT store and the coffee, ice cream, and smoothie
sales actually exceeded cigarette sales. It was expected that most new stores would be Gen3.

Because most customers drove to QT, the stores were in stand-alone locations with ample parking
and enough fueling terminals to ensure quick service. Chet explained: “There are many things we
are great at, but there are two things we are the best at—choosing the best people and choosing the
best locations.” Store locations were chosen using an internally designed statistical model that took
into account the demographics, crime rates, and vehicle traffic of any given location and estimated
total market sales volume and how much revenue the new store could expect to draw from nearby
competitors.

About 70% of store merchandise came directly from QT distribution centers (in Atlanta, Kansas
City, and Phoenix) or QT Kitchens (in Atlanta, Kansas City, Phoenix, and Tulsa), while 30% came
directly from vendors such as Coca-Cola and Frito-Lay. QT Kitchens delivered to each store daily,
while QT distribution centers delivered three times a week. Typically, a truck from a QT distribution
center served 12 stores and one from QT Kitchens served nine stores. Stores did their own ordering
from QT distribution centers, but ordering from QTKs was decided centrally by each division.

a QT stores were divided into nine divisions based on geography.

611-045 QuikTrip

Customer Service at QuikTrip

QT found it hard to describe its typical customer. Many customers shopped daily for their
morning coffee, paper, or doughnut. Others visited several times a day. About half of transactions
came from customers who shopped at QT at least once a day. For some, QT was the neighborhood
convenience and gasoline retailer, while others stopped in on the way to work—or during work—for
lunch or coffee. Many customers shopped at multiple QuikTrip stores—close to work, close to home,
on the way to the gym—and would drive past other retailers to find a QT (see Exhibit 6 for customer
loyalty in gasoline and QT’s market share in gasoline in different markets).

QT differed from other convenience stores by offering fast and friendly customer service and
meticulously clean stores and facilities. Kevin Thornton, QT’s Atlanta division manager, explained
the QT difference: “Every convenience store sells Coke and Pepsi. But we serve the customer faster,
in a friendly and clean environment, and have the best prices. We take a lot of pride in this; it’s
ingrained in our culture.”

Fast service was essential to QT’s success and differentiation in the convenience store market.
Customers came to QT to get in and out as quickly as possible and would not come in if the parking
lot or store were full. Store layout was designed to help customers find products as quickly as
possible. All stores had the same layout and the same merchandise, so no matter what QT store
customers visited, they could find the same products in the same places.

Employees shared cash registers; any employee could use any cash register at any time. Rather
than scan high-volume items, employees used speed keys to speed up the checkout. Chet elaborated:
“If a customer buys a fountain drink, it is faster to use speed keys and mentally calculate change than
to go through the trouble of taking the drink, scanning it, and having the register calculate how much
change to give back.” Speed of service increased with experience. Patty Donovan, a store manager
with over 15 years of experience, found that she had memorized some of her customers’ shopping
patterns and would begin ringing up their purchases before they finished shopping. The company
had strict customer-service policies, such as the “Three to One Standard”: There should never be
more than three customers per employee waiting at a cash register and customers should never have
to stand in line for more than one minute. Available employees were expected to drop everything
and help at the registers if more than three customers were in line.

Consistency in speed, friendliness, product offerings, and cleanliness was another source of
differentiation. “You can go in to any QT and get the same service,” said Atlanta-area store manager
Corey Alverson. “Competitors try. They can copy our layouts and products but they can’t copy our
consistency.” QT had developed a number of protocols and safeguards to ensure consistency; two of
the most effective were its daily activities worksheet (DAW) and its mystery shopper program.

Daily Activity Worksheet

The DAW was a tool that helped managers in each shift ensure that everything got done. The
DAW was divided into three sections: register time, tasks (such as stocking merchandise), and
upkeeps (such as cleaning bathrooms and emptying trash). For each shift, the manager would print
and post the DAW, which told all employees what needed to be done and when. When an employee
completed a task or upkeep, he or she initialed the worksheet, allowing everyone to see which tasks
had been completed. Managers could assign jobs to specific employees or simply post the DAW and
trust that employees would complete all jobs at their own pace. “We are very careful about what we
put in the DAW,” Jeffers explained. “Our belief is that, if you are not going to have a way to inspect

QuikTrip 611-045
7

what you want people to do, then don’t bother asking them to do it. If something shows up in the
DAW, it’s either on a supervisor’s checklist or part of a customer-service evaluation.”

The DAW also helped with staffing. QT tracked how long each type of register transaction (cash,
credit card, or check), upkeep, and task took and combined these data with forecasted traffic and
sales data to determine staffing requirements in hourly increments. For example, QT knew that each
cup of coffee sold took five seconds of labor to ring up when paid for with cash and ten seconds of
labor to keep the coffee area stocked and clean. Based on these estimates, store managers knew how
much labor was needed on each shift and constructed schedules for part-time and full-time clerks
accordingly.

Mystery Shopper Visits

QT invested in developing its own mystery shopper program to evaluate each store’s customer
service. The mystery shoppers were hired by QT’s corporate office, with their identities kept secret
from all store employees; they visited each QT store once a week. QT mystery shoppers were paid
twice the industry average and could be terminated if discovered. Periodically, a second mystery
shopper would visit a store to make sure the first mystery shopper had evaluated it accurately.
Mystery shoppers evaluated every element of customer service—employee appearance, store
cleanliness, and merchandise—based on standards developed from customer feedback. An
employee’s bonus—amounting to approximately 10% of his or her pay—was based on the store
team’s performance for the mystery shop. If a store received a 100% score, the employee at the
register when the mystery shopper visited was awarded an additional $50 above and beyond his or
her regular mystery shop bonus. Every week, about 20% of the stores received a full score.

Jeffers explained how important it was that the mystery-shopper questionnaire had been based on
customer feedback: “Up to 1995, the customer-service standards were really set in the boardroom by
a board of directors. But now, the standards are based on what thousands of our customers tell us. I
think this is still one of the things our competitors miss out on. They want to tell people how to do it
from up here. But nobody goes and talks to the real consumer. They want to set a standard based on
their beliefs from their day and time and, in many cases, I think they miss the boat because they’re
not listening to the people who really bring the money in.”

The questionnaire changed every two to five years or when the stores went through a major
change, such as altering the layout. (See Exhibit 7 for criteria used in the questionnaire.) The
questionnaire update process was intensive; two store managers from each division interviewed
1,000 customers (500 from urban and 500 from suburban settings) in their division. Interviews lasted
15 to 20 minutes and the customers received five-dollar gas cards for their help. QT also conducted
Web surveys that netted an average of 50,000 customer responses each time the questionnaire was
updated.

In 2010, the average mystery shopper score for QT stores was 94%, with a very small standard
deviation. If the score for a store fell below 85%–a rare occurrence—disciplinary action was taken.
QT’s mystery shoppers routinely “shopped” a competitive set across many channels. The
competitive set included Chick-fil-A and MacDonald’s fast-food restaurants, HyVee and Kroger
grocery stores, Walgreens and CVS pharmacies, Wal-Mart, and several convenience and gas stores
including Shell, Chevron, Exxon, RaceTrac, Casey’s, Kum and Go, and 7-Eleven. In 2010, the
composite average score for the competitive set was 76.1%. The best score in the competitive set was
85% (Exxon) and the worst was 61% (7-Eleven). Wal-Mart and MacDonald’s scored close to average.

611-045 QuikTrip
8

Managing the Store Network

Each store was led by a store manager who was assisted by four other managers: first assistant,
second assistant, night assistant, and relief assistant. Each of the three shifts was covered by at least
one manager. (See Exhibit 8 for QT’s management and shift schedule.) A single manager often
covered much of the night shift, when traffic was low. Managers were assisted by both part- and full-
time clerks, the number of which varied from store to store and within each store according to
customer traffic. An average store employed 7.2 full-time employees and 8 part-time clerks. The
security systems at QuikTrip stores were state-of-the-art and generally considered on par with those
of most banks.

Store managers reported to area supervisors, each responsible for 13 to 16 stores. Area supervisors
visited stores weekly to walk the sales floor and to meet with the manager to review financials,
inventory, employee management, and sales information such as gallons of gas sold and cash
imbalances. Area supervisors in turn reported to their division manager, the highest regional
executive. In evaluating store performance, QT paid close attention to customer service and
controllable expenses—wages, inventory shrink, and spoilage. Sales were certainly measured but
were considered less important in employee evaluations because corporate decided what products to
sell and how to promote, arrange, and sell them and therefore did not want to hold store employees
accountable on these points.

QT measured inventory shrink and cash imbalance frequently. Auditors took a full inventory at
each store every 90 days and an inventory of major items every 45 days. In 2010, inventory shrink in
convenience stores and natural and specialty food stores in the U.S. was 1.52%,21 while at QT it was
0.6%. A manager beginning a shift performed a cash audit before taking over. If there was an
unexplained difference of more than 0.3% of sales or more than $100—whichever was smaller—the
previous shift’s manager was documented. For discrepancies greater than $100, the manager would
be reprimanded; for $300, he or she would receive a written warning; $500 would trigger automatic
termination. Three cameras were trained on the registers; store and division managers could compare
the video with register transactions.

However, even inventory took a secondary role to customer service. “I don’t want a manager
more worried about spoilage than taking care of the child who spilled their drink,” said Jeffers. “I’d
rather they take care of that child, give them a free drink, and make a positive impression on our
customer. We drive people to take care of the customer first, not inventory or spoilage.”

Managing Store Employees

Working at a QT store was not for everyone. Employees were expected to perform their tasks
accurately and in the allotted time. Jeffers explained: “The pace of work is too hard for some people
and they exit quick. And the morale of the team really runs them off. I mean the peer pressure. If
you don’t do your part in the store team on that shift, it’s putting a burden on everybody else and
they’re going to be patient with you during the learning process. But when you get to the
disillusioned learner stage, they’re the ones that typically, before we even get involved from the
management level to have to terminate someone, this person’s already feeling the pressure from the
fellow teammates, and they’re pushing them out. Turnover for employees with over a year of service
is virtually nonexistent.”

Employees who stayed with QT saw it as a career. Atlanta-area store manager Jay Fuston, for
example, came to QT thinking it would be a temporary job. “I’ve been here for nine years now,” he

QuikTrip 611-045
9

says, “and they’ve turned it into a career because of how well the company treats us and because of
the opportunities within the company. QT is devoted to its employees.” Others felt the same way.
Alverson said, “QuikTrip takes care of its people. This is my career.” Paterson, another Atlanta store
manager, declared, “I’ll never work for anyone else, ever.”

The average tenure was fourteen years for store managers, nine years for first assistants, six years
for second assistants, four years for relief assistants, three years for night assistants, and two years for
part-timers. Full-time employee turnover at QT was 13%, compared to 59% in the top quartile of the
industry and 109% in the industry overall. Part-time employee turnover for QT was 36%, compared
to 84% in the top quartile of the industry and 157% in the industry overallb.

QT had been named one of Fortune’s “100 Best Companies to Work For” each year since 2003.

QT was unusual among retailers in that it invested in developing its employees because it expected
them to lead QT.

Hiring

The entry-level positions at QT were part-time and full-time clerk, night assistant, and relief
assistant. All other store positions were filled by people who had moved up through the ranks from
an entry-level position. QT invested in a rigorous hiring and training process to ensure that the firm
brought on only those who would deliver the high-quality customer service it expected. Hiring was
done centrally by the division office; store managers had no role in interviewing and selecting entry-
level candidates.

In the Atlanta region alone, QT received 1,200 applications a week for part-time work and 500 to
600 for full-time positions. Applications spiked in the summer; the Atlanta division received a record
high of 2,200 part-time applications per week in the summer of 2010. Mark Milburn, QT’s personnel
manager for the Atlanta division, noted that 90% of all applicants were eliminated before reaching an
interview; QT ended up interviewing five people for each position.

To make it more likely that the right type of person applied in the first place, QT studied
predictors of high performance among its employees, such as level of education, retail experience,
and military service. Finding that 40% of its best employees were referrals from other employees, QT
increased its referral bonus; an employee received a $100 bonus each time a referral reached a
milestone—finishing training and making it through three months, six months, and one year of
employment—for a potential bonus of $400.

When a candidate was invited for an interview, he or she first had to pass a 15- to 20-question
math test, ranging from mentally calculating a customer’s change to determining how much of a
certain product to order from the distribution center for the following week based on the previous
week’s sales. A candidate who passed would then read some literature and watch a video about the
work that would be expected of him or her—including the most demanding and unsavory elements
of the job, such as cleaning the toilets and fueling stations. This was an opportunity for some
candidates to take themselves out of the running.

Then came the actual interview, which lasted 20 to 30 minutes. “We’re looking for energy and
enthusiasm,” said Milburn. “I’ll increase my pace while walking to see if you keep up. Are you
talking? Are you making eye contact and smiling? Are you giving sincere answers?” Interviewers
asked about previous retail experience and also posed hypothetical questions about hypothetical

b These turnover statistics do not include departure of employees during training.

611-045 QuikTrip

work situations. Milburn offered an example: “Say you are working the night shift alone. What
would you do if a customer came in and said that he had spilled gas while pumping?”

For part-time candidates, QT asked if they would be able to live on reduced hours during slow
seasons. QT had a natural advantage, given that many of its part-timers were students looking for 40-
hour weeks in the summer and reduced hours in the winter. However, part-timers were often able to
pick up as many extra hours as they wanted in other local QTs when employees went on vacation or
called in sick.

Training

Once hired, part-timers received 40 hours of training and full-timers approximately two full
weeks. For part-timers, the 40 hours consisted of a six-hour training session at the division office and
34 hours of in-store training from training clerks—full-time employees specifically selected for their
knowledge, experience, enthusiasm, and promotion potential. (See Exhibit 9 for a quiz a training
clerk prepared for her trainees.) Full-time clerks and entry-level managers were trained by initial
trainers—employees whose sole job was to train new employees and who received bonuses based on
the retention of their trainees. For full-time employees, the first week focused on upkeeps and register
training, the second week on their assigned tasks.

QT practiced just-in-time training, giving only enough information for an employee to do his or
her immediate job. “We don’t train an employee to do or know something if they are not going to
apply the knowledge,” Jeffers explained. Training was difficult, with graduation rates of 72% for
part-timers and 82% for full-timers and assistants. Many quit once they realized what would be
expected of them.

When a night or relief assistant was promoted to second or first assistant, the store manager
trained and worked with him or her over two to five shifts. When a first assistant was promoted to
store manager, QT flew him or her to Tulsa to spend one week at the corporate office for intensive
training. A new manager also received six weeks of additional training from a training manager (a
promoted store manager whose only job was to train new managers), who spent two to three weeks
full time in-store with the new manager and then a few days a week afterwards. Ten percent of new
store managers did not make it through training and returned to assistant manager positions—but
often with increased pay.

Compensation and Benefits

Assistant and store managers were salaried, while clerks—whether full-time or part-time—were
paid hourly. Store employees were paid almost double the industry average. Within the company,
store managers were among the top 10% in terms of salary, making between $60,000 and $80,000 a
year with bonuses. Half of the typical bonus—about 10% of wages on average—came from mystery
shopper reviews of customer service. The other half came from operating profit; most store
employees, except part-timers, received a percentage of the store’s and division’s operating profit—
excluding profit on gas—and a percentage of the companywide operating profit from gas sales. The
operating profit bonus averaged approximately 10% of total employee salary.

QT offered other tangible benefits (see Exhibit 10 for employee benefits) as well as such intangible
benefits as job stability and a deep commitment to employee appreciation, development, and well-
being. Employees who reached important milestones were rewarded with bonuses and personal
recognition. After five years of service, an employee was taken out to dinner with the senior-level
division staff. At ten years, Chet would come to town to have dinner with the employee and his or

QuikTrip 611-045
11

her spouse or guest. Chet also spent roughly 50 days per year on the road visiting approximately 275
stores, where he would hold employee meetings. Employees were encouraged to speak to Chet or e-
mail him with suggestions or questions and a good part of the CEO’s workday was spent responding
to these communications. Chet saw his relationship with employees as essential: “My family has
done well because of their hard work. I want to make sure they’re taken care of and know they are
appreciated. I don’t know how I’d do that sitting in an office in Tulsa.” He continued, “They
wouldn’t follow me if they didn’t know that I respect them. It would be disrespectful to not come and
be in front of them at least once a year.”

Job stability was another frequently cited benefit; QT had never laid off an employee. “One of the
reasons our employees come to us and plan to stay with us is because they or their family have lived
through the layoff process elsewhere and they want to go somewhere where they feel secure,” Jeffers
noted.

Job Design and Support

Each store manager and assistant had his or her own responsibilities (such as ordering products
and scheduling employees), but all employees were trained to perform all upkeeps and some tasks.
(See Exhibit 11 for a sample of tasks a part-time clerk might be expected to do in a typical day.) Store
managers and assistants spent approximately 70% of their time at the register, but also helped with
upkeeps and other tasks. Jeffers noted, “The number-one reason people stay with QuikTrip is not the
money. It’s because their managers will do the same jobs they do. They have never worked anywhere
else where the management will do the worst parts of the job such as clean the bathroom, empty the
trash, work in the freezers, and clean the gas islands.” Employee surveys found that employees (a)
were primarily motivated by pride in a job well done and (b) saw the continuous feedback they
received as evidence that the company cared about their personal development.

To ensure that employees had sufficient time and resources to do all their jobs and do them well,
QT made sure that stores were staffed properly and that all equipment functioned well. When
regular employees were sick, had emergencies, or took vacations, relief employees filled in. In 2010,
QT had over 150 relief employees just in the Atlanta market. In addition, part-time employees who
wanted more hours could fill in when a store needed help. To ensure that all equipment was in
working order, QuikTrip had its own facility support for machines and gas pumps. If there was a
problem—for example, if the coffee machine was not brewing properly—store employees submitted
an electronic request and a deadline for when they needed the equipment to be fixed. A technician
assigned to that store (each technician served about five stores) would fix the problem.

Employees were expected to help manage themselves and to work without substantial
micromanagement. “We have to trust people to do the right thing at the right time because we can’t
afford to have immediate supervision on each employee on every shift,” Chet explained, “We can’t
do that and functionally work. Our people feel empowered by that. They like that accountability.”

Internal Promotion

Internal advancement was a major driver of employee performance and QT worked hard to
develop its employees. Store managers worked with their area supervisors to develop a promotion
list of qualified workers. When a store position became available, the store manager would travel to
the division office to interview candidates from the promotion list and decide whom to hire.
Promotion could be within a store with more responsibility (for example, from second assistant to
first assistant) or to a new store that had higher customer traffic and sales and therefore the
opportunity for a larger operating-profit bonus.

611-045 QuikTrip

In established markets, it was not uncommon to find stores whose managers had been in that
position for 15 or 20 years and whose first assistants had been in that position close to 10 years. QT
found that these were some of their best-performing stores because they were run by proven
managers who personally knew most of their customers. Turnover for these positions was low
because store managers and first assistants received high pay, weekends off, and longevity-based
bonuses and perks. However, such stability also created a pool of experienced employees who could
become frustrated by the lack of advancement opportunities. Frustration could be especially high for
relief and night assistants, who spent several nights a week in the store alone. One solution was to
transfer qualified employees from saturated markets to growing ones.

Once an employee became a store manager, promotions became more difficult. The specialist
positions in each division—training manager, division personnel manager, area supervisors, and
division manager—were limited and rarely became available. Although QT filled almost all senior
executive positions (including the president/CEO, the chief operations officer, the chief financial
officer, the vice presidents of sales, marketing, operations, and store development, the director of
construction, and the senior network analyst) with former entry-level store employees, the firm kept
its top corporate management lean, so advancement opportunities were rare.

Performance Reviews

Employees received frequent feedback, most commonly through anonymous electronic
evaluations by their coworkers. QT did “360-degree” evaluations in which employees were evaluated
by those directly above and below them to ensure fair and accurate evaluations. Store managers were
evaluated semi-annually while assistants were evaluated quarterly or twice yearly, depending on
their length of service. Full-time clerks were evaluated monthly and part-time clerks bimonthly. Store
managers met monthly with each employee separately and with the entire team to go over individual
and store performance, team morale, and how to help each other succeed.

Evaluations filtered up though each management level in the division and were centrally
evaluated at the corporate office to rank store and division performance. Employees could log on to
the store’s internal network to see how well their stores were performing against others stores, both
in the division and companywide, in terms of financials, store evaluations, and customer service
feedback and reviews. They could see whether their own individual ranking—based on evaluations,
store performance, and supervisor comments—was in the highest-performing 20%, the middle 60%,
or the bottom 20%. Apart from formal reviews, employees consistently gave one another feedback.

“If someone’s performance slips, the first thing we do is to have a conversation to see how we can
help. We help through our employee assistance program and if they need time off, that’s fine,”
Thornton explained. “But if the employee is not having problems and their performance continues to
slip, then we get serious.” QT did terminate employees, but the cause was more often the employee’s
behavior than his or her lack of skill. Employees could be helped or trained to hone skills, but poor
behavior and customer service were easy ways to be let go from QT. Thornton summed it up: “One
thing about QuikTrip is, if you don’t do right by people, you get weeded out pretty quickly.”

Growth

For a number of years, QT had been devoting its resources to developing its Dallas/Fort Worth-
area and Phoenix-area markets. But the Phoenix market had now been profitable for a number of
years and the Dallas market had reached profitability in 2009. Dallas then had an unprofitable year in
2010, due to exceptionally low gas margins, but Chet was not worried, as merchandise sales volume

QuikTrip 611-045

had increased dramatically since 2010 and the average store there was now making only slightly less
than stores in established markets. Reaching such a healthy sales volume in Dallas in ten years was
particularly pleasing, given that Dallas was the corporate headquarters of the world’s largest
convenience store chain—7 Eleven. With both of these markets reaching maturity, QT was looking to
new growth markets.

QT had been eyeing a move into North Carolina for several reasons. North Carolina had a fast-
growing economy and an expanding population. Construction and real estate costs had fallen in the
several years prior to 2011 and QT saw this as an optimal time to establish a foothold in the region.
QT’s established Atlanta division, with a QT distribution center and QT Kitchen facilities, was only
three hours to the south. In addition, Atlanta was a saturated market with a slow pace of roll-outs
and many of its more than 1,000 employees were experienced and eager for development
opportunities, which Chet was anxious to provide. There had been previous rounds of expansion in
Dallas, Phoenix, and Tucson, but while QT employees were generally willing to relocate for career
advancement, these cities had been too far away to expect Atlanta employees to relocate. “These
people need a chance,” Chet believed. “They came to work for us because they trusted that my family
and QT would take care of them. If we don’t, they’ll go somewhere else.”

Upon entering a new market, QT filled at least 50% of the new positions with employees from
other regions, allowing it to import its culture and values while providing a venue for talented
employees to advance. In these markets, it was possible for assistant managers to become store
managers in only three to four years. But as a market matured and the pace of store openings
declined, so did the percentage of employees brought in from other regions, particularly as local
employees hired in the first years of operation gained experience and looked for promotions.

Traditionally, QT opened approximately one store a month when entering a new market.
Experience and market research had shown that it took up to five years or about 50 stores to establish
a brand presence in a new market and stand out in consumers’ minds. “Until customers come into
our stores a number of times and we’re everywhere in the market, they won’t view us as more than
the average convenience store,” Chet explained.

Turning a profit took even longer. New stores in existing markets broke even 1.5 years after
opening and reached peak performance in 8 to 12 years. Stores in new markets often took seven
years to break even. In every new market QT entered, it lost millions of dollars per month for the first
several years. And QT stores cost more to build—an average of $4.2 million—than those of its
competitors. Since all new stores in North Carolina would be Gen3, they were expected to cost even
more. Also, Chet estimated it cost about $40,000 to move an employee to a new market. “Let’s face it,
our model is a high-investment and high-volume one,” Chet explained. “So in North Carolina, just
like the rest of our markets, we’re going to have really high costs relative to our competitors.
Unfortunately, it takes a while in new markets for our volumes to rise to the level that it takes to
justify those costs. As a result, you have to be patient. The question is always: How much patience
is too much patience?”

2011 North Carolina Roll-Out

As Chet left the meeting in Atlanta and boarded his return flight to Tulsa, his mind was racing.
QT would definitely move into North Carolina, but how quickly should he roll out the new stores
there? QT invested heavily in developing its people, but if he was unable to keep offering them
chances for promotion, his company might begin losing its key asset. At the same time, if the roll-out

611-045 QuikTrip

went too quickly, QT might not be able to find the talent it needed quickly enough to keep up with
store construction.

Opening 10 stores per year in a new market was the proven formula that had helped QT develop
a loyal customer base while maintaining sustainable growth. But with so few promotion
opportunities for QT employees, would it make sense to open stores in North Carolina more quickly?
Opening 20 stores would relieve some of that pressure, but was this the best way to develop his
people and the QT brand? Would speeding up the old model decrease the time it took for new stores
to break even by getting to market saturation sooner?

QuikTrip 611-045
15

Exhibit 1 QuikTrip’s Major Milestones

Date Event

1958 QuikTrip’s first store opened in Tulsa, Oklahoma.

1968 10th anniversary. QuikTrip operated 43 stores and employed 168 people (125 full- and

43 part-time).

1971 QuikTrip began selling gasoline.

1977 20th anniversary. QuikTrip operated 184 stores and employed 966 people (690 full- and

276 part-time).

1984 Chester Cadieux’s infamous human relations memo.

1987 30th anniversary. QuikTrip operated 248 stores and employed 1,798 people (1,054 full-

and 744 part-time).

1995 QuikTrip began its companywide policy and procedure reengineering effort.

1997 40th anniversary. QuikTrip operated 331 stores and employed 3,749 people (2,353 full-

and 1,396 part-time).

2002 Chester Cadieux retired as president and CEO, succeeded by his son Chet Cadieux.

2003 QuikTrip first listed on Forbes’s “100 Best Companies to Work For.”

2004 QuikTrip opened its 400th store.

2007 On the eve of its 50th anniversary, QuikTrip operated 475 stores and employed 7610

people (4,004 of them were part-time). Also in 2007, QuikTrip opened its first QuikTrip
Kitchen.

2008 QuikTrip celebrated opening its 500th store.

2011 QuikTrip entered North Carolina.

Sources: Chester Cadieux, From Lucky to Smart: Leadership Lessons from QuikTrip (Tulsa, OK: Mullerhaus, 2008), p. 65; casewriter
research.

611-045

Exhibit 2

Source: Qu

Market

Tulsa, Okla

Kansas Cit
Missouri
Wichita, Ka
Des Moine
Omaha, Ne
St. Louis, M

Springfield
Atlanta, Ge
Dallas-Fort
Texas
Phoenix, A
Tucson, Ar

Sources: Che
“St
and

QuikTrip M

uikTrip, “QuikTri

ahoma S

ty, O

ansas J
es, Iowa S
ebraska J
Missouri S

, Missouri S
eorgia S
t Worth, D

Arizona A
rizona J

ester Cadieux, F
tore Wages, Tucs
d field interviews

Markets as of

ip Store Locator,

Date of Entry
Chronologic

September 25,

October 1, 1968

July 30, 1971
September 22,
June 6, 1986
September 20,

September 20,
September 21,
December 3, 19

April 20, 2000
January 14, 20

rom Lucky to Sma
son Division,” htt
s.

January 2011

” http://www.q

(Listed
cally)

Num

1958 59 (p
Bart

8 73

38
1974 22

11
1986 74 (p

Colu
1986 5
1986 1

999 76

79 (i
10 (see

art: Leadership Les
tp://www.quikt

1, Dates of En

quiktrip.com/sto

mber of Stores
January 2011

plus two stores
lesville, OK)

plus one store
umbia, MO)

including Tucso
e above)

ssons from

QuikT

trip.com/IS/wag

ntry, and New

orelocator/Defau

s (As of
1)

New
Ope

in 2

1
1
0

in 2

0
5
8

on) 6
5

Trip (Tulsa, OK: M
ges_detail.asp?L

w Store Openi

ult.aspx, accessed

w Store
enings in
2011

Mullerhaus, 2008
Loc=Tucson, acce

QuikTr

ngs in 2011

d January 2011.

8), p. 49; QuikTri
essed January 201

rip

ip,
11

QuikTrip 611-045

Exhibit 3 Chester Cadieux’s 1984 Human Relations Memo

TO: All Management Personnel
DATE: February 27, 1984
RE: Practicing the Golden Rule

QuikTrip customers expect and deserve well-groomed employees who give them fast, friendly service.
They also expect and deserve attractive, clean and well-merchandised stores. Just as there are minimum
standards for customer service, appearance and store operation, there are minimum acceptable standards
in the management of our employees. QuikTrip employees expect and deserve intelligent, positive, factual
supervision. They do not deserve to work for an asshole. I am more tolerant of poor operation than I am of
poor treatment of employees.

I am writing this memo not as a threat or because I perceive we have a problem, but as the result of a
discussion held in one of our Management Committee meetings. Everybody seemed to understand what
the minimum standards of customer service, employee appearance, and operation were, but there was no
clear definition of minimum acceptable human relations skills. Some failed to realize that the way we get
good results is just as important as the results.

Because of different personalities and experiences, we handle employees differently and I would not try to
teach one set method. I would just say we cannot tolerate obnoxious, oppressive, abusive, tyrannical
despots (assholes).*

Please be sure that you always treat your employees the way you want to be treated. That is the minimum
expected standard of management at Q

uikTrip.

CC:db

* Obnoxious—highly offensive
Oppressive—unreasonably severe; depressing to the spirit
Abusive—characterized by verbal abuse
Tyrant—a ruler who exercises absolute power oppressively or brutally
Despot—a person exercising power abusively, oppressively, or tyrannically
Asshole—an easily understood American vulgarity for all the above

Source: Chester Cadieux, From Lucky to Smart: Leadership Lessons from QuikTrip (Tulsa, OK: Mullerhaus, 2008), p.87.

Exhibit 4a QuikTrip’s Purpose

Provide an opportunity for employees to grow and succeed.

Companywide: Expand into new markets, promote from within, encourage upward mobility of
division personnel, fund education opportunities

Division Staff: Provide training and performance feedback, promise only what can be delivered

Store Managers: Provide training and performance feedback, encourage promotion to higher volume
stores, create a teamwork environment, promise only what can be delivered

Store Team and Individuals: Provide training and regular, honest feedback, develop skills, provide
promotion opportunities, facilitate learning new tasks

Source: Chester Cadieux, From Lucky to Smart: Leadership Lessons from QuikTrip (Tulsa, OK: Mullerhaus, 2008), p.149.

611-045 QuikTrip
18

Exhibit 4b QuikTrip’s Core Values

Be the Best:
 Strive for excellence in customer service
 Hire only the best we see
 Promote the best based on proven performance
 Insist on high operating and management standards
 Stay aware of our competition
 Be the employer of choice in our industry
 Achieve quality in performance
 Work with team to constantly improve

Never Be Satisfied:

 Facilitate resource groups and annual meetings
 Constantly improve process
 Remodel stores to meet the needs of customers and store team
 Close or relocate stores that don’t meet criteria
 Don’t let success go to our heads
 Identify areas for improvement and work to correct them
 Benchmark against the best in our industry and business in general
 Encourage continuous self-improvement

Focus Long-Term:

 Invest in the training and development of people
 Focus on operating stores as the primary thing we do
 Develop today’s leaders and future leaders
 Maintain quality while growing the number of stores
 Drive sales at expense of margin
 Invest in new markets
 Set and accomplish challenging strategic goals

Do What’s Right for QuikTrip:

 Support critical QT strategies with resources
 Terminate those who won’t or can’t perform to standards
 Remain privately owned
 Insist on right person–right job
 Conserve resources

Do the Right Thing

 Consider how our actions will affect customers, the store, and the community
 Ensure we have the best store security systems
 Consider stores first, then corporate plans
 Sell all products responsibly
 Support our communities through contributions and partnerships
 Guarantee everything we sell
 Manage people well—be fair, firm and consistent

Source: Chester Cadieux, From Lucky to Smart: Leadership Lessons from QuikTrip (Tulsa, OK: Mullerhaus, 2008), p.150-153.

QuikT

Exhib

QuikT
QuikT

rip

bit 5 QuikTr

Trip Gen2 (Ex

rip Store Ima

xisting Stores)

ges

) I

nterior

) Exterior

611-045
19

611-045

Exhibit 5

QuikTrip

Source: Qu

(continued)

Gen3 Store In

uikTrip.

nterior

QuikTrrip

QuikTrip 611-045

Exhibit 6 QuikTrip’s Gasoline Market Penetration

Customer Gasoline Market Penetration in 2006*
QuikTrip Best Competitor

Most Used Also Used Total Most Used Also Used Total
Tulsa 74.3% 12.3% 86.6% 6.7% 8.3% 15.0%
Kansas City 46.7% 21.3% 68.0% 13.0% 13.3% 26.3%
Wichita 42.7% 29.7% 72.4% 28.7% 18.7% 47.4%
Des Moines 37.0% 19.0% 56.0% 15.0% 21.0% 36.0%
Phoenix 21.2% 16.9% 38.1% 13.2% 13.2% 26.4%
St. Louis 40.5% 25.2% 65.7% 15.9% 13.3% 29.2%
Atlanta 34.4% 25.5% 59.9% 16.2% 25.2% 41.4%

Dallas-Fort Worth 16.3% 15.0% 31.3% 11.3% 20.0% 31.3%

* 2006 was the last time that QT tracked this information because it was highly correlated with
market share data. In 2006, QT had been in Dallas-Fort Worth and Phoenix for six years.

Gasoline
Market Share 2011**

QT Best Competitor
Tulsa 56.2% 11.9%
Kansas City 36.2% 18.6%
Wichita 38.0% 18.9%
Des Moines 21.7% 25.5%
Phoenix 19.0% 24.6%
St. Louis 21.0% 23.7%
Atlanta 26.3% 12.1%
Dallas-Fort Worth 12.3% 14.8%

** On average, the best competitor had four times as many locations as QT.

Source: QuikTrip.

611-045 QuikTrip
22

Exhibit 7 Mystery Shopper Store Evaluation Criteria

Customer Service—friendly greeting, eye contact, correct prices charged, efficient/
courteous/professional behavior, 3 to 1 standard applied, proper thank you and/or request to return.

Employee Appearance—visible name tag, proper uniform, neat appearance, no use of cell
phones.

Cleanliness—restroom, floors, trash containers, front doors, checkstand, pastry case, parking lot,
gasoline island, sidewalk, fountain drink/coffee/hot food modules, coolers.

Merchandise—outside displays, candy rack, coolers, hot food products, fountain
drink/coffee/hot food modules, general merchandise.

Source: Chester Cadieux, From Lucky to Smart: Leadership Lessons from QuikTrip (Tulsa, OK: Mullerhaus, 2008), p.107.

Exhibit 8 Management Schedule for QuikTrip’s Stores

SHIFT Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday Saturday Sunday

Morning MGR/1A MGR/1A MGR MGR/2A MGR/2A RA RA
Evening 2A RA 1A 1A 1A 2A 2A
Night NA RA RA NA NA NA NA

Management Key:

MGR – Store Manager
1A – First Assistant
2A – Second Assistant
RA – Relief Assistant
NA – Night Assistant

Shift Key:

Morning – 6 a.m. to 3:30 p.m.
Evening – 2 p.m. to 12:00 a.m.
Night – 11 p.m. to 8 a.m. (Friday and Saturday 10:30 p.m. to 8 a.m.)

Sources: Casewriter research; QuikTrip, “Work Schedules,” http://www.quiktrip.com/jobs/schedules.asp, accessed January
2011.

QuikTrip 611-045

Exhibit 9 “Part-Time Clerk Trainee Quiz” prepared and used by a trainer clerk in the Atlanta
division

1- After clocking in, one should always do ______________________ unless told otherwise.

2- What comes first: tasks, customers, or upkeeps?

3- What is the maximum time given for an upkeep?

4- How often should an upkeep be done?

5- True or false: When doing an upkeep, we sweep and mop the entire sales floor.

6- True or false: When touching food, we do not use gloves.

7- True or false: Work schedules change weekly.

8- True or false: We chase and throw soda cans at gas drive-offs.

9- What kind of coupons does QT accept?

10- Does QT allow second-hand sale?

11- What is the minimum age to buy alcohol?

12- What is the minimum age to buy tobacco/cigarettes?

13- QT requires its employees to ID anyone who looks under what age?

14- What key on the lottery machine is not to be used?

15- Does QT allow its employees to text/talk on a cell phone while on duty?

16- Does QT accept travelers checks over $100?

17- Is alcohol allowed to be bought with an EBT card?

18- Are smiles part of your uniform?

19- How much money do you get if you hit all of your customer contacts during a mystery shop?

20- Where do you see yourself with QT in the next year?

21- Money orders come in increments of ________.

22- _________ is the maximum amount allowed to be purchased by a customer daily.

23- How much does one 300 dollar money order cost?

24- A money order can be purchased with what form of payment?

25- True or false: Lottery tickets must be paid in cash.

If you score 100%, you will receive a free regular size candy bar or a free donut from your
awesome clerk trainer 

Source: Casewriter interview with a QuikTrip training clerk.

611-045 QuikTrip

Exhibit 10 Summary of QuikTrip Employee Benefits

Insurance Benefits (Full-Time Employees)

 Health: Choose from the QuikTrip self administered plan with a Preferred Provider
Organization (PPO) or an HMO (except in Iowa). QuikTrip contributes approximately 80%
of the total cost of the plan.

 Dental: Two free cleanings per year. Annual deductible and $1,250 annual calendar year maximum per covered
individual.

 Life: Coverage at twice the previous year’s earnings. Supplemental term and whole life plans also available.
 Vision: Covers eye examinations and glasses or contact lenses.
 Part-Time Employees are eligible for insurance coverage through StarBridge after 30 days of employment. At their

second anniversary, they may enroll in the standard QuikTrip Benefits Plan.

Financial Benefits

 401(k): Annual maximum amount of $16,500 from each employee’s compensation can be invested in QuikTrip’s
401(k) plan. QuikTrip matches the employee’s contribution at a 50% rate for up to 6% of their annual pay.

 Profit Sharing: QuikTrip annually contributes a percentage of

pretax profit.

 Employee Stock Option Plan (ESOP): QuikTrip annually contributes company stock equivalent to a percentage of

pretax profit.

Vacation Benefits

 2 weeks after 1 year of full-time employment
 3 weeks after 5 years of full-time employment
 4 weeks after 10 years of full-time employment
 5 weeks after 15 years (store employees only) of employment
 Part-time employees accrue vacation after 2 years of employment
 1 month paid sabbatical at 25 years and every 5 years thereafter

Other Job Benefits For Both Full and Part Time

 Free fountain drinks/coffee while on duty
 Weekly pay through direct deposit or payroll card and free checking with minimum balance
 Christmas bonus
 Credit union
 Seniority awards
 Tuition reimbursement
 Employee assistance program
 Free stylish shirts for store employees

Additional Benefits For Full Time

 Disability, Sick pay
 Medical reimbursement accounts, child care reimbursement accounts
 Scholarship program

Source: QuikTrip, “Benefits,” http://www.quiktrip.com/jobs/benefits.asp, accessed on February 12, 2011.

QuikTrip 611-045

Exhibit 11 Employee Duties

 Give fast, friendly customer service
 Brew coffee, clean fountain area
 Write orders
 Read daily store email
 Sweep the parking lot
 Give fast, friendly customer service
 Wipe down gas pumps
 Check in vendors
 Restock cooler and freezer
 Sweep and mop floor
 Stock hot dog and taquito roller grills
 Put up warehouse order
 Give fast, friendly customer service
 Clean and stock fountain drink module
 Clean restrooms
 Attend store team and 1-on-1 meetings
 Bag ice
 Cook Hotzi breakfast/lunch sandwiches
 Empty trash containers
 Move and build pop display
 Give fast, friendly customer service
 Check in gas delivery
 Pick up outside trash
 Give fast, friendly customer service
 Clean sidewalk and parking lot

Source: QuikTrip, “Duties,” http://www.quiktrip.com/jobs/duties.asp, accessed January 2011.

611-045 QuikTrip

Endnotes

1 NACS, The Association for Convenience and Fuel Retailing, “U.S. Convenience Store Count,”
January 24, 2011, http://www.nacsonline.com/NACS/NEWS/FACTSHEETS/SCOPEOFINDUSTRY/Pages/
IndustryStoreCount.aspx, accessed June 2011.

2 Ibid.

3 NACS, The Association for Convenience and Fuel Retailing, “Motor Fuel Sales,” January 24, 2011,
http://www.nacsonline.com/NACS/News/FactSheets/Motor%20Fuels/Pages/MotorFuelSales.aspx, accessed
January 2011.

4 NACS, The Association for Convenience and Fuel Retailing, “Convenience Stores Offer More
Convenience,” May 7, 2009, http://www.nacsonline.com/NACS/
News/FactSheets/ScopeofIndustry/Pages/Convenience.aspx, accessed January 2011.

5 NACS, The Association for Convenience and Fuel Retailing, “Technology,” July 1, 2006,
http://www.nacsonline.com/NACS/News/FactSheets/MerchandiseandServices/Pages/Technology.aspx,
accessed June 2011.

6 NACS, The Association for Convenience and Fuel Retailing, “Convenience Stores Offer More
Convenience,” May 7, 2009, http://www.nacsonline.com/NACS/
News/FactSheets/ScopeofIndustry/Pages/Convenience.aspx, accessed June 2011.

7 Ibid.

8 7 Eleven, “Real Estate,” http://corp.7-eleven.com/RealEstate/tabid/180/Default.aspx, accessed January
2011.

9 Sheetz, “The History of Sheetz,” http://www.sheetz.com/main/about/history.cfm, accessed January 2011.

10 NACS, The Association for Convenience and Fuel Retailing, “Convenience Stores Offer More
Convenience,” May 7, 2009, http://www.nacsonline.com/NACS/
News/FactSheets/ScopeofIndustry/Pages/Convenience.aspx, accessed January 2011.

11 Chester Cadieux, From Lucky to Smart: Leadership Lessons from QuikTrip (Tulsa, OK: Mullerhaus, 2008), p.46-
58.

12 Ibid., p.49.

13 Ibid., p.53.

14 Ibid., p.50.

15 Ibid., p.94-103.

16 Michael Pollan, The Omnivore’s Dilemma (New York, NT; Penguin Books, 2006), p. 110.

17 Forbes.com, LLC, “America’s Largest Private Companies of 2010,” November 3, 2010,
http://www.forbes.com/lists/2010/21/private-companies-10_land.html, accessed January 2011.

18 Cadieux, From Lucky to Smart, p.86.

19 Ibid., p.75.

20 Ibid., p.105.

21 Checkpoint “The Global Retail Theft Barometer 2010. The Worldwide Shrinkage Survey.

22 QuikTrip, “We Have a Lot of Quality in Store for You,” http://www.quiktrip.com/aboutqt/aboutqt.asp,
accessed January 2011.

<< /ASCII85EncodePages false /AllowTransparency false /AutoPositionEPSFiles true /AutoRotatePages /None /Binding /Left /CalGrayProfile (Gray Gamma 2.2) /CalRGBProfile (sRGB IEC61966-2.1) /CalCMYKProfile (U.S. Web Coated \050SWOP\051 v2) /sRGBProfile (sRGB IEC61966-2.1) /CannotEmbedFontPolicy /Error /CompatibilityLevel 1.4 /CompressObjects /Off /CompressPages true /ConvertImagesToIndexed true /PassThroughJPEGImages true /CreateJobTicket false /DefaultRenderingIntent /Default /DetectBlends true /DetectCurves 0.0000 /ColorConversionStrategy /LeaveColorUnchanged /DoThumbnails true /EmbedAllFonts true /EmbedOpenType false /ParseICCProfilesInComments true /EmbedJobOptions true /DSCReportingLevel 0 /EmitDSCWarnings false /EndPage -1 /ImageMemory 1048576 /LockDistillerParams true /MaxSubsetPct 100 /Optimize true /OPM 1 /ParseDSCComments true /ParseDSCCommentsForDocInfo true /PreserveCopyPage true /PreserveDICMYKValues true /PreserveEPSInfo true /PreserveFlatness true /PreserveHalftoneInfo false /PreserveOPIComments false /PreserveOverprintSettings true /StartPage 1 /SubsetFonts false /TransferFunctionInfo /Preserve /UCRandBGInfo /Remove /UsePrologue false /ColorSettingsFile () /AlwaysEmbed [ true ] /NeverEmbed [ true ] /AntiAliasColorImages false /CropColorImages true /ColorImageMinResolution 150 /ColorImageMinResolutionPolicy /OK /DownsampleColorImages false /ColorImageDownsampleType /Bicubic /ColorImageResolution 150 /ColorImageDepth -1 /ColorImageMinDownsampleDepth 1 /ColorImageDownsampleThreshold 1.50000 /EncodeColorImages false /ColorImageFilter /DCTEncode /AutoFilterColorImages true /ColorImageAutoFilterStrategy /JPEG /ColorACSImageDict << /QFactor 0.76 /HSamples [2 1 1 2] /VSamples [2 1 1 2] >>
/ColorImageDict << /QFactor 0.76 /HSamples [2 1 1 2] /VSamples [2 1 1 2] >>
/JPEG2000ColorACSImageDict << /TileWidth 256 /TileHeight 256 /Quality 15 >>
/JPEG2000ColorImageDict << /TileWidth 256 /TileHeight 256 /Quality 15 >>
/AntiAliasGrayImages false
/CropGrayImages true
/GrayImageMinResolution 150
/GrayImageMinResolutionPolicy /OK
/DownsampleGrayImages false
/GrayImageDownsampleType /Bicubic
/GrayImageResolution 150
/GrayImageDepth -1
/GrayImageMinDownsampleDepth 2
/GrayImageDownsampleThreshold 1.50000
/EncodeGrayImages false
/GrayImageFilter /DCTEncode
/AutoFilterGrayImages true
/GrayImageAutoFilterStrategy /JPEG
/GrayACSImageDict << /QFactor 0.76 /HSamples [2 1 1 2] /VSamples [2 1 1 2] >>
/GrayImageDict << /QFactor 0.76 /HSamples [2 1 1 2] /VSamples [2 1 1 2] >>
/JPEG2000GrayACSImageDict << /TileWidth 256 /TileHeight 256 /Quality 15 >>
/JPEG2000GrayImageDict << /TileWidth 256 /TileHeight 256 /Quality 15 >>
/AntiAliasMonoImages false
/CropMonoImages true
/MonoImageMinResolution 1200
/MonoImageMinResolutionPolicy /OK
/DownsampleMonoImages false
/MonoImageDownsampleType /Bicubic
/MonoImageResolution 1200
/MonoImageDepth -1
/MonoImageDownsampleThreshold 1.50000
/EncodeMonoImages false
/MonoImageFilter /CCITTFaxEncode
/MonoImageDict << /K -1 >>
/AllowPSXObjects false
/CheckCompliance [
/None
]
/PDFX1aCheck false
/PDFX3Check false
/PDFXCompliantPDFOnly false
/PDFXNoTrimBoxError true
/PDFXTrimBoxToMediaBoxOffset [
0.00000
0.00000
0.00000
0.00000
]
/PDFXSetBleedBoxToMediaBox true
/PDFXBleedBoxToTrimBoxOffset [
0.00000
0.00000
0.00000
0.00000
]
/PDFXOutputIntentProfile (None)
/PDFXOutputConditionIdentifier ()
/PDFXOutputCondition ()
/PDFXRegistryName ()
/PDFXTrapped /False
/CreateJDFFile false
/Description << /ARA
/BGR
/CHS
/CHT
/CZE
/DAN
/DEU
/ESP
/ETI
/FRA
/GRE
/HEB
/HRV
/HUN
/ITA (Utilizzare queste impostazioni per creare documenti Adobe PDF adatti per visualizzare e stampare documenti aziendali in modo affidabile. I documenti PDF creati possono essere aperti con Acrobat e Adobe Reader 6.0 e versioni successive.)
/JPN
/KOR
/LTH
/LVI
/NLD (Gebruik deze instellingen om Adobe PDF-documenten te maken waarmee zakelijke documenten betrouwbaar kunnen worden weergegeven en afgedrukt. De gemaakte PDF-documenten kunnen worden geopend met Acrobat en Adobe Reader 6.0 en hoger.)
/NOR
/POL
/PTB
/RUM
/RUS
/SKY
/SLV
/SUO
/SVE
/TUR
/UKR
/ENU (Use these settings to create Adobe PDF documents suitable for reliable viewing and printing of business documents. Created PDF documents can be opened with Acrobat and Adobe Reader 6.0 and later.)
>>
>> setdistillerparams
<< /HWResolution [600 600] /PageSize [612.000 792.000] >> setpagedevice

Turn in your highest-quality paper
Get a qualified writer to help you with

“ Assignment 1 – Quick Trip Case Study ”

Get high-quality paper

NEW! AI matching with writer

Hire a Writer

Client Reviews

4.9

Sitejabber

4.6

Trustpilot

4.8

Our Guarantees

100% Confidentiality

Information about customers is confidential and never disclosed to third parties.

Original Writing

We complete all papers from scratch. You can get a plagiarism report.

Timely Delivery

No missed deadlines – 97% of assignments are completed in time.

Money Back

If you're confident that a writer didn't follow your order details, ask for a refund.

New to Your Trusted Assignment Help Service? Sign up & Save

Calculate the price of your order

Type of paper needed:

Pages:

You will get a personal manager and a discount.

Academic level:

We'll send you the first draft for approval by at

Total price:

$0.00

Power up Your Academic Success with the
Team of Professionals. We’ve Got Your Back.

Power up Your Study Success with Experts We’ve Got Your Back.

Order Now Order Now