Home Uncategorized Pestel Analysis

Uncategorized

Pestel Analysis

Read Chapter 3 and view the required videos on PESTEL Analysis and the Five Forces Framework.

Select one of the cases from Part 2 of the Thompson (2020) textbook to analyze the six components of the Macro-Environment and the Five Forces Model.

For this assignment:

Prepare a brief PESTEL Analysis for your selected case from Part 2 of our Thompson (2020) text. You must address all six elements.
Prepare a brief Five Force Analysis as presented in our Thompson (2020) text for your selected case. Address all five forces.

Your analysis must be driven by facts, research, and data.
Your analysis should be 500 words or less.
Incorporate at least one course (our text) and one non-course scholarly/peer reviewed source in your paper.
Create Level1, 2 and Level 3 APA headings for each portion of the analysis.
All written assignments must include a coverage page, introductory and concluding paragraphs, reference page, double-spaced and proper in-text citations using APA guidelines.

Resources:

http://w3.salemstate.edu/~edesmarais/courses/470general/semesters/Archived%20semesters/Fall%202010/3.%20Evaluating%20a%20Company’s%20External%20Environment

CHAPTER 3 Evaluating a Company’s External Environment

©alice-photo/Shutterstock.com

©McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. Authorized only for instructor use in the classroom. No reproduction or further distribution permitted without the prior written consent of McGraw-Hill Education.

. Permission required for reproduction or display.

Chapter 3 presents the concepts and analytical tools for assessing a company’s external environment. Attention centers on the competitive arena in which a company operates, together with the technological, societal, regulatory, or demographic influences in the macro-environment that are acting to reshape the company’s future market arena.

3–1

Learning Objectives

This Chapter Will Help You Understand:

How to recognize the factors in a company’s broad macro-environment that may have strategic significance.

How to use analytic tools to diagnose the competitive conditions in a company’s industry.

How to map the market positions of key groups of industry rivals.

How to determine whether an industry’s outlook presents a company with sufficiently attractive opportunities for growth and profitability.

This chapter presents the concepts and analytical tools for zeroing in on a single-business company’s external environment.

3–2

FIGURE 3.1 From Analyzing the Company’s Situation to Choosing a Strategy

Chapter 3 External Environment

Chapter 4 Internal Environment

Access the text alternative for these images.
Copyright ©McGraw-Hill Education. Permission required for reproduction or display.

As depicted in Figure 3.1, strategic thinking begins with an appraisal of the company’s external and internal environments (as a basis for deciding on a long-term direction and developing a strategic vision), moves toward an evaluation of the most promising alternative strategies and business models, and culminates in choosing a specific strategy.
© McGraw-Hill Education
3–3

Analyzing the Company’s Macro-Environment
PESTEL Analysis
Focuses on principal components of strategic significance in the macro-environment
Political factors
Economic conditions (local to worldwide)
Sociocultural forces
Technological factors
Environmental factors (the natural environment)
Legal and regulatory conditions

The macro-environment encompasses the broad environmental context in which a company’s industry is situated that includes strategically relevant components over which the firm has no direct control.
Analysis of the impact of these factors is often referred to as PESTEL analysis, an acronym that serves as a reminder of the six components involved (Political, Economic, Sociocultural, Technological, Environmental, Legal/Regulatory).
© McGraw-Hill Education
3–4

FIGURE 3.2 The Components of a Company’s Macro-Environment

Access the text alternative for these images.
Copyright ©McGraw-Hill Education. Permission required for reproduction or display.

Figure 3.2, The Components of a Company’s Macro-environment identifies the arenas within an organization’s macro-environment.
© McGraw-Hill Education
3–5

Assessing the Company’s Industry and Competitive Environment
Thinking strategically about the competitive environment requires managers to use some well validated concepts and analytical tools.
Five forces framework
The value net
Driving forces
Strategic groups
Competitor analysis
Key success factors

Thinking strategically about a company’s industry and competitive environment entails using some well-validated concepts and analytic tools. These include the five forces framework, the value net, driving forces, strategic groups, competitor analysis, and key success factors. Proper use of these analytic tools can provide managers with the understanding needed to craft a strategy that fits the company’s situation within their industry environment. The remainder of this chapter is devoted to describing how managers can use these tools to inform and improve their strategic choices.
© McGraw-Hill Education
3–6

The Five Forces Framework
The five competitive forces
Competition from rival sellers
Competition from potential new entrants
Competition from producers of substitute products
Supplier bargaining power
Customer bargaining power

The character and strength of the competitive forces operating in an industry are never the same from one industry to another. The most powerful and widely used tool for diagnosing the principal competitive pressures in a market is the five forces framework.
© McGraw-Hill Education
3–7

FIGURE 3.3 The Five Forces Model of Competition:
A Key Analytical Tool
Sources: Adapted from M.E. Porter, “How Competitive Forces Shape Strategy,” Harvard Business Review 57, no. 2 (1979), pp.137-145; M.E. Porter, “The Five Competitive Forces That Shape Strategy,” Harvard Business Review 86, no 1 (2008), pp. 80-86.
Access the text alternative for these images.
Copyright ©McGraw-Hill Education. Permission required for reproduction or display.

This five forces framework, depicted in Figure 3.3, holds that competitive pressures on companies within an industry come from five sources. These include (1) competition from rival sellers, (2) competition from competition from producers of substitute products, (3) potential new entrants, (4) supplier bargaining power, and (5) customer bargaining power.
© McGraw-Hill Education
3–8

Using the Five-forces Model of Competition
STEP 1: For each of the five forces, identify the different parties involved, along with the specific factors that bring about competitive pressures.
STEP 2: Evaluate how strong the pressures stemming from each of the five forces are (strong, moderate, or weak).
STEP 3: Determine whether the five forces, overall, are supportive of high industry profitability.

Using the five forces model to determine the nature and strength of competitive pressures in a given industry involves three steps:
∙ Step 1: For each of the five forces, identify the different parties involved, along with the specific factors that bring about competitive pressures.
∙ Step 2: Evaluate how strong the pressures stemming from each of the five forces are (strong, moderate, or weak).
∙ Step 3: Determine whether the five forces, overall, are supportive of high industry profitability.
© McGraw-Hill Education
3–9

Competitive Pressures That Increase Rivalry among Competing Sellers
Buyer demand is growing slowly or declining.
It is becoming less costly for buyers to switch brands.
Industry products are becoming less differentiated.
There is unused production capacity, or products have high fixed costs or high storage costs.
The number of competitors is increasing, or they are becoming more equal in size and competitive strength.
The diversity of competitors is increasing.
High exit barriers keep firms from exiting the industry.

The strongest of the five competitive forces is often the rivalry for buyer patronage among competing sellers of a product or service. The intensity of rivalry among competing sellers within an industry depends on several identifiable factors.
© McGraw-Hill Education
3–10

FIGURE 3.4 Factors Affecting the Strength of Rivalry

Access the text alternative for these images.
Copyright ©McGraw-Hill Education. Permission required for reproduction or display.

Figure 3.4 summarizes these factors affecting rivalry in the industry, identifying those that intensify or weaken rivalry among direct competitors in an industry.
© McGraw-Hill Education
3–11

Competitive Pressures Associated with the Threat of New Entrants
Entry threat considerations
Expected defensive reactions of incumbent firms
Strength of barriers to entry
Attractiveness of a particular market’s growth
in demand and profit potential
Capabilities and resources of potential entrants
Entry of existing competitors into market segments
in which they have no current presence

New entrants into an industry threaten the position of rival firms since they will compete fiercely for market share, add to the number of industry rivals, and add to the industry’s production capacity in the process.
© McGraw-Hill Education
3–12

Market Entry Barriers Facing New Entrants
Sizable economies of scale in production, distribution, advertising, or other activities
Hard-to-replicate learning curve and industry relationship cost advantages of incumbents
Strong brand preferences and high customer loyalty
Patents and other intellectual property protection
Strong “network effects” in customer demand
High capital requirements
Building distributor and/or dealer networks and securing adequate space on retailers’ shelves
Restrictive regulatory and trade policies

The strength of the threat of entry is governed to a large degree by the height of the industry’s entry barriers. High barriers reduce the threat of potential entry, whereas low barriers enable easier entry.
Whether an industry’s entry barriers ought to be considered high or low depends on the resources and capabilities possessed by the pool of potential entrants. High entry barriers and weak entry threats today do not always translate into high entry barriers and weak entry threats tomorrow.

FIGURE 3.5 Factors Affecting the Threat of Entry

Access the text alternative for these images.
Copyright ©McGraw-Hill Education. Permission required for reproduction or display.

Figure 3.5 summarizes the factors that cause the overall competitive pressure from potential entrants to be strong or weak. An analysis of these factors can help managers determine whether the threat of entry into their industry is high or low.
© McGraw-Hill Education
3–14

Competitive Pressures from the Sellers of Substitute Products
Substitute products considerations
Readily available and attractively priced?
Comparable or better in terms of quality, performance, and other relevant attributes?
Offer lower switching costs to buyers?
Indicators of substitutes’ competitive strength
Increasing rate of growth in sales of substitutes
Substitute producers adding new output capacity
Increasing profitability of substitute producers

Companies in one industry are vulnerable to competitive pressure from the actions of companies in a closely adjoining industry whenever buyers view the products of the two industries as good substitutes.
© McGraw-Hill Education
3–15

FIGURE 3.6 Factors Affecting Competition from Substitute Products
Access the text alternative for these images.

Figure 3.6 depicts three factors that determine whether the competitive pressures from substitute products are strong or weak. Competitive pressures are stronger when:
Good substitutes are readily available and attractively priced.
Buyers view the substitutes as comparable or better in terms of quality. performance, and other relevant attributes.
The costs that buyers incur in switching to the substitutes are low.
© McGraw-Hill Education
3–16

Competitive Pressures Stemming from Supplier Bargaining Power
Supplier bargaining power depends on:
Strength of demand for and availability of suppliers’ products.
Whether suppliers provide a differentiated input that enhances the performance of the industry’s product.
Industry members’ costs for switching among suppliers.
Size and number of suppliers relative to industry members.
Possibility of backward integration into suppliers’ industry.
Fraction of the cost of the supplier’s product relative to the total cost of the industry’s product.
Availability of good substitutes for suppliers’ products.
Whether industry members are major customers of suppliers.

Whether the suppliers of industry members represent a weak or strong competitive force depends on the degree to which suppliers have sufficient bargaining power to influence the terms and conditions of supply in their favor. Suppliers with strong bargaining power are a source of competitive pressure because of their ability to charge industry members higher prices, pass costs on to them, and limit their opportunities to find better deals.
© McGraw-Hill Education
3–17

FIGURE 3.7 Factors Affecting the Bargaining Power of Suppliers

Access the text alternative for these images.
Copyright ©McGraw-Hill Education. Permission required for reproduction or display.

Figure 3.7 shows a variety of factors that determine the strength of suppliers’ bargaining power.
© McGraw-Hill Education
3–18

Competitive Pressures Stemming from Buyer Bargaining Power and Price Sensitivity
Buyer bargaining power considerations
Strength of buyers’ demand for sellers’ products
Degree to which industry goods are differentiated
Buyers’ costs for switching to competing sellers or substitutes
Number and size of buyers relative to number of sellers
Threat of buyers’ integration into sellers’ industry
Buyers’ knowledge of products, costs and pricing
Buyers’ discretion in delaying purchases
Buyers’ price sensitivity due to low profits, size of purchase, and consequences of purchase
Product quality not at issue price is primary concern

Whether buyers can exert strong competitive pressures on industry members depends on (1) the degree to which buyers have bargaining power, and (2) the extent to which buyers are price-sensitive. Buyers with strong bargaining power can limit industry profitability by demanding price concessions, better payment terms, or additional features and services that increase industry members’ costs. Buyer price sensitivity limits the profit potential of industry members by restricting the ability of sellers to raise prices without losing revenue due to lost sales.
© McGraw-Hill Education
3–19

FIGURE 3.8 Factors Affecting the Bargaining Power of Buyers

Access the text alternative for these images.
Copyright ©McGraw-Hill Education. Permission required for reproduction or display.

Figure 3.8 summarizes the factors determining the strength of buyer power in an industry. Note that the first five factors are the mirror image of those determining the bargaining power of suppliers.
© McGraw-Hill Education
3–20

Is the Collective Strength of the Five Competitive Forces Conducive to Good Profitability?
Answers to three questions are needed:
Is the state of competition in the industry stronger than normal?
Can industry firms expect to earn decent profits given prevailing competitive forces?
Are some of the competitive forces sufficiently powerful to undermine industry profitability?
Even one powerful competitive force may be enough to make the industry unattractive in terms of its profit potential.

Assessing whether each of the five competitive forces gives rise to strong, moderate, or weak competitive pressures sets the stage for evaluating whether, overall, the strength of the five forces is conducive to good profitability. Are any of the competitive forces sufficiently powerful to undermine industry profitability? Can industry firms reasonably expect to earn decent profits considering the prevailing competitive forces?
The strongest of the five forces determines the extent of the downward pressure on an industry’s profitability. Having more than one strong force means that an industry has multiple competitive challenges with which to cope.
© McGraw-Hill Education
3–21

Matching Company Strategy to
Competitive Conditions
Effectively matching a firm’s business strategy to prevailing competitive conditions has two aspects:
Pursuing avenues that shield the firm from as many competitive pressures as possible
Initiating actions calculated to shift competitive forces in the firm’s favor by altering underlying factors driving the five forces

Working through the five forces model step by step aids strategy-makers in assessing whether the intensity of competition allows good profitability and promotes sound strategic thinking about how to better match company strategy to the specific competitive character of the marketplace.
A company’s strategy is strengthened when it provides some insulation from competitive pressures, shifts the competitive battle in the company’s favor, and positions firms to take advantage of attractive growth opportunities.
© McGraw-Hill Education
3–22

Complementors and the Value Net
How the value net differs from the five forces
Focuses on the interactions of industry participants with a particular (focal) company
Defines the category of competitors to include the focal firm’s direct competitors, industry rivals, the sellers of substitute products, and potential entrants
Introduces a new category of industry participant—complementors—producers of products that enhance the value of the focal firm’s products when they are used together

Not all interactions among industry participants are necessarily competitive in nature. Some have the potential to be cooperative, as the value net framework demonstrates. Like the five forces framework, the value net includes an analysis of buyers, suppliers, and substitutors. But it differs from the five forces framework in several important ways.
© McGraw-Hill Education
3–23

FIGURE 3.9 The Value Net
Copyright ©McGraw-Hill Education. Permission required for reproduction or display.

Figure 3.9 depicts the value net used in an analysis of buyers, suppliers, and substitutors.
Complementors are the producers of complementary products, which are products that enhance the value of the focal firm’s products when they are used together.
© McGraw-Hill Education
3–24

Industry Dynamics and the Forces Driving Change
Driving forces analysis has three steps.
Identifying what the driving forces are
Assessing whether the drivers of change are
acting to make the industry more or less attractive
Determining what strategy changes are needed to prepare for the impact of the driving forces

Driving forces are the major underlying causes of change in industry and competitive conditions. Driving forces analysis has three steps: (1) identifying what the driving forces are; (2) assessing whether the drivers of change are acting to make the industry more or less attractive; and (3) determining what strategy changes are needed to prepare for the impact of the driving forces.
© McGraw-Hill Education
3–25

Identifying the Forces Driving Industry Change
Changes in the long-term industry growth rate
Increasing globalization
Emerging new Internet capabilities and applications
Shifts in buyer demographics
Technological change and manufacturing process innovation
Product and marketing innovation
Entry or exit of major firms
Diffusion of technical know-how across firms and countries
Changes in cost and efficiency
Reductions in uncertainty and business risk
Regulatory influences and government policy changes
Changing societal concerns, attitudes, and lifestyles

The most important part of driving forces analysis is to determine whether the collective impact of the driving forces will increase or decrease market demand, make competition more or less intense, and lead to higher or lower industry profitability.
The real payoff of driving-forces analysis is to help managers understand what strategy changes are needed to prepare for the impacts of the driving forces
© McGraw-Hill Education
3–26

Assessing the Impact of the Factors Driving Industry Change
Are the driving forces, on balance, acting to cause demand for the industry’s product to increase or decrease?
Is the collective impact of the driving forces making competition more or less intense?
Will the combined impacts of the driving forces lead to higher or lower industry profitability?

The second step in driving forces analysis is to determine whether the prevailing change drivers are acting to make the industry environment more or less attractive. Three questions need to be answered:
Are the driving forces, on balance, acting to cause demand for the industry’s product to increase or decrease?
Is the collective impact of the driving forces making competition more or less intense?
Will the combined impacts of the driving forces lead to higher or lower industry profitability?
Getting a handle on the collective impact of the driving forces requires looking at the likely effects of each factor separately, since the driving forces may not all be pushing change in the same direction.
© McGraw-Hill Education
3–27

Adjusting Strategy to Prepare for the Impacts of Driving Forces
What strategy adjustments will be needed
to deal with the impacts of the driving forces?
What adjustments must be made immediately?
What actions currently being taken should be halted or abandoned?
What can we do now to prepare for adjustments we anticipate making in the future?

The third step in the strategic analysis of industry dynamics—where the real payoff for strategy making comes—is for managers to draw some conclusions about what strategy adjustments will be needed to deal with the impacts of the driving forces. But taking the “right” kinds of actions to prepare for the industry and competitive changes being wrought by the driving forces first requires accurate diagnosis of the forces driving industry change and the impacts these forces will have on both the industry environment and the company’s business.
© McGraw-Hill Education
3–28

Strategic Group Analysis
Strategic group
Consists of those industry members with similar competitive approaches and positions in the market
Having comparable product-line breadth
Emphasizing the same distribution channels
Depending on identical technological approaches
Offering the same product attributes to buyers
Offering similar services and technical assistance

Within an industry, companies commonly sell in different price/quality ranges, appeal to different types of buyers, have different geographic coverage, and so on. Some are more attractively positioned than others. Understanding which companies are strongly positioned and which are weakly positioned is an integral part of analyzing an industry’s competitive structure. The best technique for revealing the market positions of industry competitors is strategic group mapping.
© McGraw-Hill Education
3–29

Using Strategic Group Maps to Assess the Market Positions of Key Competitors
Constructing a strategic group map
Identify the competitive characteristics that delineate strategic approaches used in the industry.
Plot the firms on a two-variable map using pairs of competitive characteristics.
Assign firms occupying about the same map location to the same strategic group.
Draw circles around each strategic group, making the circles proportional to the size of the group’s share of total industry sales revenues.

A strategic group is a cluster of industry rivals that have similar competitive approaches and market positions.
Strategic group mapping is a technique for displaying the different market or competitive positions that rival firms occupy in the industry.
Evaluating strategy options entails examining what strategic groups exist, identifying the companies within each group, and determining if a competitive “white space” exists where industry competitors can create and capture new demand.
© McGraw-Hill Education
3–30

Typical Variables Used in
Creating Group Maps
Price and quality range (high, medium, low)
Geographic coverage (local, regional, national, global)
Product-line breadth (wide, narrow)
Degree of service offered (no frills, limited, full)
Distribution channels (retail, wholesale, Internet, multiple)
Degree of vertical integration (none, partial, full)
Degree of diversification into other industries (none, some, considerable)

Guidelines for Creating Group Maps
Variables selected as map axes should not be highly correlated.
Variables should reflect important (sizable) differences among rival approaches.
Variables may be quantitative, continuous, discrete, or defined in terms of distinct classes and combinations.
Drawing group circles proportional to the combined sales of firms in each group will reflect the relative sizes of each strategic group.
Drawing maps using different pairs of variables will show the different competitive positioning relationships present in the industry’s structure.

Two variables selected as axes for the map should not be highly correlated; if they are, the circles on the map will fall along a diagonal and reveal nothing more about the relative positions of competitors than would be revealed by comparing the rivals on just one of the variables.
Strategic group maps reveal which firms are close competitors and which are distant competitors.
© McGraw-Hill Education
3–32

Illustration Capsule 3.1 Comparative Market Positions of Selected Companies in the Casual Dining Industry: A Strategic Group Map Example
Footnote: Circles are drawn roughly proportional to the sizes of the chains, based on revenues.
Access the text alternative for these images.
Copyright ©McGraw-Hill Education. Permission required for reproduction or display.

Illustration Capsule 3.1 shows a two-dimensional group mapping diagram for the U.S. casual dining industry.
© McGraw-Hill Education
3–33

Examining the Comparative Market Positions of Strategic Groups in the Casual Dining Industry
Which strategic group is located in the least favorable market position? Which group is in the most favorable position?
Which strategic group is likely to experience increased intragroup competition?
Which groups are most threatened by the likely strategic moves of members of nearby strategic groups?

Strategic group maps using different pairs of variable can be drawn to give different exposures to the competitive positioning relationships present in the industry’s structure—there is not necessarily one best map for portraying how competing firms are positioned.
© McGraw-Hill Education
3–34

The Value of Strategic Group Maps
Maps are useful in identifying which industry members are close rivals and which are distant rivals.
Not all map positions are equally attractive
Prevailing competitive pressures from the industry’s five forces may cause the profit potential of different strategic groups to vary.
Industry driving forces may favor some strategic groups and hurt others.

Some strategic groups are more favorably positioned than others because they confront weaker competitive forces or because they are more favorably impacted by industry driving forces.
Part of strategic group map analysis always entails drawing conclusions about where on the map is the “best” place to be and why. Which firms/strategic groups are destined to prosper because of their positions? Which firms/strategic groups seem destined to struggle? What accounts for why some parts of the map are better than others?
© McGraw-Hill Education
3–35

Competitor Analysis
Competitive intelligence
Information about rivals that is useful in anticipating their next strategic moves
Signals of the likelihood of strategic moves
Rivals under pressure to improve financial performance
Rivals seeking to increase market standing
Public statements of rivals’ intentions
Profiles developed by competitive intelligence units

Studying competitors’ past behavior and preferences provides a valuable assist in anticipating what moves rivals are likely to make next and in outmaneuvering them in the marketplace.
The question is where to look for such information since rivals rarely reveal their strategic intentions openly. If information is not directly available, what are the best indicators?
© McGraw-Hill Education
3–36

FIGURE 3.10 The SOAR Framework for Competitor Analysis

Access the text alternative for these images.
Copyright ©McGraw-Hill Education. Permission required for reproduction or display.

Michael Porter’s SOAR Framework for Competitor Analysis points to four indicators of a rival’s likely strategic moves and countermoves. These include a rival’s current strategy, objectives, resources and capabilities, and assumptions about itself and the industry, as shown in Figure 3.10. A strategic profile of a rival that provides good clues to its behavioral proclivities can be constructed by characterizing the rival along these four dimensions.
© McGraw-Hill Education
3–37

SOAR Framework for Competitor Analysis
Indicators of a rival firm’s likely strategic moves and countermoves
The rival firm’s current strategy
The rival firm’s objectives
The rival firm’s assumptions about itself and its industry
The rival firm’s resources and capabilities

Current Strategy: To succeed in predicting a competitor’s next moves, company strategists need to understand each rival’s current strategy.
Objectives: An appraisal of a rival’s objectives should include not only its financial performance objectives but strategic ones as well (such as those concerning market share).
Assumptions: How a rival’s top managers think about their strategic situation can have a big impact on how the rival behaves.
Resources and Capabilities: A rival’s strategic moves and countermoves are both enabled and constrained by the set of resources and capabilities the rival has at hand.
© McGraw-Hill Education
3–38

Key Success Factors
Key success factors (KSFs):
Are the strategy elements, product and service attributes, operational approaches, resources, and competitive capabilities that are necessary for competitive success by any and all firms in an industry.
These vary from industry to industry, and over time within the same industry, and in importance as drivers of change and competitive conditions change.

An industry’s key success factors (KSFs) are those competitive factors that most affect industry members’ ability to survive and prosper in the marketplace: the particular strategy elements, product attributes, operational approaches, resources, and competitive capabilities that spell the difference between being a strong competitor and a weak competitor—and between profit and loss. KSFs are so important to competitive success that all firms in the industry must pay close attention to them or risk becoming an industry laggard or failure.
© McGraw-Hill Education
3–39

Identification of Key Success Factors
What crucial product attributes and service characteristics do buyers of the industry’s product consider when choosing among competing brands of sellers?
Given the nature of competitive rivalry prevailing in the marketplace, what resources and competitive capabilities must a firm have to be competitively successful?
What shortcomings are almost certain to put a firm at a significant competitive disadvantage?

Key success factors vary from industry to industry, and even occasionally within the same industry, as change drivers and competitive conditions change. But regardless of the circumstances, an industry’s key success factors can always be deduced by asking the same three questions shown on this slide.
© McGraw-Hill Education
3–40

The Industry Outlook for Profitability
An industry environment is fundamentally attractive if it presents a company with good opportunity for above-average profitability.
An industry environment is fundamentally unattractive if a firm’s profit prospects in the industry are unappealingly low.

Each of the frameworks presented in this chapter—PESTEL, five forces analysis, driving forces, strategy groups, competitor analysis, and key success factors—provides a useful perspective on an industry’s outlook for future profitability. Putting them all together provides an even richer and more nuanced picture. Thus, the final step in evaluating the industry and competitive environment is to use the results of each of the analyses performed to determine whether the industry presents the company with profit opportunities.
© McGraw-Hill Education
3–41

Factors to Consider in Assessing Industry Attractiveness
How the firm is impacted by the state of the macro-environment
Whether strong competitive forces are squeezing industry profitability to subpar levels
Whether the presence of complementors and the possibility of cooperative actions improve the company’s prospects
Whether industry profitability will be favorably or unfavorably affected by the prevailing driving forces
Whether the firm occupies a stronger market position than rivals
Whether this is likely to change in the course of competitive interactions
How well the firm’s strategy delivers on industry key success factors

This slide lists the important factors on which to base a conclusion about a firm’s prospects for competitive success and attractive profits in a particular industry.
© McGraw-Hill Education
3–42

Industry Attractiveness Is Not the Same for All Participants
Industry outsiders may conclude that they have the resources to easily hurdle the barriers to entering an attractive industry while other outsiders may find the same industry unattractive because they do not want to challenge market leaders and have better opportunities elsewhere.
A particular industry’s attractiveness depends in large part on whether a company has the resources and capabilities to be competitively successful and profitable in that environment.

The degree to which an industry is attractive or unattractive is not the same for all industry participants and all potential entrants.
© McGraw-Hill Education
3–43

What Should a Current Competitor Decide About Its Industry?
When a competitor decides an industry is attractive, it should invest aggressively to capture the opportunities it sees and to improve its long-term competitive position in the business.
When a strong competitor concludes its industry is relatively unattractive and lacking in opportunity, it may elect to protect its present position, investing cautiously, if at all, and looking for opportunities in other industries.
A competitively weak company in an unattractive industry may see its best option as finding a buyer, perhaps a rival, to acquire its business.

When a company decides an industry is fundamentally attractive and presents good opportunities, a strong case can be made that it should invest aggressively to capture the opportunities it sees and to improve its long-term competitive position in the business. When a strong competitor concludes an industry is becoming less attractive, it may elect to simply protect its present position, investing cautiously, if at all, and looking for opportunities in other industries. A competitively weak company in an unattractive industry may see its best option as finding a buyer, perhaps a rival, to acquire its business.
© McGraw-Hill Education
3–44

APPENDIX: IMAGE DESCRIPTIONS FOR UNSIGHTED STUDENTS

Appendix 1: From Analyzing Company’s Situation to Choosing a Strategy, Text Alternative
Thinking strategically about a company’s external (Chapter 3) and internal (Chapter 4) environments helps to:
Form a strategic vision of where the company needs to head.
Identify promising strategic options for the company.
Select the best strategy and business model for the company.
Return to slide

Appendix 2: The Components of a Company’s Macro-Environment, Text Alternative
A company’s macroenvironment includes the economic conditions, sociocultural forces, environmental forces, legal and regulatory forces, and political forces.
The immediate industry and competitive environment includes the company, suppliers, substitute products, buyers, new entrants, and rival firms.
Return to slide

Appendix 3: Figure 3.4 Factors Affecting the Strength of Rivalry, Text Alternative
Rivalry increases and becomes a stronger force when:
Buyer demand is growing slowly.
Buyer costs to switch brands are low.
The products of industry members are commodities or else weakly differentiated.
The firms in the industry have excess production capacity or inventory.
The firms in the industry have high fixed costs or high storage costs.
Competitors are numerous or are of roughly equal size and competitive strength.
Rivals have diverse objectives, strategies, or countries of origin.
Rivals have emotional stakes in the business or face high exit barriers.
Rivalry decreases and becomes a weaker force under the opposite conditions.
Return to slide containing the original image.

Appendix 4: The Five-Forces Model of Competition: A Key Analytical Tool, Text Alternative
Rivalry among competing sellers is at the center of the graphic. The text reads, “Competitive pressures come from other firms in the industry.” Surrounding this are four other types of forces and their competitive pressures.
Firms in other industries offering substitute products and competitive pressures coming from the producers of substitute products
Buyers: competitive pressures stemming from buyer bargaining power
Potential new entrants: competitive pressures coming from the threat of entry of new rivals
Suppliers: competitive pressures stemming from supplier bargaining power
All four forces have arrows pointing toward the center’s rivalry among competing sellers. In turn, rivalry among competing sellers has two arrows pointing outward, one toward buyers, and one toward suppliers.
Return to slide

Appendix 5: Figure 3.5 Factors Affecting the Threat of Entry, Text Alternative
The five-forces model of competition is displayed. Within the box, Competitive Pressures from Potential Entrants, is text which reads: “threat of entry is a stronger force when incumbents are unlikely to make retaliatory moves against new entrants and entry barriers are low.” Entry barriers are high (and threat of entry is low) when:
Incumbents have large cost advantages over potential entrants due to high economies of scale; significant experience-based cost advantages or learning curve effects; and other cost advantages (e.g., favorable access to inputs, technology, location, or low fixed costs).
Customers have strong brand preferences and/or loyalty to incumbent sellers.
Patents and other forms of intellectual property protection are in place.
There are strong network effects.
Capital requirements are high.
There is limited new access to distribution channels and shelf space.
Government policies are restrictive.
There are restrictive trade policies.
Return to the slide containing the original image.

Appendix 6: Figure 3. 6 Factors Affecting Competition from Substitute Products, Text Alternative
Competitive pressures from substitutes are stronger when:
Good substitutes are readily available and attractively priced.
Substitutes have comparable or better performance features.
Buyers have low costs in switching to substitutes.
Competitive pressures from substitutes are weaker under the opposite conditions.
Signs that competition from substitutes is strong:
Sales of substitutes are growing faster than sales of the industry being analyzed.
Producers of substitutes are moving to add new capacity.
Profits of the producers of substitutes are on the rise.
Return to slide containing original images.

Appendix 7: Figure 3.7 Factors Affecting the Bargaining Power of Suppliers, Text Alternative
Supplier bargaining power is stronger when:
Suppliers’ products and or services are in short supply.
Suppliers’ products and or services are differentiated.
Industry members incur high costs in switching their purchases to alternative suppliers.
The supplier industry is more concentrated than the industry it sells to and is dominated by a few large companies.
Industry members do not have the potential to integrate backward in order to self-manufacture their own inputs.
Suppliers’ products do not account for more than a small fraction of the total costs of the industry’s products.
There are no good substitutes for what the suppliers provide.
Industry members do not account for a big fraction of suppliers’ sales.
Supplier bargaining power is weaker under the opposite conditions.
Return to slide containing original images.

Appendix 8: Figure 3.8 Factors Affecting the Bargaining Power of Buyers, Text Alternative
Competitive pressures from buyers increase when they have strong bargaining power and are price-sensitive. Buyer bargaining power is stronger when:
Buyer demand is weak in relation to industry supply.
The industry’s products are standardized or undifferentiated.
Buyer costs of switching to competing products are low.
Buyers are large and few in number relative to the number of industry sellers.
Buyers pose a credible threat of integrating backward into the business of sellers.
Buyers are well informed about the quality, prices, and costs of sellers.
Buyers have the ability to postpone purchases.
Buyers are price-sensitive and increase competitive pressures when:
Buyers earn low profits or low income.
The product represents a significant fraction of their purchases.
Competitive pressures from buyers decrease and become a weaker force under the opposite conditions.
Return to slide containing the original image.

Appendix 9: Illustration Capsule 3.1 Comparative Market Positions of Selected Firms in the Casual Dining Industry: A Strategic Group Map Example, Text Alternative
A four-by-four grid is displayed. The vertical axis, labeled “Price/Service/ Restaurant ambiance,” is labeled “Low” at its base and “High” at its top. The horizontal axis, “Geographic Coverage,” is labeled “Few U.S. Locations” at left, “Many U.S. Locations” at the axis midpoint, and “International” at right.
Circles labeled with the names of casual dining firms are placed throughout the grid. One strategic group with members of varying levels of Price/Service/ Ambiance is clustered at the left of Geographic Coverage. A second strategic group is generally located at the midpoint of Geographic Coverage with no firm in the group reaching the upper area of the Price/Service/ambiance scale. A third group is distributed between the midpoint and upper end of the Geographic Coverage scale, with most of its members at and above the midpoint of the Price/Service/Ambiance scale.
The sizes of the labeled circles are roughly proportional to the sizes of the rival chains based on revenues. The proportional sizes of firms within all groups (based on revenues) varies from large to small.
Return to slide containing original image.

Appendix 10: Figure 3.10 The SOAR Framework for Competitor Analysis, Text Analysis
Five boxes are shown. Four boxes have arrows pointing to a central box. The central box is labeled “Strategic moves (actions and reactions) and outcomes.” The surrounding four boxes are labeled as follows:
Current strategy: How the company is competing currently.
Objectives: Strategic and performance objectives
Assumptions: Held about itself and the industry
Resources and capabilities: Key strengths and weaknesses

Return to the slide containing original image..

Concepts
and Cases

22e

Thompson

Peteraf

Gamble

Strickland

The Quest for Competit ive Advantage

STRATEGY
Crafting & Executing

Turn in your highest-quality paper
Get a qualified writer to help you with

“ Pestel Analysis ”

Get high-quality paper

NEW! AI matching with writer

Hire a Writer

Client Reviews

4.9

Sitejabber

4.6

Trustpilot

4.8

Our Guarantees

100% Confidentiality

Information about customers is confidential and never disclosed to third parties.

Original Writing

We complete all papers from scratch. You can get a plagiarism report.

Timely Delivery

No missed deadlines – 97% of assignments are completed in time.

Money Back

If you're confident that a writer didn't follow your order details, ask for a refund.

New to Your Trusted Assignment Help Service? Sign up & Save

Calculate the price of your order

Type of paper needed:

Pages:

You will get a personal manager and a discount.

Academic level:

We'll send you the first draft for approval by at

Total price:

$0.00

Power up Your Academic Success with the
Team of Professionals. We’ve Got Your Back.

Power up Your Study Success with Experts We’ve Got Your Back.

Order Now Order Now